Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium,...
-
Upload
margarita-pendleton -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium,...
![Page 1: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Language and Culture Prof. R. HickeySS 2006
The evolution of language
Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN)Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN)Brigitte Knocke Martina Kleinebreil (Grundstudium, TN/LN)Frauke Skrobaschewsky (Hauptstudium, TN/LN)
![Page 2: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Table of Contents
1. The Study of Language2. Language Origin3. The Evolution of Language
The Emerge of Rule The Expansion of Language
4. Diffusion of Language
![Page 3: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Study of Language
Melanie Lüth
![Page 4: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Theories• language must have evolved between 100,000 to 50,000
years ago; some researchers date the evolving around 250,000 years ago
• Different ludicrous views:
1. Noah’s Ark view: Chinese as primitive language was spoken in the Ark and so survived the flood
2. Lord Monboddo: people learned different skills from different animals → to sing and speak from birds by imitating
![Page 5: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Theories – a bird-like skill
→ only shows that parallel systems can emerge independently
![Page 6: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Evidences
• external – clues from outside human language
→ evolutionary theory, archaeology, anatomy and physiology, ethology, psychology, anthropology
• internal – information from languages itself → provided by linguistics→ pidgins and creoles are valuable sources
![Page 7: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Amoeba Question• Did language elaborate from a simple outline? • Did a mish-mash become neat and orderly?
• bow-wow theoryhunters imitated the sounds of animals they wanted to track down
• Rousseau/ Jespersenfirst languages were singable and more passionate – became simple and methodical
• spaghetti junctionsvarious possibilities existed and were used – in the long run certain features were more likely to be chosen
![Page 8: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Rabbit-out-of-hat problem
• language emerged fairly suddenly (like a rabbit out of a hat)• mutation in hominid gene pool • extra use for already enlarged brain
but: • language evolved slowly over millennia
![Page 9: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Why do languages differ?
• new appearances could not be handled with properly (e.g. (new) thoughts could not be expressed properly)
• differences between and within languages are signs of a flexible and adjustable system
• ‘Tower of Babel’
![Page 10: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Why do languages differ?• ‘Swiss army knife’ view: specialized linguistic system, which
allows variation• human mind as gadget with numerous specialized devices • humans acquire language through a language-handling
mechanism• difference of language according to an inherited degree of
flexibility
• ‘Auntie Maggie’s remedy’ view: languages differ because human general intelligence produced them
• language is one of many different tasks children have to encounter – use the mind to sort out the way it works
• tasks can be encountered in different ways
![Page 11: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Why do languages differ?• hard-wired: - pre-programmed
- do not have to be learned- instinctive - (Swiss army knife)
• soft-wired: - can be acquired- have to be learned - Auntie Maggie’s remedy
• past: nature – nurture; hard – soft; instinct – learning controversies
• present: ‘innately guided behaviour’
![Page 12: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Conclusion
• many theories – scientific or non-scientific – were propounded
• Amoeba Question and the rabbit-out-of-hat problem
• differing: - Swiss Army Knife vs. Auntie Maggie’s remedy; hard-wired vs. soft-wired;
- innately guided behaviour
![Page 13: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The origin of language
Ivo Tateo
![Page 14: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Human’s history of evolution175,000 BP
300,000 BP
1,5 m BP
2 m BP
3 m BP
4 m BP
4,5 m BP
Homo sapiens sapiens (modern humans)
Archaic Homo sapiens
Homo erectus (upright man)
Homo abilis (handy man)
Homo (man)
Australopithecus afarensis
Australopithecus ramidus
![Page 15: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The principle of Natural Selection
In 1859 Charles Darwin published the book “On the origin of species” in which he demonstrated that Humans are the result of a long evolution.
He explained the principle of Natural Selection with these words:
“Any variation, if profitable to an individual of any species
will tend to the preservation of that individual, and will be
generally inherited by its offspring. I have called this principle
by the term of Natural Selection ”.
![Page 16: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
How did Language emerge? Language emerged
suddenly, as a rabbit out of a hat. This would be possible because humans are endowed with an innate language faculty (Chomsky).
Language is the result of a long process, creeping upwards in complexity over millennia, like a snail creeping up a wall. Language capacity increased very slowly.
The most accredited theory is that of a ‘language bonfire’. After this theory, sparks of language have been flickering for a long time before language begun a fast evolution and then stabilized around 50,000 years ago.
Language evolution alternated between periods of stasis (stagnation) and periods of fast development (Eldredge and Gould).
![Page 17: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Representation of the ‘Language Bonfire’ on a graph
250,000 BP 100,000 BP
75,000 BP 50,000 BP YearsBP
Complexity of language
![Page 18: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The development of Language
Key properties of Language
Interaction Persuasion
The Grooming Theory: grooming is for animals a factor of social interaction as language for humans.
Maybe language is a substitution for grooming, since:
- Humans are ‘naked apes’ with little hair for grooming
- Great groups of primates tend to abandon grooming
![Page 19: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The development of Language
Key properties of language
Interaction Persuasion
The theory of mind
The ability to deceive may be an important prerequisite for language, which is not only confined to humans.
This process (we may also talk about ‘lying’) implicates that the individual is able to put himself into another person’s shoes and act to his own advantage.
![Page 20: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The search for the missing link
The gestural origin of speech
Sign language is easier than speech
The idea that gestures are universal
Neurological connection between speech and movements
How did language get started? Many support the gestural theory, which claims that sign language is the missing link between the primate communication and human language. These supporters emphasize four reasons:
![Page 21: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Basic requirements for human language
The human voice-box or larynx is more streamlined than that of other primates; it is also positioned lower than in other primates.
The particular position of the larynx, the complexity of the muscular tongue and the possibility to produce vowels via mouth, allow the human beings to produce three fairly extreme vowels:
[i] [a] [u]
ƀ Sound-producing ƀ Sound-receiving
ƀ Sound-planning ƀ Sound-interpreting
![Page 22: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ConclusionLanguage appeared about 200,000 years ago and developed very fast between 100,000 and 75,000 years ago (language bonfire theory)
Language probably emerged to satisfy a need of interaction or to influence other individuals
Language probably developed from gesture. Sign language has been the intermediate between the two:
Primate communication Sign language Human language
Sound-producing, sound-receiving, sound-planning, sound-interpreting mechanisms and the particular position of the larynx, among others, allow the human beings to produce sounds which are unique to our species.
![Page 23: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The evolution of language
The emergence of rules -Brigitte Knocke
![Page 24: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The emergence of rules A language needs ‘rules’. Communication would break down if there
were no agreed ways of combining linguistic units.
In theory there are nearly endless possibilities to combine words and sounds. However, any full language has narrowed down the range of possibilities to a few allowable combinations
=> the grammar.
![Page 25: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
How could grammar have arisen in the evolution of language?
Simple rules have two requirements:
1. different types of basic units must exist
2. ways of combining the units must be agreed
![Page 26: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Different types of basic words
Nouns are the basic words, which arose before other types of words were developed
Nouns and verbs together constituted the first ‘grammar’ => humans could mentally distinguish things and people from actions and events for a long time before establishing them as nouns and verbs.
Nouns and verbs are regarded as the universal categories of all languages.
![Page 27: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
The combination of words as a requirement for the emergence of grammar
Grammar emerged when noun-type words were combined with verb-type words.
Two possible ways by which nouns and verbs could have been combined:
1. ‘build-up’-route
2. ‘re-analysis’ -route
![Page 28: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The build-up route
....assumes that a large number of single words accumulated. These were words of different types, some involving things, others actions. At a later stage these words were combined.
e.g. child: “mummy open” as a request for “Mummy please open this”
![Page 29: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The re-analysis route
...assumes that words, mainly nouns, were already being combined, but that sometimes more than one interpretation was possible
e.g. the word ‘singsing’ in Tok Pisin (pidgin, Papua New Guinea)
(singsing = any festival which involves dancing and singing)
ð “mi singsing” means “I went to the song and dance festival” or “I sang and danced”
![Page 30: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Consistent ordering of wordsThere are several possibilities as to how a firm word order might have happened in the evolution of languages
the signing of chimps the utterances of Vincent, a child of deaf parents the predispositions of the human mind
![Page 31: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
1. The signing of chimps - Nim Chimpsky
At first sight Nim’s signing was quite unordered.
However Nim had some preferences: -- food was placed first: “grape eat, banana Nim eat, apple me eat” --“more” at the beginning: “more eat, more tickle, more drink,..” --his own name at the end --repetition of words: “eat Nim eat, Nim eat Nim”
ð Nim’s ordering resembles the process found when a language acquires new word-order rules:
mild stylistic preferences change into strong preferences which stabilize, become a habit and form a pattern which influences the formation of others.
![Page 32: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
2. The utterances of Vincent, child of deaf parents
Vincent: hearing child of deaf parents who taught him sign language. He did not speak and heard sounds only by watching television. He was first exposed to speak English when he was over three years old.
at first his speech was barely intelligible and only slowly his speech became clear
short utterances: “You –uh-oh” limited vocabulary: „puter“ was a general, all-purpose verb. “You”: several meanings: you, he, she tendency to “copy-around” a word, to put one form on both sides of
another “You house you”
![Page 33: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The way Vincent put words together was bizarre.
However when his repeats and copying around were omitted, a clear word ordering preference appeared
=> he constructed many sentences according to a basic, but private, plan
![Page 34: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
=> Both the chimp and the child show that an optional word order can become a preferred order which later becomes a certain rule.
![Page 35: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
3. Human mind setOur human-mind set dictates how we see the world and create the language.‘Ontological categories’, such as people, things, actions, events, provide a universal initial structure of the language of thought on which language is based.
The innate thought structure also covers the way in which words may be combined.
e.g. The cat sat on the mat. The dog lay under the table.not: The mat lay under the cat. The table stood over the dog.
=> The location of ‘small onto large’ may be due to the human mind-set. Human thoughts run along certain routes, which are likely to affect the order of participants in a grammar.
![Page 36: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Preferences and pre-linguistic rules ‘animate first preference’:
It is more normal to say “Patsy was hit on the head by a ball” than “A ball hit Patsy on the head”
=> The ‘animate first preference’ is not due to any obvious linguistic factor, but the human mind-set plays an important role.
The ‘animate first’ preference is linked to an ‘actor first’ principle, because in real life animates act on lifeless things more often than the other way round.
The preferences are based on pre-linguistic mind-sets, which explain why so many languages show similarities.
![Page 37: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Summary Language began when words were combined. There are several theories on how grammar could have arisen:
-out of ‘build-ups’: putting individual words together,
-out of ‘re-analyses’ of combined nouns. At first many word combinations were possibly repetitive and
inconsistent. The examples of the chimp and the child Vincent show how rules may
have became fixed: optional orders became strong preferences which later became rules.
The original preferences were probably on pre-linguistic ‘mind-sets’ => explains why so many languages show similarities
![Page 38: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
The evolution of language
The expansion of language – Martina Kleinebreil
![Page 39: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
First steps
- Humans named themselves - parts of body- the immediate environment
![Page 40: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Inwards and Outwards
Inwards and Outwards The human body, and the space surrounding it,
presumably formed the basis of further meaning extensions.
![Page 41: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Outwards: Humans body-parts move outwards to features of
environment.
e.g.Tok Pisin (Papua New Guinea)
![Page 42: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
het = headhet bilong diwai - top of a tree
han = handhan bilong diwai – branch of a treehan bilong pik – front legs of a pig
Or even in English: head of state
![Page 43: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Inwards: Outer behaviour is a regular source for talk about the
inner mental self.
e.g. Physical sight expressions
I see what Helen means.Peter is still in the dark.
![Page 44: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Physical holding - mental grasping: - Did you grasp what he meant?
- Did you get this?- Paul hold on to his point of view.
![Page 45: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Adpositions (Pre- & Postpositions) - a limited number of prepositions
- re-apply of the old ones, instead of inventing new ones.
![Page 46: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Tok Pisin:mi go long taun – I go to town
mi kam long town – I come from town
mi stap long haus – I stayed at home
mi paitim dok long stik – I hit the dog with a stick
![Page 47: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Nouns – durable: dog, skyVerbs – rapid change: swim, go, hit properties – hot day, green house
properties are less time-stable than nouns, but more time-stable than most verbs
![Page 48: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
1st possibility Subdivision into stative and non- stative verbs
non-stative: kill, shootstative: be-green, be-ill
(Mandarin Chinese, Yoruba)
![Page 49: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
2nd possibility adjectives as an extra category
border-line between nouns/adj.and verbs/adj. seems arbitrary
e.g. a gold watch noun a lasting peace verb
![Page 50: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
In the early days verbs and adjectives were probably indistinguishable.To reach a clear distinction later word- endings were added.
![Page 51: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
But a language is still not complete with just a few parts of speech, and various attachements for its verbs.
![Page 52: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
So from this point on it´s still a long way to today´s language
![Page 53: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Diffusion
Frauke Skrobaschewsky
![Page 54: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Moving outwards
roughly 75.000 years ago humans moved out of Africa and into Asia
first to Asia Minor then westwards to Europe eastwards to the Far East and Australia
![Page 55: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
![Page 56: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
the last continent to be populated was America crossed from northeastern Siberia into northwest
Alaska went by boat via the Bering Strait smalls groups probably spoke dialects of the same language
![Page 57: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
![Page 58: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
The hunt for Universals
language universals = features which occur in all languages
any human can learn any language, so something must link all languages together
a possible list of “narrow“ absolute universals:
![Page 59: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
All languages
1) have consonants and vowels 2) combine sounds into larger units 3) have nouns words for people & objects 4) have verbs words for actions 5) can combine words
![Page 60: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
All languages
6) can say who did that to who 7) can negate utterances 8) can ask questions 9) involve structure-dependance 10) involve recursions
![Page 61: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
finding absolute linguistic universals is hard because they differ in details from language to language
![Page 62: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Constraints
language must have constraints which prevent it from flying apart in different directions
constraints are hard to find promising approach is the search for constraining links
language constructions are often linked tp one another in implicational chains
Noam Chomsky‘s ‘paramter setting‘ best known implicational theory
![Page 63: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Chomsky‘s parameter setting children have an inbuilt knowledge of some
basic language principles in addition they are instinctively aware of some
key ‘either/or‘ options they need to find out which options their own
language selects the extra information follows automatically
![Page 64: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
The future
there are about 6.000 languages spoken today in this century 90% of all languages will cease to
exist 3.000 languages are ‘moribund‘: no longer
learned as a first language by the new generation of speakers
the few languages that will remain will spread across the world
![Page 65: Language and Culture Prof. R. Hickey SS 2006 The evolution of language Melanie Lüth (Hauptstudium, TN) Ivo Tateo (Hauptstudium, TN) Brigitte Knocke Martina.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551c202f5503469e4f8b5ac2/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Sources
Aitchison, John. The seeds of speech – Language origin and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1996.
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/alumni/get-involved/world-map/world-map.gif