Large-size micromegas for ATLAS (MAMMA)

21
Large-size micromegas for ATLAS (MAMMA) Status and prospects RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011 Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 1

description

Large-size micromegas for ATLAS (MAMMA). Status and prospects. The first large prototype (Nov 2009). Dimensions: 1.5 x 0.5 m 2 Six separate (standard) mesh sections Strip lengths: 0.4 and 1 m Strip pitches: 250 and 500 µm Test beam: July 2010 L ong strips: noise x 2, but nice signals. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Large-size micromegas for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Page 1: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 1

Large-size micromegas for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Status and prospects

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

Page 2: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 2

The first large prototype (Nov 2009)

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

Dimensions: 1.5 x 0.5 m2

Six separate (standard) mesh sections Strip lengths: 0.4 and 1 m Strip pitches: 250 and 500 µm Test beam: July 2010 Long strips: noise x 2, but nice signals

Page 3: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 3

Next step: CSC-size chamber MM chamber with the

same dimensions as the large Cathode Strip Chambers (CSC) in the ATLAS forward muon system

Dimensions: approx. 1.2 x 1.2 m2, wedge-shaped

Largest chambers of Small Wheel are now MDTs (drift tubes) with 2.4 x 1.2m2

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

ATLASCathode strip chambers (CSC)

MDT

Page 4: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 4

The ATLAS Small Wheel

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

CSC chambers

Page 5: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 5

CSC-size chamber: constraints & plans

Constraint: the size of the machines in the CERN PCB workshopTherefore we opted to start with half-size MMs in a common

detector housing The plan:

Start with a standard, half-size MM (non-resistive) to test the procedure (fall 2010) Construct a half-size MM chamber with resistive strips (end 2010) Add 2nd half-size layer (spring) Full-size layer, when new machines available (summer) Construction of a 4-layer chamber (fall 2010) Installation in ATLAS during LHC shutdown 2012 (or 2013)

… and reality: Non-resistive MM completed begin of November Resistive MM completed begin of January (exactly 1 week ago)

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

Page 6: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

6

50 mm

20 mm

10 mm

5 mm

530 mm(520 mm active) 5 mm

20 mm20 mm

Connection pad

FE card (2 APV25)

GND

1024 mm

76.3 °

Max width of PCB for production = 645 mm

Width of final PCB = 605 mmGas outlet

Gas inlet

F/E card50 x 120 mm2

Connection padNumber of strips = 2048

Strip pitch = 0.5 mmStrip width = 0.25 mm8 FE cards

Distance b/w screws128 mm

HV mesh + drift (2 x SHV)

Micromegas

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011Joerg Wotschack (CERN)

Page 7: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 7

Mechanics – detector housing

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

PCB with micromegas structureTo be inserted here

Foam/FR4 sandwich with aluminium frame

Stiffening panel

Spacer frame, defines drift gap

Cover & drift electrode

Page 8: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 8

A) Standard MM (C1) 2048 circular strips Strip pitch: 0.5 mm 8 connectors with 256

contacts each Mesh: 400 lines/inch 5 mm high frame

defines drift space O-ring for gas seal Closed by a 10 mm

foam sandwich panel serving at the same time as drift electrode

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

Dummy PCB

Page 9: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 9

Cover and drift electrode

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

Page 10: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 10

Drift electrode HV connection

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

HV connectionspring

O-ring seal

Al spacer frame

Page 11: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 11

Chamber closed Assembly extremely

simple, takes a few minutes

Signals routed out without soldered connectors

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

Page 12: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 12

First experience with C1 (ongoing) C1 is a standard MM with a mesh area ≈0.4 m2 (50 times the

area of 10 x 10 cm2 MMs) => high rate of sparks(Mesh-GND capacity ≈35 nF, still small compared to

buffer capacity of 100 nF used in HV input line of small MMs) Tests performed, so far:

Connectivity – OK Noise vs strip length – OK Spark signals – large currents APV25 hybrid spark protection

… and took a some cosmic events (signals look normal)

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

Page 13: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 13

Pedestal noise (APV25)

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

Strips connected to ground

Non-connected APV channels

Typical pedestal variation on 10 x 10 cm2 MMNote: zero- suppressed scale

ADC

coun

ts (2

00 e

- )

Channels connected to r/o strips

Page 14: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 14

Pedestal fluctuation vs strip length

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

Typical pedestal variation on 10 x 10 cm2 MM

Strip length: 25 cm 50 cm

Page 15: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 15

Sparks and … their effect

Connected C1 to APV25 to test spark protection of hybrid card

Successfully destroyed 52 diodes (not connected channels survived)

Examples of spark signals as seen on the oscilloscope (on 50 Ω, attenuated 1:100)

Spark pulses of few hundred volts (compared to 0.5 V for the MM with resistive strips)

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

Page 16: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 16

Conclusion from C1

Chamber construction worked fine Easy assembly, gas-tight Behaves like other standard MM chambers No dark currents But many sparks (large area) Sparks lead to large HV drops and big currents Confirms earlier conclusion: Need spark protection

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

Page 17: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 17

B) MM with resistive-strips (CR1) Follow the same scheme

as for R11–R16 Thin insulation layer +

resistive strips above readout strips

Resistive strips are connected to ground through RGND ≈ 200 MΩ

Resistivity along strips Rstrip ≈ 100 MΩ/cm

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

Page 18: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 18

Construction of CR1 Same PCB as for C1 500

µm strip pitch Same mesh as C1(400

lines/inch) Spark-protection

scheme as for R11–R16 Resistive strips only

above connected strips Resistive paste with

higher resistance values

RGND≈200 MΩ Rstrip≈100 MΩ/cm

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011

CR1 during polishing of resistive layer

Page 19: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

19

Production problems with CR1 Mesh wavy (slipped during curing) Ohmig connection between mesh

an ground (R ≈ few GΩ), compatible with resistance along the strips

Likely: connection of one (or few strips) to mesh

Visual inspection w/o success Resistive protection works Protection very effective,

impurities cannot be burned with high currents

Resistive strips cannot be easily isolated => Need to change concept

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011 Joerg Wotschack (CERN)

Page 20: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

20

What next ? Another chamber with resistive strips, hopefully in a few weeks

Prevent slipping of mesh Better mesh fixation during curing process Stiffer mesh (400 -> 325 lines/inch ?) Other solutions …

Change connection concept of resistive strips Connect resistive strips to readout strips ? Other solutions …

Test concepts with small MM(s) In parallel work on optimization of

Layout of readout board (strip width, signal routing, connectivity) Resistivity values for RGND and Rstrip

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011 Joerg Wotschack (CERN)

Page 21: Large-size  micromegas  for ATLAS (MAMMA)

Joerg Wotschack (CERN) 21

Conlusions + prospects Good progress with full-size MM, very useful exercise, but we

are not yet there Mechanics look very promising, simple and easily extendable

to multi-layer chambers Connectivity to readout electronics is good MM production needs a second iteration with a more reliable

mesh deposition and curing procedure Resistive-strip protection seems to work, but the strip

connection scheme needs to be revisited for easier diagnostics/repairs

Next resistive chamber to be expected by about Easter

RD51 mini week, 17/01/2011