Lauwereins - 3D - MPSoC Lauwereins.pdf · Rudy Lauwereins©imec 2008 5 3D TSV Technology Roadmap...

9
Will 3D stacking of ICs enable to continue Moore’s momentum in the 21 st century? Rudy Lauwereins Vice-President Nomadic Embedded Systems Professor Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 2 Maintaining Moore’s momentum • increase functionality with number of additional layers 3D Integration – Many System Opportunities Memory Processor RF Chip DNA Chip MEMS Battery Image Sensor Memory Memory Processor Processor RF Chip RF Chip DNA Chip MEMS MEMS Battery Battery Image Sensor Heterogeneous integration • build an integrated system with dedicated logic, SRAM, DRAM, FLASH, RF technologies • add new sensors, batteries, etc. 3D resolves the interconnect performance limitations • the on-chip interconnect length and related repeater cost More modular & scalable design • add new standardized components, replace existing ones with better performing ones Sleek form factor • 1mm^3 corresponds to >100Mbit SRAM cells Courtesy: Samsung

Transcript of Lauwereins - 3D - MPSoC Lauwereins.pdf · Rudy Lauwereins©imec 2008 5 3D TSV Technology Roadmap...

Will 3D stacking of ICs enable to continue Moore’s momentum in the 21st century?

Rudy Lauwereins

Vice-President Nomadic Embedded SystemsProfessor Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 2

Maintaining Moore’s momentum• increase functionality with number of additional layers

3D Integration – Many System Opportunities

Memory

Processor

RF Chip

DNA Chip

MEMS

Battery

Image Sensor

MemoryMemory

ProcessorProcessor

RF ChipRF Chip

DNA Chip

MEMSMEMS

BatteryBattery

Image Sensor

Heterogeneous integration• build an integrated system with dedicated logic, SRAM, DRAM,

FLASH, RF technologies• add new sensors, batteries, etc.

3D resolves the interconnect performance limitations• the on-chip interconnect length and related repeater cost

More modular & scalable design• add new standardized components, replace existing ones with

better performing ones

Sleek form factor• 1mm^3 corresponds to >100Mbit SRAM cells

Courtesy: Samsung

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 3

PathFinding @ The Core of introducing 3D

Design Rules & Models

TechnologyAssessment

IP Exploration(e.g. 3D NoC)

IP Models

GDSII

Technology Research

Process Modules

System Design

RTL toGDSII

Manufacturing& Test

Architecture

Inputs: Design optionsProcess options

SI

Architecture Exploration for 3D• To find the technology/design sweet-spot

(including cost modeling) • To provide IP necessary for 3D design and

understand its technology requirements• To analyse the impact of 3D on

architectures

3D Process Technology R&D• To R&D 3D technologies for reliable

stacking and interconnection of heterogeneous components

• To outperform existing 2D technologies in cost, power, performance and time-2-market

3D Technology Assessment & Prototyping• To demonstrate process steps and basic

integration• To demonstrate a reliable and yielding

base-line process• To establish a modeling environment,

basic design kit and design rule check • To provide prototype capabilities for 3D

(including design flow)

Outputs:Stack cost

PerformancePower

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 4

PathFinding @ The Core of introducing 3D

Design Rules & Models

TechnologyAssessment

IP Exploration(e.g. 3D NoC)

IP Models

GDSII

Technology Research

Process Modules

System Design

RTL toGDSII

Manufacturing& Test

Architecture

Inputs: Design optionsProcess options

SI

Architecture Exploration for 3D• To find the technology/design sweet-spot

(including cost modeling) • To provide IP necessary for 3D design and

understand its technology requirements• To analyse the impact of 3D on

architectures

3D Process Technology R&D• To R&D 3D technologies for reliable

stacking and interconnection of heterogeneous components

• To outperform existing 2D technologies in cost, power, performance and time-2-market

3D Technology Assessment & Prototyping• To demonstrate process steps and basic

integration• To demonstrate a reliable and yielding

base-line process• To establish a modeling environment,

basic design kit and design rule check • To provide prototype capabilities for 3D

(including design flow)

Outputs:Stack cost

PerformancePower

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 5

3D TSV Technology Roadmap

Via size

Via pitch

Wafer thickness

TechnologyProgramme

Interconnect Hierarchy Bondpad (0-level) Global

levelIntermediate level

Local interconnect

• Use of standard Si• Multi-source possible• Post-foundry process• D2D or D2W stacking• Mainly parallel process• Strongly Cost driven

• Cu nail process in foundry• Thinning/stacking post-

foundry process• D2W or W2W stacking• Key: D2W/W2W alignment

accuracy, speed and yield• Mainly parallel process

• Fully foundry level process• Requires use of SOI wafers• only W2W stacking possible• Extreme W2W alignment

accuracy required • Sequential process flow• Compound yield issues

80 um

100 um

50 um 1 um

10 um

5 um 2 um

4 um

100 nm

1 um 200 nm

Active layer only - SOI

500 nm25 um

40 um

50 um 15 um20 um

5 um

50 um 30 um

10 um

10 um

20 um

30 um

3D-WLP TSV 3D-SIC Cu-nails TSV 3D-IC Sub-μ TSV

IIAP 3D-WLP IIAP 3D-SIC

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 6

3D Interconnect TechnologyDevelopments at IMEC

HR-SI rf-IPD wafer (100µm)

SiO2 layer

Metal 1(Al)

Polymerlayer

Electroplated Cu layer

IC1

IC3IC2

Cu nail

landing pad

BCB

3D-SIC Cu-nail TSV 3D-WLP Ultra-thin

Chip stackingCu/polymer TSV

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 7

PathFinding @ The Core of introducing 3D

Design Rules & Models

TechnologyAssessment

IP Exploration(e.g. 3D NoC)

IP Models

GDSII

Technology Research

Process Modules

System Design

RTL toGDSII

Manufacturing& Test

Architecture

Inputs: Design optionsProcess options

SI

Architecture Exploration for 3D• To find the technology/design sweet-spot

(including cost modeling) • To provide IP necessary for 3D design and

understand its technology requirements• To analyse the impact of 3D on

architectures

3D Process Technology R&D• To R&D 3D technologies for reliable

stacking and interconnection of heterogeneous components

• To outperform existing 2D technologies in cost, power, performance and time-2-market

3D Technology Assessment & Prototyping• To demonstrate process steps and basic

integration• To demonstrate a reliable and yielding

base-line process• To establish a modeling environment,

basic design kit and design rule check • To provide prototype capabilities for 3D

(including design flow)

Outputs:Stack cost

PerformancePower

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 8

Test Chip Design

• Test Structures for Design Rule Assessment– TSV characteristics: capacitance, resistance, yield, stack alignment, …

– Impact of TSV and of relative process on transistors

– Impact of TSV and of relative process on wires

– Diode-based thermometers, hot-spot heaters to be placed in different chip locations

– Structures for processing and for std tests

– RF test structures

– Dedicated test structures by our partners

– Small 3D circuits (e.g. ring oscillator with stages distributed in different chip level, …)

• For 200mm wafers (2 metal layers -130nm platform technology)

• TSV: Via diameter: 5um/Via pitch: 10um• D2W and W2W possibilities at the same

time

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 9

Design rule and model assessment of TSVs

Basic process modules knowhow

Design rules & models

First Silicon Predictive Modeling

BottomDie

TopDie

Diagram Not To Scale

BCB

PMDM1

MN

IMD

TSV

Cdep

Cox

P-Si Substrate

IMD

Copper

Copper

BottomDie

TopDie

Diagram Not To Scale

BCB

PMDM1

MN

IMD

TSV

Cdep

Cox

P-Si Substrate

IMD

Copper

Copper

PathFinding flow & Basic Design Kit

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 10

PathFinding @ The Core of introducing 3D

Design Rules & Models

TechnologyAssessment

IP Exploration(e.g. 3D NoC)

IP Models

GDSII

Technology Research

Process Modules

System Design

RTL toGDSII

Manufacturing& Test

Architecture

Inputs: Design optionsProcess options

SI

Architecture Exploration for 3D• To find the technology/design sweet-spot

(including cost modeling) • To provide IP necessary for 3D design and

understand its technology requirements• To analyse the impact of 3D on

architectures

3D Process Technology R&D• To R&D 3D technologies for reliable

stacking and interconnection of heterogeneous components

• To outperform existing 2D technologies in cost, power, performance and time-2-market

3D Technology Assessment & Prototyping• To demonstrate process steps and basic

integration• To demonstrate a reliable and yielding

base-line process• To establish a modeling environment,

basic design kit and design rule check • To provide prototype capabilities for 3D

(including design flow)

Outputs:Stack cost

PerformancePower

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 11

Path finding - a first illustration

IMEC’s SDR next generation

3D Integration Scenarios

Performance Analysis for Various Technology ParametersPreliminary cost analysis

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7

4.8

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2

TSV capacitance (pF)

Crit

ical

pat

h de

lay

(ns)

Baseline 2D design

3D on 2D area

3D on 1/2 2D area

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 12

Manufacturing cost of 3D SIC

• Assumptions– Area of 2D 45nm baseline SDR:

34mm2

– 3D technology: TSV 10µm

– Homogeneous technology layers, custom fabricated

– Manufacturing cost is dominant

• Conclusions– 3D using older (65nm)

technology is never attractivecompared to 2D 45nm baseline

– 3D using 45nm technology is only attractive on the short term

• But ...

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

2006.5 2007 2007.5 2008 2008.5 2009 2009.5 2010 2010.5

Year

Rel

.co

st

65nm - W2W + F2F D2W 45nm - W2W + F2F D2W

65nm - D2W 45nm - D2W

45nm -2D

3D 65nm scenario 1

3D 65nm scenario 2

2D 45 nmbaseline

3D 45nm scenario 1 & 2

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 13

Manufacturing cost of 3D SIC

• Assumptions– Area of 2D 45nm baseline SDR:

102mm2

• Becoming attractive for $– Lower yield loss (smaller dies)

– Importance increases for scaled technologies

• More opportunities need to be explored:

– Heterogeneous technologies

– Smaller volumes when NRE is dominant

– Commodity components

• Top-down path finding allows co-exploration of technology and design

– In light of cost

-

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2006.5 2007 2007.5 2008 2008.5 2009 2009.5 2010 2010.5

Year

Re

l.co

st

65nm - W2W + F2F D2W 45nm - W2W + F2F D2W

65nm - D2W 45nm - D2W

45nm -2D

2D 45nmbaseline

3D 65nm

3D 45nm

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 14

L2D1

L2D2

L2I2

L2I1

AD#1AD#2

AD#3

AD#6

AD#5AD#4

ARM

L2D1

L2D2

L2I2

L2I1

L2D1

L2D2

L2I2

L2I1

ARM

AD#1AD#2

AD#3

AD#6

AD#5AD#4

ARM

AD#1AD#2

AD#3

AD#6

AD#5AD#4

AD#1AD#2

AD#3

L1#6

L1#5

L1#4

L1#1L1#2

L1#3

AD#6

AD#5AD#4

L1#1L1#2

L1#3 L1#6

L1#5

L1#4

AD#1AD#2

AD#3AD#6

AD#5AD#4

3D-NOC

3D L1

3D DRAM to substitute badly scaling SRAM

• Small memories scale badly below 45nm due to process variations

• Companies ask us: “provide us with possible alternatives”?

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 15© imec 2007

3D DRAM as replacement for embedded SRAM -Preliminary results

Paul Marchal© imec restricted 2007 1515

• DRAM cells are 10x smaller compared to SRAM • More than 2x area reduction by just changing the cell on a SRAM matrix• Further reduction is possible, by optimizing the peripherals

• Similar read/write power for same performance• Less power to retain data ( 496 54 pW/bits), because refresh power is less compared to SRAM cell leakage• TSV power cost can be contained

128 Kbits

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 0.1 0.5Activity @ f= 500MHz

PS

RA

M /

PD

RA

M

128kB memory@500Mhz

More savings for infrequently

used memories (e.g., L2s)

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 16

3D: Partnering for Cost Effective Research

MemoryIDM

3D Program

LogicIDM

STMicroelectronicsSTMicroelectronics

Foundries

Equipment& MaterialsSuppliers

LamRESEARCH

SAT

EDA

Fabless

Rudy Lauwereins© imec 2008 17