Land Cover Classification in Suriname...Feb 03, 2015 · 2. National Classifications for Land Cover...
Transcript of Land Cover Classification in Suriname...Feb 03, 2015 · 2. National Classifications for Land Cover...
Land Cover Classification in Suriname TRAINING ON NATIONAL LAND COVER AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS
PARAMARIBO, MARCH 09 2015
Structure of the presentation
1. Physiographic regions
2. National classifications for land cover
3. Vegetation type classes
4. National land cover classification maps
5. International reporting
6. Vision for developing LCCS for Suriname
2
1. Physiographic regions
Legend
1. Precambrian Guiana Shield area, popularly
also known as the Interior, the Interior
Uplands, or the Hill and Mountain Land
2. Cover landscape; also known as Zanderij or
Savanna Belt (Late Tertiary)
3. The Old Coastal Plain:
a. Old ridges and sea clay flats (Pleistocene)
b. Swamps (Early Holocene)
4. Young Coastal Plain (Late Holocene)
3
2. National Classifications for Land Cover
Forest vs Non-forest
Definition according to the Forest Management Act (1992):
“All land covered with trees, shrubs and other vegetation including beaches, herbaceaous wetland and savannas which is
suitable for harvesting wood and/ or for collection of non forest timber products, including wildlife and /or used for soil
protection, sustenance of the stability of the environment of for purposes of recreation including all land which has been
reforested or which in the opinion of the Minister of Natural Resources may in future be utilize for such purposes, this
excluding:
a. open field within an area of woodland which open field is larger than a surface as to be determined by state decree
b. land which is actually used for agriculture, mining, construction, permanent settlements or other purposes not provided for
by law, provided that such is not contrary to any locally applicable national or regional development programme as referred
to in the Planning Act
c. The regions designated by virtue of the 1954 Nature Protection Act “
⇒ Administrative definition, difficult to use for monitoring
4
2. National Classifications for Land Cover
Forest vs Non-forest
Developing a new definition, in line with international forest definitions of FAO and UNFCCC
Criteria currently used:
- minimal land area: 1ha
- minimal tree height: 5 m
- minimal crown cover: 30%
Still in discussion:
- abandoned plantations (currently included as forest when they comply to the above-mentioned
criteria)
- shifting cultivation (currently merged with forest)
- ...
5
2. National Classifications for Land Cover
FOREST
● FRA- classes:
○ Primary forest
○ Other naturally generated forest
○ Planted forest
○ Mangrove forest
● Further subdivision of primary forest into forest types
NON-FOREST
● IPCC-classes:
○ crop land
○ wetland
○ settlements
○ grassland
○ other land
● to be validated with national stakeholders
6
Classification of vegetation types based on: structure, physiognomy and floristic
composition
Overview of existing classification of vegetation types for Suriname:
3. Vegetation type classes
Structure Physiognomy Floristic composition
Lindeman and Molenaar (1955) 1 2
Dillewijn (1957) 2 1
Cox F. (1998) 1 2
Teunissen (1978) 2 1
SarVision (2010) 1 2
Narena (1998) 2 1
NFI pilot project (2013) 2 1 7
3. Vegetation type classes - Challenges
Example of one forest type with different names:
1) High Dryland forest (SarVision, 2010)
2) High mesophytic rain forest (Ter Steege, 2005)
3) High dryland forest (Lindeman and Molenaar, 1955)
4) High dryland forest/ High dryland forest with small crowns/ High dryland
forest with medium crowns (1998)
5) High dryland forest (pilot NFI-manual, 2014)
6) Lowland high forest (used in CBD, based on LBB 1990)
OR Marsh forest vs. periodically flooded swamp forest
8
4. National Land Cover Classification Maps
Ecosystems map Teunissen/Stinasu 1978
Vegetation map National Planning Atlas 1988
Vegetation map CELOS/NARENA 1998
Forest Cover map SarVision map 2010
Forest Cover maps 2000, 2009, 2013 made by SBB
9
4. Ecosystems Map Teunissen 1978
10
Produced by Teunissen/Stinasu
For coastal part of Suriname
Aerial photographs and field
visits
4. National Planning Atlas 1988
Produced by National Planning
Office with technical assistance
of Organization of American
States
Based on map of Teunissen,
CBL for hilly/mountain area
To provide spatial review of
geographic, demographic and
socioeconomic information
Classes
Mangrove Forest; Saltwater and brackish march
Lagoon
Freshwater marsh and swamp scrub
Low swamp forest
High swamp forest
High seasonal swamp forest
High dryland forest
Mountain forest (>500m)
High and low xerophytic forest
Savanna
Vegetation on granite outcrops
Vegetation on cultivated and abandoned land
11
4. Vegetation map 1998
Classes
Mangrove forest
Beach and littoral woodland
Grass-, fern- and peat swamp
Low swamp forest
High swamp forest
Open to closed palm marsh forest
Marsh forest
Creek forest
Mixed marsh forest and mesophytic high dryland forest
Predominate
Shifting cultivation
Tree plantation
(Sub-) urban area, cultivated land and abandoned
plantations
Produced by NARENA
Landsat visual interpretation
with existing ancillary data
(CBL-maps, Ecosystem map
etc.) and field verification data
As indicative map to stimulate
national discussions
12
4. SarVision 2010
Classes
Level I Level II
Wet soil vegetation types Creek forest Marsh forest Close palm marsh forest Open palm marsh forest Semi-open palm marsh forest Marsh forest 2/creek 2 (interior) Swamp forest Mangrove Herbaceous 1 Herbaceous 2
Dry Vegetation Types High dryland forest Mountain forest Savanna Forest Herbaceous dry Scrub and low savanna shrubs Scrub 2 / Woodland savanna Secondary Forest
Bare Cultivated areas (6 different) Roads Open water Urban (Paramaribo)
Produced by SarVision
ALOS PALSAR radar satellite
images at 50m resolution used.
With existing ancillary data
(CBL-maps, Ecosystem map
etc.) and aerial photographs
Framework of the KfW REDD+
project of CI Suriname
13
Existing classifications are used to translate as best as possible to specific
international criteria
Some broad (CBD), others have existing classifications (UNFCCC with IPCC
classes)
5. International Reporting
Estimated land
cover classes
(UNFCCC)
14
6. Vision for developing LCCS for Suriname
In accordance with international definitions
Close linkage with the reality in Suriname
Enough classes to be meaningful, but not too many to still be
distinguishable
More detail can be produced of specific areas
Clear definitions and link with RS but also field characteristic
Capitalize on all carried out activities and propose a compilation
with clear identification of discussion points
Stakeholders review to clear out discussion points
16