leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being...

16
By 2030, we could live in a world free from extreme poverty in which all children have equal chances to survive and reach their full potential in life. For this to happen, mechanisms to ensure that disadvantaged groups are not left behind by progress must be embedded in the post-2015 global development framework. Stepping stone equity targets are one such mechanism. These would serve as interim benchmarks across all goal areas to ensure that disadvantaged groups are on track to achieve final targets and are catching up with more advantaged groups. By 2030, no post-2015 target should be considered met unless it is met for all. LEAVING NO ONE BEHIND Embedding equity in the post-2015 framework through stepping stone targets

Transcript of leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being...

Page 1: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

By 2030, we could live in a world free from extreme poverty in which all children have equal chances to survive and reach their full potential in life. For this to happen, mechanisms to ensure that disadvantaged groups are not left behind by progress must be embedded in the post-2015 global development framework.

Stepping stone equity targets are one such mechanism. These would serve as interim benchmarks across all goal areas to ensure that disadvantaged groups are on track to achieve final targets and are catching up with more advantaged groups.

By 2030, no post-2015 target should be considered met unless it is met for all.

leaving no one behindEmbedding equity in the post-2015 framework through stepping stone targets

Page 2: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

2

• Billions of people are being excluded from global progress, a significant proportion of whom are children.TheblindspotoftheMillenniumDevelopmentGoalstoinequalitiesmustbecorrected;itwillnotbepossibletoendextremepovertyunderthepost-2015frameworkifpeoplecontinuetobeleftbehind.

• Inequalities are not an inevitable outcome of development progress.PositivestoriesfromcountriesincludingIndonesia,BeninandPerudemonstratethatgovernmentscantakestepstoensurethatdisadvantagedchildrencatchupwiththeirmoreadvantagedpeers.

• The process to define a post-2015 sustainable development framework offers an opportunity to change the course of human history.Thenewframeworkmustincludeconcretemechanismstoensurenooneisleftbehindunderanygoal,including:– Anexplicitcommitmentthat,in2030,no target will be considered met unless

met for all groups.– Stepping stone equity targets to incentivise equitable progress across all

goal areas.Thesewouldbesetforinterimpointsbetween2015and2030,andwouldhelpensurethatdisadvantagedgroupsarecatchingupandareontracktomeet2030targets.

– Additionalmeasurestopromoteequity,including:goalstoachievegender equalityandensureopen, inclusive and accountable governance;targetstoreduce income inequality,implement policies that reduce inequalities,andhalt environmental degradation;andmechanismstomonitorequitableprogressthroughdisaggregated data,linkedtoaccountabilityandplanningprocesses.

KEy mEssagEs

Diene, age eight, crosses the dangerous border between Uganda and DRC to go to school.

Pho

To

:Jon

AT

hA

nh

yAM

s/sAv

eTh

eCh

IlDr

en

Page 3: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

3

Thepast25yearshaveseenunprecedentedprogressinpovertyreduction.Thenumberofpeoplelivinginabsolutepovertyhashalved,nearly50millionmorechildrenareinschool,and14,000morechildrensurviveeveryday.1however,whileaverageratesofprogresshavebeenimpressiveinmanycountries,billionsofpeopleacrosstheworldarebeingleftbehind.

Manyofthosebeingleftbehindarechildren,withastaggering66%ofchildrenindevelopingcountrieslivingonlessthan$2adayandoneineightchildreninoeCDcountrieslivinginrelativepoverty.2

Fewwouldarguethatachild’slifechancesshouldbedeterminedbeforetheyareborn.Butacrosstheworld,inhigh-andlow-incomecountriesalike,children’sprospectsinlifeareinlargepartdeterminedbyfactorsoutsideoftheircontrol–theirbirthplace,gender,ethnicity,socioeconomicgroup,andwhetherornottheyhaveadisability.Asaresult,significantgapsremainbetweentheworld’shavesandhave-nots,withpovertyanddisadvantagepassedfromgenerationtogeneration.

ThePosT-2015FrAMework:AwInDowoFoPPorTunITy

wecouldseeanendtoextremepovertywithinourlifetime,includinganendtopreventablechilddeaths,theeradicationofextremeincomepoverty,andensuringallchildrenareinschoolandlearning.3

Butthisvisionwillnotbeachievedifpeoplecontinuetobeleftbehind.endingextremepovertywillhingeonshiftingthetrajectoryofglobaldevelopmentontoamoreequitablepathway,ensuringthatallchildrenhaveequalchancestosurviveandthriveinlife.

Theongoingprocesstodefineanewpost-2015frameworktosucceedtheMillenniumDevelopmentGoals(MDGs)presentsanextraordinarywindowofopportunitytodrivethischange.leavingnoonebehindunderthenewframeworkwillrequireprogressforthosefurthestbehindtoaccelerateagainstabackdropofimprovementforall.systematicdisparitiesinchildren’slifechancesacrosshealth,educationandotherhumandevelopmentspheresmustclose.

sTePPInGsToneTArGeTsTosPurequITABleProGress

Toachievetheseobjectives,thepost-2015frameworkmustincludeconcretemechanismstoincentiviseshiftsinpolicyandpracticesothattheneedsofthosewhoarefurthestbehindaremetfirst,andgapsbetweenadvantagedanddisadvantagedgroupsclose.

Thisbriefingfocusesononesuchmechanism–steppingstoneequitytargets.steppingstonetargetsareinterimbenchmarksfordisadvantagedgroups,andshouldaccompany2030targetsacrossallgoalareasinthepost-2015framework.Theywouldspecifytheprogressthatdisadvantagedgroupsmustbemakingintherun-upto2030toensuretheyareontrackforachievingthefinaltargetsandarecatchingupwithmoreadvantagedgroups.By2030,notargetshouldbeconsideredmetunlessitismetforall.

steppingstonetargetswouldhelptoembedequityacrosstheentirepost-2015framework,addressinggroup-basedinequalitiesacrossalldimensionsofhumandevelopment.Assuch,theywouldcomplementadditional2030targetstodirectlytackleinequalitiesthatareparticularlydamagingtochildren,includingatargettotackleincomeinequalityandagoaltoadvancegenderequality.Together,thesemechanismswouldgearthepost-2015frameworkfirmlytowardsthepromotionofequity,helpingtorealiseourvisionofaworldinwhichnooneisleftbehind.

1 introduction

Page 4: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

4

IthaslongbeenacknowledgedthattoomanypeoplehavebeenleftbehindundertheMDGframework,particularlypoorandmarginalisedchildren.4

Monitoringprogressthroughaverageratesofchangehasmaskedinequalitiesbetweendifferentgroups.Forexample:• Ifrecenttrendsineducationcontinue,boysfrom

richfamiliesinsub-saharanAfricawillreachuniversalprimaryschoolcompletionby2021.Thepoorestgirlswillnotreachthisgoaluntil2086.5

• InequalitiesinchildmortalityratesbetweenthepoorestandrichestsectionsofsocietyhaveremainedhighindevelopingcountriesovertheMDGperiod,increasinginmorethanathirdofcountriesincludedinrecentresearch.6

• Fornutrition,improvementsinstuntingratessince1990havegenerallybeenaccompaniedbyhighandpersistinginequalities.whileahandfulofcountrieshaveachievedfasterratesofprogressforthe

poorestsectionsofsociety,anequalnumberhaveseenconsiderablyfasterprogressformoreaffluentgroups,resultingingrowinginequalities.7

Inequalityinchildren’slifechancesisnotaproblemconfinedsolelytodevelopingcountries.Intheuk,forexample,progressinreducingchildpovertyhasstalledinrecentyears,with3.5millionchildrenlivinginrelativepovertyin2012.8Ineducation,progressinlearningoutcomesfordisadvantagedchildreninbothearlyyearsandsecondaryeducationhasincreasedconsiderablysince2005.however,gapsinlearningoutcomesbetweenthesegroupshavebeenpersistent,reducingbyonlytwopercentagepointsforearlyyearsandonepercentagepointforsecondaryeducationbetween2005and2012.9

Thesetrendsareamajorcauseforconcern.Incountriesacrosstheworld,particulargroupsofchildrenarebeingexcludedfromdevelopmentprogress(seeBox1).

2 LooKing bEnEath nationaL avEragEs to EnsurE no onE is LEft bEhind

Box1:whoAreTheChIlDrenThATAreBeInGhelDBACk?

Childrenarebeingleftbehindincountriesacrosstheworldsimplybecausetheyhavebeenbornintoaparticulardisadvantagedgroup,definedbysocioeconomicbackground,gender,region,disability,orethnicorotheridentitygroup.suchinequalitiesoftenstemfromhistoricalpatternsofdiscriminationthathavesystematicallydeprivedparticulargroupsofeconomic,socialandpoliticalopportunitiesovertime.10Inmanycases,theseinequalitiesarebeingexacerbatedbyclimatechange

andenvironmentaldegradation,towhichpoorandmarginalisedgroupsareparticularlyvulnerable.11

Thosewhoarefurthestbehindtendtobemembersofmorethanonedisadvantagedgroupandsufferfrommultiple,overlappingformsofdisadvantage.Duetopervasiveanddeeplyrootedsocialnorms,womenandgirlsareoftenamongthemostdisadvantagedinanygroup,andfacethegreatestbarrierstofulfillingtheirpotential.Forexample,inBeninandPeru,asinmanycountries

continued opposite

Page 5: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

2loo

kIn

GB

eneA

Th

nA

TIo

nA

lAv

erA

GesT

oen

sur

eno

on

eIsleFTB

ehIn

D

5

acrosstheworld,genderdisadvantageoverlapswithregionaldisparitiesinaccesstoeducationandlearningoutcomes.AsFigure1shows,84%oftherichestyoungmeninthelittoralregionofBeninhadcompletedprimaryschoolin2006,comparedwithonly1%ofthepoorestwomenintheAliboriregion.12InPeru,20%ofthepoorestgirlscompletedprimaryschoolinruralareaswithabasicunderstandingofmathematics,comparedwith90%oftherichestmalesinurbanareas.13

vulnerablechildrenlivingonthemarginsofsocietyareoftentheveryfurthestbehindintermsofhealth,educationandotherdimensionsofhumandevelopment,andfaceadditionalbarriersofstigmaanddiscrimination.Theseincludechildrenlivingonthestreetorininstitutions,andwhoareengagedinhazardouslabour.orphanedchildren,forexample,are12%lesslikelytogotoschoolthantheirpeers.14Childrenwithdisabilitiesareparticularlyvulnerable,beingmorelikelytobeplacedinharmfulinstitutionalcareandtosufferfromabuse.15

whileincomepovertyisnotaninnatecharacteristicinthesamewayasbirthplaceorsex,thesocioeconomicgroupthatachildisbornintooftenhassignificantimpactsontheirlifechances.societieswithhighlevelsofincomeinequalitytendtohavelowerlevelsofsocialmobilitybecauseparentswholackdisposableincomearenotabletoinvestasmuchinchildren’shealthandeducation,orgivethemaccesstovaluablesocialnetworksandopportunities.16Inthisway,economicinequalitiesamongadultscantranslateintounequallifechancesforchildren,furtherentrenchinginequalitiesbetweengroupsthroughtheintergenerationaltransferofpoverty.

Disadvantageinearlychildhoodcanhaveknock-onimpactsthroughoutanindividual’slife–forexample,childrenwhomissoutoneducationarelesslikelytoaccessthesameeconomicopportunitiesastheireducatedpeerswhentheygrowup.17ensuringallchildrenhaveanequalstartinlifeisthereforecriticalforendingpoverty.

FIGure1:DIFFerenTIAlsInPrIMArysChoolCoMPleTIonBeTweenreGIonAl,GenDerAnDweAlThGrouPsInBenIn,2006

source:unesCoworldInequalityDatabaseoneducation

Box1continued

Alibori

0% 100%

Region

+ Gender

Alibori

Littoral

+ Wealth

Alibori, female

Alibori, male

Littoral, female

Littoral, male

littoral

Female Male

Female Male

rich

richest

richest

richest

Poorest

rich

rich

Poorest

Page 6: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

leA

vIn

Gn

oo

ne

Beh

InD

6

oPTInGForequITABleProGress

whiletoomanypeoplehavebeenleftbehindunderthepost-2015framework,theglobalpictureisnotwhollynegative.Progresshasnotalwaysbeenaccompaniedbygrowinginequalities.Forexample,intheuk,innerlondonhasrisenfromthesecond-worstperformingregionforsecondaryeducationinenglandtothesecondbestoverthepastfiveyears,andalsoachievedthelowestgapinlearningoutcomesbetweenadvantagedanddisadvantagedstudentsofallregions.18whileBangladeshiandblackAfricanstudentswerepreviouslytrailingbehindtheirwhitepeersintheenglisheducationsystem,Bangladeshistudentsarenowoutperformingwhitestudents,whileblackAfricanstudentsareachievingsimilargradestowhitestudents.19

Casesofdisadvantagedgroupsofchildrencatchingupwiththeirpeerscanalsobefoundindevelopingcountries.Forexample,Figure2showschangesinunder-fivechildmortalitysince1994intworegionsofIndonesia–lampung,arelativelybetterperformingregion,andwestnusaTenggara,aregionthatisfurtherbehind.20Figure2illustrateshowgapsbetweentheseregionshavevariedovertime,increasingatsomejuncturesanddecreasingatothers.Positively,thegaphasbeenreducinginrecentyearsandshouldcloseifrecentprogressismaintained.whereas,in1994,81morechildrenweredyinginwestnusaTenggarathaninlampungoutofevery1,000born,thisgaphasnowreducedto32.

ThereductionofdisparitiesinchildmortalityacrosssomeregionsofIndonesiareflectsexplicitcommitmenttointegratedchildhealthandprotectionwithinnationaldevelopmentplans.Thishasbeensupportedbyeffortstoachieveuniversalhealthinsuranceand,insomecases,thedecentralisationofbudgetsanddecision-making,andinitiativestoreachdisadvantagedregionsandgroups.21Thereisstillsomewaytogotoeliminatepreventablechildmortalityandinequalitiesinchildren’ssurvivalchancesinIndonesia,bothwithinandbetweenregions,andtoimprovetheimplementationofpoliciestoachievethesegoals.however,progressinsomeregionsinrecentyearshasbeensubstantial,withsomedisadvantagedchildrenstartingtocatchupwiththeirpeers.

Beninisanexampleofalow-incomecountrywhereaverageprogresshasmaskedsignificantvariationbetweenrelativelymoreandlessadvantagedsocialgroups,butwheredisadvantagedgroupsaremakingrapidprogress.Thecountryasawholehasachievedimpressivereductionsinchildmortalityinrecentdecades,from166deathsper1,000livebirthsin1996to70in2012.22however,disparitiesbetweenregionsandethnicgroupsremainhigh.Forexample,childrenintheDendiethnicgrouparestillnearlythreetimesmorelikelytodiebeforereachingtheirfifthbirthdaythanyorubachildren,with133Dendichildrendyingper1,000livebirthscomparedwith49yorubachildren(seeFigure323).

source:Dhsdata,savetheChildrencalculations24

FIGure2:TrenDsInunDer-FIveChIlDMorTAlITyInlAMPunGAnDwesTnusATenGGArA,InDonesIA

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Ch

ild M

ort

alit

y R

ate

(per

1,0

00

live

bir

ths)

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

West Nusa Tenggara

Lampung

Country (average)

Page 7: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

2loo

kIn

GB

eneA

Th

nA

TIo

nA

lAv

erA

GesT

oen

sur

eno

on

eIsleFTB

ehIn

D

7

Morepositively,theDendiethnicgroupisontracktoeliminatepreventablechilddeathsby2030.Figure3showsthetargetthresholdforlow-incomecountriesatwhichitislikelythatchildrenarenolongerdyingunnecessarilyfrompreventablecauses–25deathsper1,000livebirths.25Ifaverageratesofprogresssince1996continue,theDendiethnicgroupcouldreachthistargetby2026.Thiswouldbearemarkableachievementforadisadvantagedgroupinalow-incomecountry.however,yorubachildrencouldreachthistargettenyearsearlieriftheyalsomaintainaverageprogress.ThechallengeforBeninistofurtheraccelerateprogressforgroupsthathavehistoricallybeenleftbehindinordertoensurethatallchildrenhavegoodandequalchancesinlife.

Theseexamplesareillustrativeofthemixedglobalpictureofdifferentialsinchildren’slifechancesacrosstheworld,andthesignificantamountofworkthatremainstobedonetoensurethatnochildisleftbehindby2030.however,thefactthatgapsarestartingtoclosebetweensomegroupsdemonstratesthatrisinginequalitiesinchildren’slifechancesarenotanecessaryby-productofprogress.equitableprogressispossible.Itiswithinthepowerofgovernmentstomakepolicychoicestopursueprogressive,moreequitabledevelopmentpathways,andofdevelopmentpartnerstosupporttheseeffortsintheworld’spoorestcountries(Box2).

source:Dhsdata,savetheChildrencalculations

First-time mother, Tia, holds her newborn son at a health centre in Indonesia.

Pho

To

:DA

vID

wA

rD

ell/sAv

eTh

eCh

IlDr

en

FIGure3:TrenDsInunDer-FIveChIlDMorTAlITyAMonGTheyoruBAAnDDenDIeThnICGrouPsInBenIn

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

Ch

ild M

ort

alit

y R

ate

(per

1,0

00

live

bir

ths)

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2028

2024

2022

2030

2026

Dendi ethnic

Yoruba

National average

Target for ending preventable deaths

Maintaining average rates of progress

Page 8: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

leA

vIn

Gn

oo

ne

Beh

InD

8

Box2:shAPInGPolICIesToensureequAllIFeChAnCesForChIlDren

Theexactpoliciesrequiredtoadvanceequallifechancesforchildrenarecontext-andsector-specific,andvaryaccordingtotheprofileanddriversofinequalityineachcountryandforeachdisadvantagedgroup.however,inallcountriesitiscriticaltoensurethatdisadvantagedgroupscanaccessandusegood-qualitypublicservicesandsocialprotectionsystemsthatmeettheirneeds.

Thefocusmustbeonpursuinguniversalcoverageofessentialservicesviaequitablepathwaysthatmeettheneedsofdisadvantagedgroupsfirst.researchshowsthatlow-incomecountriesthathaveachievedrapidchangesinchildhealthundertheMDGframeworkhavedonesothroughimprovingthecoverageandqualityofessential,cost-effectiveservicesandsocialprotectionforthepoorestpeople.26Inmanycountriesthiswillrequireincreasesinthelevelandqualityofpublicinvestmentinessentialservicesandfinancialriskprotectionforserviceusers.Insomecountries,thereissignificantscopetoraisenecessaryresourcesthroughstrengthenedandmoreprogressivetaxsystems;inothers,supportforgovernmentbudgetsfromdonorswillhaveacontinuingroletoplay.27

reachingthosewhoarefurthestbehindwillalsorequiresocialnorms,discriminationandotherbarriersthatsystematicallydisadvantageparticulargroupstobetackled.stepsmustadditionallybetakentobolsteraccountabilitytothepoorestthroughimprovementsintransparency,accesstojusticeandparticipationofmarginalisedgroupsindecision-making,includingforwomenandchildren.28

Post-2015steppingstonetargetsshouldhelptoincentiviseanationalprocessnotonlytoidentifygroupsthatarebeingleftbehind,butalsotoidentifythepolicyapproachesthatwillberequiredtoensurethattargetsaremet.

Thisprocessmustbeopen,participatory,andlinkedtoglobalpost-2015accountabilitymechanismstohelpguardagainstthecontinuedexclusionofgroupssufferingfrommarginalisationanddiscrimination.The2014replenishmentoftheGlobalPartnershipforeducationprovidesagoodexampleoflinkingnationalpolicyprocessestointernationalaccountabilitymechanismstospurequitableprogress.Thisprocesssaw30governmentscommittoaddressingequityissuesandensuringthattheirbudgetsarespentinwaysthatbettermeettheeducationalneedsofthepoorestandmostmarginalisedchildren.29

Luzmila, 12, and Norma Lucy, 14, run to school, 20 kilometres from their home in Huancavelica, Peru.

Pho

To

:AleJA

nD

ro

kIr

Ch

uk

/sAv

eTh

eCh

IlDr

en

Page 9: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

9

recognitionhasgrownoverthecourseofthepost-2015processthatthenewglobaldevelopmentframeworkthatreplacestheMDGswillneedtogobeyondnationalaveragesandensurenooneisleftbehind.30

InJuly2014,thefinaloutcomeDocumentofrecommendationsfromtheunopenworkingGroup(owG)onsustainableDevelopmentGoalsidentifiedthereductionofinequalitywithinandbetweennationsasapriorityarea,withsupportfromasignificantproportionofitsmembers.31AsBrazilandnicaraguastressedintheirstatementtothe11thsessionoftheowG,thepromotionofequality“mustbecomeanacknowledgedpriorityandastructuraldimensionofthepost-2015developmentagenda”.32

Previously,inits2013reporttotheunsecretary-General,thehighlevelPanelonthepost-2015agendaidentified‘leave no one behind’asoneoffivestructuraltransformationsthatwillbenecessaryforovercomingobstaclestosustainedprosperity.ThePanelrecommendedthattargetsshouldbemonitoredusingdatadisaggregatedbyincomequintileandbyothergroups.Importantly,targetsshouldonlybeconsideredachievediftheyaremetforallrelevantincomeandsocialgroups.33

ThehighlevelPanel’srecommendationthatnotargetshouldbeconsideredmetunlessmetforallwouldhelptoestablishthepromotionofequityasapost-2015objective,andmustbeadoptedaspartofthefinalpost-2015agreement.however,byitself,thisno target met unless met for allcriterionwouldnotprovidesufficientpolicyincentivesforgovernments

tomaketheurgentchangesinpolicyandpracticethatwillberequiredtoensuredisadvantagedgroupsachieve2030targets.34As2030isalongtimeawayandwilllikelyseedifferentadministrationsincharge,thereisadangerthatcurrentgovernmentswillcontinuetotaketheeasierrouteofservinggroupsthatareeasiesttoreach,ratherthanthemoredifficultrouteofservingtheneedsofthosewhoarehardesttoreach.Thisposestheriskthatdisadvantagedgroupswillcontinuetobeleftbehind.

Moreover,theno target met unless met for allcriterioncouldalsobesatisfiedunderascenarioofgrowinginequalityinchildren’slifechances.Thisistrueforfractionaltargetsthatdonotaimforthecompleteeliminationofdimensionsofpovertyby2030(forexample,atargettoreducestuntingby50%).Itisalsotruefortargetstoreducedisadvantagebeloworaboveminimumglobalthresholds,suchastheminimumglobalthresholdforendingpreventablechildmortality(25childdeathsper1,000livebirths),orthresholdsforminimumlearningoutcomesineducation.evenifallgroupsmetthesethresholds,gapsbeloworabovethemwouldcontinuetogrowifdisadvantagedgroupsarenotmakingsufficientprogresstocatchupwiththemostadvantagedgroups.

Asthepost-2015processreachesitsfinalstages,thechallenge,then,isnotonlytocontinuetobuildconsensusontheneedforastrongfocusonequity,butalsotodefineconcretemechanismstotranslatethisconsensusintoactionacrossallgoalareasofthenewframework.savetheChildrenpresentedanumberofsuchmechanismsinFramework for the Future,ourproposalsforpost-2015goals,targets,indicators(seeBox3).35

3 stEpping stonE targEts: a mEchanism to EnsurE no onE is LEft bEhind

Page 10: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

leA

vIn

Gn

oo

ne

Beh

InD

10

oneproposalthathaspotentialforsignificantimpactandthatwouldmainstreamthepromotionofequityacrossallgoalareasofthepost-2015frameworkisforinterimequity,dubbedsteppingstonetargets.Initiallyproposedbywatkins(2014),thesetargetscouldbesetforinterimtimeperiodsbetween2015and2030andwouldaimtonarrowdisparitiesinbasiclifechancesbetweendifferentsocialandeconomicgroups.36watkinsproposes,forexample,thatinterimtargetscouldbesettohalvethedeathrategapbetweentherichestandthepoorest,ornarrowlearninggapsbetweenruralgirlsandurbanboys.

Throughfocusingimmediateandongoingattentionontheprogressofthosewhoarefurthestbehind,suchtargetswouldhelptostrengthenthepost-2015highlevelPanel’srecommendationthatnotargetshouldbeconsideredmetunlessmetforallrelevantsocialandeconomicgroups.

Gapreductionisimportant,notleasttoensureallchildrenhaveequalchancesinlife.however,itmustbepursuedinwaysthathelptomaintainoverall

progressandensuretheattainmentof2030goalsforallgroups.Itshouldnotbeachievedthroughmoreadvantagedgroupsgoingbackwards.Forthisreason,steppingstonetargetsshouldhavethreeinterconnectedobjectives:37

1) Maintainfastaverageprogressatthenationallevel.

2) ensurethatdisadvantagedgroupsareontracktoachieve2030targets.

3) reducegapsinhumandevelopmentoutcomesthatstemfromsystematicdifferencesinlifechancesbetweengroupsofchildren.Thisshouldresultfromfasterprogressbydisadvantagedgroups,ratherthanregressionbymoreadvantagedgroups.

steppingstonetargetsshouldbedefinedatthenationallevelfordisadvantagedandmarginalisedgroupsthatarethefurthestbehind,identifiedthroughanopenandparticipatoryprocess(seeBox4).Theyshouldbesetforsocial,economicandenvironmentalgoalareas,takingintersectingformsofdisadvantageintoaccount.

Box3:sAveTheChIlDren’sProPosAlsForADvAnCInGequITyThrouGhThePosT-2015FrAMework

Thisbriefingfocusesonsteppingstoneequitytargetsasanessentialmechanismforpromotingequitableprogressunderthepost-2015framework.ThisisoneofseveralproposalsforadvancingequitythatsavetheChildrenpresentedinFramework for the Future.othermechanismsinclude:• A standalone goal to achieve gender

equality,withtargetstoendgender-basedviolence,realisesexualandreproductivehealthandrights,advancewomen’sandgirls’economicempowerment,andensureequalparticipationandinfluenceinprivateandpubliclife.

• A standalone goal to ensure open, inclusive and accountable governancetoeliminateinequitiesinpublicparticipation,bolsteraccountabilitytomarginalisedgroupsandensureeffectiveinstitutionsthatprovideequalaccesstogood-qualitypublicservices.

• A target to reduce income inequality and relative poverty.

• Goals and targets to drive forward action on policy areas that are known to reduce inequalities,includinguniversalhealthcoverage,education,socialprotection,childprotectionanduniversalregistrationatbirth.

• Data disaggregation,attheminimumbyage,ethnicity,gender,geography,disabilityand,socioeconomicgrouptoimproveunderstandingofwhichgroupsarebeingleftbehindandtobolsteraccountability.

• Targets to reduce international inequalities,includingthroughactiontoendillicitfinancialflowsandreforminternationalinstitutions.

Forfurtherdetail,seesavetheChildren(2014)Framework for the Future.

Page 11: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

3sTePPIn

GsT

on

eTAr

GeT

s:AM

eCh

An

IsMT

oen

sur

eno

on

eIsleFTB

ehIn

D

11

IllusTrATInGThesTePPInGsToneConCePT

sowhatshouldasteppingstoneequitytargetlooklikeinpractice?Forpurposesofillustration,Figure4showsregionaldifferentialsinmalnutritionratesinPeru,measuredthroughthepercentageofchildrenagedunderfivewhoarestunted.Itisclearfromthisgraphthattheaveragerateofprogressmasksconsiderableregionalinequalities.huancavelica,theregionwiththehigheststuntingrates,isoneofPeru’smostremoteregionsintheAndeanmountains,withalargeindigenouspopulation.Incontrast,limaregionhousesthecountry’scapitalcity,togetherwithasignificantproportionofthecountry’smostaffluentgroupsandgoodcoverageofhealthandsocialservices.38Peru’snationalaveragestuntingrateamongchildrenunderfivewas18%in2012.however,inhuancavelicastuntingrateswereashighas47%,comparedwith6%inlima.

ThesetrendsarerootedinahistoryofhighandpersistentregionalinequalitiesinPeru.however,Figure4showsthefruitsofrecenteffortsbythePeruviangovernmentandsocietytoreversedecadesofneglectandmarginalisationofcommunitiesinremoteAndeanregions.reductionsinthestuntingrateinhuancavelicaaccelerateddramaticallybetween2006and2012,falling11percentagepoints

comparedwithareductionofonlytwopercentagepointsthepreviousdecade,andkeepingpacewithaverageratesofchange.Thiswasachievedthroughimprovementsinthecoverageandqualityofhealth,nutritionandsocialprotectionservices,driventhroughincreasedinvestment;measurestostrengthencoordinationacrosssocial,financialandagriculturalsectors;andresults-basedfinancingfordecentralisedprogrammes.39

whilerecenttrendsinstuntingratesarepositive,thereisstillsomewaytogotoensurethatchildreninPeruhaveequallifechances,nomatterwheretheylive.Achildinhuancavelicaisstillnearlyeighttimesmorelikelytobestuntedthanachildinlima,andisovertwiceaslikelytodiebeforetheirfifthbirthdaythananaveragePeruvianchild.

savetheChildrenhasproposedthatatargetofatleasthalvingstuntingratesshouldbeincludedinthepost-2015framework.40Thistargetwouldbeachievedby2030atthenationallevelinPeruthroughmaintainingtheaveragerateofprogressachievedsince1996,bringingthestuntingratedownfrom18%to3%.Incontrast,a50%reductiontargetwillbemoreofachallengeforhuancavelica.here,meetingthetargetwouldrequirestuntingratestofallfromthecurrentlevelof47%to24%by2030.AsFigure4illustrates,iftheregionsimplymaintainstheaverageprogressithasachievedsince1996,itwillmissthis

FIGure4:TrenDsInsTunTInGInThereGIonsoFhuAnCAvelICAAnDlIMA,Peru

source:Dhsdata,savetheChildrencalculations

Per

cen

tage

mal

nu

trit

ion

pre

vale

nce

in s

tun

tin

g

(hei

ght

for

age)

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

1996

2000

2006

2012

2022

2030

2030 national target

2030 target for Huancavelica

Maintainingaverageprogresssince2006

Maintainingaverageprogresssince1996

Huancavelica Region (disadvantaged group)

Lima Region (advantaged group)

Peru (average)

2022 stepping stone target for Huancavelica

Page 12: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

FIGure5:IllusTrATIvesTePPInGsToneTArGeTForChIlDMorTAlITyInBenIn

leA

vIn

Gn

oo

ne

Beh

InD

12

targetbyeightpercentagepoints.however,ifthemorerapidratesofprogressachievedsince2006aremaintainedthetargetwouldbemetaheadofschedulearound2025.

Countriesmustsetsteppingstonetargetscarefullyaccordingtolocalcontext,takingintoaccountwhyparticulargroupsarebeingleftbehind,historicaltrends,andtheprogressthatwillbeneededforallgroupstoachieve2030targets.TheaimofinterimsteppingstonetargetsinthisexamplefromPerushouldbetohelpmaintainthemomentumofprogressinhuancavelica,andensurethatthefinal2030targetismetontime.Inordertostrikeabalancebetweenambitionandfeasibility,areasonablesteppingstonetargetfor2022inhuancavelicamightbeset,forexample,atamaximumstuntingrateof34%.Thiswouldallowforsomedecelerationofprogressduetopeoplewhoareyettobecoveredbynutritionandotherservicesandprogrammesbeingthehardesttoreach.41however,itwouldstillensurethattheregionisontrackforachievingthe203050%reductiontarget,andwouldlikelyseehuancavelicacatchingupwithmoreadvantagedregions.

TAIlorInGTArGeTsToConTexT

Asimilarapproachcouldbefollowedtoidentifysteppingstoneequitytargetsinothercountries,includingtheexamplesofBeninandIndonesiadiscussedearlierinthispaper(seeFigure5foranillustrativesteppingstoneinBenin).Inthese

examples,theaimofsteppingstonetargetswouldbetoensurethatrecentratesofprogressaremaintainedinordertoachieve2030targets.however,indifferentcountriesandsectors,steppingstoneswillneedtobesettoaccelerateprogress.Forexample,reductionsinstuntingratesacrosstheworldhaveonthewholebeenslowerthanforchildmortalityduetothecomplexdriversofmalnutritionanditsrelativeneglectwithindevelopmentpolicyandpractice.42InIndonesia,stuntingratesactuallyincreasedinthepoorestquintileofthepopulationbetween2007and2010againstabackdropofoverallnationalimprovement.43Beninsawaveragestuntingratesincreasebetween1996and2006,accompaniedbyanincreaseinthegapbetweenthepoorest40%andrichest10%ofninepercentagepoints.44

Insectorsandcaseslikethese,steppingstonetargetswillneedtobemoreambitious,usheringastepchangeinprogressforthemostdisadvantagedgroups.Donorsanddevelopmentpartnershaveparticularresponsibilitytosupportdevelopingcountrygovernmentstoachieveambitioustargets.ensuringnooneisleftbehindunderthepost-2015frameworkisasharedglobalresponsibility.

Toensurethatsteppingstonetargetsareaseffectiveandfeasibleaspossible,anumberofpracticalandtechnicaldetailswillneedtobeworkedthrough(seeBox4).however,dataandinstitutionsarecurrentlystrongenoughinmanycountriestocommencetheprocessofdefiningsteppingstones,andincorporatingthemintonationaldevelopmentplans.

Benin (ethnic groups)

Dendi: 133/1,000

Yoruba: 49/1,000

Child mortality has fallen to no more than 70 deaths per 1,000 live births among Dendi children, and the gap between Dendi and Yoruba children has narrowed.

Child mortality is no more than 25 deaths per 1,000 live births in any group and gaps between groups have closed.

Post-2015 target: End preventable child deaths (Preventable mortality threshold for developing countries: 25 deaths per 1,000 live births)

2012 child mortality rates

2022 stepping stone

2030: No target met unless met for all

Page 13: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

3sTePPIn

GsT

on

eTAr

GeT

s:AM

eCh

An

IsMT

oen

sur

eno

on

eIsleFTB

ehIn

D

13

Box4:DeFInInGAnDIMPleMenTInGsTePPInGsTones–soMePrACTICAlConsIDerATIons

• Poor-quality data and a lack of disaggregationmakeitdifficulttoidentifygroupslaggingbehind,particularlythosesufferingfromintersectinginequalitiesandfromsocialexclusion.Governments,donorsandinternationalinstitutionsmustinvesturgentlyinthepost-2015‘datarevolution’toensurethatprogressforallgroupscanbemonitoredandreportedassoonaspossible.

• For purposes of illustration the examples of stepping stone targets in this briefing focus on a single mid-point date of 2022.however,steppingstonescouldbesetforadditionaldatesbetween2015and2030tostrengthentheircontributiontopost-2015monitoringandaccountability,potentiallyatthree-tofive-yearintervalstoalignwithpoliticalcycles.

• Reporting on progress for disadvantaged groups is highly politicalinmanycontexts,particularlywhereinequalitiesstemfromdeeplyrootedsocialnormsorentrenchedpatternsofexclusionthatarekeepingcertaingroupslockedinpoverty.Insomecases,themostmarginalisedgroupsinsocietyarenotpubliclyrecognisedorcountedwithincensuses,effectivelyrenderingtheminvisible.

• Processes to define and monitor stepping stones should therefore be open, inclusive and participatory,includingrepresentationfromabroadcross-sectionofcivilsociety.Theyshouldalsobelinkedtobothnationalandinternationalpost-2015monitoringandaccountabilitysystems,workinginsynergywithinternationalhumanrightsmechanisms.

• Work will be required to identify the most appropriate baselines, metrics and benchmarks for defining stepping stonesatnationallevels,andtoassessoptionsforglobalsteppingstonesandmonitoring.

Marco Antonio, age eight, lighting a candle in his house in Huancavelica, Peru.

Pho

To

:AleJA

nD

ro

kIr

Ch

uk

/sAv

eTh

eCh

IlDr

en

Page 14: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

14

Thepost-2015frameworkpresentsasignificantopportunitytoputtheworldonamoreequitableandsustainablepathwaytodevelopmentandprosperityforall.worldleadersmustseizethisopportunity,makinguseofeverytoolattheirdisposaltoensurethatthenewframeworkcreatesincentivesforgovernmentsandthewiderdevelopmentcommunitytoreachthosebeingleftbehind.

steppingstoneequitytargetsareacriticalpartofthispost-2015equitytoolset.Theywouldplaceimmediatefocusongapsinprogressbetweenadvantagedanddisadvantagedchildrenacrossallgoalareas,andestablishclearcommitmentstoaccelerateprogressforgroupsthatarefurthestbehindacrossthemultipledimensionsofhumandevelopment.

Tomaximisethecapacityofthenewframeworktoadvanceequityandprosperityforall,steppingstonesmustalsobeaccompaniedbytargetstotackle

inequalitiesthatcutacrossgroupsandsocieties,andtoaddressbarrierstoequallifechancesforchildren.Theseincludeextremeincomeinequality,whichrestrictspoorfamilies’abilitytoinvestintheirchildren;discriminationagainstgirlsandwomen;andenvironmentaldegradationthatunderminesthelivelihoods,healthandwell-beingoftheworld’spoorestpeople.Inaddition,agoalmustbeincludedinthenewframeworktofosteropen,inclusiveandaccountablegovernance;aworldinwhichnooneisleftbehindwilldependongovernmentsbeingaccountableandresponsivetotheneedsofthepoorestandmostmarginalisedpeople.

Deployedtogether,thesemechanismswouldhelptoembedequityattheveryheartofthepost-2015framework,spurringprogresstowardstheultimategoal:aworldfreefrompovertyinwhichallchildrenhaveequalchancestothriveandreachtheirfullpotentialinlife.

4 concLusions

reCoMMenDATIons

Asgovernmentsacrosstheworldworktogethertobuildthepost-2015framework,theymustmaintainastrongfocusonequityandensurethatconcretemechanismstospurequitableprogressareestablishedwithinthenewframework.Thesemustinclude:• An explicit commitment that no target

will be considered met unless met for all groups.

• Stepping stone equity targets to incentivise equitable progress across all goal areas.Thesewouldbesetforinterim

pointsbetween2015and2030,andwouldhelpensurethatdisadvantagedgroupsarecatchingupandareontracktomeet2030targets.

• standalonegoalstoachievegender equalityandensureopen, inclusive and accountable governance,plustargetstoreduce income inequality,implement policies that reduce inequalities,andtackle environmental degradation.

• Mechanismstomonitorequitableprogressthroughdisaggregated data.

Page 15: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

15

1un(2014)The Millennium Development Goals Report 2014.newyork:un.2relativepovertydefinedaschildrenlivinginhouseholdswithaverageincomesbelow50%ofthemedianincome.unICeF(2014)Child Poverty in the post-2015 Agenda.newyork:unICeF.3savetheChildren(2013)Getting to Zero: How we can be the generation that ends poverty.london:savetheChildren.4see,forexample,Minujin,A.andDelamonica,e.(2003)‘Mindthegap!wideningchildmortalitydisparities’,Journal of Human Development4(3),november2003;MillenniumProject(2005)Investing in Development: A practical plan to achieve the Millennium Development Goals.newyork:unDP;unICeF(2010)Progress for Children: Achieving the MDGs with equity.newyork:unICeF;savetheChildren(2010)A Fair Chance at Life: Why equity matters for child mortality.london:savetheChildren.5educationForAllGlobalMonitoringreport(2014)Teaching and Learning: Achieving quality for all.Paris:unesCo6wagstaff,A,Bredenkamp,C.andBuisman,l.(2014)‘ProgressonGlobalhealthGoals:arethePoorBeingleftBehind?’The World Bank Research Observer,vol.29(2),p1–26.AdvanceAccesspublishedJuly28,2014.Thisstudyfoundthat,whileprogressonMDGinterventionindicatorshasbeenonthewholepro-poor,relativeinequalityinunder-fivechildmortalityrateshasincreasedin39%ofcountriesincludedintheresearch,andinfantmortalityin51%.7Bredenkamp,C.,Buisman,l.andvandePoel,e.(2014)‘Persistentinequalitiesinchildundernutrition:evidencefrom80countries,from1990totoday.’International Journal of Epidemiology,2014,1–8.8Afterhousingcostshavebeenpaid.Childpovertyisdefinedintheukaschildrenlivinginhouseholdswithlessthan60%ofmedianincome.DepartmentforworkandPensions(2013)Households Below Average Income: 1994/95 to 2011/12.9Datareferstochildreninengland.‘secondaryeducation’referstoGCseexaminationgrades(studentsaged15–16),andearlyyearseducationreferstoeducationforchildrenunderagefive.FiguresfromoFsTeD(2013).Unseen children: Access and achievement 20 years on: Evidence report.london:oFsTeD.10kabeer,n.(2010)Can the MDGs provide a pathway to social justice? The challenges of intersecting inequalities.newyork/Brighton:unMDGAchievementFundandInstituteofDevelopmentstudies.

stewart,Frances(2011)Approaches towards Inequality and Inequity: Concepts, measures and policies.InnocentiworkingPaperno.2013-10.Florence:unICeF.11unDP(2011)Human Development Report: Sustainability and Equity: a better future for all.newyork:unDP.12youngpeopleaged15–24whohavecompletedprimaryschool.unesCowIDedata.unesCo(2014)worldInequalityDatabaseoneducation,www.education-inequalities.org/13unesCowIDedata.unesCo(2014)worldInequalityDatabaseoneducation,www.education-inequalities.org/14west,A.andDelap,e.(2012)Protect My Future: The links between child protection and equity.FamilyforeveryChildandendorsingagencies.15Ibid.16see,forexample,Greenstone,M.,looney,A.,Patashnik,J.andyu,M.(2013)Thirteen economic facts about social mobility and the role of education.ThehamiltonProjectPolicyMemo,June2013;Corak,M.(2013),‘Inequalityfromgenerationtogeneration:Theunitedstatesincomparison’inrycroft,r.(ed)The Economics of Inequality, Poverty, and Discrimination in the 21st Century,ABC-ClIo.Forin-depthanalysisoftheimpactsofincomeinequalityonchildrenseesavetheChildren(2012)Born Equal: How reducing inequality could give our children a better future.17savetheChildren(2013)Food for thought: Tackling child malnutrition to unlock potential and boost prosperity.london:savetheChildren.18AssessedthroughGCseexaminations(keystage4,studentsaged15–16).Allfiguresareforengland.oFsTeD(2013)op.Cit.seeChapter5foradiscussionofpolicyinitiativesthathavehelpedtospurmoreequitableprogressinsomeregions,includingarea-basedinitiativessuchasthelondonChallengeprogramme.19oFsTeD(2013)op.Cit.20savetheChildrenanalysisusingDhsdata.regionsthatarethefurthestaheadandbehindintermsofchildmortalityrateshavechangedovertimeinIndonesia.Theseregionswereselectedforcomparisonastheyhaveconsistentlybeenamongthebestandworstperformingregions.Forfurtherdiscussionofdataissuesandthetechnicalconstructionofsteppingstonetargetsseekite,G.,roche,J.M.andwise,l.(2014)‘Buildingapost-2015frameworkthatleavesnoonebehind:Aproposaltoincentiviseinclusiveprogress’.21sMeru(2010)Child Poverty and Disparities in Indonesia: Challenges for inclusive growth.Jakarta:sMeru,unICeFandBAPPenAs;Thomas,D.andyusran,s.(2013)Social Development Analysis to Support the Design of a Future Maternal and Newborn Health Program in Indonesia, PERMATA.Canberra:AusAIDhealthresourceFacility.22AllfiguresfromsavetheChildrenanalysisofDhsdata.seenote24.23savetheChildrenanalysisofDhsdata.notethattheslopeofthegraphbetween1996and2006fortheDendiethnicgrouprepresentsasmoothedlinebetweenDhsdatapointsowingtoadiscrepancyintheDhsdatafor2001,likelycausedbythesamplesizebeingtoosmallforthatyear.Thenationalaverageisbelowthatfortheyorubagroupin1996as

therankingofgroupshaschangedovertime.Forfurthermethodologicaldiscussion,seetechnicalpaper(detailsinnote24).24ThechildmortalityrateestimateswereobtainedfromdirectdataprocessingofDemographichealthsurveysusingthefullbirthhistorymethod.Finalestimatescorrespondtofiveyearsprecedingthesurvey.Projectionsarebasedonalinearextrapolationofcurrenttrendsforillustrativepurposes.Inrealityratesofchangewouldlikelyslowdownaschildmortalityratesdiminish.(see,forexample,klasen,s.andlange,s.(2012)Getting Progress Right: Measuring progress towards the MDGs against historical trends.CourantresearchCentreDiscussionPaperno.87,February2012.)Forfurtherdiscussionofdataissuesandthetechnicalconstructionofsteppingstonetargetsseekite,G.,roche,J.M.andwise,l.(2014)‘Buildingapost-2015frameworkthatleavesnoonebehind:Aproposaltoincentiviseinclusiveprogress’.25This2030targethasbeenproposedbythePartnershipforMaternal,newbornandChildhealth.Ifachieved,itwouldputcountriesontracktoachievetheestablishedinternationalChildsurvivalCalltoActiontargetforanationalchildmortalityrateofnomorethan25deathsper1,000livebirthsby2035.seehttp://www.who.int/pmnch/about/governance/partnersforum/communique/en/26Countdownto2015(2013)Accountability for Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival: 2013 update.Forexample,onestudyfoundthatmoreequitablefinancingofhealthservicescouldallow13additionalcountriestoachieveMDG4onchildmortality.seerockefellerFoundation,savetheChildren,unICeFandwho(2013)Universal Health Coverage: A commitment to close the gap.london:savetheChildren.27CenterforeconomicandsocialrightsandChristianAid(2014)A Post-2015 Fiscal Revolution – A Human Rights Policy Brief.newyork:Cesr;savetheChildren(2014)Tackling Tax.london:savetheChildren.28Forfurtherdiscussion,seesavetheChildren(2013)Getting to Zero: How we can be the generation that ends poverty.london:savetheChildren.29GlobalPartnershipforeducation(2014)Pledge Report from GPE Replenishment Conference,June2014.30seeunsystemTaskTeam(2013)A New Global Partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development.newyork:unitednations;unDG(2013)A Million Voices: The world we want.newyork:unDG;highlevelPanelonthePost-2015DevelopmentAgenda(2013)A New Global Partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development.newyork:un;openworkingGrouponsustainableDevelopmentGoals(2014)outcomeDocument.newyork:un.31outcomeDocumentoftheopenworkingGrouponsustainableDevelopmentGoals,July2014.Availableathttp://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/focussdgs.html(accessed29July2014).32statementbynicaraguaandBrazil–11thsessionoftheopenworkingGrouponsustainableDevelopmentGoals,5–9May,2014.Availableathttp://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/8750brazil2.pdf(accessed20July2014).33highlevelPanelonthePost-2015DevelopmentAgenda(2013)op.Cit.34watkins,k.(2014)‘leavingnoonebehind:anagendaforequity’.The Lancet,earlyonlinePublication,9May2014.35savetheChildren(2014)Framework for the Future.london:savetheChildren.seealsoMelamed,C.(2012)Putting Inequality in the Post-2015 Picture.london:oDI.36watkins,k.(2014)‘leavingnoonebehind:anagendaforequity’.The Lancet,earlyonlinePublication,9May2014.othershavealsosuggestthatspecifictargetscouldbesetunderthepost-2015frameworkforprogressamongthepoorest,butdonotbuildagap-reductioncomponentintotheirproposals.seeMelamedop.cit.andunICeF/unwomen(2013)Addressing Inequalities: Synthesis report of global public consultation.37ThemethodologypresentedherefollowsproposalspresentedinsavetheChildren(2014)Framework for the Future.seealsoproposalsfromthewho/unICeFJointMonitoringProgrammeforwatersupplyandsanitation:unICeF/whoJMP(2013)Post-2015 WASH targets and indicators: outcomes of an expert consultation.38Franke,P.(2013)Peru’s comprehensive health insurance and new challenges for universal coverage.unICostudiesseries11.washingtonDC:worldBank.39unICeF(2013)Improving Child Nutrition: The achievable imperative for global progress.newyork:unICeF.40Thisisinlinewiththeworldhealthorganizationtargettoachievea40%reductionby2025–anambitious,stretchtarget.seesavetheChildren(2012)Global stunting reduction target: Focus on the poorest or leave millions behind.london:savetheChildren;savetheChildren(2014)op.Cit.41questionsoffeasibilityshouldbeconsideredaspartoftheprocesstodefinesteppingstonetargets.researchshowsthatratesofreductiontendtoslowascountriesmakeprogress.see,forexample,klasen,s.andlange,s.(2012)Getting Progress Right: Measuring progress towards the MDGs against historical trends.CourantresearchCentreDiscussionPaperno.87,February2012.42seeThe Lancet Child and Maternal Nutrition Series,6June2013,availableat:http://www.thelancet.com/series/maternal-and-child-nutrition(accessed20July2014).43IndonesianationalBasichealthsurvey(rIskesDAs)data,citedinsavetheChildren(2012)op.Cit.44savetheChildrencalculationsusingDhsdata.

rEfErEncEs

Page 16: leaving no one behind - Resource Centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being left behind. Many of those being left behind are children, with a staggering 66%

Co

ver

Pho

To

:heD

Inn

hA

llDo

rsso

n/sA

veT

heC

hIlD

ren

savethechildren.org.uk

Save the Children works in more than 120 countries. We save children’s lives. We fight for their rights. We help them achieve their potential.

savetheChildren1stJohn’slanelondoneC1M4ArTel:+44(0)2070126400Fax:+44(0)2070126963

©ThesavetheChildrenFund2014

ThesavetheChildrenFundisacharityregisteredinenglandandwales(213890)andscotland(sC039570).registeredCompanyno.178159