Keeping your Social Media and Other Online Campaigns on the Right Side of Intellectual Property...
Transcript of Keeping your Social Media and Other Online Campaigns on the Right Side of Intellectual Property...
Keeping your Social Media
and Other Online
Campaigns on the Right
Side of Intellectual Property
Law
1. Trademark Law
2. Copyright Law
3. Trade Laws
4. Privacy Laws
PART 1 - TRADEMARKS
Trademarks - Assets of a Business – Both as property and as
goodwill
- words (brands)
- slogans
- designs/icons
- product configuration
Potential Liability for Trademark Infringement
Trademarks Must Not be Confusingly Similar to Other Marks
Factors to consider: In re E.I. DuPont du Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973), some include:
A. visually, audibly, or phonetically similar?
B. are the goods/services related or competing?
B. trade channels overlap?
C. sophistication of consumers?
D. are there instances of actual confusion?
Federal Protection:
Protect against infringers who use
confusingly similar marks
Claim of Trademark Infringement 15 U.S.C. § § 1116 and 1117
(a) action can be in federal court for federally-registered
mark, they have original jurisdiction;
(b) relief available for trademark infringement:
(1) injunction;
(2) actual damages (including infringer’s profits);
(3) attorneys’ fees for exceptional cases; and
(3) destruction of infringing inventory.
Federal Protection Claim of Counterfeiting:
• a counterfeit (copy) of a mark that is registered on the
Principal Register in the United States Patent and
Trademark Office for such goods or services sold,
offered for sale, or distributed and that is in use,
whether or not the person against whom relief is
sought knew such mark was so registered…. 15
U.S.C. § 1116
• In addition to above remedies, may seek statutory
damages for up to $1 million
Federal Protection Claim of Dilution: 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)
• Even if a mark does not infringe another’s trademark (or is
not confusingly similar), a trademark owner may still have a
cause of action for the loss of the trademark’s ability to
clearly identify one source.
• requires proof that: (1) the mark is famous, (2) the defendant
is making use of the mark in commerce, (3) the defendant's
use of the mark began after the mark became famous, and
(4) the likelihood of dilution
Minimizing Potential Liability for Use of a
Trademark
SEARCHES help to determine whether the mark is available for
registration and use
– Federal searches [www.uspto.gov]
– State searches [secretaries of state] – not tasked with
searching or enforcement
– Domain Name searches
• Domaintools.com
• allwhois.com
– “Common Law” – internet, phone books, business names
– Proprietary Databases
Sponsored Advertising on Social Media Sites
• Pay per click (PPC) is used on websites, where advertisers
pay their host only when the ad is clicked. With search
engines, advertisers typically bid on keyword phrases relevant
to their target market. Content sites commonly charge a fixed
price per click rather than use a bidding system.
Sponsored Advertising • Is an advertiser legally liable for a wrong if they
purchase their competitor’s trademark as a
keyword for sponsored advertising?
– Case law goes both ways right now
– Trend: requires something more
– Guidelines: Avoiding using the competitor’s
trademark in the title of the advertisement, the
text of the advertisement, in the url (domain
name), and in any other way that creates
confusion
Fair Advertising Strategies/Using the
Trademark of Another
• Comparative Advertising
• Puffery
– America’s Favorite/Best v. America’s #1
• Best Practices
– Be truthful
– Don’t be literally true, but deceptively misleading
– Disclaimers
– Trademark notices
PART 2 – COPYRIGHT
OWNERSHIP
REQUIREMENTS FOR COPYRIGHT
PROTECTION
• Work of original creative authorship
• Fixed in a tangible form of expression from
which it can be perceived, reproduced, or
otherwise communicated, directly or with aid of a
device
• Format or medium of work is irrelevant
• Focus is on the creative expression
Copyrights • Copyrights exist upon creation
– Registration is not required
– Notice is not required
• Originality is all that is required – not specific length. Must contain minimum creative authorship
• The Copyright Act protects “original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression.” 17 U.S.C. § 102.
• Although some tweets are not eligible for copyright protection, some surely are “original.”
• RSS feeds are subject to copyright
protection
Duration of Copyright • individual authors for works created on or after 1/1/78:
life of author + 70 years.
• works made for hire created on or after 1/1/78:
95 years from publication or 120 years from
creation, whichever is shorter
• For works created prior to January 1, 1978, the duration
of copyright may vary depending upon when the work
was created and/or published.
Liability for Copyright Infringement
• Individuals are liable for their own actions
• Exposes employer or Contractor to liability
• Potential Damages
– Actual damages
– Injunction
– Statutory Damages
• Up to $30,000/infringing work
• Up to $150,000 for willful infringement of work
• Attorneys’ fees/legal expenses
Guidelines
Certain works are NOT protected by copyright law
• Works that are in the public domain unoriginal reprints of
public domain works
• U.S. Government Works
• 17 U.S.C.§ 105: Copyright protection under this title
is not available for any work of the United States
Government, but the United States Government is
not precluded from receiving and holding copyrights
transferred to it by assignment, bequest, or
otherwise.
Certain works are NOT protected by copyright law
•Facts and ideas
• While the protection does cover the particular, distinctive
words a writer uses to present ideas or facts, control over
the underlying concepts or truths cannot be owned. Thus, a
biography about a famous athlete qualifies for copyright,
but the events and facts of his life do not.
• Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.,
499 U.S. 340 (1991)data is not protected by copyright;
selection and arrangement of data can be protected by
copyright”
Certain works are NOT protected by copyright law
Works which have not been fixed in a tangible
form of expression
• Titles, names, short phrases, and slogans
• Mere listings of ingredients or contents
• Works consisting entirely of information that is
common property and which contains no original
authorship (e.g. height & weight charts, tape
measures, calendars, etc.
MANAGING LIABILITY WITH BLOGS, BULLETIN
BOARDS and OTHER AVENUES FOR
INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION
• The Digital Millennium Copyright Act provides a safe
harbor.
• But company must comply with DMCA procedures for
designation and registration of a “copyright agent” and
implementation of a “notice-and-takedown” regime.
• One jury awarded $32M against hosting company for
infringement by sites it hosted.
Best Practices
• Assume it is copyrighted. When in doubt (which
is probably most of the time) seek permission or
create something original
• If commenting or criticizing, only use as much as
necessary and make sure comment/criticism is
present
• When quoting, give attribution
Best Practices
• Do not copy photographs, drawings, videos, or
other visual works of art without permission
• When using stock photos, be sure the license
permits the intended use, i.e. commercial use
• Use original photos/drawings as much as
possible
• Do not merely reproduce a copyrighted
illustration
• Use federal government works when you can
Best Practices
• Wikipedia: “The Wikimedia Foundation does not
own copyright on Wikipedia article texts and
illustrations.” • “Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify
Wikipedia's text under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and, unless
otherwise noted, the GNU Free Documentation License.
unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or
back-cover texts. “
UNDERSTANDING COPYRIGHT IMPLICATIONS FROM
POSTING ON THE SITES OF OTHERS
The copyright owner may not retain control of material
posted to a social networking site such as Facebook
• “You own all of the content and information you post on
Facebook, and you can control how it is shared through your
privacy and application settings. In addition…you grant us a
non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free,
worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in
connection with Facebook ("IP License"). This IP License
ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless
your content has been shared with others, and they have not
deleted it.”
• Even though Facebook does not own copyright in users’
content, it may own copyright in users’ pages. Facebook Inc.
v. Power Ventures Inc., N.D. Cal., No. C 08-5780, 5/11/09).
• Gmail T & C: “By submitting, posting or displaying the content
you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide,
royalty‐free, and non‐exclusive license to reproduce, adapt,
modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display
and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display. .
.”
PART 3 – TRADE LAWS
Commercial Blogging • FTC Guidelines 10/5/09
– FTC Act - “material connections” (sometimes
payments or free products) between
advertisers and endorsers
– Applies to bloggers or other “word-of-mouth”
marketers
Commercial Blogging • While decisions will be reached on a case-by-
case basis, the post of a blogger who receives
cash or in-kind payment to review a product is
considered an endorsement. Bloggers who
make an endorsement must disclose the
material connections they share with the seller of
the product or service.
Commercial Blogging • If a company refers in an advertisement to the
findings of a research organization that
conducted research sponsored by the company,
the advertisement must disclose the connection
between the advertiser and the research
organization.
Social media posts are considered sponsored advertising
messages and are regulated by the FTC if they meet
certain conditions. When deciding if a post should be
considered an advertising message (an “endorsement”),
the FTC will look at whether the writer:
– is compensated (cash or in-kind) by the marketer or a
third party
– has an ongoing relationship with the marketer
– participates in a word of mouth marketing program
that provides products to review publicly
– receives similar products or services regularly, or
expects to in the future
• The FTC makes it clear that there are three things you
need to do to limit your liability:
1. Require disclosure and truthfulness in social media
outreach.
2. Monitor the conversation and correct misstatements.
3. Create social media policies and training programs.
Organizations must require disclosure and truthfulness
from anyone who participates in their social media
programs and train them how to do it.
“Advertisers are subject to liability for false or
unsubstantiated statements made through
endorsements, or for failing to disclose material
connections between themselves and their
endorsers.”
• Disclosure must be “clear and conspicuous” —
understandable to the “average consumer.” This has
always been the FTC standard.
• Many marketers miss a key concept in staying safe:
“Endorsements must reflect the honest opinions, findings,
beliefs, or experience of the endorser”.
This means that you should never ask bloggers to write a
post about a product they have not actually used.
“When the advertisement represents that the endorser
uses the endorsed product, the endorser must have been a
bona fide user of it at the time the endorsement was given.
Additionally, the advertiser may continue to run the
advertisement only so long as it has good reason to believe
that the endorser remains a bona fide user of the product.”
Using a service that pays for blog posts without providing a
product or experience to the blogger appears to be entirely
illegal and should not be done.
PART 4 – PRIVACY LAWS
• Privacy Generally
• COPPA
• HIPAA
General privacy laws apply to information posted
on social media sites, as well as
• libel laws
• right of publicity laws
• securities laws
COPPA
[15 U.S.C. §6501-6506]
•Enforced by the Federal Trade Commission and other
state and federal agencies
• applies to operators of commercial websites and online
services directed to children under 13 that collect, use, or
disclose personal information from children, and operators
of general audience websites or online services with actual
knowledge that they are collecting, using, or disclosing
personal information from children under 13.
In order to comply with COPPA, there are various notice
requirements that are identified in the attached document
provided by the Federal Trade Commission. The
requirements include:
1. Post a clear and comprehensive privacy policy on their
website describing their information practices for
children’s personal information;
2. Provide direct notice to parents and obtain verifiable
parental consent, with limited exceptions, before
collecting personal information from children;
3. Give parents the choice of consenting to the operator’s
collection and internal use of a child’s information, but
prohibiting the operator from disclosing that information to
third parties;
4. Provide parents access to their child’s personal
information to review and/or have the information deleted;
5. Give parents the opportunity to prevent further use or
online collection of a child’s personal information;
6. Maintain the confidentiality, security, and integrity of
information they collect from children.
7. The Rule also prohibits operators from conditioning a
child’s participation in an online activity on the child’s
providing more information than is reasonably necessary to
participate in that activity.
More information at:
http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/coppafaqs.shtm
HIPAA
• HIPAA’s privacy regulations apply to healthcare
providers, defined as: “a provider of medical or health
services…and any other person or organization who
furnishes, bills, or is paid for health care in the normal
course of business.” 45 C.F.R. 160.103
• The HIPAA Privacy Rule protects the patient’s protected
health information, which is “all individually identifiable
health information held or transmitted by a covered entity
or its business associate, in any form or media, whether
electronic, paper or oral.” 45 C.F.R. 160.103
• HIPAA provides severe penalties for the dissemination of
protected health information (PHI).
• Fines of $100 per disclosure of PHI and up to $25,000
for multiple violations in the same year. 42 U.S.C.
§1320(d)(5).
• Fines up to $250,000 and/or 10 years imprisonment for
knowingly misusing individually identifiable PHI. 42
U.S.C. §1320(d)(6).
Best Practices
• Limit liability by establishing clear policies and
procedures. Review and revise them as needed.
• These policies should:
– explain appropriate use of social media platforms
– clearly define how information posted there will be
used
– specify what degree of privacy can be expected
– state clearly that these forums are not to be used for
personal medical advice (if applicable)
– state clearly that the site is NOT monitored 24 hours a
day, seven days a week
• Post these policies prominently on the social media sites
and incorporate them into off-line documents such as
Notice of Privacy Practices.
• Make sure you follow your own privacy notice
procedures
• Train staff in policies and procedures.
• Don’t practice medicine online. Some patients are more
open than others, and are willing to post details about
themselves that others consider private.
• When comments or questions on your social media
platform are approaching HIPAA violations, take them
offline. Ask the patient to call the medical institution for
more details.
• Regularly monitor social media platforms. Remove any
posts or comments that violate HIPAA regulations by
disclosing protected health information.
Thank You!
Cheryl Burbach
Hovey Williams LLP
84 Corporate Woods
10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 1000
Overland Park, KS 66210
913.647.9050