Kano Final

download Kano Final

of 25

Transcript of Kano Final

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    1/25

    Operation Planning and

    Control-

    Kano Model ofCustomer SatisfactionPresented by: Manish Pulse

    MMS 3rd Sem

    Roll no. 38

    BESs Institute of Management Studies and Research, Byculla

    Presented to: Prof. Mukundan

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    2/25

    Objectives

    Origins Purpose

    Process Model Key Elements Methodology

    Application Examples

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    3/25

    Origins of the Kano Model

    Noriaki Kano

    Professor at Tokyo Rika UniversityInternational Consultant

    Received individual Demming Prize in 1997

    Born: 1940

    (Tokyo, Japan)

    http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.jsqc.org/en/inf/images/kano.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.jsqc.org/en/inf/16aqs_cfp2e.html&h=129&w=140&sz=4&tbnid=GXSN4KxEt-KOMM:&tbnh=86&tbnw=93&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dnoriaki%2Bkano%26um%3D1&start=3&sa=X&oi=images&ct=image&cd=3
  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    4/25

    Origins of the Kano Model Noriaki Kano

    Developed foundation for an approach on AttractiveQuality Creation commonly referred to as the KanoModel

    Challenged traditional Customer Satisfaction Modelsthat More is better, i.e. the more you perform on eachservice attribute the more satisfied the customers willbe.

    Proposed new Customer Satisfaction model (KanoModel) Performance on product and service attributes is

    not equal in the eyes of the customers Performance on certain categories attributes

    produces higher levels of satisfaction than others.

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    5/25

    The Kano Model of Customer satisfactionclassifies product attributes based on how they

    are perceived by customers and their effect on

    customer satisfaction.

    These classifications are useful for guiding

    design decisions in that they indicate when

    good is good enough, and when more isbetter.

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    6/25

    When to use the Kano Model

    Project SelectionLean Six Sigma

    Design for Six Sigma

    New Product Development

    New Service Development

    Determine Market Strategies

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    7/25

    Key Elements

    Identify the Voice of the Customer

    Translate Voice of the Customer into

    Critical to Quality Characteristics (CTQs) Rank the CTQs into three categories:Dissatisfier - Must bes Cost of Entry

    Satisfier More is better CompetitiveDelighter Latent Need Differentiator

    Evaluate Current Performance

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    8/25

    Kano Model

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    9/25

    A competitive product meets basic attributes,

    maximises performances attributes, and

    includes as many excitement attributes as

    possible at a cost the market can bear.

    Threshold Attributes

    Threshold (or basic) attributes are the

    expected attributes or musts of a product, and

    do not provide an opportunity for product

    differentiation.

    An example of a threshold attribute would be

    brakes on a car.

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    10/25

    Performance Attributes

    Performance attributes are those for which

    more is generally better, and will improve

    customer satisfaction.

    Example: Customers would be willing to pay

    more for a car that provides them with better

    fuel economy.

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    11/25

    Excitement Attributes

    Excitement attributes are unspoken and

    unexpected by customers but can result in

    high levels of customer satisfaction,however their absence does not lead to

    dissatisfaction.

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    12/25

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    13/25

    Kano Model Process

    Analyze &

    Brainstorm

    Analyze &

    BrainstormResearchResearch Plot &

    Diagram

    Plot &

    Diagram Strategize Strategize

    Researchavailable datasourcesDeterminedata collection

    strategyDesign datacollectioninstrumentsCollect andsummarizedata

    Analyzeresults fromdatacollectionBrainstorm

    list offeatures andfunctionalityDevelopFunctionalandDysfunctional

    DevelopCustomerRequirementMatrixRecord

    Questionnaireresults inMatrix andSummarizePlot resultson KanoModel

    DetermineProjectselectionProduct

    DevelopmentServiceDevelopmentIdentifyMarketingStrategy

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    14/25

    Research

    Must Bes - Focus Groups, Lawsuits and

    Regulations, Buzz on Internet

    Satisfiers - Competitive Analysis, Interviews,Surveys, Search Logs, Usablity Testing,

    Customer Forums

    Delighters - Field Research,

    Marketing/Branding Vision, Industrial Design,

    Packaging, Call Center Data, Site Logs

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    15/25

    Analyze & Brainstorm

    Analyze data from available sources Brainstorm list of features and functionality Determine type of requirements:

    Output Requirements Service Requirements

    Kano Model Requirements Survey User Survey

    Functional form vs. Dysfunctional Form How would you feel if the product hadfeature X? How would you feel if the product didnt have feature X?

    Kano Questionnaire Answers: I like it. I expect it. Im neutral. I can tolerate it. I dislike it.

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    16/25

    Example: Requirements Survey

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    17/25

    Example: Requirements Questionnaire

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    18/25

    Functional vs. Dysfunctional Comparison

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    19/25

    Evaluation Customer Requirements

    C.R. A E O R Q I Total Grade1 3 6 14 23 O

    2 5 6 11 1 23 O

    3 6 1 4 1 11 23 I

    4 13 10 23 E

    5 11 1 2 9 23 A

    Customer Requirement is:

    A: Attractive R: Reverse Q: Questionable Result

    E: Expected O: One Dimensional I: Indifferent

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    20/25

    Plot & Diagram

    Delighters

    Attractive

    Excited Quality

    Dissatisfier

    Must BeExpected Quality

    Satisfier

    One Dimensional

    Desired Quality

    Dissatisfaction

    Satisfaction

    Service

    Performance

    Service

    Performance

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    21/25

    Kano Model & QFD

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    22/25

    Strategize

    Project SelectionLean Six Sigma

    Design for Six Sigma

    Organizational StrategyDissatisfier Must bes Cost of Entry

    Satisfier More is better Competitive

    Delighter Latent Need Differentiator

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    23/25

    Application

    Break into Teams Select Team Leader Select Scribe Select Presenter Scenario You work for a Hotel chain and your company is trying to

    identify Voice of the Customer information to improve Hotelperformance.

    Instructions: Brainstorm important characteristics you expect when staying at a Hotel Identify whether they are a Must be, Expected or a Delighter from a

    Business Client perspective and from a vacationer perspective Add in what the current performance is for the Hotel

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    24/25

    Example Results

  • 8/4/2019 Kano Final

    25/25