Kritks

download Kritks

of 19

Transcript of Kritks

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    1/19

    Put the K in debate

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    2/19

    Challenges the assumptions of the aff Similar to a cp in its function and purpose

    Offers an alternative that corrects the flawedassumptions of the aff

    Generally does not involve governmentaction

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    3/19

    Epistemology-study of knowledge Ontology-study of being

    Deontology-morality based on duty andobligation to rule

    Utilitarianism- Greatest good for the greatestnumber

    Postmodernism-period of philosophy andacademia, instability and uncertainty ofmeaning, critical of modern philosophy

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    4/19

    Epistemology-study of knowledge

    How do we acquire knowledge?

    What qualifies as knowledge?

    What is the relationship between knowledge,

    belief, and truth?

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    5/19

    Ontology-study of being

    sub branch of philosophy under metaphysics

    What actually exists?

    What does it mean to exist?

    What is the meaning of existence?

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    6/19

    Deontology-morality based on duty andobligation to rule

    Categorical imperative The result of the action is less important than

    the justification and reason for acting

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    7/19

    Utilitarianism- Greatest good for the greatestnumber

    Most policy affs operate under a utilitarianframework

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    8/19

    Postmodernism-period of philosophy andacademia, instability and uncertainty of

    meaning, critical of modern philosophy Embraces new fields of study Psychology, science, sociology, etc.

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    9/19

    Greater argument diversity

    Develops skills not used in traditional debate

    Still trips some teams up

    Talking about assumptions and justificationsis important

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    10/19

    Link

    Impact

    alternative

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    11/19

    Links to the assumptions of the aff Aff reinforces X

    Aff props up X Aff engages in X

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    12/19

    Perms of the K are essentially no linkarguments

    Proves that plan action and alt are notmutually exclusive

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    13/19

    Function similar to policy impacts, but vary intype

    extinction No value to life Ethics Dehumanization Systemic impacts

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    14/19

    Non government action Rethink/withdrawal

    Change mindset/approach Somewhat abstract Requires strong explanation

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    15/19

    Gateway issue Test the theoretical legitimacy of the aff

    Does the neg have to offer a competitivepolicy option? More judges are willing to let teams leverage

    than advantages than outright rejecting the k

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    16/19

    Links and impacts are different

    Alternative

    Moves away from government action andconsequentialism and focuses more onjustification

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    17/19

    Not the same as researching policyarguments

    Use primary sources Project muse and other academic search

    engines See what other authors right about the issue

    or author in question

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    18/19

    Practice Understand the philosophy

    Understand the story write overviews Break it down in the same way you break

    down policy arguments

  • 7/29/2019 Kritks

    19/19

    Role of the ballot

    K is a prerequisite

    Ethics first

    Root cause