KK WRP Summary 031610

download KK WRP Summary 031610

of 40

Transcript of KK WRP Summary 031610

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    1/40

    Kinnickinnic River

    Watershed Action TeamMeeting

    Summary Presentation of theWatershed Restoration Plan

    March 16, 2010

    UWM Great Lakes WATER Institute

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    2/40

    Agenda

    1. Introductions2. Sweet Water Report Out

    3. Recap of Recent KK WAT

    Activities4. Summary Presentation of

    Watershed Restoration Plan

    (WRP)5. Next Steps

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    3/40

    Sweet Water Report Out

    Executive Director hired

    Facilitated/coordinated proposals to GLRI

    Continue on 501(c)3 statusConference planning

    WRP orientation

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    4/40

    Recap of Recent WAT Activities

    Review & Comment on Draft WRP

    WAT Work Plan

    Recruitment Considerations

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    5/40

    Primary Purpose of the WRP

    Identify specific actions to be

    implemented by 2015 to improve waterquality and habitat within theKinnickinnic River Watershed

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    6/40

    Background of the WRP

    Culmination of historical and recentactivity to protect and restore waterquality within the Greater Milwaukeeregion:

    Regional Water Quality Plan (December2007)

    MMSD 2020 Facilities Plan (December2007)

    Input from the Southeastern WisconsinWatersheds Trust, Inc. (Sweet Water),Watershed Action Team and ScienceCommittee (February 2008 present)

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    7/40

    General Structure of the WRP

    Follows the Clean Water Act guidelines for

    developing effective watershed plans

    Establishes initial goals and recommended

    actions based on the Regional Plan

    WRP is intended to be a flexible, adaptive

    document

    Starting point

    Plan-Do-Check-Act

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    8/40

    Focus Areas

    Public Health/Bacteria

    Habitat & Aesthetics

    Nutrients (Phosphorus)

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    9/40

    Public Health/Bacteria

    Source:MMSD

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    10/40

    Habitat

    Source:SEWRPC

    Source:MMSD

    Dissolved OxygenConcrete Lining

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    11/40

    Habitat Total Suspended Solids

    Plume of Suspended Solids

    Source:MMSD

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    12/40

    Source:MMSD

    Cladophora near Bradford Beach

    Nutrients - Phosphorus

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    13/40

    Baseline Year 2000 Conditions

    Data

    characterized

    for 10

    assessmentpoint areas

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    14/40

    Baseline Year 2000 Conditions (cont.)

    Fact Sheets for each Assessment Point

    Area

    Maps

    Applicable water quality standards

    Summary of water quality data with brief

    assessment

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    15/40

    Baseline Year 2000 Conditions (cont.)

    Kinnickinnic

    River

    Watershed

    AssessmentPoints &

    Areas

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    16/40

    KinnickinnicRiver

    WatershedAssessment

    Points &

    Reaches

    Source: SEWRPC

    KinnickinnicRiver

    WatershedAssessment

    Points &

    Areas

    KK-5 Holmes

    Avenue Creek

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    17/40

    KinnickinnicRiver

    WatershedHolmes

    Avenue CreekAssessment

    Point & Area

    Source: MMSD, Watershed Restoration Plan Fact Sheet for Assessment Point KK-5

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    18/40

    Baseline Year 2000 Conditions (cont.)

    Highly urbanized land uses

    Unknown sources of fecal coliform bacteria

    Predominant nutrient loading from land

    surface; however, need to consider

    phosphorus compounds added to drinking

    water

    Habitat (fish) conditions vary throughout thewatershed

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    19/40

    Management Strategies to Achieve

    Goals

    Existing regulatory management strategies

    E.g. NR 151 (DNR runoff management rules)

    Other management strategies in various

    stages of implementation

    Bacteria identification at stormwater outfalls

    Management strategies recommended for

    implementation by the Regional Plan, but notyet implemented

    Establish long-term aquatic habitat monitoring

    stations

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    20/40

    Expected Benefits

    WRP presents the individual pollutant

    reductions and other anticipated benefits

    for each of the specific management

    measures identified

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    21/40

    Expected Benefits (cont.)

    Fecal

    Coliform

    (May-Sep)

    TP TSS

    Baseline 86% 77% 100%

    Year 2020 85% 78% 100%

    ScorePercent Compliance

    Minimum MaximumVery Good 95 100

    Good 85 94

    Moderate 75 84

    Poor 0 74

    KK-5: Holmes Avenue Creek Water Quality

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    22/40

    Expected Benefits (cont.)

    Kinnickinnic Watershed Annual Pollutant Loads

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    23/40

    What are the Issues in the

    Kinnickinnic River Watershed?

    Rank Assessment PointNonpoint Load per

    Acre (billion counts)

    1 KK-5 337

    2 KK-2 299

    3 KK-6 2964 KK-1 290

    5 KK-3 280

    Fecal Coliform

    L i f P i i A

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    24/40

    Location of Priority AreasFecal Coliform

    Top 5 areas

    generating fecal

    coliform per acre of

    land Based on model

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    25/40

    What are the Issues in the

    Kinnickinnic River Watershed?

    Rank Assessment PointNonpoint Load per

    Acre (tons)

    1 KK-5 0.30

    2 KK-2 0.25

    3 KK-6 0.234 KK-10 0.21

    5 KK-8 0.20

    Total Suspended Solids

    L ti f P i it A

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    26/40

    Location of Priority AreasTotal Suspended Solids (TSS)

    Top 5 areas

    generating TSS per

    acre of land

    Based on model

    Wh t th I i th

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    27/40

    What are the Issues in the

    Kinnickinnic River Watershed?

    Rank Assessment PointNonpoint Load per

    Acre (lbs)

    1 KK-5 0.94

    2 KK-6 0.88

    3 KK-2 0.824 KK-8 0.79

    5 KK-10 0.78

    Total Phosphorus

    L ti f P i it A

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    28/40

    Location of Priority AreasPhosphorus

    Top 5 areas

    generating

    phosphorus per acre

    of land Based on model

    L ti f P i it A

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    29/40

    Location of Priority AreasCombined Results

    Indicates areas that

    WATs may want to

    focus on first

    Hot spots

    L ti f P i it A

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    30/40

    Location of Priority AreasRiparian Corridor

    Riparian corridor

    widths

    Source: SEWRPC

    L ti f P i it A

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    31/40

    Location of Priority AreasConcrete-lined Channels

    Concrete-lined

    channels locations

    Source: SEWRPC

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    32/40

    Future Actions

    Priority Actions

    Based on the Regional Plan, modified by

    Sweet Water

    Targeted toward the three focus areas

    Foundation Actions

    Subset of Priority Actions

    Predecessor actions to be completed first inorder to realize the full benefit of the other

    actions identified

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    33/40

    Prioritization of Actions (cont.)

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    34/40

    Foundation Actions

    Public Health

    Identify unknown sources of bacteria,

    including illicit connections

    Increase recreational use

    Reduce bacteria sources from land-based

    sources

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    35/40

    Foundation Actions (cont.)

    Habitat and Aesthetics

    Moderate flow regimes to decrease flashiness

    Reduce nonpoint water quality impacts (focus

    on chlorides)

    Reduce impacts through green infrastructure

    Restore fish passage throughout the

    watershed

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    36/40

    Foundation Actions (cont.)

    Nutrients (Phosphorus)

    Reduce use of phosphorus compounds in

    drinking water

    Reduce phosphorus loads from regulateddischarges

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    37/40

    Additional WRP Recommendations

    Policy issues identified

    Total Maximum Daily Load Development

    (TMDL)

    Watershed permits

    Water quality trading

    NR 151 implementation

    Alternatives to adding phosphoruscompounds to drinking water

    Alternative indicator to fecal coliform bacteria

    303(d) list listing/delisting criteria

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    38/40

    Action Plan Prioritization

    Review WRP Rec / Science

    Prioritize (as a team)

    Policy Consideration

    Pollutant Trading

    Phosphorus Ban

    Pre/Post Monitoring

    Fill Data Gaps

    Funding is Key

    Why we need

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    39/40

    Why we need

    YOU as a Partner!

    Diversity of opportunities for involvement

    Community connections

    Identify & coordinate with other efforts

    Leverage resources through partnerships

    Diverse interests & skill sets needed

    Access to resources

  • 7/31/2019 KK WRP Summary 031610

    40/40

    Next Steps

    Final WRPs Posted March 31st

    www.swwtwater.org/home/documents.cfm

    Next Meeting: April 21st (4:00 pm)

    Review of Current Initiatives Tied to WRP

    Recommendations

    Discuss Prioritization of Activities

    Subsequent Meetings: TBD (monthly)

    Continue Prioritization & Implementation

    Planning

    http://www.swwtwater.org/home/documents.cfmhttp://www.swwtwater.org/home/documents.cfm