Kruyanshi Master, MSc - Cleveland Clinic
1
American Center for Reproductive Medicine Annual Summer Mentorship in Reproductive Medicine This document reflects the performance of the intern during the Summer Mentorship from July 05 to August 02, 2019 This is to attest that the intern, Kruyanshi Master, MSc has successfully completed the course work prescribed by the Cleveland Clinic’s American Center for Reproductive Medicine and was evaluated for Scientific Writing skills during the Mentorship program Scientific Writing Evaluation 12 th 1 st Assessment Criteria Marks % Marks Grade Keywords Literature search Outline Writing progress Regular written updates to Mentor 2 nd Assessment Criteria Marks % Marks Grade Review of key articles Writing progress Figures and diagrams EndNote library citations Regular written updates to Mentor 3 rd Assessment Criteria Marks % Marks Grade Significance and rationale of the scientific writing project is clearly defined Literature review is presented for understanding of scientific topic Design of structure and outline of scientific project is valid for the topic Results are clearly stated and Figures/Tables clearly convey intended information 16 8 12 16 20 80 40 60 100 80 C C A+ B B 12 60 B 12 60 B 12 60 B 20 100 A+ 20 100 A+ 16 80 B 12 60 C 16 80 B 18 90 A- Grading Scale: A+ (>96%), A (91-95%), A- (86-90%), B+ (81-85%), B (76-80%), B- (71-75%), C (70% is a fail) Dr. Ralf Henkel Chief Coordinator, Summer Mentorship August 02, 2019 OverallGrade: B (76.0%) Date American Center for Reproductive Medicine Dr. Ashok Agarwal Program Director
Transcript of Kruyanshi Master, MSc - Cleveland Clinic
American Center for Reproductive MedicineAnnual Summer Mentorship in Reproductive Medicine This document reflects the performance of the intern during the
Summer Mentorship from July 05 to August 02, 2019 This is to attest that the intern,
Kruyanshi Master, MSchas successfully completed the course work prescribed by the Cleveland Clinic’s American Center for
Reproductive Medicine and was evaluated for Scientific Writing skills during the Mentorship program
Scientific Writing Evaluation
12th
1st Assessment Criteria Marks % Marks Grade
Keywords Literature search Outline Writing progress Regular written updates to Mentor
2nd Assessment Criteria Marks % Marks Grade
Review of key articles Writing progress Figures and diagrams EndNote library citations Regular written updates to Mentor
3rd Assessment Criteria Marks % Marks Grade
Significance and rationale of the scientific writing project is clearly defined Literature review is presented for understanding of scientific topic Design of structure and outline of scientific project is valid for the topic Results are clearly stated and Figures/Tables clearly convey intended information
168121620
804060
10080
CC
A+B
B
12 60 B12 60 B12 60 B20 100 A+20 100 A+
16 80 B
12 60 C
16 80 B
18 90 A-
Grading Scale: A+ (>96%), A (91-95%), A- (86-90%), B+ (81-85%), B (76-80%), B- (71-75%), C (70% is a fail)
Dr. Ralf Henkel Chief Coordinator, Summer Mentorship
August 02, 2019
Overall Grade: B (76.0%)
Date American Center for Reproductive Medicine
Dr. Ashok Agarwal Program Director
buchanb
Typewritten Text
A+
statagari
Typewritten Text
statagari
Typewritten Text
statagari
Typewritten Text
statagari
Typewritten Text
statagari
Typewritten Text
statagari
Typewritten Text
statagari
Typewritten Text
statagari
Typewritten Text
statagari
Typewritten Text
statagari
Typewritten Text
