L1.2 International Economic Institutions

36
Chapter 2 International Economic Institutions Since World War II

description

International Economics

Transcript of L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Page 1: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Chapter 2

International Economic

Institutions Since World

War II

Page 2: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-2

Learning Objectives

• Classify and give examples of the main types of international economic organizations.

• Compare and give examples of the different levels of integration found in regional trade agreements.

• Analyze the roles of international economic organizations.

• Discuss common criticisms of international economic organizations

Page 3: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-3

Introduction: International Institutions and Issues since World War II

• International institutions: Rules and organizations that govern and constrain behavior – Formal institutions: Written sets of rules that

explicitly state what is and is not allowed

– Informal institutions: Customs or traditions that define appropriate behavior, but without legal enforcement

Page 4: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-4

TABLE 2.1 A Taxonomy of International Economic Institutions, with Examples

Page 5: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-5

The IMF, the World Bank, and the WTO

The three global organizations that play a major role in international economic relations are:

– The International Monetary Fund (IMF)– The World Bank– The World Trade Organization (WTO)

Page 6: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-6

The IMF and World Bank

International Monetary Fund (IMF)•Founded by 29 countries (1945) at the Bretton Woods conference in July 1944

•The 188 member (2012) IMF is the central monetary institution in today’s international economy

Page 7: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-7

The IMF and World Bank (cont.)

• Funding for the IMF comes from its membership fee, or quota (the price of membership)

• depends on size of the economy• Importance of its currency in world trade

Page 8: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-8

The IMF and World Bank (cont.)

The most visible role for the IMF is to intercede, by invitation, whenever a nation experiences a crisis in its international payments.

For example, if a country imports more than it exports, then it may run out of foreign exchange reserves.

Page 9: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-9

The IMF and World Bank (cont.)

• Foreign exchange reserves are dollars, yen, pounds, euros, or another currency (or gold) that is accepted internationally.

• In the event of a financial crisis, – Members borrow against IMF quotas– IMF conditionality: Requirement for the

borrowing member to carry out economic reforms in exchange for a loan

Page 10: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-10

The IMF and World Bank (cont.)

• IMF has its own currency, called an SDR, or special drawing right

• SDRs are based on a country’s quota and are a part of its international reserves.

Page 11: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-11

The IMF and World Bank (cont.)

World Bank

•Has same membership and similar structure to IMF

•Member’s voting rights are proportional to number of shares owned

Page 12: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-12

The IMF and World Bank (cont.)

• Original purpose- To provide financing mechanisms to rebuild

Europe after World War II

• Main function today- Assisting development in non-industrial

economies

Page 13: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-13

• Began with 23 nations in 1946 when the International Trade Organization (ITO) was established

• The General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) followed in 1950

The GATT, the Uruguay Round, and the WTO

Page 14: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-14

• The GATT functioned through trade rounds: Times when countries periodically negotiate a set of incremental tariff reductions

• During the Kennedy Round in the mid-1960’s, and the Tokyo Round in the 1970’s, other issues included:- Problems with dumping- Subsidies to industry- Nontariff barriers to trade

The GATT, the Uruguay Round, and the WTO (cont.)

Page 15: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-15

• The Uruguay Round established the WTO (1995)

• The Doha Round/Doha Development Agenda (2001-2006)– Focused on trade issues of

importance to developing countries

The GATT, the Uruguay Round, and the WTO (cont.)

Page 16: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-16

The General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) followed the following principles:

– National treatment: Imports must be given similar treatment on the domestic market as domestically produced goods

– Nondiscrimination: Enshrined in the concept of most favored nation (MFN); a prohibition against discrimination

The GATT, the Uruguay Round, and the WTO (cont.)

Page 17: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-17

TABLE 2.2 The GATT Rounds

Page 18: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-18

Regional Trade Agreements

• Regional trade agreements (RTAs) between two (bilateral) or

• Several countries (plurilateral) are another important institution in the world economy,

• Called multilateral agreement because it includes, potentially, all the countries of the world.

Page 19: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-19

TABLE 2.3 Five Types of Regional Trade Agreements

Page 20: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-20

TABLE 2.4 Prominent Regional Trade Blocs

Page 21: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-21

TABLE 2.4 (continued) Prominent Regional Trade Blocs

Page 22: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-22

Five Types of Regional Trade Agreements

1. Partial trade agreement: Two or more countries agree to drop trade barriers in a selected group of product categories such as steel or autos

2. Free-trade area: Nations trade goods and services across international boundaries without paying a tariff and without the limitations imposed by quotas

Page 23: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-23

Five Types of Regional Trade Agreements (cont.)

3. Customs union (CU): An FTA plus a common external tariff (CET)

– European Union in the 1970s and 1980s– MERCOSUR in South America

4. Common market: A CU plus an agreement to allow the free mobility of inputs, such as labor and capital. - The European Union in the 1990s

Page 24: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-24

Five Types of Regional Trade Agreements (cont.)

5. Economic Union: A common market with coordination of macroeconomic policies (including common currency, harmonization of standards and regulations)– United States– Canada– European Union members participating in the

Euro currency zone

Page 25: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-25

Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO

• Since 1948, over 500 agreements have been listed with the WTO; with majority of the notifications since 1990

• 338 of these agreements are still active (2012)

• The WTO and GATT allow RTAs, assuming they create more new trade than they destroy

- trade creation > trade diversion

Page 26: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-26

For and Against RTAs

• The central economic question:• Are RTAs supportive of gradual, long run

increases in world trade (building blocks),or

• Do they tend to become obstacles to further relaxation of trade barriers (stumbling blocks)?

Page 27: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-27

For and Against RTAs (cont.)

• Proponents of RTAs view them as building blocks toward freer, more open, world trade

• Opponents view RTAs as undermining progress toward multilateral (worldwide) agreements

Page 28: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-28

For and Against RTAs (cont.)

Opponents question many of these assumptions:1.Their greatest criticism is that RTAs undermine progress toward multilateral (worldwide) agreements.2.Pro-trade opponents of RTAs do not believe that they encourage agreements through the WTO3.Opponents point out that RTAs are often discriminatory against poor and less-developed countries

Page 29: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-29

For and Against RTAs (cont.)

Proponents have several arguments on their side. 1.Easier for a few countries to reach agreement than it is for all the countries in the WTO.2.The domestic effects of a reduction of trade barriers are less dramatic. 3.RTA member countries can experiment with new agreements.4.RTAs can be used as a political and economic threat to encourage agreements in the WTO.

Page 30: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-30

The Role of International Economic Institutions

• The primary difference between international institutions and national governments is that the former have limited enforcement power

• However, international institutions help provide order and reduce uncertainty• Order and certainty are public goods—

intangibles that are different from most goods and services

Page 31: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-31

Definition of Public Goods

• Public goods are:

– Nonexcludable: The normal price mechanism does not work as a way of regulating access to them

– Nonrival (or nondiminishable): They are not diminished or reduced by consumption

Page 32: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-32

Definition of Public Goods (cont.)

• Private markets fail to supply public goods because of free riding: People have no incentive to pay for a public good because they cannot be excluded from its consumption even if they don’t pay

Page 33: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-33

Maintaining Order and Reducing Uncertainty

• Two important functions of international economic institutions to reduce free riding are:• Maintaining order in international economic

relations• Reducing uncertainty

Page 34: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-34

TABLE 2.5 Four Examples of International Public Goods

Page 35: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-35

Criticism of International Institutions

International institutions receive three types of criticism

1. Sovereignty and Transparency- International institutions can violate national

sovereignty by imposing unwanted domestic economic policies

- Transparency concerns are based on questions about the mechanism with which decisions are made within an international institution

Page 36: L1.2 International Economic Institutions

Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-36

Criticism of International Institutions (cont.)

2. Ideology- Critics argue that the advise and technical assistance

provided to developing countries are often a reflection of the biases and wishes of developed country wishes.

3. Implementation and adjustment costs- When agreements are reached that combine

developed and developing countries, there are often asymmetries in the ability to absorb the costs associated with them that favor developed nations.