kim513f010

1
•Kim J, Park H, Bruce J, Rowles D, Holbrook J, Nardone B, West DP, Laumann AE, Roth E, Veledar E, Ghovanloo M. Qualitative assessment of Tongue Drive System by people with high-level spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(3):451–66. •http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.08.0178 •ResearcherID/ORCID: Maysam Ghovanloo, PhD: D-8343-2014 Figure 10. Questions related to Tongue Drive System (TDS) usability compared with other assistive technologies. AT = assistive technology, PQ = poststudy system usability questionnaire question, PWC = powered wheelchair, SnP = sip-and-puff.

description

Figure 10. Questions related to Tongue Drive System (TDS) usability compared with other assistive technologies. AT = assistive technology, PQ = poststudy system usability questionnaire question, PWC = powered wheelchair, SnP = sip-and-puff. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of kim513f010

Page 1: kim513f010

•Kim J, Park H, Bruce J, Rowles D, Holbrook J, Nardone B, West DP, Laumann AE, Roth E, Veledar E, Ghovanloo M. Qualitative assessment of Tongue Drive System by people with high-level spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(3):451–66.

•http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.08.0178

•ResearcherID/ORCID: Maysam Ghovanloo, PhD: D-8343-2014

Figure 10. Questions related to Tongue Drive System (TDS) usability compared with other assistive technologies. AT = assistive technology, PQ = poststudy system usability questionnaire question, PWC = powered wheelchair, SnP = sip-and-puff.