Lake Wells Potash Project Wetland Ecology Baseline Survey · 2020. 6. 16. · with many other...
Transcript of Lake Wells Potash Project Wetland Ecology Baseline Survey · 2020. 6. 16. · with many other...
November 2017
Final Report
Prepared for:
Australian Potash Limited
Lake Wells Potash Project
Wetland Ecology Baseline Survey
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
i
Report Version Prepared by Reviewed by Submitted to Client
Method Date
Draft Anton Mittra Stuart Halse Email 15 June 2017
Final Anton Mittra Stuart Halse Email 29 November 2017
BEC_AET_01_Lake Wells_Lake Ecology_FINAL28xi17.docx
This document has been prepared to the requirements of the Client and is for the use by the Client, its
agents, and Bennelongia Environmental Consultants. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property
associated with the document belongs to Bennelongia Environmental Consultants and may not be
reproduced without written permission of the Client or Bennelongia. No liability or responsibility is accepted
in respect of any use by a third party or for purposes other than for which the document was
commissioned. Bennelongia has not attempted to verify the accuracy and completeness of information
supplied by the Client. © Copyright 2015 Bennelongia Pty Ltd.
Bennelongia Pty Ltd
5 Bishop Street
Jolimont WA 6014
P: (08) 9285 8722
F: (08) 9285 8811
ABN: 55 124 110 167
Report Number: 295
Lake Wells Potash Project
Wetland Ecology Baseline Survey
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Australian Potash Limited proposes to develop the Lake Wells Potash Project (the Project) at Lake Wells
in Western Australia. The Project will involve extracting and concentrating potassium-rich brines in solar
evaporation ponds for the production of sulphate of potash. The construction of evaporation ponds is
the main potential threat to lake ecology at Lake Wells. This assessment provides baseline data on the
ecological values of wetlands within the Lake Wells system, including values for aquatic invertebrates,
diatoms, aquatic macrophytes and waterbirds.
Nine sites (six wet and three dry) in and around the Lake Wells system were sampled in March 2017.
Sites included very shallow hypersaline pools in saline playas, freshwater pools in claypans and dry
playas. Salinity (48–195,200 µS cm-1) ranged from fresh (claypan pools) to hypersaline (pools in main
saline playa) and water had mildly acidic to circumneutral pH. Sampling methods targeted aquatic
invertebrates (sweep sampling and hatching trials), diatoms (scrapes of benthic mats or dry sediment),
macrophytes and waterbirds (15 minute survey per site plus opportunistic sightings).
A total of 1,528 specimens of at least 64 invertebrate species were collected. Higher-order groups
included flatworms, rotifers, roundworms, crustaceans and insects. Crustaceans were the most diverse
group at order-level with seven orders (brine shrimp, clam shrimps, water fleas, shield shrimps, calanoid
copepods, cyclopoid copepods and seed shrimps) and were diverse at species-level (21 species). Insects
were the most diverse group at species-level, with 24 species of four orders (beetles, flies, true bugs,
and dragon- and damselflies). Lake Wells appears to have a rich aquatic invertebrate fauna compared
with many other inland saline lakes. Three species, the clam shrimp Eocyzicus sp. B01 and the ostracods
Bennelongia nr koendersae and Bennelongia sp. BOS833 (nimala lineage) are currently known only from
Lake Wells, although all three appear to occur outside the Project impact area and expected to be more
widely distributed than the Lake Wells system alone. The other species recorded are all widespread.
A total of 707 diatom specimens of 55 species were collected. There was not a clear inverse relationship
between species richness and salinity, as is commonly observed for diatom assemblages. Samples from
both wet and dry sites yielded relatively high numbers of species. Results indicate that Lake Wells
harbours a comparatively rich assemblage of diatoms. One species identified only to genus is known
only from within the Project impact area but it is considered certain to occur more widely.
Two species of aquatic macrophyte, Ruppia sp. and Marsilea sp., were present during survey. As is typical
of saline inland lakes, abundance and diversity of macrophytes were low.
Five waterbird and shorebird species (grey teal, white-necked heron, red-capped plover, black-tailed
native-hen and Australian shelduck) were recorded in March and October 2017 (the latter period being
a related stygofauna survey). When combined with results from a two-phase vertebrate survey, 16
species of waterbird and shorebird have been recorded at Lake Wells. The majority of species were seen
at fresher claypans surrounding the main network of saline playas. The recorded species are widespread
and most are common at arid zone saline lakes and fresher wetlands. It is likely that a higher abundance
and diversity of waterbirds utilises Lake Wells shortly after major rainfall events.
Rather than hosting many rare or endemic species, the principal ecological value of Lake Wells is its
function as a wetland that episodically hosts an abundant and speciose biota.
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
iii
CONTENTS
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. ii
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1
2. Background .......................................................................................................................... 1
2.1. Regional Context ........................................................................................................... 1
2.2. Sampling Dry Wetlands ................................................................................................. 4
3. Methods ................................................................................................................................ 4
3.1. Sampling Effort ............................................................................................................... 4
3.2. Aquatic Invertebrates and Hatching Trials ................................................................. 4
3.3. Diatoms ........................................................................................................................... 5
3.4. Avifauna .......................................................................................................................... 5
3.5. Aquatic Vegetation ...................................................................................................... 7
3.6. Personnel ......................................................................................................................... 7
4. Results and Discussion ......................................................................................................... 7
4.1. Aquatic Invertebrates and Hatching Trials ................................................................. 7
4.1.1. Patterns in Aquatic Invertebrate Communities ................................................. 11
4.1.2. Species Distributions ............................................................................................... 12
4.2. Diatoms ......................................................................................................................... 13
4.3. Aquatic Vegetation .................................................................................................... 14
4.4. Avifauna ........................................................................................................................ 14
5. Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 15
6. References .......................................................................................................................... 16
7. Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 18
Appendix 1. ............................................................................................................................ 19
Appendix 2. Distribution of diatom species at Lake Wells. .............................................. 20
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of the Lake Wells Potash Project. .......................................................... 2
Figure 2. Conceptual site layout and development envelopes (off-playa and on-
playa) of the Project (provided by MBS Environmental). .................................................. 3
Figure 3. Location of sampling sites in and around Lake Wells in March 2017. .............. 6
Figure 4. Frequency of occurrence of aquatic invertebrate species across sampling
sites in and around Lake Wells. ............................................................................................ 11
LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Regional climate data for the study area. ............................................................ 1
Table 2. Summary of sampling effort, water chemistry and sampling methods at
each wetland site at Lake Wells in March 2017. ................................................................. 5
Table 3. Aquatic and semi-aquatic invertebrates recorded in surface water
sampling at Lake Wells. ........................................................................................................... 8
Table 4. Comparison of aquatic invertebrate species richness at inland Australian
lakes. ........................................................................................................................................ 11
Table 5. Summary of diatom abundance and richness across sampling sites at Lake
Wells. ........................................................................................................................................ 13
Table 6. Distribution of ecological indicator species of diatom in and around Lake
Wells. ........................................................................................................................................ 13
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
iv
Table 7. Waterbirds observed during survey at Lake Wells by Bennelongia. ................ 14
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
1
1. INTRODUCTION Australian Potash Limited proposes to develop the Lake Wells Potash Project (the Project) at Lake Wells,
located approximately 160 km northeast of Laverton in the northeastern Yilgarn region of Western
Australia (Figure 1). The Project will involve the abstraction of potassium-rich saline groundwater that
underlies the Lake Wells system via bores. This groundwater will be fed into surrounding pans, which
will act as evaporation ponds and then finally into a harvest pond, where sulphate of potash (K2SO4), will
be collected. This is an important plant fertiliser. The construction and operation of evaporation ponds
is a potential threat to aquatic ecology at Lake Wells. Additional infrastructure for the Project is likely to
include processing facilities, salt storage areas, access and haul roads, an airstrip, accommodation and
administration facilities, utility supplies and an associated borefield to supply processing water (Figure
2.)
This report provides results of a baseline field survey to determine the ecological and conservation values
of wetland-dependent fauna and flora at Lake Wells. The specific aims of the study were to document:
• The composition of aquatic invertebrate fauna in and around Lake Wells;
• The composition of the diatom (benthic microalgae) community in and around Lake Wells;
• The aquatic macrophyte species present at the time of survey; and
• The waterbird species using the wetland system.
2. BACKGROUND
2.1. Regional Context The Project is located among the network of saline playas and clay pans forming the Lake Wells system
on the northeastern margin of the Yilgarn Craton of Western Australia and in the northern section of
the Great Victoria Desert Shield sub-bioregion (GVD1; Barton and Cowan 2001).
From a geological perspective, the Lake Wells area is characterised by Quaternary aeolian deposits,
depositional sheet wash and playa lake deposits. Basement rocks include Archaean granitic rocks rich in
potassic and calcic feldspar, along with greenstone rocks including basalt, gabbro, felsic schists and
chert-shale-BIF units. Historical and recent drilling programs have revealed a variable regolith horizon
consisting of surficial or near-surface evaporite and sand/silt, silcrete, common lake clays with some well
sorted sand units and puggy lacustrine clays with minor sand/silt.
Local vegetation is characterised by samphire and saltbush steppes associated with the salt lake system,
low mulga communities on hills and plains, spinifex grasslands on aeolian sand plains and Eremophila
shrubland and mulga scrub on low ranges. The climate is arid with the majority of total annual rainfall
(ca. 300 mm) occurring in summer (Table 1). A significant volume of rainfall was received in the vicinity
of Lake Wells in the weeks prior to field survey in March 2017. Total rainfall of 177.2 and 126.4 mm in
January and 98.4 and 34.5 mm occurred in January and February, respectively, at Laverton Aero, 160 km
to the south, and Delita Downs, 60 km to the northwest (BOM 2017). This rain resulted in localised
flooding and pooling in the playas and claypans at Lake Wells but did not inundate the whole system.
Table 1. Regional climate data for the study area.
Temperature data are from Laverton Aero (BOM station 12305) and rainfall data are from Delita Downs (BOM station
13035). Red and blue text denote maximum and minimum average monthly values, respectively.
Since Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Mean max. temp. (°C) 1991 35.5 33.8 30.4 26.7 22.2 18.3 18.3 20.8 24.5 28.6 31.3 33.8 27.0
Mean min. temp. (°C) 1991 21.5 20.7 18.2 14.9 10.5 7.0 5.9 7.2 10.4 14.3 17.1 19.7 14.0
Mean rainfall (mm) 1992 50.3 59.1 41.2 36.1 15.8 15.9 8.2 9.0 4.1 12.4 23.9 24.7 297.4
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
2
Figure 1. Location of the Lake Wells Potash Project. Locations of calcretes are derived from the Geological Survey of Western Australia (GSWA).
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
3
Figure 2. Conceptual site layout and development envelopes (off-playa and on-playa) of the Project (provided by MBS Environmental).
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
4
2.2. Sampling Dry Wetlands Sampling surface water in ephemeral wetlands is not always practical because of sporadic, unpredictable
flow regimes and logistical constraints. This is the case at Lake Wells, which is rarely inundated due to
low rainfall and high rates of evaporation. However, some aquatic invertebrates survive adverse
environmental conditions through various mechanisms of dormancy, reactivating with the onset of
favourable conditions (Radzikowski 2013). This means hatching trials, in which dry wetland sediments
are rehydrated under laboratory conditions to encourage hatching of drought-resistant eggs and spores,
provide an alternative method of assessing aquatic invertebrate communities. Hatching trials enable
monitoring to continue during periods when surface water is absent, although it provides results for
only part of the community (some crustacean groups and rotifers, in particular).
A number of hatching trials have been undertaken in arid regions of Western Australia to inform
environmental approval processes for mining developments or as part of ecological monitoring
programs (e.g. Bennelongia 2012, 2016; Rodman et al. 2016). The success of these trials has varied owing
to the technical difficulties of simulating complex natural conditions and encouraging the activation and
growth of dormant stages in the laboratory (see Cáceres and Schwalbach 2001). Although improved
techniques may lead to diverse suites of fauna being recorded in laboratory hatching trials, it is noted
that in situ sampling of aquatic fauna during inundation is likely to yield a more thorough representation
of actual diversity.
3. METHODS
3.1. Sampling Effort Nine wetland sites in and around the Lake Wells system were sampled for aquatic biota between 4 and
7 March 2017. Sites included very shallow hypersaline pools in saline playas, freshwater pools in claypans
and dry playas. Sites were classified as ‘internal’, ‘peripheral’ or ‘external’ based on their position relative
to the proposed evaporative pond network (Table 2; Figure 3). Internal sites are all hypersaline playa
sites that will be included within the evaporative pond network. The peripheral site LW5 is in a small
hypersaline playa outside the proposed pond system but it is sufficiently close to the pond system that
it is likely to experience additional salinity. The external LW7 is a hypersaline playa site that will not be
affected by the proposed evaporative ponds, while the other external sites are in surrounding swales
and can be regarded as fresh or hyposaline pans.
The aquatic invertebrate fauna at dry sites (LW7, 8, 9) was sampled by collecting lake sediments for
laboratory hatching trials (Section 3.2). In situ water quality parameters (temperature, pH and electrical
conductance) were measured at wet sites using a calibrated TPS WP-81 field meter. A summary of
sampling effort is provided in Table 2. Site locations are shown in Figure 3 and full site descriptions and
photographs are given in Appendix 1.
3.2. Aquatic Invertebrates and Hatching Trials At sites holding surface water, aquatic invertebrates were collected in situ by kick-sweep sampling
through all available habitat types with pond nets. Two mesh sizes (50 µm and 250 µm) were used to
optimise sampling efficiency with the objective of collecting all species present at each site. Additional
targeted collections were made by hand, pipette or pond net for scarce, conspicuous or fast-moving
taxa. Observations of perished aquatic invertebrates were made at dry sites and on the outskirts of wet
sites. These observations were included in final estimates of richness (number of species), but did not
contribute to abundance values. Samples were preserved in ethanol, refrigerated and freighted to the
laboratory where they were sorted under dissecting microscopes and identified using available
taxonomic keys.
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
5
Table 2. Summary of sampling effort, water chemistry and sampling methods at each wetland site at
Lake Wells in March 2017. Sites for which no water chemistry data are presented were dry at the time of survey.
Site Latitude Longitude Position Description Temp. (°C) pH EC
(µS/cm)
Depth
(mm) Invertebrates
LW1 -27.2678 123.0301 Internal
Hypersaline
film in saline
playa
26.6 6.49 195,200 5 In situ
LW2 -27.2733 123.0154 Internal
Hypersaline
film in saline
playa
30.2 6.89 176,200 30 In situ
LW3 -27.2375 123.2444 External Freshwater
claypan pool 27.7 6.78 390 150 In situ
LW4 -27.2477 123.2102 External Brackish
claypan pool 28.0 7.44 2,990 100 In situ
LW5 -27.2653 122.9499 Periphery Saline claypan
pool 20.3 7.35 5,820 300 In situ
LW6 -27.2444 122.9837 Internal Dry saline
playa - - - - Hatching trial
LW7 -27.2058 123.0381 External Dry claypan - - - - Hatching trial
LW8 -27.3282 122.9251 External Freshwater
claypan pool 20.3 6.27 48 100 In situ
LW9 -27.2538 123.0103 Internal Dry saline
playa - - - - Hatching trial
Where surface water was absent, hatching trials were conducted to document aquatic invertebrate
communities. The top 1–2 cm of sediment, including salt crust and underlying soil, was collected from
multiple spots within each site and stored into plastic takeaway containers with lids perforated to allow
airflow. Samples within each site were predominantly taken from depressions and potential pools to
maximise the likelihood of capturing an adequate representation of the resting fauna present. In the
laboratory, approximately 1 tbsp of sediment from each sample was placed in an aluminium tray and
rehydrated with approximately 1 L of deionised water. Trays were kept under an east-facing window
(approximately 12.2–12.3 h light per day) and equipped with air stones for aeration. Electrical
conductance (EC) was measured in each container after 24 hours and water added as necessary to
formulate an environment that would encourage hatching in a range of species, with the rationale that
excessive salinity may preclude hatching in some fauna. Water was topped up every 1–2 days to account
for evaporation and to maintain constant salinity. Hatching and development of animals was monitored
daily by pipetting small volumes of water, as well as any visible animals, into petri dishes and examining
the water and animals under a microscope. Trays were monitored for approximately two weeks or until
additional hatchings ceased. Animals in each tray were then counted, preserved in ethanol and identified
to species-level where possible.
3.3. Diatoms Diatoms were sampled at each site by extracting the topmost benthic layer with a pipette (wet sites) or
by scraping approximately 0.25 teaspoons of lake sediment (dry sites). The uppermost portion of salt
crust was removed prior to sampling at dry sites. Samples were preserved in ethanol, refrigerated and
freighted to Professor Peter Gell at Federation University, Victoria, for sorting and identification.
3.4. Avifauna Surveys for waterbirds and shorebirds were undertaken at each sampling site using binoculars and
spotting scopes. Fifteen minutes were allocated to observations at each site and additional opportunistic
sightings made while other components of the biota, as well as during a stygofauna field trip in October
2017. Results from a related vertebrate fauna survey at Lake Wells (Harewood 2017) were also included.
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
6
Figure 3. Location of sampling sites in and around Lake Wells in March 2017.
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
7
3.5. Aquatic Vegetation Specimens of aquatic macrophyte species present were collected by hand from wet sites (and from dry
sites where possible), preserved in ethanol or by pressing and identified using keys in Sainty and Jacobs
(1994).
3.6. Personnel Fieldwork was completed by Michael Curran and Anton Mittra. Hatching trials were run by Anton Mittra.
Sorting of aquatic invertebrates was done by Jane McRae and identification by Jane McRae and Stuart
Halse. Maps were compiled by Mike Scanlon and reporting was done by Anton Mittra.
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1. Aquatic Invertebrates and Hatching Trials Aquatic invertebrate sampling yielded 1,528 specimens from at least 64 species (Table 3). Actual species
richness is likely to exceed estimated richness because some taxa (e.g. Nematoda sp.) could not
identified to species-level and may represent several species. To avoid artificial inflation, higher-order
identifications were not included in final estimates of species-richness unless they belonged to otherwise
unrecorded taxonomic units.
With the exception of the terrestrial salt lake tiger beetle Megacephalini sp. (one individual at LW5), all
recorded species are aquatic. Megacephalini sp. is included in this report because of its potential, but
uncertain, conservation significance. The systematics of the carabid tribe Megacephalini is under
ongoing review and many species are salt lake specialists that appear to be range restricted (N. Guthrie,
pers. comm. October 2017; López-López et al. 2016). Recent studies have revealed considerable cryptic
diversity (McCairns et al. 1997; Sumlin 1997; López-López et al. 2016). Genetic work would be required
to determine the identity of the specimen from Lake Wells.
Hatching trials contributed only a small amount to documenting the overall aquatic invertebrate
abundance and richness at Lake Wells, with a total of 61 animals of eight species being recorded in
sediment samples from three sites (LW1, LW7 and LW9). Species of rotifer, nematode, cladoceran and
ostracod hatched. Two species, the rotifer Bdelloidea sp. 2:2 and the cladoceran Alona rigidicaudis s.l.,
were only recorded in hatching trials.
Major higher-level groups that were recorded included flatworms (Platyhelminthes: Turbellaria), rotifers
(Rotifera), roundworms (Nematoda), crustaceans (Crustacea) and insects (Insecta). Crustaceans were the
most diverse group at the rank of order, with seven orders recorded: brine shrimp (Anostraca), clam
shrimp (Conchostraca), water fleas (Diplostraca: Cladocera), shield shrimp (Notostraca), calanoid
copepods (Calanoida), cyclopoid copepods (Cyclopoida) and seed shrimp (Ostracoda). Crustacea were
considerably diverse at species level, with at least 21 species recorded. However, insects were the most
speciose group with 24 species belonging to four orders. The most abundant taxa were seed shrimps
(525 specimens across eight sites); larvae of the non-biting midge Procladius (Procaldius) paludicola
(Chironomidae; 119 specimens across four sites); larvae of the biting midge Monohelea sp.
(Ceratopogonidae; 102 specimens across four sites); and the diving beetle Allodessus bistrigatus
(Dytiscidae; 72 specimens across two sites). Twelve species were recorded as singletons (Table 3).
Although the current survey of Lake Wells is unlikely to have captured all aquatic invertebrate species
that use the system during flooding, the species collected probably provide a reasonably complete
characterisation of the aquatic invertebrate community at Lake Wells. It is a community with a species
richness towards the higher end of the documented spectrum of richness at inland Australian salt lakes
Table 4). The high richness is largely attributable to the inclusion of a number of substantial ephemeral
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
8
Table 3. Aquatic and semi-aquatic invertebrates recorded in surface water sampling at Lake Wells. Int =internal saline site within proposed evaporative ponds; Peri = peripheral saline site likely outside ponds but likely to be impacted by higher salinity; Ext = external relatively fresh site away from
ponds..
Values are absolute abundance. Higher-order identifications denoted by ‘*’ were not included in final estimates of richness. Presence of a species based on visual observations of perished animals is
denoted by ‘#’.
Higher Classification Lowest Identification
Site
Total Abundance Int Int Ext Ext Peri Int Ext Ext Int
LW1 LW2 LW3 LW4 LW5 LW6 LW7 LW8 LW9
Platyhelminthes
Turbellaria Turbellaria sp. 2 10 12
Rotifera
Eurotatoria
Bdelloidea Bdelloidea sp. 2:2 10 5 15
Monogononta
Flosculariacea
Filiniidae Filinia longiseta 10 10
Flosculariidae Flosculariidae sp. 10 10
Testudinellidae Testudinella patina 50 50
Ploima
Asplanchnidae Asplanchna sieboldii 50 50
Brachionidae Brachionus bidentatus 5 5
Brachionus ibericus 1 1
Brachionus lyratus 50 50
Brachionus plicatilis s.l. 2 2
Brachionus rotundiformis 2 2 4
Dicranophoridae Dicranophorus grandis 1 1
Lecanidae Lecane bulla 1 1
Lecane curvicornis 1 1
Lepadellidae Colurella sp. 1 1
Synchaetidae Polyarthra dolichoptera 3 3
Trichocercidae Trichocerca rattus 2 2
Trichocerca ruttneri 2 2
Nematoda Nematoda sp. 1 2 10 2 1 5 21
Arthropoda
Crustacea
Branchiopoda
Anostraca
Branchiopodidae Parartemia laticaudata 17 17
Conchostraca
Cyzicidae Eocyzicus sp. B01 2 2
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
9
Higher Classification Lowest Identification
Site
Total Abundance Int Int Ext Ext Peri Int Ext Ext Int
LW1 LW2 LW3 LW4 LW5 LW6 LW7 LW8 LW9
Conchostraca sp. unident.* 1 1 # 2
Diplostraca
Chydoridae Alona rigidicaudis s.l. 1 1
Ovalona pulchella 25 25
Macrothricidae Macrothrix breviseta 40 1 17 58
Moinidae Moina micrura s.l. 24 24
Neothricidae Neothrix cf. armata (SAP) 2 2
Notostraca
Triopsidae Triops australiensis australiensis # 4 # # # 4
Maxillopoda
Calanoida
Centropagidae Boeckella triarticulata 40 2 42
Calamoecia ampulla var. P1 (PSW) 15 15
Cyclopoida
Cyclopidae Apocyclops dengizicus 3 10 13
Mesocyclops brooksi 50 50
Mesocyclops sp.* 1 1
Ostracoda
Cyprididae `Trilocypris horwitzi` ms 18 100 100 1 1 220
Bennelongia sp. BOS833 (nimala lineage) 5 5
Bennelongia nr koendersae 100 1 101
Bennelongia sp.* 1 1
Cypretta sp. BOS822 35 3 38
Cypretta sp. BOS829 50 50
Cyprinotus kimberleyensis 4 20 24
Cyprinotus sp. BOS830 1 1
Ilyodromus sp. BOS821 35 5 40
Ilyocyprididae Ilyocypris australiensis (Cue form sensu De Deckker) 40 5 45
Hexapoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Carabidae Megacephalini sp. (salt lake floor species) 1 1
Dytiscidae Allodessus bistrigatus 48 24 72
Eretes australis 1 12 13
Hydroglyphus grammopterus 21 3 24
Hydroglyphus orthogrammus 1 1
Sternopriscus multimaculatus 1 1
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
10
Higher Classification Lowest Identification
Site
Total Abundance Int Int Ext Ext Peri Int Ext Ext Int
LW1 LW2 LW3 LW4 LW5 LW6 LW7 LW8 LW9
Hydrophilidae Berosus sp. 1 1
Enochrus (Methydrus) elongatulus 8 8
Diptera
Ceratopogonidae Monohelea sp. 65 14 2 21 102
Chironomidae Cryptochironomus griseidorsum 3 3
Dicrotendipes `CA1` Pilbara type 2 (PSW) 1 1
Polypedilum (Polypedilum) nubifer 1 1 2
Polypedilum sp.* 2 2
Procladius (Procladius) paludicola 33 15 50 21 119
Tanytarsus fuscithorax/semibarbitarsus 40 40
Culicidae Anopheles annulipes s.l. 1 5 6
Hemiptera
Corixidae Agraptocorixa parvipunctata 3 3
Agraptocorixa sp.* 13 13
Notonectidae Anisops sp.* 8 8
Anisops thienemanni 5 5
Odonata
Aeshnidae Anax papuensis 3 3
Coenagrionidae Ischnura aurora aurora 10 10
Xanthagrion erythroneurum 29 29
Hemicorduliidae Hemicordulia tau 12 1 13
Lestidae Austrolestes aridus 7 7
Austrolestes sp.* 1 1
Libellulidae Diplacodes bipunctata 1 7 8
Pantala flavescens 10 10
Total abundance 92 138 362 429 288 - 45 163 11 1528
Total no. of species 8 7 24 18 25 1 7 13 3 62
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
11
Table 4. Comparison of aquatic invertebrate species richness at inland Australian lakes. Overall richness combines records within the main saline playa with surrounding claypans.
System Location Overall
richness
Saline
playa
richness
Salinity
(µS cm-1) Sites Samples
Lake Disappointment1 Pilbara, WA 195 14 66-99,300 31 52
Lake Carey2 Goldfields, WA 107 10 313-83,300 31 66
Lake Wells Goldfields, WA 64 10 48–195,200 9 9
Lake Torrens3 SA 27 27 20-391 5 25
Lake Eyre4 SA 17 17 39-427 1 15
Lake Weelarrana5 Pilbara, WA 14 14 59 1 1
Lake Cowan6 Wheatbelt, WA 7 6 184,000–234,000 4 4
Lake Way7 Goldfields, WA 3 3 Dry (hatching trial) 6 18 1Bennelongia 2017 2Timms et al. 2006; 3Williams et al. 1998; 4Williams and Kokkinn 1988; 5Pinder et al. 2010; 6Bennelongia 2016; 7Bennelongia 2016c.
pools in the sampling program, in addition to the two sites within the main network of the saline playa
where a remnant film of water remained (Table 2; Figure 3). When only the internal sites are considered,
richness within Lake Wells (10) is exceeded by Lake Torrens, Lake Eyre and Lake Weelarrana, which were
much fresher than Lake Wells and were sampled more intensively (Table 4). The species richness of the
main saline playa at Lake Wells is typical of large saline playa with that salinity level (approximately
180,000 µS cm-1) (see Pinder et al. 2004)
4.1.1. Patterns in Aquatic Invertebrate Communities
Species richness at individual sites ranged from one species at the dry internal, hypersaline site LW6,
which was sampled by hatching trial, to at least 24 species at the fresher subsaline site LW4 and
hyposaline site LW5 (Table 3). Salinity categories of Beadle (1943) are used.
The occurrence of species in the Lake Wells system exhibits considerable spatial heterogeneity, with 47
species (78.3%) recorded at single sites, only four species (6.67%) recorded at four sites or more and no
species recorded at more than seven sites (Figure 4). It should be recognised, however, that this hetero-
Figure 4. Frequency of occurrence of aquatic invertebrate species across sampling sites in and around
Lake Wells.
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
12
geneity was probably somewhat accentuated by survey conditions and the range of wetland types. Dry
sites yielded low species richness (one, three and six species at LW6, LW7 and LW9 respectively) in
hatching trials, although when flooded these sites probably have richness that is comparable to other
similar sites. Use of hatching trials to estimate the actual diversity species richness of wetlands (or even
relative richness) provides valuable data when sites are dry but the results are inconsistent and
underestimate richness. Groups, such as insects, that do not produce resting stages are not recorded
and even some crustacean groups hatch poorly.
Inland, ephemeral saline playas in Western Australia are typically considered to host relatively
depauperate invertebrate faunas (Table 4). Consistent with this trend, only 1-9 species were recorded at
sites within the saline playas at Lake Wells (i.e. those within the main salt lake system - LW1, LW2, LW6
and LW9). The saline playa site LW7, which is outside the proposed evaporative ponds, yielded a similar
number of species. These sites were typical of saline playa pools: shallow depressions on uniformly flat
areas, with saline to hypersaline water quality and low habitat diversity. In contrast, the deeper (100–300
mm), fresher (390–5,820 µS cm-1) sites LW3, LW4 and LW5, which had greater habitat diversity, including
debris, organic matter and macrophyte cover, hosted richer invertebrate assemblages (18–25 species)
(Table 2; Appendix 1).
4.1.2. Species Distributions Most of the aquatic invertebrate species collected are widespread and common. Some species are
endemic to central and north-western Australia, while others have Australia-wide or cosmopolitan
distributions. Three species (Eocyzicus sp. B01, Bennelongia nr koendersae, Bennelongia sp. BOS833
[nimala lineage]) have probably been recorded to date only at Lake Wells.
The clam shrimp Eocyzicus sp. B01 was recorded from the peripheral site LW5, while additional higher-
order clam shrimps (Conchostraca sp. unident.) that were too immature to identify to species level were
collected at LW3, LW4 and LW7 (the latter were visual observations of perished animals). Salinity at these
sites was variable (390–5,820 µS cm-1; LW7 was dry). All of these sites occur in playas or claypans outside
the areas proposed for the development of evaporation ponds. Two species of this genus are currently
formally described, however genetic work has shown that at least eleven distinct genetic lineages, some
of which may contain multiple species, occur in Australia. Eocyzicus sp. B01 is a new species, although it
may possibly correspond with a previously collected genetic lineage. Some Eocyzicus species are likely
to have restricted distributions (Schwentner et al. 2013). The nearest records of Eocyzicus are from Lake
Carey, approximately 200 km south and these animals are considered to belong to a different species
from those at Lake Wells (B. Timms, pers. comm.). It is expected that Eocyzicus sp. B01 occupies
ephemeral pools throughout the Lake Wells system and may be more widely distributed.
The ostracod Bennelongia nr koendersae appears to be a new species known only from current records
at Lake Wells. Other species in the genus have ranges that vary from being confined to isolated rock
outcrop pools to being Australia-wide in the case of Bennelongia dedeckkeri. Considering the extensive
ranges of most surface water ostracods, it is likely that Bennelongia nr koendersae, which belongs to the
nimala lineage of Bennelongia species, is at least moderately widespread. This lineage contains five
described species in the Pilbara and Murchison-Gascoyne (Martens et al. 2015). All species have known
linear ranges of more than 100 km and it is expected that Bennelongia nr koendersae occurs in the parts
of the Lake Wells system with suitable salinity, as well as more widely in the surrounding region. It was
collected at LW4, which is outside the areas proposed for the development of evaporation ponds.
The ostracod Bennelongia sp. BOS833 (nimala lineage) is also likely to be a new species. As with
Bennelongia nr koendersae, it is expected that Bennelongia sp. BOS833 (nimala lineage) occurs in the
parts of the Lake Wells system with suitable salinity, as well as more widely in the surrounding region. It
was recorded at LW3, which is outside the areas proposed for the development of evaporation ponds.
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
13
4.2. Diatoms A total of 707 diatom specimens of 55 species were recorded across the nine sampling sites in the Lake
Wells system (Table 5; Appendix 2). All but three taxa (Chaetaceros sp., Nitzschia cf. vasta, Seminavis sp.)
could be assigned to described or figured species (e.g. Nitzschia cf. hantzschiana) and the affinity of
Nitzschia cf. vasta is clear. All the described species are relatively widespread. Seminavis sp. is known
only from the Project impact area at site LW1 but the distribution pattern of the other diatom species it
is likely to be more widespread than the Lake Wells system (and certainly to occur beyond the Project
impact area).
The number of species at individual sites ranged from three species at LW7 to 21 at LW4. Somewhat
surprisingly, there was not a clear inverse relationship between richness and salinity as is commonly
observed for diatom assemblages and 37 species were recorded in the main saline playa network, 17
species were recorded from intermediate sites and 34 species were recorded at sites external to the main
network.
Lake Wells supports a comparatively rich assemblage of diatom species. Lakes in the Wheatbelt of
Western Australia have yielded 1–24 species (51 sites, ca. 203–241,000 µS cm-1; Taukulis and John 2006),
while 33 taxa were recorded at Lake Eyre (ca. 39,100–391,000 µS cm-1 when wet; Blinn 1991). Other large
salt lakes in inland north-western Australia have been sampled via hatching trials that have yielded
substantially fewer species with, for example, seven species recorded at Lake Austin (Rodman et al. 2016)
and 13 species at Lake Way near Wiluna (Bennelongia 2016a).
A range of ecological indicator species were recorded (Table 6; Appendix 1), including nine acidophiles,
five aerophiles species (requiring frequent wetting and drying cycles), six nitrophiles and seven
halophiles. The distribution of ecological indicator species generally reflected known habitat
characteristics of the waterbodies at Lake Wells, with higher numbers of halophiles and aerophiles within
the main saline playa indicating higher salinity and less inundation.
Table 5. Summary of diatom abundance and richness across sampling sites at Lake Wells.
Site EC (µS cm-1) Total Abundance Total No. of Species
LW1 195,200 203 17
LW2 176,200 11 8
LW3 390 72 13
LW4 2,990 145 21
LW5 5,820 65 17
LW6 dry 103 17
LW7 dry 29 3
LW8 48 41 11
LW9 dry 38 12
Total 707 55
Table 6. Distribution of ecological indicator species of diatom in and around Lake Wells.
Ecology Site Position
Internal Intermediate External
Acidophile 7 2 6
Aerophile 4 2 3
Nitrophile 3 1 3
Halophile 6 5 3
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
14
4.3. Aquatic Vegetation Two macrophytes, Ruppia sp. and Marsilea sp., were collected. It was not possible to identify either taxon
to species level because of the absence of the fruiting bodies that are required for species identification.
The observed abundance of macrophytes was also low, which is typical of inland saline lake systems.
Ruppia is a widespread genus of perennial aquatic herb. The genus is native but not endemic to
Australia. Four Australian species are recognised (Jacobs and Brock 1982), all but one of which have been
recorded in arid inland Western Australia (Ruppia maritima, Ruppia megacarpa and Ruppia polycarpa).
The fourth species, Ruppia turbosa, is seemingly confined to coastal and inland-southwestern waters.
Ruppia species occur in fresh to hypersaline waters and are frequently recorded in salt lake assessments,
including hatching trials (Rodman et al. 2016). In the current study, Ruppia sp. was recorded at LW2 and
also at LW7 in hatching trials. It is likely to also occur at other sites and throughout the Lake Wells
system.
Marsilea is a widespread but relatively uncommon native aquatic fern with clover-shaped leaves (Sainty
and Jacobs 1994). Seven species occur in Australia, four of which have been recorded in inland Western
Australia (Marsilea drummondii, Marsilea exarata, Marsilea hirsuta and Marsilea mutica). During the
current survey Marsilea sp. was recorded at the small, muddy, freshwater claypan at LW8.
4.4. Avifauna Five species of waterbird or shorebird were observed at three sites during survey in March 2017 and
October 2017 (Table 7). The low number of sightings reflects conditions at the time of survey, with most
saline playas being dry or covered in only a thin film of water. Species present during survey were grey
teal, white-necked heron, red-capped plover, black-tailed native-hen and Australian shelduck. All
observed species occur across Australia, are common at ephemeral inland lakes and have secure
conservation status.
Table 7. Waterbirds observed during survey at Lake Wells by Bennelongia.
Species Common Name Sites (abundance) Comments
Anas gracilis Grey teal LW5 (5) Foraging/swimming on saline pool
Ardea pacifica White-necked heron LW5 (1)* Foraging in fresh claypan pool
Charadrius ruficapillus Red-capped plover LW1 (2), LW5 (15) Foraging at edges of pools and
amongst fringing samphire
Gallinula ventralis Black-tailed native-hen LW3 (3)* Foraging in fresh claypan pool
Tadorna tadornoides Australian shelduck LW5 (2) Foraging/swimming on saline pool
*Recorded in October 2017 during stygofauna survey.
An independent two-phase fauna survey by Harewood (2017) recorded a further eleven species of
waterbird and shorebird including chestnut teal Anas castanea, Australian wood duck Chenonetta jubata,
black swan Cygnus atratus, pink-eared duck Malacorhynchus membranaceous, hoary-headed grebe
Poliocephalus poliocephalus, white-faced heron Ardea novaehollandiae, marsh sandpiper Tringa
stagnatilis, black-winged stilt Himantopus himantopus, red-knecked avocet Recurvirostra
novaehollandiae, red-kneed dotterel Erythrogonys cinctus and banded lapwing Vanellus tricolor. The
total number of waterbird and shorebird species recorded at Lake Wells by Bennelongia and Harewood
(2017) is 16. To the north of Lake Wells, the Lake Carnegie System is recognised as a wetland of national
significance due to its importance as a breeding site for the black swan Cygnus atratus, as well as 23
other waterbird species (Cowan 2001).
The marsh sandpiper Tringa stagnatilis was recorded by Harewood (2017) at a large freshwater lake near
the northwest boundary of the Project area in April 2017. This species is not threatened, but as a
migratory shorebird, is listed under the WC Act (Schedule 5) and international agreements. It probably
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
15
only occurs in wetland areas of the Project after significant rainfall events. It has also been noted
(Harewood 2017) that several other migratory waders, all of which breed in the northern hemisphere,
have the potential to occur at Lake Wells but that the presence of suitable habitat relies on unpredictable,
episodic rainfall.
Overall, a moderate number of waterbird and shorebird species have been recorded at Lake Wells, with
observations coming predominantly from fresher claypans surrounding the main saline playa system.
Water levels in the main saline playa system were low during all survey events, so that the significance
of the main playa for waterbirds and shorebirds remains uncertain. Significant use of the playa system
by waterbirds and/or shorebirds would certainly be limited to periods after heavy rainfall and
subsequent flooding (e.g. Lane and Chapman 2001).
5. CONCLUSIONS This study aimed to determine the ecological values of Lake Wells including the compositions of aquatic
invertebrate, diatom, macrophyte and waterbird communities. Given that the ecologies of episodic
inland lakes vary greatly according to the stage of the hydrocycle when the system is sampled,
assessments of the values of lake systems often contain a considerable element of uncertainty and this
is the case with Lake Wells.
The nine sites sampled in the Lake Wells system included very shallow hypersaline pools in saline playas,
freshwater pools in claypans and dry playas. Salinity ranged from fresh (external claypan pools) to
hypersaline (main saline playas). pH values ranged from mildly acidic to circumneutral.
The March 2017 survey took place relatively soon after significant rainfall in January and February and
the aquatic invertebrate, diatom and macrophyte results are considered likely to provide a reasonable
snapshot of the value of the lake for these components of its ecology. By the time survey occurred, the
value of the main saline playa system for waterbirds and shorebirds was low. However, combining results
of this and other surveys showed that a moderate number of waterbird and shorebird species use the
fresher surrounding claypans after rainfall.
At least 64 invertebrate species of aquatic invertebrates were collected. The higher-level groups
recorded were flatworms, rotifers, roundworms, crustaceans and insects. Crustaceans were the most
diverse of these groups, with 21 species collected that encompassed seven orders recorded (brine
shrimps, clam shrimps, water fleas, shield shrimps, calanoid copepods, cyclopoid copepods and seed
shrimps). Insects were the most speciose group, however, with 24 species from four orders (beetles, flies,
true bugs, and dragon- and damselflies). Lake Wells appears to have a rich invertebrate fauna compared
with most other inland saline playa systems, although comparisons between studies need to take
account of differences in conditions at the time of sampling, scope and sampling methods.
Most of the invertebrates collected belong to widespread species. Collection of three species at Lake
Wells may possibly represent the first time these species have been recorded. They are the clam shrimp
Eocyzicus sp. B01 and ostracods Bennelongia nr koendersae and Bennelongia sp. BOS833 (nimala
lineage). It is considered likely that the ranges of all three species extend beyond the Lake Wells system.
The 55 diatom species collected in the Lake Wells system also appear to represent a relatively rich
assemblage for an inland saline playa system. There was not a clear inverse relationship between richness
and salinity, as is commonly observed for diatom assemblages, with 37 species recorded from sites in
the main saline playa. All species are likely to be widespread.
Two species of aquatic macrophyte, Ruppia sp. and Marsilea sp., were collected. It was not possible to
identify either taxa to species-level due to the absence of fruiting bodies that are required for further
identification.
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
16
Only three species of waterbird (grey teal, red-capped plover and Australian shelduck) were seen in
March 2017 but white-necked heron and black-tailed native-hen were recorded in October 2017 during
a stygofauna survey by Bennelongia. A two-phase vertebrate survey recorded an additional 11 species.
All the waterbird and shorebird species recorded at Lake Wells are widespread and are frequently
recorded at inland saline lakes. Indications were that the period of significant inundation was too short
to support much, if any, waterbird breeding in early 2017 and whether the system occasionally has high
waterbird values after flooding is unknown. All recorded species are widespread.
Overall, the wetland conservation values of Lake Wells appear to be relatively high but all (or nearly all)
recorded species are widespread and have ranges extending well beyond the Lake Wells system. Rather
than hosting rare or endemic species, the principal ecological value of Lake Wells is the episodic
occurrence of an abundant and speciose biota.
6. REFERENCES
Beadle, L.C. (1943) An ecological survey of some inland saline waters of Algeria. Journal of the
Limnological Society, Zoology 43, 218-242.
Bennelongia (2012) Lake Raeside dewatering discharge compliance monitoring report 2012. Report
2012/176. Bennelongia Pty Ltd, Jolimont, 40 pp.
Bennelongia (2016a) Matilda Gold Project: aquatic invertebrate, diatom and sediment monitoring at
Lake Way. Bennelongia Pty Ltd, Jolimont, 22 pp.
Bennelongia (2016b) S2 Recources Ltd: Baloo Project salt lake ecological survey. Report 267/2016.
Bennelongia Pty Ltd, Jolimont, 16 pp.
Bennelongia (2017) Aquatic ecology and waterbirds at Lake Disappointment: additional studies. Report
301. Bennelongia Pty Ltd, Jolimont, 36 pp.
Blinn, D.W. (1991) The diatom flora of Lake Eyre South: a large episodically filled salt lake in South
Australia. Hydrobiologia 210, 101-104.
Cáceres, E.C. and Schwalbach, M.S. (2001) How well do laboratory experiments explain field patterns of
zooplankton emergence? Freshwater Biology 46, 1179-1189.
Harewood, G. (2017) Fauna Survey (Level 2). Phase 1 (September 2016) and Phase 2 (April 2017). Lake
Wells Potash Project. Report 01-000017-1/2. Greg Harewood, Bunbury, 122 pp.
Jacobs, S.W.L. and Brock, M.A (1982) A revision of the genus Ruppia (Potamogetonaceae) in Australia.
Aquatic Botany 14, 325-337.
Lane, J.A.K., and Chapman, A. (2001) Waterfowl usage of wetlands in the south-east arid interior of
Western Australia 1992-93. Emu 97, 51-59.
López-López, A., Hudson, P. and Galián, J. (2016) Islands in the desert: species delimitation and
evolutionary history of Pseudotetracha tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae: Megacephalini)
from Australian salt lakes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 101, 279-285.
Martens, K., Halse, S., and Schon, I. (2015) On the Bennelongia nimala and B. triangulata lineages
(Crustacea, Ostracoda) in Western Australia, with the description of six new species. European
Journal of Taxonomy 111, 1-36.
McCairns, R.F., Freitag, R., Rose, H.A. and McDonald, F.J.D. (1997) Taxonomic revision of the Australian
Cicindelidae (Coleoptera), excluding species of Cicindela. Invertebrate Systematics 11, 599-688.
Pinder, A.M., Halse, S.A., McRae, J.M., and Shiel, R.J. (2004) Aquatic invertebrate assemblages of wetlands
and rivers in the wheatbelt region of Western Australia. Records of the Western Australian
Museum Supplement 67, 7-37.
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
17
Pinder, A.M., Halse, S.A., Shiel, R.J., and McRae, J.M. (2010) An arid zone awash with diversity: patterns in the
distribution of aquatic invertebrates in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Records of the Western
Australian Museum Supplement 78, 205-246.
Radzikowski, J. (2013) Resistance of dormant stages of planktonic invertebrates to adverse
environmental conditions. Journal of Plankton Research 0, 1-17.
Rodman, S., Puglisi, J. and Taukulis, F. (2016) Using hatching trials to assess the aquatic biota in dry salt
lakes and wetlands. MWH Global, Jolimont, Western Australia.
Sainty, G.R. and Jacobs, S.W.L. (1994) Waterplants in Australia. A field guide. Third edition. Sainty and
Associates, Darlinghurst, Australia.
Schwentner, M., Timms, B.V. and Richter, S. (2013) Evolutionary systemtics of the Australian Eocyzicus
fauna (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Spinicaudata) reveals hidden diversity and phylogeographic
structure. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 52, 15-31.
Taukulis, F.E. and John, J. (2006) Diatoms as ecological indicators in lakes and streams of varying salinity
from the wheatbelt region of Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia
89, 17-25.
Timms, B.V., Datson, B., and Coleman, M. (2006) The wetlands of the Lake Carey catchment, northeast
Goldfields of Western Australia, with special reference to large branchiopods. Journal of the Royal
Society of Western Australia 89, 175-183.
Williams, W.D. and Kokkinn, M.J. (1988) The biogeographical affinities of the fauna in episodically filled salt
lakes: A study of Lake Eyre, South Australia. Hydrobiologia 158, 227-236.
Williams, W.D., De Deckker, P., and Shiel, R.J. (1998) The limnology of Lake Torrens, an episodic salt lake of
central Australia, with particular reference to unique events in 1989. Hydrobiologia 384, 101-110.
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
18
7. APPENDICES
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
19
Appendix 1. Photographs and descriptions of sampling sites at Lake Wells in March 2017.
LW1 LW2 LW3
Location: -27.2678, 123.0300
Water depth: 5 mm
Invertebrate sample: in situ
Temperature: 26.6
EC: 195,200 µS cm-1
pH: 6.49
Position: Internal
Description: Transient hypersaline film
on salt lake playa
Location: -27.2733, 123.0154
Water depth: 30 mm
Invertebrate sample: in situ
Temperature: 30.2
EC: 176,000 µS cm-1
pH: 6.89
Position: Internal
Comments: Transient hypersaline film on
salt lake playa
Location: -27.2375, 123.2444
Water depth: 150 mm
Invertebrate sample: in situ
Temperature: 27.7
EC: 390 µS cm-1
pH: 6.78
Position: External
Comments: Freshwater claypan pool
LW4 LW5 LW6
Location: -27.2477, 123.2102
Water depth: 100 mm
Invertebrate sample: in situ
Temperature: 28.0
EC: 2,990 µS cm-1
pH: 7.44
Position: External
Comments: Brackish claypan pool
Location: -27.2653, 122.9499
Water depth: 300 mm
Invertebrate sample: in situ
Temperature: 20.3
EC: 5,820 µS cm-1
pH: 7.35
Position: Intermediate
Comments: Saline claypan pool
Location: -27.2443, 122.9836
Water depth: dry
Invertebrate sample: in situ
Temperature: -
EC: -
pH: -
Position: Internal
Comments: Dry salt lake playa
LW7 LW8 LW9
Location: -27.2056, 123.0381
Water depth: dry
Invertebrate sample: in situ
Temperature: -
EC: -
pH: -
Position: Intermediate
Comments: Dry claypan playa
Location: -27.3282, 122.9251
Water depth: 100 mm
Invertebrate sample: in situ
Temperature: 20.3
EC: 48 µS cm-1
pH: 6.27
Position: External
Comments: Freshwater claypan pool
Location: -27.2538, 123.0103
Water depth: dry
Invertebrate sample: in situ
Temperature: -
EC: -
pH: -
Position: External
Comments: Dry salt lake playa
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
20
Appendix 2. Distribution of diatom species at Lake Wells. Ecological classifications: Ac= acid indicator; Ae= aerophilous (frequent wet sediment); N= nutrients; S = high salinity (P. Gell, pers. comm., June 2017).
Species Ecology LW1 LW2 LW3 LW4 LW5 LW6 LW7 LW8 LW9 Abundanc
e
No. of sites
present
Actinocyclus sp. 3 3 1
Amphora borealis S 10 2 1 1 14 4
Amphora coffeaeformis S 1 1 1
Amphora subcapitata 1 1 1
Aulacoseira alpigena 1 5 4 1 2 13 5
Brachysira styriaca Ac 1 5 4 2 12 4
Chaetoceros sp. S 2 1 3 2
Craticula cuspidata 2 2 1
Craticula halophila 1 6 7 2
Encyonema silesiaca 1 1 1
Eolimna minima N 2 2 1
Eunotia bilunaris Ac 1 1 1
Eunotia exigua Ac 1 1 1
Eunotia minor Ac 2 1 3 2
Fragilaria tenera 1 1 1
Frustulia rhomboides Ac 1 3 2 6 2 4 3 21 7
Gomphonema gracile 3 3 1
Hantzschia amphioxys Ae 1 6 9 16 3
Hantzschia petitiana S 47 47 1
Hantzschia virgata Ae 2 2 1
Luticola mutica Ae, N 6 7 1 2 16 4
Luticola muticopsis Ae, N 1 1 1
Mayamaea atomus N 1 1 1
Navicula incertata S 43 1 8 52 3
Navicula leptostriata 7 1 12 13 6 13 23 20 20 115 9
Navicula krasskei 2 2 4 2
Navicula cf molestiformis 14 8 1 23 3
Navicula perminuta S 11 7 4 22 3
Navicula cf pseudobryophila 3 1 4 2
Navicula recens 1 1 1
Navicula salinicola S 77 1 1 1 80 4
Navicula subtillissima 1 1 1
Navicula tenelloides S 9 9 1
Nitzschia commutata 1 5 1 7 3
Lake Wells Wetland Ecology
Australian Potash Ltd
21
Species Ecology LW1 LW2 LW3 LW4 LW5 LW6 LW7 LW8 LW9 Abundanc
e
No. of sites
present
Nitzscchia graciliformis 1 1 1
Nitzschia cf hantzschiana 1 1 1
Nitzschia palea N 6 3 9 2
Nitzschia paleaceae 8 8 1
Nitzschia sociabilis 7 7 1
Nitzschia tubicola N 1 4 5 2
Nitzschia cf vasta 8 8 1
Pinnularia appendiculata Ac 3 3 1
Pinnularia borealis Ae 1 5 1 7 3
Pinnularia divergentissima Ac 2 2 1
Pinnularia microstauron 11 2 13 2
Pinnularia subcapitata Ac 3 5 39 1 1 49 5
Sellaphora laevissima 5 5 1
Sellaphora seminulum N 6 3 9 2
Seminavis sp. 21 21 1
Stauroneis anceps comb. 18 18 1
Stauroneis obtusa 21 1 22 2
Staurosira subsalina 1 3 4 2 5 6 21 6
Staurosira venter 2 1 3 2
Stenopterobia delicatissima 1 1 1
Tabellaria flocculosa Ac 1 2 1 4 3
Total Abundance 203 11 72 145 65 103 29 41 38 707
Total No. of Species 17 8 13 21 17 17 3 11 12 55