Organization Learning And Learning Organization Part 2 By Dr. Henry T. Yeh
Learning Organization Plan
-
Upload
pewitt-junior-high -
Category
Documents
-
view
236 -
download
3
Transcript of Learning Organization Plan
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 1
Plan for Learning Organization
at Pewitt Consolidated Independent School District
By Martha Rice
Texas A & M University at Texarkana
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 2
Introduction
Writers have argued about the finer points of learning organizations for decades, and yet
the learning organization has been slow to catch on, especially (and somewhat ironically) in
education itself. Learning organizations, which are democratic in nature and require that
participants continue to learn throughout their participation, could contribute to the growth of
quality education. Learning organizations require leaders who advocate risk-free environments
in which stakeholders share their ideas about organizational flaws and solutions. Stakeholders
are by necessity entrusted with the evolution of their organizations. Pewitt CISD, a small rural
district in Northeast Texas, could become a learning organization that could embody what an
education system in the information age should be, but to succeed in this endeavor, its leaders
would have to carefully plan and put into practice key elements of openness within the school
and the community itself.
What is a learning organization?
Definitions
Every researcher provides his or her own slant to what a learning organization is. Cotae
describes a learning organization as being an organization composed of individuals that learn, as
an organization that learns while it works, as employees who work and learn in a learning
climate, and as changes in an organization that lead to continual learning opportunities (2010).
Symon calls it a democracy, where stakeholders are free to share their knowledge for the benefit
of the organization itself (2002). Sushil says that it is LIFE: learning, innovation, flexibility, and
entrepreneurship, which should gradually evolve into a utopian LIFE of love, inspiration, fun,
and enlightenment when the learning organization is fully realized. Garvin, Edmondson, and
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 3
Gino, in clarifying Senge’s idyllic thesis of learning organization in “Is Yours a Learning
Organization?” suggest that it is an organization whose employees, armed with knowledge they
have learned themselves, contribute that knowledge to the overall progress and competitiveness
of the organization (Senge, 1990). Garvin et al. argue that while Senge’s basic definition is
sound, that building a learning organization is not simple, and requires concrete steps—absolute
definitions, assessment tools, and attention to detail (2008).
Characteristics
Learning organizations have leaders who have realized that their organization is
competing within a global economy in the information age rather than in a local economy in the
industrial age (Joseph & Reigeluth, 2010). To better serve its clients, the leadership has decided
to put aside autocracy and to expand decision making, problem-solving, and knowledge
accumulation to its stakeholders, from top to bottom, to create a shared vision of what the
organization can become, and to plan accordingly to enact appropriate change in the organization
(Chich-Jen, Wang & Fu-Jin 2009). The leadership, acting as guide and facilitator will provide
stakeholders a risk-free environment in which to continue to learn and add knowledge to the
organization (Senge, 1990). The organization will be open, reflective, and transparent in
operation (Garvin & Edmondson, 2008). It will also be more competitive, responsive to
problems, pleasing to clients, and successful (Vargas-Hernández & Noruzi, 2010).
Strategies for creating and building the learning organization
Research suggests that the best gains overall are to be achieved when an organization
truly becomes a learning organization in fact, not just in name. Leadership must be visionary in
a learning organization, and shared, not autocratic (Symon, 2002). Leaders should collaborate to
solve problems (Chich-Jen, Wang & Fu-Jin 2009), encourage collaborative problem solving
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 4
groups (Confessore & Kops, 1998), and empower employees and stakeholders to speak out
(Kurnia, 2009, Hind & Koenigsberger, 2007; Senge, 1990). In short, all stakeholders of the
organization (administrators, teachers, staff, students, parents, and other community members),
should collaborate, and administrators should create a risk-free environment for them to work on
solving the problems (Garvin & Edmondson, 2008). Not listening to employees tends to create
low workplace morale (Stripeikis & Žukauskas, 2005). All stakeholders have unique
perspectives into the problems and potential improvements of any organization, and all their
perspectives potentially have merit (Hee-Kyung, Yeong Mahn, and So Young 2006),
Based on collaboration with stakeholders, leaders should formulate
goals for their individual groups and come together to form an overarching
vision for the organization (Garvin & Edmondson, 2008). Leaders should
develop plans to make it easier for all stakeholders to take ownership in
implementing change (Sushil, 2007), and should provide resources to help
stakeholders succeed in the shared plans. It will be important to address mental
models stakeholders carry, because people do not like to change (Stripeikis & Žukauskas, 2005).
Organizations can change to meet shared visions (Sushil, 2007) however, and great leaders
should link future goals with the culture of the present (Stripeikis & Žukauskas, 2005). Building
support groups (Barker & Camarata, 1998) and creating mentorship programs will help plans
succeed (An & Reigeluth, 2005; Confessore & Kops, 1998) probably because mentorships help
strengthen group learning and adaptation within organizations and empower stakeholders who
belong to those groups (Buck, 2004).
A learning organization learns through the actions of its stakeholders. Leaders should
encourage employees of the organization to learn (Stripeikis & Žukauskas, 2005). Customized
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 5
training can address specific needs identified by stakeholders (An & Reigeluth, 2005), and
should include formal and informal training sessions (King, 2001). One of the benefits of being
a learning organization is that the organization becomes more competitive (Vargas-Hernández &
Noruzi, 2010; Garvin & Edmondson, 2008), and to that end, groups could have problem-solving
sessions to become stronger, more flexible thinkers (An & Reigeluth, 2005; Confessore & Kops,
1998; Senge, 1990). Leaders can encourage employees to use online learning modules and
indoctrinate new employees to the learning organization (Cordivari, 2010). Leaders can reward
employees for taking initiative in continuing their learning (Kurnia, 2009), although Garvin
argues that rewards for learning might not be effective (2008). It will be important to increase
overall communication in the organization, especially using technology (Davis & Davis, 2009),
and through interdisciplinary groups. Knowledge can then be systematically shared to build a
storehouse of knowledge (An & Reigeluth, 2005; King, 2001) that can be continually enhanced
and that will become a free, powerful resource of the organization, even when an employee
leaves (Stripeikis & Žukauskas, 2005).
As the learning organization continues to grow, mistakes will be made. Leaders should
continue to reassure stakeholders that they are working in a positive, risk-free environment
where mistakes are seen as learning opportunities (Garvin & Edmondson, 2008; Senge, 1990).
A learning environment should be in a continual cycle of reflection to assess what is working,
what is not working, why things are successful or unsuccessful, and what should be changed,
added, or ignored (Garvin & Edmondson, 2008; Hind & Koenigsberger, 2007; An & Reigeluth,
2005; Stripeikis & Žukauskas, 2005). The leaders of the organization should continue to listen
to feedback from all stakeholders (Stripeikis & Žukauskas, 2005).
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 6
Is Pewitt Consolidated Independent School District a learning organization?
Description of Pewitt Consolidated Independent School District (Pewitt CISD)
Pewitt CISD was founded in 1950 and, along with Daingerfield ISD, is one of the only
two school districts in Morris County. Pewitt CISD serves the Naples and Omaha, Texas,
communities. Pewitt is a preK-12 2-A school with a population somewhere just under 1,000
students; the number varies throughout the year. Pewitt CISD is made up of three schools: Paul
H. Pewitt High School (PHS), Pewitt Junior High School (PJHS), and Pewitt Elementary. Each
grade usually has about 70-90 students. On average, around 300 students attend PHS; 250
students attend PJHS; and 450 students attend Pewitt Elementary (Texas Education Agency,
2009).
The Pewitt system has been conservatively led by Superintendent Dr. David Fitts since
2003. Our new curriculum director / instructional technologist is Jackie Dammann. Pewitt
Elementary has been led by Principal Laurence Johnson for the past four years. Pewitt Junior
High School has been led by Principal Ronny Herron for about 14 years. Pewitt High School has
been led for the past two years by Holly Tucker. As a whole, the district faces two big problems:
a poor tax base in cities that virtually have no industry in one of the smallest and poorest counties
in Texas, and standardized testing. This year the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills
(TAKS) tests have become obsolete and uncertainty of what is coming next is stressful to both
administrators and teachers.
Assessment approaches
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 7
With their Learning Organization Survey, Garvin, Edmondson, and Gino (2008) created
an assessment to measure an organization’s characteristics as a learning organization. Pewitt
CISD was measured using this assessment. The survey measures topics organized into three
categories: Supporting Learning Environment to measure an organization’s psychological safety
for stakeholders, appreciation of stakeholder differences, openness to new ideas of stakeholders,
and time provided for stakeholder reflection; Concrete Learning Processes and Practices to
measure the ways the organization tolerates or appreciates individuals’ experimentation with and
collection of information, and that assesses how well the organization analyzes, educates, and
transfers knowledge that originate with its stakeholders; and Leadership that Reinforces Learning
to measure how well or how little the organization itself learns and expects its stakeholders to
learn. The second assessment measure was the 2009-2010 Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Accountability Ratings, which ranks schools as Exemplary, Recommended, Academically
Acceptable, and Academically Unacceptable based primarily on TAKS scores.
Assessment results
Pewitt CISD scored highest (but only in the 3rd quartile) in information collection and
analysis, and in providing time for stakeholder reflection, mainly due to the importance placed
on TAKS data and analysis, and because of state-mandated yearly reflections. Pewitt placed in
the 2nd quartile in education and training, and in information transfer, again, mainly due to TAKS
and state mandates. Teachers have to continue with professional development. To help improve
standardized test scores, administrators require teachers to organize vertical and horizontal
alignments and to follow a standardized curriculum called C-Scope.
Unfortunately, most of the categories fell into the bottom quartile for Pewitt CISD.
Highest of these lows were Leadership that reinforces learning and Learning process composite.
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 8
In the bottom quartile were Learning environment composite, Experimentation, Psychological
safety, and Appreciation of differences. Far below the bottom category was Openness to new
ideas. Pewitt CISD could improve in all areas of assessment.
TEA rated Pewitt CISD as Recognized, with Pewitt High School Recognized, Pewitt
Junior High School Academically Acceptable, and Pewitt Elementary Exemplary. To the district
administrators, this ranking would indicate that Pewitt Elementary is working perfectly, Pewitt
High School needs to improve somewhat, and Pewitt Junior High School has academic problems
to overcome.
Action plans for Pewitt CISD
The Pewitt CISD administrators seek excellence; they are all dedicated, but performance
on standardized testing is their number one goal. True change at Pewitt CISD will come from
administrators in collaboration with key teachers, staff members, students, and community
members who believe that changes should be effected for the good of the students. These
discussions among natural school leaders would start small, but would grow into diverse
discussion groups. Power in any organization is not necessarily with the leaders, but can be
found in powerful like-minded groups that tend to discuss organizational problems informally.
As this process goes on, more stakeholders should be buying into the change toward Pewitt
CISD becoming a unified learning organization. Leaders will need to assure all stakeholders that
the process of discussion and planning is positive and risk-free, and that they will be free to
identify problems and discuss solutions within their groups. Group leaders will come back
together to discuss problems and create goals and a vision of change for the school.
When leaders share the vision with the school, they should make sure that all
stakeholders know the shared vision and the plans that have been made to achieve the vision. It
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 9
is important that as many stakeholders as possible believe in the vision and decide to work on the
plan for success. This is where the learning organization of Pewitt CISD might meet its first big
obstacle. Teachers are complacent at Pewitt CISD for the most part. They will generally
informally gripe about everything, but are good soldiers in deed. If the principal tells them to
attend a workshop, they will attend. If the principal tells them to use what they learned in the
workshop, they will try to use the information. However, if they have to overreach or fight the
status quo on their own, they tend not to, basically for two reasons: because standardized testing
is priority one at Pewitt CISD, and teachers feel that they will be in the most trouble if they do
not prepare their students to succeed on the TAKS, and because the leadership at Pewitt CISD
has never tolerated mavericks very well; therefore, most teachers stay quiet in order to keep their
job without calling attention to themselves. Therefore, if a learning organization is ever to be a
reality at Pewitt CISD, the leaders will have to make it clear that they expect teachers to
participate as learning organization members: to speak out for change when necessary, and to
continue to learn and disseminate their knowledge.
Pewitt CISD leaders would need to encourage teachers to continue to learn. Most Pewitt
CISD teachers attend workshops at Region 8 Service Center in Mt. Pleasant, Texas. Leaders
should empower teachers to attend professional conventions and to participate in online and
distance learning. Leaders should also arrange for informal, short trainings for teachers to attend
at school. Leaders should also recognize and reward teachers who continue to learn. When
teachers attend professional development, leaders should make time for them to share what they
learned with other teachers. Pewitt CISD administrators and teachers should create shared
databases as employees learn new knowledge in order to record that knowledge that would
otherwise be lost when employees leave. Teachers would participate in interdisciplinary
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 10
collaborative groups to communicate risk-free using discussion boards. Teachers’ continual
discussion and feedback on the discussion boards will be valuable for leaders as they evaluate
changes in the organization. What works will be continued, what fails will be analyzed to find
out why it failed and what can be changed so that the learning organization can be successful in
future. A learning organization never stops reflecting and changing.
Conclusion
As Joseph and Reigeluth (2010) suggest, in the information age, it is illogical to continue
to run schools as they were designed centuries ago to produce industrial line workers. Although
Pewitt CISD is dedicated to preparing its students for their futures and has taken steps toward
excellence over the years, without true systemic change, there can be no real progress. Pewitt is
like most schools. Teachers systematically deliver knowledge linearly, hoping to reach the
majority of students with most of the curriculum material. Teachers measure student success
with test scores; administrators measure student (and teacher) success with standardized test
scores. When a student doesn’t perform highly in this system, the current educational
environment disenfranchises them. There is little, if any, student input on what is taught or how
it is taught. Technology, which students are comfortable with, is underused for education. The
learning organization is an ideal way to structure educational systems, because many of the most
promising educational methods for preparing students for the future fit easily into the learning
organization model. Education in the information age should be flexible and nonlinear, designed
by students using technology to solve problems and carry out inquiry that is meaningful to them.
Student growth should be measured according to knowledge gained and demonstrated through
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 11
authentic real-world products. Interestingly, however, schools, like Pewitt CISD, may be the last
organizations to become learning organizations.
References
An, Y.J., & Reigeluth, C.M. (2005). A Study of Organizational Learning at Smalltown Hospital.
Performance Improvement, 44(10), 34-9.
Barker, R., & Camarata, M. (1998). The Role of Communication in Creating and Maintaining a
Learning Organization: Preconditions, Indicators, and Disciplines. Journal of Business
Communication, 35(4), 443-467. Retrieved from Business Source Complete database.
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=1304308&site=ehost-
live
Buck, M. (2004). Mentoring: A Promising Strategy for Creating and Sustaining a Learning
Organization. Adult Learning, 15(3/4), 8-11. Retrieved from Vocational and Career
Collection database. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=voh&AN=29363626&site=ehost-lives
Chich-Jen, S., Wang, I., & Fu-Jin, W. (2009). The Relationships among Cross-Cultural
Management, Learning Organization, and Organizational Performance in Multinationals.
Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 37(1), 15-30. Retrieved from
Academic Search Complete database. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=a9h&AN=44517079&site=ehost-live
Chinowsky, P., Molenaar, K., & Realph, A. (2007). Learning Organizations in Construction.
Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(1), 27-34. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-
597X(2007)23:1(27). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=syh&AN=23461277&site=ehost-live
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 12
Confessore, S., & Kops, W. (1998). Self-Directed Learning and the Learning Organization:
Examining the Connection Between the Individual and the Learning Environment.
Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9(4), 365-375. Retrieved from Business
Source Complete database. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=bth&AN=11495314&site=ehost-live
Cordivari, R. (2010). From Training Company to Learning Organization. T+D, 64(1), 60.
Retrieved from MasterFILE Premier database. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=f5h&AN=47357255&site=ehost-live
Cotae, F. (2010). Looking at the Link between Leadership, Organizational Learning and the
Internationalization Sigmoid. Global Management Journal, 2(1), 5-18. Retrieved from
Business Source Complete database. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=bth&AN=51300689&site=ehost-live
Davis, J., & Davis, H. (2009). The Learning Organization Implemented in Education through
Advisory Committees. Education, 130(1), 114. Retrieved from MasterFILE Premier
database. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=f5h&AN=44016925&site=ehost-live
Garvin, D.A., & Edmondson, A.C. (2008, December 15). The Importance of Learning in
Organizations. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUP4WcfNyAA
Garvin, D.A., Edmondson, A.C., & Gino, F. (2008). Learning Organization Survey. Retrieved
from https://surveys.hbs.edu/perseus/se.ashx?s=381B5FE533C282FF
Garvin, D.A., Edmondson, A.C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is Yours a Learning Organization? Harvard
Business Review, 109-116.
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 13
Hind, M., & Koenigsberger, J. (2007). Culture and Commitment: the Key to the Creation of an
Action Learning Organization. Action Learning: Research & Practice, 4(1), 87-94.
doi:10.1080/14767330701233939. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=bth&AN=25085232&site=ehost-live
Joseph, R., & Reigeluth, C. (2010). The Systemic Change Process in Education: A Conceptual
Framework. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(2), 97-117. Retrieved from
Education Research Complete database. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=ehh&AN=50458498&site=ehost-live
King, W. (2001). Strategies for Creating a Learning Organization. Information Systems
Management, 18(1), 12. Retrieved from Computer Source database.
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cph&AN=3849854&site=ehost-
live
Kurnia, S. (2009). Enhancing Motivation in a Learning Organization: Using Balanced Scorecard.
International Journal of Learning, 16(4), 47-66. Retrieved from Education Research
Complete database. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=ehh&AN=43798744&site=ehost-live
Northouse, Peter. (2008). Fundamentals of Leadership. Sage Publications.
Pewitt CISD homepage. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.pewittcisd.net
Senge, P.M. (1990). The Leader's New Work: Building Learning Organizations. Sloan
Management Review, 32(1), 7-22.
Stripeikis, O., & Žukauskas, P. (2005). Change Management -- A Key Factor of the Learning
Organization in Knowledge-based Economy. Knowledge-Based Economy: Management
of Creation & Development, 323-337. Retrieved from Business Source Complete
PLAN FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION AT PEWITT CISD 14
database. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=bth&AN=22603648&site=ehost-live
Sushil. (2007). From Learning Organization to Enlightened Organization. Global Journal of
Flexible Systems Management, 8(4), 2. Retrieved from Business Source Complete
database. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=bth&AN=36126801&site=ehost-live
Symon, G. (2002). The 'Reality' of Rhetoric and the Learning organization in the UK. Human
Resource Development International, 5(2), 155-174. doi:10.1080/13678860010025409.
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=6895107&site=ehost-
live
Texas Education Agency (2009). Academic excellence indicator system. Retrieved from
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/index.html
Vargas-Hernández, J., & Noruzi, M. (2010). How Intellectual Capital and Learning Organization
Can Foster Organizational Competitiveness?. International Journal of Business &
Management, 5(4), 183-193. Retrieved from Business Source Complete database.
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=49173906&site=ehost-
live