Lattes Platform: the Methodological Steps
-
Upload
roberto-c-s-pacheco -
Category
Education
-
view
3.248 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Lattes Platform: the Methodological Steps
Roberto C. S. PachecoINSTITUTO STELA - Research Leader
Lattes PlatformThe methodological steps
http://lattes.cnpq.br
euroCRIS Members MeetingLisbon, 10 November 2005
Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão (ISEG). Edif. 2. Room 203. Second Floor
ST&I Indicators: How was the process before…
70-80’s
80-90’s
Paper Forms
Electronic Forms Main problems• Multiple sources of information• Lack of standards • Multiple efforts in S&T communities• Waste of public funds• Institutional system is not involved
ST&I Indicators
Relational DB
Homogeneous sources
Fundamental Questions to ICT
Who are the players involved with ST&I
How each one of these players interact (use and create)
information
Which ST&I processes should be considered
ICT is being Applied in all S&T Processes
INVESTIMENTS
In the outputs of a national ST&I system
In the inputs of a national ST&I system
In the processes of a national ST&I system
KNOWLEDGECREATION
MANAGEMENTTRANSACTIONAL
PROCESSES
ICTChallenge
Is to meet all processes and all S&T players
information needs
Processes and Players: ST&I Knowledge Support, Production, Planning and Benefit
Researchers
Students
Alumni
Grad. coord.
Managers
Professionals
Entrepreneurs
Technicians
Faculty
Staff
Managers
Multipliers
Generation supporters
Beneficiaries
Producers
Players Knowledge
Textual Databases
Relational Databases
Rules
Managers ProfessionalsStudents New ActorsResearchers
Web Sites, Portals
ScienTI Instruments and their goals
PLAYERS
PROCESS
INFORMATIONSOURCES
VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES
ScienTI Analysis Units
ScienTI Instruments: CvLAC
S&T Contents in CvLAC• Identification• Addresses• Level of Education• Profesional experience• Knowledge fields • Idioms• Prizes and Titles• Projects• Bibliographic production• Technical production• Supervisions• Complementary information
Information Resources• Homepage automatic• CV Indicators• Export to several formats• Easy error verification
Standards and Interoperability
Standard Community of practice2000-2004
CV
s
ResearchersStudentsProfesionals
CvDeGois
CvLattes
CvLAC
Research Group Leaders
Sistema Grupo
Sistema GrupLAC
Investimentos em CT&IScienTI System - Players
Managers in ST&I
InvestmentsCT&I
Universities
Link Analysis
Former Students
ST&I Organizations
Cv Viewer
Gru
ps
ScienTI Network Conceptual Architecture
Sistema Grupo
GrupLAC
CvDeGois
CvLattes
CvLAC
DM Cv DM Gr DM Inst DM Proj
Investiments Indicators
Analysis Systems
Searches
CVs Groups Institutions Projects
SCienTI Directories
ScienTI Portals
ScienTI Brazil – Indicators
Movimento acumulado entre 01/05 e 19/06 de 2002
0
20.000
40.000
60.000
80.000
100.000
120.000
1/5/02 8/5/02 15/5/02 22/5/02 29/5/02 5/6/02 12/6/02 19/6/02
Dias
Nú
mer
o a
cum
ula
do
Novos Atualizados total
1,8 milion access a year
+610.000100 mil CVs per year
19.140 research groups in more
than 200 institutions
ST&I Investments
ST&I Investments
ScienTI Brazil – ST&I Investments
ScienTI Brazil – ST&I Investments
ScienTI Brazil – ST&I Investments
ScienTI Brazil – ST&I Investments
CV Former Students
ScienTI Brazil – CV Former Students Analysis
ScienTI Brazil – Institutional Views
RS
SP
BA
MG
RJ
PR
DF
GO
PA
PB
AL
Lattes Network – Institutional Levels
Examples
CNPqCAPESFINEP
FAPESP
FUNCITEC
FACEPE
FUNAPE
FAPEMIG
FAPERGS
FAPERJ
FAPEAL
Lattes Network – Public Agencies Level
Concluding Remarks• Methodology
– Standards– Classifications, international references
(difficult to live with organizational specificities)
– Flexible– How to expand horizontal and vertically without destroying the
reference model
– Free from specific technologies– Research is always there
• Redundancy (production in the CVs)• Entities relationship management on a decentralized flow system• Knowledge systems
• Collaboration is in place– it is not a matter of hiring a software house or even to
build up in house
Concluding Remarks• New Public decision maker mentality
– We are not talking about “informatics”;– If the systems work fine they will not be “ours” anymore: (knowledge
society effect)– Careful with the “call center”
• The issue of “convincing” the Researches:– Ex: identification, public x private information– The key is how to make them say “this is my CV”
• Transparency x Ownership– What to do with “non certified” information?– You have to trust in the researcher word!!!– You have also to be prepared to the “pointed out” effect
• Internationally– Idioms (but also culture) issues– Political timing x needing timing
Roberto C. S. PachecoINSTITUTO STELA - Research Leader
Lattes PlatformThe methodological steps
http://lattes.cnpq.br
euroCRIS Members MeetingLisbon, 10 November 2005
Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão (ISEG). Edif. 2. Room 203. Second Floor
Muito Obrigado!!