Kiribati Trade Policy Framework 2017-2027...• Implement consumer protection and awareness...
Transcript of Kiribati Trade Policy Framework 2017-2027...• Implement consumer protection and awareness...
Kiribati Trade Policy Framework 2017-2027
iiiTPF 2017-2027
Acronyms viForeword viiiExecutive Summary ix1. Introduction 11.1 Vision 1
1.2 Mission Statement 1
1.3 Objectives 1
1.4 Guiding Principles 1
1.5 Scope of Trade Policy 2
2. Country and Economic Context 42.1 Country Background 4
2.2 Historical and Recent Economic
Performance 5
2.2.1 Structure of the Economy 6
2.3 Employment 6
2.4 Analysis of the Balance of Payments
and Trade 8
2.4.1 Goods Imports 8
2.4.2 Goods Exports 9
2.5 Macroeconomic Policy 10
Policy Measures 11
3. Trade and Sustainable Development 133.1 Trade and Health:
Ensuring a Healthier Kiribati 14
Policy Measures 14
3.2 Inclusive Trade: Spreading the
BenefitsofTradetoAlli-Kiribati 15
Policy Measures 16
3.3 Trade and Environmental Sustainability 17
Policy Measures 17
4. Trade Policy Instruments 194.1 Restrictions on Imports 19
4.2 Import Duties and Duty Exemptions 19
4.3 Fees and Permits for Import and Export 19
Policy Measures 20
4.4 Restrictions and Taxes on Exports 20
4.5 Other Trade Policy Instruments:
Anti-dumping,Countervailing
Measures and Safeguards 20
4.6 KeyTrade-RelatedLegislation 20
5. Securing Kiribati’s Place in the Global Economy 23
5.1 Overall Objectives for Kiribati’s Trade
Engagement with the World 24
5.1.1 Expanding Market Access for
Kiribati-madeGoods 24
5.1.2 ExpandingMarketAccessfori-Kiribati
Workers 24
5.1.3 LookingBeyondFTAstoOther
Commercial Arrangements 24
5.2 Preferential Free Trade Arrangements and
Negotiations Currently Involving Kiribati 25
5.2.1 Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) 26
5.2.2 World Trade Organization (WTO) and
Basic International Trade Rules 26
5.2.3 Trade with the European Union 26
5.2.4 Trade with Australia and New Zealand 27
5.2.5 TradeWithinthePacificIslads 27
Policy Measures 29
6. Breaking Down Barriers to Private Sector Development in Kiribati 316.1 Overview of the Current State of
the Private Sector in Kiribati 31
Policy Measures 32
6.2 Creating the Space for the Private
Sector through Reforming State
Owned Enterprises 32
Policy Measures 32
6.3 CompanyLawandBusiness
Registration Reform 33
Policy Measures 33
6.4 Cooperative Development 33
Policy Measures 34
6.5 Investmentbyi-KiribatiatHome 34
Policy Measures 35
6.6 Encouraging Inward Investment to Kiribati
–ASimpler,QuickerSystem 35
Policy Measures 36
6.7 At the Border – Facilitating Trade 36
Policy Measures 37
6.8 International and Domestic Shipping –
Consistent,ReliableandCost-effective
Shipping 37
6.8.1 International Shipping 38
6.8.2 Domestic Shipping 38
Policy Measures 38
6.9 AirServices–ImprovingtheFrequency,
ReliabilityandAffordabilityofInternational
and Domestic Freight and Travel 39
Policy Measures 40
6.10 ICTE-CommerceandTrade 40
Policy Measures 40
Contents
iv vTPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
6.11 Competition and Consumer Protection 40
Policy Measures 41
6.12 StandardsandQualityInfrastructure
System 41
Policy Measures 41
6.13 Intellectual Property 42
Policy Measures 42
6.14 Land 42
Policy Measures 43
7. Linkages to Key Productive Sector Policies and Supply Capacity 457.1 Agriculture 45
Policy Measures 46
7.2 Fisheries 46
Policy Measures 49
7.3 Tourism 49
Policy Measures 51
7.4 LabourMobility 51
Policy Measures 53
7.5 Deep Seabed Mineral Resources 53
Policy Measures 54
7.6 Strengthening Domestic Supply Chains 54
Policy Measures 55
8 Implementation, Institutions and Aid for Trade 578.1 Timeframe for Implementation 57
8.2 Implementation of the Trade Policy
FrameworkattheBroadLevel 57
8.3 TPF Implementation Matrix 58
8.4 Institutional Framework for Coordinating
and Monitoring Implementation 58
8.5 Resourcing TPF Implementation
through Aid for Trade 59
Policy Measures 61
Annex 1: Trade Policy Framework
Implementation Plan 63
List of Figures
Figure 1.1: Map of the Trade Policy Framework and Relationship to the KDP 2
Figure 2.1: Map of Kiribati 4
Figure2.2:Longtermeconomicgrowthperformanceof selected PICs (in constant 2010 USD) 5
Figure 2.2.1: Composition of GDP by Industry 2014 6
Figure 2.3: Public and Private Sector KPF Contributors,Kiribati,2009-2016 7
Figure2.4:ImportsandExports,1974to2016 8
Figure2.4.1:ShareofImportedGoods,2006-10 8
Figure2.4.2:Avg.WeightedTariffRatesinFICs,2015 9
Figure2.4.3:Exports1996-2016 10
Figure2.5:Revenue,Expenditure,DeficitsandSurpluses,Kiribati,2007-2016 11
Figure3.1:OverallFrameworkforHowTrade,definedbroadlyas‘Exchanges’or‘Transactions’betweenindividuals,contributestoDevelopment 13
Figure3.2.1:Female(15+)LabourForceParticipation Rate in Sepected PICs 15
Figure3.2.2:Unemployment:work-seekersas percentage of labour force 15
Figure 3.2.3: Total Employment by Sector andGender,selectedsectors(with gender ratio by sector in percent) 15
Figure 3.2.4: Employment Type: South Tarawa and Other Areas 16
Figure 5.1: Kiribati’s Broad Objectives from Trade-relatedPartnershipsandAgreements 23
Figure 6.1: Number of Registered Businesses per Island 31
Figure6.1.1:FormalSectorEmployment,2009-2016 32
Figure6.5:Investment-GrowthCycle 34
Figure 6.6: FDI Applications 35
Figure 7.1: Trends in Exports of CoconutProducts,AUD‘000’(2004-2014) 45
Figure 7.2: Kiribati’s Exclusive Economic Zone 47
Figure 7.3: Visitor Arrivals to Kiribati by Purpose,2000-15 50
Figure7.4:Seamen’sRemittances,2000to2016 52
Figure 8.1: Institutional Structure for Implementation of the TPF 59List of Tables
Table 2.1: 2015 Census Data on Employment in Kiribati 7
Table4.1:KeyTrade-relatedLegislation 20
Table 5.1: Summary of Kiribati’s Market Access Arrangements with the World 25
Table 5.2: Policy Measures on Trade Negotiations and Agreements 29
Table 8.1: AfTActivitybyDonor(2011-15,total) 60
vi viiTPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
AcronymsACPS African,CaribbeanandPacific
States
ADB Asian Development Bank
AfT Aid for Trade
AKL AirKiribatiLimited
ALD AgricultureandLivestockDivision
APTC Australia–PacificTechnicalCollege
ATHKL Amalgamated Telecom Holdings KiribatiLimited
AUD Australian Dollar
BPC Business Promotion Centre
BRC Business Regulatory Centre
CCFZ Clarion Clipperton Fracture Zone
CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species
CLPB CentralLandPlanningBoard
CPSC CentralPacificShippingCommission
CSDS Coconut Sector Development Strategy
CSOs Civil Society Organisations
DBK Development Bank of Kiribati
DFQF DutyFreeandQuotaFree
DSM Deep Sea Mining
DTIS Diagnostic Trade Integration Study
DWFNs Distant Water Fishing Nations
EBA Everything But Arms
EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EIF Enhanced Integrated Framework
EPA Economic Partnership Agreement
ERP Economic Reform Programme
EU European Union
FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation
FIC Foreign Investment Commission
FICs Forum Island Countries
FDI Foreign Direct Investment
FFA Forum Fisheries Agency
FSM Federated States of Micronesia
FTA Free Trade Agreement
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GEF Global Environment Facility
GLUP GeneralLandUsePlan
GNI Gross National Income
GoK Government of Kiribati
GSP Generalised System of Preferences
HACCP Hazard Action Critical Control Point
HDI Human Development Inde
HS Harmonised System
H&S Hub and Spokes Programme
ICT Information and Communication Technology
IMF International Monetary Fund
IP Intellectual Property
ISO International Standards Organisation
IUU Illegal,UnreportedandUnregulated
KCCI Kiribati Chamber of Commerce and Industry
KCMCL KiribatiCopraMillLimited
KCS Kiribati Customs Service
KDP Kiribati Development Plan
KIEP Kiribati Integrated Environment Policy
KIT Kiribati Institute of Technology
KFL KiribatiFishLimited
KNSL KiribatiNationalShippingLine
KNTO KiribatiNationalTourismOffice
KPA Kiribati Ports Authority
KPF Kiribati Provident Fund
KSSL KiribatiShippingServicesLimited
LDC LeastDevelopedCountry
LPIDS LineandPhoenixIslandsDevelopment Strategy
MCIC MinistryofCommerce,Industryand Cooperatives
MICTTD MinistryofInformation,Communication,
Transport and Tourism Development
MEA Multilateral Environmental Agreement
MELAD MinistryofEnvironment,LandsandAgricultural Development
MFED Ministry of Finance and Economic Development
MFMRD Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources Development
MFN Most Favoured Nation
MHMS Ministry of Health and Medical Services
MIA MinistryofInternalAffairs
MEHR Ministry of Employment and Human Resource.
MLPID MinistryofLineandPhoenixIslands Development
MYWSSA MinistryofYouth,Women,SportsandSocialAffairs
MSC Marine Stewardship Council
MSG Melanesian Spearhead Group
MTC Marine Training Centre
MTEC Micronesian Trade and Economic Community
NCDs Non-CommunicableDiseases
NFP National Fisheries Policy
NIPS National Intellectual Property Strategy
NLMP NationalLabourMobilityPolicy
NMTP National Maritime Transport Policy
NQP NationalQualityPolicy
NSO NationalStatisticsOffice
NSC National Shipping Council
NTB Non-TariffBarriers
NTAC National Trade Advisory Committee
NZ New Zealand
OCO Oceania Customs Organisation
ODA OfficialDevelopmentAssistance
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operationandDevelopment
PAC PacificAccessCategory
PACER-Plus PacificAgreementonCloserEconomic Relations Plus
PACPS PacificAfrican,CaribbeanandPacificState
PCA Post Clearance Audit
PICs PacificIslandCountries
PICTA PacificIslandCountriesTradeAgreement
PIFS PacificIslandsForumSecretariat
PIPSO PacificIslandsPrivateSectorOrganisation
PNA Parties to the Nauru Agreement
PPP Public Private Partnership
PSDI Private Sector Development Initiative
PSDS Private Sector Development Strategy
PT&I PacificTradeandInvest
QIS QualityInfrastructureSystem
RERF Revenue Equalisation Reserve Fund
RoO Rules of Origin
RMI Republic of the Marshall Islands
RTA Regional Trade Agreement
RSE Recognised Seasonal Employer
SBM Seabed Minerals
SDGs Sustainable Development Goals
SIDS Small Island Developing State
SIS Small Island State
SMEs Small and Medium Sized Enterprises
SOEs State Owned Enterprises
SOEMAU State Owned Enterprise Monitoring and Advisory Unit
SPC SecretariatofthePacificCommunity
SPMS SouthPacificMarineServices
SPS SanitaryandPhyto-sanitaryMeasures
SPARTECA SouthPacificRegionalTradeandEconomic Cooperation Agreement
SWF Sovereign Wealth Fund
SWP Seasonal Worker Programme
TBT Technical Barriers to Trade
TFA Trade Facilitation Agreement
TK Traditional Knowledge
TPF Trade Policy Framework
TTM Taiwan Technical Mission
TVET Technical and Vocational Education and Training
UN United Nations
UNCLOS United Nations Convention on the LawoftheSea
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
USD United States Dollar
USP UniversityoftheSouthPacific
VAT Value Added Tax
VDS Vessel Day Scheme
WCO World Customs Organisation
WHO World Health Organisation
WIPO World Intellectual Property Organization
WTO World Trade Organization
viii ixTPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
ForewordIamdelightedtopresentthefirstTradePolicyFramework(TPF)forKiribati.TheTPFprovidesaclearcodificationofthe Government’s strategy towards using trade as a tool for creating wealth and prosperity for our people.
TheTPFisinlinewiththedevelopmentaspirationsinTeMotinnano,KV20andtheKiribatiDevelopmentPlan(2016-2019)whichseektopromoteeconomicgrowth,inclusivesustainabledevelopmentandpovertyreductionthroughthedevelopmentoftheprivatesector.Thepolicyisanexampleofaplanned,predictableandevidence-basedpolicyinformedby various consultations undertaken by theMinistry of Commerce, Industry andCooperatives (MCIC)withtechnicalandfinancialassistancefromtheEnhancedIntegratedFramework(EIF)throughtheUnitedNationsDevelopment Programme (UNDP).
The TPF has benefited from a series of consultations conducted fromNovember 2016with the private sector,GovernmentMinistries, Agencies andCivil Society. The consultations included a successful validationworkshophostedinJune2017,followedbyconsultationswiththeNationalTradeAdvisoryCommittee(NTAC)wherethefinaldraft of the TPF was discussed.
TheTPFservesseveral importantpurposes.Firstly,thedocumentpullstogetherrecentpoliciesandstrategiestocreate a primary umbrella policy for the Government with regards to key policy measures that would foster and stimulate the development of trade.
Thisdocumentdoesnotobviatetherelevantrolesofthealreadyexistingpolicies,suchastheNationalIntellectualPropertyStrategy (NIPS), theNationalFisheriesPolicy (NFP), theNationalTransportandMaritimePolicy (NTMP),National Quality Policy (NQP) and National Labour Migration Policy (NLMP). Instead, the TPF selectively pullsthesedocumentstogetherintooneoverarchingframework,allowingimplementationtobeeasilyconductedandmonitored.Secondly,thedocumentfillsavitalgapinoutliningKiribati’sstrategywithregardstoimportanttradepolicy issues which are currently not adequately covered in the existing Government Policy.
The TPF will serve as a living document and will be amended as policy conditions change. The Government will make annualassessmentsontheprogressoftheTPFand,fromtimetotime,willmakeamendmentstoensurethatthecountry’s trade policy continues to deliver the best development choices for the citizens of Kiribati.
Throughthe implementationof thisTradePolicy,weseek to foster theright tradeand investmentenvironmentfor thedevelopmentof theeconomyand importantly, thegrowthandpromotionof thekeyproductivesectorssuchasFisheries,CoconutsandTourism.TheGovernmentintendstodevelopthesesectorsthroughtargetedandinnovativepolicieswhichaddresskeyconstraintstogrowth.Inthisway,wecanfosteranewanddynamicprivatesector that creates wealth and prosperity for all citizens of Kiribati.
Iwouldliketoendbythankingallthepartners,Governmentministries,theprivatesectorandcivilsocietymemberswho have contributed constructively in the development process and helped to bring this document to completion.
IwouldliketogiveparticularthankstotheEIFSecretariatandUNDPforfinancialsupporttoallowtheInternationalConsultant,Mr.DannyLuitoundertaketheTPFassignment.Iwouldalsoliketoacknowledgethetechnicalsupportof theCommonwealthSecretariat throughtheNationalTradeAdvisor,Mr.SamsonOdhiamboAwino,undertheHubandSpokesprogramme,towardstheformulationofthisTPF,aswellasMCICstaff,inparticulartheDirectorforBusinessPromotionCentre(DBPC)andstaffoftheTradePromotionDivisionatBPC.Withoutsuchcontinuoussupport,thisdocumentcouldnothavebecomeafinishedproduct.
Te Mauri (Health) Te Raoi (Peace) ao Te Tabomoa (Prosperity).
_______________________________________
Hon. Atarake NataaraMinisterofCommerce,IndustryandCooperatives
Executive SummaryTheTPFisthefirstintegratedtradepolicydocumentontraderelatedmattersinKiribati.Thepolicyfillsanimportantgapinthecountry’soverallpolicyframeworkforeconomictransformation,whichhassofarreliedonahorizontaltreatmentoftradeissuescoupledwithsomeselectedtrade-specificmeasures.Itsetsouttheimportanceoftradefor Kiribati as well as the overall mechanisms through which Kiribati can use trade as a tool for inclusive and sustainable development in line with national development strategies.
The TPF in the Overall Development strategy: The TPF is one of the national economic strategies and policies that seeks to create wealth and prosperity. The role of the TPF is to ensure that various trade related policies – including but not limited toNational Quality Policy, National Fisheries Policy, National LabourMigration Policy,Seabed Minerals Policy etc. – are not contradicting each other in regards to the national trade development agenda. Inaddition,thePolicyalsoaddressescertaintradepolicyissueswhicharenotpartoftheotherspecificpoliciesorstrategies such as the participation of Kiribati in the global economy through regional trade agreements like PACER Plus,PICTA,SPARTECA,andEPA.
The TPF promotes a balanced relationship between integration in the global economy and sustainable development. ItalsopromotesamoretransparentandpredictablebusinessenvironmentandseekstointegrateSMEs,women,youth and the disabled – especially those living on the outer Islands – into the national development agenda.
Insummary,theTPFseeksto:a) SetandredefineGovernmentPolicyrelatingtointernationalanddomestictrade;b) Design appropriate complementary measures to improve the business regulatory and macroeconomic
environment;c) Increaseinvestmentininfrastructuretosupporttradedevelopment;d) Improvecoordinationofinstitutionsresponsibleforpromotingandregulatingtrade;e) ImprovetheinstitutionalarrangementsforimplementingthetradepolicyagendainKiribati;
Constraints to be addressed in the TPF: In order to achieve the objective of TPF and reap the development benefitsofgrowth in theprivate sectorand improved tradeperformance,Kiribatiwillhave toaddressmultipledomesticconstraints forfirmsto invest,developnew industries,produceandcontribute to thedevelopmentoftrade.WhileGovernmenthasbeen implementing variousmeasures to support thedevelopmentof inter-islandtrade,domestictradeforlocalproductsisstillconstrainedbylimitedsupplycapacityandproducermarketlinkages,poormarketinginfrastructureandpoorinter-Islandconnectivity.
Other constraints to tradeandprivatedevelopment include theexistenceofoutdatedbusiness laws,whichareincompatible with the current private sector and trade development regime, thus negatively impacting on theinflowofForeignDirectInvestment(FDI).Assuch,veryfewbusinessesparticipateinproductivesectorslikefisheriesand tourism on the outer Islands. Low participation in the productive sector implies limited supply capacity.Other sectors like Seabed Mining still remain unexploited. Exports are mainly concentrated on only a few primary productsandfewdestinationmarkets.Kiribatistill facesmarketaccesschallenges linkedtoProductQualityandTechnicalStandardsforgoodsandservices.ThecostofdoingbusinessinKiribati isrelativelyhigh,comparedtosimilareconomiesinthePacific.
Addressing the Constraints: The constraints will be addressed through various strategic policy measures. In order to establishaframeworkforimplementation,monitoringandevaluationoftheTPFundereachofthePolicyareas,thePolicysetsoutarationale,underlyingmeasureswithineachofthedesignatedPolicyareas,performanceindicatorsand targets.ThePolicyattachesgreat importance to thepromotionof social inclusion,genderequalityand theavoidance of negative impacts on environment.
ImplementationPrinciples:Inordertoensurethatthetradepolicyiscoherentandconsistentwithotherpolicies,the responsibility of TPF implementation will rest with the Government line Ministry which has the mandate for each specificpolicy,andmonitoringofprogressandconsistencyfortheTPFwillbethepurviewoftheNationalTradeAdvisoryCommittee(NTAC)incollaborationwiththeMinistryofCommerce,IndustryandCooperatives.Inthisway,the TPF avoids duplication of work while ensuring coherence of the policy framework. The underlying principle is to mainstream trade policy objectives across Kiribati’s Policies.
x 1TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
1.1: Vision
The20-yeardevelopmentblueprint(KV20)seekstofosterinclusivetradeandprivatesectordevelopmentthroughfisheries and tourism as the key productive sectors among other existing sectors. The KV20 aims to increaseexports, the volumeof domestic trade and inflowof ForeignDirect Investment (FDI). TheKV20 aims to ensuremacroeconomic sustainability by developing sustainable tourism, inclusive sustainable trade and private sectordevelopment,promotingsustainablefisheriesandmarinedevelopment,aswellas investing inhumancapitaltoenhance productivity and employment.
KiribatiDevelopmentPlan (KDP) 2016-2019also seeks topromotebetter education, betterhealth and inclusivesustainable economic growth and development. The KDP seeks to foster equitable development in the context of geographyandatthesametimeaddresstheplightofmarginalisedgroupsincludingwomen,youthanddisabledpeople.
BearinginmindthevisionofKV20andthemissionofKDP,theTPFsetsoutthevisionoftheGovernmentofKiribation how trade can be used as a fundamental tool for achieving the KV20 and the KDP. The vision of the Trade Policy is:
1.2: Mission Statement
The overall mission of the Policy is to facilitate the transformation of Kiribati into a competitive economy and strengthen its participation in both domestic and international trade with the ultimate objective of creating wealth and prosperity.
1.3: Objectives
The TPF mission will be achieved through the following objectives:• SettingandredefiningGovernmentpolicyrelatingtointernationalanddomestictrade;• Designing appropriate complementary measures to improve the business regulatory and macroeconomic
environment;• Increasinginvestmentininfrastructuretosupporttradedevelopment;• Improvingcoordinationofinstitutionsresponsibleforpromotingandregulatingtrade;• ImprovingtheinstitutionalarrangementsforimplementingthetradepolicyagendainKiribati;and• Mainstreaming trade into national development strategies and sector policies.
1.4: Guiding Principles
The TPF is premised on the following guiding principles:• Strengtheningthecapacitytotradeinlocalproduceandfosterinternationaltrade;• Mainstreamingtradeintonationaldevelopmentstrategiesandsectorpolicies;• Coordinatingtheapproachtotheformulationandimplementationoftradepolicies;• Conformingwiththecountry’sobligationsinregionalandbilateraltradeagreements;• Creatingopportunitiesforall,includingwomen,youth,disabledpeopleandthoseontheouterislands;• Creating an enabling environment to support the development of the private sector through increased
domesticandForeignInvestment;and• Creating value chain linkages to support the development of national and international trade in goods and
services.
1. Introduction
A dynamic and competitive economy for equitable distribution of wealth and prosperity
2 3TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
1.5: Scope of Trade Policy
TheTPFisbroad-rangingandthematicinitsscope,giventhattradeisacomplexcross-cuttingactivity.TheTPFfirstlyexaminesthetradeandeconomicsituation(Section2)andthenexaminessomekeytradedimensions,includingtherelationshipbetweentradeandsustainabledevelopment,health,inclusivegrowthandenvironmentalsustainability(Section 3). It further analyses the key trade policy instruments (Section 4). Section 5 of the TPF deals with Kiribati’s tradingpartnershipswiththerestoftheworld,includingcurrentnegotiationsandothercommercialarrangements.Section6oftheTPFlooksatanumberofkeyenablersoftradeincludingtradefacilitationandborderprocesses,international anddomestic transport, local and foreign investment aswell as quality standards and intellectualproperty regimes such as trademarks. Section 7 details the linkages between trade policies in key economic sectors includingfisheries,agriculture,tourism, labourmobilityandtheblueorocean-basedeconomy.Finally,Section8looks at the implementation and institutional framework for ensuring that the TPF delivers on its goals.
Figure 1.1 Map of the Trade Policy Framework and Relationship to the KDP
Kiribati Development Plan
Health GovernanceHuman
ResourcesDev’t
Economic Growth & Poverty
Reduction
Infrastructure Environment
Kiribati Twenty Year Vision (KV20)
Trade & Sustainable
Development
Trade Dimensions (TPF chapter 2,3)
Economic Sectors (TPF chapter 7)
Trade Enablers (TPF chapter 6)
Trade, Competitiveness& Private Sector
Development
Trade, Competitiveness& Private Sector
Development
Trade & Sustainable
Performance
Facilitating Trade at the
Border
Foreign Investment
Quality Standards
Intellectual Property
Other (Finance, etc.)
Transport Linkages
Domestic Investment
Trade, Health & Consumer Protection
Trade, Health & Consumer Protection
Labour Mobility
Other (Blue Economy, etc.)
Fisheries Tourism
Trade Policy Framework
(TPF)
4 5TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
2.1 Country Background
TheRepublicofKiribati,withapopulationof110,136(2015Census), isoneofthemost isolatedcountries intheworld.SituatedoneithersideoftheInternationalDateline,aswellasnorthandsouthoftheequator,itcomprisesof32coralatollsand1raisedatollspreadacross3.5millionsquarekilometresofocean,anareabiggerthantheCaribbeanSea.Morethan90percentofthepopulationisconcentratedintheGilbertIslands,withover50percentof those living in South Tarawa.
Figure 2.1: Map of Kiribati
Thetotal landarea isonly811squarekm.About1,480kmeastof theGilbert Islands liesthePhoenix Islands,agroup of eight largely uninhabited low-lying atolls and reef islands. Further east are the Line Islands includingKiritimati,whichisabout3,330kmfromTarawa.Kiritimatiistheworld’slargestatoll(388squarekm),accountingfor almost half of Kiribati’s land area but only about 5 per cent of the population.
Althoughthereisnoextremepoverty,Kiribatiisranked12thof14Pacificislandcountriesand137thintheworldaccording to the UNDP Human Development Index (HDI) ranking. Illnesses associated with malnutrition exist,particularly on the outer islands. While Kiribati is considered a low HIV prevalence country, it has one of thehighestHIVinfectionratespercapitainthePacificwithatotalof60HIVinfectionsfortheperiodof1991to2015.Schoolenrolment iscloseto100percent,butreportingofattendance isunreliableandtheFiguremasksothershortcomings in the education system such as survival and retention rate at primary level. Kiribati has ranked highly ontheUNEconomicVulnerabilityIndexsince1991,withascoregreaterthan70percentformostoftheseyears.
2. Country and Economic ContextKiribatifacessignificantchallengesinparticipatingininternationalvaluechainsandtheglobaleconomy.Exportsofboth goods and services are limited. Kiribati’s international competitiveness is best understood in reference to its mainchallengestoparticipatingintheglobaleconomy,whicharewell-knownandinclude:
Kiribati nevertheless enjoys several advantages, including an unspoilt and attractive natural environment, withsignificant under-exploited potential in tourism. It also has relatively large foreign reserves in the RevenueEqualisationReserve Fund (RERF), initially establishedby theUK colonial administrationprior to independence.Additional advantages include a strong traditional culture among I-Kiribati, which promotes social stability andfamilywelfare,highliteracyrates,potentialinfisheriesandlow-skilledservicesexportsandthecountry’svastoceanspace containing untapped marine resources whose commercial value has yet to be determined.
2.2 Historical and Recent Economic Performance
While somenewopportunities have begun to emerge in areas such as fisheries and labourmobility, the basicstructure and characteristics of the Kiribati economy outlined above have remained largely unchanged since 1979. Overall, thebroadmacroeconomicenvironmentfortrade inKiribatioverthe last25yearshasbeenprogressivetowardsachievingdevelopmentgoals,thoughitsrelativelyvolatileeconomicgrowthhasbeenlowerthanitspeerson average.
Figure. 2.2 depicts that the real GDP per capita has risen by 50 per cent since 1990 in Samoa but has essentially stagnatedinKiribatiatlevelssimilartothoserecordedintheearlytomid-1990s.
Figure 2.2 Long term economic growth performance of selected PICS (in constant 2010 USD)
Limited land and water supply for
commercial use
Inadquate basic infrastructure
Insufficient skills
Lack of investment and a poor business
environment
Vulnerability to climate change
Isolation from major markets and poor
connections
Small population and
lack of scale
Geographical disbursement of
population
Source: World Development Indicators
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
1990
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
Samoa
Fiji
Tuvalu
PIC avg
Vanuatu
Kiribati
6 7TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Inthenearfuture,economicgrowthisexpectedtobearound3percentperannum,mainlyreflectingtheimpactofmajordonorprojects.GDPperpersonin2014wasAUD1,838,whichisoneofthelowestofallPacificIslandnations.Atthesametime,thisstillputsKiribatiamongthebetteroffcountrieswithintheUnitedNationsLeastDevelopedCountry(LDC)grouping,andtheUNexpectsthatKiribatiwillgraduatefromthisgrouptobecomeaMiddleIncomeCountry by 2024.
2.2.1. Structure of the Economy
Nationalaccountsstatisticsshowthatwhileagricultureandfishingaccountfor23percentofproductioninKiribati,andmanufacturing around 4 per cent, as inmany other countries the largest share of output is generated byservices, including real estate, construction, finance, transport, wholesale and retail trade, and communication(Figure 2.2.1).
Figure 2.2.1. Composition of GDP by Industry 2014
Source: Kiribati National Statistics Office
2.3 Employment
Table 2.1 shows that agriculture remains the largest employer in Kiribati, followed by public administration,wholesaleandretailtradeandfisheries.GenderandgeographicalaspectsofemploymentareanalysedfurtherinSection 3.
Table 2.1. 2015 Census Data on Employment in Kiribati
Source: 2015 Population Census Report. Kiribati National Statistics Office
Complementary data from the Kiribati Provident Fund (KPF) on contributors to the KPF system show that the numberofprivatesectorcontributorshasincreasedfrom2,130inJune2010to3,982inJune2016,whichdepictsariseof87percent.Thenumberofcontributorsfromthepublicsectorhoweverrosefrom6,789in2010to6,917in 2016 (Figure 2.3).
Figure 2.3: Public and Private Sector KPF Contributors, Kiribati, 2009-2016
Source: Kiribati Provident Fund
Total Men WomenAgriculture 4104 2984 1119
Public Administration 3521 2192 1329
Wholesale & Retail 3457 1749 1708
Fisheries 2708 2228 480
Education 1940 595 1345
Transport 1233 908 325
Health 977 289 688
Handicrafts 919 74 845
Construction 846 784 62
Hotels and Restaurants 659 263 396
Personal Services 646 245 399
Security Services 646 594 52
Finance & Real Estate 381 192 188
Agriculture & Fishing 23.0%
Mining&Quarrying0.3%
Manufacturing 3.9%
Electricity,Gas&Water0.3%
Construction 8.7%
Wholesale & retail trade 4.2%Hotel & Restaurants 0.5%
Transport & Storage 6.0%Communications 3.6%Financial intermediation 6.1%
Real Estate 12.5%
Business services 1.0%
Government 28.6%
Other social services 1.4%
8 9TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
2.4 Analysis of the Balance of Payments and Trade Kiribatiisatradingnation,receivingsignificantlevelsofincomefromavarietyofsourcesandpurchasingsignificantlevels of goods and services in return. A feature of Kiribati’s overseas trade is that while Kiribati generates revenue fromabroad,thesmallsizeoftheeconomymeansthatitreliesheavilyonimportedgoodstomeet its essentialneeds.Inordertofinanceitsdevelopment needsandpayforgoodsproduceddomesticallyandoverseas,Kiribatigenerates foreign exchange revenue in a number of ways. Actual exports of goods (shown in Figure 2.4) and services aresmall.Inrecentyears,remittancesfromseafarersandworkersoverseas(e.g.ontheNewZealandRSEscheme)weregreaterthanthetotalvalueofexportssentabroad.Revenuefromfishinglicenceshasbeenakeysourceofforeignexchange,but canvary substantially fromyear to yeardue to themigratorynatureof thefishstock. Inaddition,thelongtermsustainabilityofthefisherysectordependsonthesuccessofregionalstockconservationefforts.Inaddition,theGovernmentinpastyears,hasreliedonwithdrawalsfromtheRevenueEqualisationReserveFund(RERF)althoughthelong-termpolicyistomaintaintheRERFataconstantlevel.Overall,thetradefiguresshowthatKiribatineedstodiversifyawayfromvulnerablesourcesofforeignexchange(fishinglicencerevenues,aidandRERFincome),towardsincreasedremittancesandexportsofgoodsandservices.
Figure 2.4 Imports and Exports, 1974 to 2016
2.4.1. Goods Imports
ThevalueofimportsintoKiribatiwasAUD$118.9min2014,oraround57percentofthecountry’soveralleconomicoutput.Themainimportedgoodsarefooditems(accountingfor35percentofthetotalimportbill),followedbyfuel(25percent),machineryandtransportequipment(15percent),manufacturedgoods(11percent),beveragesandtobaccoandchemicals(Fig2.4.1).GivenKiribati’srelianceonimports,smallreductionsinthecostofimportedgoodscouldprovidegreaterbenefitsthanevenmodestincreasesinexportsfromcurrentlevels.
Figure 2.4.1: Share of Imported Goods, 2006-10
The government recognises the possible challenges and operates a number of policies to lower the cost of imports. Inthiscontext,thegovernmentimplementedtaxreformin2014whichledtotheabolitionof importdutiesandtheadoptionofVAT,reducingalltariffratestozero.KiribatiisthereforeconsideredtobeanopentradingnationinthePacific(includingAustraliaandNewZealand)alongsideHongKongasshowninFig2.4.2.Kiribatihoweverrecognises that there are further steps that can be taken to lower the cost of imports both at the border and in the economy through trade facilitation policy measures.
Overthelast15years,therehasbeenasignificantshiftinthesourceofimportedgoodsintoKiribati.Attheturnofthecentury,thelargestimportsourcebyfarwasAustralia,followedbyFiji,JapanandNewZealand.Today,FijiisthemainsourceofimportsaheadofJapan,China,AustraliaandKorea.GrowthofimportsfromFijihighlightstheimportance of regional trade relationships. The growth of imports from China also suggests a shift towards lower costgoods,bringingbenefitsforconsumersintermsoflowerprices,whencomplementedwithgoodcorrespondingpolicies related to consumer and product quality.
Figure 2.4.2: Avg. Weighted Traffic Rates in FICs, 2015
2.4.2. Goods Exports
AnalysisofexportsfromKiribatiisdifficultduetolimitationsintheconsistencyandaccuracyofthedata.Thekeyexportsrecordedoverrecentyearshavebeencoconutproducts,seacucumber,sharkfinand,inlateryears,fish(tuna)products.Receiptsfromcoconut-relatedproductshowever,havefluctuatedinrecentyears.
TheexportationoffishbeganstronglyaftertheestablishmentofKiribatiFishLimited(KFL)in2014.Themostaccurateexportstatisticshowever,comefromtheindustryitself.RecentstatisticsfromCustomsforthefirsteightmonthsof2015suggestthatfishexports(valuedatAUD$2.2mfromJanuarytoAugust)havebeguntoovertakecoconutproducts(AUD$1.2mforthesameperiod)forthefirsttimeinthatyearandhavesinceincreasedfurther (Fig 2.4.3)
Food 35%
Mineral fuels 25%
Mach. & transport equip 15%
Manufactured goods
Beverages & tobacco 7%
Chemicals 5%
Crude materials 1%Oils & fats 1%
Crude materials 1%
Exports Imports
200,000
100,000
1974
1977
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
2007
2010
2013
2016
0
Fiji Samoa Solomon Is
Tonga Vanuatu Australia New Zealand
Kiribati
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
10.69.9
7.7
5.75.0
1.91.3 0.0
Source: National Statistics Office
Source: National Statistics Office
Source: National Statistics Office
10 11TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Figure 2.5: Revenue, Expenditure, Deficits and Surpluses, Kiribati, 2007-2016
Source: MFED
TheRERFalsoprovidesafinancingfunctionforrecurrentdeficits.Attheendof2016,thesovereignwealthfund,theRERF,stoodatAUD$868.1m.WhileRERFhasbeeninstrumentalinsupplementingrecurrentdeficits,strengtheningthe management of RERF is critical towards ensuring long term macroeconomic sustainability.
The TPF places the highest premium on a stable macroeconomic environment. A stable macro-economicenvironment is theonlyway inwhichtheconfidenceamong investorsandthepubliccanbemaintained. Italsoworksinfavourofthepoorwhotendtolosethemostduringperiodsofinflation.Inthiscontext,theGovernmentwill seek to manage expenditure prudently and provide the necessary resources to achieve sustainable economic growth. Fiscal measures to accelerate macroeconomic stability for long-term sustainable development will beimplemented,alongsidemeasuresto improvethegatheringofstatisticsformanagingandmonitoringeconomicdevelopment.
Policy Measures
Inordertomaintainmacroeconomicstability,theGovernmentwill:
• Continuously maintain and update the management of the RERF through regular monitoring of RERF asset performanceandefficientutilisationofRERFassets;
• IncreaseGovernmentrevenuebymaintainingandimprovingexistingplanstoexpandtherevenuebase;and• Improvedatabasecollectionandrecordingbystrengthening theNationalStatisticsOffice’s (NSO’s) inputand
collections.
Figure 2.4.3: Exports 1996-2016
2.5 Macroeconomic Policy
Government has undertaken a number of important macroeconomic policy reforms in recent years in response to the poor growth performance and fiscal sustainability issues that arose in the years directly following theGlobalFinancialCrisis.ThisperiodsawasignificantdeclineinthevalueoftheRERF,fallingrevenuesfromfishinglicencesandfromtax,underperformancefromStateOwnedEnterprises(SOEs),aswellasshortcomings indebtmanagement,leadingtoreductionsinGovernmentexpendituresandunsustainablegrowthinfiscaldeficit.
In2013,theGovernmentadoptedanEconomicReformProgramme(ERP)thatincludedtheintroductionofValueAddedTax(VAT),areductioninimporttariffs,commitmentstoreformthecountry’sunderperformingStateOwnedEnterprises (SOEs), changes in themanagement of the RERF portfolio and improved debtmanagement. Thesereformsalsocoincidedwithsignificant increases infishing licence revenueunder theVesselDayScheme (VDS),which together have resulted in a return to a positive fiscal balance for 2014 and 2015. This has allowed theGovernmenttoreplenishtheRERF.Largeinflowsofdevelopmentassistancefortheaforementionedinfrastructureprojectsalsoprovidedasignificantboosttogrowthperformanceinthisperiod,resultinginstrongGDPgrowthin2015.
Kiribati has maintained consistent improvement in revenue generation since 2010. Total revenue in 2016 was AUD$176.9mwhileexpenditurewasAUD$175.4min2016,resultinginasurplusofAUD$1.5m.Thisishigherthanthe total revenue generated of AUD$84.3m and the total expenditure of AUD$95.1m incurred in 2010 (Figure 2.5).Generally, Kiribati has experienced relative fiscal stability over the yearsdue to strongpublic expenditure,infrastructuredevelopmentandthegrowthinrevenuefromfishinglicencesandtheexpansionofitsrevenuebasethrough tax reforms associated with the implementation of VAT.
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Coconut Fish and Marine Other Re-exports
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2007
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
61.4 67.4 69.6 84.3 62.291.3
126.8
187.8
253.3
170.6
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Revenue Expenditure Deficit/Surplus
A$ M
illio
ns
Source: National Statistics Office
12 13TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
3. Trade and Sustainable DevelopmentTrade is essential for Kiribati’s long term sustainable development. The main channel through which trade supports progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is through its direct contribution toeconomicgrowth,and the incomesand livelihoodsof I-Kiribati.Other importantchannels include the impactof trade in improving outcomes in areas of health, education, communication and convenience throughwhichI-Kiribaticanlivetheirlives.
Figure 3.1. Overall Framework for How Trade, defined broadly as ‘Exchanges’ or ‘Transactions’ between individuals, contributes to Development
EfficienttradethroughimprovedprocessesattheborderareexpectedtolowerthepriceofgoodsandservicesthatareusedeverydaybyI-Kiribati,fromfoodtohardwaretomobilephones.Increasedlevelsoftrade–domesticallyandinternationally–contributetoincreasedGovernmentrevenues,allowingtheGovernmenttoprovideservicesand infrastructure and reducing dependence on overseas aid.
Enablers of Trade: Skills, Transport and Connections, IT, Business Environment, Private Sector Development, Market Access, Trade Facilitation, Intellectual Property
Increased Exports:
Goods and Services
Com
plem
enta
ry P
olic
ies
Increased Production
Increased Government Revenue
Employment
Higher Incomes
Economic Growth and Development
Lower Costs
Increased Investment
Increased Domestic
Trade
Cheaper Imports
Increased Economic Exchanges (Trade)
Improved Sector Policies: Fisheries, Agriculture, Labour Mobility, Tourism, Other
14 15TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
3.1 Trade and Health: Ensuring a Healthier Kiribati
Engagement in domestic and international trade should contribute to the healthy and sustainable development of citizensofKiribati.TheGovernment’soverallstanceisthatexchangesofgoodsandservicescontributesignificantlytowell-beingandsustainabledevelopment,andtradedoesnotbyitselfleadtounhealthyoutcomes.Nevertheless,there are concerns that an increase in consumer choices brought by greater availability of more convenient foodstuffsofpoornutritionalvalueaswellastobaccoandalcoholarecontributingtopoorerhealthoutcomesinthePacificIslands,contributingtohighlevelsofnon-communicablediseases(NCDs)andprematuredeath.
In Kiribati, the prevalence of NCDs is increasing, and consequently consuming an increasing proportion of thepublicexpendituretowardstheHealthbudget.ThemostcommonNCDisdiabetes,withaprevalencerateof15.7per cent as shown in the most recent WHO Steps Survey in 2015. This survey also showed that 83.6 per cent of the population have three or more risk factors in developing NCDs1,anincreasefrom79.0percentin2006.TheWorldBankestimatesthatby2040,theeconomicburdenofNCDsinKiribatiwillamountto9.2percentof2010GDPandabout11percentoftheeffectivelabourforcewillbelostduetoNCD-relatedprematuremortalityanddisability.
Nationally,Government can encourage reduced consumptionof unhealthy foodproducts andpromotehealthyalternativesthroughthetaxationsystem,bordercontrols(customsandbiosecurity),theFoodSafetyRegulationsFramework, the National Quality Policy Framework, other policies and investments to increase the supply andavailability of fresh local agricultural and fisheries products, and the adoption of regional and internationalconventions relating to trade and public health. Government has also developed a draft Food and Nutrition Security Policy, and a draft National NCDMulti-Sectoral Strategic Plan for a coherent cross-Governmental approach toNCDs.TheMinistryofHealthandMedicalServices(MHMS)hasalsoprioritiseditseffortsonNCDissuesthroughinterventions aimed at prevention and management.
The Government’s overall policy is to ensure that international and domestic commerce is regulated in ways whichareconsistentwithpublichealthobjectives,withmeasuresdesignedthatconformtorelevantinternationalobligations and through best practices.
Policy Measures
InordertopromotethehealthyandsustainabledevelopmentofKiribati’scitizens,the
Government will:• Ensure the trade policy is consistent with public health objectives and the country’s obligations in regional trade
agreementsrelatingtoSanitaryandPhytosanitary(SPS)MeasuresandTechnicalBarrierstoTrade(TBT);• AdoptandeffectivelyimplementtheNationalNCDMulti-SectoralStrategicPlan;and• AdoptandeffectivelyimplementthedraftFoodandNutritionSecurityPolicy.• Adopt regulatory measures to ensure public health objectives while ensuring such measures are in line with the
country’s obligations in regional trade agreements.
1 RiskfactorsofdevelopingNCDsincludebeingcategorisedasoverweightorobese,beingphysicallyinactive,eatinglessfruitsandvegetables,consumingtobaccoandalcoholaswellashavinghighbloodpressure,bloodglucoseandbloodcholesterollevels.
3.2 Inclusive Trade: Spreading the Benefits of Trade to All I-Kiribati
Tradeneedstogenerateeconomicgrowththatissustainableandbroad-based.Inparticular,thebenefitsoftradeneed to reachmarginalised groups, including women, youth, disabled people and those on the outer islands.Analysisofthe2015Censusshowsthattheparticipationrateofwomeninthelabourforceisaround58percent,which is higher than other PICs but still below the average in developed countries (Figure 3.2.1). Figure 3.2.2 shows thatunemploymentamongwomen(43.5percent)wassignificantlyhigherthanthatofmen(33percent).
Figure 3.2.1: Female (15+) Labour ForceParticipation Rate in Selected PICS
Source: Population Census 2015 Source: Population Census 2015
A comparison of the quality of employment – in terms of types of jobs – thatwomenparticipate in, present acomplexpictureas indicated inFigure3.2.3.Althoughwomenaremore likelytobeengagedin lower-value jobssuchashandicraftproduction,therearefewerwomenengagedinotherlower-valueareassuchascopracutting.At the same time, sectors such as distribution (retail and wholesale) and finance are more gender-balanced.Governmentisanimportantemployerofwomen,andwomenaremuchmorelikelythanmentobeemployedintheeducationandhealthsectors.Inadditiontoformalsectorsofemployment,womenarealsomorelikelytobeinvolved in informal and unrecorded work.
Figure 3.2.3: Total Employment by Sector and Gender, selected sectors (with gender ratio by sector in percent)
Source: Population Census 2015
Figure 3.2.2: Unemployment: work-seekers as percentage of labour force
Vanu
atu
0
50
Kiri
bati
Tong
a
Solo
mon
Is.
Fiji
Sam
oa
0%
50%
100%
Men Women
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000MenWomen
27%38% 49%
18%69%
26% 70% 92% 7% 60% 62% 8% 49%
Agr
icul
ture
Publ
ic A
dmin
Who
lesa
le &
Reta
il
Fish
erie
s
Educ
atio
n
Tran
spor
t
Hea
lth
Han
dicr
afts
Cons
truc
tion
Hot
els
and
Rest
’ts
Pers
onal
Ser
vice
s
Secu
rity
Ser
vice
s
Fina
nce
& R
eal
16 17TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Levelsofyouthunemploymentdonotseemtobesignificantlydifferentfromthatofolderworkers,butagainthequalityofjobsmaybelowerforthoseaged15-24.Withrespecttowomenandyouthemployment,thechallengeforGovernmentistoensurethatthesegroupsareprovidedwiththeskillsneededtogainmeaningfulemployment,and to provide continued opportunities for them to use those skills which extend to labour mobility schemes.
Intermsofouterislanddevelopment,formaleconomicactivityispresentlyconcentratedheavilyonSouthTarawa(3.2.4). Census data shows that although levels of unemployment may be higher in Tarawa (which may be due to high levels of settlement there with more people seeking employment) the structure of employment is very differentforthosewith jobs. InTarawa,morethanthreequartersofworkersclassifythemselvesas ‘employees’whileoutsideSouthTarawaonlyone-thirdfallintothiscategory,withhalfclassifyingthemselvesas‘self-employed’and15percentas ‘subsistence’.This reflects thedifference ineconomicopportunitiesavailablebetweenSouthTarawaandelsewhere,andthefactthatactivitiesaremorelikelytobeinformalontheouterislands.
There is a need to improve the economic situation of women given their direct contribution to the economy and the additional benefits that come fromempoweringwomenwithin communities andhouseholds. There is alsoaneedtoprovideopportunitiestoKiribati’syouthinordertodeveloptheirlong-termskillsandfuturepathwaystosuccessfulemployment.Thekeychallengeistodevelopeconomicactivitiesontheouterislands,includingtheLineandPhoenixgroup.Inresponsetotheseissues,theGovernmentisintheprocessofadoptingkeypoliciesongenderandyouththroughtheMinistryofYouth,Women,SportsandSocialAffairs (MWYSSA).GovernmentalsoadoptedtheLineandPhoenixIslandsDevelopmentStrategy(LPIDS)in2015.Theaforementionedstrategieswillbecomplementedbyspecificprogrammestargetingthesepopulations,andalsoalignedtoprioritysectorswhichtheGovernment has envisaged in its 20 year vision development plan.
Policy Measures
Inordertoenhancethedevelopmentofinclusivetrade,theGovernmentwill:• Ensure the adopted Gender Policy provides economic and trade opportunities for women and people with
disabilities;• Implement women’s economic empowerment programmes in sectors where Kiribati has a comparative
advantageinlinewiththeGovernment’s20yearvision;• EnsuretheNationalYouthStrategyprovideseconomicandtradeopportunitiesforyouth;• Implement youth economic empowerment programmes in sectors where Kiribati has a comparative advantage
inlinewiththeGovernment’s20yearvision;• ImplementtheLineandPhoenixIslandIntegratedDevelopmentStrategy2016-36objectives,focusingontrade
andprivatesectordevelopment;and• Formulate and implement outer island and private sector development strategies related to the Gilbert Islands
Group.
3.3 Trade and Environmental Sustainability
Tradeneedstogenerategrowththatcontributestosustainabledevelopment,andeffortstoincreasetradeneedtogohand-in-handwith strongenvironmentalpolicies. The linkagesbetween tradeand theenvironmentoccurinanumberofdimensions, fromKiribati’s internationalrelations, toon-the-groundeffortstomanageresourcessustainably for future generations. The Phoenix Islands Protected Area (PIPA) in Kiribati is an important example of how trade depends on strong environmental policies that ensure conservation and protection of biodiversity.
Internationally,Kiribatiisattheforefrontofglobaleffortstoreduceclimatechangeanditsimpactsontheplanetand is party to a number of regional and global conventions or multilateral environment agreements (MEAs). With respecttoinfrastructure,investmentsinrenewableenergywillreducetheneedforthecostlyimportationoffossilfuels,and‘earlyadoption’ofnewtechnologyisoneofthemosteffectiveareasforeffortsonimportsubstitution.Managing urban development is a big challenge for Kiribati and requires investment in sanitation and waste management facilities.
Atthesectorlevel,Kiribati’seconomydependsheavilyonenvironmentalconservation.Forinstance,thecountry’sfisheriesresourcedependsentirelyonthepreservationofspeciesstockbothatthenationalandregionallevels.Theagriculturesector requirescareful conservationofscarce landandwater resources,while tourismdependsheavily on the preservation of Kiribati’s unique natural assets and overall environmental waste management. The Government has put in place the Kiribati Integrated Environment Policy (KIEP) that was launched in August 2013 and focuses onbuilding capacity to respond and adapt to climate change, islandbiodiversity conservation andmanagement,wastemanagementandpollutioncontrol, resourcemanagementandenvironmental governance.The range of legislative instruments, strategies and policies available to Kiribati to pursue these goals areoutlined within the policy. These include a Kiribati Joint Implementation Plan on Climate Change and Disaster Risk Management (KJIP) that was released in August 2014 and is currently under review. The overall Government policy is to ensure consistency between the trade policy and Kiribati’s policy objectives on environmental sustainability.
Policy Measures
In order to ensure consistency between the trade policy and Kiribati’s policy objectives on environmental sustainability,theGovernmentwill:• Continue to implement new Trade Policy-related measures including an environment licensing system to
supportwastemanagementandpollutioncontrol;• Adoptandeffectivelyimplementthedraftwastemanagementstrategyandoilspillresponseplan;• Promoteandsupporttheuseofsustainablerenewableenergysourcesandenergyefficiency;• Establish a legislative and institutional framework to improve urban planning and design leading to more vibrant
localeconomicdevelopment;• Catalyseprivatesectormovementtowardsagreeneconomy,includingsmallscalebusinesses;• Buildthecapacitytofacilitatethenotificationandreportingrequirementsunderexistingwasteandchemical-
relatedconventionsandMEAs;• Ensurecompliancewith internationalconventionsontradeincertaingoods,e.g.ConventiononInternational
TradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFaunaandFlora(CITES);• Support provisions in trade agreements that encourage consistency between trade and sound environmental
practices;• Undertake Environmental Impact Assessments for trade-related, investment or development projects in line
withinternationalbestpractices;and• Build greater technical capacity and awareness around the linkages between trade and the environment.
Figure 3.2.4: Employment Type: South Tarawa and other Areas
South Tarawa Outside South Tarawa-20.0%
30.0%
80.0%
Employee or EmployerSelf EmployedSubsistence
Source: National Statistics Office
18 19TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
4. Trade Policy Instruments4.1 Restrictions on Imports
Importrestrictionsandprohibitionsareimplementedonlyongroundsofhealth,safetyorsecurity.TheCustomsAct restricts the import of:
• Absoluteorethylalcohol;• Earth,soil,loam,sand,mud,dust,clay,ashes,andsimilarsubstancesfromanysourceotherthansoilunlessthey
areimportedfromHawaii,Fiji,SolomonIslandsorAustralia
The following items are prohibited from import:• Counterfeit coins• Foodunfitforhumanconsumption• Indecent or obscene goods• Prohibited animals• Matches containing white or yellow phosphorous• GoodsmanufacturedoutsideofKiribatibearingthenameortrademarkofanyoneinKiribati,unlessthegoods
indicate the country of origin• Prepared opium or opium pipes• Goods bearing the emblem of Kiribati• Fictitious postage stamps• Dangerous knives• Imitationfirearms• Gambling machines• Any goods illegal under Kiribati law
4.2 Import Duties and Duty Exemptions
Following a decision taken by Government to reform the tax system in 2014 to replace import duties with VAT and excisetaxes,alltariffrateshavebeenreducedtozero.Thecurrentpolicyistomaintaintherecentlyadoptedzerotariffpolicy,whichplacesKiribatiamongthemostopeneconomiesintheworld.
Intheeventthattariffsarereinstatedatsomepointinthefuture,dutyexemptionswillbeappliedinanefficient,non-discriminatoryandpreferablynon-discretionaryway.
4.3 Fees and Permits for Import and Export
LicencesandfeesapplytoimportersofgoodsintoKiribati.TheMinistryofCommerce,IndustryandCooperatives(MCIC)currentlydoesnotchargeanyfeesforimportorexportlicenses,nordoesitchargeanyfeesforinspection.
TheMinistryofEnvironment,LandandAgriculturalDevelopment(MELAD)requirestraderswhoimportgoodsintoKiribatitoapplyforalicensebyusinganimportpermitapplicationform.Fromthecompletedapplications,thoseproductswhichareallowedtoenterwillbegrantedan importpermit,andthe importerwillbeupdatedonanyrejectedconsignments.MELADchargesAUD$5inspectionfeepercontainerforemptycontainersonly.Nofeesareimposed on the inspection of goods. The Ministry of Health and Medical Services (MHMS) does not charge fees for its services.
Island and Town Councils impose licence fees on importers of goods under the Local Government Act 1984(amended 2006). The importers pay these fees for each town that they operate in.
20 21TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Forexports,KiribatiCustomsEnforcementAgency(KCEA)issuescertificatesoforiginfortheexportofcoconutoilandfishproducts.TheMinistryofFisheriesandMarineResourcesDevelopment(MFMRD)issuesalicensefortheexportationoflivefishaswellasCITEScertificatesasawaytohelpprotectendangeredspecies.Feesarecurrentlybased on species.
Policy Measures
• Government will apply international best practice on the publication of all procedures and fees connected with importandexport;and
• Develop an import –Export handbook to guide exporters and importers.
4.4 Restrictions and Taxes on Exports
Kiribatidoesnotapplyexportrestrictions,exceptfor itemswhichare illegalunderKiribati law,andtherearenoexport taxes.Exportedgoodsrequire theusualdocumentationandclearancessuchascertificatesoforiginandSanitaryandPhyto-sanitaryMeasures(SPS)certificates.
4.5 Other Trade Policy Instruments: Anti-dumping, Countervailing Measures and Safeguards
Kiribatidoesnotapplyanti-dumpingorcountervailingmeasures.Kiribatidoesnotapplysafeguards,although itretainstherighttoincreasetariffswhereasurgeinimportsthreatensadomesticindustry.Intheeventthattheseare required, they will be imposed in line with international best practice and the country’s obligations underregional trade agreements.
4.6 Key Trade-Related Legislation
Giventhecross-cuttingnatureoftrade,alargebodyoflegislationhasthepotentialtoaffectit,bothnegativelyandpositively.Table4.1providesanoutlineofmostofthesignificanttrade-relatedlegislationwhichcurrentlyexistsinKiribati.
Table 4.1 Key Trade-related Legislation
Legislation Brief Explanation
Foreign Investment Act 1985
Establishes the Foreign Investment Commission whose function is to assess foreign investment applications, approving investment valueofuptoAUD$250,000andsubmittingtheresttoCabinet.Membersof the commission are mostly permanent secretaries drawn from key technicalministriesinchargeofinvestment-relatedmatters
Protected Industries Ordinance 1997
This legislation is meant to protect industries in Kiribati which the government feels are critical for the country and therefore requires protection. The Cabinet and the President are empowered to declare anybusiness,includingforeigninvestmentbyanyforeignenterpriseor company, tobeaprotected industry. – TtheCommission isnotallowed to do this.
NativeLandsOrdinance1977Thisprovidesforthealegalbasisonforlandownership,leassees,sub-leases,neighboursandlandpurchasers.
Employment and Industrial Relations CodeAct2015,OccupationalHealthand Safety Act 2015
These provides the legal basis for employment in Kiribati – employers’ obligations and employees’ working conditions – with which all businesses operating in Kiribati must adhere to the under the Decent Employment requirements.
Consumer Protection Act 2001 and Regulation 2004
Provides for consumer rights in purchasing goods and services. EmpowerstheMinistertoprescribebyregulation,productsafetyorquality standards for any specifiedkindof goodsandprohibits thesupply or trade in goods in relation to which there is an approved standard.
Insurance Act 1981 Provides for the setting up of an Insurance company in Kiribati.
ImportLevy(SpecialFund)Ordinance1977
Provides aA scheme for collecting levies or charges on all imports in order to pay for the freight to the outer islands, to ensuringe thatimported goods sold on in the outer islands have the same price as the imported goods sold on South Tarawa.
Fisheries Act 2010withamendments2014,FishExportRegulation 2012
ProvidesforthemanagementanddevelopmentoffisheriesinKiribati,including the control of foreign fishing vessels. The Minister ofFMRDisresponsibleformakingappointmentsunderthisAct,whichrequires the formulation of management plans for each species of fisheriesresource.Amendedin2014, interaliatocreatetheKiribatiSeafoodVerificationAgency(alsocalledtheCompetentAuthority)tothelegislationverifiesytheimportandexportofseafoodandrequiresthecertificationofexportswithcertainrequirements.
Kiribati Ports Authority Act 1999 Establishes and regulates the KPA.
Shipping Act 1990 Inter aliaprovidesfortheappointmentofalicensingofficerforvessels.
Customs Act 2005Provides for the management and control of goods entering the country. It The Act includes the a provision for setting customs duties.
Quarantine and Importation ofAnimals Ordinances 1977 and Biosecurity Act 2011
Provide detailed requirements for the import and export of plants animals and their products, as well as domestic surveillance andcontrol measures as well as the sanctions and mechanisms for enforcement.
Co-operative Societies Ordinance1977
Specifies the membership criteria, the management of the funds,and the auditing of the societies. The Registrar of Cooperatives is in charge of the societies and is appointed by the Minister of Commerce ,IndustryandCooperatives.
Weights and Measures Act 1984Provides for the appointment of inspectors, outlines their powers,defines what weights and measures are to be used and outlinespenalties in the any case of violation of these rules.
Food Safety Act (2006) and Food Regulation and Standards (2014)
Puts in place the basic requirements and prohibitions as well as the powersandfunctionsfortheofficialcontroloffood.
Copyright Ordinance 1980 Provides for the protection of property and patent rights. Fines for infringing copyrights are also detailed.
PetroleumAct(1977),PublicUtilitiesOrdinance (1977) and amendments 2010
Regulates the importation, storage and sale of petroleum and itsproducts.
Price Control Ordinance Establishes mechanisms to impose price controls on goods
22 23TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
5. Securing Kiribati’s Place in the Global EconomyKiribati is a small island economy trading in an increasingly integrated global marketplace of more than 7.3 billion people.While this provides great opportunities for Kiribati to export goods, services and labour, Kiribati facessignificantchallengesinparticipatinginglobaltrade.Kiribaticontainssomeofthemostisolatedlocationsontheplanetandisphysicallyverydistantfrommajorconsumermarkets inAsia,theAmericasandEurope.Asasmalleconomy,Kiribatialsohaslimitedpowertoinfluenceglobalmarketsandsupplychains.
Improving Kiribati’s position in the global economy will mean adopting a proactive approach to building strategic partnerships in trade and commerce. This means engaging in pro-development trade agreements and othercommercial arrangements that secure maximum benefits for I-Kiribati in terms of market access for its mainexports–ingoods,servicesandlabour–andmuch-neededinvestmenttotheeconomy.Atthesametime,Kiribatiwillneedtominimisepotentialcosts,incorporatingsafeguardsagainstlossesinGovernmentrevenue(whereriskshavereducedconsiderablyfollowingrecenttaxreforms)orinmaintaining‘policyspace’topursuekeydevelopmentobjectives.
Figure 5.1 Kiribati’s Broad Objectives from Trade-related Partnerships and Agreements
FTAs: EU, GSP(Global), LDC
Arrangements: Seafarers, Fishery Agreement.etc.
FTAs: SPARTECA PACER+, PICTA,
MTEC
Regional Markets
Kiribati
Access for Fisheries Exports,
Seafarers
International Markets(EU,
Japan, US, etc)
Investment, Aid for Trade
Labour Mobility
Arrangements: Labour, Air & Sea Transport, Fishing
Investment, Aid for Trade
24 25TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
5.1 Overall Objectives for Kiribati’s Trade Engagement with the World
5.1.1 Expanding Market Access for Kiribati-made Goods
Securing long-termmarketaccess forexports is a general goalof any tradepolicyand isusually the subjectofcomplicated negotiations within multilateral or regional Free Trade Agreements (FTA). It is important to note thatmarket access depends not just on tariffs but extends to Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS), i.e. quarantinerequirementsandotherbarrierswhicharenowequally,ifnotmore,importantinthecaseofmanygoods.
Asadevelopingcountry,Kiribati’sexportsalsoenjoypreferentialduty-freeaccesswithinregionalandinternationalmarkets. Some of these benefits depend on the fact that Kiribati is classified by theUN as a Least DevelopedCountry(LDC).TheimpactofKiribati’spotentialgraduationfromLDCstatusasearlyas2021,andthesubsequentlossofthesepreferences,needstobecarefullyassessedagainstthelevelofactualorpotentialfutureexports,andalternative arrangements available to Kiribati.
ThemostimportantissueforKiribatiwithrespecttotradeingoodsismarketaccessforfisheriesproducts(mostnotablyfreshtunaloins)thatareprocessedonshoreinKiribatiandsentoverseasasKiribatiproducts.Forthese,there are a complicated set of factors that govern access for Kiribati tuna products in international markets and affect whether they aremore or less competitive than other potential suppliers. These factors include overallglobalsupplyanddemanddynamics(whichdetermineglobalprice),theleveloftariffadvantage(or ‘preference’)thatKiribatihasoverotherexporters,the ‘rulesoforigin’thatapplytofishexports,andKiribati’sabilitytomeetrequirementsineachmarketintermsofSPS,IUUfishingandotherindustry-imposedstandards.
Intermsofthe‘costs’ofexpandingmarketaccess,themaincostforseekinggreatermarketaccessistherequirementunderfreetradeagreementsforKiribati to liberalise importsby loweringtariffrates.However, this isno longerakeyfactorforKiribatigiventhattariffshavealreadybeenreducedtozerowiththeintroductionofVATin2014.
5.1.2 Expanding Market Access for I-Kiribati Workers
AkeyobjectiveforKiribati’sengagementwiththerestoftheworldistoensureincreasedaccessforI-Kiribatiworkersoverseas. This objective is supported by the KV20 which seeks to increase the number of overseas workers. The currentKiribatiDevelopmentPlan(KDP)2016-2019,directlyaddresses issuesaroundmarketaccessfor I-Kiribatiworkersinoverseasmarkets,withatargetoffivenewmarketsbytheendoftheKDPperiod.
5.1.3. Looking Beyond FTAs to Other Commercial Arrangements
Some of Kiribati’s most important strategic partnerships at the international level have come not through traditional freetradeagreements,butinsteadthroughstrategiccommercialarrangementsinarangeofareas.Theseincludelong-termcommercial relationships for seafarerswithGermancompaniesandmore recent success in securinggreater economicbenefits frommanaging regional fishing licences.Otherexamplesof arrangements thathavea strong overlap with national trade objectives include the Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) labour mobility schemewithNewZealand,andregionalshippingthroughtheMicronesianShippingCommission.
5.2 Preferential Free Trade Arrangements and Negotiations Currently Involving Kiribati
Asadevelopingcountry,Kiribatibenefits fromseveralpreferentialarrangements thatgive itsexportsDutyFreeandQuotaFree(DFQF)accesstomajordevelopedcountrymarketsincludingtheEU,Australia,NewZealand,theUnitedStatesand Japan.TogetherwithotherPacific IslandCountries (PICs),Kiribati isalsocurrently involved inthe negotiation of a number of trade agreements that have the potential to strengthen and deepen its economic relationship with key partners and assist with integration into the global economy. These include the Economic PartnershipAgreement(EPA)betweenPICsandtheEuropeanUnion(EU),thePacificAgreementonCloserEconomicRelations (PACER) Plus between PICs and Australia and New Zealand.
Table 5.1: Summary of Kiribati’s Market Access Arrangements with the World
Market Arrangement Coverage Implications for Kiribati
DevelopedCountries(EU,US,Japan)
Current GeneralisedSystem of Preferences (GSP)
Non-reciprocalwithbenefitsfocused on tradein goods
Coverage under some schemesmay change if Kiribati graduates fromLDCstatus.
Global Kiribati isnot a WTOmember
World TradeOrganization(WTO)
All aspects oftrade: sets basictradelaw,forumfor resolving disputes
Benefitofparticipatinginglobaltraderule-making,althoughaccession is a long processcurrently beyond Kiribaticapacity
EuropeanUnion
Undernegotiation
EconomicPartnershipAgreement (EPA)
Various potentialscenariosincluding interimor comprehensiveEPA
Potentialsignificantbenefitsforimprovedaccessforfishexports to the EU. Costs interms of potential loss of policyspace.
Australiaand NewZealand
Current SPARTECA Goods,non-reciprocal
Fewimplicationsasbenefitsarelimited. Kiribati will continue tobenefitfromSPARTECAuntilPACER-Plusentersintoforce
Signed byKiribati
PACER-Plus Goods,services,investmenttrade-related issues
Potentialbenefitsinmarketaccess,labourmobility,services,investmentandAidforTrade
PacificIslandCountries
Current PICTA Trade inGoods
Goods Fewcostsandbenefitsatthispoint
Undernegotiation
PICTA Trade inServices andRegionalLabourMobility
Trade in Servicesand RegionalLabourMobility
PotentiallyimportantbenefitsonincreasingaccesstoPacificlabour markets. Potential costof allowing selective access forPIC workers into Kiribati.
26 27TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
5.2.1 Generalised System of Preferences (GSP)
Asadevelopingcountry,Kiribatiiseligibletobenefitfromthespecialschemesofleadingtradingnations,includingtheEuropeanUnion,UnitedStatesandJapan.Preferencesaregrantedtodevelopingcountriesona‘generalised,non-discriminatory and non-reciprocal’ basis and as such the system is known inWTO law as the GeneralisedSystem of Preferences (GSP). Kiribati has access to such GSP schemes even though it is not a member of the WTO (seebelow).Insomecases,KiribatireceivesadditionalpreferencesbyvirtueofitsstatusasanLDC.Forexample,theduty-freeaccessofferedbytheEUmaybeimportantforfisheriesproducts.MostKiribatiexportstakeplaceundervariousGSPschemes.Forexample,recentlyKiribatihasbeenabletoexportfishtotheUnitedStates,EUandJapanunder their respective GSP systems.
5.2.2 World Trade Organization (WTO) and Basic International Trade Rules
Most trade rules incorporated into agreements to which Kiribati is a party or which it is currently negotiating are basedonWTOPrinciples.Establishedin1995,theWTOistheprimaryglobalorganisationresponsiblefordealingwithinternationaltraderules,includingprovidingaforumfornegotiatingnewrulesandsettlingtradedisputes.
Todate,thereare164WTOMembers,includingAustralia,NewZealandandsixofthelargestPICs.WhileKiribatiisnotamemberoftheWTO,itneedstocomplywithmanyofthebasicinternationaltraderulesestablishedattheWTO.ThemainadvantagestobeingamemberoftheWTOincludehavingavoiceonissuesthatcouldaffectKiribatitrade(suchasnewWTOrulesonfisheriessubsidies),andhavingaccesstotheDisputeSettlementMechanism.Atthesametime,tobecomeaWTOmember,itisnecessaryforanapplicanttogothroughanoftenlengthy,resource-intensiveprocess.Insomecases,thatprocesscouldtakemorethanadecade.
5.2.3 Trade with the European Union
Kiribati’saccesstotheEUmarketwastraditionallymaintainedalongsidetheAfrican,CaribbeanandPacific(ACP)countries under various non-reciprocal preferential arrangements. However, the expiry of those provisionshas meant that the EU and ACP States have been required to negotiate a new set of reciprocal regional trade agreements, known as Economic Partnership Agreements (EPA), which aim tomaintain duty-free access whileofferingadditionalbenefitsthatenhancetradeintegration.
a) Economic Partnership Agreements
KiribatihasbeenparticipatingactivelyinnegotiationstowardsaPacific-EUEPAsince2005.TwoPacificACPstates(PACP)havesigned‘interimEPAs’(PNGandFiji)primarilyinordertomaintainmarketaccessfortheirkeyexports.However, negotiations towards a final outcomehave been challenging due to a number of contentious issues,including EU demands for PACPs to change their fisheries conservation and management measures, ‘globalsourcing’ rulesoforigin forfisheriesproducts, export taxes, themost-favourednation clauseanddevelopmentcooperation assistance.
GiventhatnegotiatingEPAsappearatthispointunlikelytoendina‘comprehensiveEPA’coveringallaspectsoftrade,the current policy issue is whether Kiribati should sign an interim EPA covering goods only. It is important to note thatKiribatiwillcontinuetobenefitfromtheEU’sseparateGSP-related‘EverythingButArms’(EBA)arrangementforLDCsevenifitdoesnotsignaninterimEPA.ThisprovidesKiribatiexportswithDutyFreeandQuotaFreeaccesstotheentireEUmarketonanon-reciprocalbasis.AccesstothearrangementwillcontinueaslongasKiribatiremainsanLDC.ShouldKiribati graduate tomiddle-incomestatus, theremaybeapossibility tonegotiatea transitionalextension of EBA preferences, but only for a limited period before Kiribati’s exports are subjected to potentialtariffsundertheEU’sstandardGSPscheme.Inthiscase,accedingtotheinterimEPAmaybethebestwaytosecurecontinuedpreferentialmarketaccessforchilledtunatotheEU,ifthisremainsanimportantpolicygoalatthatpoint.
5.2.4 Trade with Australia and New Zealand
a) South Pacific Regional Trade and Economic Cooperation Agreement (SPARTECA)
SPARTECAhasprovidedDutyFreeandQuotaFreeaccessforexportsoriginatinginPICsintotheAustraliaandNewZealandmarketsonanon-reciprocalbasissince1981.However, it isgenerallyacknowledgedthatfewPICshavebeenabletobenefitfromtheAgreementduetoalackofPICexportsectorsandthestringent‘rulesoforigin’.Thepreferential access that PICs enjoyed under SPARTECA has also been eroded by the impact of trade liberalisation by Australia and New Zealand. Kiribati is a party to SPARTECA and the Agreement will remain in force until such a time as another agreement (such as PACER Plus) comes into force.
b) Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER) Plus
PACERPlus isacomprehensive tradecooperationagreementbetweenAustraliaandNewZealandand theFICs,whichincludetraditionalliberalisationcommitmentscoveringtradeinbothgoodsandservices,alongsidenewerelement such as investment and capacity building.
NegotiationsthattookplaceoverseveralyearsconcludedinApril2017,andKiribatisignedtheagreementinJune2017alongsideAustraliaandNewZealandandtenotherPICs.GiventhesignificanceofAustraliaandNewZealandastradingpartners,theGovernmentofKiribatiplacesgreatimportanceonPACERPlus,andwillimplementpolicymeasurestofasttracktheratificationoftheagreementandfacilitatethemaximisationofdevelopmentbenefitsrelated to PACER Plus.
5.2.5 Trade within the Pacific Islands
a) Pacific Island Countries Trade Agreement (PICTA) Trade in Goods
PICTAcameintoforcein2003andprovidesforthegradualliberalisationoftradeingoodsamongPICs,withPICdevelopingcountriessuchasFijirequiredtophaseouttheirtariffsby2015andPICSmallIslandStates(SIS)andLDCssuchasKiribatiby2017.PICTAwasinitiallyintendedtoserveasasteppingstoneforPICstoparticipateintheglobaleconomyandtheestablishmentofasingleregionalmarket.MostPICsarepartytoPICTA.KiribatiratifiedtheAgreementin2003,andhasannounceditsreadinesstotradeunderPICTAin2017.Governmentwillimplementthe necessary measures to strengthen the capacity of the private sector to take full advantage of market access opportunitiesofferedbyPICTA.
b) PICTA Trade in Services
AProtocoltoPICTAonTradeinServiceswasagreedin2012.TheobjectivesoftheProtocolinclude,inparticular,promotinggrowthanddevelopmentinthePICsandthereductionofpovertyby,interalia:(a)providingaframeworkfor the progressive liberalisation of trade in services among the Parties and strengthening the capacity of the Parties toregulatetrade;andfurtheringeconomicintegrationinthePacificregionwithaviewtotheeventualcreationofasingleregionalmarket.
Kiribatiwasoneof tenPICs tosign theProtocol in2012buthasnotyet ratified it.Todate, fourcountrieshaveratified theProtocol – Samoa,Nauru,Republic ofMarshall IslandsandTuvalu. Six ratifications are required forthe Protocol to come into force. An essential part of the Protocol comprises the schedules of trade in services liberalisation commitments of each Party which set out the service sectors each PIC Party is willing to open to other PICParties,andunderwhatconditions.
28 29TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Government recognises the opportunity afforded by the Protocol to strengthen the economy and develop itstradingcapacitythroughexpandinganddeepeningthelocalservicessectoraswellas,overtime,takingadvantageof opportunities in other Protocol Parties for Kiribati’s own service providers. Government will implement policy measurestofacilitatetheratificationofPICTAtradeinServices.AssistancewillbesoughtwherenecessaryforthepreparationofrequiredregulationstogiveeffecttoKiribati’sProtocolcommitments.
c) PICTA – Temporary Movement of Natural Persons (TMNP)
Regional negotiations amongPICs, includingKiribati, are continuing on a TMNP scheme, the objective ofwhichwould be to draw from labour surpluses in individual PICs to meet national skill shortages and stimulate skills developmentthroughouttheregion.Aspartofthenegotiationprocess,labourmarketstudiesaretobepreparedto assist individual PICs determine their negotiating positions.
A TMNP scheme has the potential of generating significant benefits in terms of opening new labour marketopportunitiesforI-Kiribatiwithintheregion,althoughitneedstobeassessedagainstotherdevelopmentsincludingPACERPlusandbilateralarrangementswithspecificFICs.TheGovernmentwillanalysepotentialgainsforKiribatiinenhancinglabourmobility,giventhePACERPlusagreementandtheongoingbilateralarrangementswithFijiandthe Cook Islands among others.
d) Micronesian Trade and Economic Community (MTEC)
TheMicronesianTradeandEconomicCommunity (MTEC) isasub-regional initiative focusedontrade,economiccooperation and integration among the Micronesian countries. While Kiribati is geographically and culturally consideredaMicronesiancountry,itisnotcurrentlyamemberofMTEC.
Inrecentyears,theMTEChasevolvedfromanMOU-basedcooperationandcoordinationarrangementsignedin2008,toamoreformalTreatyarrangementsignedinSeptember2014.ThekeyprovisionoftheMTECTreatywastoestablishatimeframe(offourphasesofuptofiveyearseach),leadingfirstlytothecreationofaneconomicunionbetween the Member States:
•Phase1:Settingtherules,institutions,andinfrastructureforpreferentialtradeandinvestment;•Phase2:Movingtowardsfreetradeandinvestment;•Phase3:Harmonisingtradeandinvestmentpoliciestowardsacustomsunion;• Phase 4: Realising a common market leading to an economic union
The treaty also established a permanent Secretariat with its headquarters in Pohnpei in FSM. While the MTEC timeframe is ambitious, integration is made easier by the fact that the three current members are all FreelyAssociatedStateswiththeUS,andshareacommoncurrency (theUSdollar).Whilethearrangementcouldhelpimprove connectivitybetweenmembers, theeconomicbenefitsof integrationmaybe limited, given the similareconomic structures, the common challenges of isolation, and the limited scope to increase economic scalesignificantlyamongthegroup.Intherecentpast,KiribatiindicatedtheirinteresttobecomeamemberofMTEC.
Government will support and watch developments in MTEC closely for any opportunities it may present to increase tradeandcooperation,whileatthesametimeconsideringthecontextof itsgrowingconnectivityandeconomictieswith largerregionaleconomiessuchasFiji. Inthiscontext,GovernmentwillundertakeafeasibilitystudyonthepotentialbenefitofMTECinaddressingitsdevelopmentneeds,especiallyintheareaofTradeinServicesandLabourmobility.
Policy Measures
Intheareaoftradenegotiationsandagreements,theGovernmentwillimplementpolicymeasuresoutlinedintable5.2 below.
Table 5.2 Policy Measures on Trade Negotiations and Agreements
WTO
• KeepthepossibilityofseekingWTOmembershipunderreviewwhile,fortheimmediatefutureatleast,focusingattentiononcapacity-buildingandtakingadvantage of opportunities accorded by regional and other trade agreements to which Kiribati is a party or currently negotiating.
• KeepabreastofrelevantWTOdevelopmentsthroughthePacificOfficesetupinGenevathroughthePacificIslandsForumSecretariat(PIFS)asa mechanism to influenceWTOnegotiationsonissuesofconcernsuchasfisheriessubsidies.
• ParticipateinWTO-organisedcapacity-buildingactivitieswherepossible.
EPA• Continue to explore the best market access options to the EU market that providesustainableandcosteffectivemarketsforitsproducts.
•ConsideraccessiontoIEPAbasedonacostbenefitanalysis,takingintoaccount existingmarketaccessandtheimplicationsofpotentialLDCgraduation
PACER Plus • ImplementpolicymeasurestofasttracktheratificationofPACERPlusagreement
• Implement Policy Measures to facilitate the maximisation of development benefitsrelatedtoPACERPlus
PICTA Trade in Goods
• Implement measures to assist the private sector to take full advantage of PICTA Trade in goods.
PICTA Trade in Services
•FacilitatetheratificationofPICTATradeinServices(TIS)• Build the capacity of the private sector to fully take advantage of PICTA TIS.
PICTA TMNP • AnalysepotentialgainsforKiribatiforTMNP,givendevelopmentsinPACERPlusvis-à-visdevelopingbilateralarrangementswithspecificFICstoenhancelabour mobility.
MTEC and SIS Policy • UndertakefeasibilitystudyonthepotentialbenefitsofMTECinaddressingKiribati’sdevelopmentneeds,especiallyinareasofTradeinServicesandLabourmobility.
• Implement measures to facilitate free movement of persons among the SIS
Future trade Agreements
• Analysepotentialexportdestinationswiththeviewofensuringcosteffectivemarket access opportunities.
•UndertakecostbenefitanalysisforallenvisagedFTAsortradeagreementsto ensure that overall potential gains be the basis for participating in any potential trade agreement.
30 31TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
6. Breaking Down Barriers to Private Sector Development in Kiribati6.1 Overview of the Current State of the Private Sector in Kiribati
A prosperous and wealthy Kiribati requires a vibrant, dynamic and efficient private sector. The Government,throughtheKV20,recognisestheessentialroleoftheprivatesectorastheengineofeconomicgrowth.TheKV20seeks to develop an inclusive private sector through variouspolicies. At present, theprivate sector is relativelyunderdeveloped inKiribaticomparedwithothercountries,although ithasseensomegrowth inrecentyears.Aprominentfeatureisthattheprivatesectoractivityisunevenlydistributedacrossthecountry,withalmost80percentofbusinessesregistered inSouthTarawa,anda further10percent inKiritimati (Figure6.1).Businesses inKiribatiarealmostallSMEs.Whilethereareapproximately2,000businessesinthecountry,onlytwoemploymorethan 200 people.
Figure 6.1: Number of Registered Businesses per Island
Source: MCIC Business Registry, 2017
Nevertheless,privateformalsectoremploymenthasincreasedrecentlyatarateofover12percentperyearsince2010.Asaresult,theshareofprivatesectoremployeesintheworkforcehasgrownfrom24percentin2010,to35percentin2017.However,thegrowthisfarbelowtheaverageinmostcountries,andmeansthatalmosttwo-thirdsof jobs in the formal economy are still public sector positions.
Atthesametime,formalsectoremploymentasmeasuredbyKiribatiProvident Fund (KPF) contributors most likelyunderestimatesoverallengagementsignificantlyintheprivatesector,duetothehighlevelofinformalsector activity in the country (Figure 6.1.1). There are more workers in the informal sector than in the formal economy. The 2015 Population Census suggests that approximately 60 per cent of Kiribati’s working population ofaround25,000arenotKPFcontributors.Theyworkinoccupationsfromcopra-cuttingtofishermen,tomarketstallworkersandpredominantly-femalehandicraftworkers.
200018001600140012001000
800600400200
0
Mak
in
Buta
rita
ri
Mar
akei
Abai
ang
Nor
th T
araw
a
Sout
h Ta
raw
a
Mai
ana
Kuri
a
Aran
uka
Abem
ama
Non
outi
Tab
Nor
th
Tab
Sout
h
Ono
toa
Beru
Nik
unau
Tam
ana
Aror
ae
Kiri
timat
i
Tabu
aera
n
Tera
ina
Number of Registered Business
32 33TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Developing the private sector is closely linked to reforms and the overall business environment in Kiribati. SMEs needs an environment inwhichGovernment involvement is limited to addressingmarket failures and fulfillingpublicpolicygoals.Whereregulationsarerequired,businessesrelyonpredictable,fairandcost-efficientprocessesandproceduresbeinginplaceinordertomakethecorrectinvestmentdecisions.Inthiscontext,thereisaneedtoimplementmeasurestoensurethatthevoiceoftheprivatesectorisfullyrepresentedindecision-making.Aprivatesectorconsultativemechanismforpublic-privatedialoguethereforeneedstobestrengthened
Policy Measure
Inordertoenhancepolicycoherenceandthevoiceoftheprivatesector,theGovernmentwill:• Strengthentheimplementationoftheexistingpublic-privatepartnershipdialoguebetweentheKiribatiChamber
of Commerce and Industry (KCCI) and MCIC to enhance policy coherence and feedback from the private sector on possible regulatory constraints.
6.2 Creating the Space for the Private Sector through Reforming State Owned Enterprises
A key overall issue for private sector development in Kiribati is the relationship between the Government’s role in the economy through State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and issues around competition. The Government has adoptedapolicyof transferring lessstrategicSOEs toprivateownership,whileat thesame time improving theefficie2ncyoftheremainingonesthroughSOEreforms.SuchreformshavebeenspearheadedbytheSOENationalMonitoring and Advisory Unit (SOEMAU) under the MFED. Kiribati is now considered to be a leading reformer in the PacificonSOEs,asaresultofsuchreforms.Someofthekeypolicychallengesaffectingtheprivatesectorinrelationto the management of SOEs are the universal VAT Exemptions of SOEs. The VAT exemptions are said to be giving undueadvantagetoSOEsinsomesectors,wheretheprivatesectorhassubstantiveinterest.
WhiletheGovernmentpolicyistomaintainsomeSOEs,thereisaneedtoassessandimplementPolicymeasuresthatcreatealevelplayingfieldamongSOEstotheextentthatthepublicpolicyobjectivesaresustained.Thereisalso a need to strengthen the performance of SOEs by having them operate on a more commercial footing.
Policy Measures
InordertostrengthentheperformanceofSOEs,theGovernmentwill:• EnsureStateOwnedEnterprisesareonamorecommercialfootingthroughreviewandeffectiveimplementation
oftheSOEAct2013;and• ReviewtheVATexemptionpolicy toensurea levelplayingfield,whileat thesametimebalancing thepublic
policyobjectiveforstrategicSOEsinordertoenhancealevelplayingfield,especiallyinthosesectorswheretheprivatesectorcanalsoplayasignificantrole.
Figure 6.1.1: Formal Sector Employment, 2009-2016 6.3 Company Law and Business Registration Reform
Businesses are the lifeblood of a dynamic private sector-led economy. In particular, SMEs are acknowledgedworldwide as a driving force for economic growth because of their innovative and entrepreneurial nature. By taking steps to encourage the registration of existing private businesses, and the creation of new ones, Governmentcan spur investment, createnew jobs, and increase tax revenues.Movingbusinesses from the ‘informal’ to the‘formal’sectorwillalsomakeiteasiertoputinplacetherightregulatoryregimesforbusinessesindifferentareas,for example requiring certain operating standards, from proper account-keeping, to safety standards and thepossession of insurance.
For businesses themselves, there are numerous advantages and benefits that comewith registering, includingaccesstotheformalbankingsystemandinstitutionssuchascourts,theabilitytosigncontractswithotherparties(and therefore bid for supply contracts awarded by Government or other businesses) and the ability to import and export.Bothownersofbusinessesandtheiremployeeswillbenefit,forexample,frommembershipintheKiribatiProvident Fund.
The Kiribati Doing Business Report 2017 shows that starting a business is slow, costly and administrativelycumbersome in Kiribati. A diagnostic analysis of the company and business registration undertaken in 2014 recommended the need to implement measures to improve the business registration system.
Government has commenced the review of Company Law and the business registration systemwith technicalsupport from the ADB Private Sector Development Initiative (PSDI). Government will continue to implement policy measures to strengthen the business registration process with the view of improving the ease of doing business in Kiribati.
Policy Measures
Inordertoimprovethebusinessregistrationsystem,theGovernmentwill:• ReviewCompaniesOrdinance1979andtheRegistrationofBusinessNamesAct1988;• Consider the implementation of an online business registration system, bearing in mind the level of ICT
development;• Establishasinglewindowbusinessregistrationsystem;and• Developane-commercepolicyande-transactionlegislativeframeworktosupporte-filingbasedone-commerce
evidence.
6.4 Cooperative Development
Cooperative development can be a good vehicle through which the community can generate income and improve livelihood. Strengthening the performance of cooperatives can support the Government in achieving development aspirations as envisaged in the KV20. Cooperatives can provide a good platform through which the community can exploittheopportunitiesintheproductivesectorslikeFisheries,TourismandCoconut.
The vision of the Government is to use cooperatives as instruments for promoting private sector activity and sustainabledevelopment,especiallybyenhancing their capacity toaddvalue toproducts in thepriority sectorswhere Kiribati has comparative advantage.
Whilethereissignificantpotentialinusingcooperativesasavehicleforsustainabledevelopment,theperformanceofthesectorisconstrainedbypoorgovernance,attributedtooutdatedcooperative-relatedlegislativeframework.Inaddition,160outof200cooperativesarecopraagents,while22areprimarilyconcernedwithcargoandhandling,withonlya few in thekeyproductivesectors likefisheriesandservice-related industries.Anotherkeychallengeis the lack of a National Cooperative Policy to act as a holistic framework to guide Government towards more sustainable development of the cooperative sector.
Source: National Statistics Office
34 35TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Policy Measures
Inordertostrengthenthedevelopmentofcooperatives,theGovernmentwill:• FormulateaNationalCooperativePolicythatsupportsvalueadditionandprudentmanagementofthesector;• Reviewandeffectivelyenforcecooperative-relatedlegislationstoenhanceeffectivegovernanceofthesector;• Implementfinancialliteracyprogrammeswhichallowcooperativestobetransparentandprudentthusensuring
sustainability;• Promotetheestablishmentofcooperativeinkeyproductivesectorslikefisheries,agricultureandotherservice-
orientedsectorindustries;and• Implement awareness programmes to encourage cooperatives to take advantage of various Government
incentives to increase their capacity in value addition.
6.5 Investment by I-Kiribati at Home
Investment is the central building block of growth and prosperity, both for businesses and for Kiribati as awhole. At a global level, rates of investment are closely linked to rates of economic growth and development.Kiribatihasexperiencedalowlevelofdomesticinvestmentovertheyears.Lowlevelsofprivateinvestmentandentrepreneurshipareattributedtothehighcostoffinanceandlimitedaccesstocredit,particularlyforlow-incomeearnersandthosewithoutformalsectorsalaries.Problemsinaccessingfinancehaveanegativeimpactonbusinessstart-ups.
Domestic investors face specific types of constraints. Firstly, they require opportunities to invest,which in turnrequiregrowingmarketsandapredictableeconomicenvironment.Secondly,domesticinvestorsarelimitedintheirability to invest. They lack access to credit at a conducive rate of interest that would make investment attractive. Finally,entrepreneursalsolackskillsandknow-howtogrowtheirbusinesses,includinghowtheycanbranchoutinto new products and services as indicated in Figure 6.5.
Figure 6.5 Investment-Growth Cycle
The Government’s overall policy is to encourage private investment through increasing opportunities and abilities to invest.
Policy Measures
Inordertofosterdomesticinvestment,theGovernmentwill:• Design and implement financial inclusion programmes in line with best practice from other Pacific Island
Countries;• Enact financial sector legislation and establish an oversight institutional framework, considering Kiribati’s
commitmentsunderregionaltradeagreements;• ReviewSMEpolicyandregulatoryframeworktowardsthedevelopmentofbusinessservices; Harmonise,developandimplementaspecificfinancingschemeforSMEsinordertoimproveaccesstofinance;
and• Implementbusinessawarenessprogrammesonthebenefitsofregisteringbusinessestofacilitategraduation
from informal to formal sectors, thereby widening the tax and revenue base as well as the coverage ofenterprises.
6.6 Encouraging Inward Investment to Kiribati – A Simpler, Quicker System
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is an essential pillar in increasing private sector development and fostering economic growth.FDIcanprovideasourceofmuch-neededcapitaltothecountry,whichinturnfinancestheconstructionof physical facilities or the purchase of goods and services. FDI can also introduce essential skills and knowledge thatcannotbefoundlocally,suchasspecialisttechnicalknowledgeofparticularindustriesorprocesses.Foreigninvestors can also bring a deep understanding of their own home markets as well as connections to international value chains. FDI can lead to increased availability of new or cheaper goods and services that increases choice amongconsumers.Increasedcompetitioncancreatedynamicefficienciestoprovidebetterservices(forexampleintelecoms).ForeigninvestmentgeneratesemploymentforI-Kiribati,andthetwolargestprivatesectoremployersinKiribatiarebothforeigninvestments,i.e.KiribatiFishLimitedandATHKL.
Nevertheless, attracting foreign investmenthasbeenextremely challenging forKiribati.Over the last fewyears,only 5 to 6 applications are received on average each year. The total number of foreign investments applications received between 2012 and 2016 was 29. Closer analysis of the available data also depicts that not all approved foreignenterprisesareeventuallyestablished.Forinstance,outoftheaveragetotalapplicationsreceivedeveryyear,onlyoneortwoforeigninvestmentsareactually established and commence operation
Figure 6.6 FDI Applications
Source: MCIC,*2017 Figures Jan-July
36 37TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Asaresult,only21foreigncompaniesarecurrentlyoperatinginKiribati.Intermsofownership,sevenoftheforeigncompaniesoperateunderajointventurearrangement(eitherwithGovernmentoraprivateI-Kiribatipartner)whilefourteen companies are 100 per cent foreign owned. Foreign investment in Kiribati is regulated under the Foreign Investment Act 1985 (and subsequent amendments). The Act establishes a Foreign Investment Commission (FIC) madeupoftenseniorGovernmentofficialstoassessforeigninvestmentapplicationsandrelatedactivitiessuchaspost-establishmentmonitoringof foreigncompanies.Whenappraisingandevaluatingtheforeign investmentapplications(forinvestmentsofuptoAUD$250,000)theSecretariattotheFICreliesoncriteriasetoutintheForeignInvestmentAct.TheGovernment’spolicyistosupporttheestablishmentoflong-term,sustainableandbonafideforeign investment that is in line with its development objectives as envisaged in the KV20.
Inorderto improvetheinflowofFDI,theGovernment intendstodevelopabroadInvestmentPolicyFrameworktoharmonisepoliciesand regulations relating to foreign investment, including those relating to landand thoseregulatingbusinessactivities,forexampleattheindividualsectorlevel,oratthelocallevel.TheForeignInvestmentAct1985will alsobe reviewed toensure that itbuilds investor confidenceand is in linewith internationalbestpractices and international obligations.
Policy Measures
InordertoattractForeignDirectInvestment,theGovernmentwill:
• FormulateandimplementinvestmentpolicyframeworkinlinewithKV20;• ReviewtheForeignInvestmentActinlinewiththeInvestmentPolicyFramework;• Strengthen investment coordination mechanisms across relevant Government ministries and departments at
nationallevel,andtheprivatesectoraswellasregionalinstitutionstoidentifyanddevelopinvestmentplaninlinewithKV20;
• IncreasefundingandcapacitywithintheGovernmenttoenhanceinvestmentpromotion;• Implement investment promotion programmes through overseas missions, regional investment promotion
agencies and other online promotion initiatives
6.7 At the Border – Facilitating Trade
Thetradecostincurredbylocalexportingcompaniesreducestheirprofitabilityandtheamounttheycaninturnpay local producers. The trade costs incurred by importers are ultimately borne by the consumer at the store. While KiribatiabolishedimportdutiesandadoptedtheVATsystem,costsrelatingtotheshipmentandclearingofgoodsare still considered high barriers to international trade.
The lead Government agency involved in the clearance process is the Kiribati Customs Administration and Enforcement (KCAE), which is a division under the Ministry of Justice (MOJ). Other agencies that are primarilyinvolved intheclearanceprocessaretheQuarantinedivisionwithintheAgricultureandLivestockDivision(ALD)oftheMinistryofEnvironment,LandsandAgricultureDevelopment(MELAD),theMinistryofHealthandMedicalServices(MHMS),theMinistryofFisheriesandMarineResourceDevelopment(MFMRD),KiribatiSeafoodVerificationAuthority, which is involved in the export clearance process for fisheries products, Environment ConservationDivision(ECD)oftheMinistryofEnvironment,LandsandAgricultureDevelopment(MELAD),KiribatiPortsAuthority(KPA)andtheMinistryofCommerce,IndustryandCooperatives(MCIC).
WhileKCAEisregardedasthekeyorganisationinvolvedwithfacilitationoftrade,therespectiveindividualagencieshave their own regulatory environment where all individual border agencies have their own systems and processes to enforce their regulatory requirements. Kiribati does not have a single window system for trade clearance and tradefacilitation.Lackofasinglewindowsystemcontinuestobeanimpedimenttotradeasitcreatesunnecessaryred tape and duplication of processes.
Thekeychallengesarerelatedtoinefficienciesintradefacilitationduetoalackofintegratedandinefficienttradeclearanceprocesses,proceduresandsystemswhichinevitablyincreasethecountry’stradecosts.KiribatiispartytoregionalFTAslikePACERPlusandPICTA,andsoitneedstomakedomesticpolicyadjustmentsinordertoeffectivelyimplement its obligations under Customs procedures related to those agreements. While Kiribati is not a member oftheWTOTradeFacilitationAgreement(TFA),itspolicyobjectiveistoalignitscustomsprocedureswiththeWTOTFA.
Overall, Government policy is to implementmeasures aimed at reducing the complexity and cost of the tradetransactionprocess,streamliningtradeproceduresinordertoreducetheriskandtransactioncostandenhancingtheefficiency,transparencyandpredictabilityofinternationaltradeasmeasuredintimeandmoney.
Policy Measures
Inordertoachievetheaboveobjectives,theGovernmentwill:• Develop a mechanism to ensure that all authorities and agencies involved in border and other import and export
controlpointscooperateandcoordinateinordertofacilitatetrade;• ImplementcustomsproceduresthatarealignedtotheTradeFacilitationAgreement(TFA);• Adoptatradefacilitationsystemrequiredbyimportingcountries(i.e.TRACESSystem);and• Implement policy measures to support the effective implementation of the country’s obligations related to
customs procedures in regional trade agreements.
6.8 International and Domestic Shipping – Consistent, Reliable and Cost-effective Shipping
Regular, reliable and cost-efficient shipping is essential for small island countries such as Kiribati, due to theirdependence on it and to facilitate exports in sectors where Kiribati has a comparative advantage.
Container Yard, Kiribati Ports Authority
Traditional Canoe Servicing the Lagoon in Buota
38 39TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
6.8.1 International Shipping
KiribatihasbeenamemberoftheCentralPacificShippingCommission(CPSC)alongsidetheRepublicofMarshallIslands,NauruandTuvalusinceJanuary2014.TheCPSCregulatestheprovisionofshippingservicesbasedona‘controlledcompetition’model,withtheintenttoimprovethereliability,affordabilityandsustainabilityofshippingservices.TheCommission’sprimarygoalistoensurecentralPacificIslandersareabletoaccessbasicfooditemsandotheressential commodities to support their livelihoodsandeconomicactivities ina timelyandaffordablemanner,whileprovidinganenablingenvironmentforinternationalshippinglinestosucceed.
AlthoughtheCPSChasbeeninoperationforonlythreeyears,ithasledtoanincreaseinthenumberofcallsbyshipsintoKiribati,andintheconsistencyandreliabilityoftheservice.Asaresult,onwardconnectivityhasincreasedto internationaldestinations,andfacilitated intra-regionaltrade,contributingtoanotable improvement intradeperformance.Whiletheevidencewithrespecttoreducedfreightcostsismoremixed,Governmentwillcontinuetomonitor freight costs to ensure that the CPSC arrangement delivers competitive international freight rates.
6.8.2 Domestic Shipping
TherearetwointernationalseaportsinKiribati,BetioandKiritimati.BetioPortwasfirstexpandedbetween1998and 2000 with the provision of a reclaimed land area as a container yard. Betio Port was further developed between 2012 and 2014, through Japan’sODA to accommodate berthing of internationalmedium-sized container ships.KPA’s container yard at Betio is currently running out of space as the volume of imports has increased to AUD$14 Million.Ontheotherhand,theportinKiritimatiisonlygoodforusebysmallfishingboatsduetosedimentationandcoralregrowthwithinthechannelconnectingLondonPorttotheopensea.
Theseaportsontheouterislandsexistonlyintheformofnarrowchannelscutthroughthereef-flat,withdocksinonlyaselectfewislands,butmostlywithoutproperfacilitiesandequipment.Asaresult,shippingoperationsareinefficient,cumbersomeandunsafe.Inworstcases,vesselsoffloadpassengersandcargoesmilesoutatseaontosmalloutboardmotorboatswhichthenhavetotraversetheexpansivereefflatstotheshore.Thisoperation isrestrictedtohightide,contributingtoprolongedshippingturnaroundtimes.Inbadweatherandroughseas,thiskindofoperationisextremelyriskyandcasesofinjury,deathandcargolosshavebeenexperienced.
Domestic sea transport is largely dominated by the private sector though their presence is only prominent in lucrative sectors. Kiribati National Shipping Line (KNSL), a Government-owned shipping company, focuses onproviding shipping services to those routes not considered to be lucrative by private sector shipping services.
Connectivity and accessibility to the outer islands from the capital (South Tarawa) is challenging due to inadequate infrastructure(wharves,ramps,piersandports)andboatchannelsandpassages.Otherchallengestothedomesticshipping industry include a lack of published or advertised service schedules. Information problems mean that the boats do not coordinate their
activities in order to bring back agricultural produce,whilemany of the outer islands are inadequately served,leading to cargo shortages from time to time. Strengthening the National Shipping Council (NSC) could help improve coordination in the shipping industry.
The key challenge facing the Government is the need to improve connectivity and accessibility of shipping services inordertofacilitateinternationalandinter-islandtrade.
Policy Measures
Inordertoimproveconnectivityandaccessibilityofshippingservices,theGovernmentwill:• Continue the implementation of the CPSC agreement with the view of improving shipping services in the region
whileassessingtheirlong-termsustainabilityandimpactonfreight;• Developalegislativeframeworktoreinforcetheimplementationofshippingschedules;
• Adopt the Private Public Partnership (PPP) framework in developing the domestic shipping industry as recommendedintheNMTP;
• Implementpolicymeasuresincludingslipway,drydockandotherportfacilitiesontheouterIslandsthatwouldsupporttheoperationofbiggervesselsservicingtheouterislands;
• Implementmeasurestoimprovetheshippingconnectivitytotheisletsontheouterislands;and• Implementmeasuresto improvetransparencyandefficiency in the implementationof thefreight levywitha
view to meeting the overall intended policy objective.
6.9 Air Services – Improving the Frequency, Reliability and Affordability of International and Domestic Freight and Travel
AirtransportationplaysacrucialeconomicandsocialroleinKiribati’sdevelopment.Thefuturegrowthoffisheriesexportsandthedevelopmentofthetourismsectordependentirelyontheavailabilityofreliableandaffordableairfreightandpassengerservices.AirtransportationisessentialinimprovingtheparticipationoftheI-KiribatiinvariousLabourMobilitySchemes.ConnectivityoftheshippingservicesisalsoessentialfortheintegrationofthepopulationlivingintheGilbertGroupandalsoprovidingaconnectionbetweentheotherwidely-dispersedislandsin the country.
AirtransportationisalsoanimportantmeansforimprovingtheavailabilityoffreshproducewithinKiribati,whetherthesearesourcedfromoverseas,ortoassistinthedevelopmentofdomesticmarketsforproducebroughtfromthe outer islands to population centres. Government services depend on air connections between the capital and outerislands,whilebetterconnectionswouldalsoboosttheabilityofprivatebusinesstoexpandoperationsacrossthecountry.Finally,havingnationalair transport infrastructure thatmeetsminimumstandards isalsoessentialduringanyreliefeffortresponsetoamajoremergencyornaturaldisaster.
There are two international airports in Kiribati (Bonriki and Kiritimati) and 19 domestic airports among the outer islands.AirKiribatiLimited (AKL) is theonlyairlineservicing thedomesticmarket inKiribati.TheAirline is100%Governmentowned.Ithasafleetoffouraircraft–onetwinotterandthreeY-12’s.Fleetcapacityisinsufficienttomeet the current domestic demand for air services. This situation is compounded by the poor condition of runways and the lack of reliability of jet A-1 supply, bothwhich causeoccasional flight disruptions. There is oneprivatecompanyprovidingairservices,butitdoesnotplayaprominentroleindomesticairtravel.
TherearethreeavailableroutesforinternationaltravelthroughHoniara,NauruandNadiwhichareoperatedbysingleoperators(SolomonAir,NauruAirlines&FijiAirways).Governmentrecognisesthatthepassengerandfreightcapacityinairservicesarelimited,unreliableandexpensive.Inordertoimprovetransportconnectivitythroughairtransport,theGovernmentintendstopurchaseDash-8aircrafttocomplementtheexistingdomesticairservicesand pave the way for international services. The Government will also explore options to increase the capacity for international services and negotiate air service agreements with other countries to promote competitive air services andtowideninternationalaccessinsupportoftradeandlabourmobilityandeco-tourismasenvisagedintheKV20.
Air Kiribati domestic aircraft, Tabiteuea North
40 41TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Policy Measures
Inordertoimproveairtransportconnectivity,theGovernmentwill:• Increase freight and air passenger capacity through strategic air service agreements with neighbouring countries
andairlinesonthebasisofefficiencyandsustainabilityofairservices;• Improvethecapacityofdomesticflights,includingoptionsforincreasingthecapacityofAirKiribati;and• Develop a storage warehouse facility at the airport to facilitate trade through Air Freight Services.
6.10. ICT, E-Commerce and Trade
The use of information and communication technology (ICTs) in commercial activities serves to enhance trade and investment facilitationbysimplifying,harmonisingandnormalisingprocesses inaneffort to reducedelays,bottlenecksandcosts.Asaresult,e-commercemethodscanservetoenhancetradeasitcanresult inefficiencyimprovements,greatertransparencyandaccountabilityandthereductionofcostsassociatedwithhumaninterfacerequirements and human errors. The ability to electronically track and log transactions can also serve to minimise corruption,whichcanresultfrominteractionbetweenandamongimport/exportstakeholders.WhileICTpresentsa goodopportunity for facilitatinge-commerce, the lowpercentageof internetpenetrationand lackof apolicyand regulatory framework to support the development of e-commerce is amajor challenge. Other challengesinclude limited awareness among stakeholders on the linkages between ICT and trade. The Government’s broader development policy is to improve internet and mobile connectivity on the outer islands in order to realise key developmentoutcomes,whicharerelatedtothedigitaleconomyandspecificallytradeande-commerce.
Policy Measures
• Promote the use of e-commerce by the business community, taking into consideration their low level ofawareness,lowlevelofaccessandusageofICT;
• Implementmeasurestoimprovetheinternetandconnectivityontheouterislands;and• Developandeffectivelyimplementane-commercepolicyandregulatoryframework.
6.11 Competition and Consumer Protection
The Price Ordinance was enacted in 1981 as a regulatory mechanism to control the prices of essential commodities. The overall policy intention of the Kiribati system is to ensure an adequate level of competition in the wholesale andretailmarketsforgoodsthataredeemed‘essentialneeds’fordailyliving,whilealsorespondingtotherealitythat achieving sufficient levels of competition is difficult givenKiribati’s circumstancesof havingmany separateandisolatedsmallislandeconomies.Generally,theGovernmentpolicyistoreviewandmaintainpricecontrolsforessentialcommodities,whilestrengtheningthemonitoringaspectsofthepricecontrols.
Onabroaderlevel,manydevelopingcountrieshavenowmovedtowardsputtinginplacestrongercompetitionlawsasthekeypolicyinstrumenttopreventfirmsfromabusingtheirmonopolyordominantposition.Whileenactingacompetitionlawmaybeanoption,thiswouldrequireanincreaseintechnicalcapacitytorespondtocomplaintsandundertake investigations. Inthiscontext, theGovernmentwillundertakeacost-benefitanalysis,basedonabroad-rangingmarketassessmenttounderstandtheconcernsthatwouldjustifyacompetitionlaw.
Beyondcompetitionissues,theGovernmentwillalsostrengthentheconsumerprotectionframeworkbyundertakingareviewoftheConsumerProtectionAct2001andcarryoutspecificawarenessprogrammes.
Policy Measures
Inordertostrengthencompetitionandtheconsumerregime,theGovernmentwill:• Review price control regimes with a view to ensuring consistency with trade policy objectives while meeting
intendedpublicpolicyobjectives;• ImplementpolicymeasurestostrengthentheimplementationandmonitoringofthePriceOrder;• Considertheadoptionofacomprehensivecompetitionpolicyframework;• ReviewandstrengthenconsumerprotectionenforcementlegislativeframeworkinlinewiththeNationalQuality
Policy(2017-2023);and• Implementconsumerprotectionandawarenessprogrammesforeffectiveimplementationofthelegislation.
6.12 Standards and Quality Infrastructure System
Astraditionaltariffbarriershavedecreasedaroundtheworldinrecentdecades,standards(includingquarantine,food safety and technical product standards) have emerged as some of the most important barriers to trade in today’s trading environment. Any company with high ambitions needs to adopt and comply with relevant internationalstandards.TheGovernmentplaysakeyroleinsetting,promotingandenforcingstandardsforgoodsandservicesacrosstheeconomy,giventheneedforregulationandpublicinfrastructure.Inacontextofglobalisedtrade,thesettingupandoperationofaneffectiveandcredibleQualityInfrastructureSystem(QIS)isthereforenota choice but a necessity for Kiribati to participate fully in regional and international trade.
Whilecomplyingwithinternationalproductstandardscanbecostly,itcanbringsubstantialrewardsininternationalmarkets,mostnotably forKiribatifishexports.Standardsarealso important for services including tourism, thefoodindustry,lightmanufacturingandfirmmanagement.Betterconstructionstandardswouldimprovethesafetyof infrastructureandbuildings inKiribati,andacultureofapplying internationalstandardsalsocreatesbenefitsfor construction workers if they seek overseas employment in line with KV20. Technical standards also play an importantroleinmining,shouldKiribatidevelopaseabedmineralindustry.Finally,strongstandardscanplayakeyrole in protecting domestic consumers.
The Government adopted a comprehensive NQP in 2017-2023. The goal of the policy is to realise an effectivenationalQIScapableofraisingthequalityofproductsandservices,thusboostingthecountry’sexport-ledgrowthwhileprovidingforbetterwell-beingamongI-Kiribati.TheNQPoutlinesanumberofspecificpolicymeasures.Ingeneral, theGovernmentpolicy is toestablishandstrengthenanationalquality infrastructuresystem formorereliabletradingofgoodsandservices,especiallyforprioritysectorslikefisheriesandtourism.
Policy Measures
Inordertostrengthenthenationalqualityinfrastructure,theGovernmentwillimplementpolicymeasureswithaviewtostrengtheninginfrastructureinthefollowingaspectsasrecommendedintheNationalQualityPolicy(2017-2023):•StandardsandQualityPromotion;•RegulatoryFramework;;•TestingLaboratories;•Certification;• Accreditation•Metrology;•FisheriesandAquaculture;•FoodSafety;•AgricultureandEnvironment;•TourismandCulture;and• Education and Human Development
42 43TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
6.13 Intellectual Property
Intellectual property (IP) is an increasingly important area of trade policy. At the global level, there is growingrecognitionthatasignificantshareoftheeconomicvaluecreatedwithinparticularsupplychainscomesnotjustfrommanufacturinggoodsandproducingservices,butfromtheirinitialdesignaswellasbrandingandmarketinginitiatives.Rightsovertheownershipofintellectualpropertywhichincludeworksofartsuchasmusicandcinema,and traditional knowledge is increasingly subject to international rules to ensure that the owners of those rights are protected and rewarded for their work.
The Government recognises the need to establish and strengthen the intellectual property regime that creates economic value by protecting and rewarding owners of IP rights. Strengthening the national IP regime is expected tosupportthedevelopmentobjectivesoftheKV20,whichseekstoattractinvestmentanddevelopculturalcapital.The Government adopted a National Intellectual Property Strategy (NIPS) in February 2017 to strengthen the intellectual property regime. The vision of the strategy is to achieve amodern, well-balanced IP systemwhichenhances inclusive sustainable and economic development and supports the country’s traditions and culture. The specificobjectivesofthestrategyinclude:
• Ensure that the existing legacy IP legislation is replaced and that new legislation reflects the national policyobjectivesofKiribati;
• Investigate and decide whether new areas of IP policy and legislation should be implemented to ensure that the wholeIPapproachinKiribatireflectsandsupportsitseconomic,socialandculturalcontext;and
• Identify and address the capacity and capability issues related to implementing a national IP system in Kiribati to ensurethatthepotentialeconomic,socialandculturalvalueofthenationalIPpolicyissupportedandrealised.
Policy Measures
InordertoachievetheobjectivesoftheIPstrategy,theGovernmentwillimplementpolicymeasureswithaviewtostrengtheningthenationalIPregimeinthefollowingaspects,asrecommendedintheNationalIntellectualPropertyStrategy(2017-2023);
Copyright Geographical indications
Trademarks Traditional knowledge and cultural expressions
Patents CapacitybuildingofIP-relatedinstitutions
6.14 Land
Landisavitalfactorofproductionintheeconomy.Thetotallandareais811km²,ofwhich37percentisundercustomary landownershipand the remaining is state land, includingall islands in theLineandPhoenixGroup.Thecountry’spopulation isheavily concentrated in theurbanareasofSouthTarawa,where51per centof thepopulation lives. The performance of key growth sectors of the economy and the attachment of the communities tolandallaffectaccessandutilisationoflandinKiribati.
AlargeproportionoflandinSouthTarawaisleasedbyGovernmentforatermof99yearsundertheNativeLandsOrdinance.AgenerallanduseplanfordesignatedareasisdeterminedbytheCentralLandPlanningBoard(CLPB)established under the Land Planning Ordinance. Land tenure in state lands such as Kiritimati, Tabuaeran andTerainaisgovernedbytheStateLandsAct,2001,whichcombineslandtenurewithplanningrequirementsforthesustainable use of land resources.
Secure access to land can contribute to social and economic development and guarantees tenure which builds more confidence for investors, be they small or large.While improving land use is critical towards sustainabledevelopment,landscarcity,contestingoflandownershiptitles,andpolicyrequirementsinsubleasingGovernment-
leasedlandsfrom100%landownersaremajorobstaclestoprivatesectordevelopmentinurbanareasand,toalessextent,totheexpansionofpublicservices.
Weakmonitoring,enforcementandpoliticalgovernancechallengesrelatedtolandownershipcontributetonon-complianceofthegenerallanduseplan.Landscarcity,especiallytosupportinvestmentinSouthTarawa,impliesthat there is a need for substantive investment in land reclamation. Lack of a national land policy and weakadministrationoftherelevant legislativeframeworkhassignificantlycontributedtopoor landuse,especially forcommercialpurposes,thusaffectingtheestablishmentofforeignanddomesticinvestment.
Policy Measures
Inordertoincreaselanduseandplanningforcommercialinvestment,theGovernmentwill:• ReviewagenerallanduseplanforGovernmentownedland;• Undertakeadditionalinvestmenttoincreaselandareaforcommercialpurposesthroughlandreclamation;and• Streamline procedures to standardise landowners’ consent for obtaining land for public use and private sector
development.
44 45TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
7. Linkages to Key Productive Sector Policies and Supply Capacity7.1 Agriculture
TheagriculturalsectorfacessignificantchallengesinKiribatibutplaysanimportantroleinsustaininglivelihoods,most notably on the outer islands. Agriculture supports communities in two main ways. It provides income,supportedbythetraditionalexportsofcopraandcoconutproductsandsecondlythroughwidely-practised,small-scale production at the household level. Household level production also makes important contributions to food security, nutrition,well-being and healthy lifestyles. Looking forward, growth in this sectorwill be important insupportingthedevelopmentofothersectors,notablytourismthroughsectorialvaluechainlinkages.
Figure 7.1: Trends in Exports of Coconut Products (AUD ’000’)
Source: National Statistics Office
Agriculturalexportshavetraditionallybeenlimitedtocopra,coconutoilandcoconutproducts.Thecoconutindustryis subject to its own set of institutional and marketing arrangements that have been recently reformed. Exports of coconutproductshowever,havefluctuatedinrecentyears(Figure7.1).Amajorinfluenceonproductionhasbeenheavy support from the Government through a copra subsidy scheme. The objective of the subsidy scheme is to maintain copraproduction, and to support theouter islands throughensuring employment and create a cash-based monetised economy in order to reduce rural urban drift and ensure equitable distribution of Kiribati’s income and wealth in order to support the KV20 Vision.
Whileagriculturalproductionislessproductiveduetolimitedlandavailability,poorsoilsandfragilewaterresources,there is room to improve production for crops and livestock in some selected outer islands. Possible crops may includecoconuts,breadfruit,pawpaw,banana,pumpkin,giantswamptaro,pandanusandsweetpotato.Thereisalso potential in developing livestock through piggery and poultry.
Todate,commercialisationhasbeenlimitedtoanumberofGovernmentanddonor-ledinitiativesandprogramsoperatingonasmallscalethathaveprovidedlocalmarketswitheggs,vegetablesandothersmallfarmproducts.MostoftheagriculturaldevelopmentprogrammesfundedbyFAO,IFADandSPChaveon-goingprojectsonsometargetedouter islands.TheTaiwanTechnicalMission (TTM) inparticular,at timeswork togetherwithEuropean
46 47TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
GovernmentssuchasGermany,Netherlands,andItalytofundprogramsmainlybasedonSouthTarawa.Thereisa need to extend or replicate similar programmes on the outer islands with the potential of increasing agricultural production.
Whilethereisaneedtosupportthedevelopmentoftheagriculturalsectortoimprovedomesticvaluechainlinkages,thereisnooverarchingagriculturalpolicytoguidethedevelopmentofthesector.Asaresult,responsibilitiesfordifferentareasaresharedbetweenanumberofdifferententitiesincludingbetweenMCICandindustryparticipantsforcopra,theAgricultureandLivestockDivision(ALD)ofMELADforagriculturalproductionissues,andMCICfordomestic and International marketing.
Efforts to stimulate the development of the coconut sector are constrained by a lack of integrated strategicframeworktoensuresustainability intheproductionandsupplycapacity,productdevelopment,andmarketing.Lack of a policy framework has contributed to poor coordination across Government ministries and privatesectorplayers. Inthiscontext, theGovernment intendstodevelopacoconutdevelopmentstrategytoprovideacomprehensiveandlong-termresponsetoaddressingthecriticalfactorsthatwouldimpactthedevelopmentofthecoconutsector,withaviewtoensuringsignificantimpactatthecommunitylevel.
CurrentlyMELAD,withtheassistanceofFAO,hasdevelopedadraftFoodandNutritionSecurityPolicy.ThisdraftPolicyisawaitingCabinetapproval.Thepolicy’sobjectiveistoensurefoodsecuritythroughtheaccessibility,safetyandgoodnutritionfor I-Kiribatipeople.Overall, theGovernmentrecognisestheneedto implementa long-termpolicy in order to improve the supply chain and marketing of agricultural products from the outer islands to South Tarawa. Specific tools and policymeasures to achieve such an objectivewould include improving the shippinglinksandtheuseoftheGovernment’sdomesticfreightsubsidies,improvingmarketinformationaswellascurrentinitiatives to develop open integrated markets for local produce from the outer islands near Betio wharf.
Policy Measures
InordertoimprovetheperformanceofTrade,AgricultureandValuechainlinkages,theGovernmentwill:• DevelopandeffectivelyimplementtheCoconutSectorDevelopmentStrategy(CSDS);• Develop an agricultural policy which emphasises increasing supply capacity, agribusiness and commercial
production;• Promoteagribusinessand commercialisationof agriculture, includingproductionof local fruits, livestockand
vegetablesandaddresstransportationandlogistics,marketing,etc;and• Review technical cooperation agreements on agriculture with development partners to ensure a greater focus on
outer islands with potential for agricultural production.
7.2 Fisheries
Taking into account the revenue generated by fishing licenses, recently commenced direct exports of Kiribati-processedtuna,productionaimedforthedomesticmarketandsubsistencefishing,thefisheriessectorrepresentsby far the most important economic and trade sector for Kiribati. At approximately 3.5million sqkm2, Kiribati’sExclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) is among the largest in the world.
Offshore fisheries are primarily undertaken by industrial-scale vessels. Revenue derived from resource rentalstoDistantWater FishingNations (DWFN)provides a significantproportionofGovernment revenue. Since2014,fishingrightshavebeenmanagedattheregionallevelundertheVesselDayScheme(VDS),whichhassignificantlyincreasedtherevenuesfromfishinglicensesreceivedbyKiribati.Nevertheless,themigratorynatureoftunameansthatrevenuesarealsopronetolargefluctuations,whiletheVDSsystemitselfisstillinitsearlydaysofoperation.
Figure 7.2 Kiribati’s Exclusive Economic Zone
Another key development in recent years has been a commercial joint venture by the Government of Kiribati,GoldenOceanFishof Fiji andShanghaiDeepSeaFishingofChina toestablish theKiribati FishLimited (KFL) in2012.KFLprocesseshigh-valuefreshandfrozentuna(alongsideswordfishandsnapper)forexport,withafleetoftwentylongliners,supportingaround300workersdirectlyaswellasmanymorelocalfishermensuppliersthroughdomesticvaluechainlinkages.KFLstartedexportingin2013andhasestablishedexportmarketsinJapan,theUSand New Zealand.
Despitetheobviousbenefitstothelocaleconomy,currentlevelsoffishexportsofaroundeightytonnespermonthare still low in comparisonwith the revenuegeneratedbyfishing licences.KFL’s capacity to increaseexports iscurrentlyconstrainedbyanumberofsupplychain-relatedfactors,includinglimitedairfreightcapacityandlackoffacilities at the airport to facilitate exports. Expanding into the lucrative EU market will also depend on a number of marketaccess-relatedfactorsincludingmeetingSPSrequirementsandIUUregulations,maintainingtheregimeforpreferentialtariffaccess,andrulesoforigin(seesection5).
Seafood Verification Authority inspecting the fish quality
48 49TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Domesticinshorefisheriesincludecoastalandnearshore(reefandlagoon)fisheriesandplayaverysignificantroleinprovidingfoodsecurity,welfare, livelihooddiversificationandrevenuegeneratingoptionsthroughoutKiribati.ThisisespeciallyimportantforKiribati,whoselandmassisonly800km2,therebylimitingagriculturalproductionand livelihood options. Themost active commercial and artisanal coastal fisheries are based in South Tarawaas there isa significantmarketbased there,although there isalso smaller-scale commercial tradeonKiritimati(ChristmasIsland),whereexportsoftunatoHawai’iarepossibleviaairfreightandwhereinvestmentundertheKFLjoint venture is eventually looking to extend its operations.
Traditional fishing in lagoon
Aquacultureofseaweed,milkfishandbêche-de-mer (seacucumber)arealso included in inshorefisheries,whileaquaticfishandshellshavepromisingnicheexportpotential.Gamefishing,whichiscurrentlythemainattractionfortouriststoKiritimati,iscloselylinkedtotourismdevelopment.Theimportanceofinshorefisheriesinprovidingfoodsecurityintheformoffreshsourcesofproteinanditsvalueinimportsubstitutionishighlysignificant.Beyondfisheries,solarsaltfromKiritimatihaspotentialasanothermarineresourceforexport.
Inadditiontodevelopingfisheriesproducts,thereisalsopotentialforKiribatitoexpandintogreaterprovisionofservicesbothforfishingvesselsandleisurecraft.Kiribati’sfavourablelocationintheCentralPacificregion,togetherwith the fact that it lies outside the cyclone belt,make it ideal for the development of a transhipment hub. Atranshipmenthubwillrequiredevelopingthecapacityofthejettytobeabletoresupply,serviceandrepairfishingandothervessels inthesub-region, includingpurseseiners, long-liners,smallfishingvessels, ferries, inter-islandtransportation and pleasure vessels such as cruise ships and yachts.
Policy Measures
Inordertomaximisereturnsfromfisheriesandmarineresources,theGovernmentwill:• Implement theNational Fisheries Policy (2013-2025)with an emphasis on ensuring food security and safety,
sustainablelivelihoods,long-termconservationandstrengtheninggovernanceinthesector;• Implementnon-discriminatoryinvestmentpolicyincentivestoattractinvestorsinthefisheriessectorandmarine
resourceslikesolarsalt;• Developairportfacilitiestosupportfishexports;• InvestinfishingvesselsinordertomeettheSPSregulationsinexportmarketsliketheEU;• Work with outer islands in promoting investment in integrated catching and processing and facilitating exports of
value-addedfisheriesproducts;• Implementpolicymeasurestosupportthedevelopmentofaquaculture;and• Implement policy measures to support the establishment of a transhipment hub in Betio and Kiritimati.
7.3 Tourism
TourismhassignificantgrowthpotentialinKiribatiandhasbeenidentifiedbyGovernmentashavingthepotentialto provide employment and income generation, as well as supporting the retention of cultural traditions andthe sustainable management of the nation’s environmental assets. In particular, the potential for developingKiritimati (Christmas Island) as the country’s primary tourist destination highlights the chance to spread economic development andwealth beyond Tarawa.Over time, the development of tourism across the country can bringbroaderbenefitsasasourceofdynamiceconomicgrowth.Ahealthytourismsectorcanspurincreasedtransportlinkages,bringdowncostsofgoodsbyenlargingthemarket,andsimilarlyenablegrowthofothersectorssuchasfisheriesandagriculturetoservicethetourismindustry.
Tabontekeke ECO-Resort
50 51TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Figure7.3showsthatoutofarecenttotalofaround5,000visitorarrivals,around1,400werefortourismpurposes.StatisticsfromtheKiribatiNationalTourismOffice(KNTO)suggestthatthereisasignificantdifferenceintheprofileof visitors who arrive on Tarawa and those who arrive on Kiritimati. Around 75 per cent of arrivals on Kiritimati are tourists(withasignificantproportionofthosefromtheUS)whotravelmainlyforbonefishing,birdwatchingandsurfing.
Figure 7.3. Visitor Arrivals to Kiribati by Purpose, 2000-15
Source: Kiribati National Tourism Office
OtherpotentialnichemarketslikethePhoenixIslandProtectedArea(PIPA)andotherouterislandsremainunder-exploited. The I-Kiribati are known to be culturally and ethnically homogeneous with a shared genetic history,culturaltraditions,values,historicalexperienceandlanguage.TraditionalknowledgeandculturalskillsarearichresourceforKiribati.CultureisimplicitintheKiribaticommunity,althoughitsintrinsicvaluetendstobeoverlooked.Whileeachislandhasitsownculturaltraditionsandexperience,economicvaluethroughculturaltourismremainsunexploited.
Marketing Kiribati to inform tourists on potential attractions and facilities also remains a key constraint to tourism development.Tourismpromotion-relatedwebsitesremainunder-developedandinformationisoutdated.Alackofdive operators also creates a major gap in the array of tourism products available.
While therearepotentialopportunities fordeveloping tourism in linewithKV20, there isno formaloverarchingtourismpolicyorlegislativeframeworktoguidethedevelopmentofthesector.TheKNTO,whichislocatedwithinMICTTD,has responsibilitieswhich includemanaging largeportfolioofproject-based infrastructure investmentsandresultantrecurrentexpenditures(suchasmaintenance),aswellaspolicyandregulatoryfunctionsintheareasofinfrastructure,communications,andtransport.
Freshwater lake, Teraina (Washington Island)
Inaddition,tourismdevelopmentrequiresspecialistknowledgeoftourismvaluechains,coordinatingtheimplementationofarangeofdifferentpolicies,andworkingwithdifferentstakeholderstosupportthedevelopmentofKiribati’smarketinternationally,aswellasindividualtourismbusinessesatthelocallevel.Inthiscontext,thereisaneedtoreviewwhereKNTOsitswithintheGovernmentset-upforeffectivevaluechainlinkages and implementation of tourism policies.
Policy Measures
Inordertodevelopsustainabletourism,theGovernmentwill:• IncreaseawarenessofKiribatiandtheyieldfortourismproducts;• ImplementmeasurestosupportthedevelopmentofculturaltourismontheouterIslands;• Supportinvestmentinhighyieldtourismproducts;• BuildtourismandhospitalityhumanresourcecapacitywithinKiribati;• Improveinfrastructureconnectivityandaccessibilitytosupporttourism;• Improveaccesstoutilityandsocialinfrastructuretosupporttourismdevelopment;• Implementinvestmentpolicyincentivestoenhancebusinessdevelopmentinthetourismsector;and• Review where KNTO sits within the Government set-up to ensure it can most effectively coordinate and
implement tourismpolicies,andcompeteforsufficientresourcesfromGovernment.
7.4 Labour Mobility
Kiribati has a longhistory of labourmigration.Historically, a largenumberof I-Kiribati havebeen employed asseafarers.Kiribati’sMarineTrainingCentre(MTC)isaworld-classmarinetraininginstitutionwithmanygraduatesemployedindeckandengineeringpositionsbytheGermanshippinglineSouthPacificMarineServices(SPMS).In
52 53TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
2010,12.8percentofhouseholdsreceivedremittancesfromseafarersand18.3percentreceivedotherremittances.Inrecentyears,thenumberofseafarershasdeclinedduetothedownturnintheworldeconomy,ashifttowardslargershipsand increasedcompetitionfromAsianseamen(Figure7.4).Beyondshipping lines, I-Kiribatiseamenhavealsobuiltastrongregionalreputationascrewinthemarineandfisheriessectorunderaccessagreementswhich contain I-Kiribati crewing requirements, aswell as throughbeing engaged as stewards and as observersundertheForumFisheriesAgency’sregionalfisheriesmonitoringscheme.
Figure 7.4 Seamen’s Remittances, 2000 to 2016
A significant development in recent years has been access for I-Kiribati to seasonalwork underNew Zealand’sRecognisedSeasonalEmployer (RSE), andmore recently,Australia’sSeasonalWorkerProgramme (SWP).Kiribatihowever, faces competition from larger PICs with better resourced Departments of Labour, better end-to-endprocessesandcheaperair linkages.Around120-180 I-Kiribatihaveparticipated in theRSEeachyear, comparedwith1,200Samoans,1,500Tongansandover3,000ni-Vanuatu.OpportunitiesforI-KiribatimayincreaseiftheRSEschemeisextendedintothefisheriessector,whichiscurrentlybeingpiloted.
Oneimportantrecent initiative isafive-yearpilotPacificMicrostates-NorthernAustraliaWorkerPilotProgramtoprovideupto250citizens(around50peryear)fromKiribati,NauruandTuvaluaccesstoatwo-yearworkvisa(withtheoptionofapplyingforanadditionalthirdyear)toworkinless-skilledjobsinNorthernAustralia.3
Another initiativeby theAustralianGovernmentwas theestablishmentof theAustralia-PacificTechnicalCollege(APTC), offering scholarships to upgrade skills and gain internationally recognised qualifications. Around thirtyI-KiribatistudentseachyearhavegraduatedfromAPTCwithqualifications inareas includingchildren’sservices,youth work, aged care, disability, hospitality, tourism, hairdressing, automotive, electrical, carpentry, paintingandtiling.However,mostAPTCgraduatesfromKiribatiareunemployeddueto limitedopportunitiesfordecentemploymentinthecountryanddifficultyinaccessingdecentemploymentopportunitiesoverseas.OnechallengefacedbyI-KiribatiincompetinginAustraliaandNewZealandlabourmarketsisthecomparativelylowlevelofEnglishlanguageproficiency.Therearelinkagesheretobroadereducationpolicy,includingensuringfullcompliancewithKiribati’s existing policies for English to be used as the language of instruction from early grades.
3 www.dfat.gov.au/geo/kiribati/development-assistance-in-kiribati.aspx(accessed3June2017)
Finally,permanentmigrationflowstoNewZealandhavegrownrecently,asaresultofthePacificAccessCategory(PAC)Schemeintroducedin2002,whichallowsupto75I-KiribatitogotoNewZealandeveryyearforpermanentsettlement,providedtheyareabletosecureajobwithinsixmonthsofarrival.
Beyond market access, Government recognises the key role an education policy plays over the long term inimproving‘supplycapacity’,andthepotentialofI-Kiribatitoaccessdecentemploymentopportunitiesathomeandoverseas.TheGovernment,throughtheKV20,willimplementmeasurestoincreaseaccesstodecentemploymentopportunities.TheKV20vision is tosupporteffective implementationof theNationalLabourMigrationPolicy inorder to increase the number of overseas workers and create new labour markets. Government will also implement policymeasuresaimedatimprovinglevelsofEnglishproficiencyatalllevels.
Policy Measures
Inordertoincreasedecentoverseasemploymentopportunities,theGovernmentwill:• Implement the National Labour Migration Policy, which emphasises the promotion of decent employment
opportunities for domestic and overseas markets, including enhancing quality and adequate labour supplythroughtraininginstitutes;
• ImplementaneducationpolicywithemphasisonimprovingEnglishliteracyatalllevels;and• Strengthen the overall governance system in the recruitment of overseas workers.
7.5 Deep Seabed Mineral Resources
Given that Kiribati has an Exclusive Economic Zone of 3.5million km2, the potential returns from mining ofunexploited resources within the deep seabed has been the subject of increasing speculation over the years. The seabed mineral sector could be an important pillar for realising Kiribati’s vision for exploiting its resources as a LargeOceanState.TheinterestinDeepSeabedMineral(DSM)resourcesrevolvesaroundthreehighlysought-aftertypesofmineraldeposits,rangingfrompolymetallicnodules,polymetallicsulphidesandcobaltrichcrusts.
HistoricalsurveysinPICshavebeenconductedforseabedmineralresources,confirmingthepresenceofmanganesenodules,seafloormassivesulphite4,andcobaltrichcrust(withsuchdepositsinturncontainingelementsincludingnickel,copperandtitanium).Sittingseveralkilometresbelowsealevel,suchresourceswerepreviouslyinaccessible,but in recent years a combination of high demand and recent advances in mining technology have meant that seabeddepositsarealreadybecominganattractiveandfeasibleproposition,withminingsettoexpandsignificantlywithin the next few years.
Current activity is focused in three areas:• Puttinginplacethelegislativeandregulatoryframework;• SurveyandexploratoryworkonmineralresourceswithintheKiribatiEEZ;and• Securing Kiribati’s rights under the UnitedNations Convention on The Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to an area
beyond national jurisdiction located in the Clarion Clipperton Fracture Zone (CCFZ), situated in internationalwaters,isalsoknownas‘TheArea”,withworknowunderwaytoinitiateexploration.
4 IthasnotyetbeenconfirmedthatseafloormassivesulphitehasbeenfoundinKiribatiwaters
54 55TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Whilethereispotentialtodeveloptheseabedmining(SBM)industry,variouschallengestothedevelopmentofthesector in Kiribati include:
• Proper administration of the emerging industry and maintaining a transparent approach while balancing access todataandinformationwithprotectingtherightsofinvestors;
• Sustainableenvironmentalmanagement;• Minimisationofsocialimpacts;• Offeringinternationallycompetitiveinvestmentandfiscalconditionstoattractinvestors,whilesafeguardingSBM
revenuesforthenation;• Sound revenue management practices and other social measures, that will benefit current and future
generations;• MaintainingasoundregulatoryframeworkintheEEZandCCFZ;and• MaximisingbenefitsofKiribatiSBMresources.
Government recognises the potential contribution of seabed minerals towards the generation of revenue and sustainable development. To support the development of the sector, a comprehensive SeabedMinerals Policyhasbeendeveloped.TheGovernmenthasalsoenactedtheSeabedMineralsActforeffectivemanagementofthesector. The key objectives of the policy include:
• To strengthen regulatory and institutional frameworks to ensure that the DSM activities undertaken under Kiribati’seffectivecontrolcomplywithrelevantinternationalconventionsandstandards;
• IthasnotyetbeenconfirmedthatseafloormassivesulphitehasbeenfoundinKiribatiwaters• Toprovideaconduciveinvestmentclimate,fiscalregimeandregulatoryframeworkthatencouragesresponsible
investment in the country for the development of DSM activities in Kiribati without compromising the existing frameworks;
• To maximise trade and economic benefits through sustainable DSM activities that will generate additionaleconomicopportunitiesforKiribatibywayofcreatingemploymentandincomeforthepeopleofKiribati;
• ToensureequitablesharingofbenefitsfromDSMactivities, includingfair,equitableandeffectivedistributionofbenefitsfromroyaltiesandtaxes,employment,trainingandskillsdevelopment,maximumlocalcontentandtechnology,andknowledgetransfer;and
• To protect Kiribati’s coastal and marine environment and other legitimate sea user (including customary and subsistence use, commercial fisheries, coastal and marine tourism as well as maritime transport andcommunications) from the potential impacts of DSM activities.
Policy Measures
Inordertoachievetheaboveobjectives,theGovernmentwill:
• Implement the Seabed Minerals Policy and legislative framework with the view of maximising revenue from the sector;and
• Explore and exploit its stake in the Clarion Clipperton Fracture Zone while maximising opportunities for capacity buildingandaccesstobenefitsharingfromtheArea.
7.6 Strengthening Domestic Supply Chains
Domestictradecanmakeasignificantcontributiontosustainableeconomicdevelopment.Anefficientfunctioningdomesticmarketwiththeactiveparticipationofwomen,men,thedisabledandyouthisessentialforthewelfareofthepopulation,asitwouldprovideemploymentandincomeforI-Kiribati.Acompetitivemarketingsystemwillensureefficientproductionandsupplyofdomesticproduce,especiallyfromtheouterislandswheredomestictradeis still fragmented.
Kiribati handicrafts
While the Government has implemented tangible initiatives to stimulate the evolution of the private sector through the implementation of initiatives like the freight levy subsidy, linking producers tomarkets remains amajorconstrainttothedevelopmentofthesupplychain.Theconstrainttothedomesticsupplychainishowever,attributed to limited inter-islandconnectivity,poormarketing infrastructurewhereproducerscanstoreandselltheirgoods,inadequateskillsamongstprivatesectorgroupsonsupplychainmanagementandagenerallackofawareness amongst producers on the opportunities available within the domestic market for programmes put in place by Government to assist them. There is also a lack of awareness on how to make use of new technologies such as ICTs to facilitate domestic trade by improving buyers and sellers connectivity along the supply chain.
Policy Measures
Inordertostrengthentheparticipationofproducersinthedomesticsupplychain,theGovernmentwill:
• Establishanopenintegratedmarketforlocalproducetoenhancedomestictrade;• Supportinvestmentinfruitprocessingandstoragefacilitieslikefishcentresoricemakingmachinestoreduce
post-harvestlosses;• Strengthenthecapacityofbusinessassociations,cooperativesandtheirnetworksonproduction,supplychain
managementandmarketingtoenhanceproducermarketlinkages;• Implement awareness programmes to encourage producers to take advantage of existing Government-
establishedincentivestopromotedomestictrade;and• Implementpolicymeasurestoimproveinter-islandtransportandICTconnectivity.
56 57TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
8. Implementation, Institutions and Aid for Trade8.1 Timeframe for Implementation
This Trade Policy Framework (TPF) will be implemented over a ten year period from December 2017 to December 2027.Thepolicywillhaveamid-termreviewin2022tomonitorprogressandmakepossibleadjustmentsinthestrategies to ensure the set objectives and goals are achieved during the implementation period.
The TPF will be implemented in line with the KV20, national development plans, as well as other Governmentinitiatives and programmes. The Government will also ensure that programmes supported by development partners are well aligned with the TPF to ensure coherence with the objectives and overall vision.
8.2 Implementation of the Trade Policy Framework at the Broad Level
Implementationof the trade-relatedpolicieshighlighted in the TPFwill first and foremost takeplacewithin thecontextoftherespectivepolicystatementsanddirectionsofthevariousMinistriesandDivisionsinvolved,andthewiderangeofstrategies,actionplansandworkplansthattheyoversee.
Long-termpolicyisoutlinedinvariouspolicydocuments.ThisTPFislinkedtothesekeypolicydocumentswherethey exist, aswell as highlightedwhere a formalisedGovernment policy does not exist. The keymedium-termtoolsare the four-yearMinisterial andDivisionalWorkPlans,whicharebudgetedaccording toKiribati’snormalMinisterialbudgetprocesses,withestablishedlinesofaccountabilityandmonitoring.
In addition, for an increasing number of cross-cutting issues that involve several ministries, work plans arecomplemented by dedicated Government strategies or action plans where a lead agency coordinates closely with otheragenciestoadvanceabroad,cross-cuttingpolicyagenda.OneexampleofthisistheNationalLabourMobilityPolicy (ledbyMEHR,but involvingnumerousothers).Privatesectordevelopmentandtradefacilitationareclearareaswhereacross-cuttingapproachisrequired.Fortradeissues,anumberofsuchstrategydocumentsalreadyexist,includingtheDiagnosticTradeIntegrationStudy(DTIS)ActionPlan,theEnhancedIntegratedFramework(EIF)workplan,theNationalQualityPolicy(NQP)andtheNationalIntellectualPropertyStrategy(NIPS).
KV20 Development Partners Forum, Tarawa
58 59TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
ThekeytoaneffectivetradepolicyistoensurethattradeconcernsareproperlymainstreamedwithinalltheworkofrelevantMinistriesandAgenciesacrossGovernmentandbilateralaiddiscussions.Thetrademainstreamingeffortswill ensure greater policy coherence across the Government and whole of Government approach. Mainstreaming can be achieved in three main ways:
• Mainstreamtradeintobroaderdevelopmentstrategiesandsectorplans;• ActiveparticipationbyMCICandothertradestakeholdersinrelevantworkinggroupsontrade-relevantissues,
to ensure that sector policies are aligned to broad trade policy goals outlined in the TPF. Active communication is another way to ensure the mainstreaming of the trade policy across the Government and with the broader public;and
• AcoherenteffortontheimplementationofTPFrecommendations,withamonitoringtoolintheformofaTPFImplementationMatrixandaspecific tradepolicycoordinationmechanism in the formof theNationalTradeAdvisory Committee (see next sections).
8.3 TPF Implementation Matrix
Implementation of individual TPF recommendations will depend in large part on the actions of responsible Ministries andAgencies.However,acoherentapproachtotradewillrequireacentralisedandcoordinatedefforttowardsitsimplementation.Assuch,adetailedImplementationMatrixhasbeendevelopedtoaccompanytheTPF,presentingall of its recommendations in a single document and as such facilitating the coordination and monitoring of all of Kiribati’strade-relatedpolicygoalsinoneplace.
The TPF Implementation Matrix (Annex 1) contains the following information:• Policyareaandmeasurement;• Atimeframe(whereshort-termmeanswithinthreeyears,medium-termmeanswithinsixyearsandlong-term
meansbeyondsixyearsandupto10years);• Performanceindicators;• Theleadagency;and• Potential source of funding.
In order to ensure that the tradepolicy is coherent and consistentwithotherpolicies, the responsibility of theTPF implementationwill restwiththeGovernment lineMinistrieswiththemandatewhereeachpolicy falls,andthe monitoring of progress and consistency with the TPF will be the responsibility of the National Trade Advisory Committee (NTAC) incollaborationwiththeMCIC. In thisway, theTPFavoidscreatingduplicationofworkwhileensuring coherence of the policy framework. The underlying principle is to mainstream trade policy objectives across Kiribati’s policies.
8.4 Institutional Framework for Coordinating and Monitoring Implementation
Kiribati has already established a National Trade Advisory Committee (NTAC) to play a coordinating role across Governmentfortrade-relatedpolicies.ThecoremembersoftheNTACaredrawnfromkeylineMinistriesandtrade-related Organisations. The main roles of the NTAC include:
• Ensurepolicycoherence inthevarioustradearrangements,bothatmultilateralandregional levelsaswellasdomestictradeissues;
• Assist in mainstreaming trade into national development goals and ensuring proper implementation of trade policyobjectiveswithintherelevantministriesandbodies;
• Provide strategic policy advice to the Government in relation to capacity-building needs and appropriateinstitutionalframeworktohandlethecountry’sregionalintegrationagenda;
• Reviewandendorsetheoveralldevelopment-orientedtradenegotiationstrategyandnationalpositions;• Facilitatetheformulationandimplementationofthecountry’sTradePolicyFramework,Trade• DevelopmentandExportStrategies;• Identifyandcommissiontrade-relatedsectorstudies;
Cabinet
NTAC
Sub committee
Government Officials
Private Sector and
CSOs
Government Officials
Private Sector and
CSOs
Government Officials
Private Sector and
CSOs
SubCommittee
SubCommittee
• Coordinateandreviewtheimplementationofresultingtradeagreements;• Reviewtheimplementationofdifferentagreementstowhichthecountryisaparty,monitoringandevaluating
theimpactoftheresultsoftheagreementstothecountry;• Recommendstrategiestowardseffectiveexploitationoftradeopportunitiesatnationalandregionallevel;• Monitorandcoordinatetheimplementationofdonor-fundedtrade-relatedprojects;• DevelopandrecommendanationaljointstrategytowardsmobilisationofAidforTrade(AfT)funds;• Recommendformationoftechnicalsub-committeeswherenecessary;and• Recommend and endorse Cabinet Information and Memorandum Papers on trade matters.
The Secretary of Commerce, Industry and Cooperatives is the Chair of the NTAC, with the Trade PromotionDivision as the NTAC secretariat. The NTAC is conducted monthly. Given its existing role in the coordination and implementationoftheTPF,theNTACwillregularlymonitorandevaluatethepolicyimplementation.
BeyondthemainNTAC,anumberofsubcommitteesandtechnicalworkinggroupsalreadyexist:•IntellectualPropertysub-committee•Tradefacilitationsub-committee• Decent work steering committee• Tourism sector working group•QualityCoordinationsub-committee
TheTPFimplementationwillensurethatallsubcommitteesandconsultativemechanismsinvolveallstakeholders,includingalloftherelevanttechnicalministries,theprivatesectorandCivilSocietyOrganisations(CSOs).
Figure 8.1 Institutional Structure for Implementation of the TPF
8.5 Resourcing TPF Implementation through Aid for Trade
InadditiontoGovernment’sownbudgetaryresources,securingdonorfundingavailableundertheAidforTrade(AfT) initiative will provide an important additional resource for Kiribati to implement the policy goals outlined in theTPF.AidforTrade(AfT)isasub-classificationofoverseasdevelopmentassistance(ODA),coveringarangeoftrade-relateddonorinterventionsfallingunderfourbroadcategories:tradepolicyregulations,buildingproductivecapacity,economicinfrastructureandtrade-relatedadjustment.AfTprojectsrangefromlarge-scaleinfrastructure,toassistancefortradefacilitation(suchasincustomsandquarantine),tosectorssuchasagriculture,fisheriesandtourism. It also covers trade policy formulation and implementation.
60 61TPF 2017-2027 TPF 2017-2027
Table 8.1 AfT Activity by Donor (2011-15, total)
Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System, USD$m current
Table8.1showsthat,accordingtoAfTFiguresthathavebeenreportedandpublishedbytheOECD,aroundUSD144minAfTwasdeliveredtoKiribatibetween2011and2015.KeyAfTdonorsincludedJapan,theWorldBank,NZ,Australia,regionaldevelopmentbanksincludingADBandEUinstitutions.Allocationsareinfluencedheavilybycontributionstoinfrastructuredevelopment, includingtransport,communicationsandenergy.Othersectorsreceivingsupporthaveincludedthefisheriessector,thebusinessenvironment,agricultureandminerals.Goingforward,donorsareincreasinglyprioritisingAfTintheirassistanceprogrammes,includingareasbeyondinfrastructure.OpportunitiesthereforeexistforKiribatitorequestspecificprogrammestoimplementTPFrecommendations.
A key AfT project in support of trade policy implementation has been the Enhanced Integrated Framework (EIF) for LeastDevelopedCountries(LDCs),amulti-donorprogrammeinvolvingUNDP,InternationalTradeCentre,UNCTAD,WorldBank,WTOandtheIMF.KiribatihasalreadybenefitedundertheEIFfromsupportunderits‘Tier1’windowforsupportinmainstreamingtradeintonationaldevelopmentplans,strengtheningtradeinstitutionsandbuildingcapacity. It iscurrently intheprocessofdevelopingproposalstoaccess ‘Tier2’ fundstofinanceprioritycatalystprojectstoovercomesupply-sideconstraintstotradeandhelpdevelopsustainableexportgrowth.
AsidefromtheEIF,KiribatihasalsobenefitedfromtheCommonwealthSecretariat‘sHubandSpokesProgrammethrough the deployment of the National Trade Advisor to support trade capacity building and policy implementation.
AswithODAmoregenerally,itisimportantfordevelopmentsupporttoensurecountryownershipandpolicyspace.DonorsupporttoKiribatishouldbetailoredinlinewithnationalpriorities,andresourcesusedefficientlyinlinewiththeinternationallyagreedbestpracticeprinciplesintheareaofaideffectivenessasoutlinedintheParisDeclarationand Accra Agenda for Action.
AfT Sector Aus Japan New Zealand
EU Inst’ns
Reg’l Devt Banks
UN World Bank Other Total
Transport & Storage 8.5 34.4 29.3 0.0 9.1 0.0 27.7 0.4 109.4
Communications 5.5 0.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 7.6
Energy 0.0 0.0 0.5 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 10.2
Banking & Finance 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4
Business & Other 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 3.3
Agriculture 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.8
Forestry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Fishing 1.9 3.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 9.4
Industry 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Mineral Resources 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
Trade Policy & Reg’s 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6
Tourism 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2
Total 18.9 38.4 32.3 5.6 9.1 0.2 33.2 6.8 144.4
Share 13.1% 26.6% 22.4% 3.9% 6.3% 0.1% 23.0% 4.7% 100 %
Policy Measures
In order to improve the institutional arrangements and maximise Aid for Trade resources for effectiveimplementationoftheTradePolicyFramework,theGovernmentwill:
• Strengthen existing multi-stakeholder consultative mechanisms to ensure that trade concerns are properlymainstreamedbyGovernmentforgoodtradedevelopmentoutcomes;
• ExploreandconsiderestablishmentofaTradeActtosupportsustainabilityofkeyinstitutionssuchasNTAC,etc;• EnhancethecapacityofrelevantstakeholdersonthedevelopmentoftechnicalAfTproposals;• Strengthen collaboration and partnerships with international organisations and development partners to
maximisethebenefitsofAfTopportunities;and• Mainstream Aid for Trade in the Bilateral donor partnership arrangements and in the Development partner’s
forums and dialogues.
63TP
F20
17-202
7
62 TPF 2017-2027
Ann
ex 1
: Tra
de P
olic
y Fr
amew
ork
Impl
emen
tati
on P
lan
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
Tr
ade
and
Mac
roec
onom
ic
Stab
ility
Mac
roec
onom
ic
Fram
ewor
k
Cont
inou
sly
mai
ntai
n an
d up
date
the
man
-ag
emen
t of t
he R
even
ue E
qual
isat
ion
Res
erve
Fu
nd (R
ERF)
thro
ugh
reg
ular
mon
itorin
g of
RE
RF a
sset
s pe
rfor
man
ce a
nd e
ffici
ent u
tilis
a-tio
nofRER
Fassets;
Med
ium-te
rmIm
prov
ed V
alue
of R
ERF
MFE
D s
tatis
tics
MFE
DG
OK
In
crea
se g
over
nmen
t rev
enue
by
mai
ntai
ning
an
d im
prov
ing
exi
stin
g pl
ans
to e
xpan
d th
e re
venu
e ba
seShort-term
% In
crea
se in
Rev
enue
MFE
D s
tatis
tics
MFE
DG
OK
Im
prov
e d
atab
ase
colle
ctio
n an
d re
cord
ing
by s
tren
gthe
ning
the
Nat
iona
l Sta
tistic
s O
ffice
(N
SO) i
nput
and
col
lect
ion.
Med
ium-te
rmIm
prov
ed N
atio
nal
Stat
istic
s O
ffice
Ind
icat
ors
MFE
D s
tatis
tics
MFE
DG
OK
Trad
e,Health
an
d Pu
blic
Pol
icy
Obj
ectiv
e
Trad
e an
d H
ealth
Ensu
re th
e Tr
ade
Polic
y is
con
sist
ent w
ith
publ
ic h
ealth
obj
ectiv
es a
nd c
ount
ry’s
oblig
a-tio
ns in
reg
iona
l tra
de a
gree
men
ts r
elat
ing
to
Sani
tary
and
Phy
tosa
nita
ry (S
PS)
mea
sure
s an
d Te
chni
cal B
arrie
rs to
Tra
de.
Med
ium-te
rmN
atio
nal N
CD M
ulti
sect
oral
str
ateg
ic p
lan
endo
rsed
by
Cabi
net
MHMSstatistics,
publ
icat
ions
MH
MS
WHO,U
NDP,GOK
Ad
opt a
nd e
ffect
ivel
y im
plem
ent t
he N
atio
nal
NCD
sMulti-SectoralStrategicPlan
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
pol
icy
actio
ns
impl
emen
ted
MHMSstatistics,
publ
icat
ions
MH
MS
WHO,EU
,DFAT,
MFA
T
Long-te
rmRe
duct
ion
in c
ases
of
NCD
sMHMSstatistics,
publ
icat
ions
MH
MS
WHO,EU,D
FAT,M
FAT
Adop
t reg
ulat
ory
mea
sure
s to
ens
ure
publ
ic
healthobjectives,w
hileensuringsuchm
ea-
sure
s ar
e in
line
with
cou
ntry
’s ob
ligat
ions
in
regi
onal
trad
e ag
reem
ents
N
umbe
r an
d tr
ype
of p
oli-
cy m
easu
res
adop
ted
MHMSstatistics,
publ
icat
ions
MHMS,OAG
GO
K
Ad
opt a
nd e
ffect
ivel
y im
plem
ent t
he d
raft
N
atio
nal F
ood
and
Nut
ritio
n Se
curit
y Po
licy
Med
ium-te
rm
Food
and
Nut
ritio
n Se
curit
y P
olic
y en
dors
ed
by C
abin
et
MELAD
periodic
repo
rts
MELAD
,MHMS
FAO
64TP
F20
17-202
7 65TP
F20
17-202
7
Fost
erin
g in
clus
ive
Trad
e
Gen
der
and
Trad
e En
sure
the
adop
ted
Gen
der
Polic
y pr
ovid
es
econ
omic
and
trad
e op
port
uniti
es fo
r w
omen
an
d pe
ople
with
dis
abili
ties
Med
ium-te
rm
Econ
omic
em
pow
erm
ent
for
wom
en a
nd p
eopl
e w
ith d
isab
ilitie
s m
ain-
stre
amed
in th
e G
ende
r Po
licy
Gen
der
Polic
yM
WYS
AGOK,UNDP,UNICEF,
UN
WO
MEN
Impl
emen
t wom
en’s
econ
omic
em
pow
erm
ent
prog
ram
mes
in s
ecto
rs w
here
Kiri
bati
has
com
para
tive
adva
ntag
e in
line
with
the
gove
rn-
men
t’s 2
0 ye
ar v
isio
n pl
an
Med
ium-te
rm%
of w
omen
in b
usin
ess
MFE
D s
tatis
tics
MW
YSA
GOK,UNDP
Yout
h an
d Tr
ade
Ensu
re t
he N
atio
nal Y
outh
Str
ateg
y pr
ovid
es
econ
omic
and
trad
e op
port
uniti
es fo
r th
e yo
uth
Med
ium-te
rm
Yout
h ec
onom
ic e
mpo
w-
erm
ent p
rogr
amm
e m
ain-
stre
amed
in th
e Yo
uth
Polic
y
MFE
D s
tatis
tics
MW
YSA
GOK,UNDP
Impl
emen
t You
th e
cono
mic
em
pow
erm
ent
prog
ram
mes
in th
e se
ctor
s w
here
Kiri
bati
has
com
para
tive
adva
ntag
e in
line
with
the
gove
rn-
men
ts 2
0 ye
ar v
isio
n
Med
ium-te
rm%
of Y
outh
in B
usin
ess
MFE
D s
tatis
tics
MWYSA,MCIC
GOK,UNDP,ILO
Trad
e an
d O
uter
Is
land
Dev
elop
men
t
Implem
entthe
Linean
dPh
oenixIsland
Integrated
Develop
men
tStrategy2016-2036
obje
ctiv
es f
ocus
ing
on tr
ade
and
priv
ate
sec-
tor
deve
lopm
ent
Med
ium-te
rm
Incr
ease
in n
umbe
r of
bu
sine
sses
reg
iste
red
inth
eLine
and
Pho
enix
Isla
nds
MCI
C re
port
s
MLIPD
GOK,EU
,DFAT,MFAT,
ADB,WORLDBAN
K
Fo
rmul
ate
and
Impl
emen
t ou
ter
Isla
nds
trad
e an
d pr
ivat
e se
ctor
dev
elop
men
t str
ateg
ies
rela
ted
to th
e G
ilber
t Isl
ands
Gro
upMed
ium-te
rmIn
crea
se in
num
ber
of
busi
ness
es r
egis
tere
d in
th
e G
ilber
t Isl
ands
MCI
C re
port
s
MIA
GOK,UNDP
Trad
e an
d Su
stai
nabl
e En
viro
nmen
t
Trad
e an
d En
viro
nmen
t
Continue
toim
plem
entn
ewTrade
Policy-
rela
ted
mea
sure
s in
clud
ing
an e
nviro
nmen
t lic
ensi
ng s
yste
m to
sup
port
was
te m
anag
e-m
ent a
nd p
ollu
tion
cont
rol
Med
ium-te
rm
Num
ber
of n
ew tr
ade
pol-
icy
mea
sure
s es
tabl
ishe
d to
sup
port
was
te m
anag
e-m
ent
MCI
C re
cord
sM
CIC
GO
K
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
env
ironm
enta
l lic
ence
s is
sued
MELAD
records
MELAD
GO
K
Ad
opt a
nd e
ffect
ivel
y im
plem
ent t
he d
raft
W
aste
Man
agem
ent S
trat
egy
and
oil s
pill
resp
onse
pla
nShort-term
cabi
net e
ndor
ses
the
was
te m
anag
emen
t str
at-
egy
and
oil s
pill
resp
onse
pl
an
MELAD
ann
ual
repo
rtM
ARIN
E D
ivis
ion
GEF
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r po
licy
mea
sure
s im
plem
ente
d MELAD
ann
ual
repo
rtMELAD
GO
K
Pr
omot
e an
d su
ppor
t the
use
of s
usta
inab
le
rene
wab
le e
nerg
y so
urce
s an
d en
ergy
effi
cien
tMed
ium-te
rmIn
crea
se in
sha
re o
f grid
co
nnec
ted
to r
enew
able
en
ergy
M
ISE
repo
rts
MIS
EG
EF
Ca
taly
se p
rivat
e se
ctor
mov
emen
t tow
ards
greenecon
omy,includ
ingsmallscalebusiness
Med
ium-te
rm
Incr
ease
in %
of b
usin
ess-
es in
corp
orat
ing
clim
ate
chan
ge a
nd d
isas
ter
risks
in
thei
r st
rate
gic
and
busi-
ness
pla
n
MIS
E re
port
s MISE,KCC
I,MCIC
GEF
Med
ium-te
rm
Incr
ease
in n
umbe
r of
bu
sine
sses,includingfish-
eriesan
dtourismsectors,
adop
ting
gree
n in
itiat
ives
MISE,M
FMRD
,M
ICTT
D r
epor
tsMFM
RD,M
ICTTD
GEF
Esta
blis
h a
legi
slat
ive
and
inst
itutio
nal
fram
e-w
ork
to im
prov
e ur
ban
plan
ning
and
des
ign
le
adin
g to
mor
e vi
bran
t loc
al e
cono
mic
dev
el-
opm
ent
Med
ium-te
rm
Num
berofBylaw
s,
Nat
iona
l Urb
an P
olic
y Develop
ed,N
umbe
rof
LEDProjectsim
plem
ented;
MIA
ann
ual r
epor
tsM
IANZ,ROC(TA
IWAN
),GOK,UNDP
Bu
ild c
apac
ity to
faci
litat
e th
e no
tific
atio
n an
d re
port
ing
requ
irem
ents
und
er e
xist
ing
was
te
andchem
ical-related
con
ventions
Med
ium-te
rm
Com
plia
nce
repo
rts
MELAD
ann
ual
repo
rts
MELAD
,KCA
EMFAT,DFAT,EU
Ensu
re c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith in
tern
atio
nal c
onve
n-tio
ns o
n tr
ade
in c
erta
in g
oods
e.g
. con
vent
ion
on I
nter
natio
nal T
rade
in E
ndan
gere
d Sp
ecie
s of
Wild
Fau
na a
nd F
lora
(CIT
ES)
Med
ium-te
rmCa
bine
t end
orse
s ac
ces-
sion
to C
ITES
MFM
RD r
ecor
dsMCIC,M
ELAD
MFAT,DFAT,EU
Su
ppor
t pro
visi
ons
in tr
ade
agre
emen
ts th
at
enco
urag
e co
nsis
tenc
y be
twee
n tr
ade
and
soun
d en
viro
nmen
tal p
ract
ices
Ong
oing
Tr
ade
agre
emen
ts s
igne
d ar
e co
nsis
tent
with
sou
nd
envi
ronm
enta
l pra
ctic
esM
CIC
reco
rds
MCI
CG
OK
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
66TP
F20
17-202
7 67TP
F20
17-202
7
Und
erta
ke E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct
Assessmen
tsfo
rtrad
e-relatedordevelop
men
tpr
ojec
ts in
line
with
inte
rnat
iona
l bes
t pra
c-tic
es
Med
ium-te
rmEn
viro
nmen
tal A
sses
smen
t Re
port
sMELAD
ann
ual
repo
rtMELAD
GO
K
Bu
ild g
reat
er te
chni
cal a
war
enes
s ar
ound
link-
ages
bet
wee
n tr
ade
and
envi
ronm
ent
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
Tra
inin
gs
unde
rtak
en M
CIC
repo
rts
MCI
CG
OK
Fees
and
Per
mits
fo
r Im
port
and
Ex
port
D
evelop
anim
port–Expo
rthan
dboo
kto
guid
e ex
port
ers
and
Impo
rter
s M
ediu
m T
erm
Impo
rt-ExportH
andb
ook
Dev
elop
edM
CIC
Web
site
MCI
CGOK,PT&I
Ap
ply
inte
rnat
iona
l bes
t pra
ctic
e on
the
pub-
licat
ion
of a
ll pr
oced
ures
and
fees
con
nect
ed
with
impo
rt a
nd e
xpor
tMed
ium-te
rmPu
blic
atio
ns u
ploa
ded
on
Web
site
Web
site
link
MCIC,M
OJ
GO
K
Secu
ring
Plac
e in
th
e G
loba
l Eco
nom
y
WTO
Mem
bers
hip
Keep
pos
sibi
lity
of s
eeki
ng W
TO m
embe
rshi
p un
der
revi
ew w
hile
focu
sing
att
entio
n fo
r th
e im
med
iate
futu
re a
t lea
st o
n ca
paci
ty b
uild
ing
and
taki
ng a
dvan
tage
of o
ppor
tuni
ties
acc
ord-
ed b
y re
gion
al a
nd o
ther
trad
e ag
reem
ents
to
whi
ch K
iriba
ti is
a p
arty
or
curr
ently
neg
otia
t-in
g
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
New
Reg
iona
l Tr
ade
Agre
emen
ts s
igne
d an
d ra
tifie
dM
CIC
annu
al r
epor
tM
CIC
GO
K
Keep
abr
east
of r
elev
ant W
TO d
evel
opm
ents
th
roug
h th
e Pa
cific
Offi
ce in
Gen
eva
thro
ugh
the
Paci
fic Is
land
s Fo
rum
Sec
reta
riat (
PIFS
) as
a m
echa
nism
to in
fluen
ce W
TO n
egot
iatio
ns o
n is
sues
of c
once
rn s
uch
us fi
sher
ies
subs
idie
s
Med
ium-te
rm
Num
ber
of T
rade
N
egot
iatio
n po
sitio
n pa
pers
thro
ugh
PIFS
offi
ce
in G
enev
a
MCI
C an
nual
rep
ort
MCI
CWTO
,PIFS
ParticipateinW
TO-Organ
ised
cap
acitybuilding
activ
ities
whe
re p
ossi
ble
Med
ium-te
rmNum
berofW
TO-organ
ised
ac
tiviti
es a
tten
ded
by
Kirib
ati
MCI
C an
nual
rep
ort
MCI
CWTO
,PIFS
Num
berofW
TOe-learning
co
urse
s u
nder
take
n by
Ki
ribat
i offi
cial
sM
CIC
annu
al r
epor
tM
CIC
WTO
EPA
Cont
inue
to e
xplo
re th
e be
st m
arke
t acc
ess
optio
ns to
the
EU M
arke
t tha
t pro
vide
sus
tain-
ableand
cost-e
ffectivemarketsfo
ritsprodu
cts
Med
ium-te
rmSu
stai
ned
incr
ease
in
expo
rts
to E
UM
FED
sta
tistic
sMCIC/MFAI
EU,G
OK
Consideraccession
toIEPA
,based
onacost
bene
fitana
lysis,ta
kingintoaccou
ntexisting
marketa
ccess,and
theim
plicationsofp
oten
-tialLDCgrad
uatio
n
Med
ium-te
rmRe
com
men
datio
ns o
f th
e Co
st B
enef
it An
alys
is
impl
emen
ted
MCI
C an
nual
rep
ort
MCIC/MFAI
GOK,EU
Im
plem
entp
olicymeasurestofa
st-trackthe
ratif
icat
ion
of P
ACER
Plu
s ag
reem
ent
Short-term
Kirib
ati r
atifi
es P
ACER
Plu
sM
CIC
annu
al
repo
rt/In
strumen
tof
Acc
essi
onMCIC,M
FAI
DFAT,M
FAT
Im
plem
ent p
olic
y m
easu
res
to fa
cilit
ate
the
max
imis
atio
n of
dev
elop
men
t ben
efits
rel
ated
to
PAC
ER P
lus
Med
ium-te
rmIn
crea
se in
exp
orts
to
PACE
R Pl
us p
artie
s M
FED
sta
tistic
sM
CIC
DFAT,M
FAT
Im
plem
ent P
olic
y m
easu
res
to a
ssis
t the
pri-
vate
sec
tor
to ta
ke fu
ll ad
vant
age
of P
ICTA
Tr
ade
in G
oods
Med
ium-te
rmIn
crea
se in
Exp
orts
to
PICT
A pa
rtie
s M
FED
sta
tistic
sM
CIC
PIFS
PICT
A Tr
ade
in
Serv
ices
Faci
litat
e th
e ra
tific
atio
n of
PIC
TA T
rade
in
Serv
ices
.Med
ium-te
rm
Kirib
ati R
atifi
es P
ICTA
Tr
ade
in S
ervi
ces
MCI
C an
nual
repo
rt/In
strumen
tof
Rat
ifica
tion
MCIC,M
FAI
PIFS
Bu
ild th
e ca
paci
ty o
f the
priv
ate
sect
or to
take
fu
ll ad
vant
age
of P
ICTA
Tra
de in
Ser
vice
sMed
ium-te
rmTr
ade
in S
ervi
ces
initi
ativ
es
impl
emen
ted
MCI
C An
nual
Re
port
MCI
CPI
FS
PICT
A TM
NP
Analysepo
tentialgainsfo
rKirib
atiforTMNP,
givende
velopm
entsinPAC
ERPlusvis-à-vis
deve
lopi
ng b
ilate
ral a
rran
gem
ents
with
spe
cif-
ic F
ICs
to e
nhan
ce la
bour
mob
ility
Med
ium-te
rmRe
com
men
datio
ns o
f the
An
alysisim
plem
ented/
MO
U S
igne
d
MCI
C An
nual
Re
port
MCIC/MFAI
GOK,DFAT
Im
plem
ent m
easu
res
to fa
cilit
ate
free
mov
e-m
ent o
f per
sons
am
ong
the
SIS
Med
ium-te
rmM
OU
Sig
ned
MLH
RDMLH
RD,M
FAI,
MCI
CGOK,DFAT
MTE
C
Und
erta
ke fe
asib
ility
on
the
pote
ntia
l ben
efit
of M
TEC
in a
ddre
ssin
g K
iriba
ti’s
deve
lopm
ent
need
s,especiallyinareasofT
rade
inServices
and
labo
ur m
obili
ty
Med
ium-te
rmRe
com
men
datio
ns o
f the
feasibilitycon
side
red/
implem
ented/MOUsigne
dM
CIC
annu
al r
epor
tMCIC/MFAI
GO
K
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
68TP
F20
17-202
7 69TP
F20
17-202
7
An
alys
e po
tent
ial e
xpor
t des
tinat
ions
with
the
view
ofe
nsuringcost-effe
ctivemarketa
ccess
oppo
rtun
ities
Med
ium-te
rmSu
stai
nabl
e an
d co
st
effe
ctiv
e m
arke
t acc
ess
iden
tifie
dM
CIC
repo
rts
MCI
CG
OK
Futu
re T
rade
Ag
reem
ents
Und
erta
ke c
ost b
enef
it an
alys
is fo
r al
l env
is-
aged
FTA
s or
trad
e ag
reem
ents
to e
nsur
e th
at
over
all p
oten
tial g
ains
are
the
basi
s fo
r pa
rtic
i-pa
ting
in a
ny p
oten
tial t
rade
agr
eem
ent
Med
ium-te
rmN
ew tr
ade
agre
emen
ts
info
rmed
by
outc
ome
of
cost
ben
efit
anal
ysis
.M
CIC
annu
al r
epor
tM
CIC
GO
K
Stre
ngth
enin
g Pr
ivat
e Se
ctor
En
gage
men
t
Polic
y Co
here
nce
and
Priv
ate
Sect
or
Voic
e
Strengthen
implem
entatio
nofexistingPu
blic/
Priv
ate
Part
ners
hip
Dia
logu
e be
twee
n th
e
Kirib
ati C
ham
ber
of C
omm
erce
and
Indu
stry
an
d M
CIC
to fo
ster
pol
icy
cohe
renc
e an
d fe
ed-
back
from
priv
ate
sect
or o
n po
ssib
le r
egul
ato-
ry c
onst
rain
ts
Ong
oing
Num
berofPPDialogues/
Num
ber
of a
gree
d de
ci-
sion
s/actio
ns
KCCIweb
site,M
CIC
annu
al r
epor
t MCC
I,KC
CIG
OK
N
umbe
r of
pos
ition
pap
ers
subm
itted
by
KCCI
Dia
logu
e ou
tcom
esKC
CIKC
CI
Ca
bine
t end
orse
s ne
w r
eg-
ulat
ions
Gov
ernm
ent
Gaz
ette
MCI
CG
OK
Stre
ngth
enin
g th
e Pe
rfor
man
ce o
f SO
Es
Rais
e ef
ficie
ncy
of
Stat
e ow
ned
ente
r-pr
ises
Ensu
re S
tate
Ow
ned
Ente
rpris
es a
re o
n a
mor
e co
mm
erci
al fo
otin
g th
roug
h re
view
and
effe
c-tiv
e im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e SO
E Ac
t.Med
ium-te
rm
Prof
itabi
lity
of S
OEs
SO
E an
nual
rep
orts
MFE
DG
OK
Revi
ew V
AT e
xem
ptio
n po
licy
to e
nsur
e a
leve
l playingfield,w
hileb
alan
cingp
ublicpolicy
obje
ctiv
es fo
r st
rate
gic
SOEs
to e
nhan
ce l
evel
playingfield,especiallyinsectorswhe
reth
epr
ivat
e se
ctor
can
als
o pl
ay a
sig
nific
ant r
ole
Med
ium-te
rmN
ew V
AT P
olic
y on
SO
EsM
FED
rep
orts
MFE
DG
OK
Impr
ovin
g Co
mpa
ny B
usin
ess
Regi
stra
tion
Syst
em
Compa
nyLaw
an
d Bu
sine
ss
Regi
stra
tion
Refo
rm
Revi
ew C
ompa
nies
Ord
inan
ce 1
979
and
the
Regi
stra
tion
of B
usin
ess
Nam
es A
ct 1
988.
Short-term
New
Bus
ines
s N
ames
and
Co
mpa
ny A
ct e
nact
edMCICrepo
rts,PAC
LIOAG
,MCIC
ADB,GOK
Co
nsid
er th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of a
n on
line
busine
ssregistrationsystem
,bearin
ginm
ind
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f IC
TsShort-term
Onl
ine
regi
stry
est
ablis
hed
MCI
C w
ebsi
teM
CIC
ADB,GOK
Es
tabl
ish
a si
ngle
win
dow
bus
ines
s re
gist
ratio
n sy
stem
Med
ium-te
rmSi
ngle
win
dow
reg
istr
atio
n sy
stem
in p
lace
MCI
C re
port
s M
CIC
ADB,GOK
Develop
ane-commercePolicyan
de-tran
sac-
tionlegislativefram
eworktosup
porte-filling
ba
sedon
e-com
merce,e-evide
nce
Med
ium-te
rmE-Tran
sactionsActena
cted
MCI
C re
port
s M
CIC
ADB,EIF,G
OK
E-Co
mmercePolicy
endo
rsed
by
Cabi
net
MCI
C re
port
M
CIC
UN
CTAD
Stre
ngth
enin
g Co
oper
ativ
es
Dev
elop
men
t
Coop
erat
ive
Dev
elop
men
t
Form
ulat
e a
Nat
iona
l Coo
pera
tive
Polic
y th
at
supp
orts
val
ue a
dditi
on a
nd p
rude
nt m
anag
e-m
ent o
f sec
tor
Short-term
Coop
erat
ive
Polic
y en
dors
ed b
y Ca
bine
tM
CIC
repo
rt
MCI
CG
OK
Re
view
and
effe
ctiv
ely
enfo
rce
coop
erat
ive
rela
ted
legi
slat
ions
to e
nhan
ce e
ffect
ive
gove
r-na
nce
of th
e se
ctor
Short-term
New
Coo
pera
tive
Act
enac
ted
MCI
C re
port
M
CIC
GO
K
Im
plem
ent f
inan
cial
lite
racy
pro
gram
mes
w
hich
allo
w c
oope
rativ
es to
be
tran
spar
ent
and
prud
ent t
hus
ensu
ring
sust
aina
bilit
yMed
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
fina
ncia
l lite
r-ac
y pr
ogra
mm
es im
ple-
men
ted
MCI
C re
port
M
CIC
GO
K
Pr
omot
e th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f coo
pera
tives
in
key
prod
uctiv
e se
ctor
like
fish
erie
s an
d ot
her
serv
ice
orie
nted
sec
tor
indu
strie
s
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
70TP
F20
17-202
7 71TP
F20
17-202
7
Impl
emen
t aw
aren
ess
prog
ram
mes
to e
ncou
r-ag
e co
oper
ativ
es to
take
adv
anta
ge o
f var
ious
go
vern
men
t inc
entiv
es to
incr
ease
cap
acity
to
add
valu
e
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
aw
aren
ess
prog
ram
mes
des
igne
d an
d im
plem
ente
dM
CIC
repo
rtM
CIC
GO
K
Investmen
tbyi-K
iri-
bati
at h
ome
Fost
erin
g D
omes
tic
Inve
stm
ent
Des
ign
and
impl
emen
t fin
anci
al in
clus
ion
pro-
gram
mes
in li
ne w
ith b
est p
ract
ices
from
oth
er
Paci
fic Is
land
Sta
tes
Med
ium-te
rmIn
crea
se in
num
ber
of r
eg-
iste
red
busi
ness
esM
CIC
repo
rts
MCI
CAD
B-PSDI,UNCD
F,
DFAT,M
FAT
Enac
t fin
anci
al s
ecto
r le
gisl
atio
n an
d es
tabl
ish
over
sigh
t ins
titut
iona
l fra
mew
ork
con
side
ring
Kirib
ati’s
com
mitm
ents
und
er r
egio
nal t
rade
ag
reem
ents
Med
ium-te
rmFi
nanc
ial
Act i
n pl
ace
PACLI
MFE
DAD
B,M
FAT,DFAT
Re
view
SM
Es p
olic
y an
d re
gula
tory
fram
ewor
k to
war
ds th
e de
velo
pmen
t of b
usin
ess
serv
ices
Med
ium-te
rmSM
E Po
licy
deve
lope
dSM
E Po
licy
MCIC,DBK
,MFED
GOK,Governm
ento
fIndia,UNDP
Harmon
ise,develop
and
implem
entspe
cific
finan
cing
sch
eme
for
SMEs
in o
rder
to im
prov
e ac
cess
to fi
nanc
e Med
ium-te
rmIm
prov
ed a
cces
s to
cre
dit
DBK
rep
orts,village
bank
rep
orts
MCI
CAD
B,In
dia,Taiwan
,D
FAT
Impl
emen
t bus
ines
s aw
aren
ess
prog
ram
mes
on
the
ben
efits
of r
egis
terin
g bu
sine
sses
to
faci
litat
e gr
adua
tion
from
info
rmal
to fo
rmal
sectors,th
ereb
ywiden
ingtaxan
drevenu
eba
se a
s w
ell a
s co
vera
ge o
f ent
erpr
ises
Med
ium-te
rmIn
crea
se in
num
ber
of r
eg-
iste
red
busi
ness
esM
CIC
repo
rts
MCI
CGOK,UNDP
Enco
urag
ing
Inw
ard
Inve
stm
ent t
o Kirib
ati:ASimpler,
QuickerSystem
Attr
actin
g Fo
reig
n D
irect
Inve
stm
ent
Form
ulat
e an
d im
plem
ent i
nves
tmen
t Pol
icy
fram
ewor
k in
line
with
KV2
0 Short-term
Inve
stm
ent p
olic
y fr
ame-
wor
k en
dors
ed b
y Ca
bine
tM
CIC
web
site
MCI
CEIF,PT&
I,AD
B,W
orld
Bank
Re
view
the
Fore
ign
inve
stm
ent A
ct in
line
with
th
e In
vest
men
t Pol
icy
Fram
ewor
kMed
ium-te
rmN
ew in
vest
men
t Act
ena
ct-
ed
MCI
C w
ebsi
teOAG
,MCIC
EIF
Stre
ngth
en th
e in
vest
men
t Coo
rdin
atio
n
mec
hani
sm a
cros
s re
leva
nt g
over
nmen
t min-
istries,and
dep
artm
entsatn
ationa
lleveland
th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
as
wel
l as
reg
iona
l ins
titu-
tions
to id
entif
y an
d de
velo
p in
vest
men
t pla
n in
line
with
KV2
0
Short-term
Inve
stm
ent p
lan
deve
l-op
ed
MCI
C re
port
s M
CIC
GOK,PT&
I
In
crea
se fu
ndin
g an
d st
reng
then
the
cap
acity
w
ithin
gov
ernm
ent t
o en
hanc
e in
vest
men
t pr
omot
ion
Med
ium-te
rmIn
crea
se in
num
ber
of n
ew
inve
stm
ent a
pplic
atio
nsM
CIC
repo
rts
OAG
,MCIC
GOK,PT&
I,IPA,ITC,
UN
CTAD
Impl
emen
t Inv
estm
ent p
rom
otio
n pr
o-gram
mesth
roughoverseasm
ission
s,regiona
lin
vest
men
t pro
mot
ion
agen
cies
and
oth
er
onlin
e pr
omot
ion
initi
ativ
es
Med
ium-te
rmIn
crea
se in
num
ber
of n
ew
inve
stm
ent a
pplic
atio
nsM
CIC
repo
rts
MCI
CGOK,PT&
I,IPA,ITC,
UN
CTAD
At th
e Bo
rder
: Fa
cilit
atin
g Tr
ade
Impr
ovin
g Cu
stom
s Pr
oced
ures
Dev
elop
a m
echa
nism
to e
nsur
e th
at a
ll au
thor
ities
and
age
ncie
s in
volv
ed in
bor
der
and
othe
r im
port
and
exp
ort
cont
rol p
oint
s
coop
erat
e an
d co
ordi
nate
in o
rder
to fa
cilit
ate
trad
e;
Short-term
Sing
le w
indo
w s
yste
m
adop
ted
MO
J rep
orts
M
OJ
UNCT
AD,TRA
DEC
OM
Im
plem
ent
Kirib
ati’s
cus
tom
s pr
oced
ures
that
ar
e al
igne
d to
the
Trad
e Fa
cilit
atio
n Ag
reem
ent
(TFA
)Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
TFA
rel
ated
m
easu
res
cons
ider
ed a
nd
impl
emen
ted
MO
J rep
orts
M
OJ
ITC,W
orldBan
k,
UN
CTAD
Impl
emen
t pol
icy
mea
sure
s to
sup
port
the
effe
ctiv
e im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e co
untr
y’s o
bli-
gatio
ns r
elat
ed to
cus
tom
s pr
oced
ures
in
the
regi
onal
trad
e ag
reem
ents
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r an
d ty
pe o
f pol
icy
mea
sure
s im
plem
ente
dM
OJ r
epor
ts
MO
JOCO
,DFAT,ITC,
UN
CTAD
Ad
opt t
rade
faci
litat
ion
syst
ems
requ
ired
by
impo
rtin
g Co
untr
ies
(i.e.
EU
TRA
CES
Syst
em )
Med
ium-te
rmTr
ade
faci
litat
ion
syst
em
alig
ned
to E
U T
RACE
S Sy
stem
MFM
RD r
epor
ts
MFM
RDEU
,STD
F
Dom
estic
and
In
tern
atio
nal
Ship
ping
Impr
oved
Co
nnec
tivity
and
Ac
cess
ibili
ty o
f Sh
ippi
ng S
ervi
ces
Cont
inue
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
CPSC
ag
reem
ent w
ith th
e vi
ew to
impr
ove
ship
ping
se
rvic
es in
the
regi
on w
hile
ass
essi
ng th
eir
long
term
sus
tain
abili
ty a
nd im
pact
on
frei
ght
Ong
oing
Impr
oved
num
ber
of m
er-
chan
t Shi
ppin
g Vo
yage
sKP
A re
cord
s M
ICTT
DGOK,SPC
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
72TP
F20
17-202
7 73TP
F20
17-202
7
D
evel
op a
legi
slat
ive
fram
ewor
k to
rei
nfor
ce
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
shi
ppin
g sc
hedu
les
Short-term
Regu
lato
ry F
ram
ewor
k en
acte
dM
ICTT
D r
ecor
dsM
ICTT
DAD
B
Ad
opt t
he P
PP fr
amew
ork
in d
evel
opin
g th
e do
mes
tic s
hipp
ing
indu
stry
as
reco
mm
ende
d in
the
Nat
iona
l Mar
itim
e Tr
ansp
ort P
olic
yMed
ium-te
rmEq
uity
in th
e di
strib
utio
n of
shi
ppin
g se
rvic
esM
ICTT
D r
ecor
dsM
ICTT
DG
OK
Implem
entP
olicymeasuresinclud
ingslipway,
dry
dock
s an
d ot
her
port
faci
litie
s on
the
oute
r Is
land
s th
at w
ould
sup
port
the
oper
atio
n of
bi
gger
ves
sels
ser
vici
ng th
e ou
ter
Isla
nds
Med
ium-te
rmIm
prov
ed p
ort f
acili
ties
on
the
Out
er Is
land
sM
ICTT
D r
ecor
dsM
ICTT
DAD
B,W
orldBan
k,
Japa
n,DTA
F
Im
plem
ent m
easu
res
to im
prov
e th
e sh
ippi
ng
conn
ectiv
ity to
the
Isle
ts o
n th
e ou
ter
Isla
nds
Med
ium-te
rmIm
prov
ed C
onne
ctiv
ityM
ICTT
D r
ecor
dsM
ICTT
DG
OK
Impl
emen
t mea
sure
s to
impr
ove
tran
spar
ency
an
d ef
ficie
ncy
in th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e fr
eigh
t lev
y w
ith th
e vi
ew o
f mee
ting
the
over-
all i
nten
ded
polic
y ob
ject
ive
Med
ium-te
rmIn
crea
se in
the
num
ber
of
frei
ght l
evy
bene
ficia
ries
per
year
MFE
D r
ecor
dsM
FED
ADB,GOK
Air
Tran
spor
t
Impr
oved
Co
nnec
tivity
and
Ac
cess
ibili
ty o
f Air
Tran
spor
t Ser
vice
s
Incr
ease
frei
ght a
nd a
ir pa
ssen
ger
capa
city
th
roug
h st
rate
gic
Air
Serv
ice
Agre
emen
ts w
ith
neig
hbou
ring
coun
trie
s an
d ai
rline
s on
the
basi
s of
effi
cien
cy a
nd s
usta
inab
ility
of t
he a
ir se
rvic
es
Med
ium-te
rmEf
ficie
ncy
and
relia
bilit
y of
in
tern
atio
nal
air
serv
ices
M
ICTT
D r
ecor
ds
MICTTD,AKL
GO
K
Im
provethecapa
cityofd
omesticflights,
incl
udin
g op
tions
for
incr
easi
ng th
e ca
paci
ty o
f Ai
r Ki
ribat
i Med
ium-te
rmEf
ficie
ncy
and
relia
bilit
y of
in
tern
atio
nal o
f dom
estic
ai
r se
rvic
es
MIC
TTD
rec
ords
MIC
TTD
GO
K
D
evel
op a
sto
rage
war
ehou
se fa
cilit
y at
the
airp
ort t
o fa
cilit
ate
trad
e th
roug
h Ai
r Fr
eigh
t Se
rvic
esMed
ium-te
rmIm
prov
ed a
irpor
t fac
ilitie
sM
ICTT
D r
ecor
ds
MICTTD,AKL
GO
K
ICTE-Com
merce
and
Trad
e
Prom
otetheuseofe-Com
mercebybu
sine
ss
commun
ity,takingintocon
side
ratio
ntheir
lowlevelofa
waren
ess,lowlevelofa
ccessan
dus
age
of IC
Ts
Med
ium-te
rmPe
rcep
tion
Surv
eyM
CIC
repo
rts
MCI
CG
OK
Im
plem
ent m
easu
res
to im
prov
e th
e in
tern
et
and
conn
ectiv
ity o
n th
e ou
ter
isla
nds
Med
ium-te
rm%
of p
enet
ratio
n M
ICTT
D r
epor
ts
MIC
TTD
GO
K
Develop
and
effe
ctivelyim
plem
enta
ne-Co
m-
mer
ce p
olic
y an
d re
gula
tory
fram
ewor
kM
edium-te
rmE-commercePolicy
endo
rsed
by
Cabi
net
MCI
C re
port
sM
CIC
GO
K
Com
petit
ion
and
Cons
umer
Pr
otec
tion
Stre
ngth
enin
g Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gim
e an
d Co
nsum
er
Prot
ectio
n
Revi
ew p
rice
cont
rol r
egim
e w
ith a
vie
w to
en
surin
g co
nsis
tenc
y w
ith tr
ade
polic
y ob
jec-
tives
whi
le m
eetin
g in
tend
ed p
ublic
pol
icy
obje
ctiv
es
Short-term
Num
berofprice-con-
trol
led
prod
ucts
inlin
e w
ith
the
Trad
e Po
licy
obje
ctiv
esM
CIC
reco
rds
MCI
CG
OK
Im
plem
ent p
olic
y m
easu
res
to s
tren
gthe
n th
e im
plem
enta
tion
and
mon
itorin
g of
Pric
e O
rder
Short-term
Redu
ced
num
ber
of c
on-
sum
er c
ompl
aint
s M
CIC
repo
rts
MCI
CG
OK
Co
nsid
er a
dopt
ion
of a
com
preh
ensi
ve c
ompe
-tit
ion
polic
y fr
amew
ork
Short-term
Com
petit
ion
asse
ssm
ent
unde
rtak
en a
nd r
epor
t en
dors
ed b
y Ca
bine
tM
CIC
web
site
MCI
CG
OK
Re
view
and
str
engt
hen
con
sum
er p
rote
ctio
n en
forc
emen
t leg
isla
tive
fram
ewor
k in
line
with
theNationa
lQua
lityPo
licy(2017-2023)
Short-term
New
Con
sum
er P
rote
ctio
n Ac
t ena
cted
MCI
C w
ebsi
teO
AGG
OK
Im
plem
ent c
onsu
mer
pro
tect
ion
and
awar
e-ne
ss p
rogr
amm
es f
or e
ffect
ive
impl
emen
ta-
tion
of le
gisl
atio
nShort-term
Cons
umer
Per
cept
ion
Surv
ey r
epor
tsM
CIC
web
site
MCI
CG
OK
Stan
dard
s an
dQua
lity
Infr
astr
uctu
re
Stre
ngth
enin
g
Nationa
lQua
lity
Infr
astr
uctu
re
Impl
emen
t pol
icy
mea
sure
s to
str
engt
hen
Nationa
lQua
lityInfrastructureinth
efollow-
ing
aspe
cts
in li
ne w
ith r
ecom
men
datio
ns
inth
eNationa
lQua
lityPo
licy(2017-2023):
Stan
dardsan
dQua
lityProm
otion;Regulatory
Fram
ework,Testin
gLabo
ratorie
s;Certification;
Accred
itatio
n,M
etrology,Fishe
riesan
dAq
uacultu
re,Foo
dSafety;A
gricultureand
En
vironm
ent;Tourismand
Culture;Edu
catio
nan
d H
uman
Dev
elop
men
t
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r an
d ty
pe o
f pol
icy
mea
sure
s im
plem
ente
d in
theNationa
lQua
lityPo
licy
Sect
or a
nnua
l repo
rts,M
FMRD
,CA
,MCICweb
site
MCI
CSPC,M
FAT,DFAT,EU,
SDFT,EIF,W
HO
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
74TP
F20
17-202
7 75TP
F20
17-202
7
Inte
llect
ual P
rope
rty
Righ
ts
Stre
ngth
enin
g
Nat
iona
l Int
elle
ctua
l Pr
oper
ty R
egim
e
Impl
emen
t pol
icy
mea
sure
s w
ith v
iew
to
stre
ngth
en N
atio
nal I
ntel
lect
ual P
rope
rty
Regi
me
in th
e fo
llow
ing
aspe
cts
as r
ecom
-m
ende
d in
the
Nat
iona
l Int
elle
ctua
l Pro
pert
y Strategy(2017-2023):Co
pyrig
ht;Trade
marks;
Indu
stria
ldesigns;Paten
ts;G
eograp
hicalind
i-catio
ns;Traditio
nalKno
wledgean
dCu
ltural
Expression
s;Cap
acityBuildingofIP-related
institu
tions;
Med
ium-te
rm
Num
ber
and
type
of p
olic
y measuresim
plem
ented;
Nat
iona
l ICH
inve
ntor
ies
impl
emen
ted
Annu
al s
ecto
r repo
rts,M
CICweb
-si
te a
nd c
ultu
ral
map
ping
rep
orts
MCIC,M
IA,M
FAI,
KIAN
GO,KCC
IWIPO,G
OK,UNESCO
Impr
ovin
g la
nd u
se
and
plan
ning
to
supp
ort p
rivat
e se
c-to
r de
velo
pmen
t
Revi
ew g
ener
al la
nd u
se p
lan
for
gove
rn-
men
t-owne
dland
Short-term
Gen
eral
land
use
pla
n in
pl
ace
MELAD
ann
ual
repo
rt
MELAD
GIZ/SPC
,EU
U
nder
take
add
ition
al in
vest
men
t to
incr
ease
la
nd a
rea
for
com
mer
cial
pur
pose
s th
roug
h la
nd r
ecla
mat
ion
Med
ium-te
rmSi
ze o
f new
rec
laim
ed la
ndMELAD
ann
ual
repo
rt
MELAD
MFA
T
St
ream
line
proc
edur
es to
sta
ndar
dise
land
-ow
ners
’ con
sent
for
obta
inin
g la
nd fo
r pu
blic
us
e an
d pr
ivat
e se
ctor
dev
elop
men
t Short-term
Nat
ive
land
ord
inan
ce
amen
ded
and
enac
ted.
MELAD
ann
ual
repo
rt
MELAD
GOK,DTA
F,M
FAT
Agric
ultu
re a
nd
Supp
ly C
apac
ity
Stre
ngth
enin
g se
ctor
al li
nkag
es
thro
ugh
agric
ultu
re
Dev
elop
and
effe
ctiv
ely
impl
emen
t the
coc
onut
se
ctor
dev
elop
men
t str
ateg
y Med
ium-te
rm
Stra
tegy
end
orse
d by
Ca
bine
t M
CIC
repo
rt
MCI
CSPC,IB
SAFacility
D
evel
op a
n Ag
ricul
tura
l pol
icy
with
em
phas
is
onincreasingsup
plycapa
city,agribusiness
and
com
mer
cial
pro
duct
ion
Med
ium-te
rmSt
rate
gy e
ndor
sed
by
Cabi
net
MELAD
rep
ort
MELAD
FAO,IFAD
Prom
ote
agrib
usin
ess
and
com
mer
cial
isat
ion
ofagriculture,includingprodu
ctionoflocal
fruits,livestockand
vegetab
leand
add
ressing
tran
sportatio
nan
dlogistics,m
arketin
getc.
Med
ium-te
rmIn
crea
se in
dom
estic
trad
e fo
r lo
cal p
rodu
ceM
CIC
stat
istic
sMELAD
FAO,IFAD
Revi
ew te
chni
cal c
oope
ratio
n ag
reem
ents
on
agr
icul
ture
with
dev
elop
men
t par
tner
s to
en
sure
gre
ater
focu
s on
out
er Is
land
s w
ith
pote
ntia
l for
agr
icul
tura
l pro
duct
ion
Med
ium-te
rm
Num
ber
of n
ew te
chni
cal
prog
ram
mes
est
ablis
hed
and
impl
emen
ted
on o
uter
is
land
s
MELAD
rep
ort
MELAD
Taiwan
,FAO
,SPC
Fish
erie
s an
d Su
pply
Ca
paci
ty
Max
imis
ing
ret
urns
fr
om s
usta
inab
le
fishe
ries
and
mar
ine
reso
urce
s
Implem
entN
ationa
lFishe
riesPo
licies(2016-
2025
) with
an
emph
asis
on
ensu
ring
food
security,safetysustainab
lelivelihoo
d;long-
term
con
serv
atio
n an
d st
reng
then
ing
of g
over-
nanc
e in
the
sect
or
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r an
d ty
pe o
f pol
icy
mea
sure
s im
plem
ente
dM
FMRD
rep
ort
MFM
RDG
OK
Wor
k w
ith o
uter
isla
nds
in p
rom
otin
g in
vest-
men
t in
inte
grat
ed c
atch
ing
and
proc
essi
ng
and
faci
litat
ing
expo
rts
of v
alue
add
ed fi
sher-
ies
prod
ucts
Short-term
Incr
ease
in n
umbe
r of
in
vest
men
ts in
the
sect
or
on th
e ou
ter
Isla
nds
MFM
RD,M
IA,
reco
rds
MFM
RDGOK,PT&
I
Implem
entn
on-d
iscrim
inatoryinvestmen
tPo
licy
ince
ntiv
es t
o at
trac
t inv
esto
rs i
n th
e fis
herie
s s
ecto
r an
d m
arin
e re
sour
ces
like
sola
r Sa
lt
Shor
t Ter
m
type
of i
ncen
tives
impl
e-m
ente
dM
CIC
Repo
rt
MCIC,MFED
GO
K
Im
plem
ent p
olic
y m
easu
res
to s
uppo
rt th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f tra
nshi
pmen
t hub
in B
etio
an
d Ki
ritim
ati
Med
ium-te
rmTr
ansh
ipm
ent h
ub e
stab
-lis
hed
MFM
RD r
epor
t M
FMRD
WorldBan
k,Japa
n,
EIF,DFAT,M
FAT,ADB
D
evel
op a
irpor
t fac
ilitie
s to
sup
port
fish
ex
port
sMed
ium-te
rmIm
prov
emen
t in
airp
ort
faci
litie
sM
ICTT
D r
ecor
ds
MIC
TTD
WorldBan
k,Japa
n,
EIF,DFAT,M
FAT,ADB
In
vest
in fi
shin
g ve
ssel
s in
ord
er to
mee
t SP
S re
gula
tions
for
expo
rt m
arke
ts li
ke E
UMed
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
new
ves
sels
MFM
RD r
ecor
ds
MFM
RDG
OK
Im
plem
ent p
olic
y m
easu
res
to s
uppo
rt th
e de
velo
pmen
t of a
quac
ultu
reShort-term
Num
ber
of a
quac
ultu
re
proj
ects
impl
emen
ted
MFM
RD r
ecor
ds
MFM
RDG
OK
Dev
elop
ing
Sust
aina
ble
Tour
ism
Impr
ovin
g re
venu
e
thro
ugh
sust
aina
ble
tour
ism
Incr
ease
aw
aren
ess
of K
iriba
ti an
d th
e yi
eld
for
tour
ism
pro
duct
sMed
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
new
tour
ism
pr
oduc
ts im
plem
ente
d M
ICTT
D r
ecor
ds
MIC
TTD
PT&
I
Impl
emen
t mea
sure
s to
sup
port
the
deve
l-op
men
t of
the
cultu
ral t
ouris
m o
n th
e ou
ter
Isla
nds
in s
uppo
rt o
f Kiri
bati
visi
on fo
r 20
yea
rs
(KV2
0);
Med
ium-te
rm
Tour
ism
cul
tura
l pro
ject
s im
plem
ented,Nationa
lCu
ltura
l Pla
n en
dors
ed
and
impl
emen
ted
MICTTDrecords/
MIA
ann
ual r
epor
ts
MICTTD/M
IAG
OK
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
76TP
F20
17-202
7 77TP
F20
17-202
7
Bu
ild to
uris
m a
nd h
ospi
talit
y hu
man
res
ourc
e ca
paci
ty w
ithin
Kiri
bati
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
trai
ned
grad
-ua
tes
MLH
RDrep
orts
MLH
RDMFAT,DFAT
Su
ppor
t inv
estm
ent i
n hi
gh y
ield
tour
ism
pro
d-uc
tsMed
ium-te
rmN
ew to
uris
m p
roje
ct
impl
emen
ted
MIC
TTD
rec
ords
M
ICTT
DSP
TO
Im
prov
e in
fras
truc
ture
con
nect
ivity
and
acc
ess
abili
ty to
sup
port
tour
ism
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
flig
ht s
ched
ules
to
the
oute
r Is
land
sM
ICTT
D r
ecor
ds
MIC
TTD
SPTO
Im
prov
e ac
cess
to u
tility
and
soc
ial i
nfra
stru
c-tu
re to
sup
port
tour
ism
dev
elop
men
t Med
ium-te
rmIm
prov
ed a
cces
s to
wat
er
and
ener
gy b
y in
dust
ry
play
ers
MIS
E re
cord
s M
ISE
GEF
Im
plem
ent i
nves
tmen
t pol
icy
ince
ntiv
es to
fo
ster
bus
ines
s de
velo
pmen
t in
the
tour
ism
se
ctor
Med
ium-te
rmTy
pe a
nd n
umbe
r of
pol
icy
ince
ntiv
es im
plem
ente
dM
ICTT
D r
ecor
ds
MICTTD/M
FAI
SPTO
Reviewwhe
reKNTO
sitswith
ingovernm
ent
set-u
ptoensureitcanmoste
ffectively
coor
dina
te a
nd im
plem
ent t
ouris
m p
olic
ies
and
com
pete
for
suffi
cien
t res
ourc
es fr
om
gove
rnm
ent
Med
ium-te
rmTo
uris
m in
stitu
tiona
l fr
amew
ork
stre
ngth
ened
M
ICTT
D r
ecor
ds
MIC
TTD
GO
K
D
evel
op a
Tou
rism
legi
slat
ion
to r
egul
ate
the
sect
or
Med
ium-te
rmTo
uris
m le
gisl
atio
n en
act-
ed.
MIC
TTD
rec
ords
OAG
,MICTTD
SPTO
,
Labo
urM
obilityand
D
ecen
t Em
ploy
men
t
Incr
easi
ng d
omes-
tic a
nd o
vers
eas
dece
nt e
mpl
oym
ent
Implem
entN
ationa
lLab
ourMigratio
nPo
licy
whi
ch e
mph
asis
es th
e pr
omot
ion
of d
ecen
t em
ploy
men
t opp
ortu
nitie
s fo
r do
mes
tic a
nd
overseasemploymen
t,includ
ingen
hancing
qual
ity a
nd a
dequ
ate
labo
ur s
uppl
y th
roug
h tr
aini
ng in
stitu
tes
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
new
ove
rsea
s la
bour
mar
kets
MEH
Rweb
site,sec-
tor
repo
rts
MEH
RG
OK
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
New
em
ploy
ers
MFAI/M
LHRD
ILO
Med
ium-te
rmRe
duct
ion
in u
nem
ploy-
men
t rat
e
MFM
RDD
FAT
Med
ium-te
rmIn
crea
se in
num
ber
of
over
seas
wor
kers
PS
OM
FAT
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
Med
ium-te
rmIn
crea
sed
reco
gniti
on o
f ov
erse
as q
ualif
icat
ions
MOE,M
CIC
FFA
St
reng
then
the
over
all g
over
nanc
e sy
stem
in
the
recr
uitm
ent o
f the
ove
rsea
s w
orke
rs
Med
ium-te
rmFe
edba
ck fr
om w
orke
rsM
EHR
Repo
rts
MEH
RG
OK
Im
plem
ent a
n E
duca
tion
Polic
y w
ith m
easu
res
that
em
phas
es o
n im
prov
emen
t of
Engl
ish
Literacyata
lllevels
Med
ium-te
rmIm
prov
ed E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge
liter
acy
MO
E re
port
s M
CIC
SPC
Seab
ed M
iner
als
Max
imis
ing
eco-
nom
ic r
etur
ns fr
om
seab
ed m
iner
als
Impl
emen
t Sea
bed
Min
eral
s Po
licy
and
legi
sla-
tive
fram
ewor
k w
ith v
iew
to m
axim
ise
reve
nue
from
the
sect
or
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r an
d ty
pe o
f pol
icy
mea
sure
s im
plem
ente
d
MFM
RDweb
site,
MFM
RD p
rogr
ess
repo
rt
MFM
RD,M
FED,
MELAD
,MCIC,
MFA
I
GOK,SPC
,Co
mm
onw
ealth
Se
cret
aria
t
Expl
ore
and
expl
oit s
take
in th
e Cl
ario
n Cl
ippe
rton
Fra
ctur
e Zo
ne w
hile
max
imis
ing
oppo
rtun
ities
for
capa
city
bui
ldin
g an
d ac
cess
to
ben
efit
shar
ing
from
the
area
Long-te
rmN
umbe
r of
exp
lora
tion
trip
sEx
plor
atio
n re
port
sM
FMRD
GOK,ISA,PPP
(B
ilate
ral P
artn
ers)
Ex
ploi
tatio
n ph
ase
Expl
oita
tion
repo
rts
MFM
RD
Dom
estic
Sup
ply
chai
n
Stre
ngth
enin
g do
mes
tic s
uppl
y ch
ains
Esta
blis
h a
n op
en in
tegr
ated
mar
ket f
or lo
cal
prod
uce
to e
nhan
ce d
omes
tic tr
ade
Med
ium-te
rmO
pen
inte
grat
ed m
arke
t es
tabl
ishe
dMCIC,rep
orts/M
IA
repo
rts
MCIC/MIA
GOK,UNDP
Supp
ortinvestm
entin,fo
od,fruitprocessing
an
d st
orag
e fa
cilit
ies
like
fish
cent
res
or ic
e m
akin
g m
achi
nes
to r
educ
e po
st h
arve
st lo
ssMed
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r an
d ty
pe o
f sto
r-ag
e fa
cilit
ies
acqu
ired
MELAD
,MFM
RD
repo
rts
MFM
RDUNDP,M
FAT,DFAT
Stre
ngth
en th
e ca
paci
ty o
f bus
ines
s as
soci
a-tio
ns,coo
perativesand
theirne
tworksonpro-
duction,sup
plychainman
agem
ent,an
dmar-
ketin
g to
enh
ance
pro
duce
r m
arke
t lin
kage
s
Med
ium-te
rm
Num
ber
and
type
of
Capa
city
bui
ldin
g pr
o-gram
mesim
plem
ented,
num
ber
of p
rodu
cers
traine
d,increasein
dom
estic
trad
e
MELAD
,MFM
RD,
MCIC/MIArep
orts
MCI
C re
port
s GOK,UNDP
Impl
emen
t aw
aren
ess
prog
ram
mes
to
enco
urag
e pr
oduc
ers
to ta
ke a
dvan
tage
of t
he
exis
ting
gove
rnm
ent e
stab
lishe
d in
cent
ives
to
prom
ote
dom
estic
trad
e
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r an
d ty
pe o
f aw
aren
ess
prog
ram
mes
im
plem
ente
dSe
ctor
rep
orts
MCI
C re
port
s GOK,UNDP
78TP
F20
17-202
7
Im
plem
ent P
olic
y m
easu
res
to im
prov
e inter-Island
tran
sporta
ndIC
TCo
nnectivity
Med
ium-te
rmIm
prov
ed in
tern
et c
onne
c-tivity;Increaseinnum
ber
of s
hipp
ing
voya
ges
MIC
ITD
rep
orts
MIC
TTD
ADB,W
orldBan
k
TPF
Impl
emen
tatio
n ,Institu
tiona
lFr
amew
ork
and
Aid
for
trad
e
Inst
itutio
nal
Fram
ewor
k an
d Ai
d fo
r Tr
ade
Strengthen
existingm
ulti-stakeh
olde
rconsul-
tativ
e m
echa
nism
s to
ens
ure
trad
e co
ncer
ns
are
prop
erly
mai
nstr
eam
ed b
y go
vern
men
t for
go
od tr
ade
deve
lopm
ent o
utco
mes
Med
ium-te
rmTrad
erelatedsub-commit-
tee
esta
blis
hed
NTA
Cminutes,TOR
forne
wsub
-com
-m
ittee
s M
CIC
GO
K
Ex
plor
e an
d co
nsid
er e
stab
lishm
ent o
f a T
rade
Ac
t to
supp
ort s
usta
inab
ility
of k
ey in
stitu
tions
suchasNTA
C,etc.
Med
ium-te
rmTr
ade
Act e
nact
edM
CIC
web
site
OAG
,MCIC
GO
K
Stre
ngth
en c
olla
bora
tion
and
part
ners
hips
w
ith in
tern
atio
nal o
rgan
isat
ions
and
dev
el-
opm
ent p
artn
ers
to m
axim
ise
bene
fits
of A
FT
oppo
rtun
ities
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
par
tner
ship
s
esta
blis
hed
MCI
C re
port
sM
CIC
GO
K
En
hanc
e ca
paci
ty o
f rel
evan
t sta
keho
lder
s on
de
velo
pmen
t of t
echn
ical
Aid
for
Trad
e pr
o-po
sals
Med
ium-te
rmN
umbe
r of
Aid
for
Trad
e pr
ojec
t pro
posa
ls d
evel-
oped
and
fund
ed
MCI
C re
port
s MCIC,MFED
GO
K
M
ains
trea
m A
id fo
r Tr
ade
in b
ilate
ral d
onor
pa
rtne
rshi
p ar
rang
emen
ts a
nd in
the
deve
lop-
men
t par
tner
foru
ms
and
dial
ogue
sMed
ium-te
rm
Aid
for
Trad
e m
ain-
stre
amed
in v
ario
us b
ilat-
eral
dev
elop
men
t par
tner
s’ ar
rang
emen
t fra
mew
orks
an
d m
eetin
g ou
tcom
es
MCI
C re
port
s MCIC/MFAI
GOK,Develop
men
tPa
rtne
rs
Tim
e Fr
ame
Med
ium
-Ter
m -6
Ye
ars
-Lon
g-Te
rm
over
6 Y
ears
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsM
eans
of
Veri
ficat
ion
Lead
Age
ncy
Pote
ntia
l Sou
rce
of
Fund
ing
80 TPF 2017-2027