L.A. Hamel 1 , M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 , J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

18
L.A. Hamel 1 , M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 , J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 , T. Narita 3 , J.M. Ryan 2 , M. Whidholm 2 1 Département de Physique, Université de Montréal 2 Space Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham 3 Departement of Physics, College of the Holy Cross

description

L.A. Hamel 1 , M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 , J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 , T. Narita 3 , J.M. Ryan 2 , M. Whidholm 2. 1 Département de Physique, Université de Montréal 2 Space Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham 3 Departement of Physics, College of the Holy Cross. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of L.A. Hamel 1 , M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 , J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

Page 1: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

L.A. Hamel1, M. Benoit1, B. Dönmez2, J.R. Macri2, M.L. McConnell2,

T. Narita3, J.M. Ryan2, M. Whidholm2

1 Département de Physique, Université de Montréal2 Space Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham 3 Departement of Physics, College of the Holy Cross

Page 2: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

• 2N instead of N2 channels

• Rely on good charge sharing between X and Y

• Previous model (225 m pitch) has shown poor sharing

• Improved simulation for device optimization

Page 3: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,
Page 4: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,
Page 5: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

interaction sites from GEANT4

Energy deposited at each site is supposed a small 3-D Gaussian e-h distribution

Page 6: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,
Page 7: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

tNe

DzyxR

zyx )5

1)

4

3(

15

1(2

,,0

.,2

Page 8: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,
Page 9: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

• Field maps from Comsol multiphysics.

• Results shown for the 225 µm model, with a grid.

Page 10: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

Weighting potentials

Page 12: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

• 225µm model

Page 13: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

• 225µm model

Page 14: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

• 225µm model

ExperimentalResult (Co 57)

Simulated result122 keV, Co57

Page 15: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

• 225µm model

Cs-137

Ba-133

Page 16: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

150 microns pitch

Page 17: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

• 150µm model

Co-57

Page 18: L.A. Hamel 1 ,  M. Benoit 1 , B. Dönmez 2 ,      J.R. Macri 2 , M.L. McConnell 2 ,

• Combination of repulsion, diffusion, trapping, and accurate field and weighting potentials yields to better predictions

• Reproduces results for 225 µm pitch

• Predicts good sharing for 150 µm pitch