Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

19
INTERESTS, PERCEPTIONS AND IDEAS: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR COMBATING CLIMATE CHANGE Samuel Munyua Kimani IFRI/CRC -Kenya Kenya Forestry Research Institute

Transcript of Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

Page 1: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

INTERESTS, PERCEPTIONS AND IDEAS: INSTITUTIONAL

FRAMEWORK FOR COMBATING CLIMATE CHANGE

Samuel Munyua Kimani

IFRI/CRC -Kenya

Kenya Forestry Research Institute

Page 2: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

What are weak or strong

a. Policies

b. Institutions?

Effects of decentralization and property reform policies on forest resources

Page 3: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

Introduction

Forest conditions and human use of forests are largely determined by the local institutions

Globally, policy and legislation are important management instruments, which can impede or enhance the contribution of a forest resource to national development and sustainable livelihoods

Sustainable institutions are more often costly to create and maintain (Gibson et al., 2000)

Forest excisions and illegal encroachment have led to reduction of forest cover by 4% annually

Page 4: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

Objectives

To understand the link between forest condition and the institutions,

To establish the relationship between institutions (political, research and local grassroots) and climate change, and

To analyze institutions interests, perceptions and ideas in natural forest conservation, and in combating climate change.

Page 5: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

Study area

Location of Kakamega (A) Arabuko Sokoke (B) Forests and Kenya (C)

Page 6: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

Forest Condition and Institutions Kakamega forest is largely a

secondary forest with the original species composition having been cut.

The forest is an ideal example of a forest showing the possibility of artificial regeneration of a forest that indeed mimics a natural condition.

The forest has three distinct canopy layers i.e.

upper storey with an average height of btwn 30 and 50 m

middle storey with an average height of btwn 15 and 30 m and

lower storey with an average height of 10 m high

Arabuko sokoke forest supports remarkable biodiversity that includes endemic and endangered flora and fauna.

It comprises of three distinct vegetation types i.e. mixed forest, Brachystegia sp and Cynometra sp

About 20% of Kenya's bird species of which six are endangered and two of which are endemic

Close to 30% of Kenya’s butterflies have also been recorded in this forest.

These high proportions of endemic bird species, some only known from this forest, make Arabuko Sokoke forest an important endemic bird area in the entire East African coast.

Page 7: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

Institutions involved in management/use of Arabuko Sokoke forest

Page 8: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

Institutions involved in management/use of Kakamega forest

Page 9: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

Relationship between institutions and climate change

In both forest as shown in the Figures 2 and 3 respectively, all the organizations are interlinked through various forms such as collaboration, information sharing, funding, etc.

The circles represent the different stakeholders involved in the use and management of the forest.

The size of the circle depicts the magnitude of the role the stakeholder plays in the management of the forest.

The bigger the circle, the bigger the role played by the particular stakeholder.

The distance of the circle from the forest also indicates the strength of the stakeholder in decision making on forest management.

Page 10: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

Institutional Analysis in combating/ adapting to climate change

The IAD Interrelations Framework (Source - Ostrom, et al. 1994)

Page 11: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

Research institutions have interests in improving the management of flora and fauna in and around both forests. Their ideas are translated to the local grassroots’ institutions by capacity building and awareness creation through workshops and seminars, co-ordination, technical advice and information sharing. Their perceptions is that the community are better managers of natural resources and jointly plan and implement conservation and management activities towards realizing the stakeholder vision for the forest to remain intact and fully functioning.

Page 12: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

The political institutions is interested in restoring degraded habitats through seeking substitutes to forest products such as agro forestry, tree planting, carrying out forest enrichment. However, through teamwork their idea is to allocate different duties to various organizations in line with the government strategic plan. Their perception is that they will mitigate causes of poverty among forest adjacent communities through promoting non consumptive and non destructive use of the forest (bee keeping and butterfly farming), promoting diversification of activities to reduce dependence on the forest and involving local communities in other forest centered activities such as ecotourism and butterfly farming.

Page 13: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

The grassroots’ institutions are interested in sustainable resource use with high turnover equivalent to the time they spend in conserving the forest. Their perception is that forest products are free goods and there should be unrestricted access and liberty of making rules that will bend low down towards their expectations. Their idea is to have opportunities to participate in meaningful ways in the management of the forest and as primary beneficiaries of its products and services among other functions. This in essence works towards save guiding the forest resource base by the communities for their own use and as carbon stock and flat forms for carbon sinks, thus enhancing mitigating impacts of climate change.

Page 14: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

Frequency Distribution of Different Classes of Combating/Adaptation Practices

Class of Combating/ Adapting to climate change

Corresponding Combating strategies

Frequency* Kakamega Arabuko

Mobility

1. Development projects 2. Wage labour migration 3. Involuntary migration 4. Remittances (joint with exchange)

2 4

Storage

1. Water storage 2. Food storage (crops, seeds, forest products) 3.Animal/live storage 4. Pest control

11 13

Diversification

1. Asset portfolio diversification 2.Skills and occupational training 3.Occupational diversification 4. Crop choices 5. Production technologies 6. Consumption choices 7. Animal breeding

33 27

Communal pooling

1. Forestry 2. Infrastructure development 3. Information gathering 4. Disaster preparation

16 29

Exchange

1. Improved market access 2.Insurance provision 3. New product sales 4. Seeds, animal, and other input purchases; remittances (joint with mobility)

1 13

Page 15: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

The flow and linkage of institutions and linkages

Page 16: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

Conclusion A combination of political and research institutions enhance

local communities adaptation strategies by providing proven techniques and expertise and this add value to particularly, diversification and communal pooling adaptation

Despite the critical importance of local institutions in shaping adaptive responses to climate change, existing work on research and policy regulations focuses primarily on technological, infrastructure, embankments, dams, flood proof buildings, and provision of new crops as alternative options.

However, even with the efforts by both political, research and local institutions, a number of institutional obstacles such as social resistance to change, weak governance, ineffective institutional arrangements and lack of information on key vulnerability indicators remain a challenge.

Page 17: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

General recommendations

A greater role for institutional partnerships in facilitating adaptation to climate change is needed

Before providing resources and external support, the role of local institutions and their linkages must be understood

Institutional coordination across scales, for better planning and implementation must be improved

An adaptive perspective on institutional development must be adopted

Page 18: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

“Once climate change rolls over you, if you're not part of the

steamroller, you're part of the road.”

Page 19: Kimani: Interests, perceptions and ideas: institutional framework for combating climate change

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING

Special thanks to AFRICA ADAPT NETWORK

Director KEFRI