Sheet1Personal DetailsEmp NameJoining DateJob TitleGradeAppraisal StatusAssessment Start DateAssessment End DateRaghava Pichikala04 Jul 2011Sr. Engineer - CAEL1.2Self Assessment Submitted01 Apr 201431 Mar 2015Next Action ExpectedReview PeriodReview DateReporting Manager to Start AssessmentFinal Review31 Mar 2015FinancialKPI DescriptionWtg(%)KPI TargetTraining Need Identifcation (TNIs)Self ScoreSelf JustificationBillable Work Hours per Quarter15>= 480 = 15, 380 to 480 hrs = 12, 250 to 380 =8, 140 to 250 = 6, Else = 015Q1 > 480

Q2 > 480

Q3 = 405( vacation for medical purpose)

Q4 > 480GrowthKPI DescriptionWtg(%)TargetTraining Need Identifcation (TNIs)Self ScoreSelf JustificationAverage CSR Rating10AvCSR>4.5 = 10, AvCSR 4-to-4.5 = 8, AvCSR 3.5-to-4 = 6, AvCSR 3-to-3.5 = 2, No CSR recd or Else = 010Average CSR for all the projects handled is more than 4.5.

Airbus-Germany.Business Acquisition SupportBusiness Acquisition casacaded to Team member by Team-Lead.5For L1.1 & L1.2No of collaterals/case studies developed = 1 per Q (certified by Bid Response or Sales Team) or Participation in RFP/Bids - quantify effort = 8 Hrs. per Q (certified by Bd Response or Sales Team) orDevelop presentations for Project/Group/LOB = 1 per Q (certified by EMs/ IHs/ THs) orAssist with customer visits/site visit coordination = 8 Hrs/ per Q (certified by Sales Team)

Up to L1.1Participation in New Customer/PO pilot submission ( Approved by PM)5Constantly involved in estimation of efforts for all idealization and meshing tasks. Involved in pilot project of zodiac.Negative Feedback (NF)CSRs cascaded to Team Member by Team Leader5No negative feedback = 5, Maximum Two Negative Feedback Suggesting Improvement = 2, More than 2 Negative Feedbacks or Single Severe Negative Feedback Affecting Buiness = 05no negative feedbackProcessKPI DescriptionWtg(%)TargetTraining Need Identifcation (TNIs)Self ScoreSelf Justification"New Skills or Competency Enhancement as validated by respective domain SMEEntered by the employee and approved by the Manager in MySkills."2. CFD - Automation process for ADE mesh generation before Q210New Skills acquired or Competency Enhancement done and used in project work = 10, New Skills acquired or Competency Enhancement done but not used = 6, No New Skills = 010Improvement in the expertise of Catia and ANSA. Applied the same for zodiac pilot project. Improved expertise of Fluent and CFD-post and used them in Haldex, Zodiac and even for case set-up of Aibrus Germany cases.1. Data management for all assigned CFD projects (need to provide evidence)2. Amend checklists (continuous improvement process) and maintain checklist for all assigned deliverables5Proactive =5, Done when told =3, Not Done =13done when toldApproved Productivity Improvement Idea (as approved by PM)1. Generate automation idea or process improvement ideas and document the same52 Approved Ideas = 5, 1 Approved Idea = 3, No Approved Idea = 05Generated a script in ANSA for numbering of Restrictor to copy to other positions and used the same in Generation of mesh for A350-1000 TZ-01 meshing which saved a lot of time.

Written journals for setting up the case and boundary conditions in fluent.

Generated a macro in Microsoft powerpoint presentation for pasting the images which was used during V-trap report preparation.Effort Variance (Estimated Vs Actual hours) (Check list or project tracking Designer Tables)1. Maintain individual task estimation, planned & actual efforts for all assigned CFD tasks5For All Projects : > -10% = 5 , -10 to 0 = 5, 1 to 10% = 2, and >10% =05All the projects were done according to the estimation.Knowledge Management (No. of Knowledge Documents approved by Project Managers submiited on GEM / KM System)1. Prepare 4 knowledge documents in FY152. Present 2 knowledge sharing sessions on technical topics in FY155Prepare 4 KM documents (as sole author) or 4 KM documents (as a co-author) =5,Prepare 2 Knowledge Documents (Co - author) = 3, None = 00no knowledge management documents were madeSchedule Variance (Check list or project tracking-Designer Tables)1. Maintain project estimation, planned & actual delivery scheduals for all assigned CFD tasks10For All projects : On/Before time = 10; Delay 1 to 5% = 6, Delay 5 to 10%= 4, Else = 010All the projects were delivered on or before deadlineWeighted External Defect Density (Number of defects) and Negative Feedbacks from customer(Check list or project tracking Designer Tables)1. Capture review comments & defects if any for all assigned CFD tasks10For All Projects : 1.0 WDD = 0

No negative feedback = 5, Number of NFs : 2 or less = 4, Number of NFs 3-to-4 = 2, >4 = 010No negative feedback has been from the customer. defended the same number of times when ever customer used to raise a defect.Tata Technologies Leadership CompetenciesKPI DescriptionWtg(%)TargetTraining Need Identifcation (TNIs)Self ScoreSelf JustificationDeveloping relationships: Builds effective long term relationships with business partners , i.e. customers, peers, functional /domain experts, alliance partners, negotiates effectively, and builds and leverages networks (Cluster - Business)5Manager will observe improvement on behavior and requisite attributes over the assessment period to make a comprehensive evaluation on both the strengths and consistency of these practices while achieving the KPIs and targets. Detailed document articulating quantifiable behavior and associated rating scale will be referred here5having a good relationship with the customers and peers which will help in developing the project execution.Execution Excellence: Ensures sustainable execution (results for tomorrow) though systems and process orientation, cost and quality consciousness, innovation and creativity, and knowledge sharing (Cluster - Results)5Manager will observe improvement on behavior and requisite attributes over the assessment period to make a comprehensive evaluation on both the strengths and consistency of these practices while achieving the KPIs and targets. Detailed document articulating quantifiable behavior and associated rating scale will be referred here5Always ready to involve in all the CFD projects and give improvement ideas that used to make the project execution quicker and smoother. Involved myself in Zodiac project and gave a lot of suggestions which helped the project execution and at the same time learnt a lot. Script generation in ANSA for Airbus Germany project, fluent for case set-ups and power-point for image formatting in report for V-trap.

The image formatting script was also used by Manik for ADE-1D projects.Personal Mastery: Role models integrity, self-belief and organizational commitment, builds trust and collaborates, is a continuous learner, deals with ambiguity, handles pressure and takes ownership (Cluster - Self)5Manager will observe improvement on behavior and requisite attributes over the assessment period to make a comprehensive evaluation on both the strengths and consistency of these practices while achieving the KPIs and targets. Detailed document articulating quantifiable behavior and associated rating scale will be referred here5took the ownership of all the airbus Germany projects and delivered them on or before deadline. A lot of pressure from Andreas has been handled in very though situations. Also defended the team whenever customer used to point out defects. Always ready for working in tough situations.Extra MilesKPI DescriptionWtg(%)TargetTraining Need Identifcation (TNIs)Self ScoreSelf JustificationCorporate Social Responsibility50Participating in CSR Activity minimum 2 in a year50participated in more than 2 CSR activities.Innovation50Focus on continous improvement with commercially viable ideas, processes, models leading to project profitablity and/or customer satisfaction0involved in generating innovative idea but not major one