Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

37

description

 

Transcript of Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

Page 1: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales
Page 2: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

Strategic Plan

2010-2012

Page 3: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

3

date

/ re

fere

nces

Strategic Review

Strategic review of Group activities undertaken withinthe SBP2 framework

Presentation to Board on 10/12/09

Global Group strategy confirmed for the major markets:

� Aerospace� Space� Defence� Security

Page 4: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

4

date

/ re

fere

nces

Aerospace

Major difficulties on several programmesCorrective measures to redress the situation

First effects of the Civil Aerospace Crisis on salesEnd of recession expected in 2012

Euro/dollar exchange rateThreat to competitiveness to the horizon of 2012/2013

Pursue the preparation of future in ATMSESAR, NEXTGEN

Strategic partnerships in regions of growthBrazil, Russia, India, China

Page 5: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

5

date

/ re

fere

nces

Space

Enhance the competitiveness in telecoms(dollar market) and on ESA market

Optimisation of internal cost base

Strengthen business in Italy and in GermanyItaly : Sicral 2, SigmabusGermany : DLR partnership

Strengthen the Space AllianceComplementarity of systems / services

Pursue strategic partnerships outside EuropeSale of payloads in Russia, in USA

Page 6: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

6

date

/ re

fere

nces

Defence

Major difficulties on several contractsCorrective action to put situation right

Beneficial effects of French stimulus planMust be followed by export orders

Rapid technological evolution in tactical radio and optronic markets

Opportunity / threat to worldwide market shares

Capture market share in the naval domain in USAand in Germany

JVs or strategic partnerships

Promote renewal of radar familyFrom very short to very long range

Page 7: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

7

date

/ re

fere

nces

Turn around contracts in difficultyStrong action needed

Develop position in rail signallingPartnerships in growth regions (Brazil, Russia, India, China)

Propose innovative solutions for Civil SecurityR&D investment in supervision and video analysis

Strong growth in securing IT systemsExpansion of the range of products and services

Strengthen local integration centresBroadening of their business domains

Security

Page 8: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

8

date

/ re

fere

nces

Remember: our strategy is global

Hardware

Software

Processing

Systems

Space

Avionics

ATM

Radars

Radiocommunications

Defence networks

Defence systems

Security systems

Signalling systems

Optronics

Sonars

States

Public Operators

Large Accounts

Aircraft Cies

KeyTechnical Domains

Key CustomersWorldwide

KeyKnow-How Domains

Page 9: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

PROBASIS

Performance plan

2010-1014

* "momentum" in ancient Greek

Page 10: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

10

date

/ re

fere

nces

Improve margin to fuel initial and external growth worldwide

Anticipate market price decreases and US dollar pressure

Enhance working methods within the Group by systematically matching best practices

Global target

A five-year action plan for a stronger Thales

Target a € 1.3 bn impact in 2014

Page 11: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

11

date

/ re

fere

nces

Reduce the cost of non qualityfocus operational units attention on strengthening programme management and increasing engineering capability bring all units to Thales « best in class » levels

Adapt to market price decreases and US dollar pressure through the supply chain

Stronger « make or buy », « design-to-cost » policies Further reduction of number of suppliers, rationalisation of production plants

Reduce internal costsshared services, support functions, general expenses,real estate

Major areas for performance improvement

Page 12: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

12

date

/ re

fere

nces

PROBASIS team headed by the CEO, assisted by the SVP Operational Transformation

Team work involving the Operational Managers to define the action plans

Follow up of action plans through monthly reporting

The « principle of subsidiarity» will be systematically taken into account in the day-to-day execution of the action plans

Methodology

Page 13: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

Chorus II

2010-2011

Page 14: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

14

date

/ re

fere

nces

FactsMajor gaps revealed on ProgrammesMain root causes

Upstream technical choicesContract management Processes are neither simple nor precise enough; their implementation is not rigorous enoughDiluted responsibilities

ConsequencesReinforce the Design Authority Involve Purchasing, Legal and the Design Authority from the upstream phase onwardsDevelop process implementation measurement and introduce a Right to Veto for the Quality Department at key gates

Chorus II

Tailor the Chorus Reference Systemto support Thales Transformation

Page 15: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

15

date

/ re

fere

nces

Chorus II Orientation

Simplify and unify the Chorus Reference System(structure, content)

Define the Chorus Reference System in two layersSteering: those elements that are strictly for managing processesOperational: those operational elements associated with daily business operations, including IS solutions

Define convergence route at Group level while taking into account local business needs

Clarify Thales operating processes and individual roles and responsibilities within these processes

Page 16: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

16

date

/ re

fere

nces � Chorus II KickChorus II KickChorus II KickChorus II Kick----off Reviewoff Reviewoff Reviewoff Review

� Project team and Group Project team and Group Project team and Group Project team and Group

Process OwnersProcess OwnersProcess OwnersProcess Owners

� 26262626thththth January 2010January 2010January 2010January 2010

Planning

Initialisation

Target

vision

Target

architecture

Deploym

ent principles

Realisation

Implem

entation and D

eployment

T0 = 19/10/2009

2 months 2 months 6 months 12 months

2009 2010 2011

Page 17: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

New GroupNew GroupNew GroupNew Group

OrganisationOrganisationOrganisationOrganisation

ProjectProjectProjectProject

Page 18: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

18

date

/ re

fere

nces

Bring organisation closer to the customer

De-centralise to be more efficient

Simplify procedures to be more competitive

Favour international Growth

Objectives of change

Page 19: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

19

date

/ re

fere

nces Countries act as simple « host » structures for the DivisionsNo global approach nor P&L responsibility at Country level, therefore local resources not optimisedNo real « business » motivation for the Country Directors, therefore insufficient regional growth

Previous matrix

Division 1

GBL 1 (Global Business Line)

CTU 4

CBL 2

CBL 5

GBL 2 (Global Business Line)

GTU 2(Global Technical Unit)

CENTRES OF EXCELLENCE, SHARED

SERVICES, AND FUNCTIONS

GBS 1 (Global Business

Segment)GBS 2 GTU 1

Country 1CBL 1

(Country Business Line)

CBL 4

CTU 1 (Country

Technical Unit)LE 1 (Legal Entity)

CBS 1 (Country Business Segment)

CBS 2

CTU 2 CTU 5

Country 2

LE 2 CBS 3 CBS 4

CBL 3

CBL 6

CTU 3 CTU 6LE 3 CBS 5 CBS 6

Page 20: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

20

date

/ re

fere

nces

Concept inherited from the Thomson-CSF era, when France dominated largely, with a business model based on direct exports to the rest of the world � out of step with current size of Group’s presence abroad (>50% of employees)

Overcentralisation of powers by the Divisions, so that :Responsibility removed from local teamsImpossibility of Division’s staff to keep pace with everythingGreat difficulty in establishing local inter Divisional synergies (« silo » effect)Inadequate response to contracts difficulties, loss of commercial opportunities, failure to optimise local costs

Matrix too complex, each Division having its own reference system and imposing it in each country (proliferation of reporting lines and systems, regional JVs uncoordinated)

Significant waste of internal effort, lack of coherence within the Group

Too many interfaces with client Thales’ image misunderstood by client, scale of Group insufficiently exploited

Disadvantages of current organisation

Page 21: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

21

date

/ re

fere

nces

Example of current complexity of reporting lines

CEO Thalesgroup

HQ

ThalesgroupArea A Area B&C

1

2 3 4 51

2

3

4

5

Finance Reporting

HR Reporting

Operation Reporting

Technical Reporting

Sales&Marketing Reporting

DIV

L&J

DIV

NAV

DIV

AERO

DIV

SPACE

DIV

D3S

DIV

Air Systems

SBL

T&S

SBL

Security

SBL

CS

2 3 4 51 2 3 4 51

2 3 4 51 2 3 4 51

2 3 4 51 2 3 4 51 2 3 4 51

CCD

Thales Germany

HQ

Thales Germany

2 3 4 51

BA

AS

BA

Trans

BA

C&S

TDD-GmbH

2 3 4 51

Thales Koblenz

2 31

BA

Defence

2 3 4 51

BU

T&S

4 5

BU

Security

5

BU

AS/CS

5

VP

M&S

KAM

Defence

KAM

Security

KAM

Transport

KAM

Industry

Thales GroupThales Germany

Page 22: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

22

date

/ re

fere

nces

Evolution of the matrix:Domestic Countries become responsible for bids, contracts, customer satisfaction and for P&L (= short term)Divisions to focus on R&D strategy, products & services, industrial policies (= long term)

Evolution of Divisions: transition from six to seven, with the improvement of real coherence within each DivisionReduction in the number of Business Lines:move from 44 to 33Removal of management of Business SegmentsRemoval of Country Division Director, Global Technical Unit, Country Technical Unit conceptsUnification and simplification of economic and financial reporting, via the Domestic Countries

Envisaged way forward

Page 23: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

23

date

/ re

fere

nces

Country Directors are motivated by the global objectives of the Group in the Country, including successful implementation of contracts, customer satisfaction, profitability and working capital requirement.Countries are responsible for optimising local resources (Integration centres, support functions)Divisions are to focus on worldwide strategies (R&D, products & services, industrial policies)

Project for new matrix

« Shared services »

Management Domestic Country

Division 2Division 2BL 1

BL 2

Division 1Division 1

Business R & D Industry

BL 1

BL 2

Page 24: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

24

date

/ re

fere

nces

Two types of role coexist in the projectfor the new matrix:

Country axis: operational role, to include P&L, with a wide range of managerial responsibility (bids, programmes, customer relationship management, Human Resources and asset management, cost and WCR optimisation)

example: Area DirectorDomestic Country DirectorCompany Chairman & Chief Executive

Divisional axis: functional role, to include responsibility for strategy, with specific powers on operational managers (definition of R&D policy, product policy & services, and industrial policy) and associated methods of control (approval of R&D budget, of industrial and technical investment, and of technical content of bids)

example: Division DirectorBL Director

New responsibilites

Page 25: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

25

date

/ re

fere

ncesProject for New Country Organisation

� Area A � Area B

UK

Australia

USA

Canada

Netherlands

Norway

Germany

Italy

Spain

Singapore

Saudi Arabia

India

South Korea

North andCentralEurope Region

North andCentral Asia Region

Southern EuropeRegion (inc. EEC)

South Asia Region

Middle East Region

Central AmericaRegion

Africa Region

Domestic Countries

Commercial Network

Domestic Countries

Commercial Network

NATO

UN

Austria

Switzerland

� France, specific Domestic Country

Page 26: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

26

date

/ re

fere

nces

Four dual Divisions (Defence and Civil)

Defence & Security C4I Systems (3.1 B€): Network & Infrastructure Systems, Radio Communication Products, Information Technology Security, Protection Systems, Critical Information Systems

Project for new organisation of Divisions (1)

DSC

Air Operations (1.2 B€): Defence Air Operations, ATM & Navaids Systems, Surface Radars

DAO

DAV

Space (1.5 B€): Thales Alenia Space organisation unchanged(JV with Finmeccanica)

DSP

Avionics (2.4 B€) : Commercial Aircraft Solutions, In Flight Entertainment, Military Avionics, Helicopter Avionics,Electrical Systems, Training & Simulation, TWT & Imaging Subsystems

Page 27: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

27

date

/ re

fere

nces

Two Divisions 100% Defence:

Defence Mission Systems (2.2 B€): Electronic Combat Systems, Mission Airborne Solutions, Above Water Systems,Under Water Systems

Project for new organisation of Divisions (2)

DMS

DLD

DTS

Land Defence (1.5 B€) : Missile Systems, Optronics,Protected Vehicles, Armament & Ammunition

One Division 100% Civil:

Transportation Systems (1.3 B€) : Main Line Signalling,Urban Rail Signalling, Integrated Supervision Systems,Revenue Collection Systems

Page 28: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

28

date

/ re

fere

nces

KAM KAMKAM KAM KAM KAM

New commercial organisation of Domestic Countries

Large Clients ("Key Accounts")Large Clients ("Key Accounts")

KAM = Key Account Manager

CountryCorporate

LocalCompanies

Key Account ExecutiveKey Account Executive

The Key Account Executive is the Country Director or a close collaborator

Page 29: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

29

date

/ re

fere

nces

New organisation project explained to Unions:

10 December: Thales SA CCE15 December: Thales European Committee21 December: Major French Thales companies

Consultation of Unions about the project:January 2010

Implementation after consultation of Unions

Timetable

Page 30: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

Project of Project of Project of Project of

New ExecutiveNew ExecutiveNew ExecutiveNew Executive

CommitteeCommitteeCommitteeCommittee

Page 31: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

31

date

/ re

fere

nces

Project of New Executive Committee

Reynald SeznecSenior Vice President,

Space

Pascale SourisseSenior Vice President,

Defence & SecurityC4I Systems

Alex CresswellSenior Vice President,

Land Defence

Pierre-Eric PommelletSenior Vice President,

Defence Mission Systems

Jean-Loup PicardSenior Vice President,

Strategy

Blaise JaegerSenior Vice President, Area B

Patrice DurandSenior Vice President,

Finance & Administration

Jean-Loïc GalleSenior Vice President,

Air Operations

Luc VigneronChairman & CEO

Marko ErmanSenior Vice President,

Research &Technology

Yves BarouSenior Vice President,

Human Resources

Patrick FourniéSenior Vice President,

Operational Transformation

Michel MathieuSenior Vice President,

Avionics

Jean-Pierre ForestierSenior Vice President,

Transportation Systems

Alex DorrianExecutive Vice President, Area A,

CEO of Thales UK

Page 32: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

Project of Project of Project of Project of

new Areanew Areanew Areanew Area

organisationorganisationorganisationorganisation

Page 33: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

33

date

/ re

fere

nces

Project of New Area Organisation

Area A Area B

Domestic Operations B

UK

US

Canada

Netherlands

Australia & NZ

Norway

South Korea

Northern &Central Asia

Northern &Central Europe

Nato/UN

Austria

Saoudi Arabia

Spain

Italy

Europe inc EU Germany

India

Singapore

SwitzerlandAfrica

Latin America

Middle East

South & SouthEast Asia

Int’ lCo-ord A

HR

LEGAL

FINANCE

Sales & Marketing

Business Development

Page 34: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

34

date

/ re

fere

nces

Alex Dorrian Blaise Jaeger

G Delevacque

A Dorrian

A Cameron

TBD

A Blokhuis

C Jenkins

G Pedersen

I Kim

O Guibert

I AzemardE Buckley

M Veider

JY Tolot

A Parrondo

P Salvato

P Mathieu M Hellenthal

F Dupont

L Mayer

B GigerC Costes

C Kuberek

O Badard

M.L. Bourgeois

S. Lucot

TBD (1)

TBD (1)

TBD (1)

R Eskinazi

O Conrozier

Project of New Area Teams

Page 35: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

Project ofProject ofProject ofProject of

French Key French Key French Key French Key

AccountsAccountsAccountsAccounts

ManagementManagementManagementManagement

Page 36: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales

36

date

/ re

fere

nces

Project of French Key Accounts Management

R. Seznec P.E. Pommellet M. Mathieu J.L. Galle M. Erman J.P. Forestier B. JaegerP. Sourisse

DGACEADS/AIRBUS

EADS/EUROCOPTER

EADS/ASTRIUMCNESESA

DCMATDGA/DADGA/DO

DGA/UM ESIODGA/UM HORUS

DGA/UM NBCDGA/UM TER

DIRISIEADS SDE

EMATEMA

GENDARMERIELA POSTEMEDDATMINIMMMINDEFMINEFIMININT

NEXTEROTAN (France)

SGDNTOTAL

DASSAULTDCNS

DGA/UM AERODGA/UM COELDGA/UM HELIDGA/UM MIDDGA/UM NAVDGA/UM RAF

EMAAEMM

SIMMADSSF

MBDA

CEADGA/DSDGA/DTMIN E&R

SE Pro/Eco Num

RATPSE Transport

SNCF

COFACEDGA/DDIMIN AEE

SE AFF EUROSE COM EXT

Page 37: Le plan stratégique de Luc Vigneron pour Thales