LECT_17. Equalization (1)
-
Upload
mickyalemu -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
0
Transcript of LECT_17. Equalization (1)
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
1/23
Graduate Program
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Chapter 8: Communication Through Band-limited Channels
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
2/23
Signals Through Band-Limited Channels
• So far, we saw the design of modulator and demodulator
filters for band-limited channels• Assumption: Channel characteristic is known a priori
• However, in most communication systems, the frequencyresponse of the channel is
• Either not sufficiently known• Or it varies with time
• E.g., telephone channels, wireless channels, …
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 2Sem. I, 2012/13
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
3/23
Signals Through Band-Limited Channels
• We now consider the problem of receiver design taking:
• The presence of channel distortion and• Under the condition that the channel is AWGN and its
characteristics are not known a priori
• The channel distortion results in inter-symbol interference
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 3Sem. I, 2012/13
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
4/23
Signals Through Band-Limited Channels …
• The strategy employed to solve the ISI problem is to design
a receiver that• Compensates for the distortion introduced by the channel
• Or reduce the ISI in the received signal – Equalization
• Equalization methods
• Based on maximum likelihood (ML) sequence detectioncriterion that is optimum from error probability point of view
• Based on the use of linear filters with adjustable coefficients
• Decision-feedback equalization: Uses previously detectedsymbols to suppress the ISI in the symbol being detected
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 4Sem. I, 2012/13
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
5/23
Digital Signals over Channels with Distortion
• Consider the following transmitted signal
• Passed through the channel, the equivalent lowpass of thereceived is given by
• where we define
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 5Sem. I, 2012/13
∑+∞
−∞=
−=n
t nl nT)(t g I (t)S
z(t)nT)h(t I (t)r n
nl +−= ∑+∞
−∞=
)()()()(and )()()( t gt ct gt xt ct gt hr t t
∗∗=∗=
Gt (f) C(f) Gr (f)
z(t)
sl(t) r l(t)
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
6/23
Digital Signals Over Channels with Distortion …
• Note that the optimum demodulator can be realized as:
• A filter matched to h(t)• Followed by a sampler operating at the symbol rate 1/T and
• A subsequent processing algorithm for estimating the informationsequence {In} from the sample values
• Let us next see an optimum Maximum-Likelihood receiver
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 6Sem. I, 2012/13
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
7/23
Optimum Maximum-likelihood Receiver
• The received signal may be expanded in the series
• Where• { f k (t)} is a complete set of orthonormal functions
• {r k } are the observable random variables obtained by projectingr l(t) onto the set { f k (t)}
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 7Sem. I, 2012/13
(t) f r (t)r k
N
1k
k
N
l ∑=∞→
= lim
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
8/23
Optimum Maximum-likelihood Receiver …
• It can be shown that
• Where• hkn is the value obtained by projecting h(t-nT) onto the set { f k (t) }
• zk is the value obtained by projecting zk (t) onto f k (t)
• The sequence of {zk} is Gaussian with zero-mean andcovariance
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 8Sem. I, 2012/13
k kn
n
nk zh I r +=∑
km0m
*
k δ N } z E{z
2
1=
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
9/23
Optimum Maximum-likelihood Receiver …
• The joint probability density function of the random variable
r N ≡ {r 1 , r 2 ,…….r N } conditional on the transmitted sequence I P ≡ { I 1 ,I 2 ,…….I P} where P ≤ N is
• As the number N becomes large, the logarithm of p(r N |Ip)will be proportional to the metrics PM(Ip), defined as follows
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 9Sem. I, 2012/13
−−
= ∑ ∑
=
2 N
1k
kn
n
nk
0
N
0
p N h I r N 2
1exp
πN 2
1) I p(r
∑∑ ∫∫ ∑ ∫
∫ ∑∞
∞−
∗∗∞
∞−
∞
∞−
∗∗
∞
∞−
−−+
−+−=
−−−=
n m
mn
n
ln
2
l
2
n
nl p
dt mT)h(t nT)(t h I I dt nT)(t h(t)r I Re2dt (t)r
dt nT)h(t I (t)r )PM(I
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
10/23
Optimum Maximum-likelihood Receiver …
• The maximum likelihood estimate of the symbols I 1 ,I 2 ,…..I P
are those that maximize this quantity• However, since the integral of the square of the magnitude
of r l(t) is common to all metrics it may be discarded
• The other integral involving r l(t) gives rise to the variables
• These variables can be generated by passing r(t) througha filter matched to h(t) and sampling the output at the
symbol rate 1/T
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 10Sem. I, 2012/13
dt nT)(t h(t)r (nT) y y ln −=≡ ∗∞
∞−∫
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
11/23
Optimum Maximum-likelihood Receiver …
• The samples { yn} form a set of sufficient statistics for the
computation of PM( I p) or, equivalently, of the correlationmetrics
• Where by definition x(t) is the response of the matchedfilter to h(t ) and is given by
• x(t) represents the output of a filter having an impulseresponse h*(-t) and an excitation h(t)
• Hence, x(nt) represents the autocorrelation of h(t) sampledperiodically at the rate of 1/T
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 11Sem. I, 2012/13
∑∑∑ −∗∗ −
=
n m
mnmn
n
nn p x I I y I Re2)CM(I
dt nT)h(t (t)h x(nT) xn +=≡ ∫∞
∞−
∗
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
12/23
Optimum Maximum-likelihood Receiver …
• Substituting for r l(t)
• Where
• Note that yk is corrupted by ISI• We can reasonably assume that the ISI effects cover a
length L ≤ |n|
• The output of the modulator can be considered as the
output of a finite state machine• I.e., the channel output with ISI may be represented by a trellis
diagram
• The ML estimator of the information is the most probable paththrough the trellis give the received sequence yn
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 12Sem. I, 2012/13
k n
nk nk v x I y +=
∑ −
∫ −= ∗
dt kT)(t h z(t)vk
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
13/23
Optimum Maximum-likelihood Receiver …
• It can be shown that the correlation matrix can be
computed recursively in the Viterbi algorithm according tothe relation
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 13Sem. I, 2012/13
−−+= ∑
=−
∗−−
L
1m
mnmn0nn1n1nnn I x2 I x y2 I Re)(I CM )(I CM
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
14/23
Discrete-time Model for a Channel with ISI
• We note that:
• Transmitter sends discrete-lime symbols at a rate of 1/T• Sampled output of the matched filter at the receiver is also a
discrete-time signal with samples occurring at a rate of 1/T
• An equivalent discrete-time transversal filter having tap gaincoefficients { xk } can be used to represent the cascade of• Transmitter filter with impulse response g(t)
• Channel with impulse response c(t)
• Matched filter at the receiver with impulse response h*(-t) and
• The sampler
• Input of the filter is the sequence of information symbols{ I k } and its output is the discrete-time sequence { yk }
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 14Sem. I, 2012/13
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
15/23
Discrete-time Model for a Channel with ISI …
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 15Sem. I, 2012/13
Equivalent discrete-time model of channel with ISI
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
16/23
Discrete-time Model for a Channel with ISI
• The output of the receiver filter is given by
• The received signal sample is obtained as
• The optimum receiver is matched to h(t), that is gr (t) = h*(-t)
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 16Sem. I, 2012/13
(t)g z(t)nT) x(t I t)(g(t)r y(t) r n
nr l∗
∞
−∞=
∗ ∗+−=−∗= ∑
∑
∞
−∞= −
+==n
k k nnk v x I KT y y )(
∫∫∞
∞−
∗∞
∞−
∗ +=+= dt nT t ht zvdt nT t ht h x k n )()( ;)()(
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
17/23
Discrete-time Model for a Channel with ISI …
• The autocorrelation of the noise samples at the correlator
output is given by
• which is the correlated noise sequence at the receiver filter
output• This complicates the detection process by introducing
distortion!
• To solve the problem we use a whitening filter
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 17Sem. I, 2012/13
≤−
= −
otherwise0
L jk x N )v E(v
2
1 k j0 j
*
k
)(
X(z) H(z) I n
vn
yn vm
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
18/23
Discrete-time Model for a Channel with ISI …
• Let X(z) denote the two sided Z transform of the sampled
autocorrelation function { xk }
• Since xk =x-k *, it follows that X(z) =X*(1/z*) and the 2L roots
of X(z) have symmetry such that if ρ is a root, 1/ ρ* is also aroot
• Hence, X(z) can be factored and expressed us
• Where F(z) is a polynomial of degree L and roots ρ1, ….., ρL and F*(z-1) also has degree L and roots 1/ρ1*, ….., 1/ρL*
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 18Sem. I, 2012/13
∑−=
−= L
Lk
k
k z x X(z)
)(zF F(z) X(z) 1−∗=
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
19/23
Discrete-time Model for a Channel with ISI …
• We can now choose a whitening filter as H(z)=1/F*(z-1)
having all roots inside the unit circle resulting in aphysically realizable & stable recursive discrete-time filter
• The passage of the sequence { yk } through the whiteningfilter results in an output {vk }
• {η k } is a zero-mean white Gaussian noise sequence withvariance σ2n
• { f k } is a set of tap coefficients of an equivalent discrete-timetransversal filters with transfer functions F(z)
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 19Sem. I, 2012/13
k
L
0n
nk nk η I f v += ∑= −
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
20/23
Discrete-time Model for a Channel with ISI …
• The cascade of g(t), c(t), h*(-t), the sampler, and the
whitening filter 1/F(z-1
) is represented as an equivalentdiscrete-time transversal filter with {f n} as its tap coefficients
• The additive noise sequence {ηk} is white Gaussian noisesequence having zero mean and variance No
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 20Sem. I, 2012/13
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
21/23
Discrete-time Model for a Channel with ISI …
• Example: Consider that the
• Transmitter signal pulse g(t) has duration T and unit energy• The received signal pulse is h(t) = g(t) + ag(t-T)
• Determine the equivalent discrete-time white noise filter model
• The sampled autocorrelation function is given by
• The Z transform of xk is
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 21Sem. I, 2012/13
=
=+−=
=
∗
)1(
)0(1)1(2
k a
k ak a
x k
1) z1)(a(az
az)a(1 za
z x X(z)
1
12
1
1k
k k
++=
+++=
=
∗−
−∗
−=
−
∑
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
22/23
Discrete-time Model for a Channel with ISI …
• Assuming that |a| < 1, we can choose F(z)= az + 1
• The two tap coefficients of the transversal filter are f 0 = 1 and f 1=a
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 22Sem. I, 2012/13
Equivalent discrete-time model of ISIchannel with AWGN
-
8/19/2019 LECT_17. Equalization (1)
23/23
Assignments!
• Read the working principle of
• Linear filters with adjustable coefficients• Decision-feedback equalization
Digital Comm. – Ch. 8: Communication Through Bandlimited Channels 23Sem. I, 2012/13