MANAGING THE SEAPORT IN THE MANAGING THE SEAPORT IN THE ERA OF LOCAL AUTONOMY ERA OF LOCAL AUTONOMY

(WITHIN THE CORRIDOR OF LAW 32 YEAR 2004 CONCERNING LOCAL

GOVERNMENT

BY:DR.MADE SUWANDI

Director of Local Government FunctionDirectorate General of Regional Autonomy

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

MANAGING THE SEAPORT IN THE MANAGING THE SEAPORT IN THE ERA OF LOCAL AUTONOMY ERA OF LOCAL AUTONOMY

(WITHIN THE CORRIDOR OF LAW 32 YEAR 2004 CONCERNING LOCAL

GOVERNMENT

BY:DR.MADE SUWANDI

Director of Local Government FunctionDirectorate General of Regional Autonomy

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

THE AUTHORITY UPON SEAPORTTHE AUTHORITY UPON SEAPORT

1. UNDER LAW 32/2004 THERE ARE THREE CRITERIA IS SET TO DETERMINE THE AUTHORITY TO MANAGE SEAPORT; EXTERNALITY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND EFFICIENCY

2. INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL SEAPORT: THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

3. REGIONAL SEAPORT; PROVINCE

4. LOCAL SEAPORT; CITY OR DISTRICT

DISTRIBUTION OF GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY

DEKONSENTRASIPEMERINTAH

ADMINISTRATIF / WILAYAH

• KANWIL/KANDEP• KEPALA WILAYAH• DLL

PEMERINTAH PUSAT

DELEGASI

• OTORITA• BUMN• NUSAKAMBANGAN• DLL

DAERAH OTONOM

PROPINSIKABUPATEN/KOTA

DESENTRALISASI

PRIVATISASI

• SWASTA MURNI• BOT• BOO• BOL• DLL

WHETHER LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS WHETHER LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS ALLOWED TO MANAGE NATIONAL OR ALLOWED TO MANAGE NATIONAL OR

INTERNATIONAL SEAPORTINTERNATIONAL SEAPORT1. YES….. PROVIDED:2. THE LG SHOULD GET THE APPROVAL FROM THE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT (MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION) SINCE IT IS THE AUTHORITY OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

3. THE LG SHOULD FOLLOW NORMS, STANDARD AND PROCEDURES SET BY THE CENTRE INCLUDING CONVENTIONS SET BY THE IMO

4. THE LG HAS THE MANAGEMENT ABILITY TO MANAGE THE SEAPORT ACCORDING TO STANDARDS SET BY THE CENTRAL GOVT

LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT RELATIONS WITH PT.PELINDORELATIONS WITH PT.PELINDO

1. PT.PELINDO IS A STATE OWNED COMPANY2. IT IS TREATED AS A PRIVATE COMPANY UNDER

LAW 1/19953. SINCE IT OPERATES IN THE TERRITORY OF LG,

IT SHOULD OBEY LOCAL REGULATIONS SET BY THE LG UNDER LAW 32/2004

4. PT.PELINDO SHOULD GET LICENSES FROM THE LG WHEN IT ESTABLISHES BUILDINGS, ADVERTASIMENTS, RESTAURANTS, PARKING LOTS, AND OTHER LOCAL FACILITIES WHICH CAUSE LOCAL EXTERNALITIES

HOW THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT HOW THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT HANDLES THE SEAPORTHANDLES THE SEAPORT

1. THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT MAY ESTABLISH AN IMPLEMENTATION UNIT (UPT) TO HANDLE THE PORT

2. THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT MAY ASSIGN THE GOVERNOR TO HANDLE IT UNDER THE PRINCIPLE OF DECONCENTRATION

3. THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT MAY ASSIGN THE PROVINCE OR THE DISTRICT OR CITY TO HANDLE IT UNDER THE PRINCIPLE OF COADMINISTRATION (TUGAS PEMBANTUAN)

HANDLING NATIONAL AND HANDLING NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL SEAPORTS INTERNATIONAL SEAPORTS

1. TODAY IS THE ERA OF REFORMATION2. DEMOCRACY IS THE MAIN AGENDA OF REFORMATION

AND THE REGIONAL AUTONOMY IS THE REFLECTION OF DEMOCRACY

3. THOUGH THE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL PORTS BECOME THE AUTHORITY OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT TO HANDLE; IT WOULD BE WISER IF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO HANDLE THEM UNDER THE PRINCIPLE OF DECONCENTRATION OR COADMINISTRATION

4. EMPOWER AND SUPERVISE THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN HANDLING THE SEAPORTS

5. PRIORITIES SHOULD BE GIVEN TO BIG CITIES

CONDITIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO CONDITIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO HANDLE SEAPORTSHANDLE SEAPORTS

1. CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SET NORMS, STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES INCLUDING COMPETENCES IN HANDLING THE SEAPORT

2. THE LGs WANT TO HANDLE SEAPORTS SHOULD MET THE REQUIRED CONDITIONS

3. APPLY TIGHT SUPERVISION AND EMPOWER THE CAPACITY OF LGs IN HANDLING THE PORTS

4. LGs HAVE NOT MET THE CONDITIONS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO HANDLE PORTS AS IT MAY ENDANGER NATIONAL CREDIBILITY IN IMO

5. DECENTRALISATION IN HANDLING THE PORTS WILL EASE THE BURDEN OF THE CENTRE AND TEACHING THE LGs TO HANDLE BIGGER PORTS

CONSEQUENCES OF LOCAL CONSEQUENCES OF LOCAL AUTONOMYAUTONOMY

1. THE NEED TO HARMONIZE LAW OF COMMUNICATION AND LAW OF AUTONOMY

2. SINCE IT IS THE ERA OF REFORMATION; THE AUTONOMY LAW BECOMES THE CORNERSTONE FOR THE SECTORAL LAWS

3. THE MAIN DUTY OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT WILL BE; SETTING NORMS, STANDARDS, PROCEDURES, MONEV, SUPERVISION AND FACILITATION INCLUDING IMPLEMENTING GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS WITH NATIONAL EXTERNALITIES

4. THE FUNCTIONS OF LGs WILL BE; IMPLEMENTING GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS WITH LOCAL EXTERNALITIES WITHIN THE CORRIDOR OF REGULATIONS SET BY THE CENTRE

ANATOMI URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN

URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN

ABSOLUT (Mutlak urusan Pusat)

CONCURRENT(Urusan bersama

Pusat, Provinsi, dan Kab/Kota)

PILIHAN/OPTIONAL(Sektor Unggulan)

WAJIB/OBLIGATORY(Pelayanan Dasar)

SPM(Standar Pelayanan Minimal)

- Hankam

- Moneter

- Yustisi

- Politik Luar Negeri

- Agama

Contoh: kesehatan,pendidikan, lingkunganhidup, pekerjaan umum,dan perhubungan

Contoh: pertanian,industri, perdagangan,pariwisata, kelautan dsb

DISTRIBUSI URUSAN PEMERINTAHANANTAR TINGKAT PEMERINTAHAN

Kriteria Distribusi Urusan Pmerintahan Antar Tingkat Pemerintahan :

1. Externalitas (Spill-over)

Siapa kena dampak, mereka yang berwenang mengurus

2. Akuntabilitas

Yang berwenang mengurus adalah tingkatan pemerintahan yangpaling dekat dengan dampak tersebut (sesuai prinsip demokrasi)

3. Efisiensi

Otonomi Daerah harus mampu menciptakan pelayanan publik yangefisien dan mencegah High Cost Economy

Efisiensi dicapai melalui skala ekonomis (economic of scale)pelayanan publik

Skala ekonomis dapat dicapai melalui cakupan pelayanan (catchment area) yang optimal

1. Pusat: Berwenang membuat norma-norma, standar, prosedur, Monev, supervisi, fasilitasi dan urusan-urusan pemerintahan dengan eksternalitas nasional.

2. Provinsi: Berwenang mengatur dan mengurus urusan-urusan pemerintahan dengan eksternalitas regional (lintas Kab/Kota)

3. Kab/Kota: Berwenang mengatur dan mengurus urusan-urusan pemerintahan dengan eksternalitas lokal (dalam satu Kab/Kota)

BAGIAN URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN YANG DILAKSANAKAN BAGIAN URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN YANG DILAKSANAKAN OLEH MASINGOLEH MASING--MASING TINGKATAN PEMERINTAHAN MASING TINGKATAN PEMERINTAHAN

BERDASARKAN 3 KRITERIABERDASARKAN 3 KRITERIA

Hubungan Antar Tingkatan Hubungan Antar Tingkatan PemerintahanPemerintahan

1. Adanya interkoneksi dan interdependensi antar tingkatan Pemerintahan dalam mengatur dan mengurus urusannya.

Ada hubungan interelasi dan

interdependensi

Contoh 1: Urusan Pendidikan Dasar & SLTP

Kab/KotaUrusan Pendidikan Menengah oleh ProvinsiUrusan PT oleh Pemerintah Pusat

Contoh 2: Jalan Kab/Kota oleh

Pemkab/KotaJalan Prov oleh PemprovJalan negara oleh Pem. Pusat

Ada hubungan interelasi dan

interdependensi

TERIMA KASIHTERIMA KASIH