Kromatografi Lapis Tipis
-
Upload
genesintus-londa -
Category
Documents
-
view
120 -
download
0
Transcript of Kromatografi Lapis Tipis
KROMATOGRAFI LAPIS TIPIS(KLT)
THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY
(TLC)
TLC
• Thin layer chromatography (TLC) is an important technique for identification and separation of mixtures
• It is useful in:– Identification of components of a mixture (using appropriate
standards)– following the course of a reaction,– analyzing fractions collected during purification,– analyzing the purity of a compound.
• In TLC, components of the mixture are partitioned between an adsorbent (the stationary phase, usually silica gel, SiO2) and a solvent ( the mobile phase) which flows through the adsorbent
Forensic Analysis using Thin Layer Chromatography
• Ink analysis– Determines the specific chemicals – Uses organic solvents – Results are compared to a database of pen
ink
Forensic Analysis using Thin Layer Chromatography
• Dye analysis– Fibers
• Significant evidence • Use thin layer
chromatography to determine the different dyes in the fiber
– See how the colors elute
Forensic Analysis using Thin Layer Chromatography
• Pesticide analysis–Pesticides are a hazard to the
environment–Many deaths are the results of
poisoning from pesticides–Pesticides are classified by their use or
chemical type–Determination of organophosphorus
compounds in pesticide
Forensic Analysis using Thin Layer Chromatography
• Organic acid analysis –Separation of carboxylic acids–Organic acids are in textile, food
preservatives, and medical agents
THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY
In TLC, a plastic, glass or aluminum sheet is coated
with a thin layer of silica gel.
A very small amount of a solution of the substance to be analyzed is applied in a small spot with a capillary tube, ~1cm from the bottom of the
TLC plate
The TLC is developed in a chamber which contains the developing solvent
(the mobile phase). A truncated filter paper placed in the chamber serves to saturate the chamber with mobile phase.
A B CU D
A B CU
filter paper
D
TLC ProceduresPlate preparation
• Mix the absorbent, water and a binder such as calcium sulfate– Silica gel, paper and alumina
• Spread a thin layer of absorbent on an unreactive hard surface– Glass, plastic, thick aluminum
• Heat in oven at 110°C for 30 mins to activate and dry the plate
TLC Procedure
• Place a small amount of solvent in a beaker
• In pencil, draw a straight line across the plate about 1 cm from the end of the plate
• Place a drop of sample solution on the line
TLC procedure
• Add filter paper
• Place in solvent
• Sealed container
How TLC works
• Sample solution is dissolved by solvent• The solution sample will travel at different
distances based on solubility, polarization, size
• Silica gel– Polar substances do not move far– Non polar substances move farther up the plate
RO
SiO
SiO
SiO
R
OH OH OH
R RR
Calibration/Standards TLC
• No calibration
• Standards– Compare to other known substances
– Rf value
Solvents
• Choose a solvent depending on the polarity of the compound
• Least Polar
• More polar
Petroleum ether
Cyclohexane
Toluene
Chloroform
Acctone
Ethanol
Methanol
Solvents
– The solvent can be a mixture of compounds but the polar solvent properties will over take the non-polar one.
• 10-30% Methly tert-butyl ether, MTBE, in hexane, C6H14, works well
• 10-30% Methylene chloride, CH2Cl2, in hexane, C6H14, for a less polar mixture
• 10-30% Acetone, CH3COCH3, in Methylene chloride, CH2Cl2, for a more polar mixture
– Trial and error is the best way to approach which solvent to use.
Visualization
• Destructive visualization – Spray plate with H2SO4, and then bake in the oven at
110ºC for 15-20 minutes. Compound is destroyed but all spots will be visible
• Nondestructive visualization – because of the use of a UV light the sample will not be destroyed. Although, not all of the spots on the plate will be visible.
– Long wave UV– Short wave UV– Semi-destructive visualization
Visualization
A plate under a UV light to display the compounds after they were developed
Interpretation
V alu e R D is tan ceF ro n t S o lv en t
T rav e ledS p o t th a t th eD is tan cef
Value R DistanceFront Solvent
TraveledSpot that theDistancef
Calculate Rf Value
Rf Value
– The Rf value needs to be between 0.0 and 1.0• If the value is over 1.0 or less than 0.0, the
calculation is wrong (you goofed)
– If the Rf value is greater than 0.8 or lower than 0.2 the values are hard to interpret, thus creating a larger error
– The best Rf values are 0.3 to 0.6
Rf Value
• The Rf value is not informative
• What affects the Rf value?
– Temperature– Solvent– Thickness and amount of spot– Other compounds
THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHYCalculation of Rf’s
The Rf is defined as the distance the center of the spot moved divided by the distance the solvent front moved (both measured from the origin)
A B CU
x xx x
Solvent Front
Origen
Distance solvent migrated = 5.0 cm
Distance A migrated = 3.0 cm
Distance B migrated = 2.0 cm
Distance C migrated = 0.8 cm
0.8 cm
3.0 cm
Rf (A) =
Rf (B) =
Rf (C) =
Rf (U1) =
Rf (U2) =
2.0 cm5.0 cm
= 0.40
= 0.60
= 0.16
= 0.60
= 0.16
3.0 cm5.0 cm
0.8 cm5.0 cm
3.0 cm5.0 cm
0.8 cm5.0 cm
Dx
Rf (D) = = 0.804.0 cm5.0 cm
4.0 cm
THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHYCalculation of Rf’s
The Rf is defined as the distance the center of the spot moved divided by the distance the solvent front moved (both measured from the origin)
A B CU
x xx x
Solvent Front
Origen
Distance solvent migrated = 5.0 cm
Distance A migrated = 3.0 cm
Distance B migrated = 2.0 cm
Distance C migrated = 0.8 cm
0.8 cm
3.0 cm
Rf (A) =
Rf (B) =
Rf (C) =
Rf (U1) =
Rf (U2) =
2.0 cm5.0 cm
= 0.40
= 0.60
= 0.16
= 0.60
= 0.16
3.0 cm5.0 cm
0.8 cm5.0 cm
3.0 cm5.0 cm
0.8 cm5.0 cm
Dx
Rf (D) = = 0.804.0 cm5.0 cm
4.0 cm
Rf values can be used to aid in the identification of a substance by comparison to standards.
The Rf value is not a physical constant, and comparison should be made only between spots on the same sheet, run at the same time.
Two substances that have the same Rf value may be identical; those with different Rf values are not identical.
THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY – Rf’s
Absorption of Solutes
The adsorption strength of compounds increases with increasing polarity of functional groups, as shown below:
-CH=CH2, -X, -OR, -CHO, -CO2R, -NR2, -NH2, -OH, -CONR2, -CO2H. (weakly adsorbed) (strongly adsorbed) (nonpolar) (more polar)
THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY – Rf’s
Elution Strength of Mobile Phase (Elution strength is generally considered to be equivalent to polarity. A solvents elution strength depends on Intermolecular Forces between the solvent and the analytes and between the solvent and the stationary phase.
A more polar (or more strongly eluting solvent) will move all of the analytes to a greater extent, than a less polar, weakly elution solvent.
For example, the elution strength of hexane is very low; = 0.01. the elution strength of ethyl acetate is higher; = 0.45 the elution strength of ethanol is even higher; = 0.68
Solvent MF MW
Bp (oC) Density (g/mL)
Hazards* Dipole Elution Stength
() Hexane CH3(CH2)4CH3
C6H14 86.17
68.7 0.659
Flammable Toxic
0.08 0.01
Toluene C6H5CH3
C7H8
92.13 110.6 0.867
Flammable Toxic
0.31 0.22
Diethyl ether CH3CH2OCH2CH3
C4H10O 74.12
34.6 0.713
Flammable Toxic, CNS Depressant
1.15 0.29
Dichloromethane CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2 84.94
39.8 1.326
Toxic, Irritant Cancer suspect
1.14 0.32
Ethyl Acetate CH3CO2CH2CH3
C4H8O2 88.10
77.1 0.901
Flammable Irritant
1.88 0.45
Acetone CH3COCH3
C3H6O 58.08
56.3 0.790
Flammable Irritant
2.69 0.43
Butanone CH3CH2COCH3
C4H8O 72.10
80.1 0.805
Flammable Irritant
2.76 0.39
1-Butanol CH3CH2CH2CH2OH
C4H10O 74.12
117.7 0.810
Flammable Irritant
1.75 0.47
Propanol CH3CH2CH2OH
C3H8O 60.09
82.3 0.785
Flammable Irritant
1.66 0.63
Ethanol CH3CH2OH
C2H6O 46.07
78.5 0.789
Flammable Irritant
1.70 0.68
Methanol CH3OH
CH4O 32.04
64.7 0.791
Flammable Toxic
1.7 0.73
Water HOH
H2O 18.02
100.0 0.998
1.87 >1
Solvent Properties and Elution Strengths
Elution Strength of Mixed Solvents
The elution strength of the mixture is assumed to be the weighted average of the elution strengths of the components:
onet = o
A (mole % A) +oB (mole % B)
where: mole % A = (moles A) / (moles A + moles B)
Thus, to determine the onet of a solvent mixture, the molar ratio of the solvents must first
be calculated. For example, the onet of a solvent mixture prepared from 1.0 mL of ethyl
acetate plus 9.0 mL of hexanes is calculated as shown below:
onet = oEtOAc [(moles EtOAc)/(moles EtOAc+moles hexane)] +
ohexane [(moles hexane)/(moles EtOAc+moles hexane)] where: moles EtOAc = [(volume EtOAc) (density EtOAc)] / [molecular weight of EtOAc]
thus: onet = {0.45[(1.0mLEtOAc)(0.902g/mL)/(88.11g/mole)]+0.01[(9.0mLhexane)
(0.659g/mL)/86.18g/mole)]} {(1.0 mLEtOAc)(0.902g/mL)/88.11g/mole) + (9.0 mLhexane)(0.659g/mL)/86.18g/mole)}
and onet = 0.067
Resolution
The separation between two analytes on a chromatogram can be expressed as the resolution, Rs and can be determined using the following equation:
Rs = (distance between center of spots) (average diameter of spots)
In TLC, if the Rs value is greater than 1.0, the analytes are considered to be resolved.
x x
Improving Resolution:
For two closely migrating components, optimum resolutions are usually obtained when the Rf’s of both compounds are between 0.2 and 0.5
* To Improve Rs, change the elution strength of the solvent to optimize Rf’s
• change onet (= in capacity factor), all compounds will be effected similarly.
• Alter the composition of the solvent system so that the components affinity for the mobile phase vs. the solid phase are differentially changed (= change in selectivity). • Changing the chemical nature of the solvent system,
such as changing a hydrogen bonding solvent to a solvent which cannot hydrogen bond to the analyte, is often the most effective.
** Improve Rs by decreasing the diameter of the analyte spots. This can be achieved by applying smaller and less concentrated spots.
http://orgchem.colorado.edu/hndbksupport/TLC/TLCprocedure.html
Pros for TLC
• Sensitivity • Speed• Inexpensive
Cons for TLC
• Too little of sample• Too much of sample• Subjective
KLT 2 DIMENSI
TLC – Stationary Phases
www.vwr.com
www.vwr.com
PREPARATIVE TLC (PTLC)
DIKEROK
DILARUTKAN
DIUAPKAN
DIDAPAT ZAT MURNI
TLC - Optimizing for column chromatography
Optimum: 0.2 < Rf < 0.5