King 21Feb2017 Using Systems Thinking to...2. Dynamic Hypothesis Step 1: Systems Mapping •Created...
Transcript of King 21Feb2017 Using Systems Thinking to...2. Dynamic Hypothesis Step 1: Systems Mapping •Created...
Using systems thinking to understand food insecurity across fisheries and
agricultural systems in coastal communities within Southeast Asia
Research ObjectiveAssess the future vulnerability of island coastal communities who are reliant on
fisheries and agriculture to achieve a food secure future, by understanding the
ecosystem and socio-economic system interactions and dynamics
Food security or food insecurity?“Food security exists when all people at all times have physical or economic access to
sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet all their dietary needs and food preferences for
an active and healthy life” (FAO 2006)
Five aspects of food securityFive aspects of food security:
1. Availability: enough food to feed people2. Access: ability of people to physically obtain and
economically procure food 3. Utilisation: use of food for body’s nutrition and the
utility (pleasure) obtained from food4. Stability: people feel certain about where their next
meal is coming from5. Suitability: determining one’s quality of life, culturally
acceptable and preferences
Why systems thinking as an approach?
Source: Ingram (2011) A Food system approach to researching food security and its interactions with global environmental change
Why systems thinking as an approach?• Food security is a complex or wicked problem. • Cannot be addressed in isolation – part of a system• Practitioners do not have a singular framework to address food security
• Food security is intrinsically linked to livelihoods• Current research focuses on:
• global or regional levels – very little on local scales and impacts• agricultural or fisheries treated as separate systems • singular aspect focus with food systems
• Enables an exploration of food insecurity at the local level
The El Nido Case Study
El Nido Site
Research Approach & Results
1. Problem Articulation
Source: Sterman (2006), Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a complex world
Food Insecurity Drivers• Drivers:
• Increasing population brought about by increasing tourism
• Increasing demand on resources• Loss of agricultural land due to development• Habitat degradation• Resource depletion• Climate related incidence
2. Dynamic Hypothesis
Source: Sterman (2006), Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a complex world
2. Dynamic Hypothesis
Step 1: Systems Mapping
•Conducted Community Participatory Workshops (CPWs)
Community Participatory Workshops
18 barangays 54 CPWs 796 participants
2. Dynamic HypothesisStep 1: Systems Mapping• Created mental models or rich pictures of the problem using SESAMME tool • Resources• Resource use activities• Pressures influencing the resources and activities• The past, expected future and desired future trends• Interactions between these activities, resources and
pressures, and • Decisions that could be taken to address problematic
trends in these activities, resources or pressures
SESAMME
Resources
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Wild Chicken Wild Boar
Freshwater fish Whale Shark (butanding)
Lake Hot springs
Minerals (Manganese) Saging Coffee
Jelly Fish Forest over limestone
Planted trees Limestone cliffs
Creek Buri
Kugon Rattan Guano
Tamilok Irrigation Pandan
Latian (kaingin produce) Cashews
Shark Dolphin
Manta Rays Water system (stream)
Upland Rice (kaingin rice) Abalone
Octopus (Pugita) Sea Urchin River turtle
Caves (Pasimbahan) Rivers
Balansasayaw (birds nest) Manlet (giant clam)
Seahorse Waterfall
Sand and gravel Lobster
Honey / honey bees Squid
Prawns / shrimps Dugong
Beach (Lapus-lapus) Timber
Seaweed (Lato) Non Timber (rattan, buho, yantok)
Crabs (Alimasag) Wildlife Poultry
Piggery Rice
Sea Cucumber (Balatan) Turtle (Pawikan)
Nipa / Pawid Fruit
Vegetables Coral Crops
Shells / Shellfish Seagrass Livestock
Natural Water source Fish
Mangrove Coconut Palm
Forest
Resources: FGD Round One
% of barangays
Nbr of barangays who identified resources
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Fish resources
Forest over limestone
Limestone cliffs
Water system (stream)
Balansasayaw (birds
Caves (Pasimbahan)
Watershed
Balansasayaw (swfits)
Cashews
Rivers
Sand and gravel
Upland Rice (kaingin
Molluscs
Seaweed (Lato)
Coral
Timber
Nipa / Pawid
Livestock
Crops
Fruit
Rice
Fish
Shells / Shellfish
Crustaceans
Other important marine
Mangrove
Seagrass
Beach (Lapus-lapus)
Man-made water source
Non Timber (rattan,
Coconut Palm
Wildlife
Poultry
Vegetables
Forest
Natural Water source
Resources - FGD Round Two
% of barangays
Nbr of barangays
CLD for the Agricultural Food System
Population DeathsBirths
+
+R1
+
-B1
Emigration
Emigration rate
Immigration Immigration rate
+
-
+
+
B2
R2
+
+
Labour / Job ratio
Jobs
-
-
Labour
+
+
B3
Tourist Population Development
+
+
Attractiveness ofarea to tourists
++R3
Reclaimation
Mangrove Cover
Cutting & Logging
Demand for Charcoal
Demand fornon-timber resources
Illegal occupancyof forest
Clearing for landownership
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
Demand for timber
+
-
+
+
Demand for sand& gravel
Forest Cover
-
Land clearing fordevelopment
+
Quarrying
Erosion andSedimentation
Water Quality
+
+
-+
-
B5
+
-
B8
Coral Reef Cover
Tourist Activities
Boat anchoring andtrampling corals
+
+
-
+
Sewage
+
-Disease Outbreak
+
-
Price of locallyproduced Ag Products Demand for
Agricultural Products
Supply / Demand Ratiofor Agricultural Products
Supply ofAgricultural Products
Vertically IntegratedHotel Supply Chains
Import ofAgricultural Products
-
--B15
+
+
++
Demand for Water
Water Supply /Demand Ratio
Water Supply+
+
+
Water ShortagesAgricultural
Productivity (yieldper ha)
Fertiliser
Pesticide
Agrochemical Runoff
-
+
+
++
Agricultural Production
+
+
-
Agricultural Land
Land Clearing forAgricultural
Development
Land that can becleared for Agriculture
Total SuitableAgricultural Land
Demand forAgricultural Land
Income from Farming
++
Attractiveness ofFarming
Shift to Tourism andother Employment
Attractiveness ofother EmploymentIncome from other
Employment
+ -
+
+
+
-
+
++
-
+
+
-
-
-
B4
B6
B7
B9
B10
+
B11
B12
B13
B14
B16
+
CLD for tourism, development & habitat degradation
Livelihoods and alternative food sources impacting on the food system
3. Formulation of simulation models
Going from a conceptual qualitative understanding to..
To a quantitative dynamic model of the system
Thank you
Acknowledgements• Dr Carl Smith, The University of Queensland• Dr Russell Richards, The University of Queensland• Prof. Angela (Helen) Ross, The University of Queensland• Ms Noreen (Kubi) Follosco, University of the Philippines• Ms Miladel Quibilan, University of the Philippines• El Nido Foundation• Capturing Coral Reef and Related Ecosystem Services
Project• World Bank• Global Environment Facility