Lecture 3 Measurement Model of Productivity 27 Feb
-
Upload
babanianjali -
Category
Documents
-
view
473 -
download
0
Transcript of Lecture 3 Measurement Model of Productivity 27 Feb
LECTURE 3 :
MEASUREMENT MODEL OF PRODUCTIVITY27 FEBRUARY 2009
Methods and Work Measurement
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII @ 2009
Why do We Care About Productivity?
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
Productivity is affected by efficiency, effectiveness, and quality.
Productivity, together with innovation and quality of working life, determine the total organizational performance – profitability
Without productivity improvement, businesses do not survive in a global economy.
Higher productivity means higher standard of living
Total Organizational Performance
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
Efficiency
Effectiveness
Quality
Productivity
Innovation
Quality of working life
Profitability(organizational Performance)
Productivity Measurement Techniques
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
Multi-factors productivity: Output/multiple inputs
Total Productivity: Output/total inputs
Partial Productivity
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
•= Output/LabourLabour Productivity
•= Output/MaterialMaterial Productivity
•=Output/MachineMachine Productivity
Partial Productivity
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
•=Output/EnergyEnergy
ProductivityEtc…
Contoh Soal:
Dalam sebulan PT. Noodle mampu memproduksi 10.000 units produk dengan 500 jam kerja, berapa produktivitas tenaga kerja perusahaan tsb?
Jawab:
10,000 units/500hrs = 20 units/hour
Multi-factors Productivity
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
•Output/(Labor + machine)
Multi-factors productivity
•Output/(Labor + machine+ material)
Multi-factors productivity
•Output/(Labor + energy+ material)
Multi-factors productivity
Etc…
Case Study
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
Berikut ini adalah data output hasil produksi dan input yang digunakan oleh PT. Noodle dalam satu periode waktu:- Output : $ 5000
- Labor : $ 600 - Material: $ 800 - Energy : $ 500 - Capital : $ 400 - Other expense input : $ 500
berdasarkan data-data tersebut diatas maka rasio produktivitas parsial dan total perusahaan tsb pada periode dasar adalah:
Answer : Partial Productivity
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
•= 5000/600= 8.33•= 5000/800= 6.25
Labor ProductivityMaterial
Productivity
•= 5000/500= 10•= 5000/400= 12.5
Energy ProductivityCapital Productivity
•= 5000/500= 10Other expense productivity
Answer: Total Productivity
Total Productivity :
= Total Output/ (labor + material + capital + energy + other expense input)= 5000 / (600+800+400+500+500)= 5000/2800= 1.785
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
Measurement Model of Productivity
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
Objective Matrix (OMAX)
Model Craig HarisMarvin E Mundel (1976)
American Productivity Center (APC)
Objective Matrix (OMAX)
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
OMAX is a partial productivity measurement developed for controlling productivity in the each part of firm system based on criteria of productivity.
Developed by James L. Riggs (Dept. of Industrial Engineering at Oregon State University) in 1980.
Objective Matrix (OMAX) Model
DEFINITION BLOCK
QUANTIFICATION BLOCK
WEIGHT AND VALUE BLOCK
Objective Matrix (OMAX) Model
criteriaoductivityPr
ePerformancMeasured
eperformancExpected
eperformancBased
eperformancWorstScoresWeight
indicatoroductivityValue Pr
Scores
Objective Matrix (OMAX) Model: Example
No. Productivity criteria
units 1 January 2003 Measured performance on 30 dec.2003The worst
performanceExpected
performanceBased
performance
1.
2.
3. 4.
5.
6.
Speed of service
Lateness
Queuing
Idle time
Absent
Complain
min./man
min./day
man
minute
man/day
man/wk
10
60
8
60
10
7
2
10
2
15
2
0
4
45
5
30
4
5
3
30
5
40
5
2
Objective Matrix (OMAX) Model : Example
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
Index of Performance = (Productivity Indicator – Based Performance)/Based Performance)
x 1 00%
Based Performance = 300Productivity Indicator = a sum of all values
= 120+180+30+30+30+70
= 460Value = Score x WeightIndex of Performance = ((460 – 300)/300) x
100% = 53.33%
Model of Marvin E. Mundel
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
This model measures total productivity by comparing between productivity in Measured Period and Base Period
Index of Productivity in base period is 100 so that there are three states of index of productivity in measured period: IP < 100. It means that the productivity in
measured period less than base period IP = 100. It means that the productivity in
measured period equals base period IP > 100. It means that the productivity in
measured period more than base periodThe better the productivity, the higher the IP. The
IP is always more than 100
Model of Marvin E. Mundel
100100 indexeperformancbase
indexeperformanccurrent
AIBP
AOBPAIMP
AOMP
PI
100100 indexinputs
indexoutputs
AIBP
AIMPAOBP
AOMP
PI
PeriodMeasuredOutputAgregatedAOMP ,
PeriodBaseOutputAgregatedAOBP ,
PeriodMeasuredInputsAgregatedAIMP ,
PeriodBaseInputsAgregatedAIBP ,
Model of Marvin E. Mundel
Case Study : Garuda Indonesia has data as follow:
Determine: AOMP,AOBP,AIMP,AIBP,CPI,BPI,OI,II and IP
No Statement 2007 2008
1. 2. 3.4. 5.6.7. 8.9.
TicketingDirect labor costIndirect labor cost Cargo serviceOverhead costVIP flight serviceBuilding cost for rentMaintenance cost Administration cost
10 billion4 billion2 billion2 billion1 billion500 million1.5 billion800 million200 million
15 billion5 billion3 billion1.4 billion700 million600 million2 billion500 million300 million
Model of Marvin E. Mundel
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
Solution:1. Statements of output: Ticketing Cargo service VIP flight service2. Statements of input: Direct labor cost Indirect labor cost Overhead cost Building cost for rent Maintenance cost Administration cos
AOMP = 15 + 1.4 +0.600 (billion) = 17 billionAOBP = 10 + 2 + 0.500 (billion) = 12.5 billionAIMP = 5 + 3 + 0.700 + 2 + 0.500 + 0.300 =
11.5 billionAIBP = 4 + 2 + 1 + 1.5 + 0.800 + 0.200 = 9.5
billion
Model of Marvin E. Mundel
32.15.9
5.12
AIBP
AOBPBPI 48.1
5.11
17
AIMP
AOMPCPI
38.15.12
17
AOBP
AOMPOI 2.1
5.9
5.11
AIBP
AIMPII
%35.112100
5.9
5.125.11
17
1002004
AIBP
AOBPAIMP
AOMP
IP
APC Model
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
The American Productivity Center (APC) has been advocating a productivity measure that relates profitability with productivity and price recovery factor. The way this measure is derived is:
tunitquantitiesinput
pricesquantitiesoutput
Cost
Salesityprofitabil
cos
tunit
prices
quantitiesinput
quantitiesoutput
cos
eryfactorrepricetyproductiviityprofitabil cov
The “productivity” ratio gives an indication of the amount of resources consumed to produce the firm’s output
The changes in “price recovery factor” over time indicate whether changes in input cost are absorbed, passed on, or overcompensated for in the prices of the firm’s output
In this model, the capital input is given by total depreciation plus profit relative to the total assets (i.e. fixed assets + working capital) employed
Thus, the capital input for any particular period = depreciation for that period + (return on assets in base period) x (current assets employed)
APC Model
APC Model Example:
APC Model
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
In period 1, the firm had capital assets $ 100,000, yielding $10,000 depreciation at the average rate of 10%.
The profit earned in period 1 was the difference between the revenue and total input cost, that is, $49,000 output minus $38,100 resulting in $10,900.
The base period (period 1) return on total capital is calculated as follows:
periodbaseincapitalworkingassetsfixed
periodbaseinprofitreturncapitaltotal
APC Model
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
Assuming that the working capital in period 1 was $50,000;
073.0000,50$000,100$
900,10$
capitaltotalonreturnperiodbase
In period 2, we have assumed that the fixed assets remained at $100,000, but the working capital increased to $80,000.
Thus return (profit) of the firm is $13,140, which is the profit should have made if it had maintained its profitability relative to its total assets
However, the actual profit in period 2 is given as $54,500 minus $44,500 resulting in $10,000
This means that the firm’s profit fell short by ($13,140 - $10,000) = $3,140.
APC Model
AP
C M
od
el
APC Model
Table 7.3 shows that labor productivity improved by 11.81 % in period 2, and that the wage rates increased considerably, as indicated by a price recovery index of 0.814
This means that the productivity increase was overshadowed, with the net effect of a drop in profitability by 1.000 – 0.962 = 0.038 or 3.8%
APC Model :
Model Craig Haris
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII
OtPt
L C R O
Pt = produktivitas totalC = Faktor masukan totalL = Faktor masukan tenaga kerjaR = Raw material and purchased parts inputO = Faktor masukan barang dan jasa lain Ot = total ouput
Hanna Lestari, ST, M.Eng-FTI-UII