KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

download KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

of 27

Transcript of KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    1/27

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1

    CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 2

    CAPE TOWN AND THE CONTEMPORARY YOUTH EXPERIENCE 3

    PROJECT DESCRIPTION 6

    LAVENDER HILL,CAPE TOWN,WESTERN CAPE MAP 9

    FRAMEWORK,DEFINITIONS, AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT 10

    CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 11

    CRIMINALITY AND GANG ACTIVITY:AN ECONOMICS BASED APPROACH 12

    CRIMINALITY AND GANG ACTIVITY:ASOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE 15

    THE SCHOOL-GANG NEXUS:AHYBRID APPROACH TO CRIMINALITY 20

    METHODOLOGY 25

    CHAPTER 3: ILLICIT ENTERPRISE IN THE COLOURED COMMUNITY 30

    ABRIEF HISTORY OF THE COLOURED EXPERIENCE 32

    COLOURED STEREOTYPING AND THE EMERGENCE OF AN ILLICIT ECONOMY 39

    THE RISE OF THE STREET GANG 44

    CHAPTER 4: URBAN GEOGRAPHY AND SPATIAL OWNERSHIP ON THE CAPE FLATS 46

    AHISTORY OF URBAN SPATIAL PLANNING AND APARTHEID SEPARATENESS 47

    SOCIAL ENGINEERING AND URBAN DISASTER 51

    NAVIGATING THE CAPE FLATS:THE DESTRUCTION OF THE COLOURED COMMUNITY 58

    SOCIO-SPATIAL PLANNING AND THE BREAKDOWN OF SOCIAL CAPITAL 61

    CHAPTER 5: THE SCHOOL-GANG NEXUS: THE EMERGENT ROLE OF THE SCHOOL 74

    SCHOOLING IN SOUTH AFRICA AND THE PERSISTENCE OF FAILURE 75

    THE EMERGENT ROLE OF THE SCHOOL:EXPLORATION AND INQUIRY 83

    LAVENDER HILL AND THE SCHOOLING CRISIS 85

    THE FAILING SCHOOL IN CONTEXT 88

    SCHOOLING DEMOCRACY AND A CONTESTED HISTORY 95

    CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION 102

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    2/27

    As my grade seven learners entered the library and tooktheir seats, I began Alright

    everyone. Today, we will be working on community maps. Whats a community map, Uncle

    Keith? Moustaquim shouted out. Thats a good question I replied. We will each draw a

    map of where we live. Here, I brought in an example. This is my community map of where I

    live, inAstoria. Its in Queens,New York. Let me see...I want to see it! the learners shouted

    as they stood on tipped toes to catch a glimpse of where I was from. Alright, I interrupted. I

    will pass my community map around so everyone can get a look. What is important is that when

    drawing your community map you include important places, like where you live and where you

    go to schoolIf you notice the check mark next to a place means that is a safe place and the X

    means that is a dangerous placeUncle Keith, I think the school is the only check mark in

    Lavender Hill, Moustaquim retorted, signaling an eruption of giggles from his classmates.

    As the students passed around my map they became enchanted by the large community

    park, the public library, the subway that affords the citys inhabitants quick and easy access to

    the hustle and bustle of Manhattan. As the learners gazed in awe and giggled in delight, a

    learner named Jade called out for my attention. Uncle Keith, is this a picture of Astoria? Its

    beautiful. As I turned around to see what Jade and the crowd of students around my desk were

    looking at, I was startled at the image before me. This is my folder from the University of Cape

    Town. This is a picture of Table Mountain. Itsonly 30 minutes away from here by car! Are

    you sure Uncle Keith? Jade dubiously replied as the learners again burst into laughter. Yes I

    am sure, Jade.How many of you have been to Table Mountain? I asked. As I surveyed the

    room, astonishingly, not one of the twenty-seven learners in the room raised a hand. Well, I

    continued, how many of you have been outside of Lavender Hill? At this only a handful of

    students proudly darted their hands high into the air, suggesting the great power in this

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    3/27

    seemingly insignificant feat. Well I promise this is a picture of Table Mountain. Here, I will

    prove it to you I signaled.Everyone up, please. Now we need to be quiet, but lets go. Hurry

    up! The learners arranged themselves in a neat line, excited by the challenge Jade laid out

    before me. Now everyone, look out over there, I directed, as I pointed beyond the neatly

    scattered project style-buildings called courts that most of my students call home. That is just

    the courts, Uncle Keith Jade replied. No Jade. Look out further behindthe courts. What do

    you see now? Is that the mountain? she asked. Yes that is Table Mountain! I exclaimed.

    That is the one that is on my folder! Wow she replied, I never noticed that there before.

    Alright, everyone, lets go back inside, I advised. As the learners filed inside Jade stood

    firmly in her place staring out into the distance at the mountain that peers over the entirety of the

    city. Lets go, Jade. Come inside. One more second, UncleKeith, she replied as she fully

    took in her surroundings and the isolation of her community; the mountain acting as a physical

    buffer between Lavender Hill and the greater city of Cape Town, a physical representation of the

    legacies of apartheid separateness that reinforce her perceived victimhood and seclusion in the

    present. Ok, I am ready to come inside, she sighed. A tear visibly rolled down her cheek.

    A History of Urban Spatial Planning and Apartheid Separateness

    In the chapter that follows I contextualize the rise of the contemporary street gang and a

    thriving illicit economy in relation to urban spatial planning under apartheid. In alignment with

    the hybrid approach to understanding criminality and gang participation, this chapter links racial

    division and separateness under apartheid with the persistence of poverty and widespread gang

    activity on the Cape Flats in the present. Today, just as in the past, urban geography on the Cape

    Flats limits economic opportunity as inhabitants are separated from the city center of Cape Town

    and simultaneously fosters isolation and inhibits the development of social capital necessary to

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    4/27

    establish a strong sense of community. Within this setting, the gang emerges as a viable means

    to generate social inclusion among socially excluded members.

    Although apartheid is often construed as a largely political construct, architecture and

    spatial planning were critical to the implementation of white minority hegemony. Prior to the

    Group Areas Act, the boundaries dividing black and white, rich and poor, were porous and

    haphazard. Tens of thousands of the citys coloured and black-African populations lived at the

    foot of Table Mountain, crammed into dense pockets of the inner city and the suburbs. There

    was the old neighborhood of District Sixwhich is of particular importance to this paper

    inland from the harbor, and the Malay district of Bo Kaap, on the slopes of Signal Hill. The

    bands of suburbs stretching south of Cape Town were largely white, but pockets of coloured

    peopleboth middle class and poorwere scattered throughout the city. Particularly in

    suburban areas, it was not unusual to find a white middle class street, neatly lined with homes

    with pretty gardens and primed hedges, adjacent to a densely packed coloured working-class

    block (Steinberg, 2004).i

    At the heart of the apartheid policy, however, was consolidating the spatial separation of

    races. This project, perhaps above all others, represented the cruelest policy towards the

    coloured population, one that still invokes condemnation today. The Group Areas Act, however,

    was not a policy that apartheid urban city planners imagined in 1948. Plans to reconfigure Cape

    Town so that inner-city slums could make way for bourgeoisie real estate had been considered

    for many years prior to apartheid.

    Planners of South African cities drew inspiration from the radical modernism of Le

    Corbusiers Surgical Method in their attempts to radically reconfigure the urban landscape to

    preserve white sacred space (Bekker & Leilde, 2006).ii They shared in Le Corbusiers faith in

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    5/27

    rationally conceived master plans and urban designs intended to create social order through the

    proper zoning of land use and the segregation of different social groups. For the architects of

    apartheid, upholding the perceived sacredness of white inner city space required the distancing of

    non-whites from whites, for the Coloureds especially remind[ed] the Whites of what some of

    the Whites irrationally fear[ed] they might become, if distance and separation are not maintained

    by institutionalizationthus all non-white and mixed space near the city centre must be

    expunged (Western, 1981).iii

    In the name of social order and racial separateness, South African

    urbanplanners appropriated Le Corbusiers notion of planning as a rational, technical process

    that could be divorced from politics. At the 1938 Town Planning Congress in Johannesburg,

    urban planner Norman Hansons remarked,

    It is possible to achieve this radical reorganization by drastic methods only, by a

    fresh start on cleared ground. This ruthless eradication [presumably of non-white

    peoples from the city center] directed towards a revitalizing process we have, following

    Le Corbusiers lead, named the Surgical Methodthrough surgery we must create order,

    through organization we must make manifest the spirit of a new age (Hanson, 1936)iv

    This utopian faith in the capacity to dramatically transform disorderly urban

    environments reflects the thinking of influential planners and architects dating back to Baron

    Haussmanns mid-nineteenth century renovation of Paris, and Ebenezer Howards Garden

    Cities(Western). Such ideas emerged in the nineteenth century in response to the problems of

    social disorder and threats to public health that came to be associated with the working class

    neighborhoods of British Victorian industrial cities. These planning interventions all operated

    under the assumption that it was possible to radically redesign the built environment in ways that

    improved the social fabric of dysfunctional communities and neighborhoods (Western). In

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    6/27

    other words, they upheld that spatial relations contribute significantly to the molding of social

    relations. Such is the focus of this chapter: how urban geography under apartheid has affected

    social cohesion and gang prevalence in the present.

    Ultimately, the fate of Cape Towns coloured population was inspired by the Garden

    City. The Garden City concept emerged in late-nineteenth-century England, a society which,

    like mid-twentieth century South Africa, wondered what to do with its workers and its industry

    so as to preserve inner city space. Ebenezer Howard promoted moving workers and industry

    from the city center into self-contained satellite towns on the urban periphery. Under such

    planning, young working class men were to grow up in quaint, quasi-rural clusters, surrounded

    by lush meadows, vast stretches of common land, and farms. Within the South African context,

    the Garden City model required that coloured people in the city center be moved to the

    countryside.

    Although Prime Minister Hendrik Verwoerd emphasized the altruism behind plans to

    enhance coloured community development and urban renewal, the Group Areas Act is better

    understood as a vehicle for urban removal and mass displacement. In fact, there were ulterior

    and profound motives for institutionalizing racialized group areas than the Prime Minister chose

    to advance publicly. Most importantly, the outnumbering of whites by non-white populations

    throughout the country, but particularly in cities, fed white anxiety and fear of overthrow by the

    coloured and black-African majority.

    District Six, as a well understood coloured space with a ninety-five percent coloured

    population immediately adjacent to the white city center, posed a physical and ideological threat

    to minority white control of the city. The design and location of the coloured and black-African

    townships, therefore, were conceived and planned on the basis of strategic considerations.

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    7/27

    Within a short time such a location [a Township area] could be cordoned off, and in its open

    streets any resistance could be easily smashed (Western). On a strategic level, placing coloured

    and black-African people in separate and large communities outside of the city meant they could

    be easily contained and controlled, particularly in the event of political disorder. Indeed,

    residential areas on the Cape Flats were designed in such a way as to limit the number of points

    of exit and entry, meaning inhabitants of township areas could be easily policed and cordoned

    off. In contrast, the old slum areas of Cape Town were considered major military hazards

    (Smith). In this sense, the designation of space physically distant from the urban city center and

    planned so as to prevent non-white community organization would prove beneficial to white

    hegemonic domination at the expense of non-white community development.

    There were other sinister motives to the process of racial segregation. On an economic

    level, forced removals gave many white property owners access to prime real estate for a fraction

    of its real cost. Within a short period of time, dilapidated slums that were considered a health

    hazard for coloureds and too costly to renovate were gentrified for new white owners. For the

    displaced, economic opportunity and access to the legal marketplace became restricteda

    majority of the displaced lost their homes and their livelihoods (Western).

    Essentialto the Group Areas Act was the National partys firm belief that a mixing of

    races was undesirable and that racially homogenous neighborhoods resulted in collective

    goodfor both whites and non-whites (Smith, 1992).v

    This fundamental belief that segregation

    served the collective interest stemmed from a firm conviction that any contact between differing

    races inevitably produces conflict. Accordingly, Minister of the Interior Dr. T. E. Tonges,

    introducing the group areas bill to Parliament on June 14, 1950, stated:

    Now this, as I say, is designed to eliminate the friction between the races in the

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    8/27

    Union because we believe, and believe strongly, that points of contactall

    unnecessary points of contactbetween the races must be avoided. If you

    reduce the number of points of contact to a minimum, you reduce the possibility

    of frictionthe result of putting people of different races together is to cause racial

    trouble. (Western).

    It is in this light that we can understand the motivations behind the wholesale clearance

    of Cape Towns District Six. Generations of coloured occupancy made it a cultural symbol for

    the coloured people; but, with its proclamation as a group area for whites only, coloured homes

    and sites of memory were demolished.

    Social Engineering and Urban Disaster

    When the Group Areas Act became law in 1950, the members of the Durban City

    Councils Technicalcity planningSubcommittee cooperated fully with the central

    government and presented their first report in November 1951 (Western). In this comprehensive

    report, they offered seven principleslogical derivatives of British-style city planning of the

    timewhereby a segregated pattern might be achieved:

    1. A residential race zone should:a. have boundaries which should as far as possible constitute barriers of a kind

    preventing or discouraging contact between races in neighbouring residential

    zones;

    b. have direct access to working areas and to such amenities as are used by allraces, so that its residents do not have to traverse the residential areas of another

    race, or do so only by rail

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    9/27

    c. be large enough to develop into an area of full or partial self-government or besubstantially contiguous to such an area;

    d. provide appropriate land for all economic and social classes which are present inthe race group concerned, or may be expected to emerge in the course of time;

    and for group institutions, suburban shopping, minor industry, and recreation;

    e. be so sited that the means of transport most suitable for the group concerned is orcan be made available.

    2. The number of race zones not contiguous to zones occupied by the same race must bekept as low as possible [racial homogeneity]

    3. In order to give the maximum length of common boundary between working areas andresidential zone, and thus reduce transport costs and difficulties, dispersal of industry in

    ribbon formation where practicable is preferable to the massing of industry in great

    blocks.

    4. In planning areas for each race group, the present and future requirements of the group[pre-determined by the white minority] in relation to other groups, must be determining

    factors; the extent of situation of land presently owned, occupied or otherwise allocated

    to that group [such as District Six] is not a material consideration.

    5. Settled racially homogenous communities should not be disturbed except in so far as it isnecessary to give effect to the postulates set out above [the preserve sacred white urban

    space]

    6. Different race groups may have differing needs in respect of building and sitedevelopment. In allocating zones to each race, due account must be taken of the

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    10/27

    topographical suitability of the land and of the extent to which the race group concerned

    can effectively utilize existing sites and building development.

    7. The central business area and the existing or potential industrial areas should not, in theinitial stages, be earmarked for the exclusive use of any [one] race. (Western)

    These seven principles of Durban widely contributed to the planning of Group Areas

    legislation for the country as a whole. Within this structure, whites were assumed to have the

    first choice of strategic location within the city. The western and more elevated slopes of the city

    were thus reserved for white residential areas. This particular landholding had a threefold

    function: strategic physical defensibility, psychological domination from an overlooking height,

    and residential amenity (Western). Industry, similarly, was placed in accordance with principles

    1(b) and 3, thereby separating industrial zones along racial lines and constricting economic

    opportunity by geographic displacement. The assumed intermediary position of the coloured

    population, between the polarized white and black-African racial groups, furthermore, required

    that the coloured group areas form an unbroken barrier between white and black-African land

    areas. Nevertheless, the meticulous detail of apartheid madness failed to translate into successful

    execution in terms of meeting the promises of Group Areas legislation to non-white populations,

    supposing the legal guaranteeslike the non-disturbance of racially homogenous communities

    like District Sixwere ever intended to be upheld.

    In Outcast Cape Town, John Western describes the symbiosis of social relations

    and the physical spaces in which they preside: society mirrors space and space mirrors

    society. This notion reflects apartheid processes of social engineering, wherein urban

    planners reengineered South Africas physical landscape with the objective of creating a

    utopian society of racial separation. The Group Areas Act of 1950 authorized the State

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    11/27

    to destroy neighborhoods and forcibly remove communities for the construction of an

    entirely segregated landscape. Group areas remolded society by deliberately

    manipulating spaces along racial lines. The legacy of those spatial arrangements continues to

    shape life after apartheid, the result of which has contributed greatly to a breakdown of coloured

    community and social capital, an absence of economic opportunity, and a prevalence of gang

    activity.

    In addition, Western outlines the failed implementation of the Durban principles in Cape

    Town group areas. He asserts that whites claimed an extraproportional amount of space

    available for their low-density residential use, resulting in widespread urban sprawl and

    overcrowding in non-white areas. Partly because the Group Areas Act was a contested policy,

    even among white civil servants, and partly because building new accommodation was a slow

    process, forced removals took several decades to be fully realized. Each year between the late

    1960s and the early 1980s, an average of 3,000 coloured families were resettled (Smith). In sum,

    by 1982 official statistics indicate that over 50,000 families had been displaced. The last of the

    8,000 remaining families living in District Six were forcibly removed in the mid 1970s and it

    was only then that the buildings of District Six were razed (Smith); an act that consolidated

    District Six into a profound symbol of coloured peoples lost past.

    The housing shortage that slowed the process of coloured community development

    reached crisis proportions in the mid 1970s. In 1974, the government estimated that the shortage

    was roughly 40,000 houses, although several thousand homes remained unoccupied in white

    allocated areas (Standing). The government linked this shortage with an exceptionally high

    coloured population rate and the continuing migration of poor laborers to the proclaimed white

    city. In their attempts to speed up the provision of housing, the authorities were accused of

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    12/27

    cutting corners and stretching already inadequate funds. As a result, displaced coloured

    people90% of whom either rented or bought state accommodationwere offered housing in

    shoddy buildings known as courts, or two story project-style buildings in township

    communities (Standing). Much to the dismay of their new inhabits, many court buildings were

    in a state of disrepair almost immediately after they were declared fit for habitation (Standing).

    Properties in poorer areas were crammed with extended families of several generations. Those

    who fell behind in their rent or who were waiting for new accommodation added to a growing

    number of illegal squatters. Such was the experience of a local mother living in an informal

    settlement in Lavender Hill. She recalls, When my mother and I were moved here we couldnt

    pay the rent so we had to leave. There was no one to help usit was terrible. Her experience,

    however, echoes just one of the some 30,000 coloured squatter huts registered in 1980 with the

    authoritiesmany others existed and continue to exist without formal registration (Horner,

    1983).vi

    The apartheid government made little attempt to provide community infrastructure in the

    new housing estates on the Cape Flats. A summary report of the Theron Commissionwhich

    which sought to report on the coloured condition after the Group Areas Act was enacted

    published in 1976, painted a very stark picture:

    While Dr. H. F. Verwoerd had preferred the name Community Development to

    Housing, because he favoured the building of healthy communities and not simply

    the provision of housing, unfortunately, very little attention had been paid to this aspect.

    In the majority of coloured communities, which had for years formed part of white

    towns or cities, it was very noticeable that besides one or more churches and schools

    there were usually no facilities available for convivial communication and relaxation.

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    13/27

    One witness declared; the only convivial gathering place in our community is the

    shebeen. The [Commission] pointed out that the streets were for the most part not

    attended to; there were no proper pavements; street lighting was absent, widely spread

    or ineffective; trees or other plant growth were not to be seen; open spaces meant to be

    playgrounds were used for dumping rubbish and have become locals for gang activity;

    rubbish and night soil removal was sporadicThe result was, that in spite of the

    reasonably good houses which were sometimes erected, the area presented a dismal

    appearance (Theron Commission, 1976).vii

    Perhaps most damaging of all to the coloured population, the Theron Commission

    indicated white recognition of the historic association between the coloured people and District

    Six, despite the governments decision to enact massive forced removal. Such recognition is also

    found in the city councils naming of new coloured townships on the Cape Flats after District Six

    locales. The obliteration of District Six and the subsequent displacement of coloured people to

    the vast expanse of scrubland and sand dunes in the citys hinterland, leaves an aching lacuna in

    self-concept and self-esteem within the coloured community today. With no significant

    infrastructural investment in coloured townships in the post-apartheid state, many, such as

    Lavender Hill, maintain theirdismal appearance, reinforcing the social displacement of its

    inhabitants.

    White South African culture, much like middle-class American culture of the time,

    idealized the values of self-reliance, hard work, sobriety, and sacrifice. Adherence to these

    principles was widely believed to bring monetary reward and economic advancement in society

    (Kluegel & Smith, 1986).viii

    Among men, adherence to these values meant that employment and

    financial security should precede marriage, and among women they implied that childbearing

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    14/27

    should occur only after adequate means to support the raising of children had been secured,

    either through marriage or through employment. In this ideal world, everyone was hardworking,

    self-sufficient, and not a burden to fellow citizensthat is, all within racially classified zones.

    The isolated coloured community, however, struggled to conform to these idealized

    values as a result of township conditions. The supposed urban upgrading scheme of the Group

    Areas Act resulted in the creation of geographically isolated and racially homogenous

    neighborhoods where poverty is endemic, joblessness is rife, schools are poor, and even high

    school graduates are unlikely to speak standard English with any facility. Employment

    opportunities remain limited, and given the social isolation enforced by segregation, coloured

    men and women are not well connected to employers in the larger legalized economy. As a

    result, young men and women coming of age in township areas are relatively unlikely to find

    jobs capable of supporting a family. Faced with an absence of educational institutions capable of

    preparing them for gainful employment, they cannot realistically hope to conform to societal

    ideals of work.

    Similarly, the dismal conditions of the Cape Flats design have resulted in catastrophic

    consequences in the present: the breakdown of coloured community and the domination of

    gang violence.

    Navigating the Cape Flats: The Destruction of Coloured Community

    Community, arguably, has two salient features: first, the notion of community as

    acknowledgementliving in an area where people accept responsibility for one another, almost

    as a microcosm of the collective human experience, and second, the notion of community as

    territoryappropriating the familiar places that have become comfortable. They become a

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    15/27

    residents stamping ground, that is, his or her own space. The combination of these two qualities

    results in what philosopher John Daniel Wild (1963) calls fields of care.ix

    The physical and cultural destruction of the Group Areas Act eroded the conception of a

    coloured community. Today, perceptions of community in coloured townships resemble the

    antithesis of Wilds understanding of community, that is a field of care and support system that

    fosters self-efficacy and collective well-being. In fact, Lavender Hill is characterized by low

    levels of community trust and a harsh and violent social environment. A survey of forty youth in

    Lavender Hill between the ages of eleven and twenty-two indicates that youth generally feel no

    tie to colourednessand mark an absence of a coloured community in Lavender Hill despite its

    overwhelming coloured majority (Calix, 2012).x

    The survey required participants to identify

    their racial association among white, black, coloured, other or unsure, among which 5%

    identified as black, 55% identified as coloured, 7.5% as other and 32.5% identified as unsure.

    Regarding association with a community setting, among those surveyed, 52.5% of youth most

    associated with their court community, 27.5% at school, and 20% identified other, while 3

    learners qualified other with the name of a local gang group. Perhaps most telling, only 30% of

    youth polled felt a part of a Lavender Hill community, while 52.5% did not feel a part of a

    Lavender Hill community, and 17.5% were unsure. Similarly, a mere 10% polled felt proud to

    live in Lavender Hill while a whopping 75% of youth polled felt notably not proud and 15%

    were unsure. Finally, the sense of a lack of coloured community in Lavender Hill is similarly

    distributed. Among those polled 15% felt a sense of a coloured community in Lavender Hill

    while 67.5% marked its absence and 17.5% were unsure.

    These perceptions of weak community ties are echoed in the frustration with

    disconnectedness among older residents in Lavender Hill. A volunteer from the Department of

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    16/27

    Cultural Affairs and Sport vividly described the generational breakdown of coloured perceptions

    of coloured community:

    I was born in District Six and during my childhood I spent most of my time

    traveling from home to home once we were forced to move out. Because of that,

    it is difficult for me to call a place from a childhood home, but in District Six

    my family was most stable. Afterwe moved, the family structure I was so used to

    was completely torn apart. That was not unique to me though. So many of my friends

    had similar situations after they left District Six. You took the familiarity and community

    atmosphere that was largely celebrated for its diversity and of a particular place of

    home for the coloured community, there was a town hall which was used frequently,

    clubs, dancesso many things, and we were thrown into townships. That sense of

    community and family was completely torn apart. We all became fearful all of a sudden.

    We were moved to a place with no plans for employment, no places to gather. We were

    taken from a place of familiarity, culture and history and thrown into a place of desolation,

    fear, and anxiety. That is exactly what the apartheid government wanted though and it

    worked(Interview, 2012).xi

    In Lavender Hill today, one finds concentric layers of unpaved streets, turned in upon

    themselves, forming tight, hermetic circles, each surrounded by a barren wilderness of no-mans

    land. With some imagination, one can conceive some of the benign intentions behind the

    original Garden City idea. The notion of the inward-looking clustercourt style housingwas

    meant to foster a village-like sense of community among residents. Yet driving through

    Lavender Hill, one feels as if one is locked into a maze, as if the township is a dense universe, a

    ghetto that for young people like Jade, seem a world away from the center of the city. The idea

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    17/27

    of buttressing the clusters with greenbelts was intended to create open spaces in which the

    cluster-children would spend their afternoons. Despite this vision, the greenbelts of the Cape

    Flats are intraversable scrubland; the youth are locked inside this labyrinth of poverty and

    violence.

    Court-style housing design helps foster the mistrust and fear that characterizes life in

    Lavender Hill. Today one finds intense overcrowding in the courts. Combined with a general

    lack of a strong state presence and a prominence of gang activity, residents are concerned with

    the threat of physical attack. Therefore, fear of being physically accosted plays a central role in

    the dynamics of life in Lavender Hill. This fear, Jankowski finds, is intensified when people live

    in or near public housing complexes, or in areas where there are multiple apartment buildings.

    Such housing conditions accentuate population density, enhance social contact, and increase

    conflict (1991). Within these settings, gangs emerge as a viableand as some residents feel, the

    onlysource of protection. This does not mean that community members are antagonistic

    towards the police, though this is oftentimes the case; rather, members of the community feel

    that the gang has some advantages over the police.

    One particular perceived advantage of gangs relative to local police is conflict resolution

    among disputing residents. In fact, a Lavender Hill grandmother of three described how when

    there are problems here we dont go to the police. Where are they? I dont see them here. They

    are afraid. If something goes wrong, how do I find the police? There is no station in Lavender

    Hill. Its all the way in Steenberg. If I walk there, I walk through gangland. To walk to the

    police station I put myself and my family in greater danger. We are out here to fend for

    ourselves. When there is a problem, like if a person here thinks someone stole something from

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    18/27

    them, you take it to Joe [local gang leader]. He sorts things outhe knows how to get things

    done (Interview, 2012).xii

    This sense of community reliance on local gangs is only intensified by the relative lack of

    policing presence in the area. The Steenberg police station is responsible for serving Lavender

    Hill, Retreat and Cafda Village, Steenberg, and Heathfield, with a total population of about

    280,000 with eight policemen per shift. This means two officers operate patrol vans while the

    remaining six operate as personnel in the police station office (Roshan Samara, 2011).xiii

    According to a local Constable, policing in this area is a very difficult issue. People dont trust

    us because they are not familiar with uscrime happens all of the time but people do not report

    it. They are afraid of what will happen if they do, and a lot of them have lost faith in our ability

    to protect them. This is something we must changeat times my job feels impossible...many of

    these streets are unsafe (Constable, 2012).xiv

    Socio-Spatial Planning and the Breakdown of Social Capital

    Driving through Lavender Hill, one notes the emptiness of the streets and the debris that

    rolls along the unpaved sidewalks. In her indictment of urban spatial planning in the twentieth

    century, Jane Jacobs observes that streets and their sidewalks are the main public places within a

    city, akin to the most vital organs that power the human body (Jacobs, 1992).xv

    Similarly, Jacobs explores the three primary functions of sidewalks: safety, contact, and

    assimilating children. Street safety within communities is promoted by pavements clearly

    marking a public and private separation, and by spontaneous protection with the eyes of both

    pedestrians and those watching the continual flow of pedestrians from buildings. To make this

    eye protection effective at enhancing safety, there should be an unconscious assumption of

    general street support when necessary, or an element of community trust. As the main

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    19/27

    contact venue, pavements contribute to building trust among neighbors over time. She argues

    that such trust cannot be built in artificial public places such as a game room in a housing

    project. The presence of cultural centers, however, facilitates community trust and

    interdependence. For Jacobs, sidewalk contact and safety, together, thwart segregation and racial

    discrimination.

    Jacobs also suggests the importance of what is termed today social capital in keeping

    social order. She notes that the public peacethe sidewalk and street peaceof cities is not

    kept by police, necessary as police are. It is kept primarily by an intricate, almost unconscious,

    network of voluntary controls and standards among the people themselves, and enforced by the

    people themselves. Therefore, social networks between individuals in a community have power

    in that they increase levels of trust and cooperation which likely result in a collective benefit i.e.

    safety. In housing projects with high population turnover and few community spaces that

    facilitate resident interactionthereby decreasing the accumulation of intricate networks of

    voluntary controlsthe keeping of sidewalk law and order is left almost entirely to the police

    and special guards. In the absence of such a state presence, in areas like Lavender Hill, the gang

    emerges as both the primary source of violence and the principal provider of safety to residents.

    Notably absent from coloured townships are sport and recreational facilities that were

    most popular among coloured youth in Cape Town. For example, a number of cinemas that had

    been popular with coloured people closed down when areas were reclassified as either only for

    whites or only for coloureds. Cinemas before the Group Areas Act were considered the major

    focus of entertainment within the coloured community; therefore their absence in township areas

    was a significant loss for coloured recreation. For the coloured population, cinemas served as

    important vehicles that generated cultural capital and coloured consciousnesses (Standing,

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    20/27

    2003).xvi

    By the mid 1970s, however, there were only 20 cinemas that coloured people could

    attend in the entire region. The absence of such cultural centers contributed to a weakening of

    cultural capital and reflected a wider sentiment of disconnect from former institutions of cultural

    significance among coloured youth. In areas like Lavender Hill, the dilapidated public soccer

    pitch has become abattleground for gang violence, located directly across the street from the

    local Hillwood Primary School. The field intended to bring youth together has become a no-go

    zone for township residents, however, even those who avoid the pitch remain at risk. During my

    time working in Lavender Hill a grade 5 learner was shot while walking to school on the pitch.

    Community planners have long attempted to conceptualize strongly inclusive meeting

    places designed to foster face-to-face meetings and socio-economic welfare in a local areabe it

    in a city or in the countryside. Important roots for such centers can be found in the flourishing

    civic societies of the 19th century. For example, Putnam describes the establishment of a

    community lyceum in New Bedford, Massachusetts, in 1829. Its founder, Thomas Greene,

    formulated the purpose of such a large-scale local meeting place in the following way:

    We come from all divisions, ranks and classes of society to teach and to be

    taught in our turn. While we mingle together in these pursuits, we shall learn

    to know each other more intimately; we shall remove many of the prejudices

    which ignorance or partial acquaintance with each other had fostered (...) In

    the parties and sects into which we are divided, we sometimes learn to love

    our brother at the expense of him whom we do not in so many respects regard

    as a brother () We may return to our homes and firesides [from the lyceum]

    with kindlier feelings toward one another, because we have learned to know

    one another better (in Putnam, 2000: 23).xvii

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    21/27

    One of the founding fathers of social capital research, American sociologist James

    Coleman (1988), argues socio-spatial planning affects the generation of social capital. He finds

    that spatial planning affects preferences for social interaction which thereby affects perceptions

    of trust among residents within a community.xviii

    At the community level, lower levels of social

    interaction among residents breeds mistrust. Ghettos and urban sprawl do not tend to enhance

    mutual trust and widespread cooperation. Therefore, Coleman finds a causal relationship

    between the existence of cultural centers and social interaction. The increased number of regular

    face-to-face meetings also involves increased learning and the formation of human capital within

    the local community. Socially designed meeting places in the form of community centers

    (acting as town-country magnets, cf. Howard) are conducive to physical cohesion for they

    increase the regularity of face-to-face meetings among community residents, which again tends

    to foster widespread networking and social cohesion within the single local community. The

    positive externalities of such interaction can generate positive collective goods such as high-

    quality institutions like a well-functioning public school, lower levels of gang violence and

    participation (particularly among youth), and widespread cooperation between various

    professional, associational, social and age groups leading to high inter-group trust (i.e.

    generalized trust, cf. Rothstein & Uslaner 2005 and Uslaner 2008).xixxx

    xxi

    The absence of such

    spaces breeds greater levels of mistrust, paranoia and weakens bonds between community

    members. Such community disintegration characterizes community relations in Lavender Hill.

    Low perceptions of community trust and widespread sentiment of social and economic exclusion

    empower gang domination.

    Coleman also asserts that just as physical capital is created by changes in materials to

    form tools that facilitate production, human capital is created by changes in persons that bring

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    22/27

    about skills and capabilities that make them able to act in new ways. Social capital, however,

    comes about through changes in relations among persons that facilitate action. Therefore, while

    human capital is embodied in the skills and knowledge acquired by an individual, social capital

    is less tangible, for it exists in the relations among persons. High levels of social capital,

    Coleman argues, can enhance collective levels of human capital for greater community relations

    among residents can act as a facilitator of information exchange.

    Social capital, like physical and human capital, generates productive activity. For

    example, a group within which there is extensive trust is able to accomplish more than a

    comparable group without such trust and reliance. Therefore, the absence of community

    structures that facilitate these meaningful relationshipslike in Lavender Hilllimits levels of

    trust among residents, the production of social capital, and consequentially the collective spread

    of human capital within the community.

    Within this community contextcharacterized by social disorganization and low levels

    of social capitalthe gang emerges as a viable mechanism by which members can generate

    social inclusion: the gang member seeks formal recognition or respect within the community and

    a viable means to generate regular income. Nevertheless, it is within this environment that the

    gang functions as a generatorof negative social capital. Though the gang creates economic

    opportunity for its members in the illicit market and establishes relationships of community

    interdependence, it does so through coercion and domination. By increasing levels of fear and

    paranoia, which decrease levels of community trust, the gang enhances the reliance of the

    community on theirprotection and other services.

    Norms also constitute a powerful, though sometimes fragile, form of social capital. For

    example, a prescriptive norm within a community that constitutes a particularly important form

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    23/27

    of social capital is that one should forgo self-interest for the sake of the collectivity. For

    Coleman, a norm of this nature, reinforced by social support, status, honor and other rewards, is

    the social capital that builds young nationsstrengthens families by leading family members to

    act selflessly in the familys interest, facilitates the development of nascent social movements

    through a small group of dedicated, inward-looking, and mutually rewarding members, and in

    general leads persons to work for the public good (1988). Ultimately, norms of this sort are

    important in overcoming the public goods dilemma that exists within collectivities. The absence

    of such normative values can lead to a breakdown of community cooperation and trust, thereby

    enhancing conditions conducive to illicit activity.

    Normative social capital, however, not only facilitates certain actions; it constrains

    others. Norms that make it possible for people to walk alone at night also constrain the activities

    of criminals, for in the instance of the gang, it raises the probability of community retaliation

    against gang activity. In this sense, community trust, organization and mobilization would act as

    a check to attempts of gang dominationor the domination of any particular group for that

    matter. Though the existence of such norms and levels of community mobilization presuppose

    low levels of collective action costs, small community action has sometimes resulted in relative

    successeven in the gangland that is Lavender Hill. A local mother and volunteer in the

    community described that after her thirteen-year-old daughter was terrorized by members of a

    local gang and the police did not act, she gathered local grannies and whoever would come to

    make a fuss to approach the local gang leader at his safe-house. This impromptu rallying of

    local grandmothers, who are highly respected within the community, shocked them all. After

    describing the attack in detail to the gang leader, much to the dismay of the somewhat forty men

    that watched in surprise within the safe-house, the gang leader called upon the two men who had

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    24/27

    previously been described by the mother as the attackers. She vividly described what followed.

    He had the other men put soap in socks and then he ordered them to beat the two guys in front

    of me. All while the othergrannies waited outside to see what would happenthen he promised

    there would be no more problems with my daughternothing has happened to hersince

    (Interview, 2012).xxii

    In this instance, a local mother utilized normative values of respect

    towards grandmothers as bargaining power with a local gang leader. Though this interaction is

    highly uncommon, it produced meaningful results for the mother by constraining the actions of

    the local gang.

    Certain kinds of social structure, however, are especially important in facilitating

    normative behavior and certain forms of social capital. In Lavender Hill, like other coloured

    townships such as Manenberg and Mitchells Plain, the dizzying array of inward facing court-

    style housing creates a constricted and limited perception of the greater community. In fact, in

    Lavender Hill, courts are understood as turf belonging to particular gangsa young person must

    navigate these no-go zones to safeguard his/her own well-being. One false move can result in

    harassment, abuse, or even death. Within this constricted social environment, young people

    have limited interaction with peers, thereby weakening social ties and levels of mutual trust

    between different courts while increasing inner-court reliance and dependence. Not surprisingly,

    within this socially fragmented setting, one finds high levels of gang violence. In total, the

    provincial government estimates around 130 gangs with some 100,000 members currently

    operate within the Western Cape alone (The Economist, 2012).xxiii

    Life within a court is fraught with anxiety. A grade seven learner described court life in

    Lavender Hill. In addition to living with thirteen other immediate and extended family members,

    There isnt a lot of spaceyou cant go outside much because it isnt safe. In

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    25/27

    my court there are a lot of Funkies [members of the local Junky Funky Kids gang]

    I go to school and then I go straight home. You see, I have to change the way I walk

    to school and even when I come back because some guys try to recruit me for the

    gangs...the friends I have are all from my court. We travel to school together because

    it is saferfor me, I wake up scared, I go to school scared and when I leave I am

    scared. Life here is about the gangs. This is the way it is (Interview, 2012).xxiv

    Court-style living is characterized by crime, paranoia and mistrust. Due to the prevalence

    of gang activity and the particularly violent nature of gang turf warfare in Lavender Hill, the

    lives of children become constricted to a particular court. In a very real sense, because of the

    absence of safe public community spaces and limited contact with community members, life in

    another court resembles a different existence for a young person. Ones social reality is

    effectively confined to life in the court. In this sense the relationship of court-style housing and

    gang activity is both causal and consequential. Though the gang can exist outside of the courts,

    such design promotes community separation and generates community mistrust which weakens

    community bonds and social capital. As a consequence, the gang flourishes as a means by which

    members can generate meaningful relationships with fellow gang members.

    This narrow perception of reality and the effective division of the community along gang

    turf lines resembles what journalist Alex Kotlowitz terms narrow geographic horizons (1991).xxv

    Similar to Kotlowitz characterization of black children in project housing in Chicago, youth in

    Lavender Hill face high levels of isolation and alienation from the greater city of Cape Town,

    narrowing their perceptions of their own neighborhood. This narrow-minded perception of the

    community facilitates greater dependence on the gang. Within this constricted setting the gang

    becomes a viable mechanism by which a young person can widen his horizons: protection by the

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    26/27

    gang affords him greater territorial freedom and autonomy among his peers. A young sixth

    grade boy eagerly described, I want to join a gang for respect. Gangsters dont have to worry

    like we dothey dont have to worry when they walk aroundthey have protection (Interview,

    2012).xxvi

    Despite such division within Lavender Hill, the school stands out as an untapped

    generator of social capital within the greater community. As a potential generator of economic

    opportunity and facilitator of pro-social behavior, the school stands out as the only place within

    Lavender Hill where young people from different courts, gang turfs, and existences come

    together regularly under the same roof. The school, therefore, holds both a unique and strategic

    position within the community. Understanding the unique role the school plays within the

    coloured township setting fraught with widespread violence, mistrust, and fear can provide

    useful insights into exploring the role that the school can play in building social capital,

    generating human capital, and strengthening collective identity to potentially mitigate youth

    involvement in gangs. The following chapter explores this conceptualization of the school

    further.

    iSteinberg, J. (2004). The Number: One man's Search for Identity in the Cape Underworld and

    Prison Gangs. Jeppestown: Jonathan Ball Publishersii

    Bekker, S., & Leilde, A. (2006).Reflection on Identity in Four African Cities. Stellenbosch:

    African Minds.iii

    Western, J. (1981). Outcast Cape Town. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.iv

    Hanson in Pinnock, 1989; 156, cited in Jensen and Turner, 1996: 85.v

    Smith, D. (1992). The Apartheid City and Beyond: Urbanization and Social Change in South

    Africa. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.vi D Horner. 1983. Labour preference, influx control and squatters: Cape Town entering the

    1980s, SALDRU Working Paper 50, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit

    (SALDRU), Cape Town.vii

    S.A. Institute of Race Relations, (1976). South Africa. Commission of Inquiry into MattersRelating to the Coloured Population Group, South African Institute of Race Relations.viii

    James R. Kluegel and Elliot R. Smith,Beliefs about Inequality (New York: Adline de

    Gruyter, 1986).

  • 7/28/2019 KeithCalix_Writing Sample.pdf

    27/27

    ix

    Wild, J: 1963,Existence and the World of Freedom, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New

    Jersey.x

    Survey Conducted by Keith Calix [July, 2012].xi

    Volunteer from the Department of Cultural Affairs and Sport, interviewed by Keith Calix, 8

    June 2012.xii Local Mother, interviewed by Keith Calix 4, June 2012.xiii

    Roshan Samara, T. (2011). Cape Town after Apartheid: Crime and Governance in theDivided City. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.xiv

    Constable, Interviewed by Keith Calix 9, June 2012.xv

    Jacobs, J. (1992). The Life and Death of Great American Cities. New York City: VintageBooks.xvi

    Standing, A. (2003). The social contradictions of organized crime on the Cape Flats , South

    African Institute for Security Studies, ISS Paper 74.xvii

    Putnam, R.D. (2000) Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community.Simon & Schuster, New York.xviii

    Coleman, J.S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. AmericanJournal of Sociology 94, 95121.xix

    Rothstein, B. & E.M. Uslaner (2005) All for All: Equality and Social Trust. World

    Politics 58, 41-72xx

    Uslaner, E.M. (2006) Does diversity drive down trust? Working paper 2006.69.

    Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei: http://ideas.repec.org/p/fem/femwpa/2006.69.html(Date of access: 25-04-2007).xxi

    Uslaner, E.M. (2009a) Corruption, inequality, and trust. In: G.T. Svendsen & G.L.H.

    Svendsen (Eds.) Handbook of Social Capital. The Troika of Sociology, Political Science andEconomics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, USA. Forthcoming Spring

    2009.xxii

    Local Mother, Interviewed by Keith Calix, 8, June 2012.xxiii The Economist. (2012, August 11). Gang warfare. Retrieved fromhttp://www.economist.com/node/21560313xxiv

    Grade Seven Learner, Interviewed by Keith Calix 13, May, 2012.xxv

    Kotlowitz, A. (1991). There Are No Children Here. New York: First Anchor Books.xxvi

    Grade Six Learner, Interviewed by Keith Calix 13, May, 2012.