Khushi Final Ppt
-
Upload
khushbu-sanghavi -
Category
Documents
-
view
231 -
download
0
Transcript of Khushi Final Ppt
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
1/40
AA
SURVEY ONSURVEY ON
TEAM MANAGEMENTTEAM MANAGEMENTPREPARED BY:
SHRUT ADANI - HRM:A01DALIAH RODRIGUES - HRM A:08
KHUSHBU SANGHAVI-HRM:A26
1
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
2/40
Dependent Variable: Team Management/Responses
Independent variable : - Gender
- Age
- Work Experience
- Designation
Sector : Information Technology
Companies : Wipro, L&T, Infosys, Syntel, P & B Planet Company
Scoring:
Option Score Assigned
Always 5
Usually 4Sometimes 3
Seldom 2
Never 1
2PERFORMANCEOF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
3/40
Graphical Presentation of:
1. Age & Designation
2. Work Experience & Designation3. Response on Team Management V/S
-Age
- Gender
-Work Experience
- Designation
3PERFORMANCEOF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
4/40
Comparison of Respondents on theComparison of Respondents on the
basis of Genderbasis of Gender
Male 77.00%
Female 23.00%
4PERFORMANCEOF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
5/40
Dependent Variable DataDependent Variable Data
Categories Class Frequency %
GoodTeam Management 20-46 0 0
Fair Team Management 47-73 21 34.42
Poor Team Management 74-100 40 65.57
5PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
6/40
Age & DesignationAge & DesignationAge
(years)
Designation
Engineer Group Leader Senior
Developer
Technician Trainee Total
20-2520 1 4 3 6 34
26-309 4 8 2 0 23
>300 3 1 0 0 4
Majority of respondents :Engineers
within the age group of20-25 years
i.e. 33%
Trainees : < 25 years
0
510
15
20
25
30
35
Engineer GroupLeader
SeniorDeveloper
Technician Trainee
Age
Designation
>30 26-30 20-25
6PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
7/40
Age Designation
Engineer
Group
Leader
Senior
Developer Technician Trainee Total %
20-25 33% 2% 7% 5% 10% 57%
26-30 15% 6% 13% 3% 0 37%
>30 0 5% 2% 0 0 7%
Total 48% 13% 21% 8% 10% 100
7PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
8/40
Work Experience & DesignationWork Experience & DesignationWork
Experience
(years)
Designation
Engineer Group
Leader
Senior
Developer
Technician Trainee Total
10 0 1 0 0 0 1
Total 29 8 13 5 6 61
02468
101214
Work
experience
Designation
>1 1 to 3 3 to 5 5 to 7 8 to 10 >10
Engineers with 1-3 years work
experience: 25% response to
good team management.
Group Leaders & Senior
Developers with 3-7 years work
experience: 5% response to team
management.
8PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
9/40
Work experience Designation
Engineer
Group
Leader
Senior
Developer Technician Trainee %
less than 1year 11% 0 0 0 5% 16%
1-3years 21% 2% 1% 7% 5% 36%
3-5years 13% 1% 13% 2% 0 30%
5-8years 2% 8% 5% 0 0 15%
8-10years 0 0 2% 0 0 2%
more than 10years 0 2% 0 0 0 1%
Total 48% 13% 21% 9% 10% 100
9PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
10/40
Team Management & GenderTeam Management & Gender
Categories Class Gender
Male Female Total
Poor Team Management 20-46 0 0 0
Fair Team management 47-73 15 6 21
Good Team Management 74-100 32 8 40
Total 47 14 61
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Male Female
TeamM
anagement
Gender
20-46 47-73 74-100 Male team members are
good managers.
Females are fair team
mangers because of less
ratio.
10PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
11/40
Categories Class Gender
Male % Female %Total %
Poor Team Managers 20-460 0 0
Fair Team Managers 47-73 25 10 34
Good Team Managers 74-10052 13 66
Total77 23 100
11PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
12/40
Team Management & AgeTeam Management & AgeCategories Class Age (years)
20-25 26-30 >30 Total
Poor Team Management 20-460 0 0 0
Fair Team management 47-7317 3 1 21
Good Team Management 74-10017 20 3 40
Total34 23 4 61
0
20
40
20-25years
26-30 years
>30 years
TeamManagement
Age
20-25 years (age): 30% response to fair
team management
26-30 years(age):35% response to good
team management.
>30years(age): poor team management.
12PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
13/40
Categories Class Age20-25years 26-30 years Total
Poor Team Managers 20-46 0 % 0 % 0
Fair Team Managers 47-73 28 % 5 % 34 %
Good Team Managers 74-100 28 % 33 % 66 %
Total 56 % 38 % 100 %
13PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
14/40
Team Management &Work ExperienceTeam Management &Work ExperienceCategories Class Work Experience (years)
10 Total
Poor Team
Management
20-46
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fair Team
management
47-73
6 9 4 1 1 0 21
Good Team
Management
74-100
4 13 14 8 0 1 40
Total 10 22 18 9 1 1 61
0
5
10
15
T
eam
Mana
gement
Work Experience
Poor TeamManagers 20-46
Fair Team
Managers 47-73Good TeamManagers 74-100
3-5 years work
experience: 25%
response to good
team management.
>5 years work
experience: fair
team management.
14PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
15/40
Categories Class Work Experience
10years Total
Poor Team
Managers
20-46
0 % 0 % 0 0 0 0
Fair Team
Managers
47-73
10 % 15 % 2 % 2% 0 34 %
Good Team
Managers
74-100
7 % 21 % 13 % 0 2% 66 %
Total 16 % 36 % 15 % 2 % 2% 100
15PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
16/40
Team Management &Team Management &
DesignationDesignationCategories Class
Designation
Engineer Group
Leader
Senior
Developer
Technician Trainee Total
Poor Team
Management
20-46
0 0 0 0 0 0
Fair Team
management
47-73
6 1 6 2 6 21
Good TeamManagement 74-100 23 7 7 3 0 40
Total 29 8 13 5 6 61
05
1015202530
TeamManagement
Designation
Good Team Managers 74-100
Fair Team Managers 47-73
Poor Team Managers 20-46
Engineers: 40% response ongood team management.
Technicians: 3% response on
good team management.
16PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
17/40
Categories Class Designation
Engineer
Group
Leader Technician Trainee Total
Poor Team
Managers
20-46
0 0 0 0 0
Fair Team Managers 47-73
10 % 2 % 3 % 10 % 34 %
Good TeamManagers 74-100
38 % 11 % 5% 0 66 %
Total48 % 13 % 8 % 10 % 100
17PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
18/40
TESTING OF HYPOTHESISTESTING OF HYPOTHESIS
y A) Chi Square (G2)= Categorical Data
y B) Correlation (r) = Continuous Data
y C) Average Responses V/S Performance
on Team Management
y D) Case Study
18PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
19/40
ChiChi Square (Square (GG22))
1. Team Management Performance
& Gender:
Categories Class Gender
Male Female Total
Fair Team
management
47-73
15 6 21
Good TeamManagement 74-100 32 8 40
Total 47 14 61
19PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
20/40
y Null Hypothesis: There is no association between TeamManagement Performance & Gender
y G2 cal = 0.58y G2 tab = 3.841
y Conclusion: G2 cal (0.58) < G2 tab (3.841) . Therefore,Hypothesis is accepted.
y Interpretation:
- Gender has no association with Performance of Team
- Young professionals have ample of knowledge of latesttechnology and so gender does not affect a performance of ateam.
- Subsequently, in a good team mgmt there are seniorprofessionals, male or female, dont have knowledge of newlatest technology but still they have that much ability tohandle the whole team as a one.
20PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
21/40
2.Team Management Performance &Age:
Categories Class Age (years)
20-25 26-30 >30 Total
Fair Team
management
47-73
17 3 1 21
Good Team
Management
74-100
17 20 3 40
Total34 23 4 61
21PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
22/40
y Null Hypothesis: There is no association between TeamManagement Performance & Age
y G2 cal = 8.4641y G2 tab = 5.991
y Conclusion : G2 cal (8.4641) > G2
tab (5.991).ThereforeHypothesis is rejected
y Interpretation:
- Age of the Team members affects the performance of team.
- Between the ages of 20-25 years normally a person is graduatedand they seldom get chance to take decisions and are sometimesunable to tackle various situations which senior employees can
handle easily from their past experience.- Moreover as and when the age increases the knowledge and
qualification comes up to mark which increases the level of aperformance of a team.
22PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
23/40
3.Team Management
Performance & Work
Experience:
Categories Class Work Experience (years)
10 Total
Fair Team
management
47-73
6 9 4 1 1 0 21
Good Team
Management
74-100
4 13 14 8 0 1 40
Total10 22 18 9 1 1 61
23PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
24/40
y Null Hypothesis: There is no association of WorkExperience on Team Management Performance.
y G2 cal = 7.86y G2 tab =9.48
y Conclusion :G2 cal (7.86)< G2
tab (9.48). Thereforehypothesis is accepted
y Interpretation:
- There is no association of Work Experience on TeamManagement Performance.
- The matter which should be considered is whether the
employee is capable to bring the team mgmtperformance to another high level or not.
- Sometimes a fresher becomes a reason for a good teammgmt performance which another employee of moreexperienced is never been able to bring.
24PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
25/40
4. Team Management
Performance & Designation:
Categories Class Designation
Engineer Group
Leader
Senior
Developer
Technician Trainee Total
Fair Team
management
47-73
6 1 6 2 6 21
Good Team
Management
74-100
23 7 7 3 0 40
Total
29 8 13 5 6 61
25PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
26/40
y Null Hypothesis: There is no association between TeamManagement Performance & Designation.
yG
2
cal = 23.91y G2 tab = 9.488
y Conclusion :G2 cal (23.91) > G2
tab (9.488). Thereforehypothesis is Rejected
y Interpretation:
- Performance of team management is affected by designationof its members
- Senior professionals are capable enough to boost the moraleof his juniors and the competition scenario of the current
corporate world has made the statement true that yes theperformance of a team mgmt is affected by designation.
- Whatever the team leader says has to be followed majorityof the times, so if the performance is good or bad, ability ofteam leader is only highlighted.
26PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
27/40
Correlation (r)Correlation (r)
1.Work Experience of leader and QuickDecision making:
y Null Hypothesis:Quick decision making (V1) has no
relationship with the work experience of the leader(V2).
y r Value: 0.1742
y Conclusion: Value(r) is
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
28/40
2.Experienced Leader and Skilled TeamLeader
y Null Hypothesis: There is no relation between Experienceof the leader and skill of team leader.
y r Value: 0.1929
y Conclusion: Value(r) is
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
29/40
3.Proper Planning and Stress
y Null Hypotheses: There is no relationship between properplanning and stress.
y r value: -0.055
y
Conclusion: Value(r) is
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
30/40
4.MonitorWork and Praise the Team
yNull Hypothesis: There is no relation between Monitoringwork (V1) and praising (V2) the team members.
y r Value: 0.0652
y
Conclusion: Value(r) is
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
31/40
5.Size of the Team and Duration of theProject.
y Null Hypothesis: There is no relation between size ofthe team (V1) and duration of the project (V2).
y r Value: 0.384
y Conclusion: Value(r) is
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
32/40
6.Designation and Communication
y Null Hypotheses: There is no relation betweendesignation and communication.
y r Value: -0.075
y Conclusion: Value(r) is
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
33/40
7.Appreciation and Stress Reduction
y
Null Hypothesis: There is no relationship betweenAppreciation and stress reduction.
y r Value: 0.285
y Conclusion: Value(r) is
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
34/40
8.WorkIndependently and Reduced Stress
y Null Hypotheses: Working independently (V1) has no relationship on stress
reduction(V2).
y r Value: 0.3597
y Conclusion: Value(r) is
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
35/40
Average Responses V/S PerformanceAverage Responses V/S Performance
on Team Managementon Team Management
y The average score for the question Good communicationis necessary to avoid dispute among members, was observedas the highest scored item (4.66) amongst all.
y The average score for the question Team leaders need tounderstand the strength of the team members beforeassigning the task was observed as the 2nd highest scoreditem(4.47) amongst all.
y Meaning out of all the 20 questions asked these 2 questionswas considered as most important by majority of therespondents and were responded as always.
y So, for a better O/P, it is necessary to understand thestrength of team members and a proper communicationwithin the team and with other coordinates is alsonecessary.
35
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM
MANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
36/40
y The average score for the question If you are highly
skilled team leader, it does not matter who is in your
team, was observed as the least scored item (2.91)
amongst all.
y The average score for the question Designation of the
members of the team creates conflicts, was observed as
the 2nd least scored item (3.06) amongst all.
y Meaning out of all the 20 questions asked these 2 questions
were given the minimum weightage by majority of the
respondents and were responded as never.
y Thus, a good performance of the team depends on overall
contribution of all team members irrespective of Team
Leaders Skills and Designation of the members.
36
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM
MANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
37/40
Case Study Response:Case Study Response:
1.75
1.8
1.85
1.9
1.95
2
2.05
Employers are
unethical
Firm is
breaking thecontract
Allow him to
workindependentlyfor better O/P
Adjust to be a
Team Player
Provide
Training to bea Team Player
Re
sponse
37
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM
MANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
38/40
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONFair Team Management:Age : 20-25years
Work Experience : 1-3 years
Designation : Engineers and Senior Developers
Recommendations :
- In age and work experience : Fair Management -> Good
Management
- Senior Developers : Show fair Management instead of GoodManagement
38
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM
MANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
39/40
Good Team Management:
Age : 26-30years
Work Experience : 3-5years
Designation : Engineers
Recommendations :
- In Team Management : 5yrs of work experience-Work Independently
-Young Age : Healthy competition
: Enthusiastic
: Efficient: Technological changes
- Seniors : in Boredom -> O/P
39
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM
MANAGEMENT
-
8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt
40/40
Conclusion:Conclusion:
y Gender &Work Experience has no effect onTeam Management Performance.
y Age & Designation play a vital role on TeamManagement Performance.
y Team members should have a proper flow ofcommunication and they should be allowed towork independently.
y It is the duty of the Team Leader to understand
the strength of the team and then assign thework.
y Skill of a Team leader & Designation doesnot affect performance of the Team
40
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM
MANAGEMENT