Leading the way; making a difference AIR EMISSIONS LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires 5th November...
-
Upload
lewis-wade -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Leading the way; making a difference AIR EMISSIONS LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires 5th November...
Leading the way; making a difference
AIR EMISSIONS
LATIN AMERICAN PANEL
Buenos Aires5th November 2014
Dragos Rauta INTERTANKO
Leading the way; making a difference
• Globally(emissions from fuel with max. x% sulphur content) – Currently – 3.50%– After Jan 1, 2020 (or 2025) – 0.50%
• ECA (Baltic Sea, North Sea, NA & Caribbean)– Currently – 1.00%– After Jan 1, 2015 – 0.10%
• European Union Sulphur DirectiveFollows IMO except:– Currently – 0.10% “at berth”– After Jan 1, 2020 – 0.50% in EU waters (?)
• California - 0.10% (24 miles)
SOx Emissions Limits
Leading the way; making a difference
• LS MGO expected to be available
• Possible local shortage during initial phase-in period
• Expected hikes on price in earlier stages
• Premium expected to keep constant at $250 - $350 / ton
• New fuel/blends/hybrids (i.e. HDME 50)
ECAs – LSFO Availability (0.1%)
Leading the way; making a difference
Safety aspects• combustion characteristics• heat transfer and circulation• flash point temp. (would 60ºC be lowered?)
Operational aspects• fuel segregation/contamination• incompatibility - fuel filter blockages• low viscosity – leaks & loss in pressure• low lubricity - pump seizure• bio element (FAME)
ECAs – Fuel Change Over Challenges
Leading the way; making a difference
• Specifications not yet included in ISO 8217• Compatibility with HFO, MGO (and with each-other)• Requires heated tanks• High paraffin content – cold flow properties
• Fuel Stability & quality– Sediment formation– Injector and filter problems
• Separate tanks for new fuels?• Engine warranty issues?• Available amounts limited – would price be competitive?
ECAs – New Fuels/Blends/Hybrid - Potential Issues
Leading the way; making a difference
• API Technical Considerations for Fuel Switching
• CIMAC Guideline for Operation of Marine Engines on Low Sulphur Diesel
HAZID to avoid mechanical failure & power lossINTERTANKO/OCIMF Recommendations on Fuel Change Over Procedures
Leading the way; making a difference
• Ship owners & operators should:– ensure that all relevant equipment on board is
capable of handling ECA fuel– any modifications necessary are put in place and
tested well before the deadline– review contracts with fuel suppliers to ensure an
adequate supply of ECA fuel
• A vessel must use compliant fuel in ECA
• If a ship owner is not able to obtain compliant fuel due to non-availability, a FONAR must be submitted
USCG Advices for January 1, 2015
USCG/EPA Policies for ECAs
Leading the way; making a difference
• If a ship owner is not able to obtain compliant fuel due to non-availability, a FONAR must be submitted
• FONAR is not a waiver, it is a statement of non-compliance– The lowest possible sulphur content fuel should be
used
• If Bunker Delivery Note (BDN) and independent test differ, Note of Protest (NOP) should be submitted
INTERTANKO advice: issue NOP if MARPOL Sample not taken in accordance with the IMO Guidelines
Fuel Oil Non-Availability Report (FONAR)
Leading the way; making a difference
During USCG PSC examination, the ship should provide: – record of actions taken to attempt to achieve compliance – evidence the vessel attempted to purchase compliant fuel
oil in accordance with its voyage plan, and if not available where planned, that attempts were made to locate an alternative source
– documentation that Flag Administration and EPA were notified
– USCG will refer deficiencies identified during PSC of ECA non-compliance to EPA for enforcement
EPA reviews data/assess trends on FONAR submissions
Four companies that have submitted a number of FONARs have been issued subpoenas by EPA
Fuel Oil Non-Availability Report
Leading the way; making a difference
FONAR: where vessels are coming from
Leading the way; making a difference
FONAR: where vessels are coming from
Japan 47%
China 35%
South Korea 10%
Taiwan 1% India 0%
Australia 1% Brunei 1%Indonesia 1%NZ 1% Singapore 1%Samoa 1%Fiji 0%
Unknown 0%
Asia/Australia/Pacific Islands
32%
24%
14%
7%
5%
5%4%
4%
3% 1%
South America
Venezuela
Brazil
Colombia
Ecuador
Curacao
Trinidad
Aruba
Peru
Chile
Guyana
36%
29%
13%
19%
3%
North America
US East CoastCanadian East CoastUS West Coast Gulf Coast Canadian West Coast
Leading the way; making a difference
FONAR: where vessels are going to
Leading the way; making a difference
FONAR: Reporting
Leading the way; making a difference
New Guidelines on PSC: At initial inspection within an ECA or first port after transiting an ECA the PSCO will look at:• Bunker Delivery Note (BDN)• MARPOL sample• Evidence of written change over procedures• Record of fuel oil changeover
If fuel not available must present a record of actions, including:• Voyage plan and when notice of ECA transit received• Date and time of expected transit• Description of actions taken to obtain fuel • Availability of compliant fuel at first POC in ECA & plans to obtain
fuel• Ship need not deviate from intended voyage or unduly delay the
voyage
Party will take into account relevant circumstances and evidence to determine the appropriate action, including not taking control measures
ECA 2015 – Paris MOU
Leading the way; making a difference
EU – EU Sulphur Directive - European Sustainability Shipping Forum (ESSF) with 6 technical groups on:
a) LNG as Marine Fuel
b) Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems
c) Implementation of Sulphur Directive – PSC & “sniffers”
d) Financing Opportunities
e) Research & Innovation
f) Competitiveness
ECA 2015 – EU Enforcement Policies
Leading the way; making a difference
Group c) Implementation of Sulphur Directive – PSC & “sniffers”– Harmonised sampling – Developing On-board Sampling Guidelines– Designated Sampling Point (or two)– Sampling tolerances?– Expected completion by the end of 2014
INTERTANKO stressing the importance of control over fuel being delivered to the ship.EU Sulphur Directive Article 4b.3"Member States shall ensure that gas oils are not placed on the
market in their territory if the sulphur content of these marine gas oils exceeds 0.10%" by mass”.
ECA 2015 – Europe (ESSF)
Leading the way; making a difference
• Fuel Standards• Bunkering Standards• Bunker Delivery Note
– Quality Control• HAZIDS at design stage• Design for practical application• Design for safety and efficiency
Alternative Fuels – lessons to learn