Kowalczyk, et al. vs. Barbarite, et al - Verified Answer FLORA

download Kowalczyk, et al. vs. Barbarite, et al - Verified Answer FLORA

of 6

Transcript of Kowalczyk, et al. vs. Barbarite, et al - Verified Answer FLORA

  • 8/14/2019 Kowalczyk, et al. vs. Barbarite, et al - Verified Answer FLORA

    1/6

    9202-0052/dmf

    M CABE & MACK LLP, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, POST OFFICE BOX 509, POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12602C

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------x

    JOSEPH KOWALCZYK and ALIL PERICIC,

    Plaintiffs,

    -against-

    JOHN BARBARITE, SUE FLORA, GORDON JENKINS andTHE VILLAGE OF MONTICELLO, a municipality of theState of New York,

    Defendants.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------x

    ANSWER

    08 CIV 6992 (KMK)

    The defendant, Sue Flora, by her attorneys, McCabe & Mack LLP, as and for her

    answer to the complaint of the plaintiffs, respectfully shows to the court and alleges as

    follows.

    A. THE PARTIES

    1. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of

    the allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 1(a) and (b) of the complaint.

    B. JURISDICTION

    2. With regard to paragraphs numbered 3 and 4 of the compliant neither

    admits nor denies as states conclusions of law.

    D. RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES

    3. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of

    the allegations contained in paragraph numbered 6 of the complaint.

    4. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 7 of the

    complaint.

    Case 7:08-cv-06992-KMK Document 13 Filed 10/15/2008 Page 1 of 6

  • 8/14/2019 Kowalczyk, et al. vs. Barbarite, et al - Verified Answer FLORA

    2/6

    9202-0052/dmf

    M CABE & MACK LLP, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, POST OFFICE BOX 509, POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12602C

    E. FACTS RELATING TO KOWALCZYKS CLAIMS

    5. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of

    the allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 8, 17 and 19 of the complaint.

    6. With regard to paragraph numbered 9 of the complaint, admits only that

    plaintiff received permit #2646 and denies knowledge of information sufficient to form a

    belief as to the remaining allegations.

    7. With regard to paragraph numbered 10 of the complaint, neither admits nor

    denies and refer the court to the document for its content and import.

    8. With regard to paragraph numbered 11 of the complaint, admits only that

    plaintiff obtained a building permit for four additional apartments and denies knowledge or

    information sufficient to form a belief as to the remaining allegations.

    9. With regard to paragraph numbered 12 of the complaint, admits defendant

    Flora occasionally inspected plaintiffs premises.

    10. With regard to paragraph numbered 13 of the complaint, admits knowledge

    of one unannounced visit by John Barbarite and denies knowledge of any of the statements

    alleged to have been made by him.

    11. With regard to paragraph numbered 14 of the complaint, admits only that

    plaintiff received a conditional certificate of occupancy and refers the court to the document

    for its content and import and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as

    to the remaining allegations.

    12. With regard to paragraphs numbered 15 and 18 of the complaint, denies that

    she visited the premises at least every two weeks and denies knowledge or information

    sufficient to form a belief as to the remaining allegations.

    13. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief with respect to the

    Case 7:08-cv-06992-KMK Document 13 Filed 10/15/2008 Page 2 of 6

  • 8/14/2019 Kowalczyk, et al. vs. Barbarite, et al - Verified Answer FLORA

    3/6

    9202-0052/dmf

    M CABE & MACK LLP, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, POST OFFICE BOX 509, POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12602C

    alleged statements and notices and denies the remaining allegations contained in paragraph

    numbered 16 of the complaint.

    14. Denies those allegations contained in paragraph numbered 18 of the complaint.

    F. KOWALCZYKS CAUSES OF ACTION

    AS TO THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

    15. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 20 and 21 of

    the complaint.

    AS TO THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

    16. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 22 and 23 of

    the complaint.

    AS TO THE THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

    17. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 24, 25 and

    26 of the complaint.

    AS TO THE FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

    18. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 27 and 30 of

    the complaint.

    19. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of

    the allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 28 and 29 of the complaint.

    AS TO THE FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

    20. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 31, 32 and

    33 of the complaint.

    AS TO THE SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION

    21. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 34, 35 and

    36 of the complaint.

    Case 7:08-cv-06992-KMK Document 13 Filed 10/15/2008 Page 3 of 6

  • 8/14/2019 Kowalczyk, et al. vs. Barbarite, et al - Verified Answer FLORA

    4/6

    9202-0052/dmf

    M CABE & MACK LLP, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, POST OFFICE BOX 509, POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12602C

    G. Facts Relating to Pericics Claims

    22. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of

    the allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 37, 45 and 46 of the complaint.

    23. With regard to paragraph numbered 39 of the complaint, admits only that

    defendant Flora saw some work being performed after issuance of the permit and denies the

    remaining allegations.

    24. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 40 and 44 of

    the complaint.

    25. With regard to paragraph numbered 41 of the complaint, denies Flora visited

    the premises approximately every two weeks and denies knowledge or information sufficient

    to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations.

    26. With regard to paragraph numbered 42 of the complaint, admits only that

    plaintiff retained William Gill and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief

    as to the remaining allegations.

    27. With regard to paragraph 43 of the complaint, denies knowledge or

    information with respect to the alleged statements and denies the remaining allegations.

    AS TO THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (PERICIC)

    28. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 47 and 48 of

    the complaint.

    AS TO THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (PERICIC)

    29. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 49 and 50 of

    the complaint.

    AS TO THE THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (PERICIC)

    30. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 51, 52 and

    Case 7:08-cv-06992-KMK Document 13 Filed 10/15/2008 Page 4 of 6

  • 8/14/2019 Kowalczyk, et al. vs. Barbarite, et al - Verified Answer FLORA

    5/6

    9202-0052/dmf

    M CABE & MACK LLP, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, POST OFFICE BOX 509, POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12602C

    53 of the complaint.

    AS TO THE FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (PERICIC)

    31. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 54 and 55 of

    the complaint.

    AS TO THE FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION (PERICIC)

    32. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 56, 57 and

    58 of the complaint.

    AS TO THE SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION (PERICIC)

    33. Denies those allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 59 and 60 of the complaint.

    AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE(KOWALCZYKS CLAIMS)

    34. Defendant Flora acted in good faith and is entitled to qualified immunity.

    AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

    35. The entire complaint fails to state a claim against defendant Flora.

    AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

    36. The sixth cause of action fails to state a claim.

    AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE(PERICICS CLAIMS)

    37. The entire complaint fails to state a claim against defendant Flora.

    AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

    38. Defendant Flora acted in good faith and is entitled to qualified immunity.

    AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

    39. The sixth cause of action fails to state a claim.

    WHEREFORE, the defendant, Sue Flora, demands judgment dismissing the complaint

    Case 7:08-cv-06992-KMK Document 13 Filed 10/15/2008 Page 5 of 6

  • 8/14/2019 Kowalczyk, et al. vs. Barbarite, et al - Verified Answer FLORA

    6/6

    9202-0052/dmf

    M CABE & MACK LLP, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, POST OFFICE BOX 509, POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12602C

    of the plaintiffs herein, plus the costs and disbursements of this action and for such other and

    further relief as to the Court may seem just and proper.

    DATED: Poughkeepsie, New York October 14, 2008

    Yours, etc.

    McCABE & MACK LLP

    By:David L. Posner (0301)

    Attorneys for Defendant Sue Flora

    63 Washington StreetP.O. Box 509Poughkeepsie, NY 12602-0509Tel: (845) 486-6800

    TO: GERALD ORSECK, ESQ.ORSECK LAW OFFICES PLLC

    Attorneys for Plaintiffs1924 State Route 52PO Box 469Liberty, NY 12754

    RICHARD SKLARIN, ESQ.MIRANDA, SOKOLOFF, SAMBURSKY, SLONE& VERVENIOTIS LLP

    Attorneys for Defendants Barbarite, Jenkins and Village of Monticello570 Taxter RoadElmsford, New York 10523

    Case 7:08-cv-06992-KMK Document 13 Filed 10/15/2008 Page 6 of 6


Edinburgh Research Explorer€¦ · 62 et al., 2005; Costa et al., 2008; Wedley et al., 2011) and sick dogs (Carattoli et al., 2005; Pomba et 63 al., 2009; Gibson et al., 2011a),

Edinburgh Research Explorer€¦ · 62 et al., 2005; Costa et al., 2008; Wedley et al., 2011) and sick dogs (Carattoli et al., 2005; Pomba et 63 al., 2009; Gibson et al., 2011a),

Multi-scale assessment of human-induced changes to ... · (Neill et al. 2001; Davidson et al. 2004; Neill et al. 2006; Figueiredo et al. 2010; Neill et al. 2011; Macedo et al. 2013;

Multi-scale assessment of human-induced changes to ... · (Neill et al. 2001; Davidson et al. 2004; Neill et al. 2006; Figueiredo et al. 2010; Neill et al. 2011; Macedo et al. 2013;

EXHIBIT A2 - cases.justia.com · 811996 Konrad 1211996 Koppolu et al. 211997 Duscher et al. 311997 Koppolu et al. 511997 Koppolu et al. 711997 Ashe et al. 511998 Koppolu et al. 911998

EXHIBIT A2 - cases.justia.com · 811996 Konrad 1211996 Koppolu et al. 211997 Duscher et al. 311997 Koppolu et al. 511997 Koppolu et al. 711997 Ashe et al. 511998 Koppolu et al. 911998

Supporting Information for Kowalczyk et al. … · Macmillan Publishers Limited. ... Nup153 (602 aa) 8.85 37 43 6 + 11.3 Table T1. Theoretical pI values and charges of various proteins

Supporting Information for Kowalczyk et al. … · Macmillan Publishers Limited. ... Nup153 (602 aa) 8.85 37 43 6 + 11.3 Table T1. Theoretical pI values and charges of various proteins

Prof Kowalczyk

Prof Kowalczyk

Oceana et al vs.BOEM et al

Oceana et al vs.BOEM et al

AMT 13-2413-2020 - Copernicus.org · 2020. 7. 15. · et al., 2019; Feinberg et al., 2019; Gao et al., 2015; Jiao et al., 2016; Popoola et al., 2018; Yuval et al., 2019). Distributed

AMT 13-2413-2020 - Copernicus.org · 2020. 7. 15. · et al., 2019; Feinberg et al., 2019; Gao et al., 2015; Jiao et al., 2016; Popoola et al., 2018; Yuval et al., 2019). Distributed

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7895.275 B1 ... Gutta et al. Signes et al. Hashimoto et al. Ghashghai et al. Ting et al. Vaidyanathan et al. Obradovich Larsson et al.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7895.275 B1 ... Gutta et al. Signes et al. Hashimoto et al. Ghashghai et al. Ting et al. Vaidyanathan et al. Obradovich Larsson et al.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,792,177 B2 ...Gale et al. Asakura Neukermans et al. Laor Pan et al. Laughlin Hornbeck Gove et al. Neukermans et al. Neukermans et al.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,792,177 B2 ...Gale et al. Asakura Neukermans et al. Laor Pan et al. Laughlin Hornbeck Gove et al. Neukermans et al. Neukermans et al.

Mutanwad et al., 2019 · signaling (Swain et al. 2001; Tseng et al. 2001; Silverstone et al. 2007; Zentella et al. 2016; Zentella et al. 2017). One of the most prominent features

Mutanwad et al., 2019 · signaling (Swain et al. 2001; Tseng et al. 2001; Silverstone et al. 2007; Zentella et al. 2016; Zentella et al. 2017). One of the most prominent features

et al. 2015 Cultural... · Bain (1986) Morton et al. (1986) Bowles et al. (1988) Graham & Noonan (2010) Kremers et al. (2012) Crance et al. (2014) Musser et al. (2014) Topic Geographic

et al. 2015 Cultural... · Bain (1986) Morton et al. (1986) Bowles et al. (1988) Graham & Noonan (2010) Kremers et al. (2012) Crance et al. (2014) Musser et al. (2014) Topic Geographic

Ben Kowalczyk Senior Comprehensive Research Project

Ben Kowalczyk Senior Comprehensive Research Project

(12) United States Patent (io) · Sevcik et al. Ryanetal..... 144/154.5 Govindaraj et al. Kennedy et al. Malone Woods et al. Takahashi et al. Dick et al. Ceroll et al. Caron et al.

(12) United States Patent (io) · Sevcik et al. Ryanetal..... 144/154.5 Govindaraj et al. Kennedy et al. Malone Woods et al. Takahashi et al. Dick et al. Ceroll et al. Caron et al.

Troya et al Dooley et al Fancourt et al Zhong et al · Troya et al Involving patients with dementia in decisions to initiate treatment Dooley et al ... Elena Garralda Simon Gilbody

Troya et al Dooley et al Fancourt et al Zhong et al · Troya et al Involving patients with dementia in decisions to initiate treatment Dooley et al ... Elena Garralda Simon Gilbody

Office Hours: FOURTH SUNDAY OF EASTER May …€¦ · †Maria Kowalczyk (Kowalczyk Family) †Wiktoria Toczek (Kowalczyk Family) †Anna i Julian Szkoła †Zofia Kowalska †Józef

Office Hours: FOURTH SUNDAY OF EASTER May …€¦ · †Maria Kowalczyk (Kowalczyk Family) †Wiktoria Toczek (Kowalczyk Family) †Anna i Julian Szkoła †Zofia Kowalska †Józef

Quaternary evolution of the Caravelas strandplain – …Dominguez et al. 1998). (Suguio et al. 1985, Martin et al. 1987, 1988, Suguio et al. 1988, Martin et al. 2002). Martin et al.

Quaternary evolution of the Caravelas strandplain – …Dominguez et al. 1998). (Suguio et al. 1985, Martin et al. 1987, 1988, Suguio et al. 1988, Martin et al. 2002). Martin et al.

Sensitivity of a leaf gas-exchange model for estimating ... · 796 D. L. Royer et al.: Sensitivity of a leaf gas-exchange model Kowalczyk et al., 2018) AnDA0 h ci ca ca 0 ih ci0 ca0

Sensitivity of a leaf gas-exchange model for estimating ... · 796 D. L. Royer et al.: Sensitivity of a leaf gas-exchange model Kowalczyk et al., 2018) AnDA0 h ci ca ca 0 ih ci0 ca0

Stewart Kowalczyk

Stewart Kowalczyk

Évaluationde l’absentéisme* scolairechez l’enfant*aeint de ......Grieve et al. J. Sch. Health, 2011. Borawska-Kowalczyk et al., Developmental Period Medicine, 2015. Matérielset!

Évaluationde l’absentéisme* scolairechez l’enfant*aeint de ......Grieve et al. J. Sch. Health, 2011. Borawska-Kowalczyk et al., Developmental Period Medicine, 2015. Matérielset!

et al. et al

et al. et al