Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

17
Language Advocacy for the 21 st Century Bill Rivers Joint National Committee for Languages SWCOLT 2014 April 25, 2014

description

Presentation by Bill Rivers at SWCOLT State Leadership Breakfast

Transcript of Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

Page 1: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

Bill RiversJoint National Committee for Languages

SWCOLT 2014April 25, 2014

Page 2: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

Overview

• Why become an advocate?– Language matters! But how do we tell that story?

To whom?• Advocacy at the national level: JNCL-NCLIS• What you can do

Page 3: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

Language Matters

• We know this• But we need to tell the story• Why, exactly, does language matter?• To whom & how do we tell the story?

Page 4: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

Why Language Matters

• Fundamental 21st century skill, with consequences for– National security– Economic growth and jobs– Social justice

• (unbelievable) Cognitive & educational benefits of language instruction

• Increasingly, part of STEM• Global Talent Gap

Page 5: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

Policy Challenges: Why we need to tell the story

• Cuts in US Department of Education & lack of policy focus at the national level

• This reinforces the myth that “nobody cares” – BUT• Public policy attitudes are remarkably supportive (Rivers et al,

2013)• K-12 investment in FL: Utah, Delaware, Texas, Kentucky,

Tennessee, DC, NYC, Los Angeles, and many more states & districts

• Anecdotal evidence of growth – teacher shortages in K-12 in French, German, Spanish, other Ls (but no data on programs and growth since mid-aughts)

• Language = Jobs! (more on this in a moment)

Page 6: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

The impact of world language instruction• Achievement:

– Dual language immersion can reverse literacy achievement gaps, regardless of SES of immersion students: NC, OR

• Cognition:– Easier to learn additional languages (Rivers & Golonka, 2009, for an overview),

regardless of when/how 2nd language acquired– Better financial decisions (Boaz et al., 2012)– Delays onset of dementia (Alladi et al., 2013)– Caveats:

• Must USE the language• Higher proficiency = more effect

• http://www.languagepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/K-12-dual-language-one-page-report-Final.pdf

Page 7: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

FL & STEM• FL is already part of STEM!– FL Research and Development in the US Gov’t comes

almost exclusively from STEM accounts (DARPA, IARPA, NSF, NIH, DDRE)

– FL work is highly technologized – teaching, translation, interpreting

– The language industry is vital to the US STEM industry, leveraging $1.5 trillion in trade

• White House Office of Science & Technology Policy requested a position paper from JNCL-NCLIS (May 2013)

• languagepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/LSTEM.pdf

Page 8: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

Global Talent: Requirements• US hi-tech industry faces a Global Talent Gap• Survey of US and Global Fortune 100 companies and their language

suppliers (now underway, JNCL-NCLIS and GALA) shows:– Language competency at a variety of levels for a wide range of jobs– Language proficiency entails cultural sophistication and intercultural ability– Global skills = (Language, Culture, Professional Skills)

• GLOBAL SKILLS ENTAIL ADDITIONAL PROFESSSIONAL DOMAINS

– critical tool for interactions with customers, employers, peers, social communities, and governments.

– Companies need workers who can engage comfortably within and between cultures and languages, • using language skills to amplify and extend their job performance.

– Language is no longer a “soft” skill;• intertwined with the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics)

Page 9: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

Federal FL Programs• Department of Education

– FLAP: Still unfunded– Title VI/Fulbright-Hays: $2m increase in FY14; $4m increase in FY15

request • Department of Defense

– NSEP/Flagship: Level funded• StarTalk: 10% cut in 2014• State Department exchange and language programs

– President’s budget has$17m (3%) increase• Uncertainty in FY15 appropriations

Page 10: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

Current Legislation• Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA, aka “NCLB”)

– Senate version replaces FLAP with block grants for “well-rounded education”

– House Republican version has no FL funding support– House Democratic version keeps FLAP intact and incorporates the

Foreign Language Education Partnership Act• Foreign Language Education Partnership Act

– Introduced by Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ-12); 9 co-sponsors– Would create funding for sequences of K-12 FL education

• Bilteracy Education Seal and Teaching Act (BEST Act)– Introduced by Rep. Julia Brownley (D-CA-26); 13 co-sponsors– Grant funding for states to develop bilteracy diplomas and improve FL

teaching

Page 11: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

JNCL-NCLIS Legislative Priorities & Actions

• 2013-2014: 70+ offices visited on a recurring basis• Staff briefings

– August 2013– September 2013– April 2, 2014

• Fund FLAP!• Increase funding for Title VI/F-H by 10m• Maintain funding for

– StarTalk– Defense Language Program– State Department exchanges and language programs

• Maintain FLAP in ESEA

Page 12: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

Growing JNCL-NCLIS forA Stronger Voice

• New logo!• New website: www.languagepolicy.org • Membership growth:

– July 2012: 63 members– March 2014: 91members

• Partnership with Globalization and Localization Association– PR– Advocacy

• Partnership with ACTFL:– CapWiz– State Teams

• Languages for All• Member Services: SCOLA

Page 13: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

New Initiatives• GALA Global Talent Program

– Gap Analysis– Demand signal for education

• Languages for All– Anglophone Academies (UK, Australia, US); Summit, Sept. 30th 2013 @ UMD– Accessible language programming to high levels of skill is feasible, But requires significant work– 2014:

• Organizing committee (American Councils, ACTFL, JNCL-NCLIS, GALA, CASL, CAL)• Secretariat & fund-raising• PR campaign

• Partnership for Languages in the US (PLUS): can models of successful high level language programming be disseminated?– 45 IHEs met in Austin, Nov 2013 – Deans, Chairs, Directors, VPs– Organizing committee– Hosting (3 universities bidding to host)

Page 14: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

What you can do (1)

• Be the best program you can!– Student and parental enthusiasm & support

• Support your organizations’ advocacy efforts– CSCTFL: Phyllis Farrar, [email protected]

• Local and state level:– Let us know if something is afoot – good or bad – before

happens– State organization, regional, ACTFL, AAT, and JNCL-NCLIS

• Respond to action alerts (ACTFL & JNCL-NCLIS)– http://capwiz.com/actfl/home/

Page 15: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

Advocacy how-to in one slide!

• Be yourself & tell your story• Handouts:

– One page!– Point of contact for follow-up

– 10th grade reading level – elected officials need the gist of things, fast.• Elected officials – their concerns

– Jobs at home– Quality of education– Reputation of state/region– And WL effects these in a positive way!

• Be 5 minutes early!• Dress for success – we take our work and their time seriously• Get their contact info (usually staff) and send

– Thank you note– Your handouts

Page 17: Language Advocacy for the 21st Century

References• On financial decision making: Boaz Keysar, Sauyri L. Haykawa, & Sun Gyu An. 2012. “The

Foreign-Language Effect: Thinking in a Foreign Tongue Reduces Decision Biases,” Psychological Science, 23, 6, 661-668.

• On third language acquisition: See Rivers and Golonka, 2009, and the reference cited there. Rivers, W., and E. Golonka. 2009. “Third Language Acquisition – A Qualitative Investigation of Factors Influencing Program Development,” in R. D. Brecht, L. A. Verbitskaja, M. D. Lekic and W. P. Rivers, (eds). Mnemosynon: Studies on Language and Culture in the Russophone World. Presented to Dan E. Davidson by his students and colleagues/Мнемозинон: язык и культура в мире руссофонии. Сборник статей к юбилею Дэна Дэвидсона от его учеников и коллег. Moscow: Azbukovnik, 415-31.

• On closing the achievement gap: Collier, V., & W. Smith. 2011. English Learners in North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Education. http://esl.ncwiseowl.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_4502383/File/NC_ELL_Study_Yr2_Final%20Report_Jul27_2011.pdf

• On policy attitudes: Rivers, W., Robinson, J. P., Brecht, R, and Harwood, P. 2013. “Language Votes: Attitudes toward Foreign Language Policies,” Foreign Language Annals, 46(3), 329-338.