Lecture 1 & 2 Strategic Hrm 2006
-
Upload
arvind-prabhu-dewakar -
Category
Business
-
view
36.838 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Lecture 1 & 2 Strategic Hrm 2006
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Dr. Ernesto Dimaculangan, Ph.D.Singapore Institute of Commerce
Schedule October 10 9:30am – 5:30 pm
Lecture 1 & 2 – Introduction to HRM and Strategic HRM
Lecture 3 – Recruitment, Selection and Placement
Lecture 4 & 5 – Employee Learning, Training, Development and Career Management
Lecture 6 & 7 – Employee’s Compensation
Lecture 8 - Managing Diversity
Schedule
October 15 2:00 pm – 5:30 pm Lecture 8 - continuation Lecture 9 – Performance Management Lecture 10 – Managing a Global
Workforce
Lecture 1 & 2 Introduction to HRM and
Strategic Human Resource Management
Definitions
HRM: Refers to the policies, practices and
systems that influence employees’ behaviour, attitudes and performance.
(Di Cieri, 2003)
HRM includes anything and everything associated with the management of employment relations in the firm.
(Boxall, Purcell, 2003)
Attempt to Clarify the Approaches in Managing PeopleGuest 1987; Storey 1992
“soft” variants of HRM – used to describe approaches aimed at enhancing the commitment, quality and flexibility of employees
“hard” variants of HRM – describes the emphasis on strategy where human resources are deployed to achieve business goals in the same way as any other resource. Cost minimization as in low wages, minimal
training, close supervision Lean production (downsizing)
New Terms for HRM
High commitment management (HCM) instead of soft HRM
Strategic HRM instead of hard HRM
Two Models Influential in the Interpretation of HRM The Matching Model
Developed by Michigan Business School Introduced the concept of strategic
HRM A tight fit between HR and business
strategy Use of HR policies and practices
integrated with each other and with the goals of the organization
The map of HRM territory model Harvard Model
Assumptions of Matching Model Managing people will vary from
organizations to organizations and is dependent on organizational context
Unitarism – the assumption that conflict or differing views cannot exist in the workplace because everyone (managers and employees) are working to achieve the same goal.
The model formed the basis of ‘Best Fit” school of HRM
Matching Model Key areas for the development of
appropriate HR policies and systems; Selection of the most suitable people to meet
business objectives Performance in the pursuit of business
objectives Appraisal, monitoring performance and
providing feedback to the organization and its employees
Rewards for appropriate performance Development of skills and knowledge
required to meet business objectives
The Matching Model of HRM
FIRM
OrganizationStructure
HRM
Mission andStrategy
Economic Forces
Political Forces
Cultural Forces
Map of HRM Territory Model
“the map of HRM territory” model or Harvard Model (Beer et al.at Harvard Univ.) Recognizes the legitimate interest of
various groups of stakeholders assumes the creation of HRM
strategies reflect the stakeholder interests fuse them into the HR and business
strategies.
The Map of HRM Territory
Stakeholders Interest
ShareholdersManagementEmployees
Govt, CommunityUnions
Situational FactorsWorkforce
Characteristics,Business strategy
And conditionsManagement
PhilosophyLabor market
Unions, tasks techLaws and societal values
Long Term Consequences
Individual Well being
OrganizationalEffectiveness
Societal Well being
HR outcomesCommitmentCompetenceCongruence
Cost-effectiveness
HRM PolicyChoices
Employees InfluenceHR flow
Reward systemWork system
HR hr
Map of HRM Territory Model
Balance the integration of hard and soft HRM which led to “best practice” school of HRM
“Best practice” is based on universalism A set of practices aimed at high
commitment or high performance will benefit all organizations regardless of context.
Elements of best practices (Pfeffer) are universally acceptable
Elements of Best Practice Model (Pferrer 1998)
Employment security Sophisticated selection Team working and decentralization High wages linked to
organizational performance Extensive training Communications and involvement
Strategic HRM
Strategy defined (Chandler)
The determination of the basic long-term goals and objectives of an enterprise, and the adoption of courses of action and the allocation of resources necessary for the goals.
Strategic HRM
Strategic HRM is concerned with the strategic choices associated with the use of labor in firms and with explaining why some firms manage them more effectively than others. (Boxall and Purcell 2000, p185)
Common Elements in Successful Strategies (Grant 2002)
Successful Strategy
Effective Implementation
Profound Understanding of The competitiveenvironment
Objective Appraisal of Resources
Long-term, simple.And agreedObjectives
Strategic HRM Models
Models that attempted to explore the link between business strategy and HR policies and practices 1. Lifecycle model (Kochan &
Barocci, 1985) 2. Competitive advantage model
(Miles and Snow 1978)
Lifecycle Model (Kochan & Barocci Model, 1985)
Policies and practices of the organization to fit the relevant stage of an organization’s development or lifecycle.
Lifecycle Model (Kochan & Barocci Model, 1985)
Introductory stage Start up phase of the business –
emphasis on “flexibility” in HR to enable the business to grow and foster entrepreneurialism
Growth stage Business grows beyond a certain size –
emphasis would move to the development of formal HR policies and procedures.
Lifecycle Model (Kochan & Barocci Model, 1985)
Maturity stage Markets mature and margins decrease,
the performance of certain products or the organization plateaus, the focus of the HR strategy is cost control.
Decline stage Emphasis shifts to rationalization,
downsizing and redundancy implications for the HR functions.
Lifecycle Model (Kochan & Barocci Model, 1985)
Issues regarding the Lifecycle Model How can HR strategy secure and retain the
type of human resources that are necessary for the organization’s continued viability, as industries and sectors developed?
Which HR policies and practices are more likely to contribute to sustainable competitive advantage as organizations go through their lifecycle?
Lifecycle Model (Kochan & Barocci Model, 1985)
Two kinds of mature organizations that manage to survive industry development (Baden-Fuller 1995) 1. the firm that succeeds in dominating the
direction of industry change 2. the firm that manages to adapt to the
direction of change. The route to HR advantage lies in the
preparation for retaining viability and competitive advantage in the mature phase.
Lifecycle Model (Kochan & Barocci Model, 1985)
Organizational agility (Dyer and Shafer 1999) Built-in capacity to flex and adapt to
changes in the external context enables the business to change as
matter of course.
Competitive Advantage Model Porter’s Generic Strategies 1985
Cost leadership Cost reduction
Differentiation Quality enhancement
Focus innovation
Competitive Advantage Model Porter’s Generic Strategies 1985
Cost leadership Focus on the delivery of efficiency through
mainly “hard” HR techniques
Differentiation Focus on the delivery of added value
through “softer” HR techniques and policies.
Focus Softer HR techniques policies for the
delivery of added value.
Competitive Advantage Model Porter’s Generic Strategies1985
Competitive Advantage Model Schuler and Jackson model Business performance will improve
when HR practices mutually reinforce the organizations choice of competitive strategy
Mission and values are expressed through their desired competitive strategy
Schuler and Jackson (1987)
Company mission and values
Desired competitive strategy(cost leadership, differentiation or focus)
Required employee behaviours(for example, extent of predictability in behaviour, degree of teamwork,
extent of concern for quality, propensity for risk-taking)
Supportive HR practices(choices in staffing, appraisal, remuneration, training etc)
HR outcomes(employee behaviour aligned with company goals)
In summary, The best-fit models argue that HR
strategy becomes more effective when it is designed to fit certain critical contingencies in the firm’s specific context.
‘Best-practice’ model
Model that advocates universalism All firms will be better off if they
identify and adopt ‘best-practice’ in the way they manage people
Major criticism: Best fit model tend to ignore
employees’ interest in the pursuit of enhanced economic performance
Sheer diversity Endangers diversity rather than
uniformity in HR strategy management
Which way is best?
Analytical distinction between the surface level of HR policy and practices in a firm and an underpinning level of processes and principles.
Surface layer: HR policies and practices – heavily influenced by context (societal, sectoral, organizational)
Underpinning layer: generic HR processes and general principles of labor management
HR issues
Management of Human Knowledge
Development of ‘learning organisations’
End of discussion.