Key Elements and Issues in AT Reuse as a Component in Emergency Management
description
Transcript of Key Elements and Issues in AT Reuse as a Component in Emergency Management
Sara Sack, Ph.D.Assistive Technology for Kansans
National Summit on Emergency Managementand Assistive Technology Reutilization
February 23-24, 2010
ATK is the Statewide AT Program for Kansas
ATK’s goal was to become a part of our state’s emergency management plan
Small N to date: Experience in responding to 7 disasters (1 Level 5 tornado, 2 Level 3 tornadoes, 1 fire, and 3 floods)
ATK had much to contribute but wasn’t “ready” to participate
Needed to learn from the experts Needed the experience of preparing as
an organization and as an individual Needed to conduct a program analysis
to determine what we had to contribute and how we could manage these resources
Knowledge about assistive technology, durable medical equipment, and disability
Direct source of equipment for shelters and individuals
Indirect source of equipment—we know who else has equipment in the state (vendors, loan closets, etc.)
Statewide presence and connections
System already in place for moving equipment
Connected to the national AT/DME reutilization network to respond to large disasters
What inventory would we have ready to deploy? All categories of AT/DME collected within our
reutilization program How would we know what equipment we
had at any given point in time? Real time online equipment inventory
(hosted out of state and backed up daily) Where would the equipment be located?
At 6 AT Access Sites located across the state
How quickly could we reasonably collect the equipment? 24 hours
What additional equipment might be available? Network of 31 loan closets across the
state. Know general categories of equipment that they have and ATK has a disaster response plan in place with them.
How could we get the equipment to the disaster site? Use the delivery system of our
Reutilization Program, coordinate with Red Cross, use commercial carriers (Over-the-road carriers, UPS, Fed Ex, etc.)
How do others know what we have and how do we know what individuals need? View on-line inventory or share PDF of
available equipment pulled from on-line inventory
Obtain equipment needed list from SRS services, Red Cross, and other coordinating entities
How can agencies share this information without violating Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)? Reutilization program has a Business
Associate Agreement with state agency and is bound by regulations and protection standards
Individual can authorize the sharing of needed information
Who assumes responsibility for matching equipment and arranging for transportation? Follow chain of command: Reutilization
Coordinator, if unavailable then Program Director, management staff, AT Access Site Reutilization Coordinator from unaffected area
Who pays for transportation of equipment? No good answer To date we have used volunteers and
associated staff to transport equipment within the state
When expenses were incurred, billed as reutilization program expenses but not sustainable
What is the scope? Will individuals be in the area or will they be
scattered to various shelters, relatives, etc? What specific equipment is needed and
how do you know? Used lists and when people were dispersed
ran Public Service Announcements (PSAs) to locate persons who needed technology
What sources of equipment are nearby?
Where should the equipment go? Learned that access to the area will be
controlled and that the number of entries would be limited
How can we get the equipment there? Who will be onsite to help with
reassignment of the equipment? Who will receive and sign for the
equipment?
Statewide AT program and reutilization program staff have knowledge about AT/DME and disability
Reutilization programs may have access to lightly used, high quality assistive technology and DME
Programs may need assistance with inventory tracking to respond rapidly
Programs have connections within their states but would need to expand partnerships to respond in a comprehensive manner
Programs currently have a plan for moving equipment but would need assistance and further development to respond rapidly
Responding to disasters beyond the state/territory boundaries presents additional challenges
Contact information:
Sara Sack, Ph.D. Senior Professor, University of Kansas Director, Assistive Technology for
Kansans 2601 Gabriel Ave. Parsons, KS 67357 620-421-8367 [email protected]
National Response Framework(http://www.fema.gov/emergency/nrf/)
The National Response Framework presents the guiding principles that enable all response partners to prepare for and provide a unified national response to disasters and emergencies – from the smallest incident to the largest catastrophe. The Framework establishes a comprehensive, national, all-hazards approach to domestic incident response.
Emergency Support Functions ESF 1-Transportation
ESF 2-CommunicationsESF 3-Public WorksESF 4-FirefightingESF 5-Information and PlanningESF 6-Mass CareESF 7-Resource SupportESF 8-Health and MedicalESF 9-Search and Rescue
Emergency Support Functions ESF 10-Hazardous Materials
ESF 11-Food and WaterESF 12-EnergyESF 13-Military SupportESF 14-Public InformationESF 15-Volunteers and DonationsESF 16-Law EnforcementESF 17-Animal Services
Where do AT, AT Reuse and other related organizations fit in?
University Centers of Excellence, DD Councils, Disability Rights Networks etc.
They must be considered as in-kind agencies and included in the National Response Framework and the Long Term Recovery Plan.
Response cannot be added onto existing responsibilities without additional funding.