Key Performance Indicators for Technical Operation

23
1 Impact of new technology on shipping operations - Workshop - Danaos Auditorium, Piraeus, Greece – May 13th FLAGSHIP SP A2 Key performance indicators for technical operation MARINTEK - Brage Mo, senior research engineer

description

Key Performance Indicators for Technical Operation

Transcript of Key Performance Indicators for Technical Operation

  • 1Impact of new technology on shipping operations- Workshop -

    Danaos Auditorium, Piraeus, Greece May 13th

    FLAGSHIP SP A2Key performance indicators for technical

    operationMARINTEK - Brage Mo, senior research engineer

  • 2 The use of key performance indicators (KPI) has become a recognised practice in measuring performance

    The cargo owners and legislation bodies are increasingly focusing on documented proactive operation

    Efficiency Environmentally Safety

    Aggregated performance models of ships need to be made by transparent and consistent assessments of their technical condition

    Background

  • 3The TCI, the Technical Condition Index, is defined as follows: The Technical Condition Index, denoted TCI, is defined as the degree of

    degradation relative to the design condition. The TCI can apply to equipment, a system, a whole ship or a fleet of ships. It

    may take values between a minimum and a maximum value, where themaximum value describes the design condition [e.g. sea trial condition], TCI=100, and the minimum value describes the state of total degradation, TCI=0.

    The state of total degradation is the condition so unsatisfactory that the equipment, system or ship is prevented from carrying out its primary function.

    It is important to distinguish between the TCI and the KPI. The KPI are financial and non-financial metrics used to help an organization define and measure progress toward organizational goals [6]. In some instances the KPI and TCI can be the same thing, i.e. if one uses fuels cost as a KPI, this will be the same as the TCI fuel consumption.

    TCI definition

  • 4Ship registrations decision support

    Registrations of measurements

    Consultancy

    TCIs

    Efficiency Degradation Balance

    Actions

    Evaluations and actions in technical issues

  • 5Shore also follow-up TCIs

    Action

    Attention

    OK

    S

    h

    i

    p

    S

    u

    p

    e

    r

    i

    n

    t

    e

    n

    d

    e

    n

    t

    F

    l

    e

    e

    t

    M

    g

    r

    . Technical performance

  • 6AGGREGATEDSHIP FLEET INDEX (TCIs)

    w2/Tw

    Mean

    Aux EnginePerformance

    w1/Tw

    Mean

    Main Engine Performance

    w3/Tw

    Mean

    ThrusterPerformance

    Ship 1

    W WW W

  • 7TCI SpecificationAE Performance model

    1 Aux. engine performance

    1.2 Balance

    1.1 Efficiency

    WSum

    10 x

    10 x

    1.3 Degradation10 x

  • 8TCI SpecificationAE Performance model

    Index functionValue Index From reference

    1.02 0 -30.0 %1.23 80 -15.0 %1.29 90 -11.3 %1.34 100 -7.5 %1.56 100 7.5 %1.61 90 11.3 %1.67 80 15.0 %1.81 0 25.0 %

    Scavenging air receiver pressure [bar]

    020406080

    100120

    0.80 1.10 1.40 1.70 2.00

    User function

    T

    e

    c

    h

    n

    i

    c

    a

    l

    C

    o

    n

    d

    i

    t

    i

    o

    n

    I

    n

    d

    e

    x

    (

    T

    C

    I

    )

  • 9TCI SpecificationAE Performance model

    M10. Pscav Receiver

    Ideal performance

    Engine load 50 75 100 [%]Scav_air_press 0.78 1.45 2.12 [bar]BHP 119.0 178.3 237.7 [BHP]Power 87.5 131.2 174.8 [kW]

    Reference value:1.45 0 131.171.45 100 131.17

    Calculated value:

    K_scav = 0.0153

    _ _ _( 25) 0, 002856corr meas Pscav ref M meas Eng room meas measPscav Pscav K Power Power T Pscav

    Scavenging air pressure [bar]

    0.50

    1.00

    1.50

    2.00

    2.50

    80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0

    Power [kW]

    s

    c

    a

    v

    .

    a

    i

    r

    p

    r

    e

    s

    s

    u

    r

    e

    2 1

    2 1Pscav

    Pscav PscavKPower Power

    1_

    ( )n

    measi

    M meas

    BHP iBHP

    n

  • 10

    ExampleFLEET PERFORMANCE

    A holistic view that assesses units

    Efficiency

    Degradation

    Balance

    {Balance - comparing units expected to have equal performance}

    A holistic view that assesses

    Several Fleets (A, B, C, D,..)

    with Ships (A1, A2,..,B1,..)

  • 11

    Example

    SELECTING CATEGORY of PERFORMANCE

    Reducing holistic view of fleets to e.g.

    Efficiency

    Stakeholders interests defines

    Selection of what to be presented, e.g.

    Efficiency

    SFOC (Specific Fuel Oil Consumption)

    Speed / Fuel oil Consumption

    New data/ assessments {SP A1, SP B1?}

  • 12

    Develop formsInput ship static dataSend forms to ship

    Install formsInput measure dataValidateSend xml data

    Use email Receive xml/emailValidateStore dataAnalyzeProduce reportSend report to ship

    Receive reportDo maintenance

    Implementation Procedure

  • 13

    ME Registrations (Trial/ Ideal)

  • 14

    Processing ME sea-trial data

  • 15

    Processing of operational data

  • 16

    TCI results ME

  • 17

    TCI results ME efficiency

  • 18

    Analysis to Support Shipfor ME opt. (automated)

    Attention

    Action

  • 19

    AE Registrations (Trial/ Ideal)

  • 20

    Processing AE Trial data

  • 21

    Implement TCI results into business processes

    StakeholdersOwners/ managers of shipsManufacturers of equipment

    ClassShipyards

    TCIResults

    Beneficial use(Interest)

    Stakeholders Process

  • 22

    Business process revision

    Business processes might be different within similar businesses

    Stakeholders know best how TCI results fit into their business processes

    Consequently, stakeholders identify/ describe/ illustrate/ exemplify how the results fit into their organisations processes

    Stakeholders Process

  • 23

    Thank you for your attention!