L07_Gp5.pptx
Transcript of L07_Gp5.pptx
DEFAMATION INCIDENT IMPACTS
LIVES OF ALL INVOLVED
DCO 20119 Case Study No.5
Chan Chi Hang (52641937)
Lung Kwok Fai Gary (52609740)
Chan Pui Ching Derek (52596741)
Li Wai Kei Ricky (52642018)
Case Someone posted defamation threads in
AutoAdmit – an online forum for law student Victim setup a lawsuit One of the defendant is Anthony Ciolli –
admin of AutoAdmit but he was dropped later
Anthony loss an offer from a law firm Anthony setup a lawsuit against the
defamation victim
Did the two law school students overreact in filing a lawsuit over these postings? Admin was urged to delete the harassment post but
nothing was done. Author of the post violate First Amendment of Right Posts do corrupt their reputation. There is need to take action
What sort of penalties should be levied against the anonymous posters? Defamation is a Civil procedure Public apologies compensation
Did Anthony Ciolli act ethically ? His response to the postings on AutoAdmit Apparent “damage control” actions with the
Boston law firm Filing a lawsuit against the two Yale Law
School students
His response to the postings on AutoAdmit
Anthony do not have permission to delete offensive content
He had complied with the Plaintiffs request but failed.
Ethical
Did Anthony Ciolli act ethically ? His response to the postings on AutoAdmit Apparent “damage control” actions with the
Boston law firm Filing a lawsuit against the two Yale Law
School students
Apparent “damage control” actions with the Boston law firm Anthony claim himself as Administrator But claim himself as Education Director to
the law firm (Without Permission to delete) Done nothing but resign Did not take any Responsibility Unethical
Did Anthony Ciolli act ethically ? His response to the postings on AutoAdmit Apparent “damage control” actions with the
Boston law firm Filing a lawsuit against the two Yale Law
School students
Filing a lawsuit against the two Yale Law School students Web Administrator is protected by law
(Communications Decency Act of 1996) Plaintiffs are studying in law school should
understand Anthony do get loss after the avoidable
lawsuit (i.e. the offer from the law firm)
Ethical
Do Boston law firm was right in revoking its job offer to Ciolli? After Boston law firm had learnt about the
AutoAdmit controversy, they immediately revoke its job offer to Ciolli on 11 April 2007.
Right or Wrong?
Right
From law firm point of view Ciolli act unethically as an administrator AutoAdmit that he didn’t react with the
harassment content correctly This is not the first time AutoAdmit was
found harassment posting Ensure all employee would be obey the
company policy as well as Code of Ethics
Wrong
There is a law that protects the administrator from the defamation content on the forum.
The lawsuit was not judged, Ciolli had no liability at that time.
“Freedom of Expression” in Hong Kong and Mainland China Lawsuit between HKGOLDEN and
Oriental Daily, Hong Kong (HCA2140/08) A defamation post was posted into the
Forum. Admin of HKGOLDEN was charged by
Oriental Daily. Finally, HKGOLDEN only need to response
for post that they didn’t deleted. Unethical?
Chinese Nobel prizewinner Liu Xiaobo Charter 08 is written by him Including different demands
Freedom of speechFreedom of religion
Talked about the freedom, universal value and equality.
Cyber bulling in HK
Human flesh search engine People who don’t like the target – expose
his / her personal information (e.g. Address, phone, education profile)
Internet User become a judge E.g. “Konggal wedding 500”
Conclusion
Web Administrator cannot control the content of its site
They do not have liability if they remove it efficiently.
Defamation include cyber bullying can cause huge damage to the victim.
We have Freedom of Speech but should obey First Amendment of Speech