Lec 11. Common Controllers Some commonly used controllers –Proportional Controller –Integration...
-
Upload
veronica-betty-farmer -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of Lec 11. Common Controllers Some commonly used controllers –Proportional Controller –Integration...
Lec 11. Common Controllers
• Some commonly used controllers– Proportional Controller– Integration Controller– Derivative Controller
• Reading: 5-8.
Design of Unity-Feedback Systems
• Objectives in designing controller C(s)– Stability (first priority)– Steady state error (static)– Time specifications (dynamic)
+
plantcontroller
Some Commonly Used Controllers
Proportional (P) controller:
Integration (I) controller:
Derivative (D) controller:
Proportional plus Integration (PI) controller:
Or combination of them, such as
Controllers using root locus & frequency-response design•Phase-lead compensator•Phase-lag compensator•Lag-lead compensator
Proportional Controller
With a proportional controller, the closed loop transfer function has a time constant:
Uncompensated plant is a first order system with time constant T
and steady state tracking error for unit step input:
+
plantcontroller
Step Responses (T=1)Step Response
Time (sec)
Am
plit
ud
e
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Without controller
Larger K will increase the response speed
A steady state error is present no matter how large K is
Remarks on P Controllers• A proportional controller does not change the system type
• For a type 0 system G(s), increasing K can only decrease the steady state position error, not eliminate it
• Stability may be an issue for higher order systems
Integration Controller
With an integration controller, the unity feedback system has closed loop transfer function that is a standard form of second order system:
+
plantcontroller
Step Responses (T=1)Step Response
Time (sec)
Am
plit
ud
e
0 2 4 6 8 10 120
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
uncompensated system
Remarks on I Controllers• A integration controller can increase the system type by 1
– For a type 0 system, the compensated system is of type 1– Hence, steady state error for step input is completely eliminated
• Compared with proportional controller, instability can be more easily caused by increasing K
PI ControllerProportional controller: increase system response without sacrificing too much on stability
Proportional plus Integration (PI) controller:
Integration controller: increase system type (thus eliminate tracking error), but may lead to instabilty
+
plantcontroller
Step Response
Time (sec)
Am
plit
ud
e
0 2 4 6 8 10 120
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Step Responses (T=1)
No steady state position error
Very fast response by increasing Kp
uncompensated system
Derivative Controller • Derivative controller C(s)=Kds
– Anticipate and correct error before it becomes too large– Add damping to the system– Highly sensitive to the error e(t)– Tend to increase the stability of the system
• Almost always used along with proportional or PI controller
+
plantcontroller
Effect on Stability
Using the proportional controller
Using the integration controller
Using the derivative controller
Ranges of K for stability:
+
plantcontroller
Example• Plant is a double integrator• Two choices for the controller C(s)
– A proportional controller
– A proportional plus derivative (PD) controller
+
plantcontroller
Proportional ControllerProportional controller
Closed loop transfer function
Step Response (J=10, Kp=1):
Step Response
Time (sec)
Am
plit
ud
e
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Changing Kp can only change the frequency of the undamped oscillation
PD ControllerProportional plus derivative controller
Closed loop transfer function is a (non-standard) second order system
Step Response (J=10, Kp=1):
Increasing the derivative component will lead to more damping in the step response, and improve the stability of the system
Step Response
Time (sec)
Am
plit
ud
e
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Step Response (J=10, Kd=10)Step Response
Time (sec)
Am
plit
ud
e
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
The improved stability caused by the derivative component allows us to choose larger gain for the proportional component, thus reducing steady state error (indirectly)
PID Controller
• A combination of proportional, integration and derivative controllers:
• Three parameters to adjust (more flexibility)• Widely used for controlling practical systems