Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card
-
Upload
scottbaker -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card
-
8/8/2019 Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card
1/7
To meet a test indicatorfor grades3-8 and 10, atleast 75%ofstudents testedmustscoreproficientorhigher
on that test. Other indicator requirements are:11thgradeOhio GraduationTests,85%; AttendanceRate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%.
StateIndicators
2009-2010 School Year Report Card
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 85 percent
The state requirement is 93 percent
The state requirement is 90 percent
3rd Grade Achievement
1. Reading2. Mathematics
4th Grade Achievement3. Reading4. Mathematics
5th Grade Achievement5. Reading6. Mathematics7. Science
6th Grade Achievement8. Reading9. Mathematics
7th Grade Achievement10. Reading11. Mathematics
8th Grade Achievement12. Reading13. Mathematics14. Science
Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade)
15. Reading16. Mathematics17. Writing18. Science19. Social Studies
Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)
20. Reading21. Mathematics22. Writing23. Science24. Social Studies
Attendance Rate25. All Grades
2008-09 Graduation Rate26. District
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The six designations are Excellent with Distinction Excellent Effective Continuous Improvement Academic Watch Academic Emergency
Value-AddedAdequate Yearly Progress
PerformanceIndex
Indicators
The District Report Card for the2009-2010 school year shows theprogress districts have madebased on four measures of performance.
The combination of the fourmeasures is the basis forassigning state designations to districts, buildings andcommunity schools.
Your DistrictsDesignation: Number of StateIndicators
Met out of 26Performance
Index
StateIndicators PerformanceIndex
Value-AddedMeasure
Your District2009-2010
Similar Districts2009-2010
State2009-2010
Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Leve
On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov
Value-AddedMeasure
StateIndicators
DistrictImprovement(0-120 points)
AYP
*
**
Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a .
SimilarDistrictsare basedon comparingdemographic, socioeconomicand geographicfactors. Cumulativeresults forstudents whotook thetestsas 10thor 11th graders.***-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
97.9 %95.7 %97.6 %94.5 %96.3 %
96.2 %
93.1 %
IRN # 046110
Excellent withDistinction 26 104.2
Met
OK
Lakota Local School District5572 Princeton Rd, Liberty Township, OH 45011-9726 - Butler County
Current Superintendent: William M. Taylor (513) 874-5505
91.2 %86.9 %
88.5 %86.7 %
85.4 %83.9 %85.5 %
93.8 %91.7 %
92.3 %89.5 %
92.7 %85.6 %83.2 %
94.7 %91.2 %93.9 %87.3 %92.0 %
90.9 %87.8 %
78.4 %76.9 %
90.8 %88.0 %
81 %76.2 %
86.2 %83.5 %85.7 %
71.8 %67 %
69.9 %
84.1 %77.4 %
94.0 %90.3 %
80.2 %71.1 %
91.4 %86.6 %
80.9 %69.2 %64.8 %
92.2 %85.1 %82.7 %
83 %80.4 %84.1 %73 %
79.6 %
93.8 %92.9 %93.8 %88.6 %92.7 %
91.6 %89.2 %93.2 %85.1 %88.7 %
94.3 %
83 %
97.3 %96.8 %97.8 %95.2 %96.7 %
95.8 %
96.0 %
+ = above
-
8/8/2019 Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card
2/7
2
All students in the district for a full academic year are included in the results.
The StateIndicators are
based on stateassessments, as wellas on attendance andgraduation rates.To earn an indicator for Achievement orGraduation Tests, atleast75% of studentsmust reach proficientor above for the givenassessment.For the 11th grade OhioGraduationTestsindicators,a cumulative85%passagerate for eachassessmentis required.
StateIndicators
Your Districts Assessment Results Over Time
Cumulative results for students who took the tests as 10th or 11th graders.*
S t a t e S t a n
d a r d
- 7 5 %
Reading Mathematics
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
3rd Grade Achievement
07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10
88.4 88.1 91.2 87.6 89.4 86.9
--------------------------------------
S t a t e S t a n
d a r d
- 7 5 %
Reading Mathematics
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
4th Grade Achievement
07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10
92.1 89.9 88.5 84.9 87.9 86.7
--------------------------------------
S t a t e S t a n
d a r
d -
7 5 %
Reading Mathematics
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
Science
5th Grade Achievement
07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10
86.7 87.3 85.4 79.1 79.7 83.9 85.0 86.8 85.5
------------------------------------------------------
S t a t e S t a n
d a r d -
7 5 %
Reading Mathematics
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
6th Grade Achievement
07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10
9 2.8 93 .5 9 3. 8 90 .4 90 .9 9 1. 7
--------------------------------
S t a t e S t a n
d a r d -
7 5 %
Reading Mathematics
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
7th Grade Achievement
07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10
91.6 91.5 92.3 82.9 86.6 89.5
--------------------------------
S t a t e S t a n
d a r
d -
7 5 %
Reading Mathematics
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
Science
8th Grade Achievement
07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10
93.6 87.9 9 2.7 88.7 86.7 8 5.6 82.2 79.7 83.2
------------------------------------------------------
S t a t e S t a n d a r d -
7 5 %100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade)
Reading WritingMathematics Science SocialStudies
07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10
93.6 9 5.4 9 4.7 89.4 9 3.8 91.2 94.1 9 7.2 93.9 86.5 9 1.8 87.3 89.9 94.0 92.0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S t a t e S t a n d a r d -
8 5 %100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)
Reading WritingMathematics Science SocialStudies
*
07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10
97.0 97.7 97.9 95.3 9 6.4 95.7 97.7 9 8.0 97.6 94.4 9 3.9 9 4.5 95.5 96.5 96.3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lakota Local School District, Butler County
-
8/8/2019 Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card
3/7
Overall Composite Scores reflect grade level and overall composite
ratings for the 2009-2010 school year.
Value-Added Measure
Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
Reading
Mathematics
On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov
Your districtsValue-Added rating represents the progress yourdistrict has made with its students since last school year.In contrast, achievement scores represent students performance at apoint in time. A score of Above indicates greater than one year of
progress has been achieved; Met indicates one year of progress has beenachieved; Below indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved.
Value-AddedMeasure
-
+AboveExpected Growth
MetExpected Growth
BelowExpected Growth
=
=
=
Legend
Performance Index
Performance Level Across Grades3-8 and 10 for all Tested Subjects
(Includes every student enrolled inthe district for a full academic year)
X =WeightPercentage Points
Performance Index Calculationsfor the 2009-2010 School Year
Untested
Limited
Basic
Proficient
Accelerated
Advanced
X
X
X
X
X
X
=
=
=
=
=
=
The PerformanceIndex reflects theachievementofeverystudentenrolled for the fullacademic
year. The Performance Index is a
weighted average that includes all tested subjects and grades anduntested students.Thegreatestweight is given to advanced scores(1.2); the weights decrease for eachperformance level and a weight of zero is given to untested students.This results in a scale from 0 to 120points. The Performance Index can bcompared across years to showdistrict achievement trends.
PerformanceIndex
2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008
Performance Index Over Time
Your Districts Performance Index
0.2
3.0
7.8
27.1
27.5
34.4
0.9
4.7
27.1
30.3
41.3
104.2 103.6 102.9104.2
Lakota Local School District, Butler County
+- -
+ + + +
0.00.0
0.3
0.6
1.0
1.1
1.2
-
8/8/2019 Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card
4/7
4
Grades 3-8 and 10
Readingand
Mathematics
Adequate YearlyProgress
A l lS t u
d e n t s
P e r c e n
t P r o
f i c
i e n
t
P e r c e n
t T e s
t e d
E c o n o m
i c a l l y
D i s a d v
a n t a g e
d
A s i a n / P
a c i f i c
I s l a n d e
r
B l a c k ,
n o n - H i
s p a n i c
A m e r i c
a nI n d i a n
/ A l a s k a
N a t i v e
H i s p a n
i c
M u l t i -
R a c i a l
W h i t e ,
n o n - H i
s p a n i c
S t u d e n
t sw i t h
D i s a b i
l i t i e s
L i m i t e d
E n g l i s h
P r o f i c i
e n t
Reading
Mathematics
Reading
Mathematics
Graduation Rate*
Attendance Rate*
Legend
Not applicable.
NR
N/A
Met
Not Met
Not Required This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statisti-cally reliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.
This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.
This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
ReadingProficiency:
MathematicsProficiency:
ReadingParticipation:
MathematicsParticipation:
AttendanceRate:
AYP Determinatioby Indicator
GraduationRate:
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a federally required measure. Every schoolanddistrict must meet AYPgoals that are set for Readingand Mathematics
Proficiency and Participation, Attendance Rate, and GraduationRate. These goals are applied to ten student groups: All Students,Economically Disadvantaged Students, Asian/Pacific IslanderStudents, Black, non-Hispanic Students, American Indian/AlaskaNative Students, Hispanic Students, Multi-Racial Students, White,
non-Hispanic Students, Students with Disabilities (IEP), and Students withLimited English Proficiency (LEP). If any one of these groups does not meetAYP in Reading or Mathematics Proficiency, or in Participation, AttendanceRate, or Graduation Rate, then the school or district does not meet AYP.Not meeting AYP for consecutive years will have both federal and stateconsequences. Federal consequences could include a school or district beingidentified for improvement. State consequences could include a reductionin the states rating designation.
AYP
AYP Determinationby Subgroup
AYPDetermination
for Your District:
This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this years AYP goals.For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways:
1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor;4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results.
For non-test indicators, AYP can be met in one of three ways:
1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;3) making improvement over the previous year.
*The non-test indicators used for overall AYP (Attendance Rate and Graduation Rate)are evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.
2008-2009Graduation Rate Information
The disaggregated graduation rates of your district are provided forinformational purposes only andare notused for your AYPdetermination.
HispanicWhite,
non-HispanicLimited English
Proficient Multi-RacialStudents with
Disabilities
Black,non-Hispanic
Asian orPacific Islander
American Indian/ Alaska Native
Econ.Disadvtgd
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Lakota Local School District, Butler County
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
-- 89.7% 81.1% 85.7%
86.5% 70% 85.3% 89.8% >95%
-
8/8/2019 Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card
5/7
Under the federalNo Child Left BehindAct, states are
required to reportcertain data aboutschoolsandteachers.Data presentedhereare for reportingpurposes only andare not used in thecomputation of thestate designation fordistricts andschools.
-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies
ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies
ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies
ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies
ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies
Black,non-Hispanic
AmericanIndian/
Alaska Native
Asian orPacific
IslanderHispanic Multi-Racial
White,non-Hispanic
Non-DisabledStudents
Studentswith
DisabilitiesMigrant
Non-Econ.
Disadvtgd
Econ.Disadvtgd
LimitedEnglish
ProficientFemale Male
Your District's Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level
Percentage of Students Scoring Limited
Percentage of Students Scoring Basic
Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient
Percentage of Students Scoring Accelerated
Percentage of Students Scoring Advanced
State and Federally Required District Information
Number of Limited English Proficient StudentsExcluded from Accountability Calculations
All Schools inYour District
High-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*
Low-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*
Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelors Degree
Percentage of teachers with at least a Masters Degree
Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses not taught by highly qualified teachers
Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses taught by properly certified teachers
Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught byteachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure
*High-poverty schools arethoserankedin thetop quartilebasedon thepercentageof economicallydisadvantagedstudents.Low-poverty schoolsare those ranked in thebottomquartile based on thepercentageof economicallydisadvantaged students. A districtmay havebuildingsin bothquartiles, in justone quartileor in neitherquartile.
Federally Required School Teacher Information
-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
Average DailyStudent
Enrollment
Black,non-
Hispanic
AmericanIndian or
Alaska Native
Asian orPacific
IslanderHispanic Multi-Racial
White,non-
Hispanic
Studentswith
DisabilitiesMigrantEconomicallyDisadvantaged
LimitedEnglish
Proficient
Your Districts Students 2009-2010
35
17433 9.4% 0.1% 5.5% 3.3% 4.2% 77.5% 13.9% 5.4% 9.4% --
Lakota Local School District, Butler County
100.0
68.4
0.0
99.5
0.0
0.0
--
--
12.712.820.027.813.0
7.7--
7.7----
4.10.02.61.32.6
8.37.3
11.34.32.4
3.90.05.55.45.7
2.00.62.41.21.9
1.70.22.11.01.5
15.96.4
19.715.117.6
----------
1.90.32.41.31.8
9.63.6
11.88.19.6
2.30.53.71.92.6
10.29.1
13.15.89.1
3.61.03.72.42.9
15.4--
7.7----
3.53.96.9
11.00.0
12.19.8
18.127.617.1
10.25.6
14.919.9
5.7
4.74.06.59.63.8
4.23.36.7
10.13.7
22.728.426.337.223.1
----------
4.44.46.5
10.14.1
15.011.820.328.013.3
12.821.217.026.318.2
4.93.38.9
13.95.9
6.87.27.9
11.14.7
39.753.233.331.635.7
38.5--
30.8----
29.228.621.223.8
9.1
42.631.731.326.731.7
35.330.632.421.711.4
28.834.824.322.813.4
30.035.625.324.015.5
35.645.027.121.824.1
----------
29.035.024.322.714.1
40.046.233.131.131.3
40.542.430.832.124.2
28.932.726.226.119.3
32.139.824.821.613.4
23.032.117.220.018.8
15.4--
15.4----
32.163.622.225.118.2
24.948.813.624.119.5
26.258.317.025.314.3
32.459.222.728.817.7
32.760.123.028.918.1
13.07.38.4
11.214.8
----------
32.458.622.628.717.6
22.236.716.319.219.3
25.324.218.221.824.2
30.561.722.428.519.6
31.450.421.026.316.2
16.41.3
18.212.624.0
8.20.6
11.48.18.4
23.1--
38.5----
31.13.9
47.238.870.1
12.12.4
25.717.229.3
24.35.6
30.327.762.9
32.11.5
44.137.663.2
31.40.7
42.936.061.2
12.812.818.514.820.4
----------
32.31.7
44.337.362.4
13.31.8
18.613.626.5
11.23.0
21.014.124.2
33.41.9
38.829.552.6
26.11.6
42.638.662.9
0.0 -- 0.0
100.0
68.4
0.0
99.5
-
8/8/2019 Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card
6/7
6
Every school in SI has to create animprovement plan. If a school in SIreceives federal funds, it may have tooffer Public School Choice and/orSupplemental Educational Services.Being in SI for three or more yearsrequires more extensive correctiveactions and, eventually, restructuring.
Generally, a school will enter SchoolImprovement (SI) after missing AYP for two consecutive years, and it canexit SI only after meeting AYP for twoconsecutive years.
Name of the School & Years in Improvement
Name of Schools Identified for Improvement and Years in Improvement Status
Schools in School Improvement
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),oftenreferred toasThe Nations ReportCard, is theonly nationally representativeandcontinuingassessment that enables thecomparisionof performance in Ohio and other states in varioussubjectareas. Schoolsand studentswithineachstate are selectedrandomlytobea part of theassessment. Not all students inthe state or ina particular school take the assessment.Dataare reported atthe state level only,and there are noindividualstudent orevenschoolsummaryresults. Theassessmentsare conductedinmathematics, reading,science,writing, thearts, civics, economics, geography andU.S. history.
To view Ohios most recentNAEP results,
go to:
and search for key word NAEPhttp://education.ohio.gov
Freedom Elementary School 1 Heritage Elementary School 1
Lakota West High School 2
Lakota Local School District, Butler County
-
8/8/2019 Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card
7/7
1. If a district meets AYP in the current year, it can berated no lower than Continuous Improvement.
2. If a district does not meet AYP for three consecutive years and in the current year it does not meet AYP inmore than one student group, it can be rated no
higher than Continuous Improvement.3. In all other cases, AYP has no effect on the
preliminary designation.Thus, thepreliminary designationbecomes the final designation.
Once the preliminary designation is determined, Value-Added the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluated to determine the impact (if any) on the districts finaldesignation.
1. If your districts rating is restricted to ContinuousImprovement due to AYP, then Value-Added will have noimpact on the designation and the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.
2. If your district experiences above expected growth for atleast two consecutive years, your districts finaldesignation will increase by one designation.
3. If your district experiences below expected growth for atleast three consecutive years, your districts finaldesignation will decrease by one designation.
The preliminary designation results from identifying thehigher value between the percentage of indicators met by your district and your districts performance index. AYP then is evaluated to determine its effect on the preliminarydesignation. There are three ways in which AYP can affect the preliminary designation.
Determining Your District's Rating
Indicators Met Performance Index Score AYP Status Preliminary Designation94%-100% 100 to 120or
or
or
or
or
and
and
and
and
and
andand
Met or Not Met Excellent
75%-93.9%
0%-74.9%
50%-74.9%
31%-49.9 %
0%-30.9%
90 to 99.9
80 to 89.9
0 to 89.9
70 to 79.9
0 to 69.9
Met or Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Met
Effective
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
ContinuousImprovement
=
=
=
=
=
=
Preliminary Designation Value-Added Measure* Final Designation
Excellent
Effective
Continuous Improvement
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive yearsand
and
and
and
and
Excellent with Distinction
Effective
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive yearsBelow expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Excellent
Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement
Academic Watch
Effective
*In all other cases, including if your districts designation has been restricted to Continuous Improvement, then Value-Added will hno impact on the designation and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.
or
or
or
or
or
Determiningyourdistricts reportcard designationis a multi-stepprocess. Thefirst stepis todeterminea preliminary designation,whichisbasedonthe following components:1) thepercentageof indicators met,2) the performanceindexand 3)AYPdetermination
Lakota Local School District, Butler County