Leah Douglas 1,3, Michael Bright 1, Doug Aaron 1, Alexander B. Papandrew 1, and Thomas A....
-
Upload
quinten-bonser -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Leah Douglas 1,3, Michael Bright 1, Doug Aaron 1, Alexander B. Papandrew 1, and Thomas A....
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2:1,5layer,ncp
Current(mA/cm²)
IR
-Fre
eP
ote
nti
al(
V)
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Untreated carbon paper5% PTFENo Carbon Paper
Current (mA/cm²)
IR-F
ree P
ote
nti
al (V
)
Reduction of redox flow battery overpotential via electrode modifications
Leah Douglas1,3, Michael Bright1, Doug Aaron1, Alexander B. Papandrew1, and Thomas A. Zawodzinski, Jr.1,2 1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
2Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN³The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
OBJECTIVEFlow batteries are a potential technology for energy storage because they allow for large amounts of energy to be stored and flexibility in size. Energy and power capacity can be independently scaled. One type of flow battery is the vanadium redox battery (VRB). An advantage of the VRB is that crossover only results in loss of charge, not cross contamination and all charge is stored in the electrolyte.
MOTIVATION The objective of this experiment was to increase electrode surface area and reduce the contact resistance between the membrane and the electrode. This was done by attaching a microporous electrode directly to the membrane. Variations of carbon inks, amounts of ink and types of carbon paper were considered in this effort.
• Electrolyte: 2M vanadium in 5M SO⁴⁻
• Flow rate: 20mL/min• Potentiostat: Biologic HCP-803
up to 80 amps• Membrane: N117 for thickness• Carbon paper electrodes (SGL
group)
Setup
Polarization curves allow for the determination of the dominant loss mechanisms in a battery. Activation loss is the result of slow reaction kinetics at low current. Ohmic loss is attributed to charge transport in the battery. Mass transport limitation is the inability to
increase rate of electrolyte delivery to match increase in current.
Electrode Mass 6.8 mg (5 layer), 17.4 mg (10 layer)
Carbon:Ionomer 2:1 C:I, 50:1 C:I
Carbon Paper 5% treated, untreated, none
Electrode Configuration
Current flowing in electrochemical cells experiences intrinsic resistance (iR). To correct for this resistance, the high frequency resistance (HFR) is
found Finding the areal specific resistance (ASR) allows for the calculation of an iR-free polarization curve. This is done by taking the
HFR and multiplying it with the area of the membrane.
Different compositions of carbon and ionomer ink were considered. The goal here was to increase electrode surface area and improve the electrical
conductivity of the electrode.
Different layers of ink were tested to see if, by adding more ink, performance would improve. Increased electrode surface area could result in better
performance. However, the thicker electrode did not exhibit better performance.
Different types of carbon paper were tested to determine the effect on the battery. There was no discernable difference between the different carbon
papers .
Electrode:5 layers, 50:1 C:I
ink
Electrode: 10 layers, 2:1 C:I
ink
Summary • Increased carbon content in the electrode
resulted in improved performance.
• No great performance improvement was observed when doubling the number of layers of ink used to make the electrodes.
• Wet-proofed carbon paper performed similarly to non-wet-proofed carbon paper.
• Lack of carbon paper resulted in noticeably greater activation loss.
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.6
correctraw
Cell P
ote
nti
al (V
)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8
50:1 C:I2:1 C:I
Current (mA/cm²)
Pote
nti
al (V
)
Gold Current Collector
Graphite PlateMembrane
Cathode
Anode
• 10 layer decal• 2:1 C:I composition• N117 membrane
• 2:1 C:I composition• N117 membrane• No carbon paper
present
Acknowledments to NSF grant #1004083 for making this research possible.