Kentuckys Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
11
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
-
Upload
willis-douglas -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
0
description
PROGRESS TO DATE: IMPLEMENTATION CYCLE Steering Committees (Provide initial and on- going guidance) Integrated Design Team (incorporates Steering Committee guidance into documents) District Focus Groups (review individual components) Regional Focus Groups (consolidate district input for Steering Committee feedback) Integrated Design Team (incorporates field guidance into documents) The feedback loop provides local districts and Steering Committee members opportunity to inform the work at each stage of the process.
Transcript of Kentuckys Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Kentucky’s Professional
Growth and Effectiveness
System
KENTUCKY’S COMMITMENT
To change how teachers and administrators are evaluated.To change how they are supported to: Continuously improve their professional practice; Enhance their effectiveness; and Drive increasingly high levels of student achievement.
PROGRESS TO DATE:
IMPLEMENTATION CYCLE
Steering Committees
(Provide initial and on-going guidance)
Integrated Design Team(incorporates
Steering Committee guidance into documents)
District Focus Groups
(review individual
components)
Regional Focus Groups
(consolidate district input for Steering
Committee feedback)
Integrated Design Team(incorporates field guidance
into documents)
The feedback loop provides local districts and
Steering Committee members
opportunity to inform the work at each stage of the
process.
CONSTRUCTION UNDERWAYThree Year
Process of System
Redesign Teacher and Principal
Effectiveness Steering
CommitteesIntegrated Design Team Synthesizes Field and Steering
Committee Feedback
Framework Design 2010 –
2011
( 25 Districts)
Field Testing
2011-2012
(50+ Districts)
State-wide Pilot
2012 - 2013
Full State Implementation
2013 - 2014
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER
EFFECTIVENESS
Teacher Effectiveness Framework
Observation
Peer Observatio
nProfessiona
l Growth
Self Reflection
Student Voice
Parent Voice
Student Growth
All multiple measures are
supported through
artifacts and evidence.
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR PRINCIPAL
EFFECTIVENESS
Principal Effectiveness Framework
Observation
Professional Growth
Self Reflection
Student Voice
Parent Voice
Student Growth
All multiple measures are
supported through
artifacts and evidence.
Teacher Reflection
ValEd 360
Comments: (Provide brief comments to support the holistic recommendation.)
DOMAIN STANDARD PEROFRMANCE LEVELS
EFFECTIVENESS FRAMEWORKS
EFFECTIVENESS FRAMEWORK DOMAINS
The domains for both teacher and principal effectiveness frameworks are the same:
InstructionLearning ClimateLeadership and ProfessionalismStudent Growth
EFFECTIVENESS FRAMEWORK STANDARDS
The standards for teacher and principal effectiveness are different:
Teacher standards are based on the Kentucky Teacher Standards and are aligned with the characteristics of highly effective teaching and learning.Principal standards are based on ISLLC; The Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium Standards
K L A ACCELERATED! CONNECTIONS
Thinking in the context of the individual professional learning communities (classroom, school, district) in which you work daily, what connections do you see to your existing effectiveness initiatives and the teacher and/or principal effectiveness framework(s)? What implications do those connections have for your classroom, school or district?
MAKING A DIFFERENCE IN KENTUCKY!
