l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

CEDSERRCH CDRSULTHRrS LI HI IT E D

52N82NW8042 2 .6559 CORLESS

Electromagnetic and Magnetic Surveyfor

DOME EXPLORATION (CANADA) LIMITED

on

Project 231 Corless Lake Area, Ontario

(To Accompany Maps 83-235, 236-north & south)

November 4, 1983A'ilM',\r ,'v f ,f ;.

010

l

INTRODUCTION

l

l

l

l

lAn electromagnetic and magnetic survey was carried

l out on behalf of Dome Exploration (Canada) Limited on Project 231*

Corless Lake, Ontario in September, 1983*

The claims are located in the eastern part of Corless

l Township and the western part of Dent Twonship immediately north

east of Corless Lake, Ontario. The centre of the claim group is

l approximately 70 Km East-north-east of Red Lake, Ontario. The

m approximate latitude is 51*12' North and the approximate longitude

is 92*50' West.

l Access to the grid was by fixed wing aircraft from the

town of Red Lake, Ontario.

The purpose of the survey was to locate sub-surface

l gco-electrical conductors which might represent economic minerali

zation. The accompanying maps show the area surveyed and the

l results obtained.

l A technical data sheet is appended to this report.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

~ 2

METHOD AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS - ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY

Principle; When an electrical conductor is subjected to a

primary alternating field, a secondary current is induced in the

conductor. This current produces a secondary alternating field

which together with the primary field produces a resultant field of

different amplitude and phase from the applied primary field. These

differences may indicate the presence of a conductor.

Opera t ion ; The battery-powered transmitter sets up a primary field

while the in-phase and out-of-phase (quadrature) components of the

complex secondary vertical field are detected by a receiving coil

and measured by means of a compensator-amplifier unit located a fixed

distance from the transmitter unit. These parameters are expressed

in percentage of the primary field*

Conduc tor Recognition ; The typical curve over a steeply-dipping conductor

shows a low (negative - greater than y/o} over the centre of the

conductor, flanked by positive readings on both sides of the conductor.

Both the in-phase and the out-of-phase components usually produce

the same general shape of curve. An asymmetrical curve may indicate

one or more of the following conditions! (l) more than one conductor

(2) variable conductive overburden (3) a shallow dipping conductor.

C pnduc.t iy i t y Do t e rmina t ion ; The ratio of the amplitudes of the two

measured components, in-phase to out-of-phase, is directly proportional

to the conductivity of the conductor, in areas of non-conductive

overburden.

Conductor Location: For a single conductor, both component readings are

normally Hero when either the transmitting or receiving coil is

directly above the conductor. The location of the conductor is cal

culated by adding one-half the distance between the transmitting coil

and the receiving coil (coil interval) to the co-ordinate at which

the readings are zero. A unique solution is generally not possible

in the case of multiple conductors spaced less than one coil interval

apart. This results in the possibility that an apparently wide

conductor may actually consist of two or more narrow conductors o

Depth of Penetration! The maximum deptli of penetration for detection of

a steeply-clipping conductor in a geo-electrically neutral background

is about 0.7 times the coil interval. Over horizontal or flatly-

dipping conductors, penetration of up to 1.5 times Hie coil interval

is possible.

- 3 -

ll *

l

RESULTS

l No significant conductive zones were located by this

survey. The abundant outcrop in the area indicates that the

l depth to bed rock is not great over any significant part of the

g grid. Lack of response is therefore not due to depth of burial

but more likely due to lack of conductive rock zones.

l The magnetic survey also failed to locate any signi-

ficant anomalies.

M J RECOMMENDATIONS

Careful examination of the distribution of rock types

l and the subtle variations in both magnetics and electromagnetics

m may allow extrapolation of some geologic contacts* Further

follow-up will depend on a combination of geological interest

l

VlIT/mm W. li. Thompson P. Eng.

l

l

l

and the subtle anomalies indicated.

Geosearch Consultants Limited

l l l l l l

Parameters measured! The vertical in-phase and out-of-phase

l (quadrature) components of the secondary field.

Frequencies: 3555 Hz and 888 Hz

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

Project 231

ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY

Instrument: Max Min II

Accuracy: l/o per scale division

Method: In line

Coil configuration: Co-planar

Coil separation: 100m

Number of readings at 25m stations: 1380

Total number of readings: 1380 Line spacing: 100m

Profile scale: lcm to

MAGNETIC SURVEY

Instrument: Scintrex Model MP2 Total Field Proton Magnetometer

Magnetic field measured: Total field

Accuracy - scale constant: l gamma

Diurnal correction method: Proton magnetometer recorder at

.60 second intervals

Base station locations: Line IN at 3+75

Number of readings at 25m stations: 1380

Total number of readings: 1380 Line spacing: 100m

Contour interval: 1 00 gamma

* y c:

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological,Gtocriemic.aJ and Expenditures

?S2N02NWeei42 2,6559 CORLESS 900

T G'v\ nstiip o r

Electromagnetic and lla/rneticHO'CIC' lil

Dome Exploration (Canada) Limited

i Corless b Pent Twps.Prospector s Dct'Mce No -

l A 21304

Box 270, l First Canadian Place, Toronto, Ont. M5X 1H1'Tota' Miles o f line Cu!

37.4 kmSurvey Company Dale o* Survey (from 6 K))

Geosearch Consultants Ltd.Name ana Address o* Aulfior iof Geo "I echrnca! report)

v'. H t Thompson, Suite 700 - 88 University Ave., Toronto, Ont. M5J 1T6Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSnecia' Provisions

For first s urvey:

Enter 40 d ays. ( This includes, line cutting)

For each additional survey: usmp t he s ame and:

Enter 2 0 d ays ifor each)

Days perClaim

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic h Q

- Mapnetomete' P O

- Radiomeirtc

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Man Days

Complete reverse s ide

and enter total(s) here

Geophysical

- E lectromagnetic

Mapnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

G e o c h t* m i c a l

! Days PC?l Claim

Airhorne C redits

Note: S peciai provisions E lectr o magnet i c

credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys, i Magnetometer

l1 Radiomen ic

! Days per Claiml Clai

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work P erformed

Performed on Oaim(s)

Calculation of E xpenditure Days Credits

"Total E xpenditures

M i n i n q Claim Prefix [' Numher

KRL 621801

621802

62180362180462180562180662180762180S

. ..621802 —.

.621810 ^u . 6.21811; .6 2.1 8 12.. ^

^ 6.21.813,....: 621814

L 621813 __i. 621816 . 621817 .621818 .621819 . 621820 621821

. 621822

Expend. Days O.

-—— -——

- -- ---

i::k -./"

/

Mi

n

K9.1

Mining Cla?m Prefix Numhe-

KRL 621824

621825

^

•i T C; ja E U S- L*

7" 1 4 1^^

^s;-t,i

f D LAKE'/AIMING DIV.

C E IV E DAR 2 9 1984

P.M.

; ^ --

C

^

,;i.

E xpend Days C '.

— --

- -- -

Total number of m ining claims covered b y this report of work.Snstr a ctions

Total Days Cfedits may he apportioned a i t he c laim holder's choice. E.nter number of days credits per claim selectedin columns at n o h t.

Holder ot*Agent ( Signature

Certification VerijTymc] Report of Work

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the iacls set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is Uue.

rne ana Postal A ddress of Person Certifying

V. II. Thompson, Suite 700 - 88 University Ave., Toronto, Ont 0 M5J 1T6s r\

Dale Certified

Nov. k , 1 983

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No

TYPE OF SURVEY

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

l J

GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

Signature of Assessor

r^

1984 08 08 Your File: 84-18 Our File: 2.6559

Albert Scott RivettMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesOntario Government BuildingBox 5003Red Lake, OntarioPOV 2MO

Dear Sir:

RE: Notice of Intent dated July 11, 1984.Geophysical (Electromagnetic i Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims KRL 621801 et al In the Townships of Corless A Dent.

The assessment work credits as listed with the above mentioned Notice of Intent* have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: (416) 965-6918

S. Hurst:se

cc: Dome Exploration (Gtruada) Ltd Box 270, l First Canadian Place Toronto, Ontario M5X 1H1

cc: Mr. 6.H. FergusonMining tt Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

cc: Resident Geologist REd Lake, Ontario

/^J~v Ministry 01 Technical Assessi

\VJ Resources Work CreditsOntario fk

Tient File2.6559

Date Mining Recorders. Report of

1984 07 11 Work^ "-^

Recorded Holder DOME EXPLORATION (CANADA) LIMITED

Township or AreaCORLESS AND DENT TOWNSHIPS

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical 40

2Q

Other riays

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

fipologir?! days

Gfinrhemiral riays

Man days CD Airborne d!

Special provision La Ground Q

[~l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

d Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

KRL 621801 621804 to 809 inclusive 621811 to 813 inclusive 621817 to 824 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

30 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC 2 0 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC15 DAYS MAGNETOMETER 10 DAYS MAGNETOMETER

KRL 621803-10-14-15-16 KRL 621802

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

( J not sufficiently covered by the survey 1 _ 1 Insufficient technical data filed

KRL 621825

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows; Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77(19) 60:

B28 (83/6)

Ministry ofNaturalResources

'i rio

1984 07 11 Your File: 84-18Our File: 2.6559

Mr. Albert Scott RivettMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesOntario Government BuildingBox 324Red Lake, OntarioPOV 2MO

Dear Sir:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

fours sincerely,

Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

S. Hurst:mc

Ends.

cc: Dome Exploration (Canada) Limited Box 270, l First Canadian Place Toronto, Ontario M5X l HI

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 8 Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

845

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1984 07 11

2.6559/84-18

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 (82/5)

1984 04 05 Your Filei Our Files 2.6559

Albert Scott RivettMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesOntario Government BuildingBox 5003Red Lake, OntarioPOV 2MO

Dear Sir:

We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims KRL 621801 et al in the Townships of Corless fi Dent.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be issued.

We do not have a copy of the report of work which is normally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto,Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-6918

A.Barr:me

cc: Dome Exploration (Canada) Limited P.O. Box 270 l First Canadian Place Toronto, Ontario M5X 1H1 Attention: Ed Pigulski

March 27, 1984

P.O. Box 2701 First Canadian PlaceToronto, OntarioM5X1H1(416)364-3453Telex 065-24590Telecopier 366-1775

Our Project No. 231

Dome Exploration (Canada) Limited

Executive Office

DELIVER

Mr. Fred W. Matthews Supervisor, Projects Section Lands Administration Branch Ministry of Natural Resources Room 6450, Whitney Block Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1X1

Re: Mining Claims KRL.621801 to 621825 incl. ____- Corless Township (M. 2154)

Dear Mr. Matthews:

We enclose herewith, in duplicate, a report and plans by Geosearch Consultants Ltd. (W. R. Thompson), covering an electromagnetic and magnetic survey performed on the above-noted 25 claims located in the Red Lake Mining Division.

This submission is made under the Special Provisions Regulations as to 60 days per claim.

Enclosed is a copy of the Report of Work which we forwarded to the Mining Recorder in Red Lake, Ontario.

it to me.Please date-stamp the enclosed copy of this letter and return

Yours very truly,

DOME EXPLORATION (CANADA) LIMITED

EAP:ts Enclosures

c.c. Mr. Scott Rivett

c^-/Edward A. Tigulski Assistant Secretary^ p- f*

MININ;

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

t/3sa u

Type of Survey (s).

Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s)—

Electromagnetic gtnd Magnetic Corless and Dent Twps.—-—-—-——— Dome Exploration (Canada) Ltd*

Survey Company Geosearch Consultants Ltd*Author of Report W. H. Thompson

Address of Author.Suite 700 - 88 University Ave.

i O l^O 11 vO f vllt A.l 3.0

Covering Dates of Survey Sept, 12 to Nov. 4, 1(tinecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Cut W . k Km——————

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey,

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

—Electromagnetic . 40 Magnptnmptpr 2O

—Radiometric——————Other.———^^——

DAYS per claim

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic, . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

DATF.- Nov. 4 f 1983 SIGNATURE:.Author bf Report or Agtnt

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

....JU8L.............&K1.8.Q1......(prefix) (number)

.621&Q&.621803621805

" 621807.'.'...............tei&Qa." 621809.'.'...............&21&1Q." 621811

.........6.21&12.." 621813 JJ...............&21&1/4.." 621815

JJ

" 621817 .JJ...............621S1&.

" 621819 ..U...............&21&3G.

" 621821

621823

*'" : '' J '-' O i-,/:

'G J/f,'r." f; ," ' "'''' •f:-^-

TOTAL CLAIMS

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS - If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

INDUCED POLARIZATION

PFSISTIVITY GRAVITY ELECTROMAGNETIC MAGNETIC

fsliimhprnf Statjnns 1380

Station interval 25m

Profile sralr lcm to 10#

fVmtniir interval 100 gamma

Instrument Se in t rex Model MP2

Mag 1380N,,mhPr of Readings EM 1380

Line spacinp 100m

Total Field Proton Magnetometer

Arrnrary — Srale ronstant 1 gamma

Diurnal mrrertinn methorl Proton magnetometer recorder at 60 second intervals

Base Station check-in interval (hours)Rase Station loration and value On L

Instrument Max Min TT

r.oj] configuration fio-Pi anarCoil separation 1 OOrn

Arrurary l?o

ine IN at T+75W, 60TT6 gammas.

Method: O F ixed transmitter D Shoot back CXlnline CD Parallel line Freqnenry 3555 Hz and 888 Hz

Parameters measured The vertical

Instrument

Scale constant

Torrertions made

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy-

Instrument

Method 1 1 Time Domain

Parameters — On time

- Off timeDelay time

— Integration time5 Power

Electrode array ————————————————

Electrode spacing . ——————————————

TVDC of electrode - .,..,. ,— —

(specify V.L.F. station)

in-phase and out-of-phase components ofthe secondary field

i- *

1 1 Frequency Domain

Frequency

Range

SELF POTENTIALInstrument—-—-—^^^^——-—^—-^—-——-^————————-.———————^—— Range.Survey Method —^^—————-^-——————^^—-——————-—.^—-——^——....——

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument———Values measured .Energy windows (levels)^——-————^———-^———.—^——.......—-——..^————.——

Height of instrument______________________________Background Count,

Size of detector-——-——^^————.—————-—.^-—-.—.—^-^^-.—.———.—-—..———.——.Overburden -—————^^—-————-——-..—--——.—————.-.^——.-—^—^———.——

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

QTJJERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey—————————————————————————

Instrument ___________________________Accuracy—-——————^^^——————-—-——-———————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AlRBQRNiiSURVE,YS Type of survey(s) ————

Instrumcnt(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy———^^—.^-————————-(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used—-^—-——-——-———^-----———--..——————————————

Sensor altitude.

Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area.———————-———-————-—^^-—-Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight_______ Method of Collection—————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———

Terrain..-——————

Drainage Development____________ Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent CD

p. p.m. D p. p. b. D

Cu, Pb,

Others—

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory Analysis

No. —-.-—-————.

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ^———

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——

Commercial Laboratory {- Name of Laboratory_ Extraction Method--—. Analytical Method —— Reagents Used —————

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

GeneraL General.

Copy For: Mr. Fred W. Matthews

Dome Exploration (Canada) P.O. BOX 270l . -4.^,1 1 First Canadian Place Limited Toronto, Ontario

M5X1H1 (416)364-3453

w . 9 7 1 QflA Telex 065-24590 ExecutiveOff.ee narcn t /, J.*O4 Telecopier 366-1775

REGISTERED

Mr. Scott RivettMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources Our Project No. 231P.O. Box 324Red Lake, OntarioPOV 2MO

Re: Mining Claims KRL.621801 to 621825 incl. - Corless Township (M.2154)_________

Dear Mr. Rivett:

Enclosed is a Report of Work covering an Electromagnetic and Magnetic Survey (60 days for each claim) performed by Geosearch Consultants Ltd. (W. H. Thompson), on 25 mining claims as shown on the Report.

We will be delivering the survey report and plans, in duplicate, today or tomorrow at the latest to Mr. Fred W. Matthews.

This assessment work is being filed under the Special Provisions Regulations.

Yours very truly,

DOME EXPLORATION (CANADA) LIMITED

Edward A. Pigulski Assistant Secretary

EAP:tsEnclosures

c.c. Mr. Fred W. Matthews

,,.vf '(Vi" i

MinistryolNaturalResources

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Mining Act

Instructions: — Please type or print.- If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may b e e nteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type Of Survey(s)

— Electromagnetic -and—MagneticClaim Holder(s)

Township or Area

Dome Exploration (Canada) Limited-Corless A Dent Tw

;Prospector*s Licence No.

1 A 21304Address

Box 270, l First Canadian Place, Toronto, Ont. M5X 1111Survey Company

Geosearch Consultants Ltd.Name and Address of Author (o* Geo-Technicai report)

____V* H, Thompson, Suite 700 - 88 University Aye., Toronto, Onto M5J 1T6

Date of Survey ("from 81 to) iTotal Miles of line Cut

l^v l fto. ifil3 Ay i Ui 93 ' 37.4km

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

i i

For each additional survey: ; using the same grid: i

Enter 20 clays (for each) ;

Days perClaimGeophysical i

- Electromagnetic ; ZjQ

- Magnetometer 2 O(————

- Radiometric

- Other

: Geologicall

Geochemical

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Days per Claim

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions j Electromagnetic credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys. Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days perClaim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)IV

Prefix

KRL

ining CiaimNumber

621801621802621803621804621805621806621807621808621809621810621811621812

r 621813-.^. 621814 621815

h 621816621817

..621818-,..

. 621 819.. -

v 621821

621822

Expend.Days Cr.

——— ——

- ————

--,/r

P*V

Iff't V k

(VPrefix

KRL

f\

rXf

,,,,,t - D

inmg Claim

Number

621824621825. — .. -.

— — —————

... . . . .. ..

^*^\)

JV

\i\trr-*

bv T-r.TTJO:?

Expend.Days Cr,

- --- ——

y-

-— --Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

Date Recorded

Date Approved as Recorded

Mining Recorder

Branch Director

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person CertifyingW. H. Thompson, Suite 700 - 88 University Ave., Toronto, Onto M5J 1T6

Date CertifiedNov. 4, 1983

Sigrfe^ure)

1362 (81/9)

Assessment Work Breakdown

Man Days are based on eight (8) hour Technical or Line-cutting days. Technical days include work performed by consultants, draftsmen, etc..

Type of Survey

Technical Days Credits

Line-cutting Days Total Credits

Days per Claim

x 7

X 7

v/ y '/ Wp•wy y '7 vX vX

v/ x X/9 X

y x tt* xx

y x x•

/f x x/Z x x

x x/'r,/

C/}ro 4-

Dif*•^

H

Skinner Twp. - M.2205

. —.,

77549^ 7V7549I

7'7?440 l 775439| 1775434

KRL IKRL

7J754II |775408 |775405

KHL

77544.-E . 776437

,'768927,768926,7689275

. 7688*48*T68I3H T689S2 768933 * 768857 1768858

768864 V176886362l82462(l8 |62 i P l7/168935

L i KRL'~S\ KR~L

63^934L—ft. 62 1949

_ -A _ _ i -^ _ _ .'KRL IKRL

in inCVJ

Q.

h-

cO)Q

Knott Twp. - M.24722.6559 CORLESS 300

THE TOWNSHIP OF

CORLESSDISTRICT OF

KENORA-PATRICIA PORTION

RED LAKE MINING DIVISION

SCALE: 1 -INCH-4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALE

LEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

ROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYS

RAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEG

MINESCANCELl-EDPATENTED S.R.C.

c.s.

Loc.L.O.

M.R.O. S.R.O

NOTES400' Surface Rights Reservation along the shpres of all lakes and rivers.

DATE OF ISSUE

JUIJ 2 i 12E4

Ministry of Neiural ResourcTQfiQMTft

PLAN NO M-2I54

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

onro 4-

o oDC

mCO CO

I-

cr

17 OJLO

Q

i -D3- Oinn

-**y -n

J

- 3 ? k O (* tt(* i/^

ftc^A

i ix- ?r3

-f g

r- o

0 ** co

00o:N

mCT*m

pO.Cr*-*-O

of.-n3 *t-f

S. *li10 p

i 8S ^ 8 -t-* o

3 3 O- (Q

^ P

li

63lMl8

m

•l-l 0-4-

O-i 0-fc0-10-5

o-zxo-3

0-t . j! 0-2. O** j -/-l *)*0 '2.+1

O+o o-i

0+6 .0*2

1-1 0-3

0+C- *I-J

-i*n ri' -i-

0*0 . 0+3

CO o-' I

0-1 i.*l-3

0*0 Q*'

0+D , 0+3

O-i , *i*oo+o .. * 1*3 o+o O *o

O+O +J+0

o-i a -i-i 0*0 p *i*o

o+o {J o-i ir^ o+o t' *i*iJ;

o+o .1 o-i .— n^o

o-i o-3 *i*o .0*3

O -2 . .l O -5

0-3 -i-io

0-2 K > 0+0 I 0-0

o o+o o+o

O+o . -1+2-1*0 0*0

O-I . 0-Y

o+o o-i

*t*o O-i

- + ' *l* 0+0 -l-/

o-i ; .0-3o+o +1*0

0- p+0

DO ' i 0*0 O+o P* l

+I+0 *I*Q

O-I 0-1 0+0 *1'0

•*i*o . 0*0o+o -i+o

0+0 . -1+2

O-i , *|-3o+o 0*3

O-i , o-a

1*1 O -J l +0 O+0 0+0, Ot6i 0+-I

, iUO-4

0-2 \o-s

+I+0 ' vl-l

0+0 0*2

o-i 0*0

0+0 0+0

O *t-|. ^^ " O-I .-1-3 ,

-2 .

0 + 0 . 0*2

8 T, 6l S f H! O d

O m

O* m

S1 L O a-s m z ^8o-gi-s q? "ri Z f^t

l

o* Uo n

I S 3o

Lo

KRL.

6*

2120

662

1809

KR

L.

62IS

08

&2J

2IO

KR

L.

621805

s. ST

-a—

*-;

5N

___X

KRL.

62IS

25

6218

/7

6218

IG

CO

RL

ES

S

ST

WR

KN

OT

T

TW

P.

Lo

catio

n

Mop

Sca

le -

l i

nch

-K

i -k

mile

LEG

EN

DC

oil

Inte

rval

Fre

qu

en

cie

s

Pro

file

Scale

In-

PK

as*

——

Hia

h Fr

e^.

Read

ings

- R

igM

- of

Lin

e -

pho

ceD

OM

E

EXPL

OR

ATI

OIO

(C

AM

AD

A)

LIM

ITE

D

' PR

OJE

CTin

-pha

se

Low

Fre^

- Re

od/o

gs -

Leff o

f Li

neK

ey M

APC

OR

LE

SS

TW

P. O

NT

AR

IO

Oui

-of-

PK

ose

—,

I wea

k ,

'indefin

ite83

-235

Hig

h F

reo

Lo

w

Freo

lu

KRL

6218

23

LEG

END

Con

tour

in

terv

al .

. ..

. . ..

....

. 10

0 ga

mm

as

500g

amm

a co

ntou

r.,

100

gam

ma

cont

our.

Dep

ress

ion.

. ..

....

. ..

....

....

. /^

"

IN

STAT

IC rO

—

TO

TA

U F

IELD

*

A6

NE

TO

Me

.TC

R

by

GE

OS

CA

RC

H

OO

MS

OL

TA

WT

& P

P.

*0r-

DO

ME

eX

PL

OR

AT

lON

) (C

AN

AD

A)

LIM

ITE

D

PRO

JECT

231

K&

V M

AP

CO

RL

E3S

TW

R.O

WT

AR

IO

Sca

le.-,

i;

2.6559 CORLESS

230

OA

TC

- S

EP

T-

/M..H

.M-

83-2

36N

OR

TH