KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

18
KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015

Transcript of KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

Page 1: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

KBC Strategic Park Partnerships

Memphis: Parks AdvocacySeptember 1, 2015

Page 2: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

Today’s Meeting Goals

To provide a framework for park partnerships that demonstrates the range of roles that a park advocacy organization can play.

To help Memphis park advocates determine a vision and mission for park advocacy efforts in Memphis; and,

To help with guidelines for developing a partnership with the city.

Page 3: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

A Framework for Understanding Park Partnerships

KBC Strategic Park Partnerships

Page 4: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

Park Partnerships: What’s Shaping Them?

• public dollars for parks have decreased• there is a bigger idea of what city parks are for • good ideas come from the power of partners

KBC Strategic Park Partnerships

“Historically the tendency of government was to think it had all the answers. We defined problems and we prescribed solutions. You sent us taxes; we delivered services. But the role of government is evolving from problem-solver to partnership-builder.”

--Mayor Michael Nutter, Philadelphia

Page 5: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

Partnerships create new benefits for the community with assets from each partner

Page 6: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

What Do These Partnerships Look Like?

KBC Strategic Park Partnerships

• There is no single blueprint for how this should be done; ultimately, it involves a process of social learning for the civic leadership in each city.

• A successful partnership works because the reason for it is compelling not coercive to both partners.

Public-private partnerships are agreements among multiple public and private parties to risk money, time, influence, or other assets in pursuit of joint goals.

Page 7: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.
Page 8: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

While Partnership Models Vary, They are Distinguished by Their Relationship with Government

Three key elements of management in parks:

• the ownership of the resources • the sources of income for management• the management body

Page 9: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

Balancing Assets and Liabilities

Page 10: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

The Scope of Responsibility for Park Partnerships Varies

• Fundraising • Earned income • Capital projects • Maintenance and operations • Programming • Marketing and communications • Public outreach • Volunteer projects • Community engagement• Safety and security • Planning • Politics and advocacy

Page 11: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

Operations and Maintenance

Many of the creative funding ideas out there are focused on capital projects, but just as important are those focused on generating funds to operate and care for the growing park systems.

Memphis, 1941

Page 12: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

The Good News – You’re Not Alone

Park partnerships are occurring in an environment of growing public-private partnerships in other public activities, too—especially community development.

A new “technology” of partnerships is thus evolving, offering valuable lessons that can be applied across a variety of arenas.

Page 13: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

Four Case Studies: Citywide Advocates

Page 14: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

Four Considerations for Creating Park Partnerships

Structure

Much like most business partnerships, public-private partnerships for parks include both general partners and limited partners, each with its own set of responsibilities, strengths, and weaknesses. The general partners are typically parks agencies and nonprofit organizations that support parks. The limited partners are the various constituencies that use or support parks.

Page 15: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

Four Considerations for Creating Park Partnerships

Control

In business partnerships, the general partners usually make all of the major decisions, without consulting with the limited partners. In parks partnerships, decision-making responsibility is shared more broadly: limited partners often are given a voice in decision-making in return for their support.

Page 16: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

Four Considerations for Creating Park Partnerships

Assets and Liabilities

Partners bring both assets and liabilities to the partnership. In good partnerships, the assets of one partner offset the liabilities of another. In parks partnerships, assets and liabilities have to do with the partners’ financial resources, organizational capacity, public image, and constituency characteristics.

Page 17: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

Four Considerations for Creating Park Partnerships

Risks

Parks partnerships encounter a variety of risks, but all build trust and develop a set of strategies for mitigating them.

Page 18: KBC Strategic Park Partnerships Memphis: Parks Advocacy September 1, 2015.

The Most Important Goal for Getting Started is a Shared Vision

We are beginning with the belief that an important need can best be fulfilled through a partnership.

The principles for operating should be the same as those of any successful collaborative:

fairness,

transparency and,

inclusiveness