Key amendments to the debt restructuring regime in … by Calvin Tan, Simmons & Simmons JWS,...

2
1 by Calvin Tan, Simmons & Simmons JWS, Mohammed Reza, Simmons & Simmons JWS, and Justin Kwek, JWS Asia Law Corporation * In a bid to promote Singapore as an international debt restructuring hub, the Singapore Companies Act has been amended. Some of these amendments introduce features drawn from Chapter Eleven of the United States Bankruptcy Code - for instance, the introduction of rescue financing provisions and cram down provisions for dissenting classes of creditors in Schemes of Arrangements. These amendments came into operation on May 23, 2017, and are expected to change the debt restructuring landscape in Singapore. This article discusses some of the key amendments. In recent years, concerted efforts have been made to promote Singapore as the choice jurisdiction for insolvencies and restructurings in the region. Those efforts are long overdue and welcome. Singapore's status as a leading global financial hub has meant that it has seen a wave of cross-border restructurings in recent years given the slowdown in economic growth. Indeed, the Singapore High Court has noted in a recent judgment that cross-border restructurings are increasingly becoming common given the proliferation of cross-border investments and trade. An important prong of the efforts to promote Singapore as an international debt restructuring hub has been the reform of the debt restructuring provisions in the Singapore Companies Act. These reforms came into operation on May 23, 2017, and are expected to change the debt restructuring landscape in Singapore. We provide a brief overview of the more significant amendments. Schemes of Arrangement The Scheme of Arrangement regime will adapt parts of Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code: Broader moratorium: An interim moratorium for a period of up to 30 days will come into force automatically when the company makes an application for a moratorium order under the new Section * JWS Asia Law Corporation is the constituent Singapore law practice of Simmons & Simmons JWS. All Singapore court litigation and related advice is provided through JWS Asia Law Corporation. 2116(1) of the Companies Act. The moratorium order made under Section 211B(1) may also extend to related entities of the company. Enhanced cram down provisions: The Court may order that a compromise under a scheme of arrangement bind all creditors even if there are dissenting classes. Rescue financing: Rescue financing provisions have been introduced, where the Court could confer super-priority on fresh financing which is necessary for the survival of a company, or to achieve a more advantageous realisation of the assets of a company that obtains the financing. Pre-pack restructurings: The Court may approve pre-negotiated restructurings between the company and its creditors, dispensing with the requirement for creditor meetings. Subsidiary legislation has been passed to provide for carve outs from the moratorium - for instance, in respect of certain set-off and netting arrangements. Judicial Management Enhancements have been made, with a view to making the Judicial Management process a more attractive regime for debt restructuring: Near insolvent companies: A judicial management order may be made even when a company is "likely to become unable to pay its debts", as opposed to the previous requirement which required proof that the company "is or will be unable to pay its debts". Consideration of unsecured creditors' interests: Previously, the Court had to dismiss an application for a judicial management order if it was satisfied that the making of the judicial management order was opposed by a person who had appointed or had been entitled to appoint a receiver and manager of the whole (or substantially the whole) of a company's property under the terms of any debentures of the company secured by a floating charge, or by a floating charge and one or more fixed charges (Qualifying Debenture Holder). Under the amended judicial management provisions, a more measured approach will be taken. The Court must dismiss an application for a judicial management order if the prejudice which would be caused to a Qualifying Debenture Holder if the order is made is disproportionately greater than the prejudice that would be caused to the unsecured creditors of the company if the application is dismissed. Key amendments to the debt restructuring regime in Singapore

Transcript of Key amendments to the debt restructuring regime in … by Calvin Tan, Simmons & Simmons JWS,...

Page 1: Key amendments to the debt restructuring regime in … by Calvin Tan, Simmons & Simmons JWS, Mohammed Reza, Simmons & Simmons JWS, and Justin Kwek, JWS Asia Law Corporation* In a bid

1

by Calvin Tan, Simmons & Simmons JWS, Mohammed Reza, Simmons &

Simmons JWS, and Justin Kwek, JWS Asia Law Corporation*

In a bid to promote Singapore as an international debt restructuring hub,

the Singapore Companies Act has been amended. Some of these

amendments introduce features drawn from Chapter Eleven of the

United States Bankruptcy Code - for instance, the introduction of rescue

financing provisions and cram down provisions for dissenting classes of

creditors in Schemes of Arrangements. These amendments came into

operation on May 23, 2017, and are expected to change the debt

restructuring landscape in Singapore. This article discusses some of the

key amendments.

In recent years, concerted efforts have been made to promote Singapore

as the choice jurisdiction for insolvencies and restructurings in the region.

Those efforts are long overdue and welcome.

Singapore's status as a leading global financial hub has meant that it has

seen a wave of cross-border restructurings in recent years given the

slowdown in economic growth. Indeed, the Singapore High Court has

noted in a recent judgment that cross-border restructurings are

increasingly becoming common given the proliferation of cross-border

investments and trade.

An important prong of the efforts to promote Singapore as an

international debt restructuring hub has been the reform of the debt

restructuring provisions in the Singapore Companies Act. These reforms

came into operation on May 23, 2017, and are expected to change the

debt restructuring landscape in Singapore.

We provide a brief overview of the more significant amendments.

Schemes of Arrangement

The Scheme of Arrangement regime will adapt parts of Chapter 11 of the

United States Bankruptcy Code:

Broader moratorium: An interim moratorium for a period of up to

30 days will come into force automatically when the company

makes an application for a moratorium order under the new Section

*JWS Asia Law Corporation is the constituent Singapore law practice of Simmons

& Simmons JWS. All Singapore court litigation and related advice is providedthrough JWS Asia Law Corporation.

2116(1) of the Companies Act. The moratorium order made under

Section 211B(1) may also extend to related entities of the company.

Enhanced cram down provisions: The Court may order that a

compromise under a scheme of arrangement bind all creditors even

if there are dissenting classes.

Rescue financing: Rescue financing provisions have been

introduced, where the Court could confer super-priority on fresh

financing which is necessary for the survival of a company, or to

achieve a more advantageous realisation of the assets of a company

that obtains the financing.

Pre-pack restructurings: The Court may approve pre-negotiated

restructurings between the company and its creditors, dispensing

with the requirement for creditor meetings.

Subsidiary legislation has been passed to provide for carve outs from the

moratorium - for instance, in respect of certain set-off and netting

arrangements.

Judicial Management

Enhancements have been made, with a view to making the Judicial

Management process a more attractive regime for debt restructuring:

Near insolvent companies: A judicial management order may be

made even when a company is "likely to become unable to pay its

debts", as opposed to the previous requirement which required

proof that the company "is or will be unable to pay its debts".

Consideration of unsecured creditors' interests: Previously, the

Court had to dismiss an application for a judicial management order

if it was satisfied that the making of the judicial management order

was opposed by a person who had appointed or had been entitled

to appoint a receiver and manager of the whole (or substantially the

whole) of a company's property under the terms of any debentures

of the company secured by a floating charge, or by a floating charge

and one or more fixed charges (Qualifying Debenture Holder). Under

the amended judicial management provisions, a more measured

approach will be taken. The Court must dismiss an application for a

judicial management order if the prejudice which would be caused

to a Qualifying Debenture Holder if the order is made is

disproportionately greater than the prejudice that would be caused

to the unsecured creditors of the company if the application is

dismissed.

Key amendmentsto the debtrestructuringregime inSingapore

Page 2: Key amendments to the debt restructuring regime in … by Calvin Tan, Simmons & Simmons JWS, Mohammed Reza, Simmons & Simmons JWS, and Justin Kwek, JWS Asia Law Corporation* In a bid

elexica.com is the award winning online legal resource of Simmons & Simmons© Simmons & Simmons LLP 2017. All rights reserved, and all moral rights are asserted and reserved.This document is for general guidance only. It does not contain definitive advice. SIMMONS & SIMMONS and S&S are registered trade marks of Simmons & Simmons LLP.Simmons & Simmons is an international legal practice carried on by Simmons & Simmons LLP and its affiliated practices. Accordingly, references to Simmons & Simmons mean Simmons & Simmons LLP and the other partnershipsand other entities or practices authorised to use the name “Simmons & Simmons” or one or more of those practices as the context requires. The word “partner” refers to a member of Simmons & Simmons LLP or an employee orconsultant with equivalent standing and qualifications or to an individual with equivalent status in one of Simmons & Simmons LLP’s affiliated practices. For further information on the international entities and practices, refer tosimmons-simmons.com/legalresp

Simmons & Simmons LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England & Wales with number OC352713 and with its registered office at CityPoint, One Ropemaker Street, London EC2Y 9SS. It is authorised and regulated bythe Solicitors Regulation Authority.

A list of members and other partners together with their professional qualifications is available for inspection at the above address.B_LIVE_EMEA1:4438945v1

Rescue financing: Rescue financing provisions broadly similar to

those applicable to Schemes of Arrangement have been introduced.

Cross-border restructurings Foreign companies: Guidelines have now been provided on what

the Court may rely on to find that a foreign company has a

substantial connection with Singapore, such that it may be wound

up, may make an application for a scheme of arrangement or be

placed in judicial management.

UNCITRAL Model Law: The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border

Insolvency with certain modifications to adapt it for application in

Singapore will be adopted.

No ring-fencing: The rule which previously required liquidators of

foreign companies to "ring fence" Singapore assets and pay off

debts incurred in Singapore first has been abolished generally in

relation to foreign companies, subject to carve outs for certain

regulated financial entities

These reforms to the Singapore Companies Act are aimed at enhancing

Singapore's ability to function as a platform for international debt

restructuring. We believe that these reforms would make Singapore a

more attractive option to distressed companies and their creditors.

Following from the sustained downturn in commodity prices over the last

two years or so, we expect financial institutions to face increased

borrower defaults in the coming months. Financial institutions with

exposure in Singapore and the region would do well to familiarise

themselves with the new restructuring landscape in Singapore.

AuthorsCalvin Tan,Partner,Simmons & Simmons JWST +65 6831 5631F +65 6831 5688E [email protected]

Mohammed Reza,Partner,Simmons & Simmons JWST +65 6831 5582F +65 6831 5688E [email protected]

Justin Kwek,Supervising Associate,JWS Asia Law CorporationT +65 6831 5598F +65 6831 5568E [email protected]

JWS Asia Law Corporation168 Robinson Road,#11-01, Capital Tower,Singapore (068912)