Krashen材料
-
Upload
amyzhangli -
Category
Education
-
view
7 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Krashen材料
KrashenKrashen
Dr. Swathi VanniarajanDr. Swathi Vanniarajan
LLD270: Second Language AcquisitionLLD270: Second Language Acquisition
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Krashen’s Input Hypothesis ModelKrashen’s Input Hypothesis Model
Known by various namesKnown by various names Monitor hypothesisMonitor hypothesis Input modelInput model Comprehensible input modelComprehensible input model Natural modelNatural model
All these names refer to the one and the All these names refer to the one and the same modelsame model
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Five hypothesesFive hypotheses
Acquisition – learning distinction Acquisition – learning distinction hypothesishypothesis
Natural sequence/order hypothesisNatural sequence/order hypothesis Monitor hypothesisMonitor hypothesis Comprehensible input hypothesisComprehensible input hypothesis Affective filter hypothesisAffective filter hypothesis
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Acquisition-Learning Distinction HypothesisAcquisition-Learning Distinction HypothesisAcquisitionAcquisition LearningLearning
Subconscious – implicit Subconscious – implicit learninglearning
A distinct process – can A distinct process – can never become learningnever become learning
The way children learn The way children learn the languagethe language
Meaning focusedMeaning focused InductiveInductive Naturalistic settingsNaturalistic settings
Conscious – explicit Conscious – explicit learninglearning
A distinct process – can A distinct process – can never become acquisitionnever become acquisition
The way adults learn the The way adults learn the languagelanguage
Grammar (form) focusedGrammar (form) focused DeductiveDeductive Formal settingsFormal settings
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
CriticismsCriticisms
Subconscious – conscious is a psychological Subconscious – conscious is a psychological processprocess
It is possible they are two endpoints in a It is possible they are two endpoints in a continuum (for Krashen, learning cannot become continuum (for Krashen, learning cannot become acquisition and vice versa)acquisition and vice versa)
Confusion between learning settings and Confusion between learning settings and psychological processespsychological processes
Problem in defining what a formal setting isProblem in defining what a formal setting is Research shows that children are not the best Research shows that children are not the best
language learnerslanguage learners Experimental verification is impossibleExperimental verification is impossible
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Current research opinion on Current research opinion on acquisition – learning distinctionacquisition – learning distinction
Krashen may be correct – neurobiological Krashen may be correct – neurobiological findings in the last 3 or 4 years indicate that findings in the last 3 or 4 years indicate that there are two kinds of knowledge – declarative there are two kinds of knowledge – declarative (what) and procedural (how).(what) and procedural (how).
Originally they were considered to be two sides Originally they were considered to be two sides of the same coin.of the same coin.
They have been shown to be two entirely They have been shown to be two entirely different processesdifferent processes
It is possible that children acquire language It is possible that children acquire language procedurally from the start whereas adults learn procedurally from the start whereas adults learn declarative knowledge and then try to convert it declarative knowledge and then try to convert it into procedural knowledge.into procedural knowledge.
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Implications of Acquisition-Learning Implications of Acquisition-Learning Distinction HypothesisDistinction Hypothesis
Content based language teaching – total Content based language teaching – total immersion is preferable.immersion is preferable.
Provide meaningful contexts for Provide meaningful contexts for understanding languageunderstanding language
Provide meaningful communication Provide meaningful communication activities such as information gap activities such as information gap activities.activities.
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Natural (order) sequence hypothesisNatural (order) sequence hypothesis
Children learn language in a predictable Children learn language in a predictable sequence.sequence.
It is impossible to alter the course of It is impossible to alter the course of development since language acquisition, development since language acquisition, be it L1 or L2 is a UG driven process.be it L1 or L2 is a UG driven process.
Grammar teaching is a waste of time.Grammar teaching is a waste of time.
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Criticisms on natural sequence hypothesisCriticisms on natural sequence hypothesis
Natural sequence is a product of various Natural sequence is a product of various factors such asfactors such as Perceptual saliency (competition model)Perceptual saliency (competition model) Input frequency (connectionist and social Input frequency (connectionist and social
interactionist models)interactionist models) Syntactic complexitySyntactic complexity Cognitive transparencyCognitive transparency Artifact of methods and instruments usedArtifact of methods and instruments used Native language influenceNative language influence
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Criticisms on natural sequence hypothesis (contd.)Criticisms on natural sequence hypothesis (contd.)
The sequences are not identical though similar – The sequences are not identical though similar – the items that are learnt in L1 are also learnt the items that are learnt in L1 are also learnt earlier in L2earlier in L2
Accuracy order is not acquisition orderAccuracy order is not acquisition order The morphemes studied are only a tiny part of The morphemes studied are only a tiny part of
the languagethe language Total disregard for grammar had negative results Total disregard for grammar had negative results
in Canadian immersion programsin Canadian immersion programs It has been shown that teaching can somewhat It has been shown that teaching can somewhat
alter the sequence (noticeability – attention alter the sequence (noticeability – attention hypothesis)hypothesis)
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Implications of natural order hypothesisImplications of natural order hypothesis
Errors are developmental and are a Errors are developmental and are a natural byproduct of learning – tolerate natural byproduct of learning – tolerate them.them.
Allow learners to make errors and do not Allow learners to make errors and do not correct them correct them
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Monitor hypothesisMonitor hypothesis
Three conditions:Three conditions: Knowledge of grammarKnowledge of grammar
Focus on grammarFocus on grammar
Availability of timeAvailability of time
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Monitor hypothesisMonitor hypothesis
Grammar focused learning leads to Grammar focused learning leads to grammar focused productiongrammar focused production
Children do not monitor so why should Children do not monitor so why should adults?adults?
Learning language is different from Learning language is different from learning about language.learning about language.
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Criticisms on monitor hypothesisCriticisms on monitor hypothesis
Children do monitorChildren do monitor Children are not the best language Children are not the best language
learners.learners. The hypothesis is not falsifiable.The hypothesis is not falsifiable. Total disregard for grammar had negative Total disregard for grammar had negative
effects in the Canadian immersion effects in the Canadian immersion programs.programs.
Noticeability hypothesis – monitoring may Noticeability hypothesis – monitoring may in fact be good.in fact be good.
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Implications of monitor hypothesisImplications of monitor hypothesis
Model language and do not teach Model language and do not teach grammar explicitly.grammar explicitly.
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Comprehensible input hypothesisComprehensible input hypothesis
Vygotsky – Zone of proximal development (ZPD)Vygotsky – Zone of proximal development (ZPD) i + 1 (expanded, it means, the level of i + 1 (expanded, it means, the level of
interlanguage plus 1 level beyond)interlanguage plus 1 level beyond) Comprehension is sufficient and there is no Comprehension is sufficient and there is no
necessity for production (exposure to data will necessity for production (exposure to data will along work is the innatist position but Krashen’s along work is the innatist position but Krashen’s position is different from the innatist position in position is different from the innatist position in the sense that what Krashen proposes is not the sense that what Krashen proposes is not exposure to any data but to data that are simple exposure to any data but to data that are simple and comprehensible)and comprehensible)
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
No attention
Physical features based comprehension
Form based comprehension
Meaning based comprehension
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Comprehensible input hypothesis - criticismComprehensible input hypothesis - criticism
Imprecise terminology – impossible to come up Imprecise terminology – impossible to come up with operationalizable definitions, the level of the with operationalizable definitions, the level of the learner, 1 level, 2 levels, one level beyond – learner, 1 level, 2 levels, one level beyond – what are they?what are they?
Intuitively appealing but impossible to verify Intuitively appealing but impossible to verify Comprehensible output is as important as input Comprehensible output is as important as input
isis Comprehensible input cannot be a causal Comprehensible input cannot be a causal
variable since it is not given in all cultures.variable since it is not given in all cultures.
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Implications of input hypothesisImplications of input hypothesis
Employ teacher talk along motherese or Employ teacher talk along motherese or foreigner talkforeigner talk
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Affective filter hypothesisAffective filter hypothesis
Learners who suffer from anxiety or lack of Learners who suffer from anxiety or lack of motivation or negative attitude somehow motivation or negative attitude somehow switch off their comprehension switch off their comprehension mechanisms and so even if they are mechanisms and so even if they are provided comprehensible input, they will provided comprehensible input, they will not be able to process the input. Therefore not be able to process the input. Therefore a low affective filter is important.a low affective filter is important.
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
How does affective filter work?How does affective filter work?
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
The significance of affective filter hypothesisThe significance of affective filter hypothesis
Accounts for individual variationAccounts for individual variation Accounts for the differences between adult Accounts for the differences between adult
and child language acquisition processesand child language acquisition processes
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Criticisms on affective filter hypothesisCriticisms on affective filter hypothesis
A little anxiety is better than no anxiety at A little anxiety is better than no anxiety at all. all.
Motivation, attitude, anxiety – these may Motivation, attitude, anxiety – these may not be the cause but maybe the not be the cause but maybe the consequenceconsequence
A simple correlation (causal-result) cannot A simple correlation (causal-result) cannot be made between the affective variables be made between the affective variables and the language acquisition processand the language acquisition process
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Brain science and affective filter hypothesisBrain science and affective filter hypothesis
Brain scientists believe that affective Brain scientists believe that affective variables do play a role in human learning variables do play a role in human learning and that certain enzymes that are and that certain enzymes that are produced in the body while we are anxious produced in the body while we are anxious do prevent us from processing data.do prevent us from processing data.
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Implications of affective filter hypothesisImplications of affective filter hypothesis
Create a non-threatening Create a non-threatening teaching/learning atmosphere in the teaching/learning atmosphere in the classroom.classroom.
Provide a risk-safe environment.Provide a risk-safe environment. Students should not worry about being Students should not worry about being
criticized.criticized. Capitalize on what students already know.Capitalize on what students already know.
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Create teaching/learning environment in Create teaching/learning environment in such a way that students encounter such a way that students encounter success rather than failure.success rather than failure.
Provide positive and constructive Provide positive and constructive feedback.feedback.
Analyze your classroom behavior for any Analyze your classroom behavior for any hidden agendahidden agenda
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Krashen’s VariablesKrashen’s Variables
For Krashen, there are only two variables For Krashen, there are only two variables for language acquisition to take place:for language acquisition to take place: Abundant comprehensible inputAbundant comprehensible input Low affective filterLow affective filter
04/07/2304/07/23Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270 Dr. Swathi Vanniarajan, LLD 270
Krashen Krashen
Krashen – An evaluationKrashen – An evaluation
Major strength – intuitively appealingMajor strength – intuitively appealing Able to be translated into pedagogical modelsAble to be translated into pedagogical models Hybrid model and so draws strengths from Hybrid model and so draws strengths from
various theoriesvarious theories For the first time, somebody was able to say that For the first time, somebody was able to say that
grammar teaching was not goodgrammar teaching was not good Humanistic in its approachHumanistic in its approach ImpreciseImprecise Not verifiableNot verifiable Krashen’s dogmatic adherence to his Krashen’s dogmatic adherence to his
hypotheses is the major weakness.hypotheses is the major weakness.