Kate lindsay- Great War Archive

10
The Great War Archive: The Great War Archive: How audiences engaged How audiences engaged with WW1 with WW1 Kate Lindsay Kate Lindsay PI RunCoCo PI RunCoCo [email protected] @ktdigital

description

The Great War Archive: How audiences engaged with WW1

Transcript of Kate lindsay- Great War Archive

Page 1: Kate lindsay- Great War Archive

The Great War Archive: How The Great War Archive: How audiences engaged with WW1audiences engaged with WW1

Kate LindsayKate Lindsay

PI RunCoCoPI RunCoCo

[email protected] @ktdigital

Page 2: Kate lindsay- Great War Archive

Project Aims

To collect and make available online digital version of WW1 memorabilia

held by the public.

Page 3: Kate lindsay- Great War Archive

Year: 2008Length: 16 WeeksMain Country: UKCollection Days: 6Website: http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ww1lit/gwa

The Great War Archive (GWA)

Page 4: Kate lindsay- Great War Archive

Year: 2011 -Length: 6 Months (ongoing)Main Country: GermanyCollection Days: 8Website: http://www.europeana1914-1918.eu

Ester Weltkreg in Altagsdokumenten (EWA)

Page 5: Kate lindsay- Great War Archive

Submissions

A submission is the objects + description contributed to the archive together.

Page 6: Kate lindsay- Great War Archive

Submissions

Page 7: Kate lindsay- Great War Archive

Files

Overall, GWA submissions have fewer files attached than EWA submissions (on average 3.4 and 14.5)

Page 8: Kate lindsay- Great War Archive

People Contributing

Page 9: Kate lindsay- Great War Archive

People Contributing (EWA)

Whilst audience data was not collected for the GWA, we do know that 1/3 of online contributors were uploading submissions on the behalf of someone else.

Page 10: Kate lindsay- Great War Archive

Observations

• The audiences of GWA and EWA were largely over 45 yrs and male.

• The project audiences were often genealogists, military collectors and local

historians.

• Tapping into existing audiences, conversing with them in the spaces and places

that they already existed led to effective engagement.

• It is indicated that a significant proportion of our audience did not have the IT

literacy skills to engage with the project via technologies.

• Research needs to be done into finding “the hook” for younger audiences.