Language of sustainbility Is there a public language of sustainability? 27-04-09 Joe Ravetz Centre...
-
Upload
samuel-brooks -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Language of sustainbility Is there a public language of sustainability? 27-04-09 Joe Ravetz Centre...
Language of sustainbility
Is there a public language of sustainability?
27-04-09
Joe Ravetz
Centre for Urban & Regional Ecology
University of Manchester
www.manchester.ac.uk/cure
Contents
• Discourse
• Public attitudes data
• Example – congestion charge
• Cultural & values models
• Towards a public language
“It’s the ecology, stupid.”Sir John Harman: ENDS lecture 24th November 2008
“..As seen from Westminster, the picture is one of conclusive science, emerging international pressures, a growing problem which has to be dealt with. But the public perception, even of human-induced climate change, is far less coherent. Surveys of media coverage still show a surprising parity between material supporting the reality of climate change and material denying it, or at least its human-induced component. To put it simply, the Government Chief Scientist may have the ear of the decision-makers but Clarkson and Wogan have the ear of a good part of the electorate.”
Huh.. believe that you believe
anything. They’re just
trying to scare us
Have you heard this one? they’re telling us we’ve
got 100 months to save the planet
But what if the scientists are right and the arctic ice is melting and the
deserts are advancing, and...and..
So – we’ve got the technology,...
when the price is right we’ll use it.
Huh.. believe that you believe
anything. The scientists are just trying to scare us so they get more
funding
Have you heard this one? they’re telling us we’ve
got 100 months to save the planet
Well I’m not about to change my lifestyle – I’ve worked hard for
all this and I’m not going to hand it
over to some green-bugged
hair-shirt merchant
But what if the climate crunch adds
up with the credit crunch, food
crunch, population crunch etc... Won’t
we all have to change our lifestyles?
In fact have you heard of this thing sus…
sustainabilityThat’s precisely it!! It’s a global media conspiracy to keep
people like you & me in suspense &
paranoia
Well I’m not about to change my lifestyle – I’ve worked hard for
all this and I’m not going to hand it
over to some green-bugged
hair-shirt merchant
But what if the climate crunch adds
up with the credit crunch, food shortages, population,
terrorism etc... Won’t we all have to
change our lifestyles?
Example – congestion charge
“Congestion charging: FAQs”
How do you feel about a plan to introduce congestion charging in Greater Manchester? The controversial scheme could bring in almost £3 billion of improvements to public transport. But critics say it's unfair. What's your view?
Comments
• “we can be called to travel across the city at anytime most often during the planned peak congestion charging hours. Public travel is not an option in the job we do! So will this be taken into consideration? We tried to work how much it will cost me to get to work and it will be approx £150 per month.
• “I am disgusted by this hair brained idea that some jumped up prats in offices who have nothing better to do then work out ways to nail us road users for even more tax than we are already paying. I am a training assesser and my job is to travel around company's in stockport and manchester, I live by the M60 (which i believe is going to be the boundary) this means I will cross it approx 6 to 10 times a day.
Comments
• We Won! No Congestion Charge in Manchester!
• Manchester gave Gordon Brown the finger!
• Well done all the people of Manchester who voted a resounding "NO" to Labour's stealth tax congestion charge! We hope this site has helped!
• “The Socialist City of Manchester wants to introduce congestion charging to the city. The model will be similar to the scheme Red Ken Livingstone introduced in London (but covering a much larger area). This is where Manchester people get their one and only opportunity to stop this crazy proposed highway robbery.
Inconvenience
Cost – can’t afford it
Bureaucracy gone mad
(“Red Ken”)
“Public trans” no thanks
“we already pay our taxes”
“Public trans” should sort it out
“We would all be better off”
Govt will give us £3 billion
Roads will be better too
Good for those without cars
“Public trans” (for losers)
Pollution & climate change
“Freedom of the road”
“just look at Barcelona”
Socialism - back door
Cost of running the scheme
Me and mine
Government / politicians /
bureaucracy
Business & money
Media & sport
Science & technology
What’s it all about
Charity / pressure groups
Cultural theory
collectivist approach
certainty style & risk averse
PUBLIC SECTOR: HIERARCHISTS
NGO SECTOR: EGALITARIANS
PRIVATE SECTOR: PIONEERS
CONSUMERS & FATALISTS
uncertainty style & risk taking
individualist approach
General outline of human types in cultural theory. (‘NGO’ = ‘non governmental organization’). Source: adapted from Douglas & Wildavsky 1986; Thomson 1994.
Climate Example
• Avoid the violent agreement logjam -segment propositions by psychology
Inner directed Outer directed Security driven
Right thing (moral) Clever thing (smart) Safe thing (identity)
Inner directed
Outer directed(esteem driven)
Sustenance (security) driven
Ethics, new things,
Status, success
consumption
Tradition, security
Change re ‘environment’ concern
• 1960s - 1970s - inner directed only• 1980s - 1990s - inner + esteem (outer) directed• 1990s - 2000s - all groups share it but• = logjam on how to take action (>delay)• = not ‘news’ any longer• = normed - only breaking norm is ‘news’
Cultural dynamics
• Transitionals• Concerned ethicals• Flexible individuals• Happy followers• Transcenders• Tomorrow people• Now people• Golden dreamers• Certainty first• Brave new world• Smooth sailing • Roots
• Value Modes Research• 10 questions > 12
groups 95%+ confidence
• 5500 base in UK population
• segment to groups• relate to 70+ attributes• Cultural Dynamics Ltd
e. g. The Now People
• “We want the world and we want it NOW”! This could be the motto for these people. They have a hunger for life and want to devour it - to consume it all. Life is a party to be enjoyed and they want to be at the centre of it. They have probably the greatest need for the approval of others and this drives their wonderful set of empathetic social skills. They attract others to them, and the high energy they create, like a magnet. They look for the flash and intensity in all situations. They want the romanticised version of reality. This can create financial bedlam, but they accept the consequences and just go ahead and “do it” anyway.
Huh.. believe that you believe
anything. They’re just
trying to scare us
Have you heard this one? they’re telling us we’ve
got 100 months to save the planet
But what if the scientists are right and the arctic ice is melting and the
deserts are advancing, and...and..
So – we’ve got the technology,...
when the price is right we’ll use it.
Huh.. believe that you believe
anything. The scientists are just trying to scare us so they get more
funding
Have you heard this one? they’re telling us we’ve
got 100 months to save the planet
Well I’m not about to change my lifestyle – I’ve worked hard for
all this and I’m not going to hand it
over to some green-bugged
hair-shirt merchant
But what if the climate crunch adds
up with the credit crunch, food
crunch, population crunch etc... Won’t
we all have to change our lifestyles?
In fact have you heard of this thing sus…
sustainabilityThat’s precisely it!! It’s a global media conspiracy to keep
people like you & me in suspense &
paranoia
Well I’m not about to change my lifestyle – I’ve worked hard for
all this and I’m not going to hand it
over to some green-bugged
hair-shirt merchant
But what if the climate crunch adds
up with the credit crunch, food shortages, population,
terrorism etc... Won’t we all have to
change our lifestyles?
Beliefs about the impact of behaviours on the UK’s contribution to climate change if most people in UK were prepared to do them, 2007
Beliefs about the number of people in the UK who are willing to take up behaviours that could impact upon the UK’s contribution to
climate change, 2007