Symbolic interactionism

Our self-image – how we think of ourselves – is shaped by interacting socially, with others

Labeling theory

We think of ourselves as others define us

As children age and becoming increasingly adventurous, their labels may go from “just being a kid,” to “a good kid acting badly”, to, perhaps, “a bad kid”

Lemert- general theory of deviance

Criminal behavior starts due to other factors (biological, sociological, social learning, etc.)

If bad behavior persists outsiders may label someone as “delinquent” and attach the social meanings of the label

Those who continue behaving poorly adopt the self-image of a delinquent

This “redefinition of self” persists independently of the original causes of the behavior

Many who commit crime don’t considerthemselves “criminals” Maintaining a non-criminal self-image is

important Justifications and neutralizers used to excuse conduct

▪ “Just borrowing the money” “They can afford it” “They had it coming”

To make labels stick society applies threats and sanctions Criminal law is the ultimate threat to one’s identity Criminal processing is a “degradation ceremony” Sticky labels – such as convictions and imprisonment – can make it

difficult for those so labeled to reform

▪ Justifications no longer work, so persons may redefine themselves as being criminals

▪ Violators may be ostracized from conventional society

▪ Cannot obtain legitimate employment

▪ Turn to deviance to satisfy social and material needs

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7356334n&tag=mncol;lst;7

Labeling theorists overemphasize its explanatory power

Labeling does not automatically lead to deviancy

Some deviants may actually seek out the label

If law-abiding persons are law-abiding because they want to avoid being labeled, reducing the stigma of a label may INCREASE criminal behavior

Juveniles may be more affected by what others think of them, especially their parents, than what society or the authorities think

If labeled as “rule violators” they may choose to live up to these expectations

Katz – “Seductions of Crime” Crime can’t be explained by “background”

variables (race, class, etc.) Crime best explained by examining “foreground”

variables:

▪ What does it feel like to commit a crime?

▪ What are criminals trying to accomplish? Crime motivated by the need to transcend “moral challenges”

▪ Passion killers: escape humiliating situation

▪ Delinquents: demonstrate personal competence

▪ Gang members: response to “humbling” by conventional society Crime reinforced by the “thrill” of its commission

“Lived meanings” of organized and white collar crime Satisfaction of “getting it over” on “marks” Joys of thumbing one’s nose at conventional society

http://youtu.be/Ur3nMiP-XV0

8 mis.

Evil means to intentionally harm or degrade others

“Following orders” not an excuse

Moral imperatives to “defend the homeland” giveacts legitimacy

Stereotyping and dehumanizing others removes themfrom actor’s “moral sphere”

Heavy situational pressures on people’s behavior blurs line between criminals and non-criminals

In 2010 the Feds convicted former Chicago police commander Jon Burge, 62, of perjury for falsely denying in an earlier civil suit that in the 1980s he and his officers extracted confessions through beatings, electric shocks and suffocation. One, Michael Tillman, was freed in January 2010 after spending 23 years in prison for a murder he didn’t commit. Police Issues

Individual traits (differences between people) might make little difference

Still, some persons, even if pressured to act badly, do resist

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/video?id=7912375

2.5 mis.

Societies “create” crime by passing laws Campaigns against crime are in everyone’s name, but can

benefit only select groups Economically

▪ Law against vagrancy used to create pool of cheap labor▪ Defining drug users as criminals creates a demand for police,

prosecutors, etc. Symbolically

▪ Temperance movement reasserted Protestant values Groups must gain power to define who’s deviant Controlology

Criminal justice a mechanism used by State to control “problem” populations▪ Others include education, mental health, mass media

Purpose is more than just control -- it’s “to manifest state power” Over time rationale has shifted from crude to sophisticated

▪ Public executions rehabilitation Iron fist remains hidden in the “velvet glove” Much in common with Marxist and critical criminology