Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

16
Karen Draney (University of California, Berkeley) Lindsey Mohan (Michigan State University) Philip Piety (University of Michigan) Jinnie Choi (University of California, Berkeley) 2007 AERA Annual Meeting, Chicago Symposium on Learning Progressions April 12, 2007

description

Karen Draney (University of California, Berkeley) Lindsey Mohan (Michigan State University) Philip Piety (University of Michigan) Jinnie Choi (University of California, Berkeley) 2007 AERA Annual Meeting, Chicago Symposium on Learning Progressions April 12, 2007. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

Page 1: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

Karen Draney (University of California, Berkeley)Lindsey Mohan (Michigan State University)Philip Piety (University of Michigan)Jinnie Choi (University of California, Berkeley)

2007 AERA Annual Meeting, ChicagoSymposium on Learning Progressions

April 12, 2007

Page 2: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

Overview of the Carbon Cycle project

Applying the BEAR Assessment System Theories around the Carbon Cycle progress variables Qualitative differences among student responses Describing & revising the levels More complications

Next Steps

2007 AERA Annual Meeting 2

Page 3: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

Environmental Science Literacy Project▪ Funded by National Science Foundation▪ The goal is to integrate Environmental Science Literacy into

contemporary K-12 curriculum▪ Expected products are 1) research-based learning

progressions, 2) assessment resources, and 3) teaching resources

Big Ideas▪ Environmental science literacy▪ Learning progressions

▪ Upper elementary (4th grade) – High school

▪ Progress variables

2007 AERA Annual Meeting 3

Page 4: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

Working groups▪ Carbon cycle/ Water cycle/ Biodiversity and evolution/

Connecting actions

We are now…▪ Developing learning progressions▪ Qualitatively analyzing assessment items and student

responses▪ Designing additional items▪ Developing accompanying teaching modules▪ Conducting teaching experiments

2007 AERA Annual Meeting 4

Page 5: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

Environmentally literate students are expected to be able to

apply fundamental principles to processes in coupled human and natural systems

Focuses of the Carbon Cycle project ▪ Systems: coupled human and natural systems▪ Processes: generation, modification, and oxidation of

organic carbon▪ Principles for scientific accounts: structure of systems,

tracing matter, tracing energy, change over time

2007 AERA Annual Meeting 5

Progress Variables

Page 6: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

Connections between progress variables and environmental science literacy

What is a connection between a car driving down the road, a tree growing in a forest, and global warming?

2007 AERA Annual Meeting 6

CO2CO2CO2 CO2

Page 7: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

Example: Tracing Matter Grandma Johnson (GRANJOHN)

Describe the path of a carbon atom from Grandma Johnson’s remains, to inside the leg muscle of a coyote. NOTE: The coyote does not dig up and consume any part of Grandma Johnson’s remains.

2007 AERA Annual Meeting 7

?

Page 8: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

Grandma Johnson

Plants

Decomposers

Herbivores

Coyote

Organic carbon

Organic carbon

Organic carb

on

Carbon dioxide

Generation of organic carbon- Photosynthesis

Modification of organic carbon - Food Chain

Oxidation of organic carbon

- Cellular Respiration

Page 9: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

CRD does not have understanding of key processes: the process are very physical

CRD Identify changes by common sense of natural phenomena, but not as changes in materials and does not identify material kinds.

CRD: “A carbon atom from Grandma Johnson's remains sink into the ground and mixes with the soil. Then when the soil is mixed and churned, it rises to the top of the ground. When the coyote kills something upon that dirt, he may consume it and have some of the soil come with it, which produces him with Grandma Johnson's carbon atom.”

2007 AERA Annual Meeting

Grandma Johnson

Plants

Decomposers

Herbivores

Coyote

Soil

Page 10: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

MCK describes the movement of carbon atom not necessarily through decomposers, but through a food chain.

MCK pays attention to hidden mechanism, but does not identify any material kinds.

MCK: “The carbon in grandma body is decomposed into the ground. The plants then use the fertile soil to use her carbon atoms. As the soil passes it to the plant, the plant is eventually eaten by the coyote. The carbon atom then travels to its leg.”

2007 AERA Annual Meeting

Grandma Johnson

Plants

Decomposers

Herbivores

Coyote

Soil

Page 11: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

DES: “Grandma Johnson's remains decay and decomposers use respiration and turn it to carbon dioxide. The plants absorb the carbon dioxide. Rodents eat the plants and then the coyote eats the rodent.”

2007 AERA Annual Meeting

DES traces carbon atom through decomposers, photosynthesis, and food chain

DES correctly identifies reactants and products of individual chemical processes: identifies carbon dioxide, but not the organic carbon compounds in living organisms.

Grandma Johnson

Plants

Decomposers

Herbivores

Coyote

Carbon dioxide

Page 12: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

CHARACTERISTICS OF RESPONSES

2007 AERA Annual Meeting 12

o CRD does not have understanding of key processes: the process are very physicalo CRD Identify changes by common sense of natural phenomena, but not as changes in materials and does not identify material kinds.

Tracing Matter: Material Kinds, Properties of Matter

7Correctly characterizes reactants and products of all processes in terms of how they affect organic carbon compounds

6

Correctly identifies reactants and products of individual chemical processes: Substances/molecules and the elements/atoms of which they are composed.

5Correctly identifies some reactants and products of single chemical process, and solids, liquids, and gases involved.

4Correctly identifies some reactants and products of single chemical process, and solids, liquids, but not gases involved.

3 Attention to hidden mechanism, but cannot identify any material kinds

2Identify changes by common sense of natural phenomena, but not as changes in materials and cannot identify material kinds.

1 Egocentric/Naturalistic Reasoning: Respondents use human analogy to explain the changes in materials

oMCK describes the movement of carbon atom not necessarily through decomposers, but through a food chain.oMCK pays attention to hidden mechanism, but does not identify any material kinds.

◦ DES traces carbon atom through decomposition, photosynthesis, and food chain◦ DES correctly identifies reactants and products of individual chemical processes: identifies carbon dioxide, but not the organic carbon compounds in living organisms.

Page 13: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

2007 AERA Annual Meeting 13

Page 14: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

PROCESSES MATERIAL KINDS

14

EventsEvents

Hidden mechanismsHidden mechanisms

Incomplete descriptions of chemical reactions

Incomplete descriptions of chemical reactions

Complete chemical reactionin single organism

Complete chemical reactionin single organism

Not identifying materialsNot identifying materials

Recognizing materials are made of smaller parts

Recognizing materials are made of smaller parts

Recognizing some reactants and products, such as CO2

Recognizing some reactants and products, such as CO2

Recognizing complete reactants and products, including organic materials

in processes

Recognizing complete reactants and products, including organic materials

in processes

Multiple reactions in multiple systemsMultiple reactions in multiple systems

Page 15: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

Refine assessments (current) Work on other progress variables Designing additional items Items revision based on the levels of scaffolding Quantitative analyses of item responses

Conduct teaching experiments to… Refine understanding of how students engage with and learn about

environmental science

Use research to… Inform development of curriculum materials Inform development of new standards for formal K-12 science education

2007 AERA Annual Meeting 15

Page 16: Learning Progressions in the Carbon Cycle

Environmental Literacy research groups▪ Michigan State University▪ Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network▪ University of California, Berkeley▪ University of Michigan▪ Northwestern University▪ AAAS Project 2061

Visit our websites at…▪ Environmental Literacy website

▪ http://edr1.educ.msu.edu/EnvironmentalLit/index.htm

▪ Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research (BEAR) Center▪ http://bearcenter.berkeley.edu

2007 AERA Annual Meeting 16