KYC compliance strategies that your customers will love
Transcript of KYC compliance strategies that your customers will love
KYC compliance strategies that your customers will love
Introducing:
Anthony Bracco PNC Bank
Greg Carmean Experian
©Experian 3 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
“Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
©Experian 4 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Common client problems Regulatory compliance and fraud detection
Need to use analytics,
automation and workflow
efficiencies to reduce
customer acquisition costs
and enhance customer
experience while
mitigating risk
Technology
Conducting KYC on
businesses and beneficial
owners to as well as
identifying shell companies,
shelf companies and
commercial identity theft can
be costly and both in dollars
and resources
Economic
Manual review and requests
for additional documentation
to meet regulatory
requirements may create
significant friction at the point
of sale
Customer
KYC violations carry billions
of dollars in criminal and civil
fines, possible jail time and
negative company press
Regulatory
Client problems
©Experian 5 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Anti-money laundering compliance challenges faced by organizations
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Budget constraints and increasedscrutiny of third-party reviews
Too many false positivescreening results
Insufficient/outdated technology
Having enough properly trained AML staff
Increased regulatory expectations andenforcement of current regulations
% of respondents
*Source: Dow Jones and ACAMS Global Anti-Money Laundering Survey 2016
©Experian 6 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
“The typical organization loses 5% of
revenues in a given year as a result of fraud”
“While the median duration of the frauds
in our study was 18 months, the losses rose
as the duration increased… schemes that
lasted more than five years caused a median
loss of $850,000”
Increased losses associated with fraudsters that penetrate your defenses
Source: Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and
Abuse 2016 Global Fraud Study
©Experian 7 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
“Three-fifths of chief executives said
they believed corporate brand and reputation
represented more than 40% of their company’s
market capitalization.”
“Executives with scandal-tainted companies
on their resumes pay a penalty on the job
market, even if they clearly had nothing
to do with the trouble. Overall, these executives
are paid nearly 4% less than their peers.”
Reputational exposure that can impact you and your company
Source: World Economic Forum
Source: The Scandal Effect — Harvard Business Review
September 2016
©Experian 8 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
• Balance customer experience with securing the right data to optimize your verification process
• Work with your vendor and compliance department to set responsible match cut offs
• Adopt a risk-based strategy, applying additional fraud checks to keep fraudsters out of your portfolio
There is no silver bullet Regulatory compliance and fraud prevention are complementary but require coordination
©Experian 9 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
• Business match rate is too low, requiring excessive manual review
• Current business verification process creates too much friction
• Insufficient staffing to do adequate CIP and fraud screening when acquiring new accounts
• Poor data quality
What is your biggest challenge in verifying business identities as part of your Customer Identification Program?
©Experian 10 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Identifying potential gaps
©Experian 11 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
“More than one-third of the institutions noted
that data quality and availability was one of
their top operational challenges relating to
their current CDD/KYC program”
“Of financial executives survey, 33% stated
that data quality was a significant challenge
in investigating crimes.”
Data quality
Source: NICE Actimize “Customer Due Diligence (CDD Market Survey”, June 2015)
Source: PWC Global Economic Crime Survey 2016 — Financial Services Industry Insights
©Experian 12 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Areas of exposure across the business enterprise
©Experian 13 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
• Intergroup and departmental communication
• Operational alignment
• Adequate staffing / training
• Budget management
• Policy alignment and governance
• Awareness of regulatory changes
What are your organizational KYC and fraud blind spots?
©Experian 14 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Operational optimization
©Experian 15 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
• Engage executive sponsorship
• Embrace a holistic customer view
• Collaborate across units / departments
• Optimize resources for remediation
Adopting an enterprise view of risk
©Experian 16 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
25% or greater ownership
10% or greater ownership
Other
At what level of ownership does your company currently screen beneficial owners?
©Experian 17 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Data collection practices
• Redundant input fields
• Lack of field validation leading to dirty or incomplete data
• Failure to collect business and DBA name; physical and billing address
Delays due to highly manual processes
• Limited use of automation and analytics
• Multiple vendor lookups
• Delays in obtaining hard copy documentation (e.g., utility bills)
Potentially preventable reasons for customer friction
©Experian 18 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Beneficial owner matching
• Comprehensive consumer bureau coverage (over 200 million credit active U.S. consumers)
• Broad coverage yields high match rates (95%+) using very tight matching parameters
• Verification results are often cross-referenced to SSN, accommodating name variations on bureau files
Complexities in authenticating business vs. beneficial owner identities
Challenges to customer experience:
• Identification and verification of potentially multiple beneficial owners to meet FinCEN final rule
• 47% – percentage of institutions verify beneficial ownership down to the 25% level
• 26% – percentage of institutions verify beneficial ownership down to the 10% level*
*Source: Dow Jones and ACAMS Global Anti-Money Laundering Survey 2016
©Experian 19 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Business identities
• Complex identifiers more challenging
– TaxIDs: Federal and State (the government doesn’t make FEINs readily available)
– Name: Legal and trade
– Address: Headquarters/branch, parent/subsidiary
• Different business structures (i.e., corporations vs. sole proprietors)
• Names may include special characters (e.g., @, &, etc.) impacting matching
Complexities in authenticating business vs. consumer identities
Branch location Branch location
Headquarters
©Experian 20 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Most verification vendors will provide a measure of match confidence to enable automated match thresholds:
• Single numeric value (1-100 where higher scores indicate stronger match)
• Match codes that identify quality of match in addition to other attributes (e.g., current vs. previous address, branch vs. HQ location, number of sources matched, etc.)
• Probabilistic match score that provides proximity between the input data and data on file
Meeting your match Setting automated verification thresholds
©Experian 21 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Example of business verification thresholds Scale 1–100*
Consultation
with your
compliance
department
can help set
appropriate
cut offs
Perfect: 100 score – character-for-character match
Direct hit: 99 score – missing “Inc” in name and suite number
Direct hit: 93 score – slight name differences, different suite number
©Experian 22 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
New commercial search and match systems enhanced by “Big Data” search technologies impact on automated verification
• Impact on automated verification
– Enables higher match rates with greater precision
• Incremental high-confidence matches: 11%
• Records with improved match confidence: 5%
• Impact on manual review
– Enables interactive free-from searching (e.g., Google)
– Allows minimal search criteria, but provides greater precision as data is added
The impact of Big Data technology
©Experian 23 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Business identity matching
• Provide data that is as clean and complete as possible
• Many financial institutions will accept two of three commercial and three of four consumer verification fields as long as one of the fields is name
• Look for solutions that can verify business and owner in a single transaction
• Explore the use of probabilistic matching techniques
• Collect business legal names, DBAs, billing and physical address when possible – more effort on the front end can significantly reduce manual reviews
Improving commercial customer identification experience and outcomes
Branch location Branch location
Headquarters
One regional bank’s match rate went from 88% when submitting a single
name and address, to 96% when submitting two names (i.e., legal and
Doing Business As) and addresses (i.e., billing and physical)
©Experian 24 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Sample fraud and regulatory approach How fraud and verification products can work together to solve client problems
Automated verification
Manual verification
Account verified
No records found
Enhanced due diligence
Document submission
Approved
Expanded fraud, reputational and
compliance checks
High risk account
Enhanced due diligence
Low risk accounts
Enhanced automated verification
©Experian 25 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Business activity
• Inquiry activity
• Public record updates
• Trade activity
• Disputes
• Financial instability
Business structure
• LLCs
• Sole Props
• Nonprofits
Additional business risk indicators
©Experian 26 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
• Data sourcing and management
– Coverage
– Currency
– Credibility
• Technical capabilities
– Accessibility
– Matching
• Analytic expertise
• Thought leadership
Vendor assessment areas
©Experian 27 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
• Openness to new ideas and innovation
• Stay abreast of changes in the industry
• Press your comfort zone
• Conferences and industry organizations (ACAMS)
Seeking constant improvement
©Experian 28 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Expected outcomes
©Experian 29 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
• Higher customer satisfaction
• Reduced cost and man hours
• Reduced fraud losses
• Better understanding of fraud losses vs. charge offs
• Improved profitability
• Reduced regulatory exposure
Partnership pays
©Experian 30 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Balance customer experience with securing the right data to optimize your verification process
Work with your vendor and compliance department to set responsible match cut-offs
Adopt a risk-based strategy, applying additional fraud checks to keep fraudsters out of your portfolio
There is no silver bullet Regulatory compliance and fraud prevention are complementary but require coordination
©Experian 31 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Experian contact:
Greg.Carmean [email protected]
Questions and answers
©Experian 32 4/26/2017 Experian Public Vision 2017
Share your thoughts about Vision 2017!
Please take the time now to give us your feedback about this session.
You can complete the survey at the kiosk outside.
How would you rate both the Speaker and Content?