NRP 3rd Annual Dahlman Rose & Co. Global Metals, Mining & Materials Conference
Knowledge Strategies for Development: Challenges for Korea Carl Dahlman World Bank KEDI WB Workshop...
-
Upload
denis-wilcox -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Knowledge Strategies for Development: Challenges for Korea Carl Dahlman World Bank KEDI WB Workshop...
Knowledge Strategies for Development:
Challenges for Korea
Carl DahlmanWorld Bank
KEDI WB WorkshopBalanced Regional Development and the Role of Higher Education
PohangFebruary 23, 2004
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
Structure of Presentation
1. Economic Growth in Historical Perspective2: The Knowledge Revolution3. A Knowledge Economy Framework4: Benchmarking Korea in the Global
Knowledge Economy5: Challenges for Korea in New Context6: Critical Issues for Korea’s Competitiveness7: The Role of Regional Innovation Systems
and Clusters8: Some Tough Issues for Discussion
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
World GDP/capita and Population A Two Millennium Perspective
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0
120
200
280
360
440
520
600
680
760
840
920
1000
1080
1160
1240
1320
1400
1480
1560
1640
1720
1800
1870
1950
1998
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
World GDP per capita (1990 international $) World Population (Million)
Source: Angus Maddison, The World Economy : A Millennial Perspective, OECD: Paris, 2001
GDP per capita
World Population (mill)
1: World GDP/Capita and Population
Growing Differences in GDP/Capita
Per Capita GDP for Selected Regions or Countries (1990 international $, 1480-1998)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
1480 1560 1640 1720 1800 1870 1950 1998
Western Europe
Eastern Europe
United States
Latin America
Japan
China
India
Other Asia
Africa
Source: Angus Maddison, The World Economy : A M illennial Perspective, OECD: Paris, 2001
Shares of World GDP - Constant US$ (1960 - 2002)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
%
East Asia & Pacific
High income: OECD ex. US & Japan
Japan
United States
Sub-Saharan Africa
Middle East & North Africa(Light Blue)
Latin American & Caribbean
Europe & Central Asia South Asia(Grey)
High Income: Non-OECD(Black)
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
Eight Fastest Growing Economies (constant 1995 US$)
Growth Depends on Successful Knowledge StrategiesAt lower level of development (and S&T capability) it depends largely on effectively tapping into global knowledge (playing rapid catch-up)At higher levels of development (and S&T capability) it also depends critically on own innovative effortKorea and Taiwan have already made the transition from being primarily catch-up economies to becoming innovating economies
GDP/Capita Growth: Korea vs Ghana
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
K n o w le d g e m a k e s th e D if fe r e n c e K n o w le d g e m a k e s th e D if fe r e n c e b e tw e e n P o v e r ty a n d W e a lth . . .b e tw e e n P o v e r ty a n d W e a lth . . .
R e p . o f K o r e a
G h a n a
T h o u s a n d s o f c o n s ta n t 1 9 9 5 U S d o lla r s
D if fe re n c e a t t r ib u te d to k n o w le d g e
D if fe re n c e d u e to p h y s ic a l a n d h u m a n c a p ita l
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
2.The Knowledge Revolution Ability to create, access and use knowledge is becoming fundamental determinant of global competitiveness
Seven key elements of “Knowledge Revolution”
Increased codification of knowledge and development of new technologies
Closer links with science base/increased rate of innovation/shorter product life cycles
Increased importance of education & up-skilling of labor force, and life-long learning
Investment in Intangibles (R&D,education, software) greater than Investments in Fixed Capital in OECD
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
The Knowledge Revolution – cont.Greater value added now comes from investment in intangibles such as branding, marketing, distribution, information management
Innovation and productivity increase more important in competitiveness & GDP growth
Increased Globalization and Competition
• Trade/GDP from 38% in 1990 to 52% in 1999
• Value added by TNCs 27% of global GDP
Bottom Line: Constant Change and Competition Implies Need for Constant Restructuring and Upgrading
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
Implications for Developing Countries
Developing Countries run of risk of being left behind as a result of increasing importance of knowledge and of a widening knowledge divide with advanced countries.
They need to develop coherent strategies to deal successfully with the constant restructuring resulting from the knowledge revolution.
They will need to make more effective use of knowledge for their development--to become knowledge economies.
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
3: The Knowledge Economy
There are many definitions of the “Knowledge Economy”, many emphasizing just information technology and high technology
We take a broader definition: “An economy that makes effective use of
knowledge for its economic and social development. This includes tapping foreign knowledge as well as adapting and creating knowledge for its specific needs.”
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
Framework for Using K4DFour Key Functional Areas
Economic incentive and institutional regime that provides incentives for the efficient use of existing and new knowledge and the flourishing of entrepreneurshipEducated, creative and skilled peopleDynamic information infrastructure Effective national innovation system
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
KAM Methodology 2004
KAM: 76 structural/qualitative variables to benchmark performance on 4 pillars
Variables normalized from 0 (worst) to 10 (best) for 121 countries
www.worldbank.org/kam Multiple modes offering wide range of
graphic representations and functionalities (1995 - Most Recent, comparison options)
Aggregate Knowledge Economy Index (KEI) – average of performance in 4 pillars – KI
Weighted and unweighted version – Innovation Variables
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
0
5
10GDP grow th (%)
Human Development Index
Tariff & nontariff barriers
Rule of Law
Regulatory Quality
Researchers in R&D / million
Patent applications granted by theUSPTO / million
Scientif ic and technical journal articles /million
Adult literacy rate (% age 15 and above)
Secondary Enrollment
Tertiary Enrollment
Telephones per 1,000 (mainlines +mobile)
Computers per 1,000 persons
Internet users per 10,000 people
1995 Most Recent Data
Korea
Basic Scorecard for Korea: 1995-2002
4: Knowledge Economy Index
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
5: Challenges for Korea
Korea is caught between higher technological capability of Japan (and advanced countries) and lower wage costs of China (and other developing countries)Needs to continuously move up the value chain and create profitable activities aimed at international markets, and not just in manufacturing
15 Largest Economies: GDP 2002 (Trillions of international $)
United States$10.14t
China$5.73t
South Korea$0.78t
India $2.69t
Indonesia$0.66t
Mexico $0.88t
Brazil $1.31t
Spain $0.85t
United Kingdom$1.51t
Italy $1.48t
France$1.55t
Germany $2.17t
Canada$0.90t
Japan 3.26
-3
-1
1
3
5
7
9
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000
GDP per capita (international $) 2002
Ave RGDP per capita growth 1990-2002 (%)
Russia $1.41t
Special Characteristics of KoreaHigh investments in R&D as share of GDP—almost 3.0%High investments in Education as share of GDP--11-12%, counting cost of tutoringBut not clear it is getting corresponding return from such high investmentsVery centralized development
Seoul: 47% population, 53% economic power, 73% corporate R&D centers, 77% venture business, 80% top 10 universities, 80% of public R&DIndustrial production very heavily dominated by large chaebol companies
6: Critical Issues for Korea
How to get bigger economic return from large investments in R&D and education?How to participate effectively in the global and regional economy?What is the role of regional innovation systems?
Challenges in R&D and InnovationKorea does invest a lot in R&D and has technological leadership in some areas but it is still relative small in global scaleKorea needs to improve the productivity of its R&D investmentsKorea needs to improve climate for innovation
Universities do very little R&DMost R&D and patenting is being done be few large chaebolNeed to create a more favorable climate for innovation
Average Total R&D Expenditure: Top 20 Economies1997 - 2000 (Bil of International $)
Brazil $9.8b
China $34.4b
Italy $13.7b
Spain $6.5b
Austria$3.7b
Belguim$4.6b
Netherlands$7.7b
Israel $3.6b
United Kingdom $23.9b
South Korea$16.2b
France $29.6b
Germany $47.2b
United States$230.8b
Japan$90.5b
Finland$3.6b
Switzerland$5.3b
Sweden$7.2b
Russia$9.3b
Australia $6.7b
Canada $13.8b
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0Average R&D Expenditure (% of GDP)
Average Scientists & Engineers in R&D (per mil
persons)
World Shares of USPTO Patent Count (1980 - 2001) excluding US and Japan
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
%
Germany
Taiwan
Germany
France
United Kingdom
South Korea
SwedenNetherlands
Challenges for Education and TrainingStock challenge: rapid creation and diffusion of knowledge means even adults constantly have to learn, therefore need
Multiple mechanisms for continuous training beyond formal education systemTo exploit potential of information and communications technologies to expand training opportunitiesEffective system for skills assessment and certification
Flow challenge: education system must teach students how to learn through their lifetime regardless of when they leave it: implies need for
Better teaching and learning pedagogies for core skillsBroader interdisciplinary approachesFinancing mechanisms to expand access and improve quality
Need to address both stock and flow challenges through better approach to life-long learning
Reform and re-allignment of public and private rolesAs well as domestic and foreign
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
Improving the Performance of Education and Training
Improve productivity of educationIncrease efficiency through less regulation, more accountability, greater flexibility to respond to needs of productive sectorImprove incentive regime for teachers and faculty
Change the content of educationImprove critical thinking and problem solving skills, Improve communication skills and ability to work in groupsTeach learning to learn
Develop more effective system of lifelong learningMore flexibility in terms of multiple pathways to different competenciesDevelop better system of just in time training
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
Participating More Effectively in Global EconomyIncreasing strategic alliances
With foreign firmsWith foreign research institutesWith foreign universities
Moving up global value chainsBecoming more productively integrated into global value chains controled by companies from other countriesFurther developing own brands and distribution networksMoving beyond manufacturing to services
7: What is Role of Regional Innovation Systems?
Regional innovation systems and clustersFour key institutions in clustersThe critical role of the universityFostering clustersImplications for policy
Regional Innovation Systems and ClustersThere is some evidence that dynamic clusters contribute to a region and a county’s competitivenessClusters are defined as geografic concentrations of interconnected companies, specialized suppliers, service providers, firms in related industries, and associated institutions that compete but also cooperate (Porter 1998, On Competition)Key benefit of clusters seems to be the externalities that result from specialization, information, and knowledge exchange, which reduce transactions costs and permit greater innovation and productivity increase
Key Institutions in ClustersFour key institutions
UniversitiesResearch InstitutesFirmsLocal Government
But real key is the network of interactions among them that produce valueTherefore policy should focus not so much on the key institutions, but their interactionsHardest part is how to achieve such combinations effectively and with what instruments
Critical Role of the UniversityEducation and Training
Training scientist and engineers, as well as entrepreneurs, and professionalsShould not be limited to formal training, but to lifelong trainingTherefore must be very responsive to needs of firms in cluster
Science and ResearchIn Korea universities are not so strong in researchTherefore research effort has to be strengthenedBut it must be relevant to needs of surrounding business
But perhaps key role is actually in facilitating networks
Relationship with former students and class networksContract research to industry or research centersPublic forums for discussion
Fostering ClustersMany efforts focus on strengthening individual components of clusterBut most critical is the interaction among the elements of clusterTherefore efforts have to give greater attention to programs that foster that interactivity
Joint researchContract research from firms to universities and research institutesMobility of personnel among three agentsSkills development programs
Fostering InteractivityShould go beyond specific region to interaction with other clusters in country
Many strong clusters exits in KoreaThere are strong complementarities among manuy of them
But should also include fostering interaction with clusters in other countries because of increasing globalization of knowledge
Exchanges of experiences and personnelResearch and production linkages
8:Some Tough Issues for DiscussionHow many regional innovation systems to push for?
What is the role of targeting and special incentives?Is there a risk that pushing for too many may compromise excellence and national competitiveness?Is there a trade-off between equity and excellence?
What are best strategies for promoting regional innovation systems?
How proactive a role can national or even local government take vs supporting or facilitating roleWhat is role of private sector in general and chaebol in particular?
Annex
KAM Normalization Procedure•Absolute values•Allocation of rankings•Normalization (0-10)Formula:Normalized (u) = 10*(Nw/Nc)
•Normalized (u) – normalized score allocated •Nw – no of countries with worse ranking•Nc – total sample of countries (121)
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
Innovation – Size matters
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
Innovation : Size matters – unweighted version
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
©Knowledge for Development, WBI
Average GDP/Capita Growth Rates1965-2002