LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives:...

22
LECTURE 25 LECTURE 25 UNIONS & UNIONS & DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010 December 7, 2010

Transcript of LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives:...

Page 1: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

LECTURE 25LECTURE 25

UNIONS & UNIONS & DEMOCRACYDEMOCRACY

December 7, 2010December 7, 2010

Page 2: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

Democracy & the media Democracy & the media (continued)(continued)

III. Alternatives: III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free pressrevitalizing a democratic free press

Page 3: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

III. ALTERNATIVES III. ALTERNATIVES

1.1. A Fundamental IdeaA Fundamental Idea

A vibrant, high quality free press in the public A vibrant, high quality free press in the public interest is a interest is a public goodpublic good. Capitalist markets . Capitalist markets generally do a poor job in providing public generally do a poor job in providing public goods; public goods need some kind of goods; public goods need some kind of systematic public support.systematic public support.

Page 4: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

III. ALTERNATIVES III. ALTERNATIVES

2. Three kinds of broadcast media: commercial, 2. Three kinds of broadcast media: commercial, state, and nonprofit/community mediastate, and nonprofit/community media

• The media system in the US is dominated by private commercial The media system in the US is dominated by private commercial firmsfirms

• Other places in the world have a much stronger public, Other places in the world have a much stronger public, noncommercial sector paid to a significant extent by taxes. In the noncommercial sector paid to a significant extent by taxes. In the U.K. you pay a license fee to have a TV which pays for the BBC.U.K. you pay a license fee to have a TV which pays for the BBC.

• Public broadcasting the US is heavily dependent on donations. Public broadcasting the US is heavily dependent on donations. Less that 15% from taxes.Less that 15% from taxes.

• Problem for nonprofit, noncommercial community broadcasting is Problem for nonprofit, noncommercial community broadcasting is the free-rider problem: you can listen to public radio even if you the free-rider problem: you can listen to public radio even if you don’t pay for it. Only 10% of listeners contribute.don’t pay for it. Only 10% of listeners contribute.

Page 5: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

III. ALTERNATIVES III. ALTERNATIVES

3. Toward a Democratic Media System3. Toward a Democratic Media System

What would it take to create a vibrant, democracy-enhancing What would it take to create a vibrant, democracy-enhancing media system in the United States? media system in the United States?

Some key elements would include:Some key elements would include:

1.1. Media empires and conglomerates should be prohibited in the Media empires and conglomerates should be prohibited in the public interest: break up the chains.public interest: break up the chains.

2.2. The public, noncommercial, nonprofit media sector should be the The public, noncommercial, nonprofit media sector should be the dominant sector in broadcasting, with the commercial sector dominant sector in broadcasting, with the commercial sector adapting to this.adapting to this.

3.3. Encourage diverse forms of ownership: employee cooperatives, Encourage diverse forms of ownership: employee cooperatives, community stations, university, non-profit corporations. All of these community stations, university, non-profit corporations. All of these need subsidies.need subsidies.

4.4. Provide public subsidies but without state control.Provide public subsidies but without state control.

Page 6: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

4. Two ways of providing public subsidies of 4. Two ways of providing public subsidies of information media as a public goodinformation media as a public good

•Return airwaves to public control and treat as a public Return airwaves to public control and treat as a public resource. It should be leased, and the rents from the leases resource. It should be leased, and the rents from the leases should be used to support public sector broadcasting, should be used to support public sector broadcasting, including community and nonprofit radio, television and including community and nonprofit radio, television and newspapers. Rents could supply up to $2-4 billion/year newspapers. Rents could supply up to $2-4 billion/year subsidy.subsidy.

•Targeted Tax Credit (not tax deduction) for nonprofit media Targeted Tax Credit (not tax deduction) for nonprofit media support – the Nichols/McChesney proposal for a $200 tax support – the Nichols/McChesney proposal for a $200 tax credit for newspaper subscriptions.credit for newspaper subscriptions.

III. ALTERNATIVES III. ALTERNATIVES

Page 7: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

UNIONS & UNIONS & DEMOCRACYDEMOCRACY

Page 8: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

I. The Problem

Democracy: Rule by the people = the “will of the people” translated into the public purposes of the state.

The problem: How to form a genuine “will of the people” and how to translate it into public policy?

The obstacle: We live in a highly atomized society of separate, competing individuals pursuing their individual interests, facing numerous “free rider problems.”

The solution: The formation of various kinds of grass roots organizations that are directly integrated into people’s ordinary lives and concerns and which help build solidarities and collective capacity.

Examples: Unions; Community-based civic associations

Page 9: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

THREE SPHERES OF SOCIAL LIFE

The economy: the sphere in which we produce and buy things

The State: the sphere in which we govern our collective affairs

Civil Society: the sphere in which we get together voluntarily in organizations to pursue common purposes

Page 10: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

II. What Are Labor Unions?

1. Conventional view:

• Labor unions are a special interest organization that looks out for the narrow economic interests of their members at the expense of everyone else.

• Some people think that unions mainly benefit union leaders.

• The decline in unions is explained as reflecting the individualistic, competitive preferences of most Americans.

Page 11: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

II. What Are Labor Unions?

2. Alternative View: unions help create more equal power:

(1). Economic Power: Workers are individually much less powerful than employers: they need a job more than the employer needs them. Unions help equalize their relative power.

Empirical effect: unionized workers earn higher wages than non-unionized workers in the same occupations.

Page 12: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

Impact of Unions on low-wage workers (2000)

Low-wage occupation

Average wage

Union Nonunion

Yearly earnings

Union Nonunion

% difference

Income difference

Cashier $10.04 $7.35 $20,883 $15,288 37% $5,595

Janitors $12.12 $8.69 $25,210 $18,075 39% $7,134

Farm workers $10.51 $7.71 $21,861 $16,037 36% $5824

Poverty level for family of four (2000)

hourly earnings: $8.40 (assuming full time work)

annual income: $17,472

Page 13: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

II. What Are Labor Unions?

2. Alternative View: unions help create more equal power:

(2). Political Power: The labor movement is one of the important ways that individuals can be brought into politics through two processes:

Organic Solidarities: Unions help build solidarities among people in one important setting of their lives – workplaces – and get people involved in collective decisions.

Organizational capacity. Unions help build a bridge between individuals and electoral politics. They make it easier for people to work in campaigns and thus counteract the role of money in elections.

Page 14: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

1. Historic hostility to unions

Conflict of two values: (1) Freedom of association, and (2) Freedom of voluntary exchange in a market. Until well into the 20th century Unions were seen as coercive restrictions of voluntary contracts. Laws which restrict union activities are defended under the banner of the “right to work.”

III. Historical Development of Labor Movement

Page 15: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

2. The Problem: vulnerability of organizers & members

• For a union to be strong it needs a high proportion of workers in a firm to be members: there is strength in numbers.

• All unions begin as weak organizations.

• When a union is weak, individuals are extremely vulnerable to reprisal from employers from joining a union.

• This makes it very hard for a union to grow slowly and incrementally unless there are legal protections enforced by the state.

• A central problem in any labor movement is therefore creating a favorable legal framework for union organizing.

Page 16: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

3. Breakthrough: the New Deal Reforms, mid-late 1930s

The Wagner Act was the most important Labor law reform in the1930s. Key provisions:

• National Labor Relations Board established to oversee rules

• protections of workers against being fired for trying to form a union or joining a union

• protections against being fired for going on strike

• fair rules for union organizers to try to form a union and clear procedures for certifying a legitimate union

• requirement that employers bargain in “good faith” when there is a union

Page 17: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

UnionizationUnionization Rates 1930-1955

Page 18: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

4. Basic process by which a union gets formed

• Organizers try to get employees to sign cards saying that they want a union.

• When a majority of employees have signed these organizing cards, then a vote is taken to “certify” the union as a collective bargaining unit.

• After a union has been certified, employers have to meet with them and engage in what is called “good faith bargaining”

• This bargaining ideally culminates in a contract – an agreement between the union and the employers. The contract is then voted on by union members.

• If no contract is bargained, then the union can go on strike to put pressure on the employer.

• During the strike an employer can hire replacements – which unions called “scabs” to work instead of the striking workers.

• Employers are not allowed to fire workers while on strike, but they also are not prevented from replacing them with permanent replacements. One of the conditions of settlement of successful strikes is nearly always getting rid of the replacement workers.

Page 19: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

5. Erosion of rules after WWII•Taft-Hartley amendments to the Wagner Act significantly weaken union protections

•“Right to Work” laws in many states prevent automatic union membership for workers in unionized firms

•increasingly lax enforcement of labor laws

Page 20: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

6. Contemporary Strategies of Employers to undermine unions

•Mandatory captive audience meetings in which anti-union propaganda is presented

•Widespread hiring of professional anti-union consultants

•Threats: to move businesses, to call in INS against immigrant workers

•Illegal firing and discrimination against workers who sign union cards.

•Strategic use of the expense and time workers face of taking employers to court for illegal firing

•Reliance on lax enforcement of labor laws by government authorities

•Even after union victories, use of continual, aggressive anti-union activity to block contacts.

•Less than half of unions who win certification manage to negotiate a contract.

Page 21: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

7. The result: Decline of the Labor movement after mid-1950s

Page 22: LECTURE 25 UNIONS & DEMOCRACY December 7, 2010. Democracy & the media (continued) III. Alternatives: revitalizing a democratic free press.

8. Consequences for Democracy of decline of unions

• Absence of a coherent associational basis for a working class electorate

• Reduced pressures on the Democratic Party to focus on working class interests: the Democratic Party also becomes largely responsive to needs of big corporations

• Reduced counterweight to role of money in shaping political agendas: two sources of power in a democracy – willingness to pay and willingness to act. Unions used to be a central basis for the latter.