Lansing (MI) City Council info packet for Monday's July 25 meeting

REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10TH FLOOR LANSING CITY HALL

124 W. MICHIGAN AVENUE

AGENDA FOR JULY 25, 2011 TO THE HON. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL:

The following items were listed on the agenda in the City Clerk's Office by 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 21, 2011, in accordance with Section 3-103(2) of the City Charter and will be ready for your consideration at the regular meeting of the City Council on Monday, July 25, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers, 10th Floor, City Hall.

I. ROLL CALL

II. MEDITATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

III. READING AND APPROVAL OF PRINTED COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS

Approval of the Printed Council Proceedings of July 11, 2011

IV. CONSIDERATION OF LATE ITEMS (Suspension of Council Rule #9 is needed to allow consideration of late items. Late items will be considered as part of the regular portion of the meeting to which they relate.)

V. TABLED ITEMS

VI. SPECIAL CEREMONIES

1. Tribute; Declaring Monday, July 25, 2011 as Power of We AmeriCorps Day in the City of Lansing

VII. COMMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CITY CLERK

VIII. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (Time, place, purpose, or definition of event – 1 minute limit)

IX. SPEAKER REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON LEGISLATIVE MATTERS

X. MAYOR’S COMMENTS

XI. SHOW CAUSE HEARINGS

XII. PUBLIC COMMENT ON LEGISLATIVE MATTERS (Legislative matters consist of the following items on the agenda: public hearings, resolutions, ordinances for introduction, and ordinances for passage. The public may comment for up to three minutes. Speakers must sign up on white form.)

1

2

A. SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. In consideration of an ordinance of the City of Lansing to add Chapter 1285 to the Lansing Codified Ordinances to Require and Encourage Provision of Bicycle Parking

XIII. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATIVE MATTERS

A. REFERRAL OF PUBLIC HEARINGS

B. CONSENT AGENDA

1. BY COUNCIL MEMBERS KATHIE DUNBAR, ERIC HEWITT, TINA HOUGHTON, BRIAN JEFFRIES, DERRICK QUINNEY, A’LYNNE ROBINSON AND JESSICA YORKO

a. Tribute; In recognition of New Mount Calvary Baptist Church’s 47th Anniversary

2. BY COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA YORKO

a. Tribute; Declaring Monday, July 25, 2011 as Power of We AmeriCorps Day in the City of Lansing

3. BY THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING

a. Act-2-2011;. Construction of Lansing 2011 Federal Congestion Management Air Quality (CMAQ) Waverly Road Pathway

b. Act-5-2010; Conveyance of Easement on LBWL Riverfront Property to AT&T

c. SLU-2-2011; 1122 W. Holmes Road, request by Esteban Chavez to utilize property located at 1122 W. Holmes Road, Suite 3 (Logan Shopping Center) for a Church

4. BY THE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL SERVICES

a. Confirmation of Appointment of Edwina Marshall to the Human Relations and Community Services Board for a 1st Ward Term to Expire June 30, 2013

b. Appropriation of Community Funding to Lansing for Cesar E. Chavez for its Latino/Tejano Showcase to be held September 10, 2011

5. BY THE COMMITTEE ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

a. Confirmation of Appointment of Anthony McCloud to the Board of Water and Light Board of Commissioners for a 3rd Ward Term to Expire June 30, 2015

3

6. BY THE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS

a. Workers’ Compensation Claim #2011768MLM10

b. 2011-2013 Principal Shopping District Special Assessment

C. RESOLUTIONS FOR ACTION

D. REPORTS FROM COUNCIL COMMITTEES

E. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION and Setting of Public Hearings

1. BY COUNCIL MEMBER JEFFRIES, CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING

a. Introduction of Z-1-2011; 601 N. Pennsylvania Avenue, rezoning the property at this location from "DM-3" Residential District to "D-1" Professional Office District to allow the building at this location to be used for administrative offices for the Neogen Corporation, and setting a Public Hearing for August 22, 2011

b. Introduction of Z-2-2011; 2331 N. Larch Street, rezoning the property at this location from "J" Parking District to "F" Commercial District to allow for future construction of a building on the area of the site that is currently zoned “J” Parking, and setting a Public Hearing for August 22, 2011

c. Introduction of an Ordinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the City of Lansing located in Ingham County, State of Michigan, under Act 230, of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, and to designate regulated flood hazard areas under the provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, and setting a Public Hearing for August 8, 2011

F. ORDINANCES FOR PASSAGE

1. BY THE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL SERVICES

a. Adoption of an ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to add Chapter 876 of the Lansing Codified Ordinances establishing a procedure for recognition of a Service Organization, as described by MCL 432.103(k)(ii)

b. Adoption of an Ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to Amend Chapter 805 of the Lansing Codified Ordinances by eliminating the requirement that each auction held in the city be separately licensed

4

2. BY THE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES

a. Adoption of an Ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to Amend Chapter 1046 of the Lansing Codified Ordinances by making changes approved by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and required by Federal Law

XIV. SPEAKER REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON CITY GOVERNMENT RELATED MATTERS

XV. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS, BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS; COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS; AND OTHER CITY RELATED MATTERS (Motion that all items be considered as being read in full and that the proper referrals be made by the President)

1. REPORTS FROM CITY OFFICERS, BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS

a. Letter from the City Clerk submitting Minutes of Boards and Authorities placed on file in the City Clerk’s Office

b. Letter(s) from the Mayor re:

i. Floodplain Development Management; Designating an Enforcing Agency and Designating Regulated Flood Hazard Areas

2. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, AND OTHER CITY RELATED MATTERS

a. Letter from the State of Michigan Liquor Control Commission providing 15-Day notice of an application from Golden Temple, Inc. requesting to Transfer Ownership of 2011 Specially Designated Distributor (SDD) and Specially Designated Merchant (SDM) licensed business located at 815 W. Edgewood Blvd., Suite B from I&J, Inc.

b. Letter from Mary Sabaj, Ingham/Lansing Community Corrections Manager regarding Fiscal Year 2012 State Funding Application, Michigan Department of Corrections and Sub-Contracts for Community Corrections Programs

c. Letter from the Historical Society of Greater Lansing regarding the establishment of a local historical museum

d. Letter from the Lansing Neighborhood Council in support of an Application for Community Funding submitted by Wexford Montessori School PTA for its Community Celebration to be held August 27, 2011

e. Letter from Kyle Vandecar of 630 Hillcrest Ave., East Lansing in response to a Snow and Ice Removal Assessment for Winter 2010-11 for property located at 650 Louisa St.

XVI. MOTION OF EXCUSED ABSENCE

5

XVII. REMARKS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS

XVIII. REMARKS BY THE MAYOR OR EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT

XIX. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CITY GOVERNMENT RELATED MATTERS (City government related matters are issues or topics relevant to the operation or governance of the city. The public may comment for up to three minutes. Speakers must sign up on yellow form.)

XX. ADJOURNMENT

CHRIS SWOPE, CITY CLERK

Persons with disabilities who need an accommodation to fully participate in this meeting should contact the City Clerk’s Office at (517) 483-4131 (TDD (517) 483-4479). 24 hour notice may be needed for certain accommodations. An attempt will be made to grant all reasonable accommodation requests.

CITY OF LANSINGNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held on Monday, July 25,2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 10th Floor Lansing City Hall, 124 W.Michigan Ave., Lansing, MI for the purpose of considering an Ordinance of the City ofLansing, Michigan, to Add Chapter 1285 to the Lansing Codified Ordinances to requireand encourage provision of bicycle parking. For more information please call 483-4177.

Interested Persons are invited to attend this Public Hearing

CHRIS SWOPE, LANSING CITY CLERK

Draft #1.6March 29, 2011

1

ORDINANCE NO.

2

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN, TO ADD CHAPTER

3 1285 OF THE LANSING CODIFIED ORDINANCES TO REQUIRE AND ENCOURAGE

4 PROVISION OF BICYCLE PARKING.

5

THE CITY OF LANSING ORDAINS:

6

Section 1. That Chapter 1285 be and is hereby added to the Codified Ordinances of the

7 City of Lansing, Michigan, to read as follows:

8 CHAPTER 1285. BICYCLE PARKING

9 1285.01. DEFINITIONS

10 FOR PURPOSES OF THIS CHAPTER:

11 APBP GUIDELINES MEANS THE 2ND EDITION OF THE BICYCLE PARKING

12 GUIDELINES ISSUED BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE

13 PROFESSIONALS.

14 BICY CLE LOCKER MEANS A LOCKED COMPARTMENT FOR THE STORAGE OF A

15 SINGLE BICYCLE.

16 BICY CLE PARKING SPACE MEANS A SECURE STRUCTURE DESIGNED AND

17 AVAILABLE EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE STORAGE OF A BICYCLE.

18 BICY CLE ROOM MEANS A LOCKED ROOM USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE STORAGE

19 OF BICYCLES, WITH ACCESS LIMITED TO USERS OF BICYCLES TO BE STORED IN

20 THE ROOM.

21 LONG-TERM BICY CLE PARKING SPACE MEANS A BICYCLE PARKING SPACE THAT

22 IS COVERED AND ENCLOSED ON ALL FOUR SIDES.

1C:\DOCUME-1\KREEVE-1.LAN\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc


1 SHORT-TERM BICY CLE PARKING SPACE MEANS ANY BICYCLE PARKING SPACE

2 THAT IS NOT A LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING SPACE.

3 1285.02. REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES

4 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANY

5 STRUCTURE IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1285.04 OR SECTION 1285.05 FOR WHICH,

6 AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE, A SITE PLAN MUST BE

7 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING OFFICE.

8 1285.03. BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES

9 (a) TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE AND UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY THIS

10 CHAPTER, PROPERTY OWNERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONFORM TO THE APBP

11 GUIDELINES, COPIES OF WHICH ARE AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING OFFICE.

12 (b) UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR:

13 (1) DURING THE OPERATING HOURS OF THE STRUCTURE IDENTIFIED IN

14 SECTIONS 1285.04 AND 1285.05, BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY THIS

15 CHAPTER SHALL BE LIT AT AN ILLUMINATION LEVEL OF AT LEAST .4

16 FOOTCANDLES.

17 (2) BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF AN

18 ENTRANCE TO THE STRUCTURE.

19 (3) BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE ADEQUATELY MAINTAINED AND KEPT

20 FREE OF MUD, DEBRIS, ICE, AND SNOW.

21 (c) UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, EACH

22 SHORT-TERM BICYCLE PARKING SPACE PROVIDED PURSUANT TO THE

23 PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER MUST SUPPORT A BICYCLE IN AN UPRIGHT

2C:\DOCUME-1\KREEVE--l.LAN\LOCALS-l\Temp\XPgrpwise\BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc


1 POSITION; ALLOW BOTH THE BICYCLE FRAME AND THE FRONT WHEEL TO BE

2 LOCKED; BE SECURELY ANCHORED TO A HARD SURFACE, SUCH AS ASPHALT,

3 CONCRETE, OR BRICK PAVERS, MEASURING AT LEAST 6 FEET BY 2 FEET; AND BE

4 CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS THAT RESIST CUTTING, RUSTING, BENDING, AND

5 DEFORMATION.

6 (d) UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, LONG-

7 TERM BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF

8 THIS CHAPTER MUST BE PROVIDED IN (1) BICYCLE LOCKERS THAT ENSURE

9 ADEQUATE CLEARANCE FOR SIMULTANEOUS USERS; (2) BICYCLE RACKS IN

10 LOCKED CAGES; OR (3) BICYCLE ROOMS.

11 (e) THE FOLLOWING BICYCLE RACK STYLES, AS DESCRIBED IN THE

12 RECOMMENDED RACKS AND ACCEPTABLE RACKS SECTIONS OF THE APBP

13 GUIDELINES, SATISFY THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER FOR THE SPECIFIED

14 NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES:

15 (1) EACH INVERTED U BICYCLE RACK PROVIDES 2 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES.

16 (2) EACH POST AND RING BICYCLE RACK PROVIDES 2 BICYCLE PARKING

17 SPACES.

18 (3) EACH WALL-MOUNTED BICYCLE RACK PROVIDES 1 BICYCLE PARKING

19 SPACE.

20 (4) EACH WHEELWELL-SECURED BICYCLE RACK PROVIDES 1 BICYCLE PARKING

21 SPACE PER WHEELWELL.

22 (5) EACH MODIFIED COATHANGER BICYCLE RACK PROVIDES 1 BICYCLE

23 PARKING SPACE PER MODIFIED COATHANGER.

3C:\DOCUME-1\KREEVE-1.LAN\LOCALS-4\Temp\XPgrpwise\BICYCLEPARKING 1285 D.doc


1 (6) EACH TWO-TI KR OR DOUBLE DECKER BICYCLE RACK PROVIDES 1 BICYCLE

2 PARKING SPACE PER TRAY.

3 1285.04. BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS BASED ON LAND USE

4 (a) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:

5 (1) EVERY 24 INCHES OF BENCH SEATING SHALL BE COUNTED AS ONE SEAT.

6 (2) NUMBERS RESULTING FROM THE PRESCRIBED FORMULAS SHALL BE

7 ROUNDED UP FROM 1A TO THE NEXT WHOLE NUMBER IN CALCULATING THE

8 NUMBER OF REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES.

9 (b) NO BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED IN THE G-1 BUSINESS DISTRICT

10 UNLESS OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED, IN WHICH CASE A

11 NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES EQUAL TO 5% OF THE NUMBER OF OFF-

12 STREET PARKING SPACES, WITH A MINIMUM OF TWO BICYCLE PARKING SPACES,

13 IS REQUIRED. IN ALL OTHER DISTRICTS, PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL PROVIDE

14 THE FOLLOWING NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES FOR THE BENEFIT OF

15 THE CORRESPONDING SPECIFIED STRUCTURES:

STRUCTUREREQUIRED NUMBER OF

BICYCLE PARKINGSPACES

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL2 FOR EVERY 10

DWELLING UNITS

CHURCHES2 FOR EVERY 50 SEATS IN

THE MAIN UNIT OFWORSHIP

LODGING 2 FOR EVERY 50 UNITSATHLETIC CLUBS AND FITNESS CENTERS 2 FOR EVERY 500 SQUARE

FEET OF USABLE FLOORAREA, WITH A MAXIMUM

OF 3 0

LIBRARIES AND MUSEUMSPLANNED DEVELOPMENTS AND SHOPPING

CENTERSRETAIL STORES NOT OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED

BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS'rnrnTr inr nr, A irrr\Trr A T nT r1rnQ QT(^^T A T Q U

AT T TTT

4C:\DOCUME-4\KREEVE4l.LAN\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise \BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc


CLINICS, AND MEDICAL CENTERSGAS STATIONS

SPORTS ARENAS AND STADIUMS 2 FOR EVERY 250 SEATS,WITH A MAXIMUM OF 30

THEATERS AND AUDITORIUMS 2 FOR EVERY 100 SEATS,WITH A MAXIMUM OF 30

EATING AND DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS 2 FOR EVERY 24 SEATS

OFFICES NOT OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED

2 FOR EVERY 5,000SQUARE FEET OF USABLE

FLOOR AREA, WITH AMINIMUM OF 2

2 FOR EVERY 20,000INDUSTRIAL, MANUFACTURING, WHOLESALE,

AND RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENTSSQUARE FEET OF USABLE

FLOOR AREA, WITH AMINIMUM OF 2

COMMERCIAL OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES2 FOR EVERY 20 VEHICLEPARKING SPACES, WITH A

. MAXIMUM OF 30

CONSUMER REPAIR SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS

2 FOR EVERY 3,000SQUARE FEET OF USABLE

FLOOR AREA, WITH AMINIMUM OF 2 AND A

MAXIM UM OF 30

CEMETERIES, MAUSOLEUMS, AND PARKS2 .FOR EVERY 20,000

SQUARE FEET OF LAND,WITH A MAXIMUM OF 10

1

2 1285.05. LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS BASED ON3 EMPLOYMENT AND TRANSIT45 (a) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, NUMBERS RESULTING FROM THE

6 PRESCRIBED FORMULAS SHALL BE ROUNDED UP FROM %2 TO THE NEXT WHOLE

7 NUMBER IN CALCULATING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED LONG-TERM BICYCLE

8 PARKING SPACES.

9 (b) NO BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED IN THE G-1 BUSINESS

10 DISTRICT. IN ALL OTHER DISTRICTS, IN ADDITION TO ANY REQUIREMENTS

11 IMPOSED BY SECTION 1285.04, PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL PROVIDE THE

5C:\DOCUME-1\KREEVE-I.LAN\LOCALS-1\ Temp \XPgrpwise\BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc


1 FOLLOWING NUMBER OF LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING SPACES FOR THE

2 BENEFIT OF THE CORRESPONDING SPECIFIED STRUCTURES:

3 (1) STRUCTURES IN WHICH MORE THAN 40 EMPLOYEES WORK AT ANY GIVEN

4 TIME: 2 FOR EVERY 40 EMPLOYEES.

5 (2) BUS STATIONS: 2 FOR EVERY BUS BAY.

6 1285.06. ADDITIONAL BICYCLE PARKING SPACES TO OFFSET REQUIRED OFF-7 STREET PARKING SPACES89 THE NUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 1284

10 WILL BE REDUCED BY ONE SPACE, WITH A MAXIMUM REDUCTION OF 20% OF

11 THE NUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 1284,

12 FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:

13 (a) EVERY 6 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED IN EXCESS OF THOSE

14 REQUIRED BY THIS CHAPTER;

15 (b) EVERY 6 BICYCLE PARING SPACES COVERED BY A PERMANENT STRUCTURE

16 APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR IN EXCESS OF THE NUMBER OF

17 LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING SPACE REQUIRED BY THIS CHAPTER.

18 1285.07. WAIVERS

19 (a) A PROPERTY OWNER MAY SEEK A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

20 THIS SECTION BY SUBMITTING A WRITTEN APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF

21 ZONING APPEALS. THE APPLICATION MUST:

22 (1) IDENTIFY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:

23 (A) A DEMONSTRABLE FINANCIAL BURDEN THAT WOULD SUBSTANTIALLY

24 IMPAIR THE PROPERTY OWNER'S FINANCIAL ABILITY TO CONSTRUCT OR

25 STRUCTURALLY ALTER THE STRUCTURE; OR

6C:\DOCUME-l \KREEVE--l.LAN\LOCALS-l \Temp\XPgrpwise\BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc


1 (B) MEASURABLE AND DEMONSTRABLE LACK OF DEMAND FOR THE BICYCLE

2 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY THIS CHAPTER, AS DEMONSTRATED BY A

3 CONSUMER SURVEY OR OTHER METHOD ACCEPTABLE TO THE ZONING

4 ADMINISTRATOR.

5 (2) IDENTIFY THE EXTENT TO WHICH, AND THE MANNER IN WHICH, THE

6 PROPERTY OWNER IS CAPABLE OF AND WILLING TO FULFILL THE OBJECTIVES

7 OF THIS CHAPTER BY PARTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH ITS REQUIREMENTS OR

ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF FULFILLING ITS OBJECTIVES.

9 (b) UPON RECEIPT OF AN APPLICATION MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF

10 SUBSECTION (a), THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS SHALL EITHER GRANT OR

11 DENY THE WAIVER, INCLUDING ANY CONDITIONS FOR PARTIAL COMPLIANCE.

12 IN DETERMINING WHETHER TO GRANT OR DENY THE WAIVER OR GRANT THE

13 WAIVER SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION OF PARTIAL COMPLIANCE, THE BOARD OF

14 ZONING APPEALS SHALL CONSIDER WHETHER THE APPLICANT HAS

15 DEMONSTRATED, TO HIS OR HER SATISFACTION, ONE OF THE BASES FOR A

16 WAIVER REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION (a)(1); THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE

17 APPLICANT HAS DEMONSTRATED GOOD FAITH BY OFFERING PARTIAL

18 COMPLIANCE OR ALTERNATIVES PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (a)(2); THE

19 CHARACTER OF THE STRUCTURE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS; AND THE IMPACT OF

20 THE WAIVER ON THE CHARACTER OF THE STRUCTURE'S SURROUNDINGS AND

21 OWNERS OF OTHER PROPERTY IN THE VICINITY.

22 1285.08. DOWNTOWN BICYCLE PARKING PLAN

7C:\DOCUME-l\KREEVE-l.LAN\LOCALS -1\Temp\XPgrpwise\BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc


10111213141516

171819202122

1 THE PUBLIC SERVICE DEPARTMENT IS ENCOURAGED TO INCLUDE A BICYCLE

2 PARKING PLAN FOR THE G-1 BUSINESS DISTRICT IN ITS [ ].

3

Section 2. All ordinances, resolutions or rules, parts of ordinances, resolutions or rules

4 inconsistent with the provisions hereof are hereby repealed.

5

Section 3. Should any section, clause or phrase of this ordinance be declared to be

6 invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof

7

other than the part so declared to be invalid.

8

Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect on the 30th day after enactment, unless given

9 immediate effect by City Council.

8C:\DOCUME-l\KREEVE-l.LAN\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc

P'j

BY COUNCILMEMBER A'LYNNE ROBINSON, KATHIE DUNBAR, ERIC HEWITT,TINA HOUGHTON, BRIAN JEFFRIES, DERRICK QUINNEY, JESSICA YORKO

RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING

WHEREAS, New Mount Calvary Baptist Church held its first service on August 16,1964, at the YWCA at 217 Townsend Street in Lansing, Michigan; and

WHEREAS, throughout their history, they have had three Pastors; Reverend FerdinandS. Fritz, Reverend Columbus Clayton, and Reverend Dr. Lonnie J. Chipp; and

WHEREAS, Reverend Fritz was Pastor from August 12, 1964 until his passing onDecember 20, 1984, basing his ministry on teaching and discipleship, developing theUrban Center for Continuing Education and Counseling where he regularly taughtclasses in Lansing and Muskegon; and

WHEREAS, after Reverend Fritz' passing in 1984, the Church continued without apastor. Reverend Columbus Clayton assumed the pastorate on October 27, 1985 andremained Pastor until his resignation on December 22, 2007; and

WHEREAS, as Pastor, Reverend Clayton promoted community involvement, anddeveloping new preachers; he was President of the Pastor Conference, and was thedriving force in the building of the current edifice and the church's third and finalrelocation; and

WHEREAS, when Reverend Clayton left the parish, it would be almost two years againbefore the Church had a pastor; and

WHEREAS, Reverend Dr. Lonnie J. Chipp was named Pastor in late 2009, bringingrenewed vitality and interest in evangelism, discipleship, and focusing on meeting theholistic needs of the church body and the community; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council, hereby, wishesto congratulate New Mount Calvary Baptist Church on their 47 th Anniversary. We wishyou continued success!

BY COUNCILMEMBER JESSICA YORKORESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING

WHEREAS, the Power of We Consortium AmeriCorps State members mobilizethousands of volunteers each year in projects that create a more healthy, inclusiveenvironment for Ingham County residents; and

WHEREAS, the Consortium AmeriCorps members teach children and adults how to eathealthier through nutrition education, cooking demonstrations, and school gardens; and

WHEREAS, the Consortium AmeriCorps members encourage exercising by promotingactive transportation, improving the non-motorized transportation environment, andhosting educational events; and

WHEREAS, the Consortium AmeriCorps members support local projects that increaseLansing area residents' access to healthy food, such as community gardens, farmersmarkets, community supported agriculture, and gleaning programs; and

WHEREAS, the Consortium AmeriCorps members create and expand environmentalstewardship programs at our parks and nature centers;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council, hereby, wishesto proclaim July 25, 2011, Power of We AmeriCorps Day in the City of Lansing and tothank the Power of We Consortium, Michigan Community Service Commission, andtheir volunteers for their dedication and service to the city of Lansing and its residents.We wish you success in the future!

BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEERESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING

Act-2-11, Lansing 2011 CMAQ Waverly Road Pathway

WHEREAS, the Lansing Public Service Department requests authorization to construct the Lansing 2011 CMAQWaverly Road Pathway project, which is funded on an 80/20 basis through the Federal Congestion Management AirQuality (CMAQ) program; and

WHEREAS, this project is part of a series of four connected projects in an intergovernmental effort to make non-motorized travel more accessible to the southwest section of Lansing; and

WHEREAS, the project involves the construction of a non-motorized path along the ease side of Waverly Roadbetween Starlight Lane and Cooley Drive, and acquisition of portions of six parcels to provide right-of-way for thispath; and

WHEREAS, the applicant has met with property owners and residents along proposed pathway, and has coordinatedwith affected agencies, including the Board of Water and Light, Consumers Energy, AT&T, fiber optic providers,Parks & Recreation-Forestry, Public Service-Operations & Maintenance, and CATA; and

WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011, the Planning Board reviewed the location, character, and extent of the proposal inaccordance with its Act 33 Review procedures and found that:

• bicycle travel along Waverly Road is currently close to impossible due to the high volume of vehiculartraffic,

• the project is consistent with the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission "Regional Long RangeTransportation Plan 2035" and Lansing's Complete Streets Ordinance,

• The project provide bicycle transportation opportunities to southwest Lansing, including the propertiesalong the corridor,

• The essential character of the neighborhood will be unchanged, and the proposed acquisitions arenecessary and appropriate to complete the project; and

WHEREAS, the Board voted unanimously (4-0) to recommend approval of Act-2-11, to acquire portions of sixparcels and to construct a non-motorized path along the east side of Waverly Road between Starlight Lane andCooley Drive; and

WHEREAS, the Committee on Development and Planning has reviewed the report and recommendation of thePlanning Board and concurs therewith;

WHEREAS, all property values were based on based on the land values contained in the Assessor's records andconfirmed with the City Assessor; and

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lansing City Council hereby approves Act-2-11, Lansing 2011CMAQ Waverly Road Pathway, and to acquire portions of six parcels, legally described as:

Portion of 2505 S. Waverly Road (33-01-01-30-151-001)Beginning at the northwest corner of the parcel, then east 9.0', south 104.95', west 9.0' and north 104.95'to the point of beg inning, an area of approximately 945 square feet, in the amount of $6180.00,

Portion of 2515 S. Waverly Road (33-01-01-30-151-011)Beginning at the northwest corner of the parcel then east 17.0', south 148.5', west 17.0' and north 148.5' tothe point of beginning, an area of approximately 2525 square feet, in the amount of $3700.00,

Portion of 2615 S. Waverly Road (33-01-01-30-153-021)Beginning at the northwest corner of the parcel then east 6.0', south 165.0', west 6.0' and north 165.0' tothe point of beginning, an area of approximately 990 square feet, in the amount of $1,200.00,

Portion of 3017 S. Waverly Road (33-01-01-30-303-031)Beginning at the northwest corner of the parcel then east 22.0', south 15.0', west 20.0', south 172.0', west12.0' and north 187.0' to the point of beginning, an area of approximately 2544 square feet, in the amountof $6,100.00,

Portion of 3101 S. Waverly Road (33-01-01-30-351-001)Beginning at the northwest corner of the parcel then east 6.0', south 120.0', west 6.0' and north 120.0' tothe point of beginning, an area of approximately 720 square feet, in the amount of $1,275.00,

Portion of 3301 S. Waverly Road (33-01-01-30-351-081)Beginning at the northwest corner of the parcel then east 6.0', south 165.0', west 6.0' and north 165.0' tothe point of beginning, an area of approximately 990 square feet, in the amount of $2,400.00.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor, on behalf of the City, is hereby authorized to sign and execute alldocuments necessary to effectuate the aforementioned transaction(s), subject to their prior approval as to content andform by the City Attorney, and take all steps necessary to complete the project.

RESOLUTION #BY THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING

RE:

Act-5-10, Conveyance of Easement on LBWL Riverfront Property (PPN 33-01-01-23-126-070) to AT&T

WHEREAS, the Lansing Board of Water and Light requests that the City convey an easement toAT&T for existing and future communication facilities on LBWL property; and

WHEREAS, the property is located on the Red Cedar River, north of Crego Park and south ofthe 1-496 ramp to US 127, and is bisected by a CSX railroad ROW; and

WHEREAS, the Rivertrail is located on the north shore of the Red Cedar, on the south edge ofthe parcel; and

WHEREAS, the requested easement is "L"-shaped, running in a N-S direction with the FrancisStreet ROW (extended), and jutting southeasterly to the Red Cedar River, all north of the CSXROW; and

WHEREAS, the easement contains language that protects a well located on the property, andhas been revised to address early concerns about protecting the Rivertrail; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the location, character, and extent of the proposedeasement in accordance with its Act 285 Review procedures, and found that:

1. the requested easement is necessary and appropriate for continuation, service, andpossible expansion of AT&T service to the Lansing area,

2. the proposed easement will not interfere with the LBWL use of the property or theRivertrail,

3. the easement language protects the City from damage to its water supply and theRivertrail; and

WHEREAS, the Lansing Planning Board, at its meeting on May 3, 2011, voted unanimously(5-0) to recommend approval of Act-5-10, the request by the Board of Water and Light to grantAT&T an overhead utility easement;

WHEREAS, the Committee on Development and Planning has reviewed the report andrecommendation of the Planning Board and concurs therewith; and

WHEREAS, the proposed conveyance provides that the property is currently used for the RiverWalk and kept open for public park purposes, that AT&T shall take no action which wouldobstruct the public park use of the property, specifically including ingress and egress, that nocell towers will be build on the easement area, and that the grantor must give prior approval totrim or remove trees, vegetation, or landscaping.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council hereby approves Act-5-10, and authorizes the conveyance of an easement on Board of Water & Light property locatedon the Red Cedar River, north of Crego Park and south of the 1-496 ramp to US 127 (PPN 33-01-01-23-126-070) to AT&T for the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), said easement legally describedas:

Easement Area No. 1A one rod (16.5 foot) wide area centered on the following described overheadcommunications line: Beginning on the north line of the Property at a point that is 302feet, more or less, westerly of the N.E. corner of the Property; thence S 01 ° W 99.5 feet,more or less, to a utility pole (Point A); thence continuing S 01 ° W 75.5 feet, more orless, to a utility pole; thence S 66°40' E 39 feet, more or less, to a utility pole (Point B);thence S 74°50' E 157 feet, more or less, to the S.E. side of the Property (also being atthe N.W. edge of the Red Cedar River)..

Easement Area No. 2A one rod (16.5 foot) wide area centered on the following described overheadcommunications line: Beginning at Point A (a utility pole) described above; thence S20°45' E 97 feet, more or less, to Point B (a utility pole) described above.

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the administration, on behalf of the City, is hereby authorizedto sign and execute all documents to complete these transactions, subject to prior approval asto form by the City Attorney.

BY THE COMMITTEE OF DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNINGRESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING

SLU-2-20111122 W. Holmes Road, Suite 3Church in the "F" Commercial District

WHEREAS, the applicant, Esteban R. Chavez, has requested a Special Land Use permit (SLU-2-2011) to establish a church in the building at 1122 W. Holmes Road, Suite 3 (Logan ShoppingCenter); and

WHEREAS, the property is zoned "F" Commercial District, where churches are permittedsubject to obtaining a special land use permit; and

WHEREAS, a review was completed by staff evaluating the character, location and impact thisproposal would have on the surrounding area and the impact on the environment, utilities,services and compliance with the Zoning Code and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Board held a public hearing on May 3, 2011, at which the applicantspoke in favor of the request and no other comments were received; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Board (based upon testimony, evidence and the staff report) at itsMay 3, 2011 meeting, voted (5-0) to recommend approval of SLU-2-2011 to permit a church at1122 W. Holmes Road, Suite 3; and

WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing regarding SLU-2-2011 on July 7, 2011; and

WHEREAS, the Committee on Development and Planning has reviewed the report andrecommendation of the Planning Board and concurs therewith; and

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council hereby approves SLU-2-2011 to establish a church at 1122 W. Holmes Road, Suite 3, with the condition that theapplicant agrees, in writing, that it will not object to the issuance of liquor licenses on or within500 feet of the property on which the church is located.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Special Land Use permit shall remain in effect only solong as the petitioner fully complies with this resolution, and if the petitioner fails to comply, theSpecial Land Use permit may be terminated by City Council Resolution.

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that in granting this request, the City Council determines thefollowing:

1.

The proposed church is compatible with the essential character of thesurrounding area, as designed.

2.

The proposed church will not change the essential character of the surroundingarea.

3.

The proposed church will not interfere with the general enjoyment of adjacentproperties.

4.

The proposed church will not impact adjacent properties as it will not bedetrimental to the use or character of the property under consideration.

5.

The proposed church will not impact the health, safety and welfare of persons orproperty in the surrounding area.

6.

The proposed church can be adequately served by essential public facilities andservices.

7.

The proposed church will not place any demands on public services and facilitiesin excess of current capacities.

8.

The proposed church is consistent with the intent and purposes of the ZoningCode and the Southwest Area Comprehensive plan.

9.

The proposed church will comply with the requirements of the "F" CommercialDistrict.

DRAFTBY THE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL SERVICES

RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING

WHEREAS, the Mayor made the appointment of Edwina Marshall as a First WardMember of Human Relations and Community Service to Expire June 30, 2013

WHEREAS, the Committee on General Services met on July 18, 2011 and tookaffirmative action;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council, hereby confirmsthe appointment of Edwina Marshall as a First Ward Member of Human Relations andCommunity Service to Expire June 30, 2013

DRAFT

THIS ITEM

NOT AVAILABLE

AT THE TIME OF PRINT

BY THE COMMITTEE ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONSRESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING

WHEREAS, the Mayor made the appointment of Anthony McCloud of 3708 GlasgowDrive, Lansing, MI 48911to the Third Ward Position on the Board of Water and LightBoard of Commissioners for a term to Expire June 30, 2015; and

WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Relations Committee met on July 25, 2011 and tookaffirmative action;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council, hereby confirmsthe appointment of Anthony McCloud of 3708 Glasgow Drive, Lansing, MI 48911 to theThird Ward Position on the Board of Water and Light Board of Commissioners for aterm to Expire June 30, 2015.

D AFT

BY THE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANSRESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING

WHEREAS, the City of Lansing is named as defendant in a workers' compensationaction, 2011768MLM10, involving alleged work related injuries/illnesses;

WHEREAS, it is proposed that the action be resolved by virtue of entering into asettlement agreement, in which, the City of Lansing would agree to pay Plaintiff the sumof One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) in exchange for a completeredemption and release of the City from any past, present, and future liability regardingany alleged injuries/illnesses whatsoever;

WHEREAS, the proposed settlement is recommended by the Mayor, the Department ofHuman Resources, the City of Lansing's Fund Administrator, and the City Attorney;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council hereby approvespayment of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) pursuant to said proposedsettlement agreement as a full and final settlement of said action.

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Law Department is authorized to prepare andexecute the requisite documents to complete settlement of the aforementioned lawsuit.

THIS ITEM

NOT AVAILABLE


Es4R FT

INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE

Council Member Jeffries, Chair of the Committee on Development and Planningintroduced:

An ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, providing for the rezoning of aparcel of real property located in the City of Lansing, Michigan, and for therevision of the district maps adopted by Section 1246.02 of the Code ofOrdinances.

Property identified as: Z-1-2011, 601 N. Pennsylvania Avenue, rezoningfrom "DM-3" Residential district to "D-1" Professional Office district

The Ordinance is referred to the Committee on Development and Planning.

BY THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT & PLANNINGRESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING

Resolved by the City Council of the City of Lansing that a public hearing be set forMonday, August 22, 2011, at 7 p.m. in City Council Chambers, Tenth Floor, LansingCity Hall, 124 West Michigan Avenue, Lansing, Michigan, for the purpose of approvingand/or opposing the Ordinance for rezoning:

Z-1-2011, 601 N. Pennsylvania Avenue, rezoning from "DM-3" Residential districtto "D-1" Professional Office district

F

THIS ITEM

NOT AVAILABLE




An ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, providing for the rezoning of aparcel of real property located in the City of Lansing, Michigan, and for therevision of the district maps adopted by Section 1246.02 of the Code ofOrdinances.

Property identified as: Z-2-2011, Part of 2331 N. Larch Street, rezoningfrom "J" Parking District to "F" Commercial District

The Ordinance is referred to the Committee on Development and Planning.

BY THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT & PLANNINGRESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING

Resolved by the City Council of the City of Lansing that a public hearing be set forMonday, August 22, 2011, at 7 p.m. in City Council Chambers, Tenth Floor, LansingCity Hall, 124 West Michigan Avenue, Lansing, Michigan, for the purpose of approvingand/or opposing the Ordinance for rezoning:

Z-2-2011, Part of 2331 N. Larch Street, rezoning from "J" Parking District to "F"Commercial District

THIS ITEM

NOT AVAILABLE


Sri c



An Ordinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of theCity of Lansing located in Ingham County, and to designate regulated flood hazardareas under the provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of thePublic Acts of 1972 as amended

The Ordinance is referred to the Committee on Development and Planning

RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARINGBy Council Member Jeffries

RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LANSING, that a public hearing be setfor Monday, August 8, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 10th FloorLansing City Hall, 124 W. Michigan Ave., Lansing, MI for the purpose of considering anOrdinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the City ofLansing located in Ingham County, and to designate regulated flood hazard areas underthe provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of1972 as amended.


cswope

cswope

ORDINANCE ADDRESSING FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROVISIONSOF THE STATE CONSTRUCTION CODE

City of Lansing, Ingham County, MI

Ordinance number

An Ordinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the

City of Lansing located in Ingham County, and to designate regulated flood hazard areas under

the provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1972, as

amended.

The City of Lansing ordains:

Section 1. AGENCY DESIGNATED. Pursuant to the provisions of the state

construction code, in accordance with Section 8b(6) of Act 230, of the Public Acts of 1972, as

amended, the Building Official of the City of Lansing is hereby designated as the enforcing

agency to discharge the responsibility of the City of Lansing under Act 230, of the Public Acts of

1972, as amended, State of Michigan. The City of Lansing assumes responsibility for the

administration and enforcement of said Act through out the corporate limits of the community

adopting this ordinance.

Section 2. CODE APPENDIX ENFORCED. Pursuant to the provisions of the state


amended, Appendix G of the Michigan Building Code shall be enforced by the enforcing agency

within the City of Lansing.

Section 3. DESIGNATION OF REGULATED FLOOD PRONE HAZARD AREAS. The

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Entitled "Ingham

County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)" and dated 8/16/11 and the Flood Insurance Rate Map(s)

(FIRMS) panel number(s) of 26065C; 0013D, 0014D, 0018D, 0020D, 0108D, 0126D, 0127D,

0128D, 0129D, 0131D, 0132D, 0133D, 0134D, 0136D, 0137D, 0139D, 0141D, 0142D, 0143D,

0144D, 0151D, 0153D, 0154D, 0161D, 0162D, and 0170D dated 8/16/11 are adopted by

reference for the purposes of administration of the Michigan Construction Code, and declared to

cswope

be a part of Section 1612.3 of the Michigan Building Code, and to provide the content of the

"Flood Hazards" section of Table R301.2(1) of the Michigan Residential Code.

Section 4. REPEALS. All ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance

are hereby repealed.

Section 5. PUBLICATION. This ordinance shall be effective after legal publication and

in accordance with the provisions of the Act governing same.

Adopted this (Date) day of (Month),

(Year).

This ordinance duly adopted on (Date) at a regular meeting of the

(Name of Adopting Body) and will become effective

(Date).

Signed on (Date) by (Signature),

(Printed/Typed Name), Clerk of the

(County, City, Village, or Township) of

(Name of Unit of Government).

Attested on (Date) by (Signature),

(Printed/Typed Name)

Title: Chair, Mayor, Supervisor, or President of the



2 NFIP MI MOD ORD non-computer fill-in, UPDATED 4/5/2011

cswope

PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE

An. Ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to add Chapter 876 of the LansingCodified Ordinances establishing a procedure for recognition of a Service Organization,as described by MCL 432.103(k)(ii)

Is read a second time by its title. The Ordinance was reported from the Committee onGeneral Services and is on the order of immediate passage.

By Council Member Quinney

COUNCIL MEMBER

YEAS

NAYSDUNBAR

❑

❑

HEWITT

❑

❑

HOUGHTON

❑

❑

JEFFRIES

❑

❑

QUINNEY

❑

❑

ROBINSON

❑

❑

WOOD

❑

❑

YORKO

❑

❑

❑ ADOPTED

❑ FAILED

THIS ITEM

NOT AVAILABLE


Zit


An Ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to Amend Chapter 805 of the LansingCodified Ordinances by eliminating the requirement that each auction held in the city beseparately licensed


By Council Member Quinney

COUNCIL MEMBER

YEAS

NAYSDUNBAR

❑

❑

HEWITT

❑

❑

HOUGHTON

❑

❑

JEFFRIES

❑

❑

QUINNEY

❑

❑

ROBINSON

❑

❑

WOOD

❑

❑

YORKO

❑

❑

❑ ADOPTED

❑ FAILED

THIS ITEM

NOT AVAILABLE


ray


An Ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to Amend Chapter 1046 of the LansingCodified Ordinances by making changes approved by the Michigan Department ofEnvironmental Quality and required by Federal Law


By Council Member Yorko

COUNCIL MEMBER

YEAS

NAYSDUNBAR

❑

❑

HEWITT

❑

❑

HOUGHTON

❑

❑

JEFFRIES

❑

❑

QUINNEY

❑

❑

ROBINSON

❑

❑

WOOD

❑

❑

YORKO

❑

❑

❑ ADOPTED

❑ FAILED

THIS ITEM

NOT AVAILABLE


Chris SwopeLansing City Clerk

July 22, 2011

President Robinson and Members of the Lansing City Council10th Floor City HallLansing, MI 48933

Dear President Robinson and Council Members:

The Minutes from the Meetings of the following Boards and Authorities of the City ofLansing were placed on file in the City Clerk's Office and are attached for your informationand review.

BOARD NAME

DATE OF MEETING

Board of Public Service

June 9, 2011Employees' Retirement System Board of Trustees

June 23, 2011

If my staff or I can provide further assistance or information relative to the filing of theseminutes, please contact us at 483-4131.

CIs Swope, CIVICLansing City Clerk

Lansing City Clerk's OfficeNinth Floor, City Hall, 124 W. Michigan Ave., Lansing, MI 48933-1695

517-483-4131 ❑ 517-377-0068 FAXwww.lansingmi.gov/clerk ❑ [email protected]

REGULAR MEETING OFBOARD OF PUBLIC SERVICE

JUNE 9, 2011

PRESENT: Paul Baerman, Ron Bloomberg, Dale Copedge, Matt Flechter, James Marshall,Rory Neuner, and Alfreda Schmidt

ABSENT: Shirley Rodgers

STAFF:

Chad Gamble, and Dean Johnson

VISITORS: None

1) CALL TOORDER:

Chair Baerman called the meeting to order at 11:50 a.m., at the Lansing Public ServiceDepartment Wastewater Treatment Plant.a. Roll Callb. Excused Absences: Shirley Rodgers

2) CITIZENCOMMENTS: None

3) APPROVALOFBOARD MINUTES:

e

MAY 12, 2011

r*ti,.^. n'' tom]Mr. Bloomberg moved, Mr. Flechter seconded, MOTION CARRIED UNANMIOUSLIto approve the minutes submitted for May 12, 2011.

4) ACTION ITEMS:

r u

Mr. Bloomberg made a motion for a resolution thanking Dale Copedge for his thirteenplus years of service on the Public Service Board and express the Board's appreciationfor his experience, expertise, perspectives and contributions to the Board and to the Cityin that respect, Ms. Schmidt seconded, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

Mr. Copedge thanked everyone and stated it was a pleasure to serve.

Mr. Gamble also thanked Mr. Copedge for his continued service and his expertise.

5) COMMUNICATIONS: None

6) REPORT OF OFFICERS:

Engineering Section: A written report was distributed.

Mr. Marshall questioned flooded basements-impact, responsibility, etc. Mr. Johnsonanswered those questions.

Public Service Board

Page 2June 9, 2011

Mr. Marshall asked for clarification and additional information on parts of the report.Discussion followed.

7) DIRECTOR'S REPORT:

Mr. Gamble asked for the Board's opinion on the three options for the Residential pilotareas for the Single Stream Recycling collection via CART. He announced that aCommercial Pilot program will also be starting in the future.

The Board would like an update of the status of the CART program in relation with theSingle Stream Recycling. Mr. Gamble stated a tour of the construction site at Operationand Maintenance Division could be done at the same time. All agreed the Octobermeeting will be held at Operation and Maintenance/CART facility for a tour and update.

Mr. Gamble gave the Board a summary of the final draft of The City of Lansing 2012Wet Weather Control Plan. Discussion followed.

Mr. Gamble presented the construction plans for the new Transfer Station and CentralGarage at the Operation and Maintenance/CART facility on South Street. Discussionfollowed.

Mr. Gamble showed the Board the Master Plan for the City of Lansing called "DesignLansing" it is the first Master Plan that has been developed since fifty plus years.

12:51 p.m. Mr. Johnson left.

Mr. Gamble passed out the Naturalization Pilot to the Board. This is a resolution basedon the reduced schedules (furlough days), and budget to keep these areas mowed.Discussion followed.

Ms. Schmidt asked about the story in the Lansing State Journal today of the River Trailnear Elm Street just east of GM Factory that is destroyed. Mr. Gamble stated it is ParksMileage money that will repair the trail, which should start later this month.

Mr. Marshall question Pump Station life expectancy, and capacities. Mr. Gamble gaveinformation.

Mowing has been a real challenge this spring. Lansing received 6.8 inches of rain for themonth of May, and 14.98 inches so far this Spring, which is the largest amount inrecorded history.

1:15 p.m. Mr. Copedge left

8) OTHER BUSINESS:a. Topics for future meetings

i. Procedure for projects that qualify for multiple funding sourcesii. Local Street Improvementiii. Green Designiv. Wet Weather Project

Public Service Board

Page 3June 9, 2011

v. Sidewalksvi. Single Stream Recycling

9) PENDING ITEMS:

The meeting adjourned at 1:18 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,Janette Tate, Recording Secretary

OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OFTRUSTEES

CITY OF LANSINGEMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Regular Meeting June 23, 2011City Council Conference Room Thursday, 8:30 a.m.10th Floor, City HallLansing, MI

The Board met in regular session and was called to order at 8:58 a.m.

Present: Dedic, Kraus, Munroe, Parker, Robinson (9:15), Rose - 7Absent: Trustee Bernero, McCaffery, Singleton

Others: Karen E. Williams, Finance Department; Attorney Kenneth Lane, Clark Hill(representing the City Attorney's Office; John Jackson, Asset Consulting Group;Scott Rubin, Brian Holland, Artio Global Investments.

Secretary's Report. 0 new member(s), 0 reinstatement(s), 0 refund(s), 0transfers, 0 retired. Total active membership: 506. Total deferred: 54. Refundsmade since the last regular meeting amounted to $0.00. Retirement allowancespaid for the month of May, 2011 amounted to $1,659,621.09. Total retirementchecks printed for the ERS System: 840. 1 death(s), John C. Wabake, died5/22/2011, (Traffic - retired 1/5/1993), age 75, no beneficiary. Eligible domesticrelations orders received: 0. Domestic relations orders pending: 0. Eligibledomestic relations orders certified: 0.

It was moved by Trustee Parker and supported by Trustee Munroe to approve theOfficial minutes of the Employees Retirement System Regular Meeting of May 19, 2011.

Adopted by the following vote: 5 - 0

It was moved by Trustee Kraus and supported by Trustee Parker to approve the Officialminutes of the Joint Employees Retirement System and the Police and Fire RetirementSystem Boards meeting of May 19, 2011


r- r-,.,

mThere were no public comments for items on the agenda. (7,

N>N P1

P12 C D

C.t

Employees Retirement SystemRegular Meeting of June 23, 2011Page 2

It was moved by Trustee Munroe and supported by Trustee Parker to approve thefollowing Request for Regular Age and Service Retirement:

Murdock Jemerson (Parks - Executive Management), 11 years, 11 months, age60, effective June 14, 2011.

Adopted by the following vote: 5 - 0.

There were no requests for duty disability retirements.

Ms. Williams reported that the Retirement Office received the Medical Director's Reportfor Case #2011 -E0317 and the report was forwarded to the disability subcommittee forreview.

Trustee Kraus reported that the disability subcommittee reviewed Dr. Roth's report forCase #2011 - E0317 and recommends concurrence with the Medical Director'sevaluation to approve non-duty disability retirement.

It was moved by Trustee Rose and supported by Trustee Parker to concur with theMedical Director's report to approve the non-duty disability retirement of Case #2011 -E0317.

Adopted by the following vote: 5 - 0.

There were no Requests for Refunds of Accumulated Contributions.

It was moved by Trustee Rose and supported by Trustee Parker to excuse TrusteeMcCaffery from the Employees. Retirement System Meeting of June 23, 2011.


Mr. Scott Rubin and Mr. Brian Holland of Artio Global Management provided aperformance review of City of Lansing Retirement System investment. Mr. Rubinprovided an overview of the Firm, the Artio Global Team and account summary. Mr.Holland reviewed the Calendar Year Performance for 2010 and 2009, and the portfoliorisk characteristics. Mr. Brian Hollard provided an overview of the Artio Globalphilosophy, process and market strategy.

Trustee Robinson arrived to the meeting.

The Employees Retirement Board discussed with John Jackson, the Artio GlobalInvestment underperformance for 2008 - 2010 relative to its benchmarks. The Boarddiscussed replacing the Artio Global investment and asked John Jackson to providerecommendations to the investment subcommittee.

Employees Retirement SystemRegular Meeting of June 23, 2011Page 3

The Board moved to the Real Estate Investment Subcommittee Report. Trustee Rosereported that the subcommittee reviewed three potential replacements for ING Clarion.The committee received good presentations from JP Morgan and Prissa II and it washard decision between the two firms. Trustee Rose felt that Prissa II met their goalsbetter and were not weighted with a lot of industrial properties. Trustee Rose felt thatPrissa II had a better balance of properties within the east and west coast.

Trustee Parker also reported that he liked the Prissa II value-added approach. Thesubcommittee recommendation was to hire Prissa II.

John Jackson reviewed Prissa II entrance and exit strategy for investments. The Boardwill commit a certain dollar amount and then Prissa II will call for the capital whenneeded. Mr. Jackson also explained how Prissa II acquires properties for the portfolio.Mr. Jackson also explained the differences between JP Morgan, Prissa II and thecurrent manager, ING Clairon.

Asset Consulting Group has recommended 5% real estate investment. The currentinvestment is 1% with ING Clairon. John Jackson stated that the Board keep at 1%allocation to ING Clarion, and pull the money for capital calls from the overweightedassets in the portfolio.

It was moved by Trustee Rose and supported by Trustee Parker to hire Prissa II andpull the capital calls from the over weighted asset in the portfolio, then slow withdrawfrom ING Clarion.


John Jackson reviewed the replacement strategy for Artio Global. He reported thatAsset Consulting generally provided six possible investment managers for the Board tonarrow down to 2-3 finalists for interviews.

Attorney Ken Lane reviewed the Election Policy and the Board requested that thecurrent draft be revised with alternatives. Attorney Lane also reviewed the currentDisability Application Review Policy. Trustee Dedic suggested that the criteria shouldbe that a duty disability applicant should only be evaluated for the job in which he wasinjured. Attorney Lane stated that Trustee Dedic's suggestion would require anamendment to the Ordinance.

Attorney Lane provided a draft for the Frequently Asked Question Document for theEmployees Retirement System. The Board requested another month to review withcorrections made by the Retirement Office.

Employees Retirement SystemEmployees Retirement SystemRegular Meeting of June 23, 2011Page 4

Attorney Lane reported that the City of Lansing did not get the lead plaintiff position forthe litigation against China Integrated. Attorney Lane provided an update of theInvacare possible litigation. Milberg is waiting for a response to its letter outlining theconcerns regarding Invacare's product. Milberg has reported that lnvacare mayvoluntarily take care of the issue and they may not be a need for litigation.

Attorney Lane reviewed the Fraud Monitoring Policy. John Jackson also discussed thathe was checking with other firms to advise the Board regarding a dollar amount for thepolicy. Attorney Lane suggested a $50,000 dollar amount threshold in which the fraudmonitoring firms would not bring litigation issues to the Board. Attorney Lane discussedthe dollar amount with Milberg and Robbins, Gellar.

Attoirney Ken Lane provided a legislative update that summarized the pending MichiganHouse and Senate Bills and recently adopted Public Acts. He reviewed HB 4060 and4123. The HB 4156 would require public pension system boards to publish its annualreport, budget, and a listing of all expenditures on a website.

Trustee Rose and Trustee Robinson discussed costs to the retirement system keep aretirement website updated with the required information if passed by the Michiganlegislature.

Attorney Ken Lane also discussed HB 4223 and SB 7. Senate Bill 7 would create the"Publicly Funded Health Insurance Contribution Act" to require that all public employeespay a certain percentage of the overall cost of the health insurance. Attorney Lanestated that as the current bill is written, it does not apply to retirees.

Attorney Ken Lane reviewed the Public Act 38 of 2011 that amended the MichiganIncome Tax law to tax public pensions, depending the age of the taxpayer.

Trustee Dedic moved the ERS Ordinance Status and Board policies to pending until thenext meeting.

Karen Williams distributed the handbook updates to trustees and Attorney Ken Lanereviewed the updated table of contents.

Karen Williams updated the Board that she provided a demonstration on the RetirementCalculation worksheets for the State of Michigan group working on pension software.

Karen Williams distributed the Securities Lending and Board Expense Monthly report forMay.

John Jackson provided a review of the Investment Report for the month ending May 31,2011.

Attorney Ken Lane reported that EFI Actuaries has returned a signed original copy forthe contract for actuarial services.

It was moved by Trustee Rose and supported by Trustee Parker to adjourn the meeting.

Adopted by the following vote: 5 -0.

The meeting adjourned at 11:01 a.m.

Minutes approved onJerry Ambrose, SecretaryEmployees' Retirement System

Scott Dedic, ChairpersonEmployees' Retirement System

Virg Bernero, Mayor

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR9th Floor, City Hall

124 W. Michigan AvenueLansing, Michigan 48933-1694

(517) 483-4141 (voice)(517) 483-4479 (TDD)(517) 483-6066 (Fax)

TO:

City Council President A'Lynne Robinson and Council Members

FROM:

Mayor Virg Bernero

DATE:

July 21, 2011

RE:

Resolution-Authorizing Floodplain Development Management- Designatingan Enforcing Agency and Designating Regulated Flood Hazard Areas

The attached correspondence is forwarded for your review and appropriate action.

VB/rhAttachment

"Equal Opportunity Employer"

City of Lansing

Inter-DepartmentalMemorandum

To:

Virg Bemero, Mayor

From:

Susan Stachowiak, Zoning Administrator

Subject:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM - Floodplain Development Management

Date:

July 20, 2011

Please forward this resolution to City Council for placement on the Agenda.

If you have any questions, or need additional information, please give me a call.

Attachments

"Equal Opportunity Employer"



An Ordinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of theCity of Lansing located in Ingham County, State of Michigan, under Act 230, of thePublic Acts of 1972, as amended, and to designate regulated flood hazard areasunder the provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the PublicActs of 1972, as amended

The Ordinance is referred to the Committee on Development and Planning

RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARINGBy Council Member Jeffries

RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LANSING, that a public hearing be setfor Monday, August 8, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 10th FloorLansing City Hall, 124 W. Michigan Ave., Lansing, MI for the purpose of considering anOrdinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the City ofLansing located in Ingham County, State of Michigan, under Act 230, of the Public Actsof 1972, as amended, and to designate regulated flood hazard areas under theprovisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1972,as amended.


MICHIGAN COMMUNITY RESOLUTIONTO

MANAGEFLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT

FOR THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM

WHEREAS, the City of Lansing, in Ingham County, MI currently participates in theFederal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMAs) National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)by complying with the program's applicable statutory and regulatory requirements for thepurposes of significantly reducing flood hazards to persons, reducing property damage, andreducing public expenditures, and providing for the availability of flood insurance and federalfunds or loans within its community, and

WHEREAS, the NFIP requires that floodplain management regulations must be presentand enforced in participating communities, and utilize the following definitions which also applyfor the purposes of this resolution:

1. Flood or Flooding means:a. A general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry

land areas from: 1) the overflow of inland or tidal waters, 2) the unusual and rapidaccumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source, 3) mudflows, and

b. The collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water asa result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceedinganticipated cyclical levels or suddenly caused by an unusually high water level in anatural body of water, accompanied by a severe storm, or by an unanticipated force ofnature, such as flash flood or an abnormal tidal surge, or by some similarly unusualand unforeseeable event which results in flooding, as defined in paragraph (a)(1) ofthis definition.

2. Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM) means an official map of a community, as mayhave been issued by the FEMA, where the boundaries of the flood, mudslide (i.e.,mudflow) related erosion areas having special hazards have been designated as Zone A,M, and/or E.

3. Floodplain means any land area susceptible to being inundated by water from any source(see definition of flooding).

4. Floodplain management means the operation of an overall program of corrective andpreventive measures for reducing flood damage, including but not limited to emergencypreparedness plans, flood control works, and floodplain management regulations.

5. Floodplain management regulations means zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations,building codes, health regulations, special purpose ordinances (such as a floodplainordinance, grading ordinance and erosion control ordinance), and other applications ofpolice power that provide standards for the purpose of flood damage prevention andreduction.

6. Structure means a walled and roofed building that is principally above ground, gas orliquid storage facility, as well as a mobile home or manufactured unit.

WHEREAS, the Stille-Derossett-Hale Single State Construction Code Act", Act No. 230of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended (construction code act), along with its authorization ofthe state construction code composed of the Michigan Residential Code and the MichiganBuilding Code [and its Appendices (specifically Appendix G)] contains floodplain developmentand management regulations that comply with the FEMA NFIP minimum floodplainmanagement criteria for flood prone areas, as detailed in Title 44 of the Code of FederalRegulations (44 CFR), Section 60.3, and

WHEREAS, by the action dates of this document, the City of Lansing affirms theresponsibility to administer, apply, and enforce the provisions of the construction code act andthe state construction code, specifically the Michigan Residential Code and the MichiganBuilding Code, to all construction within its community boundaries, and

NOW THEREFORE, to maintain eligibility and continued participation in the NFIP,1. The City of Lansing directs its Building Official to administer, apply, and enforce the

floodplain management regulations as contained in the state construction code (includingAppendix G) and to be consistent with those regulations by:a. Obtaining, reviewing, and reasonably utilizing flood elevation data available from

federal, state, or other sources pending receipt of data from the FEMA to identify theflood hazard area and areas with potential flooding.

b. Ensuring that all permits necessary for development in floodplain areas have beenissued, including a floodplain permit, approval, or letter of no authority from theMichigan Department of Environmental Quality under the floodplain regulatoryprovisions of Part 31, "Water Resources Protection," of the Natural Resources andEnvironmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended.

c. Reviewing all permit applications to determine whether the proposed building siteswill be reasonably safe from flooding. Where it is determined that a proposedbuilding will be located in a flood hazard area or special flood hazard area, theconstruction code act enforcing agent shall implement the following applicable codesaccording to their terms:1. Floodplain management regulation portions and referenced codes and standards

of the current Michigan Residential Code.2. Floodplain management regulation portions and referenced codes and standards

of the current Michigan Building Code.3. Appendix G of the current Michigan Building Code.

d. Reviewing all proposed subdivisions to determine whether such proposals arereasonably safe from flooding and to ensure compliance with all applicable floodplainmanagement regulations.

e. Assisting in the delineation of flood hazard areas; providing information concerninguses and occupancy of the floodplain or flood-related erosion areas, maintainingfloodproofing and lowest floor construction records, cooperating with other officials,agencies, and persons for floodplain management.

f. Advising FEMA of any changes in community boundaries, including appropriatemaps.

g. Maintaining records of new structures and substantially improved structuresconcerning any certificates of floodproofing, lowest floor elevation, basements,floodproofing, and elevations to which structures have been floodproofed.

2. The City of Lansing assures the Federal Insurance Administrator (Administrator) that itintends to review, on an ongoing basis, all amended and revised FHBMs and FloodInsurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and related supporting data and revisions thereof andrevisions of 44 CFR, Part 60, Criteria for Land Management and Use, and to make suchrevisions in its floodplain management regulations as may be necessary to continue toparticipate in the program.

3. The City of Lansing further assures the Administrator that it will adopt the currenteffective FEMA Flood Insurance Study (FIS), FHBMs, and/or the FIRMs by referencewithin its Floodplain Management Map Adoption Ordinance or similarly bindingordinance documentation.

Community: Date Passed:

Officer Name: Title:

Signature: Date:

Witness Name: Title:

Signature:

Date:

ORDINANCE ADDRESSING FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROVISIONSOF THE STATE CONSTRUCTION CODE

City of Lansing, Ingham County, MI

Ordinance number

An Ordinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the

City of Lansing located in Ingham County, and to designate regulated flood hazard areas under

the provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1972, as

amended.

The City of Lansing ordains:

Section 1. AGENCY DESIGNATED. Pursuant to the provisions of the state


amended, the Building Official of the City of Lansing is hereby designated as the enforcing

agency to discharge the responsibility of the City of Lansing under Act 230, of the Public Acts of

1972, as amended, State of Michigan. The City of Lansing assumes responsibility for the

administration and enforcement of said Act through out the corporate limits of the community

adopting this ordinance.

Section 2. CODE APPENDIX ENFORCED. Pursuant to the provisions of the state


amended, Appendix G of the Michigan Building Code shall be enforced by the enforcing agency

within the City of Lansing.

Section 3. DESIGNATION OF REGULATED FLOOD PRONE HAZARD AREAS. The

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Entitled "Ingham

County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)" and dated 8/16/11 and the Flood Insurance Rate Map(s)

(FIRMS) panel number(s) of 26065C; 0013D, 0014D, 0018D, 0020D, 0108D, 0126D, 0127D,

0128D, 0129D, 0131D, 0132D, 0133D, 0134D, 0136D, 0137D, 0139D, 0141D, 0142D, 0143D,

0144D, 0151D, 0153D, 0154D, 0161D, 0162D, and 0170D dated 8/16/11 are adopted by

reference for the purposes of administration of the Michigan Construction Code, and declared to

be a part of Section 1612.3 of the Michigan Building Code, and to provide the content of the

"Flood Hazards" section of Table R301.2(1) of the Michigan Residential Code.

Section 4. REPEALS. All ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance

are hereby repealed.

Section 5. PUBLICATION. This ordinance shall be effective after legal publication and

in accordance with the provisions of the Act governing same.

Adopted this (Date) day of (Month),

(Year).

This ordinance duly adopted on (Date) at a regular meeting of the

(Name of Adopting Body) and will become effective

(Date).

Signed on (Date) by (Signature),

(Printed/Typed Name), Clerk of the



Attested on (Date) by (Signature),

(Printed/Typed Name)

Title: Chair, Mayor, Supervisor, or President of the



2 NFIP MI MOD ORD non-computer fill-in, UPDATED 4/5/2011

Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory AffairsMICHIGAN LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION (MLCC)

7150 Harris Drive, P.O. Box 30005Lansing, Michigan 48909-7505

LOCAL GOVERNMENT 15-DAY NOTICE[Authorized by R 436.1105 (2d) and (3)]

July 15, 2011

LANSING CITY COUNCILATTN: CLERK124 W MICHIGANLANSING, MI 48933-1694

Request ID #: 619632

The Michigan Liquor Control Commission has received an application from GOLDEN TEMPLE, INC.REQUESTS TRANSFER OWNERSHIP 2011 SDD & SDM LICENSED BUSINESS LOCATED AT 815 WEDGEWOOD, SUITE B, LANSING, MI 48912, INGHAM COUNTY FROM I & J, INC.

STOCKHOLDER:OPINDER KAUR 3010 NORTHPOINTE DR, APT C, JACKSON, MI 49201 H: 571-879-2322 B: 517-505-2796

Specially Designated Merchant (SDM) licenses permit the sale of beer and wine for consumption off thepremises only., Specially. Designated Distributor (SDD) licenses permit the sale of alcoholic liquor, other thanbeer and wine under 21 per cent alcohol by volume, for consumption off the premises only.

For your information, part of the investigation of the application is conducted by the local law enforcementagency and investigative forms will be released to them either in person or by mail.

Although local governing body approval is not required by the Michigan Liquor Control Code, Rules andRelated Laws for off-premise licenses, the local governing body, or its designee, may notify 'the Commission atthe above address within 15 days of receipt of this letter if the applicant location will not be in compliance withall appropriate state and local building, plumbing, zoning, fire, sanitation and health laws and ordinances, or ifthe applicant is considered ineligible due to other factors.

All conditions of non-compliance must be outlined in detail, indicating the applicable laws and ordinances. Acopy of the law and/or ordinance may be submitted with the notification.

If you have any questions, please contact Unit 3 of the Retail Licensing Division at (517) 636-0204een

LC-3104(Rev. 09/05)Authority: R436.1105(2d) and (3)Completion: MandatoryPenalty: No License

The Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age,national origin, color, marital status, disability, or political beliefs. If you need help with reading, writing, hearing, etc., under the Americanswith Disabilities Act, you may make your needs known to this agency.

TO:

Lansing City Council

FROM:

Mary Sabaj

^,^Ingham/Lansing Co

r4t9Oorrections . nager

DATE:

July 15, 2011

RE:

FY2011-2012 State Funding Application, MDOC Contractand Sub-contracts for Community Corrections Programs

Lansing City Council,

Each year the State Community Corrections grant funding application is approved by the InghamCounty Board of Commissioners and the Lansing City Council. I have attached the Resolutionas passed by the Board of Commissioners on June 28, 2011 and a copy of the Application. Inorder for the State Community Correction Advisory Board to approve the application, thedeadline for local approval is August 18, 2011. The Ingham/Lansing Community CorrectionsAdvisory Board respectfully requests City Council approval of the 2011-2012 Annual FundingApplication.

The MDOC-Office of Community Alternatives grant application and subsequent grant award will provideState funding for the following Community Corrections programs for State fiscal year 2011-2012:

Pathways Employment Program provided by Peckham, Inc.

$70,737Relapse Prevention & Recovery Program provided byC-E-I Community Mental Health

$47,200Holistic OUIL III Program Enhancements (HOPE) provideby C-E-I Community Mental Health

$46,347Cognitive Change Groups provided by National CouncilOn Alcoholism

$34,650Program Referral & Gatekeeper Services provided byCommunity Corrections staff

$12,500Day Reporting services provided by a vendor yet tobe determined

$43,350Community Corrections Advisory Board Administration $62,000

Program Total

$316,784

Additionally, Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Services to beprovided by CET- Community Mental Health - House ofCommons, National Council on Alcoholism - Glass Houseand Holden House and other out of county programs valued at: $495,670

Thank you for your consideration and action on this request.

1,3

c-.

rno-.

N)

ADOPTED-JUNE 28, 2011Agenda Item No. 18

Introduced by the Law Enforcement and Finance Committees of the:

INGHAM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION AND ENTERINGINTO A CONTRACT WITH THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FOR INGHAMCOUNTY/CITY OF LANSING COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS AND AUTHORIZING ENTERING

INTO SUBCONTRACTS FOR COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROGRAMS FOR FY 2011-2012

RESOLUTION #11-204

WHEREAS, the State Community Corrections Advisory Board, the Ingham County Board of Commissioners,and the City of Lansing approved the Ingham County/City of Lansing Community Corrections ComprehensivePlan; and

WHEREAS, the State Community Corrections Advisory Board, the Ingham County Board of Commissioners,and the City of Lansing approved the Application for State of Michigan Community Corrections Act Funds forFY 2011-2012; and

WHEREAS, the FY 2011-2012 Application provides for the continuation of the following CCAB Plans andServices programming and the Drunk Driving Jail Reduction and Community Treatment Program with aportion of Ingham County's allocation of State Community Corrections funds; Relapse Prevention andRecovery ($47,200) and House of Commons program enhancements (H.O.P.E.) ($46,427) to be provided byC.E.I. Community Mental Health, Employment Services ($70,737) to be provided by Peckham VocationalIndustries, Inc; Jail-Based Case Management services ($12,500) to be provided by CCAB staff; CognitiveChange Groups ($34,650) to be provided by National Council on Alcoholism, and for Day Reporting services($43,350) to be provided by a vendor yet to be determined; and

WHEREAS, the FY 2011-2012 grant award provides Ingham County with the use of residential beds (estimated28 per day) with M.D.O.C. contracting directly with residential providers rather than with local jurisdictions fora projected value of $495,670; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the FY 2011-2012 Application, residential services are to be provided by CommunityPrograms, Inc., Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services, Kalamazoo Probation Enhancement Program, Inc.,the Home of New Vision, National Council on Alcoholism, and C-E-I Community Mental Health - House ofCommons; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the FY 2011-2012 grant award, the County may enter into subcontracts for the purposeof implementing Plans and Services and DDJR/CTP programs and services identified in the CommunityCorrections Plan and Application; and

WHEREAS, the Subcontractors for Plans and Services and DDJR/CTP programming are willing and able toprovide the services that the County requires.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Ingham County Board of Commissioners authorizes entering intoan Agreement with the M.D.O.C. for Ingham County/City of Lansing Community Corrections for FY 2011-2012 for $285,437 in CCAB Plans and Services and administration funds, $31,347 in Drunk Driving JailReduction and Community Treatment Program funds for a total of $316,784 and for the use of an estimated 28

ADOPTED-JUNE 28, 2011Agenda Item No. 18

RESOLUTION #11-204

residential beds per day for a value amounting to $495,670 for the time period of October 1, 2011 throughSeptember 30, 2012.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Ingham County Board of Commissioners authorizes entering intosubcontracts for CCAB Plans and Services programming from October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012with National Council on Alcoholism for the actual cost of Cognitive Change groups not to exceed $34,650;with Peckham Vocational Industries, Inc. for the actual cost of employment services not to exceed $70,737; andwith C-E-I Community Mental Health for the actual cost of Relapse Prevention and Recovery services not toexceed $47,200.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a resolution to authorize the subcontract for Day Reporting services($43,350) will be presented to the Board of Commissioners once the vendor has been selected and approved bythe CCAB.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Ingham County Board of Commissioners authorizes entering into asubcontract for DDJRICTP and Plans and Services programming with C-E-I Community Mental Health forprogram enhancements (H.O.P.E.) at the House of Commons not to exceed $46,347.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that entering into the subcontracts is contingent upon entering into theAgreement with the State.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the subcontracts are contingent throughout the subcontract period on theavailability of grant funds from the State of Michigan for these purposes.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board Chairperson and County Clerk are authorized to sign anynecessary contracts/subcontracts consistent with this resolution subject to approval as to form by the CountyAttorney.

LAW ENFORCEMENT: Yeas: Celentino, Holman, De Leon, Copedge, Schafer, DragonettiNays: None Absent: None Approved 6/16/11

FINANCE: Yeas: Schor, Tsernoglou, Nolan, Bahar-Cook, McGrain, DouganNays: None

Absent: None

Approved 6/22/11

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

"Expecting Excellence Every Day"

Office of Community Alternatives

Community Corrections Plan and ApplicationFiscal Year 2012

CCAB Name: Ingham/Lansing

Application Type: Annual/Full

Email the application to:and,Send one copy of the application to:

MDOC-OCCCa?michigan.gov

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSOffice of Community AlternativesP.O. Box 30003Lansing, Michigan 48909

DUE DATE.: June 1, 2011

NOTE: CCABs in a multi-year contract will need to complete SECTION I (A, B, C) as well as the new BUDGET form andprogram descriptions for any proposed program changes.

Page 1 of 13

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION - 11

Name of CCAB:

"lick her Federal I.D. Number:

Fiscal Agent

1CC4BGhairperson

x_1-

Genera Contact information:Contact Person (manager)

Name: Mary Saba] Carol Koenig Judge Janelle LawlessTitle: CCAB Manager Commissioner 30th Circuit JudgeAddress: 121 E. Maple St., P08 319 P.O. Box 319 313 W. KalamazooCity: Mason Mason LansingState: MI MI MIZip: 48854 48854 48901Phone: 517-676-7232 517-676-7200 517-483-6436Fax: 517-676-7214 517-676-7264 517-483-6536Email: [email protected] Bc [email protected] CC [email protected]

Type of Community Corrections Board:

City/CountyCounties/Cities Participating in the CCAB:

Ingham County and City of LansingDate application was approved by the local CCAB:

May24, 2011Date application was approved by county board(s) of commissioners (and city council): June/July2011Date application was submitted to OCA:

June 1, 2011

B: CCAB MembershipRepresentirsg:

County Sheriff: Major Sam Davis

--

------

Name (and email if availableso [email protected] .

Chief of Police: Lt. James Kraus [email protected] Court Judge: Hon. Clinton Canady cc [email protected] Court Judge: Hon. Frank Deluca fdeluca^a ci.lansing.mi.usProbate Court Judge: Hon.. Janette Lawless cc [email protected] Commissioner(s): Carol Koenig be [email protected] Area: Rev. Charles Bicy [email protected] Prosecutor: Stuart Runnings f1! pa [email protected] Defense: Thomas Barger tbarger@4grewal. cornBusiness Community: Neal Johnson [email protected] Media: VacantCircuit/District Probation: Vacant (Circuit Probation Supervisor is in process of local appontment)General Public: Monica Jahner

[email protected]

Scott Schultz

[email protected] Councilperson: Derrick Quinney [email protected]

-When were your bylaws last updated (send copy)?

March 14, 1991 ^Does your CCAB have a "definition of a pattern of violence" that excludes offenders from any PA511 programming?Y ES (submit with your application documents)

Page 2 of 13

C: Summary-

fly summarize the key p oints of our Community Corrections Pln:(all'neld

permit carringe i ezur.ns)

,-.1. What programs, practices and policies contribute to a reduction of (or maintenance of low) prison commitment

rates: Click here to enter text.a. How do they contribute to reduced/maintained PCRs? Click here to enter text.b. Explain what data/measures show your PA511 funded programs have contributed to reductions in your

PCR:

Click here to enter text.2. What programs, practices and policies contribute to improved jail utilization? Click here to enter text.

a. How do they contribute to improved jail utilization?

Click here to enter text.b. Explain what data/measures show your PA511 funded programs have contributed to improvements in

your jail utilization:

Click here to enter text.

Page 3 of 13

A: INTRODUCTION AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR STRATEGIC PLAN:Strafegic Issues, Goals, and Priorities have been established' by the.Officeof Community Alternatives;in acco:raancewith` -Pubiic Act 511 and State Board priorities. CCABs will be required to establish-Objectives and Strategies based uponOMNI Felony Disposition,;JPIS, CCIS and local data that will supportState Goals and Priorities.

Strategic Issues are identified as Felony Dispositions Jail Utilization and Local Priorities,

OCA will provide the CCABs WithOMNIFelony.Disposition and .J PIS data. CCABs shall analyze this data alongwith localCCIS data (reports'run locally from Case Manager) and develop Key Objectives and supporting;Strategiesthot will leadtoward attainment of.Goals and Priorities established by the State Board and OCA, as well as local objectives andpriorities promoted in the comprehensive plan.

A thorough review of the data should include:m Overall PCRs, rates within sentencing guideline ranges, PCRs within Group 1 and Group 2 offense categories

status at time of`offense and technica',l probation violationPCRsReference. hanges in PCRs compared to prior yearsCti er c: n

s in your C .=+, C./area that influence change (n „ tocharacteristics, etc.)Review your past.OCA funding proposals for icees

'p olders, policies, merlin Trim s, offe

Example::ar the Strategic Issue of Felony nikpositiors, cn u usider the rt-.t- I Goal and Priority :s eun^^^ed on the^follow:ir^ pag

o

nd complete an analysis of your county's prison commitment r atei^lnta pry

^by DCA. ,E t blish oibjertI. as r ^^^cto prison commitment rates. For e, ample:

1. Reduce PV comrnitment rate from 32% to 252. Reduce Straddle rate to from 43%to 35%

Under each OBJECTIVE outline in I:!Ilet form those STRATEGIES(steh s ) ro be taken, including continuing, new an irevissl programs, or established and revised policies or prac i

-I

will support the attainment ofthe objecti.011E iihave specified. Identify if these are "new",

ontinuations or' rno iinications.'' Dr for sI ort term ('this fisc0abl

r

term implementation.

Keep in mind that all of the programs for wnich you are requesting;PAsil runding shoul:a be identified as strategies.Additionally, policies and !practices you propose (such as targeting specific populations or characteristics) are alsostrategies. Strategies may applylto more than one objective and shy ld bP m bea'ted under each objective as

appropriate.

or Example, the objective or " Reduce PV rate from 32% to 25%" may have the following strategies:1. Initiate structured sentencing with jail followed by RS followed by community Cognitive Behavioral Treatment

program that targets Level 2 and 3 probation violators. (New, FY 2012)2. Target PVs Level 2 and 3 PVsas priorities for'Residential Services. (Continuation)

The same strategies (with modirlcations) would be appropriate for the objective of reducing the PCRoffenders. Further OMNI data analysis may support an additional strategy of:

3. Target CJRP eligible straddle cells, especially those from Group 2 withoutincluding

of Straddle Cell

MDOCstatus for local sanctions'

Page 4 of13

i3. Felony Disposition analysis(NOTE

RegionalCLA sshoulqcomMete analysis=rur ea

1 count^^. Par r n tr ims are permitted in this sectionStrategic Issue: Felony DispositionsPublic Act 511 of 1933 stipulates that counties shall deeelopa conununity corrections comprehensive plan and pro ✓ idean explanation of how the count,' or counties prison commitment rat

till be reduced b, ciLerting non-violentoffenders ar,ci pros,

r ec rIL ism

eduction while public safety is maintained

The ^;ct i: intended to en:our a

e

n,particli,ation iri 0)01rnuniCt cooeel hint prepranis of ofender, 'one ..clue' lHL el

.ê sentenced to imprisonment in a statecorrectional facile', orj iii, s:ho

-Would not in^recce liê

;sl: to pubic safety, have not demonstrated a pattern of

lerit-behasior, and do not have a criminal record that indicates a pattern of violent offenses.

Goal: Reduce demand for prison resources and related auadetary requirementsPriority: Reduce prison commitment of offenders who can

and

f

ì

. iy sancrior,ed arid Treated In Piecommuni ty by fo llnwni ine, the principl e s of effective in,

colon (1

I

heed. respon_vl

anuresis forms tf'a' do sis for your ovecrl 'e m and s rated I_5.

Al'sec . connection between dote aoc,! i,'sis

oft!ectieesGnd proposed programmiriq (strotegies)`.mdy result in denial or (=de-Iona/ 0001'01/01 Of your ' roc.

L3 Usrngp OMN Felon

Drs ositron aa'ta supo red b

OCA fog CY 2.009 anal

2010:

_1.

Are felony dispositions increasing, decreasing, or stable?

Slight Increase - from 1,346 to 1,3612.

Describe changes within SGL categories.

Report rates and elaborate:Overall Prison Commitment Rate (PCR): 2009: 11.1%

2010: 15.5%

( State Avg. 20.5%)Straddle cell PRC: 2009: 12.9%

2010: 18.7% (Total Dispositions up 11.7%) (State Avg. 32.8%)(85.5% with PRV of 35 or greater)(42.6% parole or circuit court status at time of offense)

Straddle Cell Groupl: 2009:Straddle Cell Group 2: 2009:

16.1%

2010:10.9%

2010:11.9%17.5% (Total Dispositions up 19.4%)

Option A CIRP eligible PCR: 2009: 16.5%

2010: 20.2% (1 of 3 lowest PCRs in State) (State Avg. 37.4%)PV Technical PCR: 2009: 6.3%

2010: 4.5% (Total Dispostions up 4.2%) (State Avg. 19.4%)OUIL Ili:

2009: 8.2%

2010: 11.7% (11 Straddle, 1 Presump., Total Dispositions up 6.1%) (State Avg. 32.8%)(82% with PRV of 60 or higher) (90.9% agent recommended prison)(State Avg. 18.8%)

Overall, PCRs in all categories are very low even with slight increases in some categories. In categories whereslight increases occurred, there were also increases in the total number of dispsitions. The PCR for higherrange straddle cell offenders is one of the 3 lowest in. the State.

3. What, if any, significant changes are reflected in distribution of dispositions among SGL categories?significant increase occurred in the PCR

The most

4. Can you attribute any changes to strategies/programs in your comprehensive plan?1. PCRs remain low for alt PA511 program target populations - sentenced felony probation violators, straddlecells, and OUIL Ills

2. Jail Earned Early Release policies and electronic monitoring options for pretrial defendants, probationers,and eligible inmates who have served 50% of their sentences assist with managing the jail population andopen up beds for targeted straddle cell offenders (see CJRP eligible PCR.)

Page 5 of 13

3. CCAB Jail-based Case Management facilitates the timely transfer of inmates sentenced to residential fortreatment and frees up jail beds in order to retain targeted populations locally

5. Describe any changes in criminal justice system stakeholders that may have contributed to changes in rates:None

6. Describe any changes in felony populations or offender characteristic that warrant a change in your plan: Plantarget populations, objectives and strategies remain in line with felony population and jail utilization data.

7. Provide additional analysis you feel necessary to explain your prison commitment rates here:

Click here toenter text.

713-2: Key Objectives and Strategiesit NOTE:

hive objectives are not re ,ell ed; objecrl .'es adoa1d be measurable and i_ro^ Isle sufficient detail so Hearten canbe monitored.Each objective should he followed be at least one stratee, Isten

action

policy, program) that will help ^^on',eve your object' e

II uujectlaa; an i sL. ai

es mould be supported by the aria

a y^o^.l

,id above

If you did not pro

ale anal p si;

Cr

Or Grul_!p 2 pC)paletloil, vJO Wouldn t (J er i (3np an o.1l

e

ire i

- ^. ed tC tiler populationK?en In mind that all programs to v^J oLd

on al"e Ieci 1_sting fur P m am -onsldereci strategies

bL sure Locea I, dentify them as strategies

1.

Objective #1:

Maintain overall PCR between 11% and 15%Strategies in support of Objective #1 (number and separate strategies by using carriage return [enter)):1. Probation supervisory review of all prison recommended cases; modifying where appropriate to utilize collaboratecase management for those who can be safely and effectively diverted to a local sanction. (Continuation - Long Term)

2. Utilize structured sentences for targeted populations that include, as appropriate, reduced jail sentences followed byresidential placement followed by Day Reporting, Cognitive Change Groups, and OP/lOP Substance Abuse treatment andother services to facilitate successful community integration (Continuation - Long Term)

3. Continue all strategies and policies that effectively open local jail beds for felony offenders targeted for localretention, including the Sentinel electronic monitoring program, earned early release policies, in jail programming,utilization of PA511 programs in lieu of or in reduction ofjail time, pretrial pre-arraignment bond recommendations andcommunity supervision, implementation of Pretrial Risk Assessment Project, and CCAB Gatekeeper &Program ReferralServices (Continuation - Long Term)

2.

Objective #2:

Maintain straddle cell PCR between 17% and 19%Strategies in support of Objective #2:Target straddle cell offenders, with an emphasis on Group 2 offenses, as a priority population for structured sentencesthat include reduced jail sentences followed by residential followed by Day Reporting and Cognitive. Change Groups andother treatment and services to facilitate successful community integration.

3.

Objective #3:

Maintain technical probation violation PCR between 4% and 7%Strategies in support of Objective #3:Target felony Level 2 and 3 probation violators as a priority population for structured sentences that include reduced jailsentences followed by residential followed by Day Reporting and Cognitive Change Groups and other treatment andservices to facilitate successful community integration.

O-

Page 6 of 13

4.

Objective #4:

Maintain OUIL III PCR between 8% and 12%Strategies in support of Objective #4:Target OUIL 111 convicted offenders for reduce jail sentences followed by residential treatment, including PA511 HOPEprogram, stepping down to PA511 Relapse Prevention and Recovery prograrn

5.

Objective #5:

Click here to enter text.Strategies in support of Objective #5 :Click here to enter text.

o OMNI data to tract; changes in prison commitment rates that mere identified as objectives.Monitor arid report on changes in local circumstances or offender populations/character ostics that preventattainment of your objectives.

_Use CCIS data tc uetgrrmine the utilisation of your ping ramam.:

;our erg t o p,o ulationsWhat steps will you take if you find that you are not meeting your objectives or your strategies are not beingimplemented as planned? Community Corrections staff, the CCAB and Jail Utilization Coordinating Committee (JUCC)address jail utilization issues on an on-going basis. Objectives will be monitored by Community Corrections. In caseswhere objectives are not being met or if implementation issues arise, Community Corrections staff will work with theappropriate department(s), the CCAB and/or the JUCC to facilitate implementation and/or develop and implementstrategies to meet objectives.

Page 7 of 13

C:

Jail Utilization Analysis:(NOTE

Pe renal CC

Ls sir

uld

on ' pieit airal' ;-

For,

h ceunty,iCurrent Jail Utilization

County Ingham Click here toenter text.

Click here toenter text,



Click here toenter tent.

RDC (includingoffline beds) 665 Click here to

enter text.Click here to



enter text:Click here to

enter text.Utilization as% of RDC 97.2% Click here to





enter text.Operationalbeds #$ and ° is

ofRDC

60190.4%






1.

Does your county have a written county jail population management plan per PA 139 of 2007?

YES (describe ithere and submit a copy with your application)

2.

In CY 2010, did your sheriff initiate a reduction in population because the jail exceeded 95% of RDC for 5consecutive days per Public Act 140 of 2007?

NO

If YES, explain how this was carried out:

Click here to entertext.

3.

In CY 2010 how many times did the county declare an official (in writing) jail overcrowding state of emergency(over 100% of RDC for 7 consecutive days) per Public Act 140 of 2007?

04.

Does your jail submit JPIS data?

YES (comment on accuracy of JPIS reports)5.

What vendor or jail management software is used to report jail utilization?

Currently ID Networkstransitioning to Visionair Jail - target date Sept.., 2011

Strategic Issue: Jail UtilizationJail resources should be prioritized for _ise by'

: idus con. icted of crimes aiiut persons earl

r offender s :.hopresent a higher risk of recidivism or risir -o rice norslic

Local comprehensi^.^: community corrections plans should reducethe demand for rail beds by diverting non violent and lower-risk offenders, pi ornate reciairism reduction s^,hilemaintaining pub l ic ,-fet^,% and reduce jai

over

11 Goal:

Oner ate l

jail

or I^-

OT th

n capau

h tail reties: TIH oh,ta

Or TM'.county.

Priority:

Improve jail utilizatieni ano reduce need to beard inmates in other facilities: avoid releases unuer tn=emergency overcrowding act; maintain jail below the rated design capacity

C-1:

Using JPIS data (or local data as available} provide an analysis of local jail utilization including the average dailypopulations/lengths of stay of jail populations including felon and misdemeanant utilization, sentenced andunsentenced populations, partially sentenced populations, boarders, and offense categories.

(Regionals:

use carriagereturn [Enter] to separate information by jail)

1. This application uses

combination of data depending on the jail -JP'S & local jail data2. Are bookings up, down, or stable? Elaborate:

Overall, bookings are down (8.2%) from 9,176 in 2009 to8,422 in 2010

3. Describe changes in ADP or AvLOS for major population groups:

The felony population ADP has declined by15.7% (60.5 beds) while the overall ALOS has remained stable. The misdemeanor population ADP hasincreased by 12.6% (15.4 beds) with the overall ALOS also remaining stable.

4. Provide additional information to explain your jail utilization here including changes in stakeholders, lawenforcement priorities, bed closures, etc.:

Lansing Police Department (LPD) bookings through the LPDDetention Unit have been declining an average of 6.8% per year since 2006. LPD is the largest law

Page 8 of 13

en orcementf

agency in the County and, therefore , has the greatest impact on the local criminal justice system.

C 2:.Describe i l olicfes and, practices that influence jail population:1. Does the jail have a "bed allocation plan"?

NO2. Does the county have a "jail task force" in place to address jail utilization issues?

Y ES (describe) Jail UtilizationCoordinating Committee, Chaired by CCAB Manager, includes representatives from all local CJ agencies anddepartments.

3. How are sheriffs good time and trustee credits awarded/forfeited?

Sheriffs Good Time (GT) is 1 day for every6 served and eligible inmate workers get day for day eared early release (EER) credit. GT and EER credit isawarded up front; GT days may be deducted for misconduct. If an inmate worker is fired, credit is given forany EER days earned. Inmates may also earn EER credit of I day for every 2 in-jail program sessionsattended. Jail commitments may specify that an inmate is not eligible for any orfor certain types of EERcredit. Inmates may also be eligible to be released on GPS tether after 50% of their sentenced is served.

4. Is the jail "closed" to certain types of offenses/offenders/warrants?

NO5. Does the jail accept boarders from other counties?

NO

If YES, what is the daily rate charged for a boarder?Click here to enter text.

6. Does the jail have a county-imposed cap on local bed utilization to provide space for boarding?

YES

IfYES, report number of boarders and the % of the RDC for all boarders.

193 -29% of RDC7. Does the jail accept Parole Violators on M DOC detainers?

Y ES (what is the daily rate paid) $35.00 &$36/day8. Does the jail accept MDOC or Federal boarders under contract?

YES

If YES, what is the daily rate charged.for MDOC and/or Federal boarders?

MDOC: $36/day IDRP Federal: $59.17/day.

$30.00/day forImmigration

9. What was the revenue from boarders for CY 2010?

$2,474,27910. What was the revenue from County Jail Reimbursement in CY 2010?

$333,18111. Which CJRP "option" did the county select for FY 2011? Option A - $43.50 Straddle PRV 35+...

Which will thecounty select for FY 2012 if given an opportunity to change?

Option A - $43.50 Straddle PRV 35+...12. Does the jail operate a work release program (offenders leave the jail to work and then return to the jail)?

YESIf YES, how many beds (number and % of RDC) are work release beds? 4

How much are offenders chargedto be on work release?

$50/day (may be less on case-by-case basis)13. Does the jail accept weekend sentences? ' YES

If YES, approximately how many weekenders book in eachweekend? 12 includes those sentenced to consecutive weekends (9) and sobriety court PVs (3)

14. Provide additional analysis you feel is necessary to explain your jail utilization here:

JPIS data shows an overallaverage daily population (ADP) decline from . 690 in 2009 to 646.5 in 2010. Local data shows that in CY 2009,there were 240 overcrowded days, 55 early release occurrances with 2,058 inmates released early. In CY 2010,there were 66 overcrowded days (-72.5%), 8 release occurances (-85.4%), and 263 inmates released early(-87.2%.) So, far in CY 2011 overcrowding has not been an issue as there have been only 2 overcrowded daysand 0 early releases.

JPIS data shows an overall decline in the felony population of 22.9%.

The overall average length of stay(ALOS) remained stable. OMNI data shows an 11.7% increase (38) in straddle cell felony dispositions in FY2010; 37 of the 38 were Group 2 Offenses. Jail sentences increased for Straddle/Group 2 by 18. Of the 1,361total felony. dispositions in 2010, 84.4% are retained locally with 81.4% receiving some jail time.

JPIS data shows the following target population ADP reductions: 1.) unsentenced felons down by 12.9% from222.5 to 193.8 with the overall ALOS remaining about the satire; 2.) felony probation violators down by 28.7%from 73.8 to 52.6; and 3.) OUIL III down by 28.2% from 17 to 12.2 with a slight reduction in the overallaverage length of stay from 34.4 to 32.2 days. With 54-A and 55th District Sobriety Courts enrolling OUIL Illfelony cases, those receiving jail time are either not eligible for or are failures of the Sobriety Courts.

Page 9 of 13

JPIS data shows an increase of 12.6% in the misdemeanant population from 2009 to 2010. Local data showsthat the sentenced misdemeanor population increased from 33.7% of beds available for local use in 2009 to44.1% in 2010 with the ALOS remaining stable. The total number of inmates in this category have continuedto increase since 2008 (up by 36%.)

The felony pretrial population continues to be the largest population even with the noted decline.This FY , an additional Pretrial Services Investigator position was added to provide pre-arraignment bondrecommendations forfelony charged defendants in the Lansing, 54-A District Court Also added was directcommunity supervision for approx. 100 defendants. Continued enhancements of Pretrial Services will includeimplementation of the Pretrial Risk Assessment Project with Luminosity, Inc. this FY .

It is important to note that, due to the continued decline of County genera/ fund revenue, on January 1, 2011another jail post was closed, reducing local beds from 472 to 408 (64.) This post was closed completely and isnot being rented out at this point.

Additionally, by the end of CY 2011 federal funds that have been available to cover the cost of GPS electronicmonitoring (EM) for an ADP of 30-40 indigent defendants, probationers, and inmates released after serving50%. of their sentences will be exhausted. EM services will then revert back to a client pay basis for all grantfunded participants, unless additional grant funding is found. The impact of these two factors on the ADP willcontinue to be monitored to determine if current strategies need to be modified or new ones developed.

C 3: Key Objectives and StrategiesNOTE:

Flee obj ectives are not required; objectives should be measureshle an: pl e, Lae sufficient detail so prog[ ass :anbe monitoredEh H .) 1 n-use shoulcl be folle

o

at least one strafe

s

action

poi'

pmnshn that

' ill bel i

uEdd

\ our ohlettRe[ijutives and

should be

UiTO,-

i•

^i

si

1

in

i

f ,ou curl not infer tit}; tl^is LOSof misdemeanants in ,,our ailslosis

sou e.ouldn't de elnp an objec-i e e related to that poRefer to the most recent JPIS data ,or your local data/snapshot if you don t have JPIS)Keep in mind that all programs for which you are requesting funding are considered strategies

Be sire toclearly identify them as strategies.

1.

Objective #1:

Contra/ early releases due to overcrowding at 2010 levels or below.Strategies in support of Objective #1 (number and separate strategies by using carriage return):1. Pursuant to JPMP, release sentenced inmates scheduled for release within3 days; local ordinance violators,unsentenced inmates held on $10,000 bond or less; unsentenced and sentenced for child support who have served 50% oftheir sentence, and prior to counton day 7 of overcrowding sentenced inmates scheduled for release within 12 days.(Continuation - Long Term)

2. Continue Earned Early Release (EER) policies granting day for day EER for inmate workers and 1 EER day for every 2 in-jail program sessions (Continuation-Long Term)

3. Increase untilization of electronic monitoring inmates eligible to complete their sentences on EM (Continuation- LongTerm)

4. Target felony straddle cell offenders and probation violators for graduated sanctions that include residential and otherPage 10 of 13

PA511 programs in reduction of jail time (Continuation - Long Term)

5. Target higher range intermediate cell felony offenders for PA511 programs in lieu of or in reduction of jail time.(Continuation-Long Term)

6. Circuit probation supervisors to review of all fresh jail sentences to ensure that jail alternatives, imcluding residentialand other PA511 programs, are being recommended and to modify recommendations where appropriate (Continuation -Long Term)

7. Target pretrial defendants and sentenced misdemeanor probation violators for PA511 funded Day Reportingin lieu ofincarceration. (Continuation - Long Term.)

2.

Objective #2:

Reduce ADP of felony pre-sentenced population by 10% and ALOS by 10% in all JPIS categories.Strategies in support of Objective #2:1. Increase use of electronic monitoring and Day Reporting for pretrial defendants in lieu of incarceration (Continuation-Long Term)

2. Implement Luminosity, Inc. Pretrial Risk Assessment Project to provide objective standards for bond recommendations(New - Long Term)

3. Maintain Pretrial Services direct supervision optionin lieu of incarceration (Continuation-Long Term)

3.

Objective #3:

Reduce overall . ALOS for felony alcohol related cases to 30 days or lessStrategies in support of Objective #3:1. Target OUIL Ill intermediate straddle cell offenders for HOPE programs l & 11 in lieu of or in reduction of jail time(Continuation - Long Term

2. Divert eligible OUIL ill offenders to 54-A and 55th District Court - Sobriety Courts in lieu offal/ time (Continuation -Long Term)

3. Target OUIL Ill probation violators and straddle cell offenders for repeated residential treatment in lieu of or inreduction of jail time (Continuation - Long Term)

4.

Objective #4:

Click here to enter text.Strategies in support of Objective #4:Click here to enter text.

5.

Objective #5:

Click here to enter text.Strategies in support of Objective #5 :Click here to enter text.

What steps will you take if you find that you are not meeting your objectives or your strategies are not beingimplemented as planned? Community Corrections staff the CCAB and Jail Utilization Coordinating Committee(RUCC) address jail utilization issues on an on-going basis. Objectives will be monitored by Community Corrections. Incases where objectives are not being met or if implementation issues arise, Community Corrections staff will work

Page 11 of 13

Use JPIS data (or local snapshot if JPIS isn't available)to'track changes in jail utilization That .ere identified asobjectives.kloniLor and repore On changes in lo Cal Clrcb ,Larce or Cifender DJpU a5li^n CilararIstics that pi ey. enratLalnrnent o- yourobjectives.Use'CCIS-data to;determine the; utilization of your programs

to

with the appropriate department(s), the CCAB and/or the JUCC to facilitate implementation and/or develop andimplement strategies to meet objectives.

tlPage 12 of 13

Present any local priorities such as development of criminal justice coordinating councils, jail expansion/repair, publicieducation etc., which have not been identified in the abpve sections:

1. Continue CBT based education level program for male inmates conducted by Community Corrections. The programprovides inmates with the opportunity to earn early release credit for participation and eligible participants arelinked with Pathways Employment Program staff and other community resources before release.

2. Co-sponsor with Circuit and District Probation and Ingham County Parole, the 4th season of Women AchievingSuccess workshops forfemale probationers and parolees. Workshops are held every other month in lieu of a reportday. Participants attend 1-1/2 hour workshops on a variety of topics such as The Power of Our Choices, Women'sIssues Related to Addiction and Recovery, Empowerment. A Women's Community Resource Day to be held in theSouth Precinct gymnasium is also planned for October 2011.

3. Work will continue to develop and expand Community Re-Entry Planning for inmates leaving the jail. CommunityCorrections was not awarded th SAMSHA grant that was submitted in 2010. Consequently, other grant funding willbe pursued and options explored that use existing resources.

Page 13 of 13

Administration -

Administration is defined as those activities and related costs that have been incurred for the overallexecutive and administrative functions of the local office or other expenses of a general nature that donot relate solely to the operation of a specific program as defined/approved within the local plan. Theyare costs that by their nature are administrative in support of the overall duties and functions of thelocal OCA. This category must also include its allocable share of fringe benefits, costs, operation andmaintenance expenses, and if applicable, depreciation and interest costs.

NOTE: A SUPPLY has a life expectancy of less than a year (paper, toner, folders, urine testing supplies,etc.) while EQUIPMENT has a.life expectancy of more than a year (fax machine, PBT, leaf blower).

The form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text after a drop-downoption with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses areanticipated permit carriage. returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs.

r°.AF

a

T.v"3i6

fzV ?

„•{•* ^^

..w,.s.

F', `. <e W

utr^"

}

$ s' 9

+

^ .rt

eJ^

t2'B

r,4

6

a

S 9

a

Y O

D

1

0 _

.c....

^

-^_xe

a. Name and title of CCAB manager:

Mary Saba], CCAB Managerb. Name(s) and title(s) of clerical and/or administrative support staff:

Jill Bauer, Administrative Assistant to the Controller (as of June 27, 2011)c. Is there a request for funding of other administrative or support personnel such as IT,

human resources, etc.?

NO

If so, describe:

NAd. How frequently are CCAB meetings held?

Regular meetings are held on the 3rdTuesday of every other month, additional meetings are scheduled as needed:

e. Describe what is done to prepare/prepare board members for CCAB meetings and who(manager, clerical, etc.) does what:

The Agenda is prepared by the CCAB Manager toinclude action items that . need to be addressed, as well as discussion and updateitems. Advisory Board members may also requests items for discussion. Minutes areprepared by the CCAB Manager and attached for approval. Packets are prepared forCCAB members that includes the Agenda, a Summary Sheet of action items, anybackground materials for agenda items and data reports.

f. Do your CCAB meeting agenda include the following items (please remember to forwardagenda and meeting minutes to our office):

i.

Review of prison commitment rates/recent sentencing trends:

ii.

Jail utilization/state of crowding:

iii.

Program utilization in general and by targeted populations:

CI

iv.

Status of contractual conditions (if applicable):

v.

Status of contractual objectives:

vi.

Correspondence from Lansing Office of Community Alternatives:

Page 1 of 5

vii.

Expenditures and reimbursements to date:

■

viii.

What other items are typically on your meeting agenda?

The Agenda may notformally include all of the listed items above at each meeting. However,information is provided in report form that covers this information. If there issomething that needs to be addressed, the topic will be added as an agendaitem. Agenda items also will include discussion and information aboutprograms, program development, and other local strategies that areimplemented to address prison and jail utilization (e.g., Jail UtilizationCoordinating Committee and Electronic Monitoring Oversight Committeeactivites and reports, Pretrial Services and Jail Re-entry initiatives.)

g. Describe how expenditure reports are processed and forwarded to OCA in Lansing:Invoices are submitted to the CCAB Manager, CCAB Manager prepares a voucher thatis processed by County Financial Services. All invoices, vouchers and payments arehandled pursuant to County policy. Expenditure reports are prepared by theaccountant assigned to Community Corrections, the reports are provided to the CC4BManager for review and submission to OCA,

h. How often does the manager meet with, visit, and evaluate contracted programs?Quarterly Program Provider Meetings, Scheduled Program Evaluations, and as neededExplain:

Program evaluations are conducted and subsequently scheduled based onthe determined need to verify compliance with contractual requirments and/or verifyprogress toward addressing identified deficiencies. The CCAB Manager attends groupssessions and visits program sites annually. Regular communication occurs via phoneand e-mail to address questions, concerns, and other issues that arise.Answer the following two questions only if PA511 funds support the CCAB manager'ssalary:

i.

How many staff does the manager directly supervise? I - CCAB StaffConsultant

ii.

How much time is spent training, evaluating or disciplining staff?

The StaffConsultant has been in this position for 15 years. This staff person participatesin training as required (e.g. COMPAS and other MOCA and MACCAB sponsoredtraining)

j. How often does the manager meet with probation supervisors/officers?

CommunityCorrections works closely with Circuit Court Probation supervisors and agents, often ona daily basis.

Explain: CCAB Manager provides agent training at least once a year,and for all new staff and attends staff meetings as necessary. A Circuit CourtProbation Supervisor has always been a member and regular participant of the CCAB,Jail Utilization Coordinating Committee and Electronic Monitoring OversightCommittee. There is a tot of collaboration and communication.

k. How often does the manager meet with the prosecutor? Formal meetings as neededExplain:

Most often communication or work is done with the Deputy ProsecutingAttorney. Meetings are held with the Prosecuting Attorney as needed. An annualtraining is also provided for the prosecuting attorneys.

I. How often does the manager meet with judges? Formal meetings as needed Explain:Community Corrections has a good relationship with the Circuit and District Judges.

Page 2of5

On a regular basis, most communication and work is done wth the Circuit CourtDeputy Administrator. Judges will contact Community Corrections directly withspecific questions and concerns and Community Corrections staff will do the same.The Circuit Court Deputy Administrator is a member and regular participant of the Jail .Utilization Coordinating Committee and Electronic Monitoring Oversight Committee.There is a lot of collaboration and communication.

m.How often does the manager meet with the sheriff/jail staff?

As needed Explain:

TheJail Administrator has always been a member and regular participant of the CCAB, JailUtilization Coordinating Committee and Electronic Monitoring Oversight Committee.There is a lot of collaboration and communication.

n.. How often does the manager meet with financial support staff?

As needed Explain: ACounty Financial Services accountant is assigned to Community Corrections and issuesare addressed as needed. Most communication is through phone and e-mail.

o. How often are CCIS data reports run and reviewed for accuracy?

monthly Explain:With the new COMPAS Case Manager the process is to run reports monthly and crosscheck with invoices and program staff for accuracy. Considerable time is required toenter and quality control COOS programdata, ranging from 4- 6 hours per month.Ingham continues to enter residential program data to have access to more detailedinformation. The time required to enter data has increased since the COMPAS still isnot able to populate fields with OMNI data.

p. How much time is spent reviewing OMNI and jail data?

Jail data daily/OMNI at leastmonthly Explain:

Jail population trends are tracked through a variety of reports thatinclude Inmate Worker Earned Early Release, Jail Snap Shots, Bookings and BookingTrend Charts for all Courts, ADP, Overcrowding (release occurances, early releases,days overcrowded.) OMNI data is downloaded into the "OLD" CCAMIS desktop from adata file provided by Circuit Court Probation because is not yet available in COMPASCase Manager, OMNI data is used to prepare a monthly Circuit Court Dispositionreport that is reviewed and distributed. A variety of Community Corrections ResourceManagement Reports are distributed weekly/monthly to a network of local criminaljustice system stakeholders and elected officials.

q. How much time is estimated to be spent developing the plan and application?Preparation of the application document itself takes approx. 2-1/2 weeks. This doesnot include the time needed to review data. Changes and problems with applicationformatting, information required; etc. impact preparation time.

Describe when andhow the plan is developed:

Plan development is really an on-going process thatincludes monitoring OMNI and jail data along with current strategies andprogramming and making modifications where appropriate. Community Correctionsstaff begins thinking about the application process in March and programming isdiscussed at the March CCAB meeting. The CCAB Manager is responsible for preparingthe document and is assisted by the Staff Consultant who provides local data.

r. Describe the involvement of other stakeholders or subcommittees in data analysis orplan/program development. The CCAB Manager also Chairs the Jail UtilizationCoordinating Committee and Electronic Monitoring Oversight Committee which ishelpful to the Community Corrections planning and program development process.The data maintained by Community Corrections is often the catalyst far discussion and

Page 3 of 5

strategy development for the Community Corrections Plan and programs, as well asother initiatives such as Pretrial Services enhancements, electronic monitoring,automatied kiosk reporting, in jail programming, Earned Early Release policies, JailPopulation Management Plan development. Community Corrections has

s. How are utilization. and expenditures monitored?

Program utilization is monitoredreported weekly to judges and agents to increase awareness. Expenditures aremonitored on a monthly basis through voucher preparation and monthly expenditurereports.

t. What actions are taken when programs are under- or over-utilized?

The first course ofaction is to regularly report utilization systemwide so that all stakeholders are aware.This information is distributed on a weekly basis. Community Corrections works withprogram staff and Circuit Court Probation Supervisors to determine what factors arecontributing to utilization problems, as well as to develop a plan to address them.Program staff are encouraged to maintain communication and visibility with agents.Community Corrections ensures that information about program services and how toaccess services is thourough and use friendly. On occasion, the MDOC area managerhas been brought into the discussions.

u. Who develops the subcontracts for CPS funded services?

County Corporate Counsel inconjunction with the CCAB Manager.

v. Who calculates jail bed days saved and how much time is devoted to that task?

CCABManager, calculated mid-year and end of year pursuant to the formula developed foreach program.

w. What specific tasks are assigned to clerical support and what is the frequency andamount of time dedicated to those tasks? Orders supplies; inputs time sheet, a-mailsCCAB Agenda

if there is no clerical support, describe clerical tasks/frequency andtime demands if performed by the manager:

Community Corrections staff does allword processing, copying, filing, phone answering, and any other clerical tasks otherthan those listed in section w. above.

x. Does the county have procurement or purchasing policies for contractual services,supplies, and/or equipment?

Y es Describe:

Supplies and equipment must bepurchased from Vendors registered with the County; Computer equipment, software,etc. must be purchased through our MIS Department; contractual services areprocured through a Request for Proposal process that is controlled by the CountyPurchasing Department

y. Please describe the county's policies on travel expense reimbursement (mileage, mealallowance, etc.):

Ingham County has a 17 page Travel Policy. Generally, The amountto be reimbursed for mileage is determined by the IRS Standard Mileage Rate Method.Mileage is computed on the shortest route between the point of departure and thedestination, No meal allowance is allowed for travel completed the same day,otherwise supporting receipts must be provided and reimbursement made pursuant toIRS Meals and Incidental Expenses (M&IE).

z. Does your county have the facilities to host training (such as for cognitive programs orapplication training)?

YES

How many can your facilities comfortably accommodate?The largest conferene room can accommodate 60-65 classroom style and 70-75theater style

Would you be interested in hosting training?

Y ES

Page 4of5

aa. Does your county have a computer lab available for computer-based training? Y ESHow many can your computer lab comfortably accommodate? 1 teacher and 9students Would you be interested in hosting training? YES

Page 5 of 5

CCAB:

Ingham/LansingLocal Program Name:

Program Referral & Gatekeeper Services to

Service Provider: Community Corrections `s

o

^

o zoi

e>^CCIS Service Type: 125 - Gatekeeper

QO r a0

end^ 9# gTotal Projected Enrollment (for Gatekeeper):

165Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL3rds are projected? Click here to enter text.Projected Early Jail Releases (for JPM):

Click here to enter tent.Program Status (new, modification, continuation):

ContinuationIf a modification, describe here:

Click here to enter text.List projected enrollment/release by member county:


Gatekeeper and Jail Population Monitoring are necessary processes or FUNCTIONS ratherthan programs as we typically think of them.

GATEKEEPER -• Gatekeeping includes initial screening for program eligibility (not assessment) such as

determining if the offender meets established target and preliminary eligibility criteria (SGLs,crime group, PV status, number of priors, etc.) and the subsequent referral and enrollment inprogramming as appropriate.

• Gatekeepers will complete CCIS data entry for program enrollment and may need to maintainwaiting lists if programs are over utilized.

• In CCABs where there are no outside contracts (all services are delivered by managers or CCABstaff) a Gatekeeper program description may not be necessary. Determining eligibility andenrollment into the program can be done at the individual program level. Contact theprogram section manager or your grant coordinator with questions.

• Projections should be based on the total number of PA511 program referrals that will need tobe screened for eligibility, referred, and enrolled in Case Manager.

• Subsequent data entry such as termination/discharge from programming and calculating jailbed savings is a function under administration.

JAIL POPULATION MONITOR (JPM) -• Jail Population Monitoring is ONLY appropriate for jails with acute overcrowding where the

primary function is to expedite EARLY release of offenders to avoid overcrowdingemergencies.

• A JPM is NOT to simply facilitate the movement of offenders into already-ordered programs(this could be Gatekeeping) but to expedite releases to immediately reduce the ADP of thejail.

• JPM impact must be monitored so that local practices can be adjusted to AVOID theincarceration of those who are consistently released

• Projected enrollment should not be all offenders booked into the jail but the number that areprojected to be successfully moved out of the jail (not into jail-based programming).

• OCA supports the following:

G$

Page 1 of 5

o Counties seeking JPM funding should have a written jail population management planper Public Act 139 of 2007. The plan should reflect the use of the JPM to addressovercrowding.

o Funding should be limited to a period of years to permit local authorities to makepolicy changes to avoid jail crowding.

ANSWERAILQUESTIONS'USING NA IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRA:iThe form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text when a drop-downoption with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses areanticipated permit carriage returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs.

of

0e'O!!

retc : a

fo

KEE^PEgR l

4 il PaPA ATI s l

a. This service functions as a Gatekeeper for PA511 as well as non-PA511 programs.b. Are eligibility criteria for all PA511 funded programs established in Case Manager (or

through some local system if not using Case Manager)?

Explain:

Case Managerc. Are offenders referred for screening for a specific program or for any program for which

s/he may be eligible?

Explain:

specific programsd. List referral sources and how referrals are made for screening and enrollment:

Referrals are received from probation agents, jail command staff, injail program staff.e. How else are offenders identified for program screening/enrollment?

In addition to thereferral sources above, a list is generated from the jail data base that searches text fields for programs andCommunity Corrections monitors court notes received from Circuit Court. All of these sources are crossreferenced to ensure that every inmate is identified.

f. What proportion of program enrollment is via direct referrals rather than Gatekeeperinitiated placements?

100%g. Describe the steps taken to determine offender eligibility for a program:

For PA511programs, the Gatekeeper screens for eligibility through the referring agent alsomaking sure that referral documents are immediately forwarded to the program forreview, then eligibility is confirmed with program staff once referral documents arereceived. For non-PA511 programs, eligibility is confirmed with the appropriateagency. Eligibility is always confirmed prior to approval for transfer and prior to thescheduled outdate.

h. Do all offenders ultimately enrolled in PA511 programming have judicial ordersmandating participation? YES

Explain:

Click here to enter text.i. Estimate how long it takes to determine initial eligibility and complete Case

Manager/CCIS data entry for a new offender: 20-30 minutes

For an establishedoffender:

If the data is in Case Manager and it only necessary to add, then 10-15minutes. This includes the time required to make connections to screen for eligibility.

j. Do you meet with the offender to do the screening or work from referral documents?Explain:

Nok. What PA511 programs does this Gatekeeper screen/refer for?

Click here to enter text.I. Describe non-PA511 programs/services that offenders may be referred to:

MidSouthfunded substance abuse inpatient treatment, private pay inpatient treatment, therehave been some faith based residential programs as well.

lq

Page 2 of 5

m.

Describe the process of referring an eligible offender to PA511 programs (what do youdo) and how long it takes:

After an inmate and that inmate's agent is identified andthe inmate is determined to be eligible, a group e-mail is created that links thegatekeeper with the assigned probation agent, program staff, and jail command staffand sent as notification that the inmate is approved for a bed pending a lien check foroutstanding warrants and the identification of any other problems that would delaythe inmate from leaving on their scheduled out date.

At this point, the Gatekeeper acts as a coordinator and problem solver to address anyissues that arise (see section p. below.) When all issues have been resolved, theGatekeeper notifies all relevant parties that the inmate is ready to be transported tothe program. Jail staff notifies the Gatekeeper of the transport date which is thenprovided to everyone in. the e-mail link, including the referring agent. The time it takesto successfully see the process through to the. inmate's arrival at the program dependson the number and nature of the requirements and/or obstacles encountered. It canrange from an est.30 minutes, if no problems are encountered, up to several hours ormore over the course of days to problem solve with process participants.

An est.average that includes those inmates presenting issues to be resolved would be 50minutes for this part of the process.

The process. continues with the Gatekeeper following the resident through theprogram. The Gatekeeper is notified if the resident walks-away, as well as consultedif other problems arise that often might result in a return to jail. Upon discharge, thecase is closed in the Case Manger system. At minimum, this adds an additional 10minutes.

n. How is the referral source notified of offender enrollment or ineligibility?Immediately via phone or e-mail. In cases, where it is determined that an inmatedoes not meet eiligibility criteria for ordered programs or funding sources, work beginsimmediately to identify an alternative and work through the required process toenable release on the scheduled out date.

o. What proportion of your requested CPS budget is in this line item?

3.7% ($12,500)p. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of this service not specifically

identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this function:

The Gatekeeper function addresses in advance the many obstacles that can delay orstop a placement, (e.g. commitment language, pending charges, outstanding warrants,court events, completion of S/A assessments, medication needs, medical conditions andrequired tests, expediting agency decisions, funding agency and program policies, andtransport issues.)

The Gatekeeper also fields a variety of questions on a regular basisfrom agents, program and jail staff, and occasionally judges that are specific to theGatekeeper function.

Page 3 of 5

Many of the residential programs Ingham County has dealt with over the years say thatIngham has the best process for facilitating and expediting placements, as well asassisting with program planning because they are often advised months in advance ofthe actual placement.

The Gatekeeper also, provides constant monitoring of residential utilization and regularreports that are distributed o a network of judges, probation agents/officers, jail staff,program staff, so that adjustments can be made and problems addressed.

(Gatekeeper description is complete - Go to #3)^^alop^latn $ . o

or. , oEafe ,_. ,.

w3

a. Does the County where this service is requested have a writtenmanagement plan per Public Act 139 of 2007?

Choose an item.jail population

b. Identify the objective(s) from your felony and/or jail analysis (Partdesigned to address:

Click here to enter text.I) that this program is

c. Based on your objective(s), what is your target population? Click here to enter text.d. What is the rated design capacity of the jail (s) prior to any bed

enter text.closures?

Click here to

e. What is the current operational capacity of the jail (s) after bedenter text.

closures?

Click here to

f. List the average daily population as a % of the rated design capacitythis service is requested:

Click here to enter text.of each jail where

g. What data/information is used for targeting inmates for release?text.

Click here to enter

h. Describe circumstances under which you are called upon to recommendhere to enter text.

releases:

Click

i. Describe the process for identifying and recommending inmateslong that process takes:

Click here to enter text.for release and how

j. Is the judge/probation officer notified of offender release? Choose an item.k. Describe how inmate releases, recommended releases, and successful

documented:

Click here to enter text.movement

I. Do you track released inmates by characteristics such as crimestatus,. guideline range, etc.?

Choose an item.class, offense type, legal

m.How do you report offender movement to your CCAB and OCA?

Click here to entertext.

n. Is informationimmediate program

on offender releases used for future planning suchplacement for specific offenses/offenders?

as bypassing jail withChoose an item.

o. What proportionenter text,

of your requested CPS budget is in this program line?

Click here to

c o ntri

p. Review youridentified aboveenter text,

Ali

R.

GEbuti ons ()war

answers above. Summarize other aspects of thethat you feel are critical to understanding this

R 1' As

ate C'ee p£inganva:1V1a,r notniec"esta

service not specificallyfunction:

Click here to

y

roggran

sppeedifieh e below objectives may of

e obvious . Answer as appropriate beingb-`carefttz to

t ao bie ailcla °

in

he^^nQ 'D i

' su

c aunt

s saved

7PM o r G a t e AN

to progta n

Page 4 of 5

a.

Will this program reduce prison commitments?r

..A L,

YES1.

If YES, clearly describe how:

This program frees up jail beds for straddle celloffenders and level 2 and 3 probation violators targeted for local retention.

Will this program impact jail utilization:

YESi.

If YES, clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for thisprogram:

NAii.

Estimate how many jail bed days will be saved due to this program and describehow your estimate was calculated:

90%90 ALOS = 13,410 jail days saved

of 165 successful completion = 149 x

Ili.

If jail bed days saved can not be calculated,documented?

NAhow is impact of this service

Is this program intended to impact recidivism? NO

rr

frr,rN

. ,

w

5.

Ar

,L::

,

w ..,

i.

"

If

tPAW,graCyiPerforma

YES, describe how"

''

,In esi

. 11 ..:-

e n

°

and how it will be measured:

.a "%a

cpcators,at aDi

n (JR r LOS-cd

, ) d ^Cf

e m-arm

b

minimum:u

o

,

itut

,

NA

-'p

'the

P

epor

C.)')j

Pi

'n the

p

..t".,s^oP ,,ap

,)

bi

o q-,,,iPercett

_

_' C erDer

o

JPi.1D p Ile,

le to ,`ourr a

eroInler-PSrLCIS

that

-)ot'-)o

eou - r rehalonfli) ,

, n

)

,

ecFr

L.

F

X511 Eland

D:)

f

c n r o k.I.D Aia.Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design as you deemappropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary.

90% of those inmates eligible to be released to residential programs are transferred within 5 days orless of the "eligible to go" date

Page 5 of 5

CCAB:

Ingham/Lansing -

_a uLocal Program Name:

Pathways Employment ServicesService Provider:

Peckham, Inc.CCIS Service Type: 815 - Employment ServicesProjected Enrollment:

48Projected Length of Stay:

120Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Click here toenter text.Program Location (select all that apply): Jail:

■ Residential:

■ Community:Program Status (new, modification, continuation):


Click here to enter text.List projected enrollment by member county:


GROUP/CLASS DELIVERED PROGRAMMING -• This form is for program activities delivered primarily through a group or class-type structure.• When developing eligibility criteria think about what behavior or characteristic in addition to

addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address.• Use of individual sessions should be described when asked for.• New CCIS codes have been established to identify the specialized nature of some programs

and their populations.• Cognitive, Substance Abuse Treatment, Sex Offender Treatment, Employment, Life Skills, and

Domestic Violence programs are all programs that would use this form.• G00 is an option for "other" group-type programming not specifically identified here (discuss

with your coordinator first).• In the future cognitive programs may have separate CCIS codes based on a beginning,

intermediate or intensive program design.• It will be recommended that CCABs receive a memorandum of understanding from local

school districts, substance abuse coordinating councils, community mental health agencies,etc., clarifying what services are or are not available for your targeted populations under theirexisting funding and why/why not PA511 funds are required for these services.

IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM.The form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text when a drop-downoption with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses areanticipated permit carriage returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs.

Identify the objective(s) from your felony and/or jail analysis (Port I) that this program isdesiened to address:

Maintain PCRs in all target categories and control jail population and early releases due toovercrowding,

Based onyourobjective(s), what r§-your target po,pulatronPSentenced felons, fresh sentences an- d probation violations, with a priority on probation violators

ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING

Page 1 of 5

Describe tf elDrogramca.

Based on what your program is intended to address (treatment effects) within yourtargeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria?

Includerequirements for assessments and assessment results.Sentenced felons with a 0-9 or greater SGL score on a fresh sentence and probationviolators with a 0-6 or greater SGL score in lieu of or in reduction of a minimum of 30days in jail who are unemployed, under-employed or have an unstable work history.

b. Assessment (not screening) is the foundation of evidence-based practices. Referrals totreatment programs should be based upon assessed needs. Please describe yourassessment practices below:

i.

Is a risk and/or need assessment (includes substance abuse or mental healthassessment) required prior to referral or admission to this program?

NOii.

Who completes the assessment?

NAiii.

Does the substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level oftreatment per American Society of Addition Medicine (ASAM) criteria?

NAiv.

Is there a process to ensure that offenders receive the recommended level oftreatment per the assessment?

NAc. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence

recommendation?

YES

Are required assessments completed prior to therecommendation?

NAd. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program?

Probation agentsmay make a referral after obtaining an amended court order.

e. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process.Probation agents make referrals based on eligibility criteria, program staff verifieseligibility prior to enrollment, Community Corrections confirms eligibility through CCISreporting process. Maintain PCRs in all target categories and controljail populationand early releases due to overcrowding.

f. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility.Program staff communicates ineligibility to referring agent. Community Correctionswill notify program staff and referring agent in cases where eligibility is questioned inin the CCIS reporting process: If determined to be ineligible the participant isterminated,unless continued participation is authorized by the CCAB Manager.

g. How is CCIS data gathered/entered?

Monthly CCIS reports are submitted by programstaff and entered into Case Management program by Community Corrections staff

h. Describe the program design (programs using this description form should be deliveredprimarily through a group or class structure):

i.

Name of curriculum (if applicable and please spell out abbreviations.).

NAii.

Number of sessions per week per cohort (group):

Initially participants willparticipate in an Orientation and the Job Readiness, Job Search and Job .Retention classes. Participants may be required to retake any of the classes asdetermined by the Employment Specialist.

iii.

How many cohorts?

Participants will, at a minimum, participate in theOrientation, the 3 structured classes, 1 Job Club session per week untilemployment is obtained. Contact with the Employment Specialist will be

Page 2 of 5

maintained on a weekly basis, including visits to the job site whereappropriate, and will decrease as the participant demonstrates success inmaintaining employment over time.

iv.

Length of sessions:

Classes are 2 hours in lengthv.

Understanding that some participants may take longer to master skills thanothers, how many sessions, on average, are anticipated for programcompletion?

Length of stay is based on a period of stable employment up to180 days.

vi.

Identify what skills are taught in this program:

The importance of attendance,appropriate clothing, hygiene, dependable transportation, and appropriateattitude. How to successfully maintain a job by addressing work placebehavior, relationships with supervisors and co-workers and understandingwork place rules, including role playing on how to resolve specific work placesituations that may arise. Haw to address a criminal background with aprospective employer, create a strength based resume and complete anapplication using strength based principles, including practicing skills throughmock interviews and role play. Individual work will identify and addressunique barriers to getting and maintaining employment.

vii.

Identify if/how offenders transition between various phases or treatmentlocations (jail/residential/community) as applicable to your program:

Using asystem approach for programs and services, the Employment Specialist willalso present information through the in jail CBT program, establishing finkswith inmates prior to their release. Working with the . new Day Reportingprovider selected this FY , the Employment Specialist will provide workshops forDay Reporting participants.

viii.

Are individual sessions part of the program?

YESix.

If individual sessions are part of the program and billed separately, how manyindividual sessions are anticipated per participant? NA

x.

On what basis would individual sessions be used?

The Employment Specialistwill determine whether individual sessions are needed to address specificneeds. This will be determined by working with participants in the classes orat any point that individual guidance and support are warranted throughoutthe program.

Identify the training or credentials held by your service provider qualifying him/her toprovide this service:

The program's Employment Specialist has 12 years experienceproviding employment services for hard to place populations; 9 years with Peckham,Inc. working specifically with the felony offender population; holds Global CareerDeveloper Facilitator certification, was trained in Motivational Interviewing byElizabeth Fabiano, and has lob Development training.

j. How are delivered services (for billing purposes) and offender progress and participationdocumented by the service provider?

Invoices will include the names of allparticipants served in the billing period, types of classes and dates completed, datesfor all job club sessions attended, dates of all individual sessions attended.

k. How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral

Page 3 of 5

source? Include frequency ofreports provided such as intake,reports are provided to the participant'sand noncompliance immediately.

reporting positivemonthly, termination,

assigned

and negative progress and types ofetc.

Monthly written progressagent. Agent's are notified of intake

1.

Review your answers above. Summarizeidentified above that you feelan individualized program ableprobationers with significantstructure, the program is ableof employability barriers. Servicesobtain and maintain employment.provides job retention support,employee, as well as assisting

This FY the program is movingCourthouse in the same buildingthe Probation Depart. will enhanceservices, as well as communicationby Peckham to provide a classroomtechnology to facilitate class presentationsresume development.

pr 2gram mast eo tt u: IC= C,n , ofbeto,een th

u bjec rr. ,s end.str.egi2

other aspectsare critical to understanding

to provide intensivebarriers. However,to efficiently and

decline in intensityWhen employment

including actingwith job upgrades.

to a new office spacewith Cicuit Court

the referral processwith referringsetting and

and

Is

nllr

.i^^=`

JJi

of the program not specificallythis program:

Pathways isemployment services forfelony

through the class and Job Clubeffectively assist clients with a range

as participants successfullyhas been secured, the program

as a liason between employer and

in the Veterans MemorialProbation. The close proximity to

and accessabliity to programagents. The space will be furnished

will be equipped by Peckham withaccess to computers forjob search and

e S

Id

Irre

huulcj heidentified in Phrt 1 01

,o'_e flpp i i:ntion,

t'n7 r s n

ndeligibility

a.m totedaboveana :your response here

Will this program reduce prison commitments? YESi.


Pathways is used as part of a structuredsentence in conjunction with jail and/or other appropriate local programming totarget straddle cell offenders and level 2 at 3 probation violators for localretention.

The program is used in lieu of or in reduction of jail sentences toopen beds for offenders targeted for local retention.

b. Will this program impact jail utilization:

YESi.


Participants are sentenced to this program in lieu of or in reductionof a minimum of 30 days in jail.

ii.

Estimate how many jail bed days will be saved due to this program anddescribe how your estimate was calculated:

Projected days saved: 1,41065% successful completion of 72 total participants = 47; 47 participants x 30days saved = 1,410

c. Is this program intended to impact recidivism?

YESi.

If YES, describe how and how it will be measured:

Pobation violators are atarget population. Maintaining low PCRs and reducing jail utilization for thispopulation will reflect status toward achieving reduced recidivism. Newoffenses and probation violations will also be tracked for the duration ofprogram participation.

Page 4 of 5

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are requiredstatus of thefollowing Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum:

CoT recommends that 755, ofPA511 funded orogram enrokeesprima]

;birdatl uHii_ disco lr?^_ n e. ici Hint

1ppc!"5 ci or Ch i enask tl^c c1 nag In n CRs, Cc

ed

I:ragrit I. Till .`dill r iiect status rn\vard achievement of our obj

tl .'?Isl.Track li bed d'

saved I-apalinabl_ an `,UUI h ocram d

e .om this:prograrMs .

CUS S..on pop: i TIC0S l;l

Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as newlyacquired or improved skills, tests passed, pre/post test results, etc., as you deem appropriate.Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary.

1. 60% of participants will be competitively placed within 3 months of enrollment.

2. 50% of participants will retain employment for 3 months.

3, 80% will indicate overall satisfaction with program services resulting in axn average score of 4.5 onthe Consume Satisfaction Survey.

Page 5 of 5

CCAB:


Cognitive Change Groups tService Provider:

National Council on AlcoholismCCIS Service Type: C01 - Cognitive ProgrammingProjected Enrollment:



■ Residential:






addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address.• Use of individual sessions should be described when asked for.• New CCIS codes have been established to identify the specialized nature of some programs

and their populations.• Cognitive, Substance Abuse Treatment, Sex Offender Treatment, Employment, Life Skills, and

Domestic Violence programs are all programs that would use this form.• GOO is an option for "other" group-type programming not specifically identified here (discuss




ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRA_IVIThe form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text when a drop-downoption with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses areanticipated permit carriage returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs.

Identify the objective(s) from your felony..and/or jail analysis (Part I) that this prggirarn is

II

designed to address:Maintain PCRs in all target categories and control jail population and early releases due toovercrowding.

,u2 Basedon your objective(s), what is your targetr , o , elation ?Sentencedfelons, fresh sentences and probation violations, with a priority on straddle cell SGLs andlevel 2 and 3 probation violators

Pagel of 5

Describe the program:a. Based on what your program is intended to address (treatment effects) within your

targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Includerequirements for assessments and assessment results.Sentenced felons: fresh sentences with 0-9 or greater SGL score and probationviolators with 0-6 or greater SGL score in lieu of or in reduction of 90 days in jail. Notto include felony non-support convicted offenders.

Sentenced Misdemeanants: Probation Violator with 1 prior in lieu of or in reduction of30 days in jail, prior violation may not be for non-support conviction.

b. Assessment (not screening) is the foundation of evidence-based practices. Referrals totreatment programs should be based upon assessed needs. Please describe yourassessment practices below:

i.


NOii.


NAiii.

Does the substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level of.treatment per American Society of Addition Medicine (ASAM) criteria?

NAiv.

Is there a process to ensure that offenders receive the. recommended level oftreatment per the assessment?

NAc. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence

recommendation?

YES


NAd. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program?

Felony Probationers: Agent recommendation at Probation Violation HearingMisdemeanants: Referred by assigned District Court probation officer

e. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process.Probation agents make referrals based on eligibility criteria, program staff verifieseligibility prior to enrollment, Community Corrections confirms eligibility through CCISreporting process.

f. Describe your process for. addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility.Program staff communicates ineligibility to referring agent. Community Correctionswill notify program staff and referring agent in cases where eligibility is questioned inin the CCIS reporting process. If determined to be ineligible, the participant isterminated, unless continued participation is authorized by the CCAB Manager.


Monthly CCIS reports are submitted by programstaff and entered into Case Management program by Community Corrections staff


i.

Name of curriculum (if applicable and please spell out abbreviations).Thinking for a Change, also incorporates SAMSHA Anger Management

ii.

Number of sessions per week per cohort (group):

1 Intake, Introduction &Orientation, 2 group sessions per week for 10 weeks stepping down to 1 group

Page 2 of 5

session per week for 10 weeks, followed by an exit interviewiii. How many cohorts?

30iv. Length of sessions:

1.5 hoursv. Understanding that some participants may take longer to master skills than

others, how many sessions, on average, are anticipated for programcompletion?

32vi. Identify what skills are taught in this program:

Phase I: Intro/Orientation; SelfAwareness, Value Clarification, TimeManagement

Phase Il: Thoughts Influence Behavior, Anger Management -Control Plans,Paying Attention to Our Thinking, Recognizing thinking that leads to troubleand finding new thinking to replace it; the Agressions Cycle, Knowing yourfeelings, Cognitive Restructuring, Understanding the feelings of others andresponding appropriately

Phase Ill: Interperson Skill Building, Assertiveness - Conflict Resolution Model,Stop and Think, Problem Description, Goal Setting; Choices and Consequences,Choose, Plan. Do, Evaluate, Problem Orientation, Problem and Goal Definition,Generating Alternatives

vii. Identify if/how offenders transition between various phases or treatmentlocations (jail/residential/community) as applicable to your program:

viii. Are individual sessions part of the program?

NOix. If individual sessions are part of the program and billed separately, how many

individual sessions are anticipated per participant? NAx. On what basis would individual sessions be used?

NAIdentifyprovidegroup facilitation

the training or credentials held by your service provider qualifying him/her tothis service:

The group facilitator has an MSW with 2 years + experience withand has been trainined in the curriculum being provided.

j.

How aredocumentedparticipatingdocumentationeach sessionand alldocumented

delivered services (for billing purposes) and offender progress and participationby the service provider?

Invoices will include the names of eachprobationer with the date of each group session attended. Backup

includes sign-in sheets. The Individual Case Plan, progress notes forsigned by the group facilitator, discharge plan, monthly progress reports

communications with referring agents, and pre- and post tests are alland maintained in the client file .

k.

How issource?reportsreportsimmediately

offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referralInclude frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of

provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc.

Monthly written progressare provided to the participant's assigned agent. Agent's are notified

of intake, termination and noncompliance.ReviewidentifiedCouncilsubcontract

your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specificallyabove that you feel are critical to understanding this program:

Nationalon Alcoholism took over as the program vendor after termination of the

with the prior vendor. The process has been one of revitalizing the

Page 3 of 5

program and building relationships with the probation department. Referrals havenot yet met projected numbers, but have been gradually increasing as agents becomemore familiar with the program and the faciliator. In addition to group sessions,services include pre- and post testing, individual case plan, and discharge plan;am

^ P

-

r' â-

lip of the fol

.,ng r^^

acrd t i

Uou!d

c01 - 1

tea,..ecn th

ot^j

i

l

trait(

ins id-ntT e d in Pert! o:oîr en Dhcatôn

i,sui tar

ing andeli te noted above and your response here.

a.

Will this program reduce prison commitments?

YESi.


Cognitive Change programming is used as partof a structured sentence in conjunction with jail and/or other appropriate localprogramming to target straddle cell offenders and level 2 & 3 probationviolators for local retention.

The program is also used in lieu of or in reductionof jail sentences to open beds for offenders targeted for local retention.

b.


YESi.


Felony participants are sentenced to this program in lieu of or inreduction of jail time in lieu of a minimum of 90 days in jail or jail sentencesare reduced by a minimum of 90 days pending successful completion of theprogram. Misdemeanor participants are sentenced directly to the program inlieu of a minimum of 60 days of jail time or jail sentences are reduced by aminimum of 60 days pending successful completion of the program.

ii.

Estimate how many jail bed days will be saved due to this program anddescribe how your estimate was calculated:

Projected days saved: 2,88065% successful completion of 50 participants = 33; 10% or 3 participant x 60days saved = 180 days; 90% or 30 participants x 90 days saved = 2,700; 2,700+180=2,880

c.

Is this program intended to impact recidivism?

Y ESi.


This program targetsfelony probationer criminal thinking. Maintaining a low PCR and a reductionin jail utilization for this population will reflect status toward achieving areduction in the recidivism rate. Participant, new offense convictions andprobation violations will also be tracked for the duration of program.

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on thestatus of the following Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum:

0C -

ec nimens_

5

Ph511 ûndcd i

ogram eniol1Ees Jie from this prog am spriine,

erges population

Tn

:1^sc^âira yes ca_-nden ng and focuses on populations insuoeort of your oojectrvejsj.

11

r

To,

rDP are

r P0- hI _d upon ,,r cur ,)[cg[am ^hjcctI e per-in

e,:r

I.

Tr

-^:/ail

c^. ,

utu

i

_iP^ô^_i^

a,Ecti

(sl.Ti Jai jail bed days _a _. ed if applicable to your

i oel _.m de

ign.d.

T r aci- successful srid unsuccessful terminations from the program

li

Tr :c: the succc,aru

uri_uccossTul a ^cbarge 'from- probs11on -

programCGMIDIEtIOP5,

DI UreS6.

Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as newly

Page 4 of 5

3-1

=e1 = 1(

ln;l0, 4, di

F

acquired or improved skills, tests passed, pre/post test results, etc., as you deem appropriate.Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary.

1. 80% of program participants will demonstrate an understanding of improved understanding ofcognitive intervention concepts to be measured by a pre- and post test.

Page 5of5

CCAB: Ingham/Lansing

e

z;

,7 CFI-CA/1HC

xF"CCh['

ff

:

L' .

C.

mr nity°i orransInc

NationalCouncil onAlcoholihm

Home ol 1^'t :,Vi-'on

i;` PLr

12 1a 2 2

e A a

xn,

a'Piny Cc - Glick here to

rtelick here tr Click here to

text.Click hero to

I

Iter

-"-

=+[ Click here to Click here to Click here to Click here to

enter text. enter text. enter text. enter text.

here tcer text.

hEIeh text. CI^fLCI

LCT^L.

,a7ect^•

a

i. Click here to Click here to Click here to Click here to Click here toenter text. enter text. enter text. enter text. enter text.

VÎ do ickhcro to Click here to Click here toerne! t

Click here toer text

Click heretotex

r.cted ADP Click here toenter text.





:C€3.'â^'r_ÊiY2tL:.B'K^'^S,Y.^vY::§'.+""ir]t<93§"frT...lT..,.'7S9a"Sw7.c'4.'^Wyimx., s:2t'Z".L'i^:Jd.D

..-Aa,..°"•.. w.. .:'.:ttisS7.sx.x.a.5`X.'i..Rx5:5 LY.^G:..:.:_.rsta:{: :&.7...,fdlri:'.J.^ .S^° ::-:: ;fy^:.:^'riSJ^+a^Cik.^,ut;,,».k,^h ...:^.:.:_w 4'ei.¢J."a

Are offenders assessed for type of residential placement (substance abuse treatment v. half-way house

Page 1 of 2

prior to order/referral to the program?

Explain:

For substance abuse treatment programs,substance abuse assessments are conducted and must indicate the needfor inpatient/residentialtreatment pursuant to ASAM criteria.

Are referrals to residential processed by the local manager/staff or do probation officers make directreferrals to the program?

Explain:

All referrals are made through and approved by the CommunityCorrections Gatekeeper.Is residential enrollment captured in Case Manager?

YesDescribe any use of CPS funds in your plan to support non-core services at residential programs. Clearlydescribe at which RS vendor and type of non-core service:

CPS and DO.IR funds are used for theHolistic OUIL III Program Enhancements (HOPE) program at the CEI-CMH House of CommonsHow is non-core service enrollment captured in Case Manager?

CCIS information is forwarded toCommunity Corrections for input into Case ManagerDo you count bed days saved for participation in residential programs?

YESIf YES, clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for residential participation.However, jail sentences include a 90 day sentence reduction pending successful completion of theresidential program.

Page 2 of 2

CCAB:

Ingham/Lansing _Local Program Name:

Day ReportingService Provider:

being determined through RFP process this FYCCIS Service Type: D04 - Day ReportingProjected Enrollment: Sv tlProjected Length of Stay:

105Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO

If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Click here to entertext.Program Location (select all that apply): Jail:

■ Residential:

❑ Community:Program Status (new, modification, continuation):




SUPERVISION SERVICES -• • Supervision programs include Day Reporting, Electronic Monitoring, Intensive Supervision and

Pretrial Supervision.• It may be proposed that Day Reporting be eliminated as a program type since service typically

delivered under DR could be funded under Case Management or Intensive Supervision.• PA511 funds can not be used to provide Electronic Monitoring Services for MDOC

probationers unless it is for pretrial supervision of a probationer with a new charge (call yourgrant coordinator for exceptions).

• When developing eligibility criteria, think about what behavior or characteristic in addition toaddressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address.

• Supervision programs are not intended to simply provide access to substance abuse testingabsent other supervision activities.

• Costs associated with Substance Abuse Testing may be incurred as "supply" costs in thisprogram's budget if testing is part of the program design.

• OCA recommends that an objective pretrial assessment be used before defendants arereferred for pretrial supervision.

ANSWER ALL QUESTIONSUSING A" IF'NOT APPLICABLETO THIIS*ARTICULAR PROGRAM.The form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text when a drop-downoption with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses areanticipated permit carriage returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs.

Identify the objective(s) from your felony and/orjai•l analysis (Part I) that this program isdesigned to address:

Maintain PCRs in all target categories and control jail population and early releases due toovercrowding.

2 Based on your objective(s) 4what Islyourtarget population? Sentenced felons, fresh sentences and probation violations, with a priority on straddle cell SGLs andlevel 2 and 3 probation violators.

Page 1 of 5

k

3

escrlb'e' 'he programa. Is an assessment required to determine eligibility?

NOb. Based on what your program is intended to address within your targeted population,

what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria?

Be sure to include assessmentscores if applicable.Sentenced felons: fresh sentences with 0-9 or greater SGL score and probationviolators with 0-6 or greater SGL score in lieu of or in reduction of 90 days in jail. Notto include felony non-support convicted offenders.

Felony Pretrial Defendants: Referred in lieu of incarceration.

Sentenced Misdemeanants: Probation Violator with 1 prior in lieu of or in reduction of30 days in jail, prior violation may not be for non-support conviction.

Enrollment in Cognitive Change Program is also required for felony and misdemeanantparticipants.

c. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentencerecommendation?

YESd. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program?

Felony probationers: also by agent recommendation at Probation Violation hearingPretrial Defendants: referred by Circuit Court Pretrial ServicesMisdemeanants: Referred by assigned District Court probation officer

e. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process?Probation agents make referrals based on eligibility criteria, program staff verifieseligibility prior to enrollment, Community Corrections confirms eligibility through CCISreporting process.

f. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility.Program staff communicates ineligibility to referring agent. Community Correctionswill notify program staff and referring agent in cases where eligibility is questioned inin the CCIS reporting process. If determined to be ineligible, the participant isterminated, unless continued participation is authorized by the CCAB Manager.


CCIS data is gathered by program staff andforwarded to Community Corrections staff for quality control and COMPUS/CCAMISentry

h. Are offenders supervised through (select all that apply):Office Visits:

© EMS: ■

TX Reporting: ■

TX System (e.g. OffenderLink): U

Field Contacts: ■

Click here to enter text.Other (describe):I. If using electronic monitoring or other technology (including phone systems) answer and

clearly explain the following (use NA if not applicable to your program). NOTE: TheMDOC charges $6.50 per day for radio frequency or Sobrietor units with monitoring, or,$7.75 per day for both.

i.

What kind of equipment/system:

NAii.

Vendor for equipment/service:

NA

Page 2 of 5

iii.

Cost assessed by the vendor per unit/offender/day (clearly describe):

NAiv.

Is there a separate cost associated (by program and/or vendor) withinstallation/set-up? NA .

v.

Who does the equipment installation/retrieval?

NAvi.

Who sets up schedules and/or monitors compliance?

NAj. What is the frequency of reporting/contact with the offender?

Felons and Misdemeanants: Program report days will be coordinated with the *CognitiveChange Group sessions provided by National Council on Alcoholism.

Phase l:

3 report days per week for 5 weeks on days that participant is not attending aCognitive Change Group.

Phase II: 2 report days per week for 4 weeks on days that participant is not attending acognitive change group. Agents may reduce by one or add up to 2 days to rewardcompliance or to provide consequences for noncompliance with probation conditions.

Phase Ill: 1 report day per week for 6 weeks on a day that participant is not attending acognitive change group. Agents may add up to 2 days per week to provide consequencesfor noncompliance with probation conditions.

Pretrial Defendants: Reporting frequency will be determined by Court Order or PretrialServices Supervisor.

k. How is frequency of reporting/contact determined?For the felony and misdemeanants populations, reporting frequency is determined bythe program design. In Phase ll, the supervising agent may increase by 2 days ordecrease by one day the reporting frequency per week, In Phase

the supervisingAgent may add up to 2 days per week.

Pretrial Defendants: Frequency determined by Court Order or Pretrial ServicesSupervisorWhat happens during a typical "report" and how long is it estimated to take?

The program design requires participants to physically report at the appropriate frequency(see above) for a minimum of three hours per report session. .

A needs assessment is conducted and an individualized plan for success is developed withthe full involvement of the participant. Based on individual need, appropriate referrals aremade and also communicated to the assigned probation agent or Pretrial Servicessupervisor for non-program services (e.g., GED, substance abuse treatment, andemployment assistance, housing resources, etc.)

Based on individual need, appropriate referrals are made and communicated to theparticipant and to their assigned probation agent or Pretrial Services contact for non-program services (e.g., GED, substance abuse treatment, and employment assistance,housing resources, etc.)

During reports, progress relative to compliance. with probation requirements is discussedand progress on the particpant's plan for success is reviewed, updated and modified as

Page 3 ofS

appropriate.

Documentation verifying off-site activities is reviewed with the participant.On-site activites may include work on Cognitive Change Group and GED homework, fillingout job applications, participating in supervised on-site activities and workshops, andmapping out personal action steps to achieve plan goals. Through the RFP and vendorselection process the scope of on-site activities will be finalized and incorporated into theprogram subcontract.

m. Does the program design include collateral contacts with family, employer, school,treatment provider, etc.?

YES Approved off-site activities are randomly verified anddocumented (e.g. employment, school, support groups, treatment etc.)

n. Does the program assist offenders with securing identification and/or refer to additionalsocial or supportive services?

YESo. Does the program monitor for new criminal activity?

YES,p. This program

provides

drug/alcohol testing.q. Explain involvement in 'p' above including the.frequency/cost

Click here to enter text.of testing if provided:

r. How are delivered services (for billing purposes)documented by the service provider?

Invoices will include the name of each participantbilling period. Backup documentation maintainedsheets.

Client files maintained by the provider willreport dates, length of stay and activities per reportsupervisor, discharge plan, monthly progress reportsreferring agents.

and offender progress and participation

with each report date during theby the provider will include sign-ininclude documentation of intake,session signed by the attendingand all communications with

all

s. How is offender progress/participation reportedsource? Include frequency of reporting positive andreports provided such as intake, monthly, termination,

Monthly written progress reports are provided toAgent's are notified immediately of intake, termination

to the probation officer or referralnegative progress and types of

etc.

the participant's assigned agent.and noncompliance.

t. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspectsidentified above that you feel are critical to understanding

This program is intended to add another level of supervisionproviding guidance and support for successful re-entryhelp all participants succeed in the community. It providesproblems and address them before formal probationopportunity to encourage and reward compliance and

Reporting and on-site activities are structured so asschool attendance, other treatment activities, or complianceobligations.

-'Na

}fib" ..

3

r

,-. t

w^

-

-}. ^...ti pro

rcm neustrrsieet a.t feaet one,of th

,^,a,llo^ îr'g abrccex

of the program not specificallythis program:

and contact with a focus oninto the community from jail and to

an opportunity to identifyviolation is required, as well as an

progress.

not to interfere with employment,with other court ordered

-

â tF.

r,

-

-

aY»ar,a, ai d thrf. e sho' id Le CL

c,-

-- -

bet ,,''een the C61ea'EWes and sua_esn es identified in Perteî g1Hr noted aUo

e and your i

aose rye ervof g nus appl- icati_n

yoar La gating ar„N

Y ESa. Will this program reduce prison commitments?

Page 4 .of

VI)

i.


Day Reporting is used as part of a structuredsentence in conjunction with jail and/or other appropriate local programming totarget straddle cell offenders and level 2 & 3 probation violators for localretention.

The program is also used in lieu of or in reduction of jail sentences toopen beds for offenders targeted for local retention.

b.


YESi. If YES, clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for this

program:

Felony participants are sentenced to this program in lieu of or inreduction of jail time in lieu of a minimum of 90 days in jail or jail sentences arereduced by a minimum of 90 days pending successful completion of theprogram. Misdemeanor participants are sentenced directly to the program inlieu of a minimum of 60 days of jail time or jail sentences are reduced by aminimum of 60 days pending successful completion of the program.

ii. Estimate how many jail bed days will be saved due to this program anddescribe how your estimate was calculated:

Projected days saved: 2,85665% successful completion of 56 participants = 36; 15% or 8 participants x 42days saved (using JPIS ALOS presentenced status/sentenced after admission) =336 days; 85.% or 28 participants x 90 days saved = 2,520; 2,520 + 336 = 2,856

c.

Is this program intended to impact recidivism?

YESi.

If YES, describe how and how it will be measured: This program targetsfelons with straddle cell SGLs and probation violators.and reductions in jail utilization for these target populationstoward achieving a reduction in the recidivism rate.convictions and probation violations will also be trackedprogram.

Maintaining a low PCRwill reflect status

Participant new offensefor the duration of

5..

PERFORMANCEstatus of the following

MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end youKey Performance Indicators, at a minimum:

are required to report on the

0C

r a ioi1

aierI

ti1

o=_>11 un L

I - 1 l_

R irom'hi

H o

iarât l Tiny t

^ctp. pulaticrr. n^t n'n^ gnu ^ o_uses u1 oopulutioinsupport o,our objecti ' c

Tack the changes in PCP_, CDP LOS a,sed aeon ye_ir srcgram o ricctc , u

peiPart IThs v vill

r

f leet stct^,^ v

_

il:

;- ycui t

^cî

;sl1±.sall c Ida

T i^„ 1[,

Ian.- rl. T

',

,uC

-ruand cî

lice-°

Tal

er1roar

)n, i

t oî=

LIM

^. Tracr tnc_ucae

d! iLrlisLioaz

_Tul d

,1^ ioM F;rob3tori nor pr=AOM

c ampietions/raiiures6. Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as securing of

identification, completion of other monitored programs and conditions, etc., as you deemappropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary.

1. 60% of program participants will meet objectives as defined in their individualized plan forsuccess.

Page 5 of 5

CCAB:


Relapse Prevention and Recovery

t

c ;Service Provider:

C-E-1 Community Mental HealthCCIS Service Type: G18 - Substance Abuse (Outpatient)Projected Enrollment:



■ Residential:






addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address.• Use of individual sessions should be ' described when asked for.• New CCIS codes have been established to identify the specialized nature of some programs

and their populations:• Cognitive; Substance Abuse Treatment, Sex Offender Treatment, Employment, Life Skills, and

Domestic Violence programs are all programs that would use this form.• G00 is an option for "other" group-type programming not specifically identified here (discuss




ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICADLETO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM. The form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text when a drop-downoption with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses areanticipated permit carriage returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs.

Identify the objective(s) fron^zkyourielonyand/or jail analysis (Part I)°'that this program isdesigned to address:

Maintain PCRs in all categories and control jail population and early releases due to overcrowding.2 Gaspedon your objective(s))whatis yourtarget.populatio¢n?

Sentenced felons, fresh sentences and probation violations, with a priority on:straddle cell SGLs, level 2 and 3 probation violators, and QUIL 111 convictions

Page 1 of 5

? Describe the program:a. Based on what your program is intended to address (treatment effects) within your

targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria?

Includerequirements for assessments and assessment results.Aftercare: Sentenced felons successful completing residential treatment (having beenassessed as needing residential level treatment), SGL of 0-9 or greater or 0-6 orgreater on a probation violation, in lieu of or in reduction of a minimum of 90 days injail

Outpatient: Sentenced felon (fresh sentence or probation violation) with an SGL of 0-9or greater of 0-6 on a probation violation in lieu of or in reduction of a minimum of 60days in jail, assessed as needing outpatient level treatment, relapse followingresidential or community-based outpatient treatment program.

Priority populations: straddle cell SGLs, probation violators, OUIL ill conviction,b. Assessment (not screening) is the foundation of evidence-based practices. Referrals to

treatment programs should be based upon assessed needs. Please describe yourassessment practices below:

i.


Y ESReferred probationers must be assessed as needing outpatient level treatmentpursuant to ASAM criteria

ii.


Third party assessment provideriii.

Does the substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level oftreatment per American Society of Addition Medicine (ASAM) criteria?

Y ESiv.

Is there a process to ensure that offenders receive the recommended level oftreatment per the assessment?

Y ES, agentsc. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence

recommendation?

Sometimes, however there are cases when the Court orders anassessment and compliance with assessment recommendations as part of thesentence ( fresh cases and PVs)


Y ESd. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program?

NAe. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process.

Probation agents make referrals based on eligibility criteria, program staff verifieseligibility prior to enrollment, Community Corrections confirms eligibility through COGSreporting process.

f. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility.Program staff communicates ineligibility to referring agent. Community Correctionswill notify program staff and referring agent in cases where eligibility is questioned inin the CCMS reporting process. If determined ineligible, the participant will beterminated, unless continued participation is authorized by the CCAB Manager.


Monthly COOS reports are submitted by programstaff and entered into Case Management program by Community Corrections staff

Page 2 of 5


i. Name of curriculum (if applicable and please spell out abbreviations).Truthought - Charting a New Course Thinking Curriculum & Haze/don RelapsePrevention Skills program

ii. Number of sessions per week per cohort (group):

1 intake interview, 2 groupsessions per week for 10 weeks stepping down to 1 group session per week for1b weeks, followed by an exit interview

iii. How many cohorts?

38iv. Length of sessions:

1.5 hoursv. Understanding that some participants may take longer to master skills than

others, how many sessions, on average, are anticipated for programcompletion?

38vi. Identify what skills are taught in this program:

RP&R blends the Truthought:Charting a New Course curriculum with the Hazeldon Relapse Prevention Skillsprogram. Truthought teaches participants to identify and evaluate thinkingbarriers and replace them with responsible thinking correctives. The Haze/doncurriculum teaches participants how to keep recovery strong by identifyingtriggers, cravings, and situations that put them at risk for relapse; develop aplan to prevent using and reoffendingl; and build a trustworthy supportnetwork to help them stay sober and crime free.

vii. Identify if/how offenders transition between various phases or treatmentlocations (jail/residential/community) as applicable to your program:

RP&Rfollows residential treatment as an aftercare component and is also availableto sentenced felony probationers (fresh sentence or probation violation) whohave relapsed following outpatient level treatment received in the jail or in thecommunity

viii. Are individual sessions part of the program?

NOix. If individual sessions are part of the program and billed separately, how many

individual sessions are anticipated per participant? NAx. On what basis would individual sessions be used?

NAIdentifyprovidehas groupSubstanceprevention

the training or credentials held by your service provider qualifying him/her tothis service:

The RP&R group facilitator has a BS in Criminal Justice from MSU,facilitator experience with very difficult populations.

Has received CMH -Abuse Program required training including addiction theory and relapseand was trained in the Truthought curriculum.

j.

How aredocumentedparticipating

delivered services (for billing purposes) and offender progress and participationby the service provider?

Invoices will include the names of eachprobationer and the number of Phase I or II group sessions 'attended.

k.

How issource?reportsreportsand noncompliance

offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referralInclude frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of

provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc.

Monthly written progressare provided to the participant's assigned agent. Agent's are notified of intake

immediately.

Page 3 of 5

Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specificallyidentified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program:

As anaftercare component, this program adds to the continuum of care and availablesupport for those who have completed residential and are transitioning back into thecommunity. Because RP&R technically falls between OP and /OP and offers a differentcurriculum than other local programs, it is an excellent alternative to repeating OP forthose experiencing relapse after residential or other outpatient programs. RP&R alsorequires and monitors weekly participation in AA or SMART Recovery support groups.

J L

M

1:A I

n ^

re . ,

f li!o

Il„!

LIi

and

Il

e should b

is- soon-teen,gets. __n d i rein

1 in

a n> 1 1d ativir, your

t

snood

1_u;lb L. ,t'Y

ii

T, c lID

a. Will this program reduce prison commitments?

YESi. If YES, clearly describe how:

RP&R is used in conjunction with residentialtreatment as an alternative to prison for felony offenders with a straddle cellSGL and for level 3 probation violators, both of which are target populations.


YESi. If YES, clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for this

program:

Participants are sentenced to RP&R in lieu of or in reduction offal/time that includes residential in lieu of a minimum of 90 days in jail or jailsentences are reduced by a minimum of 90 days pending successful completionof the program. Participants sentenced directly to RP&R are sentenced to theprogram in lieu of a minimum of 30 days of fail time or jail sentences arereduced by a minimum of 30 days pending successful completion of theprogram.

ii. Estimate how many jail bed days will be saved due to this program anddescribe how your estimate was calculated:

Projected days saved: 4,35075% successful completion of 60 participants = 50; 10% or 5 participants x 60days saved = 300 days; 90% or 45 participants x 90 days saved = 4,050; 4,050 +300 = 4,350

c. Is this program intended to impact recidivism?

YES

Ila

-status

i.


RP&R specifically targets

PERFORMANCE

felony probationer relapseviolation commitmentachieving a reductionviolations will alsoMEASUREMENT: At

of the following Key Performance^(

Iecielnr_'ioOLlla^

and criminal thinking.rate for new offenses

in the recidivism rate.be trackedfor the duration

Midyear and Year endIndicators, at a

Li

A51L fen -1

i p Q

A reduction in the probationwill reflect status towardNew offenses and probation

of the program.you are required to report on the

minimum:r,9nl ne 01

,

ii: from this pi colain:

d

e

Illll`,%siinourt

II

T bepLilatlon

Trio

H

ne,ob- llne end

U

c

oil pis pulitlcns in

ehJcLiiTraci t i le changes in PCB_, 4DP arldjor LOS based uuon your program oa;ect!

_s. perPart I.

ThisI,it rut':ct_tntustoe.drd nchie,iemcn

of ,;ourobjeo*-r.'els). -TaskTr

,uI

bee do

s _n

ud - if applicable to your plc: am

esign

ssful and unsuccessful temat ens frn ,i she pn ga lll

uccessful/unsuccessful do-

si

en; IICiii i rOu`n:: for l,r

r_: r

Page 4of5

Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as newlyacquired or improved skills, tests passed, pre/post test results, etc., as you deem appropriate.Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary.

1. 70% of program participants will be involved in a meaningful activity such as employment, school,and/or volunteer work by the time they are successfully discharged.

2. 80% of program participants will self report an increase in overall satisfaction with their quality oflife as measured by a pre- and post Life Status Questionnaire.

3. Known relapse events will be tracked from the time of program enrollment and the length of timebetween relapse events for the duration of the program and correclated with SGL scores.

Page 5 of 5

CCAB:Ingham/LansingLocal Program Name: Holistic OUIL Ul Program Enhancements (HOPE)Service Provider: CEI-Community Mental Health - House of CommonsCCIS Service Type: ZOO - OtherProjected Enrollment: 23Projected Length of Stay: 70Does this program also use DDJR funding? YES If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? 18Program Location (select all that apply):

Jail: ❑

Residential: ❑

Community:Program Status (new, modification, continuation): ContinuationIf a modification, describe here:



"Other" programming/services not already identified by a CCIS Service Type/Code -• Before requesting funding for an "Other" coded program, discuss with your grant coordinator

to ensure the design can not be funded under an existing code.• Be prepared to thoroughly justify the need for the program/service and how it clearly relates

to a stated objective.

ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING " NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS` PARTICULAR PROGRAM.The form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text when a drop-downoption with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses areanticipated permit carriage returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs.

Maintain OUIL .111 PCR at8% to 12% and reduce the ALOS in jail by an average of 30 days.

Felony OUIL ill convicted offenders - fresh sentenceswith intermediate and straddle cell SGLs andlevel2 and 3 probation violations

a. Is an assessment required to determine eligibility?

YES Substance Abuse (S/A)Assessment with ASAM criteria indicating need for residential level S/A treatment

b. Based on what your program is intended to address within your targeted population,what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Be sure to include assessmentscores if applicable.Sentenced OUIL 111 felons with intermediate and straddle cell SGL scores who meet alleligibility for House of Commons residential substance abuse treatment services (DDJRfunding: must be intermediate cell or straddle cell with PVR less than 35)

Page 1 of 4

House of Commons eligibility criteria.:Assessed as needing residential level S/A treatment pursuant to ASAM criteria0-9 or greater SGL score on fresh sentence0-6 or greater SGL score on a probation violation

c. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentencerecommendation?

NOd. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program?

All OUIL 11!convicted residents of the House of Commons are automatically offered programenrollment

e. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process?

TheHouse of Commons program Director identifies eligible OUIL I!l program participants,Community Corrections monitors eligibility through CCIS and ensures that programservices are charged appropriately between DDJR and CPS.

f. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility.Program staff communicates ineligibility to referring agent. Community Correctionswill notify program staff and referring agent in cases where eligibility is questioned inin the CCIS reporting process. If determined ineligible, the participant will beterminated, unless continued participation is authorized by the CCAB Manager.

g. THOROUGHLY describe this program/service:

Holistic OUIL Ill PprogramEnhancement (HOPE). services address the physiological deficiencies of the recoveringalcohol addicted resident and work in conjuction with the cognitive based S/Atreatment provided at the House of Commons. HOPE services are designed to improvethe general health and well-being of participants for the purpose of improving theoverall treatment. result. Accupunture and nutritional therapy reduce cravings,alleviate mood swings, balance body chemist)/ and help to repair the physiologicaldamage done by the . alcoholism. By reducing the stressors associated with poorhealth and the struggle to remain abstinent, residents are able to engage in andmaintain amenability to treatment and achieve a better result.

HOPE program services:2 -1 hour full body accupuncture sessions per week to reduce stress, cravings, andImprove general health and sense of well-being4 - Nutritional Therapy Group Sessions teach and provide particpants with nutritionalinformation and specific tools that help curb and eliminate cravings, stab!ize bloodsugar levels, balance body chemistry and repair damage resulting from alcoholaddiction and to assist with the transition experienced by abstaining from alcohol.An Assessment is conducted and an Action Plan is developed for each participant thatincludes outcomes to be achieved, action steps and strategies for achieving andmaintaining change. Group sessions include instruction on making appropriate foodchoices and behavior modification techniques including role playing, guided imagery,and other exercises using state management, conditioning and anchoring tools.

Daily meals provided meet nutritional guidelines developed for recovering alcoholics.

By not adequately addressing the physiology of the alcohol addicted offender,

Page 2 of 4

treatment dollars are used to their maximum potential. Studies show that wellnourished recovering alcoholics remain sober longer because brin chemicals stay morebalanced, there are fewer emotional/mood ups and downs which act as triggerscausing increased withdrawal symptoms and relapses. 90% of alcoholics show markedhypoglycemic challenges. When hypoglycemia is controlled through proper nutrition,desire/cravings disappear. Additionally, the right foods can repair years of damagecaused by alcohol abuse.

h.

Why is this program/service critical to your plan?

The felony OUIL ill population istargeted for structured sentences that reduce jail time followed by residentialtreatment.

With OUIL Ill offenders being diverted to the 54-A and 55th District Court -Sobriety Courts, offenders who are sentenced in Circuit Court or sentenced onprobation violations in Circuit Court or in District Court due to failure in Sobriety Courtare the more serious and chronic of this population. A continuum of care thatexpedites the onset of structured, effective, long term community-based treatment forthis population is critical to reducing recidivism and maintaining public safety.

The House of Commons program in conjunction with HOPE provides the Court with acontinuum of treatment that can starts in the jail with the CMH-CATS programfollowed by HOC Rresidential - HOPE followed by Relapse Prevention & RecoveryAftercare.

-i.

How is CCIS data gathered/entered?

Monthly CC1S reports are submitted by programstaff and entered into Case Management program by Community Corrections staff.

j.

How are delivered services (for billing purposes) and offender progress and participationdocumented by the service provider?

invoices submitted include documentation(sign-in sheets for all sessions and invoices signed by the accupunturist and nutritionaltherapist) providing the resident names, dates of service, and type of service.

k.

How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referralsource? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types ofreports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc.

Monthly written progress reports are provided to the participant's assigned agent.Agent's are notified immediately of intake, termination and noncompliance.

j.

R [Et

"r i

. fli d !•^'J

:^

Y?^!n'Ei ~r

t ',"

"^

3{'w

wr art;f

w^

};

v

jf

^Fnd^

c vd0

*pL

{

A

ai+r

s^41.

yy.:i • .. S.il::: .T ..^...y.9,tur^.'y+J^LY

..

aji: -`' {

H

^.

/

.R.^

.fk.-..",\.rr

3 .

.Y•

5.

->J

Yy„ ...'vet:.

.8•

S

F ( -S'.'E;..

}£1'

.,,

:

'1

1'

1 '

'

L..w: Y^^ x ^Y^.,:•:

.I

M

J

.

t

^.-GM

':7J

y,

k

C^ a •.1 r.u

4

.^

'SC

tc

:a

'14 T1•ytp` i:rAjt(R%'rl:' y

^.r ''^•

7!;

YTr IT,

ifs

x,

:ad:

"j^ r^r

sf^f x

4Yî^•

{'C* 4i

NA, t[1L!^ ^^/{(I

f

I

, 1

U{'

1'^

igfi ti ^^l^

Y..•^. ^.: k,

^Y3.

;.

2`^

:d^!

Y

>^ Ye m ^7

^,;p:„ ;x

°

^

9

.fN

^. . G„y : /p li•1'-n

FM•i\

:î^:, i h

:3

:^'y S'i.•^

''

^^^."^•,11:..u

1 fz

}

'T.+

r x. -z-.:....

a .>

, . ° •...?L...

t.'

:jt..

.ii-Sr

.E1A.^

3{.wPv.d3'.-; . r• •

...

>

,::;:s,• r

. ..`^.,. t.:r, ...;..-.^ '.v-, H r ^Y'^,.

...

l:S

t..r.,.

:x1za:,:a^:

-F=,

•.

x.,.

,4_

..'F..^. ,

. v,_5 F".:.... gyp !

i .ry^1t,,

-^{,,..•{

:,

:

..1. w

♦ ..,

Y V

tIK uY.yj

•

...l1.-

]••^•.il.

I• . " J°-'..j` . ,'u:w .

sêl • 'Y>~

]^

^

x ^0 m ® U ^

^ O f 1tl t7 7 {^

i {I ?'

{ ,I ^

^

l`

a

'' ^ +I

sa(IPpf1 uJ I•

^

^

i1

3

^tÎ

j

ryk .

.^

,S e ll..

w-k: f!`' YE.'".'K::te

:'^r^2'Y$:s •Iii -At,:

1

r _-_:1...3

r.Txc

:5(!...:{'

.a: ,'.^,•fn+. •a. Will this program reduce prison commitments?

YES

I.


HOPE is used in conjunction with residentialtreatment following jail as an alternative to prison for felony offenders with astraddle cell SGL and for level 3 probation violators, both of which are targetpopulations.


Y ES

Page 3 of 4

i. If YES, clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for thisprogram:

Participants are sentenced to HOC - HOPE in lieu of or in reductionof jail time in lieu of a minimum of 90 days in jail or jail sentences are reducedby a minimum of 90 days pending successful completion of the program.

ii. Estimate how many jail bed days will be saved due to this program anddescribe how your estimate was calculated: Projected Days Save: 1,53075% successful completion of 23 participants = 17; 17 x 90 days saved = 1,530

c. Is this program intended to impact recidivism? Y ESi. If YES, describe how and how it will be measured: Program termination due

to new offenses and/or probation violations will be tracked for the duration ofthe program and also throughout the duration of the Relapse Prevention andRecovery Aftercare program.

6. Develop additional performance indicators based on the specifics of your program design.Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary.1. 80% of HOPE participants will report improved quality of fife including sleep, mental

clarity, concentration and stress level after completing treatment to measured using LikertScale scores on pre- and post Life Satisfaction surveys

2. 70% of HOPE participants will demonstrate improvement in general health categoriesincluding weight, blood pressure, gastrointestinal distress to be measured based on pre-and post general health assessments conducted by the HOC program nurse.

Page 4of4

.O e 12095 - Lansing, MI 48901 3a-3•>w,L asin iElistr

Dear Friend:

The Historical Society of Greater Lansing is pleased to announce that it is beginningestablish a local historical museum devoted to telling the stories of the people and businesses locatedin Greater Lansing. In conjunction with this goal, we would like to invite you to take part in our firstmuseum fundraiser, a silent auction, this fall. All money raised from this event will be used for thefuture development of a Lansing history museum. The event will take place on Saturday, October 8,2011 from 4:00pm-7:OOpm at Comerica Bank in downtown Lansing, located at 101 N. WashingtonSquare.

In 1947, the Historical Society of Greater Lansing was formed to promote Lansing's history througheducational programming and to collect historical items that would someday be exhibited in a localhistory museum. As the years passed, our vision for establishing a local history museum faded. Inlate 2010, the historical society decided to reclaim this original goal and has begun work to establisha historical museum devoted to the Greater Lansing area.

Our museum fundraiser will only be successful with the help of the Greater Lansing community.Enclosed in this letter you will find a donation form. In order to make this event a success, we willraise funds two different ways: both through event sponsorships and through the donation of items tobe auctioned. We would like to ask you to consider making a donation of whichever sort you fmdmost appropriate for your business.

For more information or if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by calling 517-282-0671 or e-mailing me at vrmaryinqslicOobal.net .

r-a

Thank you in advance for your support,

realer IA1min/1a

VALERIE MARVINPresidentHistorical Society of Greater Lansing

P.O. Igix 12095 - Lansing, MI 48901 wwwoLansingHistoryoorgGreater Lansing

The Historical Society of Greater Lansing is a 501 (c) (3) non-profit corporation.

Silent Auction Event Sponsorships & Auction DonationsHSGL Silent Auction - Saturday, October 8, 2011 - 4:OOpm-7:OOpmComerica Bank, 101 North Washington Square, Downtown Lansing

$5,000 - Platinum SponsorTop billing on all promotional materials, full-page advertisement in auction booklet (back cover orinside covers), 8 tickets to event$1,000 - Gold SponsorFull-page advertisement in auction booklet, 6 tickets to event$500 - Silver SponsorHalf-page advertisement in auction booklet, 4 tickets to event$250 - Bronze SponsorThird-page advertisement in auction booklet, 2 tickets to event$100 - Copper SponsorName included in list of sponsors in auction booklet, 2 tickets to event

(See reverse for advertising information)

} Auction Item DonationI can help the Historical Society by donating the following auction item(s):

Item Value $ I will mail my itemsPlease pick up my donation; it will be available for pick-up by

Donor Information

Name

Address

City State Zip

Phone E-mail

I understand that my donation may be used by HSGL in any way necessary to benefit HSGL Programs.

Signature Date

Make checks payable to the Historical Society of Greater Lansing.

Advertising Information

Below are representation of the sizes of advertisements for various levels of sponsorship. Advertisementsmust fit inside these dimensions to fit appropriately in the event program. Your black and white cameraready artwork should be in PDF or JPG format at 300dpi resolution, if possible. Please email artwork bySeptember 16, 2011 to [email protected] . If you have any questions or would like us to helpprepare an advertisement, please feel free to call David Marvin at (517) 282-1156.

Full Page AdFinished Size 5" x 8" Vertical Third Page Ad

Finished Size 5" x 2.75" Vertical

Half Page AdFinished Size 5" x 4" Vertical

Dear Lansing City Council Community Funding Committee:

July 18, 2011

I am writing on behalf of Lansing Neighborhood Council to expresssupport for Wexford Montessori Magnet School PTA. for activities andgames for the August 27, 2011 Community Celebration at New MountCalvary Baptist Church.

Wexford PTA became before the committee on June 20 `'', to seek thedonations to assist in this yearly function that is supported by commu-nity organizations on the Southside of Lansing. Wexford was told toseekco-applicant for this event, and we have graciously agreed to join inwith them for this great occasion.

If anything else is needed from us in reference to them being able tosecure the $500,00 funding for this event, please feel free to contactme at (517) 393-3998, or Janet Robinson (Wexford PTA) at 517 712-1077.

We look forward to participating in another event that supports andbring together a well deserving neighborhood, school and communityorganization.

Cheryl A. Risner

Sincerely,

Will Career Academy5015 Wise Fload, Room F200

Lansing, Michigan 40911

Phono.(517) 3993-9063Fax (517) 393-9085

lansingneighborhoods.com

!&..-4- -- 7// '/t'd

n .1717 '°N Wd88

IIR

8l 'l n r'

July 6, 2011

Chris SwopeOffice of the City ClerkLansing, MI

Re: Response to notice of snow violation - 650 Louisa

Dear Mr. Swope:

Today _l received two notices regarding snow removal at a registered rental property I own at 650Louisa St. I protest the city's claim that I -am responsible for charges related to snow removal -at thatproperty.

• The ordinance states that the city shall post a notice of snow violation at the property and-mail-notice to the property owner before the city clears the snow. I did not receive notice by mailwhich presumably should have been mailed to me the day of the violation or very shortlythereafter. The tenant who was there throughout the winter never indicated that any notice wasleft at the property. I contend that the city did not comply with the requirements of theordinance-which left me no, way to know of a violation-or. the city's_intent_tnelem. snow._

• I received two notices of a public hearing. Does-the city-claim-two-different-instances of snowremoval? Neither notice states a date of violation or date of snow removal. This, along withthe city's failure-to provide the 24-hour notice by mail, calls into question whether there wasany violation or snow removal.

I claim that there was no snow violation. At the least, the city did not follow the requirements of theordinance by mailing me a 24-hour notice. This is my protest of any charge or special assessmentrelated to a snow violation or snow clearing at 650 Louisa. Please respond in writing to confirm thatthere will be no charge or assessment.

Sincerely,

Kyle Vandecar630 Hillcrest Ave.East Lansing MI 48823

C-

CD

0 if

1

Lansing (MI) City Council info packet for Monday's July 25 meeting

Documents

Transcript of Lansing (MI) City Council info packet for Monday's July 25 meeting